Slashdot Mirror
EDSAC Diagrams Rediscovered
mikejuk (1801200) writes Due to its importance in the history of computing, the UK's Computer Conservation Society embarked on a 4-year project to build a replica of EDSAC. The main challenge facing the team of volunteers who are working on the rebuild is the lack of documentation. There are almost no original design documents remaining so the rebuild volunteers have to scrutinize photographs to puzzle out which bits go where. However, three years into the project, a set of 19 detailed circuit diagrams have come to light and been handed to the EDSAC team by John Loker, a former engineer in the University of Cambridge Mathematical Laboratory. "I started work as an engineer in the Maths Lab in 1959 just after EDSAC had been decommissioned. In a corridor there was a lot of stuff piled up ready to be thrown away, but amongst it I spotted a roll of circuit diagrams for EDSAC. I'm a collector, so I couldn't resist the urge to rescue them. " In the main, the documents confirm that the team has been correct in most of its re-engineering assumptions, but the drawings have thrown up a few surprises. The most significant discrepancy between the original and the reconstruction that the papers reveal is in the "initial orders" (boot ROM in modern terminology). In the absence of fuller information, the reconstruction team had considered and rejected one possibility which was in fact the one that was used by the original engineers. That will now be rectified in the reconstruction, which is due for completion in late 2015.
Always funny to read about a geek seeing the value in saving something for "historical sake" while a company / university just wants get rid of old "junk"
One man's treasure is another mans junk.
Will interesting to see if the completed project actually works.
Gus Gorman designed his Super computer on a napkin. Just sayin.
It might not be clear to everyone, especially those not from America, but K. S. Kyosuke is talking about penises here. In America, "man treasure" and "family jewels" are slang for the penis and testes. "Junk" is also slang for the combination of the penis, scrotum and testes. So he's saying that the phrase the GP wrote can be translated as "One man's penis is another man's penis."
There are hundreds of millions of them, and apparently they're just as intelligent as white people. (You know, the 'evil', 'racist' whites who want to keep their own countries and live among their own kind - how awful of them!)
So why aren't Africans building computers? Anybody? Is it 'the legacy of slavery', or some other mythical reason?
I had time to go eat lunch, watch Wolverine which is two hours long, come back and there's only one more story on Slashdot?
I would have thought that that interpretation was solely confined to America, and would be completely misunderstood by the entire rest of the World.
"Owning a half-finished spindle does not make you a tailor" as my countrymen say...
Thanks to the two of you for confirming that I'm nothing but an innocent foreigner in this horrible joke!
Ezekiel 23:20
So the they get a few prints of part of the circuits, 9 pages of 150, and they see they made mistakes replicating the original. I wonder how many other mistakes they have made, and what happens if they are finishing and some more drawings surface showing they got stuff wrong? Will they throw it out the wrong and make it as designed or just say "hey good enough, we got most of it right"?
We only have computers because of space. Computers have no use in themselves so we needed the Apollo project to get people interested in computers.
Therefore any reference to "computers" before 1962 is suspect, as it would invalidate the Holy Truth of the Space Spinoffs.
So, did they post scans of these drawings we can download anywhere? Hopefully, after the were almost lost once, they'll see the merit of wide distribution now that they've been found again...
taken over by BSDI encountered whilTe
Interesting -- while I was aware of this meaning of "junk", it didn't occur to me to equate "treasure" with "family jewels". However, "One man's penis is another man's penis" is still a little weird, or at least Siamese.
Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
Since microelectronics, people don't re-wire CPUs anymore...well, they do if it's FPGAs and such. But even in the late 1960s computers were constructed with discrete electronic parts on PCBs. We got a lot of milage out of those vintage machines. I remember hooking up a primitive (by today's standards) logic analyzer to trace signals through the CPU, replacing components such as pulse amplifiers and flip-flops that comprised machine registers. In a research lab setting, it was not uncommon to modify the machines -- for example, new circuits to support dynamic paging (memory bus modifications, associative memory tables, etc.) So I am sure the working EDSAC machine must have had modifications that were not even recorded on these diagrams they have recovered. The story reminds me of a logbook entry that another hacker wrote when repairing the PDP-6 at the MIT AI Lab around 1982. It simply read, "Found wiring here not on schematic. Repaired circuit."
Either to the National Museum of Computing (UK) or the Computer History Museum (US), and scan them so they can be put online.