Slashdot Mirror
AMD FirePro W9100 16GB Workstation GPU Put To the Test
Dputiger (561114) writes "It has been almost two years since AMD launched the FirePro W9000 and kicked off a heated battle in the workstation GPU wars with NVIDIA. AMD recently released the powerful FirePro W9100, however, a new card based on the same Hawaii-class GPU as the desktop R9 290X, but aimed at the professional workstation market. The W9100's GPU features 2,816 stream processors, and the card boasts 320GB/s of memory bandwidth, and six mini-DisplayPorts, all of which support DP1.2 and 4K output. The W9100 carries more RAM than any other AMD GPU as well, a whopping 16GB of GDDR5 on a single card. Even NVIDIA's top-end Quadro K6000 tops out at 12GB, which means AMD sits in a class by itself in this area. In terms of performance, this review shows that the FirePro W9100 doesn't always outshine its competition, but its price/performance ratio keep it firmly in the running. But if AMD continues to improve its product mix and overall software support, it should close the gap even more in the pro GPU market in the next 18-24 months."
But how many KH/s does it do?
any way to use some of that ram as a ram disk?
and out of the gate, they are offering a 50% discount. Pre-approval required.... http://www.fireprographics.com/experience/us/
Is this a new Slashdot advertising site? Or is it the Slashdot review site?
A $3500 video card is news? wtf...
Other than some crazy very specific applications this cards worthless.
From TFA:
Understanding the Workstation Market:
The first thing we need to talk about is the difference between workstation and consumer GPUs. The GPUs themselves are essentially identical -- NVIDIA's Quadro K6000 is based on GK104 (Kepler) the older Quadro 6000 is a GF100 (Fermi)-based chip, the W9000 uses the same GCN core that powers the HD 7970/R9 280X, and today's W9100 is essentially identical to the Hawaii XT core inside the R9 290X. What sets these workstation cards aside are the amount of RAM they carry (typically 2-3x as much as a consumer card), their validation cycles (workstation GPU cores are hammered on far more than the consumer equivalents) and the amount of backend vendor support and optimization that AMD and NVIDIA both perform.
This optimization process and long-term vendor partnership is what distinguishes the workstation market from the consumer space and the need to pay for some of those development costs is part of why workstation cards tend to cost so much more than their consumer equivalents.
This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
Never mind ram disk, imagine how big a print spooler you could have!
As I sit here at my power hungery, but yet fairly slow FX4170 budgeting out a new i7 machine, I have to wonder if they noticed the very large pile of old video chipsetmakers sitting out in the street?
the R series are not that impressive, hell a few of them are outran by their own cheaper older cards, workstation cards are a niche market, even most 3d cad tools like solid works runs reasonably on a integrated intel.
It makes me wonder what they are thinking, there was a time where AMD made a huge variaty of intergrated chips, not anymore. There was a time when AMD was locked in mortal combat with intel, not any more, but hey check out this 3,300$ video card we might sell a dozen of!!!
good luck buddies
Nice writeup but I wish these folks writing these kinds of articles would at least take a look at the graphics they're putting out there. The graphs are senseless drivel and you don't know if the new card is better or worse. It's still a nice card but here's a better write up at Toms Hardware.
Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
Wow, TFS is copied almost verbatim from the first two paragraphs of TFA. The only difference is the awkward cutting and editing that ultimately contort and torture the prose in TFA.
Way to add value, editors!
How well did they do? You decide! From TFA:
It has been almost two years since AMD launched the FirePro W9000 and kicked off a new battle in the workstation GPU wars. Today, we're reviewing the company's FirePro W9100 -- a new card based on the same Hawaii-class GPU as the desktop R9 290 and R9 290X, but aimed at the workstation market and professional consumers. Does AMD's new card have what it takes to seize the professional performance crown?
The W9100 is a full Hawaii GPU with 2,816 stream processors, 320GB/s of memory bandwidth, and six mini-DisplayPorts, all of which support DP1.2 and 4K output. It carries more RAM than any other AMD GPU -- a whopping 16GB of GDDR5 on a single card. Even NVIDIA's top-end Quadro K6000 tops out at 12GB, which means AMD sits in a class by itself in this area. The W9000 and W9100 have one other major point of differentiation -- each offers support for up to six 4K displays using DisplayPort 1.2. NVIDIA's top-end Quadro K6000 tops out at just two DP 1.2 ports. You can still theoretically run more DisplayPort 1.2 displays if you use a hub, but if you want to hook everything up through the video card, AMD has a distinct advantage here.
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
Seriously, the release of the W9100 means the 2013 Mac Pro no longer has the latest FirePro chipset in it ... making it a great opportunity to see if Apple will actually release video card upgrades for this machine, or if it's true that owners will just be stuck with whatever was ordered with it.
I'm always so impressed when AMD manages to compete against Nvidia while AMD is only one tenth the size, they have far less resources to invest back into R&D and yet every generation they show up to the ring with a worthy entry ready for another fight. Both my GPU and CPU are AMD make, I love supporting the underdog.
From each company profile on their respective web sites:
AMD = 10,700 people
NVIDIA = 8,800 people