Meet LibreOffice Volunteer Robinson Tryon (Video)
When Slashdot's Tim Lord went to Texas Linux Fest, one of the people he met there was Robinson Tryon. He's a volunteer with LibreOffice, and in this conversation he gave us a nice look at what's going on these days with LibreOffice and its parent organization, The Document Foundation. (Alternate Video Link)
If you can't figure out your web site's font issue, how do you expect us to believe you can code a full-blown word processor?
(This: "For everyone experiencing weird font issues on our website please know we are investigating the issue since several weeks")
Does your webmaster do all your coding, as well?
Beta has them too. Instead of symols for the buttons I get hex codes, the default replacement in firefox when the font has no symbol for that char.
If you can't figure out your web site's font issue, how do you expect us to believe you can code a full-blown word processor?
If you ask me, this problem is a political problem, not just a technical one. At some point, you just have to be willing to let go of some of your Firefox users with weird fonts installed. It's not like LibreOffice can afford to rewrite Firefox from scratch.
Someone volunteering his time on a software project this big is denied a livable wage and health insurance, and by giving his labor away, he's devaluing the work of other engineers. It's one thing if a developer is scratching a personal itch by working on a small Unix tool like the original GNU crowd, but LibreOffice is a major project whose charges are picked up and used by big business. Just look at how Oracle supports OpenOffice to see the value of the codebase. If it's so in-demand, why not get paid for it?
LibreOffice is a huge project. What makes you think he handles the fonts on LibreOffice? And even if he does, coding an application and writing a webpage are two very different problems.
Is there a place where I can view this without installing spyware?
But in addition to word-processing, spreadsheets and presentations, my office also requires email.
It's long overdue somebody steps up to this challenge.
The site is almost unreadable in some cases (Win7/FF which is what I have to use at work): letters missing, big gaps, and a complete mess. It's obviously some horrid incompatibility with something, but the lack of QA is simply embarrassing. This has been going on for months, but as much as I've been wanting to report it, all I found is file a bug report against LO, which doesn't seem right.
--Udo.
Given the lack of a single dominant mobile office suite, there are potentially more users out there for a LibreOffice version for Android than for users of the Windows, Mac and Linux versions combined. So why's the Android version forever stuck in demoware limbo?
Woo hoo! I finally made it to the front page of Slashdot! I am feeling a bit petrified :-)
A couple of quick announcements:
Cheers,
Robinson Tryon
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
Senior QA Bug Wrangler
The Document Foundation
coding is life
What in the hell do you expect when you use that Microsoft garbage? It looks fine under Firefox with both Linux and OSX. Blame yourself for using a buggy OS then expecting the applications to work-around all of the Microsoft-created problems.
The website looks decently fine. Plus, other open-source projects are also amazing but have shitty crappy looking websites.
Even Microsoft's operating system Metro interface doesn't look all that good, yet the proprietary MSOffice is still pretty decent.
@qubit - I hope you are able to carry this message.
The success of LibreOffice hinges on one thing and one thing alone - the Spreadsheet.
When you look at the Doc and Presentation apps, you are seeing something that has a huge number of viable alternatives - both online and offline.
But Excel has no alternative - I'm talking about Excel in all its glory and macro horror. The absence of Excel compatibility is the SINGLE reason why every business in India is not on Linux already.
LibreOffice Spreadsheet is ultimately the key to open source growth around the world. Remember Windows and Mac have native MS Office versions available, but Linux has none. So its basically "LibreOffice or Windows" for Linux users.
It looks ok on FF+Linux here. /. Beta has problems, I often see those domino hex characters and wonder what they are (I suppose they're the logos for Facebook, Twitter etc.).
M$ has a long history of not respecting standards. Maybe that's why fonts look ugly.
Actually, I've read it elsewhere, M$ Windows relies on corrections on font data to get a good font display, whereas Linux (and supposedly OSX) has a better software to render the characters and does not need "cooked up" data. Those new M$ fonts (Candara, Cambria etc.) are very well crafted and look the best on Windows exactly for that reason (they are best with Cleartype). OTOH, deactivating anti-aliasing makes them very ugly (unusable IMHO).
Nowadays and out-of-the-box, Linux looks a lot better than Windows. I don't know what would be necessary to reach the OS X level, if we aren't there already.
It's interesting to notice that, as pixel density increases, most of these problems will vanish. If Windows is still sold when we have cheap 400 dpi on desktops, we might get good Windows character rendering, because there will be much less need for hints.