Slashdot Mirror


Survivors' Blood Holds Promise, But Draws Critics, As Ebola Treatment

As reported by The Los Angeles Times, the World Health Organization is endorsing blood transfusions from Ebola survivors as a treatment for those currently infected. The idea behind blood transfusion is similar to vaccination by other means, though (at least as discussed here) administered only after a patient has been infected: "The blood plasma of people who have recovered from Ebola contains antibodies that were successful in fighting off the virus. If these antibodies are pumped into an infected person, they might help the recipient fight the disease as well." The article mentions that while there is little evidence to back the efficacy in preventing Ebola, "Transfusions were used to treat a small number of patients during the 1995 Kikwit Ebola outbreak in Zaire, now known as the Democratic Republic of Congo, according to Dr. Oyewale Tomori, a professor of virology at Redeemer's University in Nigeria. A study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases after the outbreak reported that eight patients received transfusions, and only one of them died."

The idea of blood transfusions has critics, too: Dr. William Shaffner of Vanderbilt University is skeptical, saying he was surprised that the WHO would make transfusions a priority in the ongoing crisis because they are labor-intensive, making it difficult to serve a large number of patients. "You can't do this en masse," Schaffner said. "This is going to be a desperate attempt to provide something for a relatively small number of patients." Finding suitable donors may also prove more challenging than WHO officials expect, he warned. Malnutrition and other health concerns could make it more difficult to draw blood from people. "These are people who have recovered from Ebola," Schaffner said. "When are they hale and hearty enough to actually do a donation?"

55 comments

  1. Hire the recovered patients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am wondering for some time.

    I think recovered patience are not contagious anymore, and can likely not be infected again.
    Why not hire them en mass as desperately needed hospital staff.
    Even if it is just for basic care of the infected patients.

    1. Re:Hire the recovered patients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good news! You just survived a horrible disease that has left your body ravaged. You can clean yourself up and not have to lie in your own waste.

      Now the bad news. We want to drain your blood, and we want you to clean up the waste gushing out of other people's bodies. How can you turn that down? Now pull yourself together and get over yourself.

    2. Re:Hire the recovered patients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now the bad news. We want to drain your blood, and we want you to clean up the waste gushing out of other people's bodies. How can you turn that down? Now pull yourself together and get over yourself.

      Can anyone see what the next dystopian movie is going to be about?

    3. Re:Hire the recovered patients by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, you could always pay them money. I gather saving lives is considered valuable in some quarters.

    4. Re:Hire the recovered patients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At first I wasn't sure but it turns out that yes, you are immune. According to the abstract of one paper I saw while googling around, at least 10 years of immunity. Another article explained that the currently recovered Americans will have to go through months of rehab. Apparently, the disease causes muscle tissue loss. They may have aches and pains ongoing, but it sounds like they could still function well.

      A big part of the problem is that this good an outcome is due to advanced care. That kind of care isn't available in Africa. However, as more recoveries become available, there might be a feedback effect. Train the first recovered people well not just in Ebola treatment, but as general health aids or even nurses and doctors if they're qualified. That way, if Ebola strikes again they're covered. If it doesn't strike again, Africa gets more home-grown medical personnel. Sounds like a win-win... except of course for the Ebola part.

    5. Re:Hire the recovered patients by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And isn't all this a good example of how Darwinism works? The survivors have proven that they can beat the disease and their genes will be more likely to spread causing the next outbreak of this strain in the future to be less serious.

      Cruel - yes, but nature is cruel and doesn't have favorites.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:Hire the recovered patients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are, what, 5 different strains of this thing? And they're too different -- even complete immunity to one won't protect at all against the others.

      Good luck!

    7. Re:Hire the recovered patients by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      They may have aches and pains ongoing, but it sounds like they could still function well

      One of the early symptoms is that you slough off the lining of your intestines. The euphemistic "bloody diarrhoea" is the lining falling off your gut and falling out of your arse. Not to mention the blood pissing out of every orifice, including many of your sweat glands.

      Good luck recovering from that in a couple of months. Yeah, straight back to work as a serum mule!

      After the way that haemorrhagic virus tends to make all your blood vessels thin-walled and porous, just getting a line in for taking a blood sample is likely to be a challenge.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Dear Timothy by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

    Survivors' Blood Holds Promise, But Draws Critics, As Ebola Treatment

    Survivors' blood holds promise as Ebola treatment, but draws critics

    Following Slashdot via RSS feed isn't without some level of cognitive pain.

    (or as Tim would put it: Following Slashdot Isn't Without Some Level Of Pain, Via RSS Feed)

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    1. Re:Dear Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFY -

      Following Slashdot, Levels of Pain, Some without, Via RSS Feed

  3. Dr. William Shaffner? by JamesA · · Score: 2

    What a great name. Sounds like what William Shatner would introduce himself as after a few drinks...

    1. Re:Dr. William Shaffner? by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Completely offtopic but I suddenly want someone to make a movie about the making of the original Star Trek series just so they can cast this guy as Shatner.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  4. It sems that .... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... Elizabeth Bathory may have been onto something after all.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  5. Shaffner upside down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you turn the two f's upside down they become t's. Shattner. Just sayin'.

  6. A Priority by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    So according to Shaffner because it is not a solution to the whole problem we should not do it at all. I think he missed the difference between "a priority" and "the priority". WHO can have a number of priority projects that each only handle part of the problem. Together the projects me be able to handle most if not all the problems.

    1. Re:A Priority by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      There's a serious ethical problem with allocating scarce healthcare resources, particularly those in theatre to ideas that have no evidence of being worth trying. There's also significant risk from blood infusions being done improperly, including infecting more healthcare workers who then may end up in close proximity to ebola patients even longer.

      If this were being done in a 3rd party country - e.g. the UK or the US or spain, where a blood transfusion or two, even under the most stringent of containment procedures is a very marginal cost I'd say sure, you may as well try. But when you're talking about potentially thousands of infusions on thousands of patients in poor countries, in facilities that are suffering shortages of staff because staff keep dying, and suffering in sanitation, and well... it may not be a great idea.

      If you save one patient with a blood transfusion but kill 2 others who accidentally get infected you're not really doing a good thing.

    2. Re:A Priority by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a serious ethical problem with allocating scarce healthcare resources, particularly those in theatre to ideas that have no evidence of being worth trying.

      It has been done during the 1995 Kikwit Ebola outbreak in Zaire. They tried it on eight patients and only one died. I have found no indication that any health care workers were infected. Notice the transfusions were done in Zaire. Also notice the ebola funding has increased quite rapidly.

      As to numbers, There have only been 4,000 cases so far. Maybe a few hundred could be treated with transfusions and have their lives saved. Why deny them that? This is not an immunization treatment and therefore will only be used on already sick people. Restricting the practice to medical facilities that can handle the procedure will restrict if not eliminate infections of health care workers. Fewer people will be treated but it will be much safer.

      If you save one patient with a blood transfusion but kill 2 others who accidentally get infected you're not really doing a good thing.

      It you treat a few hundred people under restricted conditions and they live then it is a good thing.

    3. Re:A Priority by Guppy · · Score: 3, Informative

      It has been done during the 1995 Kikwit Ebola outbreak in Zaire. They tried it on eight patients and only one died. I have found no indication that any health care workers were infected.

      Just in case anyone is curious, here is the actual paper: http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/...

      Between 6 and 22 June 1995, 8 patients in Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo, who met the case definition used in Kikwit for Ebola (EBO) hemorrhagic fever, were transfused with blood donated by 5 convalescent patients. The donated blood contained IgG EBO antibodies but no EBO antigen. EBO antigens were detected in all the transfusion recipients just before transfusion. The 8 transfused patients had clinical symptoms similar to those of other EBO patients seen during the epidemic. All were seriously ill with severe asthenia, 4 presented with hemorrhagic manifestations, and 2 became comatose as their disease progressed. Only 1 transfused patient (12.5%) died; this number is significantly lower than the overall case fatality rate (80%) for the EBO epidemic in Kikwit and than the rates for other EBO epidemics.

    4. Re:A Priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I would never accept a blood transfusion from black Africans, but I suppose dying of a bunch of STDs 10-20 years down the road is better than dying of ebola now.

  7. Doesn't make sense to me by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this would help. The only results of this I can see are:
    - receiver develops antibodies to fight against the diners antibodies
    - temporary protection against Ebola until the doner antibodies are consumed

    Either way, i don't see how this will provide immunity, since the receivers body isn't actually learning what to do to fight Ebola.

    Can someone, preferably an actual doctor or immunologist, clarify?

    1. Re:Doesn't make sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might just give the patient more time to produce his own antibodies. If I'm not mistaken, the experimental treatment used on some western patients is basically antibodies.

    2. Re:Doesn't make sense to me by jklovanc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As reported by The Los Angeles Times, the World Health Organization is endorsing blood transfusions from Ebola survivors as a treatment for those currently infected.

      Notice they said "treatment" and not "cure". The antibodies will be used up but may give the body enough time to fight off the infection. It is not about impunity it is about survival.

    3. Re:Doesn't make sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Infection control" doesn't do anything for the infected. It leaves them to die in squalor. Patients and their families are already rebelling against the bad conditions in hospitals. Some of them have escaped to die with their families -- "with" meaning their families will die with them, and the virus will be spread further. A remarkably stupid choice but it's a reality. So I think it's important to give infected people some perspective, some glimmer of hope. Blood tranfusions could be a part of that, along with ZMapp mass trials. Another argument for treating even a small number of patients is collection of scientific evidence. We need to start fighting Ebola. Not just try to contain it and force infected people to die in internment camps, that's unworthy of a civilized society.

    4. Re:Doesn't make sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Infection control" doesn't do anything for the infected.

      Infection control is the single best thing we can do for the infected. It keeps the problem small and focused, allowing the world to concentrate its finite medics and resources into the infected regions. This is the only way these people are going to get help.

      And if they think their situation is bad now, and reject or sabotage quarantines, then they're going to love when the rest of the world gets infected and suddenly decides to recall all their doctors to fix their domestic problems. If you think West Africa is suffering now, think how bad it would be without any WHO aid or workers.

      A more fair criticism would be that we haven't done enough to support the people inside the quarantined regions. I can certainly agree with that view. If you're trapped inside an open air prison with no food sources, then there's really no difference from dying of ebola or dying of starvation. Dead is dead. We really should be ramping up food drops to these places, at the very least.

    5. Re:Doesn't make sense to me by Guppy · · Score: 2

      Neither the summary or the linked article use the term, but what they're using is known as "convalescent serum". As the parent poster stated above, it's been in use for over a century now, but has only fallen out of fashion in modern times -- mainly because it has been superseded by vaccines and anti-infectives that are cheaper, more reliable, more convenient, and easier to mass-produce.

      Trivia note: While Type-O may be the universal blood donor, the ideal serum donor is Type AB.

    6. Re:Doesn't make sense to me by u38cg · · Score: 1

      People usually die before their body produces its own antibodies. Receiving someone else's antibodies will not stop their body producing them.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  8. 48 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow it reminds me of the book '48 by James Herbert

  9. Hasty blood transfusions in Africa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Hasty blood transfusions in Africa. by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      The Big Pharma Dilemma. The problem of getting the blood from the survivors without having to pay them.

    2. Re:Hasty blood transfusions in Africa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt any pharmacy company is worried. As soon as someone spends billions of dollars to develop an effective vaccine against Ebola the drug will be pirated anyway.

  10. zombie effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there has been lots of old news out of africa about mobs hunting down albinos so they can eat them for magical power.
    Also, how aids infected men rape young girls, hoping that that would cure them of aids.
    If you are an ebola survivor, good luck to you.

  11. Why just Ebola? by quantaman · · Score: 2

    Couldn't this approach be used for any infectious disease for which there's no effective cure but there are some survivors? Are there just no Western diseases that fit the profile? I suppose you need both a person sick with a deadly infection and a recent survivor of a same infection (with the same blood type). So it may just be the case that we simply don't experience that scenario enough to develop this solution. But I'm curious if this approach has been used outside of Ebola in Africa.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Why just Ebola? by jklovanc · · Score: 3, Informative

      It has been done and quite successfully.

    2. Re:Why just Ebola? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The best treatment for distemper in dogs uses something similar: healthy dog is injected with Newcastle vaccine (yes, the stuff for chickens). Serum is harvested and given to a dog with active distemper infection. As yet this treatment is rarely used, but the recovery rate is very high (and extremely rapid), vs a high mortality rate with ordinary supportive hospitalization. Why this works is not entirely understood.

      http://www.edbond.com/antidist...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  12. Perfection is the enemy of the good. by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While it is true that there are any number of ways that the implementation of this could go horribly wrong in West Africa, the hard fact remains that they really don't have any other options. There's no "blue pill fairy" that's going to swoop down and save them. This isn't some episode of TNG where they can just technobabble their way out of the problem.

    This may be a crazy hair brained idea but it seems to be the best thing they have going.

    We ran out of the magical ebola drug after just 2 patients. Waiting on Big Pharma is probably not a good idea.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  13. Art beats Life by deadweight · · Score: 1

    They already did this on the Last Ship to save themselves from an Ebola-like virus.

  14. Dealth by Ebola or AIDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roll the dice. That plasma might contain HIV that go undetected in the screening process. This is Africa we're talking about.

    1. Re:Dealth by Ebola or AIDS by rs79 · · Score: 1

      People live with HIV. Ebola, not so much.

      In 1933 the only psychiatrist to ever win a Nobel prize did so for discovering Malaria cures syphilitic dementia. Malaria is no joy but it's better than your brains turning to soup (three years later antibiotics were discovered).

      You might die of HIV. You will almost certainly die of Ebola.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  15. Doesn't make sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Historically, transfusions of various sorts were often used to confer passive acquired immunity against and thereby treat a lot of infectious diseases, starting with diphtheria during the late 19th century. It's a well-accepted principle, and immunoglobulins (i.e. antibodies) are still part of what you're getting if you ever need rabies shots. The debate here comes in (at least among actual practitioners of medicine and public health) with the fact that there's not enough data to say whether it will safe and effective for Ebola particular. It's also high-risk, and expensive compared with the well-proven methods of infection control that organizations like MSF are trying to get anyone who will listen to fund.

    Also, an immunologist is a type of physician. (I'm not an immunologist, I do emergency medicine.)

  16. Send me your contracts by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    -- regards,
    Count Dracula

  17. Wait... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Dr. WHO?

  18. Read the paper yourself and make your own mind up. by rs79 · · Score: 1

    Say you've been told you have Ebola but have read this. What do you do?

    http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/...

    Say, "oh, it sounds too risky, I'll tough it out"? I'm guessing not.

    Any chance this is astroturfing for the company with the Ebola drug? The natural antibodies are a fierce competition to what is now a multi billion dollar market.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  19. Humoral vs. Cell-mediated Immune responses by Guppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Couldn't this approach be used for any infectious disease for which there's no effective cure but there are some survivors? Are there just no Western diseases that fit the profile? I suppose you need both a person sick with a deadly infection and a recent survivor of a same infection (with the same blood type). So it may just be the case that we simply don't experience that scenario enough to develop this solution. But I'm curious if this approach has been used outside of Ebola in Africa.

    It's not used much today, because we've largely conquered the disease agents that such an approach works against. Typically, it works well against infectious agents which are highly vulnerable to a Humoral (antibody-mediated) immune response. Co-incidentally, this also means most vaccines work extremely well against those same disease agents. Unfortunately, Ebola doesn't yet have a commercially available vaccine, but I would expect such a vaccine to work well.

    There are only a few examples in the West where we still use this approach -- one that I can think of, is the use of anti-HepB sera in infants born to infected mothers, and for emergency prophylaxis of needlestick injuries involving Hepatitis B exposure. For the bulk of the population, Hepatitis B vaccination works well enough (and is far cheaper).

    What it doesn't work well against, are infectious agents that don't respond well to natural antibody defenses. For instance, most anti-HIV antibodies do not defend well against HIV, anti-HepC antibodies do not protect against Hepatitis C, nor do anti-TB antibodies protect against Tuberculosis. For those agents, an effective response depends on cell-mediated immunity.

  20. I have been wondering for some time, too by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    I am wondering for some time

    Truth is that nobody has any clue as to how to contain this ebola epidermic in West Africa

    The fact that WHO came out with this "blood transfusion" idea tells us that they have run out of ideas on what to do next

    Liberia is issuing a total clamp down on its local population for 3 days, starting September 18th - which in theory can allow the medical personnel to check who is sick, who is not, who to isolate, and whatnot - but which will not work in the reality since there are so many unknowns, so many other things that nobody has yet to considered that will come into play when the things actually transpire

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:I have been wondering for some time, too by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Truth is that nobody has any clue as to how to contain this ebola epidermic in West Africa

      You contradict yourself. The solution is well-known. Quarantine.

      It is just politically unacceptable, and there's a high probability of there not being enough troops to enact the quarantine by shooting people trying to escape. Which raises another problem ; having shot them, what do you do with the potentially infectious bodies?

      And, who is going to order sovereign nations (four, so far, including a nation of around 100million people) to close their borders and shoot their own population?

      But quarantine does have a long and good track record.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  21. Exactly. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... give the patient more time to produce his own antibodies. ... the experimental treatment used on some western patients is basically antibodies.

    Right on both counts.

      - Much of why Ebola is so often fatal is that it produces a glycoprotein that interferes with immune system signaling, reducing and delaying the immune system's antibody-mediated specific responses. (Meanwhile the cell damage and foreign protein stimulate the GENERAL responses, which causes self-damage to the body and aids in spreading the infection.) Details on Wikipedia Keeping the virus population and the glycoprotien concentration down by supplying ready-to-go antibodies holds down cell death from infection, self-destruction, and signaliing interference, giving the immune system more time and ability to respond.

      - The drug in question is a mix of three monoclonal antibodies, manufactured by stock genetic engineering techniques.

    Injections of extracted antibodies, or blood containing them, has a long history in medicine. They have been used against bacteria, viruses, and poisons such as snake venom. Typically they are made by extracting a blood fraction containing antibodies from an animal which has been recently immunized - and is currently hyper-reactive to - the target disease agent or venom. (This gets a load of mixed antibodies which is heavy with those specific to the target.) They may also be extracted from a human survivor of a disease of interest, or a human in general. (These you might hear being called "human imune globin" or "gamma globulin".)

    Downsides include allergic reactions to the animal used (typically a horse) or person providing the globulin, infection with blood-borne diseases (such as Hepatitis C), and reaction against the patient by some antibody in the serum.

    Antiseura fell out of use for bacteria with the rise of antibiotics (even for diseases, such as menningitis, where antiseurm treatment had higher success rates). Antiviral drugs and the rise of a number of human viral diseases are pushing it down in preference for viral disease treatments - though better blood tests for viral infections is improving its safety. Nothing, of course, has replaced it for antivenom. It's still used for things like Hepatitis A, Measles, rabies exposure, supplement for certain immune difficiencies, and modulating immune system rejection of liver transplants.

    With both the rise of antibiotic and antiviral drug resistance and the development of monoclonal antibody culture (prodcing just the desired antibodies to a target on an industrial scale, with negligible risk of dangerous contamination), expect more use of antiseura in medicine - like this "new experimental ebola drug".

    Meanwhile, using antibodies extracted from ebola survivors - or transfusions if a matching donor is available - is the same system and might work just fine. And the technology is simple and cheap enough to be available even in third world countries.

    Of course you need to wait until the survivor has recovered enough to have built up antibodies and enough blood to spare. Ideally you should also wait until the virus has cleared. (For instance, with Ebola, semen remains infective for at least two months, so blood likely does. as well.) But if the patient is already infected and likely to die without treatment, that's not an issue.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  22. Re:Read the paper yourself and make your own mind by Firethorn · · Score: 2

    Any chance this is astroturfing for the company with the Ebola drug? The natural antibodies are a fierce competition to what is now a multi billion dollar market.

    Probably not. Shaffer is probably just the mandatory idiot(relatively) to provide 'the other side' of the story.

    As for a 'multi billion dollar market', not quite. It's worth a few tens of millions of dollars a year at most. Ebola, for all it's deadliness isn't very transmissive in humans and averages less than a hundred deaths a year - and only a few more infections. It's flashy and attention getting, but pretty much every major infection disease that most people survive kills more on an annual basis. Malaria reliably kills tens of thousands every year. Lots of money there in comparison.

    Breaking down his arguments:
    labor-intensive: Due to the small number of patients and Africa's poor wealth, labor intensive isn't as big of a deal-breaker as it would be in the USA. They typically have labor, just not much else.
    'difficult to serve a large number of patients' - Well, it's a good thing that not a lot of people catch it, right?
    'suitable donors' - given survival rates, a very valid concern, but if you can get the death rate down it becomes much easier. Especially if you can get a native doctor or three who have been infected and recovered. Continued exposure will maintain immune response.
    'Malnutrition and other health concerns' - Like said elsewhere, it's not like you have much choice. Just make sure you feed your surviving patient X properly so they can donate blood on schedule.
    'When are they healthy enough to donate blood' - I'd go with 'When their doctor says so'.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  23. Vampirism by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    "These are people who have recovered from Ebola," Schaffner said. "When are they hale and hearty enough to actually do a donation?"

    Depends. how much blood do you need?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. About as scientific as 'vaccination'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. Just like the FRAUD Jenner and his made up 'cure' that wasn't a cure at all, this is just more superstitious nonsense.

    http://www.whale.to/v/hadwen1.html

    Presumably there is at least ONE rebuttal of Dr Hadwen's talks, somewhere on the internet? I can't seem to find any...

  25. Survivors' Blood Holds Promise, But Draws Critics, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah $#@% right...why go to all the trouble to use this "labor intensive" method? How else are you going to purposely transmit the desease around the world. well, you know, besides flying the patients back to their home countries to be harvested by NWO ghouls like the cdc. Flying pig flu not doing the trick?

  26. HOW I GOT CURE FROM HIV WITH THE HELP OF DR OBAZE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My name is FERDINARD LUCAS, I don't no how to tell the world the greatest thing that happen in my life.I was so sick that I lose all the money I have in so many hospital still yet there was no solutions on till I go for blood test for different hospital almost Eight doctors told me I am H.I.V positive. And after then all hope I have was lost, I was waiting for death to come. One night I woke up in middle of the night started crying so my mind told me to check in Google so I see many testimony about. DR OBAZE I was doubting if the man is real, he is a great man but just because of the testimony of his good news.I said let me try and email him he reply me back I told him my problems he said that he will reply me back ten minute time after he consult the oracle. So he reply me after ten minute and told me the doctors were says the truth of my blood test. He said it was spiritual H.I.V. I was having that he can be able to help me. So I respond to all the things he ask me to do. then he ask me if i need spell casting or herbal cure then i choose herbal.after all the preparation then he send the herbal cure and i do according to what he said and i believe he can cure my illness. after using the herbs, i call him that i am through with the herbs and he tell me to go for checkup in three different hospital the doctors were wonder and told me I am now H.I.V. Negative..he is specialize on HIV,cancer,love spell,work promotion,magic miracle and metal problem. I am very very happy to thank DR OBAZE for doing great thing in my life thank ones again I will never forget you. am grateful.if you are also passing through the same pain that i was please contact the great man via this
    Email=obazespiritualspelltemple@hotmail.com
    Web site=http://obazespiritualspelltemple.webs.com
    Phone number=+2348157905793
    Or you can email me=ferdinardlucas@gmail.com
    REGARDS
    FERDINARD LUCAS.

  27. Hire the recovered patients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My name is FERDINARD LUCAS, I don't no how to tell the world the greatest thing that happen in my life.I was so sick that I lose all the money I have in so many hospital still yet there was no solutions on till I go for blood test for different hospital almost Eight doctors told me I am H.I.V positive. And after then all hope I have was lost, I was waiting for death to come. One night I woke up in middle of the night started crying so my mind told me to check in Google so I see many testimony about. DR OBAZE I was doubting if the man is real, he is a great man but just because of the testimony of his good news.I said let me try and email him he reply me back I told him my problems he said that he will reply me back ten minute time after he consult the oracle. So he reply me after ten minute and told me the doctors were says the truth of my blood test. He said it was spiritual H.I.V. I was having that he can be able to help me. So I respond to all the things he ask me to do. then he ask me if i need spell casting or herbal cure then i choose herbal.after all the preparation then he send the herbal cure and i do according to what he said and i believe he can cure my illness. after using the herbs, i call him that i am through with the herbs and he tell me to go for checkup in three different hospital the doctors were wonder and told me I am now H.I.V. Negative..he is specialize on HIV,cancer,love spell,work promotion,magic miracle and metal problem. I am very very happy to thank DR OBAZE for doing great thing in my life thank ones again I will never forget you. am grateful.if you are also passing through the same pain that i was please contact the great man via this
    Email=obazespiritualspelltemple@hotmail.com
    Web site=http://obazespiritualspelltemple.webs.com
    Phone number=+2348157905793
    Or you can email me=ferdinardlucas@gmail.com
    REGARDS
    FERDINARD LUCAS..

  28. Re:Read the paper yourself and make your own mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My name is FERDINARD LUCAS, I don't no how to tell the world the greatest thing that happen in my life.I was so sick that I lose all the money I have in so many hospital still yet there was no solutions on till I go for blood test for different hospital almost Eight doctors told me I am H.I.V positive. And after then all hope I have was lost, I was waiting for death to come. One night I woke up in middle of the night started crying so my mind told me to check in Google so I see many testimony about. DR OBAZE I was doubting if the man is real, he is a great man but just because of the testimony of his good news.I said let me try and email him he reply me back I told him my problems he said that he will reply me back ten minute time after he consult the oracle. So he reply me after ten minute and told me the doctors were says the truth of my blood test. He said it was spiritual H.I.V. I was having that he can be able to help me. So I respond to all the things he ask me to do. then he ask me if i need spell casting or herbal cure then i choose herbal.after all the preparation then he send the herbal cure and i do according to what he said and i believe he can cure my illness. after using the herbs, i call him that i am through with the herbs and he tell me to go for checkup in three different hospital the doctors were wonder and told me I am now H.I.V. Negative..he is specialize on HIV,cancer,love spell,work promotion,magic miracle and metal problem. I am very very happy to thank DR OBAZE for doing great thing in my life thank ones again I will never forget you. am grateful.if you are also passing through the same pain that i was please contact the great man via this
    Email=obazespiritualspelltemple@hotmail.com
    Web site=http://obazespiritualspelltemple.webs.com
    Phone number=+2348157905793
    Or you can email me=ferdinardlucas@gmail.com
    REGARDS.
    FERDINARD LUCAS.