Peter Kuran:Visual Effects Artist and Atomic Bomb Archivist
Lasrick links to this interview with Peter Kuran, an animator of the original Star Wars and legendary visual effects artist, writing If you saw the recent remake of Godzilla, you saw stock footage from Atom Central, known on YouTube as 'the atomic bomb channel.' Atom Central is the brainchild of Kuran, who among his many talents is an expert on archival films of the atmospheric testing era of 1945 to 1963. Combining his film restoration and photography expertise with his interest in nuclear history, he has also produced and directed five documentaries. He is currently working with Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos National Laboratories to preserve and catalog images from the bomb-testing era, and to produce a technical handbook that will help people understand these images and the techniques used to create them.
I didn't know the U.S. exploded bombs in space, why?
I've recently went through quite a bit of footage of nuclear bomb tests. This started due to working on a slideshow regarding the bombing of Hiroshima, for YouTube which is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... It's set to the song/poem "I Come And Stand At Every Door", which is about Hiroshima and the larger picture of nuclear war. If you're into poetry or folk music, or just want to see before & after pictures of a bomb blast, you can click.
What a lovely way to get past the filters and spam porno!
There seems to be a plethora (a bundle? a faggot?) of similar urls available: https://www.google.com/search?q="inurl:redirect.aspx"
What a glorious day!
Sometimes I forget how Americans can create a conspiracy theory about everything, anything and nothing.
From the site: "Proofs that Hiroshima & Nagasaki were not A-Bombed" ...
If only you have told me this in the middle of the cold war, when the whole world was on the brink of total annihilation. HOW HAPPY WOULD I HAVE BEEN. This would have been the number one news everywhere!
Also I like how Soviets and the Mao's China played along with this conspiracy! They even developed their own fake bombs, and kind of fake exploded them in the atmosphere (with radioactive fallout) and in the ground (with seismic events).
You remember how good relations we had then? ...
That some weekend we went together fishing some pigs from some bay, I think?
I guess it takes 30 years to forget, and 60 years to turn it upside down.
Also, it seems that you cannot cure the stupid.
There are some half-funny, half-sad, entirely stupid physics arguments on there. They try to reconcile observed effects of radioactivity, nuclear power, and relativity with their unphysical ideas. Sometimes they get very close to being unable to avoid admitting that nuclear weapons exist, but someone is always quick to point out that Einstein was a dirty Jew -- situation averted!
Mushroom cloud, that is
*ducks*
WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
I love it! "Faggot" shall be my collective noun for more than one pr0n website/URL's/spam from now on!
"I visited a Faggot of pr0n sites" or "I deleted a Faggot of pr0n spam in my inbox"!
-- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
Actually, it's rather simple game theory that the USSR would counter with similar psyops.....what would they have to lose? Nothing. Actually adopting the same lies and spitting them back in the face of an opponent would cost them considerably less and provide more benefit. Lies cost substantially less risk in a system where you can brutally suppress your population and restrict freedom of speech.
cool strawman, bro
what's even funnier are the photos that supposedly stand as evidence --- for instance of the shadow images of leafs burned into wood and metal, but yet the fragile leaf remains completely intact. Moreover, the outlines of the leafs presented as that which cast the shadows do not match the supposed outline! Another good one is how the shadow of that valve wheel has its pattern "burned" in reverse! OOPS!
and the propaganda center named "lookout mountain studios", visit nukelies.org
We need to make new footage.
For 8K high FPS glorious nuclear fireballs I'm willing to accept a few percentage increase in cancer risk.
I'm still impressed by the extremely fast photos taken of early nuclear tests - so fast that they show the guy wires on the test towers being vaporized. I think it's way cool that we had the technology to take those photos way back in the 1940s.
Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
Because if Mr. Kuran's bare feet touch the floor, he has been defiled and must be buried out of respect immediately. Major drag.
There's a whole field of opportunity for this guy: restoration of footage from Nagasaki and or Hiroshima years and years since.
Destruction, deformities, and a host of other de-ities.
I've been studying the history of rocketry and nuclear science for years and never did I come across this YouTube channel before, thank you! The Starfish Prime video is particularly amazing, but then they all are.
Yes, it is an amazing piece of con-artistry. Sounds like a prime area of research for a special effects artist!
There were many contemplated uses for nukes in space ranging from anti-ICBM use (destroy/disable inbound missiles) to peaceful uses on the moon (for things like mining and construction). Remember: this was the era of both "Our Friend the Atom" and "Dr Strangelove" with both a public and policy makers having VERY schizophrenic set of views of high energy physics and the applications therefof. The first question that must be asked for ANY of these imagined uses is "does this even work in space?" and the second is "can we make one that works there?" shortly followed by the obvious "WOW, that worked! - what sort of data did we get?"
Every nuclear-capable nation at the time was testing all sorts of things above and below ground, in space, and underwater - and they were each gathering and keeping as much data as possible. Each of these countries still has that data and uses it to inform any new designs and plans (which can move far further forward without any new testing thanks, in part, to a lot of that old highly-classified data)
The world endured a massive bloodbath WORLD War I, and then an even bigger and bloodier WORLD War II only a few years later. There's no reason a third world war should not have happened a few years later (perhaps in the 60s) and a fourth (in the 80s?) and by now even a fifth. The fact that WWI was so bloody and yet WWII came right along is pretty solid evidence that the bloodiness of WWII would not in itself have deterred a convention WWIII. Nukes changed that. Once the US had nukes, conventional world wars were off the table. Once the Soviets got them and the world was polarized along that east-west nuclear line, the only world war possible was a massive nuclear one - which was very unlikely given that the guys on both sides wanted to live and advance their civilizations. I have never seen nukes in the hands of reasonably responsible leaders as much of a threat; it's only nukes in the hands of either [1] apocalyptic crazy jihadis whose religion teaches them to WANT an apocalypse, or [2] totalitarians who want more and are convinced they themselves have too many people (and have implemented population controls, of which war is a fantastic sort) that I fear.
The "brush wars" of the post-WWII era have been bad, but I fear that a return to a nuclear-free world would be a return to massive bloody world wars of genocide and conquest - and, of course, there would be absolutely no way to guarantee that somebody had not kept a few or re-constituted the ability to make new ones.
You know what I don't get (apart from any, obviously)?
I'm surprised they can't do CGI mushroom clouds that actually look subjectively more like mushroom clouds than real mushroom clouds do.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."