Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Washington Files First Consumer Protection Lawsuit Over Kickstarter Fraud

Posted by Soulskill on from the reckoning-comes-due dept.

An anonymous reader writes "In 2012, a card game called Asylum was successfully funded on Kickstarter. Two months later, its expected delivery date came and passed without a product. In July 2013, the company behind the game stopped communicating with backers. Now, the Washington state Attorney General has filed a consumer protection lawsuit against the makers. This is the first time a project from a crowdfunding site has been the target of such a lawsuit. The AG said, 'Consumers need to be aware that crowdfunding is not without risk. This lawsuit sends a clear message to people seeking the public's money: Washington state will not tolerate crowdfunding theft. The Attorney General's Office will hold those accountable who don't play by the rules.' Here's the legal document (PDF)."

47 comments

  1. So.... by ArcadeNut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The system is working the way it should?

    Good.

    --
    Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    1. Re:So.... by Noishkel · · Score: 1

      Well the fact you don't have scammers bilking people right left should be an indicator that it is working fine as is. Although on the outside this also looks like a legit case for a lawsuit too.

    2. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was that guy asking for $80,000 to make a game with "Skyrim-like" graphics.

      There was another for a woman asking for money to send her daughter to a code camp to teach her brothers a lesson. She played the patriarchy card to bring in tens of thousands. And she'd tried it previously on IndieGoGo with a "get her children to stop playing video games" scheme.

    3. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well to be fair, Skyrim shipped with a lot of terrible low poly meshes and low resolution textures, presumably so it would run on consoles. Though Bethesda did provide a higher res texture pack after release to PC players, and thankfully there are community mods to fix what that doesn't cover.

      Still, the graphics are hardly what makes that game remarkable. The truly impossible task would be making an open world on the same scale as Skyrim on that budget.

  2. Warning: Slashdot Beta on the rise again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Warning: I'm getting bounced more frequently to the Beta site once again; Dice may be having another go at trying to roll it out. Be warned.

    I wonder what percentage of Slashdot visitors are immediately switching back to Slashdot Classic by using the link at the bottom of the page ?

    If you don't like Slashdot Beta, then don't live with it. Use the link at the bottom of the page to go back to Slashdot Classic and send a _huge_ message to Dice at the same time when they come to look at their website logs.

    If you like this idea, feel free to repost this message in other stories and help send a message to Dice they cannot ignore.

    1. Re:Warning: Slashdot Beta on the rise again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I changed my bookmark to http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1 even before the Slashcott.

    2. Re:Warning: Slashdot Beta on the rise again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, someone at Dice clearly doesn't like this idea.

      That just makes me convinced this is actually a rather good idea.

      Captcha: shaming. How very appropriate. Perhaps we can shame Dice into dropping Beta once and for all.

  3. Which way is the wind blowing today? by kwbauer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So is this a case of too much government involvement in "open source" things or is this a case of the government is a bit late and should have prevented this situation from happening in the first place?

    1. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by dnavid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So is this a case of too much government involvement in "open source" things or is this a case of the government is a bit late and should have prevented this situation from happening in the first place?

      In my opinion neither. The government has no specific interest in deciding how people choose to invest their money, provided those investments are not explicitly fraudulent. But they do have an obligation to police illegal fraud. Kickstarter projects can fail: that is the risk investors take as investors. But if the people running the project do not make a good-faith effort to produce what they have asserted they can produce for their investors, that's a crime. I would say going dark on your investors for almost a year strongly suggests no good faith effort is being made to complete the project.

    2. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I have heard that people who put money into Kickstarter aren't really investing since they don't own a piece of the company (like they would if there was stock or something being given). Mostly they are donating to the project with specified "awards" for various levels of donation. Most times if you donate the right amount you are supposed to get the product - if it ever ships. But you aren't guaranteed it will ever ship, so you aren't really investing (no returns) and not really buying (no guarantee of product) - you are donating. Nothing wrong with that - but people should understand what they are likely in for.

    3. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      Neither?

      This has nothing to with open source, not even when put into quotes.

      Kickstarter has made it abundantly clear that you are not investing, and while it likes to still suggest that you're just throwing money at people and any perks offered are just that, perks, their own guidelines make very clear that if the project is successful, the creators have a contractual obligation to deliver. Of course, Kickstarter itself doesn't get involved - they just offer the platform and take their percentage of the cut. They even responded to a website with a generic 'Kickstarter has hosted umpteenthousands of successful projects - gee whizz I sure hope it works out for everybody involved' (I'll dig up source if need be.).

      It's also not the government being too late. This isn't the first lawsuit against a Kickstarter project creator. It is, however, the first one being started by a government entity on consumer protection grounds, rather than just between a backer and the project creator on contract grounds. There isn't really any threshold for 'too soon' or 'too late' in this - the AG here just felt an itch, and now they're scratching it, and in the process sending a message: even if backers end up just throwing their hands in the air because a $20 pledge per individual is not worth even walking to the courthouse to those individuals, the AG might take notice if the totals are thousands of dollars and hundreds of people essentially getting duped.

    4. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The amount of content on the project page is a bit much for a basic scam.

      My gut is that the project failed catastrophically somehow and rather than own up to it, this Nash guy just decided to let it sit there and maybe go away on its own.

      Personally I think this lawsuit is a good thing. A reminder to backers that these projects don't always turn out, and a reminder to posters that they are getting real money from real people and even though it's an "investment" they do still have obligations.

    5. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are protecting people from fraud, which is their job. Calm the fuck down.

    6. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that it looks like there is enough there that he could have actually completed the deck, even if the quality wasn't really up to the hype it should have been good enough to stay out of legal trouble.

    7. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The argument of whether there's too much or too little government in anything does occur in other cultures outside America. But I find that in America, it too often becomes the main focus whenever there's a political discussion, distracting from what needs to be done. Also see 'socialism,' 'liberal agenda,' 'democracy,' 'freedom fries' and other such nonsense.

      How about we focus on actual policies and not ideology?

    8. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by Meeni · · Score: 1

      What about a case of the government coming at the right time, after the fact so as not to stifle innovation, but before the problem has grown like a monstrous chancre ?

    9. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue here is that the person didn't just fail to deliver the product, the person didn't produce any of the promised rewards either. The rewards for pledging are supposed to be more or less guaranteed by the project, the actual project is where the risk lies. So, the pledge levels for the project are always kind of iffy as they're dependent upon the project being completed, but the chips and all the rest that are separate from the project are different and are typically just a matter of sending in an order.

      Had the project shipped the rewards they probably wouldn't have filed suit. Things like this are usually handled by the people involved rather than that state attorney general's office..

    10. Re:Which way is the wind blowing today? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      He has $25000 you could pay a graphic designer 3 months wages, and get a company to print a first shipment with that.

      Plus apparently the person running the kickstart campaign IS the designer. The fact he can't deliver something so simple with that much cash just reeks of fraud. That combined with the fact that kickstarter is supposed to kick-start a project. It doesn't need to be profitable before the campaign has finished.

      Either the person running the campaign doesn't get it, or actually gets it very well and is enjoying a nice holiday somewhere nice with the money he ripped off others.

  4. Interesting by Arethereanyleft · · Score: 1

    Glad to hear it. Too many Kickstarter projects have screwed over their backers. Sure, you can play the "investment" card, but there are still several projects where the creators shipped a few units and then just disappeared. It's one thing to fail to create, but yet another just to keep the goods for yourself.

    1. Re:Interesting by sjames · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, you can play the "investment" card,

      Actually, this guy can't seem to come up with cards to play :-)

    2. Re:Interesting by sgt+scrub · · Score: 0

      Oh no you didn't!

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  5. No John Campbell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If there's anyone who needs a lawsuit for defrauding customers, it's John Campbell and the downright hostile conclusion of his Sad Pictures for Children Kickstarter promises. The man's an outright con artist with narcissistic personality disorder.

    Judge for yourselves selves: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/73258510/sad-pictures-for-children/posts/759318

    1. Re:No John Campbell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that was an adventure..

      I've never heard of the guy, or his artwork, but it sounds more like he suffers from severe mental issues rather than that he intentionally sought to con people.

    2. Re:No John Campbell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That whole thing was just sad.

      I don't know what the truth is, maybe it is all a con. Personally I got the impression that it started legit, he screwed up the financials on an epic level, then went into his weak anti-money diatribe (or whatever the hell that is) to avoid admitting it (probably even to himself). He wouldn't be the first person to suddenly develop a "capitalism is a lie and you are all idiots for following it" mindset after failing epically at it.

      It's definitely clear that he suffers from some kind of mental issues.

    3. Re:No John Campbell? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the truth is, maybe it is all a con. Personally I got the impression that it started legit, he screwed up the financials on an epic level.

      I don't know...the fact that he got 2 people to basically pay $300 each so he could go to the doctor and dentist seems more like a con than anything else to me. That, and the tier of $500 for a stick-figure portrait.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:No John Campbell? by Boronx · · Score: 1

      This is the thing that gets me about Kickstarter. Some guy who once design a great game goes on Kickstarter to fund a sequel. He ends up with $2 million dollars. Who the hell knows if he can manage the money? Nobody knows. He could have the best of intentions, but simply spend the money foolishly and end up broke with a half-finished product.

      --
      Play Command HQ online
    5. Re:No John Campbell? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      On the up-side a half-finished product still meets the minimum requirements if he puts it on a server for download.

      Judging the economy of a large scale (or even small scale) operation is hard. Tons of projects go over budget. In the case of kickstarter if you go over budget you're kind of screwed since you can't later raise the price. It's extremely easy to underestimate expenses when you haven't done it before.

      Then again the honorable thing to do is to go back to your supporters and go "look I fucked up, I thought I had the price set in stone but then I forgot to account for payroll taxes. Please send an extra 10%. If someone did that for me on a project and it was actually an honest mistake (or so I thought) I would be willing to send a few extra bucks.

      Ultimately though I do have a problem with companies that are attempting to profit by putting people at extreme risk financially. I know from running a rental company over this last year that I probably spend 30% more than what I would expect and I'm a spreadsheet junkie who loves strategizing these sorts of business plans. Without any experience these companies are taking advantage of people who are almost undoubtedly going to lose money with starry eyed dreams of success in order to fuel their own advancement. Kickstarter is going to take their fee even if the project doesn't deliver. There are other crowd sourced endeavors where the company brags about how you can get things directly from people for less--and when I look at the expenses I know come tax season/the first time their equipment needs repairs/time to rotate the tires etc that the reason these services are so cheap is because people who aren't professional ____ will underbid. They'll realize they didn't have a grasp on the finances and then quit and another sucker will take their place.

    6. Re:No John Campbell? by Anrego · · Score: 1

      The thing about crowd funding as an alternative to traditional funding is that banks and investors are very good at recognizing that a product is going to fail. The crowd funding community is very early in developing that same sense, but I think it will come.

      The interesting thing is that one of the big appeals to crowd funding is it allows ideas to become a reality that would never have passed through the risk-averse traditional funding routes.

      Eventually I hope a middle ground will form, comprised of a more savvy average backer, a little more diligence on the part of kickstarter (maybe via some kind of rating/analysis done on projects over a certain size?), but still with some of the same spirit of throwing money at stuff because it sounds cool and you really want it to happen vice because you've got some pretty charts and a pile of math showing it'll be profitable.

    7. Re:No John Campbell? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      The thing about crowd funding as an alternative to traditional funding is that banks and investors are very good at recognizing that a product is going to fail. The crowd funding community is very early in developing that same sense, but I think it will come.

      The interesting thing is that one of the big appeals to crowd funding is it allows ideas to become a reality that would never have passed through the risk-averse traditional funding routes.

      Eventually I hope a middle ground will form, comprised of a more savvy average backer, a little more diligence on the part of kickstarter (maybe via some kind of rating/analysis done on projects over a certain size?), but still with some of the same spirit of throwing money at stuff because it sounds cool and you really want it to happen vice because you've got some pretty charts and a pile of math showing it'll be profitable.

      Yeah, banks don't offer small business loans until you've been in business for several years and have an income (gross, I think) of several hundred thousand dollars, which shouldn't be too surprising, but that's a pretty high bar for most small projects.

      Make no mistake, crowdfunded projects are absolutely high-risk ventures, or they'd be getting funding from more traditional sources. Financing a project from start to finish with only crowd funding is especially risky, especially if the developers don't have an established track record. It's extremely easy to underestimate how much time and effort it takes to bring a project to fruition. I've been a game developer for 15 years, and it's taken me much of that time to be able to properly estimate a development project (and I still occasionally get things badly wrong). And of course, there's the risk of outright failure from fraudulent or extremely incompetent developers.

      I'm not really sure what sort of "middle ground" would work, though it's an interesting idea. Maybe a company (Kickstarter, 3rd party?) could offer a service to vet potential projects for a fee and present their findings to potential funders. Things they could investigate:

      * Experience of developers with similar projects
      * Result of previous crowdfunding efforts
      * Financial history and stability of developers (e.g. credit rating)
      * History / stability of development team
      * Quality of development plan
      * Current project completion
      * Overall subjective impression

      As you mentioned, this would probably be most appropriate for teams trying to raise larger sums of money, where more is at stake.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    8. Re:No John Campbell? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Which is somewhat my point. Even experience developers will estimate wrong. Without a financial backstop a developer might think it will cost $100k, but actually costs $170k. Normally a publisher either eats their losses and cancels the project if it's $75k in and needs another $75k or else they up their investment in the project.

      Kickstarter is great because you can get funding. It's fundamentally flawed because you are legally obligated to meet a deadline that even experienced developers miss a significant non-zero portion of the time. Kickstarter certainly has the potential to financially ruin people. If you are legally obligated to finish and finishing ends up costing twice what you budgeted then instead of just cancelling the project and your investors taking a hit--your investors can sue you to finish the project even beyond their investment. So what often happens is someone out of humiliation and threat works for another year for free and gives away a product that costs them money for every unit. Which again happens in the regular industry but often is diluted with other hits.

      Nobody is a 100% hit machine. Nobody makes 100% of their deadlines and estimates. Instead of having flexibility to adapt as time goes on it seems like Kickstarter either showers success or ruinous failure on its kickstarter campaigns by its very design.

  6. Nice. by pregister · · Score: 1

    Man, that looks like a pretty cool game! How can I contribute?

    1. Re:Nice. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Send a cheque, along with your bank account into to:

      Sirus lyscrwme
      123 Maple Street
      Anytown USA.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  7. see all the latest shitty kickstarters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.reddit.com/r/shittykickstarters/new/

  8. spiritual bankruptcy proceedings ongoing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    world wide intervention underway vs. corepirate nazi zion crown royal WMD on credit genocidal mutant (spiritless) self appointed self worshipping imaginary semi-chosen neogods rock on /. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=universal+spirit+wake+up+call thanks again moms

  9. he must've visited the denver airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    giant murals of horse's butts, kids being killed etc....http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=denver+airport

  10. Kickstart is dumb by Boronx · · Score: 1

    Nerds who knowingly paid for game that did not exist upset that game does not exist and go running to big government instead of wising up.

    --
    Play Command HQ online
    1. Re:Kickstart is dumb by Anguirel · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone went running. This looks more like the Ass't Attorney General went fishing for a case (something about asking around for anyone that had a KickStarter fail to deliver) and happened to find one that he could prosecute. Probably just testing the waters for cases of this nature, and looking to establish himself with a high-profile case at the same time.

      --
      ~Anguirel (lit. Living Star-Iron)
      QA: The art of telling someone that their baby is ugly without getting punched.
  11. John Campbell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooops, looks like John Campbell shouldn't have burned those books he promised his backers now.

    1. Re:John Campbell by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's pulling a really good con, but from what I can tell the dude legitimately tried, failed hard, then had a complete and total mental breakdown. His final rantings seem those of a man who finally snapped under stress and created a fantasy world in his head to cope with it.

      If they can even find the guy, he's probably flat broke anyway.

  12. Oculus Rift? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    And what of Oculus now that they sold out to Facebook? If I actually contributed to it, I would be royally pissed by now!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Oculus Rift? by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Oculus delivered their kickstarter rewards.

  13. Nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In 2012, a card game called Asylum was successfully funded on Kickstarter. Two months later, its expected delivery date came and passed without a product. In July 2013, the company behind the game stopped communicating with backers. Now, the Washington state Attorney General has filed a consumer protection lawsuit against the makers. This is the first time a project from a crowdfunding site has been the target of such a lawsuit. The AG said, 'Consumers need to be aware that crowdfunding is not without risk. This lawsuit sends a clear message to people seeking the public's money: Washington state will not tolerate crowdfunding theft. The Attorney General's Office will hold those accountable who don't play by the rules.' Here's the legal document (PDF)."

    Isn't this technically how government operates? They steal your money ie taxes, tax anything and everything. Never sticking to its core of serving the public's needs, such as better infrastructure, I could give a list far longer but I will refrain, then spend the money on stupid shit, or it disappears. I think the AG needs to look in the mirror and to the left and right, and more so if there is concern over 'public' money.

    By no means am I saying this case should be dropped, and people allowed to be ripped off. But most of these people are fairly wealthy and are reckless with their money, so I am not shedding any tears. People obsessed with naive notions of having to have the next {what they think] big thing before anyone else. This should have happened a lot sooner since most of the projects still haven't been released to those that help fund them, especially if lower income people are funding projects that are of use to them in terms of disabilities, medical issues, ect...

  14. Ahhh kickstarter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where you can 'buy' products that do not exist. On a credit card with money you do not have!

  15. In the meantime... by mutherhacker · · Score: 1

    ...big financial criminals roam free! Way to go state attorney!

  16. PebblePeak at RocketHub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're going after a $25,000 account? Then they should look at PebblePeak at RocketHub. They've collected nearly $170,000 (yes, that much) and have not delivered anything.

  17. Sue Politicians for not keeping their promises? by RealGene · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for the prez to make good on his net-neutrality pledge, not to mention closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay...

    --
    Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
  18. Lockpicks by Schuyler Towne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although friends are still trying (four years after the fact) to fix this one -- https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/schuyler/lockpicks-by-open-locksport/comments -- some of the earlier comments indicate what happened to cause the project to go off the rails from the beginning. Evidently, so much money flowed in (over and above what he was expecting) and he used it to fund his lifestyle rather than do the work. Hopefully, he has been banned for life from kickstarter and other crowdfunding sites.