Slashdot Mirror


Chinese City Sets Up "No Cell Phone" Pedestrian Lanes

An anonymous reader writes The Chinese city of Chongqing has created a smartphone sidewalk lane, offering a path for those too caught up in messaging and tweeting to watch where they're going. "There are lots of elderly people and children in our street, and walking with your cell phone may cause unnecessary collisions here," said Nong Cheng, a spokeswoman for the district's property management company. However, she clarified that the initiative was meant to be a satirical way to highlight the dangers of texting and walking.

46 comments

  1. Totalitarian government: by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Funny

    It finally pays off.

    1. Re:Totalitarian government: by Yakasha · · Score: 1

      It finally pays off.

      You just ruined 3 jokes that popped in my head about this. Thanks for the lols. ;)

    2. Re:Totalitarian government: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh

    3. Re:Totalitarian government: by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I just wish all the posts that make sidewalks into rat mazes, are put into that one lane.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:Totalitarian government: by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Well they must have very nice wide sidewalks to be able to divide them up like that.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. ChongQing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They've got the best traffic lights/timers/redlight camera system in place.

    If everywhere did that, we'd stop hearing so much BS.

    1. Re:ChongQing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, have best!

    2. Re:ChongQing by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Yea. All is costs is money.

      Cha Ching!

    3. Re:ChongQing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cha Ching!

      That's racist!

    4. Re:ChongQing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Cha Chink! is racist.

    5. Re:ChongQing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, is your name Tom Hath, or Cha Ching? I'm confused. Let me know at your earliest convenience.

      Thanks,
      Sum Ting Wong

  3. The next major city project by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...she clarified that the initiative was meant to be a satirical way to highlight the dangers of texting and walking."

    Regardless of the original intent, if it is a device that allows human beings to ignore each other and stay tethered to social media with even greater efficiency, there will be no amount of money or time large enough to stand in the way of budgeting or building it.

    What started out as a joke will become the next major city project.

    1. Re:The next major city project by Lesrahpem · · Score: 1

      Finally! A government admits it's policy is intended as satire! Kafka is doing the Green Back Boogie in his grave.

    2. Re:The next major city project by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Replyng to undo faulty moderation

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:The next major city project by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      Our priorities are so fucked.

  4. Of course. by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 1

    may cause unnecessary collisions here

    As opposed to the necessary ones.

    1. Re:Of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99 % o/t but I do know of one "necessary" collision between pedestrians. Once when I was walking on a pretty crowded street, I saw a guy pretty much intentionally bumping into as many people as possible (from all demographic groups) and did so pretty hard. Now, I'm a pretty strong guy but don't look like it (always amusing when doing bench press at the gym) and with winter clothes on, I probably looked just "normal" (or weaker) to him and I intentionally went to stand at the bus stop he was headed for and made sure that he could opt to bump into me too. Being prepared, I also took position so that he would hit the tip of my shoulder to make it hurt more. BAM! So he did and did it so hard that he fell over. Because his "act" (if you can call it that) was that he just accidentally bumped into people, he chose to just get up, brush off the snow and continue walking without saying a word (but I didn't see him bump into others anymore). Obviously he couldn't tell me to "watch where I'm going" (or whatever) because I was the one that stood still when he came as a bowling ball intent on hitting yet another pin. I think that was a necessary collision. I also felt some (arguably childish) satisfaction because when I grew up, I was a weak and somewhat fat kid (and you know what that means, even more so, if you add geek to it). In my early 20s I, however, became very, very fond of going to the gym (I genuinely began to like exercise despite having hated it all my life up to that point).

    2. Re:Of course. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Oh personally I think collisions between people who don't look where they're walking and run into each other are highly necessary. Some people need to feel that they're acting stupidly.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an older asian guy (maybe chinese) guy doing something like that in seattle. He had his elbows raised, pointed out, elbowing anyone who walked near enough to him. Someone is not going to have a sense of humor and put him in the hospital. It's just inevitable.

    4. Re:Of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're far too kind. If it had been me, I'd have knocked the guy out and then stomped his face in while he was on the ground.

  5. This seems oddly familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://improveverywhere.com/2010/06/08/the-tourist :)

  6. Amazing idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's another one
    We're entering an age of innovation. There's no question!

  7. Its about damn time!! by Obscene_CNN · · Score: 1

    Its about damn time!!

    --
    I don't want to do a sig now
  8. Send them into traffic by Morpeth · · Score: 1

    ... seriously, sent the texting/chatting group into a lane that walks them right into traffic. That way, you address China's population problem, and you remove lots of idiots from the genepool (hopefully), or at least take out some of those who endanger the rest of us (I can only imagine how those types drive...). The one's who don't walk into traffic survive their Darwinism test.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    1. Re:Send them into traffic by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      A better way is to remove all the current crosswalks from intersections and randomly move them between 0-10 feet down the road. That way a pedestrian needs to look before walking out. Should clean up the problem quite quickly from what I can tell.

      Of course, that assumes you can get drivers to stop yeilding to pedestrians that are still so far from the road that they could trip and fall with both arms stretched above their head and still not touch the road with their fingertips.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:Send them into traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frogger is not a city planning tool. Sim City on the other hand...

    3. Re:Send them into traffic by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      Heh I play dwarf fortress mostly, Clearly the way forward involves a lever and a pressure plate at each "crosswalk", and by "crosswalk", of course, I mean "retractable drawbridge over a spike pit". Pedestrian stops and pulls the lever first, no retraction.... step on pressure plate first and the bridge retracts.

      Will likely need some redesign of the sewer system to help actuate the mechanism properly..... but its totally worth it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    4. Re:Send them into traffic by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      ... seriously, sent the texting/chatting group into a lane that walks them right into traffic. That way, you address China's population problem, and you remove lots of idiots from the genepool (hopefully), or at least take out some of those who endanger the rest of us (I can only imagine how those types drive...). The one's who don't walk into traffic survive their Darwinism test.

      If you look at the picture closely you will notice that they did make the sidewalk lane closer to traffic the one for the unobservant cell phone users. I do not think that was a mistake.

    5. Re:Send them into traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh I play dwarf fortress mostly, Clearly the way forward involves a lever and a pressure plate at each "crosswalk", and by "crosswalk", of course, I mean "retractable drawbridge over a spike pit". Pedestrian stops and pulls the lever first, no retraction.... step on pressure plate first and the bridge retracts.

      Will likely need some redesign of the sewer system to help actuate the mechanism properly..... but its totally worth it.

      I love you Urist McUrbanplanner.

  9. How about a smartphone car lane by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    let all the texting/tweeting drivers go into a special lane just for them.

    Build concrete dividers between that and regular lanes. With titanium reinforcements.

  10. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it wasn't the city, it was the property manager.

  11. Why stop there? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    We should also have a lane for those damned elderly and children. They can't walk for shit, either.

    1. Re:Why stop there? by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      A special lane on rail trails would be nice for rollerbladers, bordered with razor wire.

    2. Re:Why stop there? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      No, but both groups can walk and shit at the same time.

  12. I hope.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the cellphones lane ends with a hole in the ground. So that all those idiots who are too busy looking down at their phone to look forward, fall in it and die.

    1. Re:I hope.. by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      the cellphones lane ends with a hole in the ground. So that all those idiots who are too busy looking down at their phone to look forward, fall in it and die.

      Ummm, they're looking down and will see the hole. I think a nice beam about nose high so it hits them in the head might be more effective at getting their heads up and some poetic justice.

    2. Re:I hope.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm working on an app that uses the various sensors on a smart phone to alert the user to potential hazards.

    3. Re:I hope.. by MaryAnnEvans · · Score: 0

      Ummm, they're looking down and will see the hole.

      You overestimate them.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  13. looking down by swell · · Score: 1

    So instead of looking down at their devices, they are looking down at the signs on the sidewalk; and taking photos of them. A questionable improvement.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  14. Video of new lane in action by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Here's a video of someone using the new texting lane

  15. WTF is wrong with people? by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    I'm almost 40, so maybe that explains it, but WTF is with people who cannot put their devices down and just pay attention to what's going on around them?

    What exactly so compelling that you can't take ten or fifteen minutes away from it to walk somewhere?

  16. Waste of time by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

    I haven't read all of the posts since the original story hit the front page, so I may be touching on something that's already been discussed, but ...

    I don't understand how this is different from people just being unaware of their surroundings. I have been to many places in the last 20 years where people will just stop right in the middle of the sidewalk/thoroughfare/pathway to have a conversation or family dispute. The concept of stepping to the side out of the way so that the other 1000 people who aren't having a family issue doesn't seem to occur to them. Cell phones? Just the latest distraction. Oblivious people are forever.

    1. Re:Waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      japanese do this a lot and it drives me nuts, they are some of the least spacially aware people i've ever encountered. every day in the train stations during rush hour there are those walking along in the mass of people and just STOP, or slow way the fuck down to do who knows what, or stand right in front of a ticket gate so that no one can go through it. these people arent trying to be assholes, they just seem to genuinely not understand that they are being bothersome as fuck to hundreds of people around them

  17. They should install piers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is a reference to the woman in Austrailia who was so entranced talking on a cell phone she walked off the end of a pier into the ocean. She was rescued, still holding her phone. No idea if the was waterproof.

    BTW, about 13 years ago I was almost ran over by a Yahoo on a cell phone when I was crossing the street in broad daylight. By almost I mean I back pedaled my last step; if I had gone forward I would have been meat.