Slashdot Mirror


How To View the Antares Launch

An anonymous reader points out NASA's info page on the Anatares rocket launch happening later today. NASA's Wallops Flight Facility and Virginia's Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport are set to support the launch of Orbital Sciences' Antares rocket at 6:45 p.m. EDT, October 27. The Antares rocket will carry Orbital's Cygnus cargo spacecraft, loaded with some 5,000 pounds of supplies and experiments, to the International Space Station. The launch may be visible, weather permitting, to residents throughout the mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions of the United States. Here's a visibility map of launch. Public viewing of the launch will be available at the NASA Visitor Center at Wallops and at the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge/Assateague Island National Seashore. Here's more information about the Visitors Center, including directions, and information on viewing sites recommended by the Eastern Shore of Virginia Tourism Commission. Live coverage of the mission is scheduled to begin at noon on the Wallops Ustream site."

36 comments

  1. Definitely worth a look. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Informative

    These launches aren't that uncommon, but they're visible from a lot of highly-populated areas, and they're bright enough to see even if you've got a lot of light pollution. If you have a good view of the horizon in the proper direction, check it out.

    1. Re: Definitely worth a look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully Bennett Haselton, the frequent contributor, will give us a posting covering the launch and its implications on ice distribution.

    2. Re:Definitely worth a look. by Jonifico · · Score: 1

      Did you get to see it? It must've been a pretty cool watch.

    3. Re: Definitely worth a look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully Bennett Haselton, the frequent contributor, will give us a posting covering the launch and its implications on ice distribution.

      How many comments does it take before this crosses over into bullying?

    4. Re:Definitely worth a look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's this evening.

    5. Re: Definitely worth a look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, once he gets a job and moves out of his mother's basement this will all end.

      Oh wait. That may never happen.

      How many comments does it take before this crosses over into bullying?

    6. Re: Definitely worth a look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many comments does it take before this crosses over into bullying?

      We should all get line and find out. In the most efficient way possible of course.

  2. In metric? by MPBoulton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...loaded with some 5,000 pounds of supplies and experiments..."

    It feels like an organisation such as NASA, which is hopefully respected for its scientific contributions across the world, could set an example by moving towards the metric system in its press releases. This would emphasise the importance the metric system (and the complete intolerance of imperial measurements) in science and allow the move to the metric system to be driven by the scientists (i.e. those in society that lay people respect as being intelligent).

    If the battle between metric vs imperial is just fought over what people prefer in the present, then nothing will change and a backward and overly complixated system for measuring everything will remain.

    1. Re:In metric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it the smartest people piss and moan the most about the modern need to understand two systems of measurement? These people may know several computer languages, several spoken languages, but zOMG!!!! two systems of measurement = crybaby time.

      "Oh, imperial measurements are SOOO HARD!!!! We should only use one! It is too difficult! We should force everyone to use just one!"

    2. Re:In metric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      5000 US Pounds = 357 UK Stones. That should clear things up.

    3. Re:In metric? by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Haha, you first have to convince NASA there's a problem. Last I heard (as of 2009), NASA is still using imperial units for development of the future replacement for the Space Shuttle.

    4. Re:In metric? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      It feels like an organisation such as NASA, which is hopefully respected for its scientific contributions across the world, could set an example by moving towards the metric system in its press releases.

      If it will make your life easier, I can tell you that NASA is launching 2267.96185 kilograms worth of supplies and experiments to the ISS this evening.

      Cheers, mate!

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    5. Re:In metric? by MildlyTangy · · Score: 1

      If NASA is struggling with the Metric system then there is something very very wrong going on here.

      It should be pretty much a given that rocket science is hard. Metric is not hard. An Engineer should be pretty damn proficient with SI units. So why does an organization like NASA struggle with something so fundamental to Science and Engineering as the Metric and SI system of units?

      Is it because America?
      Is it because laziness?

      Anybody have any answers?

    6. Re:In metric? by sootman · · Score: 1

      My rocket gets 40 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I like it!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    7. Re:In metric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill yourself, fanboy.

    8. Re:In metric? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Or two and a half tons. Or a Tesla Model S.

    9. Re:In metric? by MPBoulton · · Score: 1

      Why is it the smartest people piss and moan the most about the modern need to understand two systems of measurement? These people may know several computer languages, several spoken languages, but zOMG!!!! two systems of measurement = crybaby time.

      "Oh, imperial measurements are SOOO HARD!!!! We should only use one! It is too difficult! We should force everyone to use just one!"

      When one is stupid and frankly irrelevant, it deserves to be made obsolete.

  3. Definitely worth a look by Kludge · · Score: 2

    If you are ever out in Maryland, these launches are worth visiting. Here is a hint: Do not go to Chincoteague Island. It is crowded and it is not all that close. You can get twice as close and less crowded by driving around on some back country roads. Google maps/earth is your friend. From our vantage point we could see the rocket before launch. At launch it was blinding. It lit up the entire landscape and we could feel the thunder thumping our chests. 100% worth it.

  4. Will be watching from Connecticut by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    When I lived in Virginia, I saw two launches from Wallops - one at night, which was spectacular, and one during the day, which I could barely make out but was still fun to try and spot. Viewed them from Arlington and DC respectively. I've since moved to Connecticut, but I'm going to try and spot it tonight.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:Will be watching from Connecticut by tekrat · · Score: 2

      If you're looking south/southwest, it should be no problem. I'll be at Eagle Rock Reservation in NJ, which faces New York City, but I can face south enough to catch a bit of it. The problem is I get out of work at 6:15pm, and can't get to any good vantage spots other than Eagle Rock by 6:45. Hoping for the best....

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    2. Re:Will be watching from Connecticut by alienmole · · Score: 3, Informative

      Looking at the map, it seems like the direction to look from Connecticut will be south/southeast (but mostly south). It first has to rise above the Earth's curvature far enough to be visible from CT, and by that time it's already quite far out to sea to the east. Looks like a similar situation in NJ - it's not going to appear to the southwest.

  5. Antares uses Russian Engines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Antares rocket uses

    the Soviet designed NK-33 rocket engine. If we wish to develop space technologies that are independent from Putin, this is not the way to go.

    1. Re:Antares uses Russian Engines by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      ...and one of them blew up earlier this year. ;-) Which is a way to go, so to speak, but not a very nice one. :)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  6. ISS and Antares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should be getting a two-fer in northern Maryland tonight. The ISS is supposed to be visible just a minute later than the Antares comes into view.

    1. Re:ISS and Antares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Launch postponed until tomorrow 28 Oct due to a tourist boat in the restricted area down range. We did get a good view of the ISS and the new moon though.

  7. Wallops: Second favorite NASA site name... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... after "Jackass Flats".

    I'm bummed that I live too far West to be able to see the launch.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:Wallops: Second favorite NASA site name... by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

      I guess Denver is too far west?

  8. For those who want to learn about the rocket... by sootman · · Score: 1

    ... it spelled "Antares", as in the title, not "Anatares", as in the summary.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  9. Launched due to a boat by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Scrubbed, due to some damfool in a boat downrange. Tomorrow @6:19 Eastern.

    1. Re:Launched due to a boat by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      err...meant to say "Scrubbed due to a boat". Not "launched due to a boat"

  10. Launch aborted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Launch aborted...

  11. Launch scrubbed by kooky45 · · Score: 1

    Launch was scrubbed because a boat had wandered onto the launch range. I wonder why the coastguard wasn't policing the range like they did for shuttle launches? Anyway, launch scheduled for 5.19 PM tomorrow.

    1. Re:Launch scrubbed by Amezick · · Score: 1

      The Coast Guard does patrol. On the other hand, how many boats do you think they have? The safety area is huge compared to a size of a boat.

  12. meh. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Antares will launch less than 20 times in its lifetime. In fact, probably less than another 5. NASA is not likely going to use them to provide goods for the ISS since they are expensive for what they bring.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  13. 6 seconds into launch, boom. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Apparently, it exploded just after launch.
    However, I have a pretty clear line of site to Wallops from my house, 75 miles as the crow flies). At the right moment, I recorded what looked to me just like a rocket ascending. 3 or 4 minutes of it.

    1. Re:6 seconds into launch, boom. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      After further checking of the video, it appears to be - just an airplane.
      Return your seat to the upright position.