Slashdot Mirror
Biggest Dinosaur Yet Discovered
An anonymous reader quote the BBC:
"Fossilised bones of a dinosaur believed to be the largest creature ever to walk the Earth have been unearthed in Argentina, palaeontologists say. Based on its huge thigh bones, it was 40m (130ft) long and 20m (65ft) tall. Weighing in at 77 tonnes, it was as heavy as 14 African elephants, and seven tonnes heavier than the previous record holder, Argentinosaurus. Scientists believe it is a new species of titanosaur — an enormous herbivore dating from the Late Cretaceous period. A local farm worker first stumbled on the remains in the desert near La Flecha, about 250km (135 miles) west of Trelew, Patagonia."
quit using synonyms for very big. it's getting tedious. thank you.
Can you give me a size reference in school buses, swimming pools or football fields? And not those European ones, Gridiron please.
Titanosaur Robfordus just doesn't have that ring to it...
So therefore they don't exist right?
it was as heavy as 14 African elephants
Next time, could you please use car analogy?
hilarious
Right on time for Gozilla's promotion !
Coincidence ? I think not !
It wasn't fat, it was big-boned!
With a small herd of these pet pandasauri—and an enormous harvest of coprolignum—one could well up the Great Wall of China in record time. It would still required great hordes or workers, but the workers would be highly obedient. Anyone who slacks off would have their highly-prized long-handled trowel promptly confiscated. With no hall pass, it's crenellation duty for you. From there it's years fighting your way up the rank just to obtain the corner-pocket edge-finishing tool.
Or did it weigh as much as 50 F150 trucks? Come one, we have a metric system for a reason on this planet.
I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
to bury this story like they do all of the others because their kind is incapable of understanding that dinosaurs existed. They punish people that are smarter than themselves, and that is most people.
You've had an opportunity to write "you're a pal and a coelacanth" and you screwed it!
We know that mass generally increases with the cube of a creature's height, and the tensile strength of bone can only support so much pressure from a creature's own weight, so it seems that if there should be some limit to how large a creature in earth's gravity can be (and, for the sake of argument, not being provided any additional buoyancy due to being under water, for instance). This particular creature is alleged over 60 feet tall, and more than 10 times the height of a man, which makes it more than 1000 times the mass of a human. Cross sectional area generally increases with the square of height difference, meaning that more than 10 times as much pressure would be exerted on every square inch of a lateral cross section of bone as what human bones endure. Now granted, this creature was not shaped like a man, and having four legs instead of just two could give it some additional advantage in this department. Additionally, it could have denser bones, capable of supporting more weight, but denser bone structure in turn requires more muscle mass to move, and will tend to further increase the creature's size. Still, it seems like there's still got to be a maximum possible size. Does anyone know what this might be?
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
I can only imagine the poor dog working his balls into sweat to bury this bone.
...now that sounds scary
Table-ized A.I.
Newtasaurus Gingrichii?
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
I just wanted to share a theory of mine about dinosaurs have you ever watched the Flintstones? How about ancient aliens?
Dude! Pass me that joint and the Fritos, man!
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
"(...) largest creature ever to walk the Earth have been unearthed (...)"
If some words, manifestly "to this date" or something synonymous to them, are not
missing here, then article's author should prepare to travel to Norway for imminent
Nobel prize.
Funny that you mention Fred Flintstone.
I was just thinking, 'bout an hour ago, about how Fred's 'car', to me, as a kid
looked like (had the same shape as) the provice of Gelderland in Holland.
I forget whether Fred's car was running to the left or to the right.
So now I'm off to google & wikipedia, to do a comparative analysis of said
province and aforementioned 'car', in order to finally put to rest a thought
that's been a 'cognitive harmonic' to me for some 45 odd years.
More like Pokemon than transformers.
Tough men LOVE viruses.
Don't worry guys, it is just some ancient dinosaur hardly 77 tons in weight and about six stories tall. It can never challenge the current holder of the title "The Biggest Dinosaur", Microsoft.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
After this interview, Dr. Pol asked several laborers to check for Ghouls, then retired to his quarters for milksteak and jelly beans.
It's only a category III Kaiju...
You know, no matter how large a dinosaur you find, how can you prove that it's the largest?
Not without digging up every cubic meter of the Earth's crust to some reasonable depth.
Any chance this is a one-off? Maybe a brontosaurus that happened to have gigantism? I understand they can do some DNA analysis and all, but I'm curious how a single bone find can lead to the implication of a whole new species.
Maybe the Behemoth that the Bible talks about. Dinosaurs or dragons were created 6 thousand years ago at the same time as everything else. Most destroyed in the worldwide flood 4400 years ago. If the earth were flatter there is enough water on the planet to cover everything over a mile deep. The mountains were formed during the flood. There is no scientific evidence for evolution. Watch Kent Hovinds movies on youtube.
Or camposaur.
They do say that Jacob was the father of the 12 tribes of Israel - one bone for a whole new species, so to speak.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
You bring up good points but I have no idea how big some sauropods got. Remember, however, that sauropod bones were built to maximize strength and minimize weight. They are perforated by air cavities much like a bird. It is possible that they had bird-like air sacs and "blow through" respiratory systems, which, as in birds, are more efficient than the respiratory systems of mammals.
As you know, early concepts of sauropods showed them as amphibious creatures spending much of their time in buoyant water feeding. On the other hand we know that sauropods laid their eggs on land and may even have tended their nests. Assuming that sauropods were amphibious, this means that extremely large animals would have had to leave and reenter their "preferred" watery habitats. In many, if not most cases, this would mean that these beasts would have had to traverse soft marshy or swampy ground. Of course, they wouldn't have done this in a bipedal mode. Likely they walked with one foot up and three on the substrate.
I'm not finding any real data but even taken the largest known sauropod footprints [which may be overly large for artifactual reasons], it looks like each foot of the largest known sauropod would have exerted maybe 80 lbs/square inch of downward force. When walking, our human single-foot-one-the-ground exerts less than 6 lb/square inch of downward force. I think these relationships mean that large sauropods couldn't traverse swampy mud without becoming eternally stuck. In turn, this means that large sauropods couldn't live in water because they couldn't manage soupy beaches.
But how could these animals drink given the fact that drinking water is in ponds, lakes or rivers? Maybe that's one reason for their long necks. They could stand back on dry [or drier] ground and fill their bellies.