Humans Causing California's Mountains To Grow
New submitter Megan Sever writes: "This is a cool story about anthropogenic effects of water withdrawal moving mountains — literally. According to new research published today (abstract) and reported in EARTH Magazine, humans have been causing the Sierra Nevada mountains to rise. By withdrawing water for irrigation and other purposes, we have inadvertently removed water from the mountains, allowing them to uplift. The research shows a seasonal and annual cycle."
I thought Grand Tetons only swelled when you add liquid to them.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
Bah, we've been building "mountains" for quite a while already.
Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
I'm certain that plate tectonics have absolutely nothing to do with the rise in the mountains.
only it is completely localized. I'm sure all those folks in CA will be fine with laws banning them from using any irrigation.
Is that a mountain in your pants or are you just happy to see us humans?
Table-ized A.I.
Maybe faith is just lack of water.
I can see it, I guess... you'd have to have a pretty strong faith to think you could live very long without water, after all.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
EARTH Magazine? Do they also publish URANUS Monthly? Finally a venue for goat.se
Table-ized A.I.
When the oceans rise, and the world becomes part of the new order of Undersea Atlantis.
Well, clearly we need to work on erosion. I'll do my part by going up there and trampling all over them. /s
Did you trip up on a previously flat paving stone while walking?
Global Talling is why.
Bring it on in the Sierras!
Unpublished? It's published right here: http://www.nature.com/nature/j...
So what data are they using to compare to the current data to determine this is caused by man's actions?
They looked at seasonal variations. If seasonal variations are causing a change in elevation, why wouldn't the volume of groundwater lost over the past century and a half also cause a change in elevation? In fact, when they compared the expected changes in elevation with the observed changes they got a pretty good match.
These guys need to Google "GPS seasonal variations" before they publish.
Can you say population control, Hmmm, lets start with the people who conduct these studies...
This reminds me of isostasy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isostasy/ --as mountains erode, they rise again due to the buoyancy of the rock underneath them floating upon the magma below.
Pull out the mass of the water, and up go the mountains.
--PeterM
Now watch all the powers that be in California to strive to attract ever more businesses and new residents to California thus insuring that their tribulations and disasters will grow ever more frequent and vicious in effects. And make note that no political figure will sound off about stopping building permits and asking businesses to leave California. No matter how awful it gets the traditional machine will just keep trying to do the same old, wrong, thing.
It may sound natural to you but what you are suggesting sounds like magic to me - spend a century or more removing billions of tons of underground water and nothing changes, not even slightly? The research is published in Nature, you know what to do if you think they are wrong, right?
And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
As the snow accumulates in the winter the mountain compresses. As it melts in the summer it rises. That is what they found when they measured it. It is a surprising result, and may make your head hurt, but it is what they found.
So did you even try to read the article or are you a moron? You've been posting for a while here, and it's easy to draw the conclusion that you decided what you want to be true before you read it. You even state that you have seen they take into account the natural effects. Sounds like you're a moron to me, and haven't bothered to RTFA. The other thing is that you are talking about something about which you know nothing. You claim to understand yet call thing "unpublished" despite it appearing in Nature. This is another example of an armchair fuckwit jumping to conclusions rather than actually paying attention to what is being said. Your post does say the word "controversial" but what it obvious is that you're just plain stupid.
Californication; the clues are in the song.
That's just swell.
No brain, no pain.
Every slashdotter knows no amount of human activity can have any effect whatsoever on the environment around us! That's we rape and pillage every speck of nature around us, it's the truth and beauty of Keynesian economics!
Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
Even when i've been working in mapping and topography for the last 15 years.
Maybe for X and Y, but Z is the weakest link, it's highly relative, there are so many things that can give you a fluctuation in that scale that i wouldn't even dare to take those last digits literal, but hell, if they can you published in nature... i will turn creative and give it a shot.
Sometimes common sense is better than peer review.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salton_Sea#Earthquake_geology
After the last flood from the Colorado River into the Salton Sea after 1900, a series of dams were built to keep the river from flowing into California. Since then there are been no really large magnitude earthquakes from the San Andreas in Southern California.
It seems extremely likely that human activity has altered the earthquake pattern. This means it is possible that removing large amounts of ground water from the San Joaquin Valley could measurably effect the height of the Sierra Nevada mountains.
Why is Snark Required?
If I recall my elementary school meteorology correctly, The Sierra Nevada mountains cause water vapor to be precipitated on the western (towards the ocean side) side of the mountains, creating a wet humid climate west of the mountains and a dry arid climate east of the mountains. If the mountains are in fact getting taller, this effect may be amplified, meaning less water getting to the eastern side of the range. Since humans are most likely to be extracting the water from the mountains in order to meet water needs for communities east of the range, they will need to extract more water if the mountains rise and the rising of the mountains causes the eastern side to be more arid. Thus it may be that extracting bound water from the Sierras may end up being a game we could never have won in the long term. Could be interesting to see how it turns out.
AND you misspelled TECTONIC you TWIT.