Slashdot Mirror


After Silk Road 2.0 Shutdown, Rival Dark Net Markets Grow Quickly

apexcp writes: A week ago, Silk Road 2.0 was theatrically shut down by a global cadre of law enforcement. This week, the dark net is realigning. "In the wake of the latest police action against online bazaars, the anonymous black market known as Evolution is now the biggest Dark Net market of all time. Today, Evolution features 20,221 products for sale, a 28.8 percent increase from just one month ago and an enormous 300 percent increase over the past six months."

86 comments

  1. names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should really start naming the black markets after big companies and celebrities. Then, when the news of a shutdown occurs, people will be confused. "What? They shut down the Microsoft drug marketplace?"

    1. Re:names.. by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      that would be great
      Br "last week the feds shut down obama. obama was found to be selling millions of dollars worth of drugs and fake IDs. america sees this as a win against the terrorists"

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What? They shut down the Microsoft drug marketplace?"

      That already exists. How else do you explain Windows 8?

    3. Re:names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha yes

    4. Re:names.. by peragrin · · Score: 1

      They shut down the Google app market where viruses and Trojans where for sale.
      They shut down the Apple sex mart.

      When you are going to jail anyways what is trademark infringement?

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:names.. by 228e2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks Obama.

      --
      Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
    6. Re:names.. by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      their top level domain is .onion

      theonion.com should sue for defamation :)

    7. Re:names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And risk the wrath of the always-ready IP lawyers of said companies? Not worth it!

    8. Re:names.. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Don't target the marketplaces, target the vendors on the marketplaces.

      And how can the vendors on a marketplace be sure it's not a federal honeypot?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re:names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I mean, I could risk the wrath of DEA, NSA, CIA, FBI and a whole bunch of local and state and federal agencies, but Apples lawyers? No way.

    10. Re:names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd name it Westboro Baptist Church.

    11. Re:names.. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      ;-)===)
      Although MS was only selling downers, not my kind of thing...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    12. Re:names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think the vendors on a marketplace sign up using their real name and address?

      So what if it is a federal honeypot. Long as the vendors have good opsec, their only interaction with the site is via TOR, and encrypted addresses the buyers send them.

      Unless you think that after a couple months, the vendors would be stupid enough to fall for a message like "Hey dude! You're doing lots of business! Want to bulk buy some illegal drugs from me? Let's chat on skype a bit more! Sincerely, Definitely Not An FBI Informant."

    13. Re:names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really isn't a problem for vendors. You get paid in bitcoin and send stuff from wherever. It is more a problem for the buyer. How do they know it isn't a honeypot? After all they want to receive the goods they have paid for at some stage.

    14. Re:names.. by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Actually .onion is just a psuedo-TLD.

    15. Re:names.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a really good idea - just be sure to put very distinct disclaimers on the splash page and in the "terms and conditions" section of the website that it is not affiliated with "Brand Name" company. A Google search won't show that in the results and since dumb America doesn't bother looking beyond headlines....

  2. Hire the Russians hackers to prevent police action by AltGrendel · · Score: 0

    All right, maybe they aren't Russian, I don't know. But why not try to find these uber-coders that you always hear about to do some pen testing of the Tor code? It's in their best interest to make sure Tor is as secure as possible.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  3. Good luck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is like trying to stop people from breathing... The illicit markets will NEVER die.

    Man wants what he cannot have... This will NEVER change.

    Its our Nature. Fighting our own nature... Is costing us more than we care to admit.

    1. Re:Good luck... by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      The FBI/Police/DEA/etc. know that. But they need to put on the occasional show to justify their budgets and keep their jobs.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Good luck... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      So there is no such thing as crime, and all the law enforcement is just a vast job creation exercise?

      Or do you just mean that the particular crimes we're talking about (selling drugs and child abuse images, predominantly) are ones you don't think should be illegal?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Good luck... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      So there is no such thing as crime, and all the law enforcement is just a vast job creation exercise?

      Mostly, yes. If you look at different cities, and even different countries, there are differences in crime rates, and vast differences in numbers of police. But there is little correlation between the two. "More police" does not mean "less crime".

      Or do you just mean that the particular crimes we're talking about (selling drugs and child abuse images, predominantly) are ones you don't think should be illegal?

      Yes. This too.

    4. Re:Good luck... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      By the OP's logic, there shouldn't be any police because nothing should be a crime. People should be free to do whatever they want.

      This of course leads to the wonderful situation where if my neighbor is offering 2 year olds for sex, I can go over and shoot them and not have to worry about any repercussions because neither situation is a crime.

      In reality this has a great benefit because no longer would taxpayers have to pay to keep criminals housed and fed. Once they're dead, they're dead.

      I think it's a win-win situation.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:Good luck... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Who do you think would be dead first? Sociopathic criminals or the nice people who oppose them?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:Good luck... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      This is like trying to stop people from breathing... The illicit markets will NEVER die.

      Man wants what he cannot have... This will NEVER change.

      Its our Nature. Fighting our own nature... Is costing us more than we care to admit.

      More like Man wants what his government has decided he should not have. But you're right, it is costing us a lot.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re:Good luck... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. This is the dour "anti fun" coalition of authoritarians trying to enforce their screwed-up mind-set. While I personally do not use drugs besides sugar, caffeine, alcohol (with the first and the last killing more people than "illegal" drugs), I think that you should get medical-grade recreational drugs of all kinds known to mankind with professional usage instructions and at reasonable prices. Anything else is just utterly uncivilized and evil. If some puritans do not want to have fun, that is fine by me, but imposing that on others is utterly unacceptable.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  4. Cyber War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Cyber Warriors across the world re-allign their cyber guns, pointing them at government.

  5. The dark net by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    I expect some of those 20221 products to be made of dark matter and powered by dark energy. Brought to you by Dark Helmet on a dark horse.

    Also, let's all agree that "Evolution" is an amazingly shitty name for an online black market after "Silk Road", which was pretty inspired.

    We should start a campaign to suggest better names for the next instance after Evolution.

    I suggest:
    The Dark Bazaar

    1. Re:The dark net by Affenkopf · · Score: 1

      The biggest competitor to Evolution is named Agora which is a pretty great name.

    2. Re:The dark net by mlk · · Score: 1

      Eurasian Land Bridge does not roll off the tongue. Maybe Bogie exchange?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:The dark net by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1

      I agree Evolution is a lame choice in names. I was thinking more like Black Hydra.

    4. Re:The dark net by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Dr. NO, is that you?

    5. Re:The dark net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. When the Silk Road evolves, it becomes Poppy Ally. Gotta catch'em all!

    6. Re:The dark net by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The biggest competitor to Evolution is named Agora which is a pretty great name.

      Why don't they just call it "Ayn Rand" or "The Eagle's Lair", that'd show the fucking Untermenschen who's the cool kid on the block.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:The dark net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're crossing your objectivists with your existentialists. Never cross objectivists with existentialists - they could produce offspring with enough unfettered superiority to destroy us all.

    8. Re: The dark net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doctor... is that you?

    9. Re:The dark net by eulernet · · Score: 1

      Why not "Darkwin" ?
      A mix between Darwin and Dark.

    10. Re: The dark net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean like Darkwin Duck?

  6. Evolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Addiction finds a way.

    1. Re:Evolution? by gweihir · · Score: 2

      As it turns out, quite a few of these are not nearly as addictive or destructive as usually claimed. The "war on drugs" is also a "war on truth".

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. No kidding by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In other news, police arrest drug dealer on corner. New drug dealer replaces him that same night.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:No kidding by bunratty · · Score: 2

      Well, all those jail cells aren't just going to fill themselves up, are they?

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  8. Hey, no worries! by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    At some point - probably soon - they'll shut down the last one of these and then there won't be any more. That's how the war on drugs was won!

    1. Re:Hey, no worries! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some point - probably soon - they'll shut down the last one of these and then there won't be any more. That's how the war on drugs was won!

      If you want to truly win the war on drugs, then you need to go after the biggest drug dealers on the planet.

      In case you were wondering, that would be the ones we allow to legally peddle their fucking addictions.

    2. Re:Hey, no worries! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      At some point - probably soon - they'll shut down the last one of these and then there won't be any more. That's how the war on drugs was won!

      If you want to truly win the war on drugs, then you need to go after the biggest drug dealers on the planet.

      In case you were wondering, that would be the ones we allow to legally peddle their fucking addictions.

      Yes, we should criminalise tobacco and alcohol, and hand out free crystal meth to schoolkids at break times.

      That would solve everything.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Hey, no worries! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We already prescribe them kiddie coke(ritalin) and better speed than crystal(dextoamphetamine). Most kids take this for breakfast and lunch.

    4. Re:Hey, no worries! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it would solve everything.

      But then you'd get the whiners that, looking back through the eyes of history, decry your fantastically successful efforts as "genocide" or some bullshit.

      Monday quarterbacks, the lot of them.

    5. Re:Hey, no worries! by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      The only way to truly win the war on drugs is to quit fighting. There's no way to "win" and no reason to continue. Rates of drug usage are as high or higher than they were before the war. You can see in Colorado that marijuana usage didn't increase when it became legal.

      But us not fighting would actually be a win. The free market would make many drugs really cheap (like marijuana) and drive the criminal drug gangs out of business. Remember, Al Capone was a liquor distributor who lived 80 years ago and you know his name. Think about that, and then try to name the head of any current liquor distribution company.

    6. Re:Hey, no worries! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      At some point - probably soon - they'll shut down the last one of these and then there won't be any more. That's how the war on drugs was won!

      If you want to truly win the war on drugs, then you need to go after the biggest drug dealers on the planet.

      In case you were wondering, that would be the ones we allow to legally peddle their fucking addictions.

      Don't forget the CIA and the banks that launder the money for them!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re:Hey, no worries! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      +1 funny.

      Oh, you were serious? My condolences then on your non-functional mind.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Hey, no worries! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      At some point - probably soon - they'll shut down the last one of these and then there won't be any more. That's how the war on drugs was won!

      I know you are being sarcastic, but the number of people on this thread who need a reality check is just amazing.

      Why are there no online drug stores running on regular non-Tor websites, accepting money via PayPal? Because they would get shut down and the operators arrested immediately. In fact there used to be one such site, called the Farmers Market, which pre-dated the use of Tor and Bitcoin. And the owners were indeed found and jailed. Since FM was seized there weren't any more like it.

      Now we come to this. It appears that the police believe they have a repeatable technique for busting black markets using hidden services. Whether they do or whether it's just a bluff, I suppose we shall see - I suspect they have a technique that is powerful but not all powerful. But I don't know and nor does anyone else outside the law enforcement community, so the people running and using sites like Evolution and Agora are taking big risks.

      If the new technique they've developed is powerful enough, it's actually not unimaginable that all such sites would end up being seized.

  9. Re:Hire the Russians hackers to prevent police act by f3rret · · Score: 1

    All right, maybe they aren't Russian, I don't know. But why not try to find these uber-coders that you always hear about to do some pen testing of the Tor code? It's in their best interest to make sure Tor is as secure as possible.

    Fairly certain the russian and the international hacker community in general is already doing this.

    Of course a true pro would not be using a publicly accessible darknet, they'd run their own.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  10. Hail Hydra! by VAXcat · · Score: 2

    Cut off a head, and two shall take its place! Hail Hydra!

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    1. Re:Hail Hydra! by Scottingham · · Score: 1

      Glad I'm not the only one who thought that. Then again, I just saw Captain America for the first time like 3 days ago.

    2. Re:Hail Hydra! by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      So I'm guessing you didn't RTFA where they talk about the Hydra? I know, I know, I must be new here.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Hail Hydra! by antdude · · Score: 1

      Hail to the hypnotoad.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  11. Re:Hire the Russians hackers to prevent police act by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All right, maybe they aren't Russian, I don't know. But why not try to find these uber-coders that you always hear about to do some pen testing of the Tor code? It's in their best interest to make sure Tor is as secure as possible.

    What are you talking about? The only thing Tor does is add layers of indirection between the client and host, the data still needs to eventually be able to find a viable route between A and B. When a large percentage of connections using the TOR protocol end up at the same hand full of places, which is something that you can determine when you have access to a Tier 1 service providers records btw, then it helps narrow down the number of suspects you need to investigate. The only way to remain secure in that world is to remain small.

  12. How is it "dark"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously how is it "Dark net" if it is known enough to make it to the Slashdot rss feed?

  13. Too much publicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drugs are an important part of society. Some may not like it, but a place such as the DNM's are a better, safer way for people to score their fix. I really wish that there would be less media attention, and that the united states would back the hell off of the drug trade. I don't know whats worse, the people sitting at home getting high, or the militarized police presence that is terrorizing their own people.

  14. News=Where to find drugs by Jharish · · Score: 1

    I really enjoy the fact that the 'news' tells us where to go to buy our drugs now that Silk Road is down again. And reading the comments told me which top competitors to look for as well. Thanks 'the news'. And thanks Slashdot. Thanks to you I no longer have to face the world sober.

    1. Re:News=Where to find drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't use drugs before, would you use them now that you know where to find them? Arguably, you probably did know where to find them before, but still you didn't use them either. How should "these news" change it in any way?

    2. Re:News=Where to find drugs by operator_error · · Score: 1

      Let's say you really wanted to buy drugs on-line because you thought it was a good idea for whatever reason. Do you trust your own ability not to be traced (which is paramount), in addition to the quality of encryption and other feats provided by your dealer. That's a real risk. Plus, how many of these sites are honeypots, (and when/if they get busted, and their encryption isn't up to snuff they might as well be honeypots for purposes of this discussion)? Buyer beware.

      Evolution in this case means not only good customer service, but quality encryption as well. Beware of dependencies, no pun intended.

    3. Re:News=Where to find drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's say you really wanted to buy drugs on-line because you thought it was a good idea for whatever reason. Do you trust your own ability not to be traced (which is paramount), in addition to the quality of encryption and other feats provided by your dealer.

      No, but I trust my government not to waste time chasing down recreational drug users. The dealer is at risk, not me. Of course, I don't live in the USA. Suprisingly this is true of most of the people on the internet.

  15. Legalize the drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The huge "black market" for these kinds of drugs is thriving because people must invest big monies for drugs that are basically trash that is sold for 300x the real value.

    Legalize the drugs. Let any local pharmacy/drug store sell these drugs to anyone who really wants to consume them, and the price will drop quickly, killing the black market.

    1. Re:Legalize the drugs by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Also killing side-effects from unsafe manufacturing, deaths from too strong stuff, etc. Most recreational drugs can be used in an entirety safe manner and for the rest, medical grade still is a lot better than what you can get on the streets. Illegality does not stop anybody. The prohibitionists are insane and evil.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  16. Re: Hire the Russians hackers to prevent police ac by AcerbusNoir · · Score: 1

    Wrong. Tor helps to reduce the risks of both simple and sophisticated traffic analysis by distributing your transactions over several places on the Internet, so no single point can link you to your destination. https://www.torproject.org/about/overview

  17. Whack a mole; it's govt. policy! by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As far as I'm concerned, the only really legitimate reason for govt. to have gone after the original Silk Road operator was the allegation that the guy placed a hit on someone else. The act of hiring someone to murder another person for you is pretty clearly illegal and the law should pursue that.

    The act of running an anonymous marketplace website seems to me like it should fall under "common carrier" status. Of course, the govt. hasn't been interested in looking at things that way ever since the BBS era in the 1980's.

    The fact remains though.... the U.S. post office surely helped facilitate the actual delivery of many of those illegal orders placed on Silk Road, yet we never talk about arresting the mailmen who delivered the packages. We never talk about raids on the post offices to search through boxes held there either.

    When criminals conduct illegal business via phone calls, nobody ever blames the telco for selling them the circuit that allowed it to happen either.

    If you want to argue that Silk Road type websites are illustrating collusion with the criminals by offering categories such as "illegal drugs" to post ads in? You might have a valid point there ... But it seems to me that's little more than a detail that such site operators could get around by simply making broad, more general categories that are clearly usable for LEGAL transactions as well as anything illegal in some countries.

    So far, I haven't really heard any evidence that Silk Road 2's operator was directly INVOLVED in any criminal activity. (No requests to murder someone else, no selling or buying of illegal substances himself, etc.)

    1. Re:Whack a mole; it's govt. policy! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well the government never let intellectual consistency get in the way of doing what they want to do.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:Whack a mole; it's govt. policy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem is the govt does not *advertise* that it specifically delivers drugs. all it does is delivers parcels.

      if these markets were truly agnostic platforms, with no forums where the admins talk drugs (conspiracy), with no predefined product (drug, card, gun) categories, where no forum/dispute/transaction moderation occurs.... all completely user driven... THEN the operator would be immune.

      but operators are vain, and don't know how to write an agnostic user defined site.
      oh well, welcome to jail.

    3. Re:Whack a mole; it's govt. policy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, the hit alogations evaporated quickly as evidence was gathered. Indeed, the charges related to these alogations have been dropped.

    4. Re:Whack a mole; it's govt. policy! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      The fact remains though.... the U.S. post office surely helped facilitate the actual delivery of many of those illegal orders placed on Silk Road, yet we never talk about arresting the mailmen who delivered the packages. We never talk about raids on the post offices to search through boxes held there either.

      Um, there might be arguments for what the Silk Road and similar sites have been doing, but this isn't it.

      The Post Office in any country is not explicitly set up to facilitate illegal activity. You don't read about postmen getting arrested for delivering packages because they are doing so blindly, they didn't know they were delivering drugs. And you don't hear about raids on post offices because .... duh .... the postal system cooperates with law enforcement when they get a warrant to search mail, along with other ways too.

      The charges against Ulbricht and Benthall are "engaging in a conspiracy to sell narcotics". The post office is clearly not doing that, so, no crime.

      it seems to me that's little more than a detail that such site operators could get around by simply making broad, more general categories that are clearly usable for LEGAL transactions as well as anything illegal in some countries.

      Your understanding of the law is incredibly bad. In law, intent matters a lot. Silk Road 1.0 did in fact have categories for things like books. However its primary purpose was clearly the selling of drugs, as evidenced by the fact that they didn't remove drug listings, had dedicated categories for them, helped mediate disputes for them, charged money on them, and tried to hide themselves because they knew what they were doing was illegal.

      If Silk Road had been primarily a book store, and occasional ads for drugs were quickly erased, then there would have been no problem .... but equally no point, because existing sites like Amazon already do a good job of that.

  18. Re: Hire the Russians hackers to prevent police ac by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

    so no single point can link you to your destination

    In this case there are (potentially) many points. No one node can connect the source and destination of a given connection, but if the attacker monitors or controls enough of the internal routing nodes then it's not that difficult to analyse the timing and build up a statistical model linking the endpoints over time. For that matter, a busy .onion site would tend to stand out no matter how obfuscated the routing, simply because of the increased traffic.

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  19. Prohibition does not work! by s.petry · · Score: 1

    I can't determine if your post is sarcasm or not, but I'm pretty sure it's sarcasm. This post is really for the next guy assuming sarcasm was correct.

    How many times do people have to read history to determine that prohibition does not work? The "War on Drugs" is a failure, alcohol prohibition was a failure, and Opium prohibition was another failure. How can anyone in good faith know history and claim that the answer is punishing consumers and/or bystanders? Simple, it can't be done in good faith because they are basing their claim on a lie.

    Making a site like Silk Road illegal does nothing to address the problem. People may as well try to make back alleys illegal, whispering illegal, and sound proof board rooms illegal.

    Bad guys exist because there is a segment of society who's only opportunity for advancement is through illegal activities, and another segment who's only method of survival is illegal activities.

    Smart cops use alleys to determine what's going on, they don't fight to fill them with concrete or arrest anyone driving through the alley. When the not so smart cops find an alley and start arresting everyone inside, the bad guys just move.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  20. when the red river flows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...take the Silk Road?

  21. Black list for authorities? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    There was a recent post asking how authorities might have breached the Tor network.

    A related question to ask might be "what can we do to increase our network privacy/security"?

    I've often wondered if a "government authority" blacklist would be worthwhile. For example, the City Police near where you live probably surf from a fixed IP address at that location. We could maintain a list of such addresses and allow websites to subscribe to the list.

    If an address geolocates to within 50 miles of Washington DC (or Langley, VA; or Bluffdale, UT) it's probably not someone you want looking at your site.

    Anyone with the slightest idea of how the internet works will realize that this scheme will be trivial to get around using any number of techniques, but the purpose isn't to make access *impossible*, it's to make access *harder*. It starts an arms race between government agencies and an army of determined hackers.

    Suppose you're a government agent. You can't send a link over E-mail to your boss at the office because when he opens it the site will show different results. You have to do screenshots or make web page copies - it's much more work (and a more complicated evidence chain).

    Suppose you're a government IT guy. You have to implement VPN connections to remote computers so that your agents can surf the net properly, and this is a ton more work for you to do, and it's insecure and might open up your internal network to hackers.

    It starts a competition for resources. In addition to law enforcement, the government entities also have to spend time, effort, and money to get around the additional hurdle. If it costs us little to implement, and costs them a lot to get around, then it's effort well spent. And there's a multiplication factor: each and every government agency has to implement a solution to our one system.

    In the manner of spam blacklists, we could allow people to nominate specific IP addresses as being "city hall in Tallahassee" with some confirmation protocols to ensure accuracy and that the list doesn't get spammed.

    You could have your website either block the listed IP addresses, or show different content.

    We could make it *much* harder for authorities to gather website evidence.

    1. Re:Black list for authorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A big part of the problem with a strategy like this is the goal of Tor to hide the source of content. Surely someone running a tor node could make that decision for their direct connections, but with a site there could be multiple nodes down-line hiding the final destination of content.

    2. Re:Black list for authorities? by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      "Suppose you're a government IT guy. You have to implement VPN connections" It's called Tor dummy. It gives anonomity to the average Joe and the federal agents investigating hem. " You can't send a link over E-mail to your boss at the office because when he opens " Implement a proxy that can replay a page load and tag and embeds a unique page load ID as a comment at the start of the HTML file. Pair with a browser extension that can read this PLID and email the PLID to your boss They probably already have something like this for some extobetent price that gov types are willing to buy because, hey it's not really thier money they are spending. "It starts a competition for resources" Generally the proven methods are good crypto and decentralized systems. The effort to blacklist Government IP's is about proportional to the effort of Gov agents to subert it, and they have a lot more resources than can bring to bear. The effort is better spend elsewhere.

  22. Re:Hire the Russians hackers to prevent police act by gweihir · · Score: 1

    That is not how hidden services work. They do not "exit" the TOR net at all and are hence indistinguishable from relays.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  23. The dark net by nbauman · · Score: 1

    We should start a campaign to suggest better names for the next instance after Evolution.

    Intelligent Design?

  24. Re:Hire the Russians hackers to prevent police act by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

    What if I told you that they did and Silk Road was the honey pot?

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. circular links by swell · · Score: 1

    The link is to dailydot.com. Every link at dailydot is to another dailydot page. Yes, this often happens at slashdot, but it is a sign of, um, what should I call it? When you only link to your own site, you may not be serving the public as well as you could.

    I'd like to see links to insightful pages outside the original site. That is increasingly harder to find. This 'Evolution' site is said to be the 'biggest Dark Net market of all time' and yet there is no link to it or to any site that has something useful to say about it. This /. story seems to be a useless tease.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  27. Agora Marketplace Offers More Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agora made the Silk Road look like a joke. The only reason the governments went after SR is because it was so vulnerable and they could make an example of SR in the media. Well I haven't seen any security, stability, or privacy issues with Agora. Currently by invite link only though due to recent events. Current invite link only accessible via Tor browser.

    http://agorahooawayyfoe.onion/register/KgLio7jsR8

  28. re: understanding of the law by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Umm... no. I think I understand the law pretty well. And just like I said, the mistake these guys made really just lies in the details. They could run the exact SAME software, the exact SAME way (requiring a Tor session to establish a connection to it), and get around the accusations of engaging in a conspiracy to sell narcotics by simply eliminating the names of categories of sales that are deemed illegal.

    You can't prove that the site operator opted to run an anonymous site purely or primarily to hide the fact that it was for illegal activities. That's nothing more than a theory or a guess. I'd say that many people interested in projects like Tor just believe in the idea that you have the right to conduct a financial transaction without being traced. (A pure cash transaction in the physical world is pretty much just that.) Without these options, we've reached a point where it's nearly IMPOSSIBLE to buy anything over the Internet without the transaction getting logged (or even analyzed for some sort of marketing or statistical purposes). About the closest thing to it is using a site like Craigslist to meet someone in person and pay cash to do the transaction -- but then we're back to using traditional methods vs. online payment and some sort of mail delivery of the product.

  29. Re: Hire the Russians hackers to prevent police ac by JockKnox · · Score: 1

    Hi dude I'm soz but I'm highly milatant i do not giv 1 fuk who or what knows where i have been. Yes I do drugs, yes I have bought class a drugs online. My name and addresses are easyly.findable wit my ip address but do i give a fuck? NO. Its my body,my life, my choice fuck u and every LIE u have ever told.