Slashdot Mirror


Civilians Try to Lure an Abandoned NASA Spacecraft Back to Earth

A New York Times piece (as carried by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) outlines a fascinating project operating in unlikely circumstances for a quixotic goal. They want to control, and return to earth, the International Sun-Earth Explorer-3, launched in 1978 but which "appears to be in good working order." Engineer Dennis Wingo, along with like minded folks (of whom he says "We call ourselves techno-archaeologists") has established a business called Skycorp that "has its offices in the McDonald's that used to serve the Navy's Moffett air station, 15 minutes northwest of San Jose, Calif. After the base closed, NASA converted it to a research campus for small technology companies, academia and nonprofits. ... The race to revive the craft, ISEE-3, began in earnest in April. At the end of May, using the Arecibo Observatory radio telescope in Puerto Rico, the team succeeded in talking to the spacecraft, a moment Mr. Wingo described as "way cool." This made Skycorp the first private organization to command a spacecraft outside Earth orbit, he said. The most disheartening part: "No one has the full operating manual anymore, and the fragments are sometimes contradictory." The most exciting? "Despite the obstacles, progress has been steady, and Mr. Wingo said the team should be ready to fire the engines within weeks."

53 comments

  1. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is old news to Slashdot readers. See http://tech.slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=ISEE+3

    1. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a Timothy update. 'Duh' is his middle name.

    2. Re:Duh by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I know how they do this!

      First, get a bald chick from India, and that fat drunk girl, who replaced the annoying blonde on "Cheers"...

      Then, amplify the sound of a garage-door spring being struck by a rubber mallet. It helps if you have an octave pedal, to shift this down.

      You can take the rest from here.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Duh by operagost · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the crotchety country doctor wearing a big disco medallion.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Duh by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      It WAS 1979....

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. summary is not accurate by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Informative

    The team is not trying to bring the craft back to earth as in re entry as would be assumed by the summary, but they are trying to re pourpos the craft. The craft in question has already been re purposed at least one time in the past. This is the only time it will be close enough to take it back and put it in an orbit that will make it useful again. Im pretty sure we had an article about that here on /. a few months ago

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    1. Re:summary is not accurate by Noah+Haders · · Score: 4, Interesting

      what are the legal relationships here, I wonder? does this still belong to NASA? or has it been discarded/written off? what if civilians (or military) in China tried to do the same thing, is it fair game?

    2. Re:summary is not accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I believe that NASA has at least given permission to these guys to take control of the spacecraft if they can figure out how. Not entirely sure if ownership has been transferred.

    3. Re:summary is not accurate by jeffasselin · · Score: 5, Informative

      They signed an agreement:

      http://spacecollege.org/isee3/...

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    4. Re:summary is not accurate by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 3, Informative

      NASA has given the approval to communicate and control it, so there's a partnership there (and probably a lot of goodwill to, since NASA isn't doing this because they couldn't find the funding for the project).

      It would be a diplomatic incident if China did it without seeking approval, but again, it's unlikely anyone would care if it wasn't active disruption.

    5. Re:summary is not accurate by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It would be a diplomatic incident if China did it without seeking approval

      China probably doesn't have the right password.

    6. Re:summary is not accurate by repvik · · Score: 2

      "swordfish"

    7. Re:summary is not accurate by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      Its all analog, from 1978, there is no security what so ever other than knowing how to send it commands and what commands.

      Theres no CPU in it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:summary is not accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China probably doesn't know the commands.

      My grandfather worked on weather satellites in that era and he went to the dentist with an armed guard in case they put him under the gas and he started talking (the bullet was for him not the dentist). While chances are no one cares any more, the secrets being a big deal at the time and now obsolete it's unlikely that a foreign power could put them together without a lot of effort.

      NASA and the project collaborating with NASA have the advantage of being able to pull the original specs and operators manual and they still had to piece together how to actually do it. A foreign power (working without the cooperation of NASA or the project in the article) would have to figure it out with whatever records they have from their espionage programs at the time which may well be full of misinformation and probably was more generic and not about this particular spacecraft 9they would have been interested in spy satellites not deep space probes).

    9. Re:summary is not accurate by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Its all analog, from 1978, there is no security what so ever other than knowing how to send it commands and what commands.

      Theres no CPU in it.

      It's not all analog. It has a processor, just not what you would call a CPU.
      P.S., I had a home computer in 1978, the world was not all analog.

  3. they're all terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How dare they try to use space junk?!

    1. Re:they're all terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your input. I guess...

    2. Re:they're all terrorists! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Especially US space junk. For free, one may add!

      Letting others use for free what you throw away... how Un-American!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:they're all terrorists! by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Except.... NASA is allowing it, so Im not really clear what yalls point is.

    4. Re:they're all terrorists! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      NASA is giving something away? For free?

      THOSE COMMIES!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. Hack by ocean_soul · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone read to much xkcd, I see.

    1. Re:Hack by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Its mission ended in 1997 and it was sent a shutdown signal.

      What's the purpose of sending a shutdown signal to an abandoned probe? If it is abandoned, does it matter if you shut it down or not?

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    2. Re:Hack by Taed · · Score: 2

      What's the purpose of sending a shutdown signal to an abandoned probe? If it is abandoned, does it matter if you shut it down or not?

      You have to do a clean shutdown or the memory isn't freed. If the probe were destroyed, that would be memory which could never, ever be allocated by anyone ever again.

      It really starts to add up. A few thousand probes and you're talking hundreds of kilobytes.

    3. Re:Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few thousand probes and you're talking hundreds of kilobytes.

      It all makes sense now.

    4. Re:Hack by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps to keep it from transmitting and interfering with radio astronomy?

  5. Hey - a little red paint, some crash test dummies by jpellino · · Score: 2

    ... it could make a nice chunk of bait for Reavers... jus' sayin'

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  6. 1997 wasn't the age of disco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1997 was the age of glam rock and heavy metal, also rap was begining to make an impact, also plenty of electronic pop.

    1. Re:1997 wasn't the age of disco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1997 was the age of glam rock and heavy metal, also rap was begining to make an impact, also plenty of electronic pop.

      WTF? Glam rock was a 1970's phenomenon, heavy metal from about then too. And rap made its big impacts from the 1980's. What are you smoking?

  7. paywalled article, not the current state by nietsch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Contact has already been made, this has been reported before and the article is 'continued' on a paywalled site.
    Is this again the fault of that badly functioning firehose thingy, or some ill informed editor?

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  8. Salvage or Space Looting by dfn5 · · Score: 2

    Either way, I reckon they should be quick about it before the Alliance shows up.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  9. here is a much better informative link by nietsch · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  10. Lure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're going to "lure" it back?
    Can anyone explain how they plan to lure a spacecraft, or is this some sort of confusion caused by using google translate?

    1. Re:Lure? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's called "hyperbole."

      Also see "anthropomorphism."

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  11. Re:Hey - a little red paint, some crash test dummi by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    What did the Sun Explorer say when it was revived?

    "O, Shiny!" : )

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  12. Fun hack for nerds by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Contacting the spacecraft and getting it to respond is a pretty cool hack. I doubt they'll be able to make it do anything useful, but hey - it makes a good toy to play with.

  13. "Earth Bound" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - three rocket burns in 1986 set it on course to return 28 years later, on Aug. 10, 2014. Dr. Farquhar suggested that a space shuttle could bring it to the ground. NASA even signed an agreement to donate it to the National Air and Space Museum. The rest of NASA, however, was not thinking that far ahead. Now 81, Dr. Farquhar is collaborating with the rescue effort, and he is still thinking ahead. He wants to send ISEE3 out to visit yet another comet. Mr. Wingo protests that it would cost too much money. “We’ll go to the comet,” Dr. Farquhar said. “Trust me.”

    1. Re:"Earth Bound" by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      I don't understand where the costs would be to redirect it to another comet. The time to figure out the math?

    2. Re:"Earth Bound" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mostly in Deep Space Network tracking time. The Original mission to Halley's Comet was so far out, it never heard the command to cycle down all the instruments and since it was solar powered it simply kept transmitting waiting for new orders. (It was a "Long" wait..). NASA was so convinced they wouldn't be able to contact it.. time on the DSN wasn't even booked. After they contacted it the crowd source funding was used to "Purchase" precious time on the DNS to perform the Deep Space Location and Ranging operation.. which will help keep it off the rocky shoals of the Moon. Its passing so close to the Moon it would be flying through the Stratosphere if the Moon had an atmosphere like Earth. Then it has to whip around the Dark side of the Moon and plunge into Darkness for the first time in 36 years, since its batteries are long dead, instruments and transmitters will power down.. and they can only hope it revives when it reaches Daylight on the otherside of the Underworld. If it does it will be home free, taking up a temporary parking orbit in one of the Lagrangian points around Earth forever bathed in Sunlight. But the L5 spot is getting rather crowed and it takes up fuel to maintain a stable space and no collide with anything else.. so they are postulating only a brief stay.. then a push off towards another Sun Diver in a few years.

    3. Re:"Earth Bound" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Farquhar is collaborating with the rescue effort

      Farquhar Fenton Mudd? I thought he resisted rescue efforts?

  14. 1978 by PPH · · Score: 2

    From TFA:

    the Commodores topped the music charts with "Three Times a Lady"

    If we can get Wingo an up to date location to target Justin Bieber, we might see yet another contribution to the arts.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  15. as long as... by murdocj · · Score: 1

    ... it didn't meet and fuse with an alien probe of immense power designed to bring back sterilized soil samples, we're ok.

  16. Big Blue Box, Lots of Time and Space.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. what's not to Like? Who was the Doctor in 1978 and 1986?

    1. Re:Big Blue Box, Lots of Time and Space.. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Tom Baker and Colin Baker, respectively (Fourth and Sixth).

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  17. Civilians? by hubie · · Score: 1

    What does that does that have to do with it? It was civilians who launched it and ran it as well.

    1. Re:Civilians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-guvment types.. people who work for a living

  18. Worth a shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try peanut butter, I'm not sure if it works on dinosaurs, but it works great for mice.

  19. She had nice arches. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > in the McDonald's that used to serve the Navy's Moffett air station

    The McDonald's attracted the military base, not the other way around.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:She had nice arches. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably picked the Mickey D's cause there was lots of perfectly preserved left over Big Mac's from 1985

  20. The IEEE by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    had a ton of papers written with the various commands in them.
    I wonder why they can't put the manual together from those?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:The IEEE by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      I would wager it's because the important word in that sentence is 'had'.

  21. Re:Hey - a little red paint, some crash test dummi by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

    You would want to attract Reavers because...?

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  22. Re:Hey - a little red paint, some crash test dummi by Fishchip · · Score: 1

    Because that's how we're going to deal with the Ukrainian crisis.

  23. n00bs by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

    "No one has the full operating manual anymore, and the fragments are sometimes contradictory."

    Haven't these guys ever RTFM'd before?

    --
    If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.