Kaleidescape Settles With DVD CCA But No Victory For DRM
An anonymous reader writes "10 years ago the copyright police at the DVD CCA sued Kaleidescape for creating movie servers that (allegedly in breach of contract) allowed customers to copy their DVDs onto a hard drive. Yesterday, a California court announced the was voluntarily dismissed. 'Kaleidescape has always maintained that the DVD CCA contracts express no such prohibitions. In any case, Kaleidescape servers make bit-for-bit copies so that the digital rights management (DRM) provisions of CSS are preserved. The legal imbroglio with the DVD CCA has forced Kaleidescape to impose burdens on its customers and its engineers while offshore companies like AnyDVD and the U.S. manufacturers that employ their legally untouchable software proceed with impunity.' Is there a broader implication for DRM? Not really."
That when it comes to business in the US, it's easier to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission. And if that doesn't work, offshore it!
Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
Yesterday, a California court announced the was voluntarily dismissed.
*THE* was voluntarily dismissed??? Who's case was dismissed??? Who is THE? K-Scape or the DVD CCA???
Weak.
Has DRM ever worked? One instance? I've never heard of it lasting longer than a few days.
So... it took 10 years for the legal system to get to this point, and even now its only over because someone gave up, not because we had judgement? Amazing.
Kaleidescape makes XBMC look like a pretender. We need an open source alternative to it that can be based in another country.
Finally, Kaleidascape is free to dominate the market for big expensive boxes that can rip and store DVDs so you don't have to dig through piles of them just to watch something when you get home from work.
I think it worked on CPPM on DVD Audio and CPRM on SD Cards, but only because nobody cared enough to break it.
Never mind, they have been broken too.
How should a U.S.-born U.S. citizen residing in the U.S. go about getting off his ass and qualifying for a work visa in a country where contributing to XBMC is lawful?
"a California court announced the was voluntarily dismissed"
What was voluntarily dismissed?
I accidentally the summary.
Maybe they are right, because they are not circumventing DRM.
But they are wrong with the idea of DRM. If you copy a DVD to harddisk with intact DRM and then play it, you can copy the harddisk and play the copy, too. So its circumventing DRM while keeping the DRM(-System) intact.
" Is there a broader implication for DRM? Not really."
But is it going to stop them from parading it as such? Hell no.
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?