Slashdot Mirror


Interviews: Ask the Hampton Creek Team About the Science and Future of Food

samzenpus writes Hampton Creek is a food technology company that makes food healthier by utilizing a specially made egg substitute in food products. The company was selected by Bill Gates to be featured on his website in a story called, The Future of Food, and has raised $30 million in funding. Hampton Creek's latest product is called, Just Cookies, which is an eggless chocolate chip cookie dough, but it is their eggless mayo that has been in the news lately. Unilever, which manufactures Hellmann's and Best Foods mayonnaise, is suing Hampton Creek claiming that the name Just Mayo is misleading to consumers. Named one of Entrepreneur Magazine's 100 Brilliant Companies and one of CNBC's Top 50 Disruptors, Hampton Creek has picked up some impressive talent including the former lead data scientist at Google Maps, Dan Zigmond. With Thanksgiving just around the corner, Dan and the Hampton Creek team have agreed to answer any questions you may have. As usual, ask as many as you'd like, but please, one per post.

145 comments

  1. What is it? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    So, what is your egg substitute made from, and how have you demonstrated it is safe for human consumption?

    If the answer is "we can't tell you", or "we assume it is safe" then I can tell you many people won't go anywhere near it.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pea protein.

    2. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the answer is "we can't tell you", or "we assume it is safe" then I can tell you many people won't go anywhere near it.
       
      Really? Have your average consumer read the ingredients from any number of other products in their grocery basket and ask them where they come from, what reason they're in their food and what health concerns should be raised by consuming it.

    3. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It really is just a matter of time until we are relying on insects for protein. The alternative is to stop fucking and that one ain't gonna fly.

    4. Re:What is it? by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      So, what is your egg substitute made from, and how have you demonstrated it is safe for human consumption?

      Too lazy to Google it yourself?

      "The plant that replaces the egg in Just Mayo is a specific variety of the Canadian yellow pea (a type of split pea)."

    5. Re:What is it? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I was wondering the same thing.

      And by the way..what's wrong with eating an EGG?

      Simple, natural food. I'd rather have that than a bunch of man- made chemicals. I'm currently trying to get rid of most of the chemicals man puts into things these days....and it ain't easy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what is your egg substitute made from, and how have you demonstrated it is safe for human consumption?

      Seriously dude? Do you work for Hellmann's?

      The ingredients are listed on their website: http://www.hamptoncreek.com/ju...

      Ingredients: Non-GMO Expeller Pressed Canola Oil, Filtered Water, Lemon Juice, White Vinegar, 2% or less of the following: Organic Sugar, Salt, Pea Protein, Spices, Modified Food Starch, Beta-Carotene.

      These are ordinary food ingredients.

      By comparison, Hellmann's ingredients are ( http://www.hellmanns.com/produ... ):

      SOYBEAN OIL, WATER, WHOLE EGGS AND EGG YOLKS, VINEGAR, SALT, SUGAR, LEMON JUICE, CALCIUM DISODIUM EDTA (USED TO PROTECT QUALITY), NATURAL FLAVORS. GLUTEN-FREE.

    7. Re:What is it? by Punko · · Score: 1

      Well, my son has a rather nasty allergy to egg protein (yolk and white), so cookie dough that doesn't include eggs is one of those bonus things. Sadly, most things that act as a 1:1 substitute with eggs fail in some way, as there is no artificial egg that covers all the things that eggs are good for. While I agree that getting "unnatural" chemicals out of foods is generally a good thing, I am also willing to acknowledge that manufactured foods change as our available raw ingredients change.

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    8. Re:What is it? by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Eggs require chickens which requires feeding chickens, which is fine if you're raising the chickens yourself, but when you have a world with billions of people, not everyone can raise their own chickens, so either you stop eating chickens, or you get someone else to raise them for you. *takes breath* All that chicken requires a lot of feed, and a lot of feed takes more airable land away from producing the crap you do want, like human consumable veg and the such. Airable land is scarce and getting more so. So either you stop eating all together (a proud though darwinian outcome), you find more efficient human consumtion methods (like the one listed in said article), you purge humanity thorugh bloody force, or you purge humanity through artificial means of blocking reproduction. Pick your poison.

      --
      Bye!
    9. Re:What is it? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      The government assures you it is safe to consume.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    10. Re:What is it? by kesuki · · Score: 2

      chickens are omnivores. they eat everything, grass, bugs, other chickens if they get bloodlust... they will even eat dirt and fecal material... my uncle raises his own chickens and feeds them with some feed and garden greens...

      there is also a neat organic chicken method where they are in a moveable, large area cage, which forces them to eat grass and dirt, which they usually avoid as they seek bugs as primary food... it takes grass 7 days to recover from this organic feeding method so you don't need a huge area to do it in. the reason old farms had no problem with bugs was by making the chickens free range in farmland and they would seek shelter (hen house) and without fences you just need a dog or two to keep the chickens on your land... true factory farms produce eggs faster but it is more resource heavy than local farming practices. which we know are sustainable because we have old villages where at one point people were subsistence farming.

      http://www.motherearthnews.com/homesteading-and-livestock/raising-free-range-chickens-zmaz84jazloeck.aspx

      they claim you don't need dogs, but dogs also deter chicken raiding foxes or wolves.

    11. Re:What is it? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      It always bugs me when companies write "natural flavours". Not only could it be anything, it doesn't tell me if it comes from an animal, plant or mineral. I'm guessing a lot of vegetarians, vegans and people with various forms of food allergies read "natural flavours" (without any specifics about the source of said flavour) and the product goes back on the shelf.

      There's warnings about peanuts, soy, sesame seeds and even testing and seals of approval by a handful of religions. If you believe in a magical being in the sky you're covered, but if you make ethical choices or have some types of food allergies you don't exist? What kind of bullshit is this? Why can't there be a push to acknowledge vegetarians and vegans?

    12. Re:What is it? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I don't want to consume the government!

    13. Re:What is it? by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      chickens are pretty good at producing fertilizer

    14. Re:What is it? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Everybody wants smaller gov't, but nobody is willing to actually do it.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    15. Re:What is it? by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Eggs are about as natural as the chickens they pump with antibiotics. So, no.

      People should eat what they want to eat and will, but it helps that if you decide to eat eggs you understand what's going into the chickens you're getting them from.

    16. Re:What is it? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing.

      And by the way..what's wrong with eating an EGG?

      Simple, natural food. I'd rather have that than a bunch of man- made chemicals. I'm currently trying to get rid of most of the chemicals man puts into things these days....and it ain't easy.

      Hmm, so to get an egg you need many gross things (chickens, hormones for the chickens, vaccines for the chickens, food for the chickens, fertilizer for the food for the chickens, etc etc etc) and yet to get peas you need a seed, sunlight, and water. Yep, let's go with eggs as being more natural!

      But seriously, eggs arent that bad for you, but they are incredibly energy intensive compared to just eating plants. Something like 20x more energy goes into an egg than goes into the peas that make up this product, to get the same result. Thats the big innovation, you can start to get foods on the shelf that really are far more sustainable (even if they arent cheaper yet) and leave more energy on the planet for something else to use, like perhaps more delicious beef.

    17. Re:What is it? by blue9steel · · Score: 2

      Hmm, so to get an egg you need many gross things (chickens, hormones for the chickens, vaccines for the chickens, food for the chickens, fertilizer for the food for the chickens, etc etc etc) and yet to get peas you need a seed, sunlight, and water. Yep, let's go with eggs as being more natural!

      Wait, you're comparing factory raised chickens with organic peas? Chickens only require two things food (pasture or feed) and water. All the other stuff is just to raise productivity. Commercial Ag peas use things like fertilizer, pesticides, etc. not just "seed, sunlight, and water".

    18. Re:What is it? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Actually many are willing to reduce the size of government, it's just that we can't all agree on what parts are useful and what parts are waste.

    19. Re:What is it? by gunnnnslinger · · Score: 1

      Or just eat fucking plants? There's plenty of protein in the plant world. You fucking meat eaters are ruining the fucking planet, and torturing billions of creatures annually because you like the taste.

    20. Re:What is it? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Hmm, so to get an egg you need many gross things (chickens, hormones for the chickens, vaccines for the chickens, food for the chickens, fertilizer for the food for the chickens, etc etc etc) and yet to get peas you need a seed, sunlight, and water. Yep, let's go with eggs as being more natural!

      Wait, you're comparing factory raised chickens with organic peas? Chickens only require two things food (pasture or feed) and water. All the other stuff is just to raise productivity. Commercial Ag peas use things like fertilizer, pesticides, etc. not just "seed, sunlight, and water".

      Except, for the same energy input (cost) you can get the most pristine organic peas, vs what it would take to get a chicken to lay an egg. If you are trying to reduce the unknowns/unnecessaries from your food chain, it's a no-brainer.

    21. Re:What is it? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Um... no. There is not plenty of protein in the plant world. Contrary to popular Vegan opinion, we are not bovines. We are omnivores. We are adapted to eat whatever we can get our hands on with the notable exception of green plant matter. THAT is something we don't digest well (or at all).

      Eating an animal living off of marginal grasslands is a much more carbon friendly option for humans than trying to grow anything on such land.

      Feeding an overpopulated planet won't be done in a "nice" way regardless of what kind of soylent you try to force on people. There's just too many of us.

      You are not a cow regardless of how badly you want to be one.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    22. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't there be a push to acknowledge vegetarians and vegans?

      I'd rather just roll back all the religious crap on food than add to it.

    23. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "carbon friendly" - LOL. What does that mean, exactly?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO08Hhjes_0

      There is no such thing as catastrophic man-made global warming.

      We are not omnivores. Why aren't you sucking milk from a cow's udders, or a pig's udders, or an elephant's udders? You have no idea why you AREN'T vegan, that's the most pathetic thing about it all. You aren't a vegan, because most other people aren't too. You never thought it through.

      And yes, you simply don't CARE about the unending suffering of billions of animals. Care to explain why?

    24. Re:What is it? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      You are not a cow regardless of how badly you want to be one.

      How can you be sure? Have you seen gunnnnslinger?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    25. Re:What is it? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Actually, 80% of farm land goes to animals and raising feed for animals. This also contributes 18% of greenhouse gas emissions.
      If we stopped eating meat, there would be surplus food for everyone, we could take a lot of land out of production and we would be half-way to reducing the 2050 target for greenhouse emissions.

      Interesting article:
      Climatic Change (2009) 95:83–102 DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6
      Climate benefits of changing diet
      Elke Stehfest Lex Bouwman Detlef P. van Vuuren
      Michel G. J. den Elzen Bas Eickhout Pavel Kabat

      Abstract: Climate change mitigation policies tend to focus on the energy sector, while the livestock sector receives surprisingly little attention, despite the fact that it ac- counts for 18% of the greenhouse gas emissions and for 80% of total anthropogenic land use. From a dietary perspective, new insights in the adverse health effects of beef and pork have lead to a revision of meat consumption recommendations. Here, we explored the potential impact of dietary changes on achieving ambitious climate stabilization levels. By using an integrated assessment model, we found a global food transition to less meat, or even a complete switch to plant-based protein food to have a dramatic effect on land use. Up to 2,700 Mha of pasture and 100 Mha of cropland could be abandoned, resulting in a large carbon uptake from regrowing vegetation. Additionally, methane and nitrous oxide emission would be reduced substantially. A global transition to a low meat-diet as recommended for health reasons would reduce the mitigation costs to achieve a 450 ppm CO2-eq. stabilisation target by about 50% in 2050 compared to the reference case. Dietary changes could therefore not only create substantial benefits for human health and global land use, but can also play an important role in future climate change mitigation policies.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    26. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what is your egg substitute made from, and how have you demonstrated it is safe for human consumption?

      If the answer is "we can't tell you", or "we assume it is safe" then I can tell you many people won't go anywhere near it.

      Actually most people will go near it, whether they want to or not. They can call it "substantially equivalent" and have droves of younger slashdotters saying we are luddites if we dont agree that:

      "cross pollinating plants" == "injecting fish dna into corn"

    27. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegans have much lower sperm counts than those who eat meat.

    28. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who doesn't know the difference between their ass and a hole in the ground. It's scary how clueless and dangerous people like you are.

    29. Re: What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, why not rename it, "Just Pea?"

    30. Re:What is it? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Except, for the same energy input (cost) you can get the most pristine organic peas, vs what it would take to get a chicken to lay an egg.

      Fungus is even cheaper, why waste money on fancy schmancy peas?

    31. Re: What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) Procreation only requires 1 (sperm cell).
      B) If vegans reproduce less often then they are acting more responsibly.

    32. Re:What is it? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about what we evolved to eat. But I don't agree with you about cows being environmentally friendly. Everywhere in the world they mostly graze land which used to be forest. Here in the USA that is definitely true. And I have a great example, in fact. I live in Kelseyville, which is in Lake County. It's named for a guy who enslaved, raped, and murdered the locals — it's a bit living in Hitlerville or Santa Torquemada. This town has a whole bunch of walnut trees, and indeed it used to be one of the biggest walnut producers in California. The US government paid people to plant these trees, and so they did. But first, they cut down whichever oaks hadn't already been cut down to make room for cattle ranching. Part of the idea, of course, was to eliminate the natives' food source. They ate acorns. You can live on those, but you can't live on walnuts alone.

      So yeah, in places which naturally tend to pasture, grazing cattle is perfectly environmentally friendly. Problem is, those places are in the minority. Most places tend towards forest, if you give them enough time. And most of the places where cows now stand, trees once stood. Many of them have been recently slashed and burned.

      I love me some meat, and I eat as much as I can, but let's not pretend that it's more environmentally friendly than vegetarianism. And sadly, cows are pretty much the worst. The methane of their flatulence is a significant greenhouse gas and the deforestation their existence implies is part of the problem with global climate today.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re: What is it? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There's already a brand of adult diapers called that. Nearly.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:What is it? by sribe · · Score: 1

      We are not omnivores.

      Yes, we are.

      Why aren't you sucking milk from a cow's udders, or a pig's udders, or an elephant's udders?

      ???

      You have no idea why you AREN'T vegan, that's the most pathetic thing about it all.

      I bet he does, and I know I sure as hell do ;-)

    35. Re:What is it? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Eating an animal living off of marginal grasslands is a much more carbon friendly option for humans than trying to grow anything on such land.

      Which is all well and good, but most meat isn't produced like that, at least in countries like the US and UK.

      Do you know what a feedlot is?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re:What is it? by Agent0013 · · Score: 2

      And yes, you simply don't CARE about the unending suffering of billions of animals. Care to explain why?

      And why don't you care about the suffering of the plants? Do you think they don't feel pain? They certainly do. They even communicate to each other when being attacked by insects or bacteria and viruses. You care about one life form over another, but that does not mean anything in the grand scheme. You probably have no problem swatting a mosquito that is biting you, or pulling a tick out of your skin and killing it. Life feeds on life. Get used to it!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    37. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm try googling the "Just Mayo" controversy and you will get your only unbiased question. The rest is just you prejudging their products. Personally I found the lawsuit just hilarious esp when their customers pointed out to Unilever via social media that several Unilever products are falsely adverted by the same mechanics ie they sell stuff called X when its really made from a substitute for X. Think it was mayo dressing rather than mayo.

    38. Re:What is it? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Conservation of energy - that fungus grows on biomass.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  2. are you kidding ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you kidding ?
    and how much did you pay for this advertisement ?

  3. Eggbeaters, is that you? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Eggbeaters, is that you?

    1. Re:Eggbeaters, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eggbeaters are made from egg. Sorry.

  4. Let's talk about the obvious by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

    To really be the "future of food" there's one critical, fundamental hurdle to cross, regardless of economics, marketing, food quality, and business sense:

    Net energy.

    Making eggs the natural way is requires about 100x the calories in the egg in solar energy to feed the chickens, due to the metabolism of the chickens and plants involved in that process.

    If your process can't beat nature, you're never going to save the world with your technology, because you're going to be less efficient than the real thing.

    Can you beat nature? Hypothetically? In the future?

  5. Fact? Assertion? Slogan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hampton Creek is a food technology company that makes food healthier by utilizing (canola oil, lemon juice and pea protein) in food products"
    Is the food's improved healthfulness a fact or an assertion?

    1. Re:Fact? Assertion? Slogan? by blippo · · Score: 1

      I think egg's are as healthy that anything can be.

      Especially with regards to recent research.

      Fake eggs may be cheaper though, and probably taste like shit.

    2. Re:Fact? Assertion? Slogan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, obviously their fake eggs don't make foods healthier; they just make them vegan.

    3. Re:Fact? Assertion? Slogan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially with regards to recent research.

      Like various research that finds high correlation between various issues and people who eat on average more than one egg a day? Eggs are fine in moderation with no correlation for those that eat less than one a day. In which case I would prefer to eat an actual cooked egg for breakfast each day instead of mixed into various things if there are suitable substitutes.

    4. Re:Fact? Assertion? Slogan? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      We are ultimately talking about a CONDIMENT here. It should not really matter how "harmful" it is. You shouldn't be eating it in any quantities where this kind of issue would come up.

      Although the "harmfulness" of eggs is disputed and seems to vary like Paris fashion seasons.

      Of course Vegans are going to shout down anything animal related despite the fact that we are not bovines.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Fact? Assertion? Slogan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we are not bovines" - LOL. Whoever claimed we were? We are herbivores. We aren't supposed to drink milk after weaning, can you explain why YOU do? LOL.

    6. Re:Fact? Assertion? Slogan? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Eggs contain whatever antibiotics and hormones they feed the chickens plus the superbugs that survive the antibiotics.

      The egg industry has funded a few studies which purport to show that eggs are healthy. I'd be very skeptical of these results.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  6. Scrambled egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's the status of the "egg beaters" type substitute? What's the nutritional profile - similar to egg? Is it cheaper to produce over normal eggs?

    I've been vegan for a while and find scrambled tofu with some spices (especially black salt) to be a tasty substitute.

  7. Why would it be healthier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with out eggs? please don't say it because of Cholesterol

    1. Re:Why would it be healthier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have your cholesterol numbers where your doctor wants them.

      Of course, it'd be better if there were a correct range and failing that correlated to increased heart disease, rather than the pharma advertisers having to -directly disclaim in the ads- there is any demonstrable correlation between cholesterol and heart disease, but hey, it isn't the companies claiming a particular number is good, it's you and your doctor saying that. What "your doctor wants." If you buy into it for no scientific reason, that's your or your doctor's problem, not the pharma company's. But they won't mind if you go ahead and think "your" rationale they "suggested" to you has scientific merit, and buy their drugs anyway.

      Awesomely fraudulent evidentiary and responsibility sleight-of-hand, if you think about it. I think it would take the combined efforts of marketing -and- legal to come up with this one.

    2. Re:Why would it be healthier... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You can eat 2 eggs for breakfast every day of your life and your blood test numbers can still be not just acceptable but enough to get you a discount on your life insurance.

      A little self-awareness goes a long way.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  8. Well, it's not mayonaise ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh hey, it's another one of those Dot Com Millionaires should be able to break the law stories.

    1. Re:Well, it's not mayonaise ... by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      Looking at info on this, it says they've actually never marketed it as "mayonnaise" but instead only as "mayo" ... so they might get by on a technicality on this one.

      Also, there is no actual law defining "mayonnaise", just a definition used by the FDA. (Anyone who actually knows care to comment on how binding an FDA definition is to a product line, and if they can change it on the fly to new definitions?)

    2. Re:Well, it's not mayonaise ... by turning+in+circles · · Score: 1

      The European Union has a very specific definition of mayonnaise that includes emulsified oils and eggs, and in the EU, food ingredients in named foods are enforced. Here there is a consumer awareness standard of reasonability in play, or I think that is the case. Would a consumer be fooled into thinking there were eggs here?

      --
      Might as well face it I'm addicted to data.
    3. Re:Well, it's not mayonaise ... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The also have a big picture of an EGG on the package.

      It's called "Just Mayo". It's not called "Vegan Mayo". They are going out of their way to appear like an artisinal brand of actual mayonnaise rather than some purveyor of shoddy "substitutes".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  9. How many potatoes does it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What have you done that is more cost effective than growing a potato?

  10. Vegan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it vegan?

  11. Just Mayo? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Can anyone here compare the Hampton Creek "Just Mayo" in taste and texture versus Vegenaise?

    1. Re:Just Mayo? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I've tried both and the Just Mayo is much better. I found the Vegenaise to have a weird consistency like poorly set up custard and the flavor wasn't great.
      Just Mayo has a great consistency and flavor... as good as "real" mayonnaise.
      (This is just my opinion, YMMV)

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:Just Mayo? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      The other ones I've tried are Nayonaise (hated the smell and taste) and Spectrum Naturals Eggless Canola Mayonnaise (has the texture of flour/water glue and a weak taste).

    3. Re:Just Mayo? by millert · · Score: 1

      Just Mayo tastes much better than Vegenaise. My son has a severe egg allergy so we've eliminated eggs from our diet. To my taste buds, Just Mayo tastes as good as Hellmanns, which is probably why Unilever is so upset...

    4. Re:Just Mayo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just Mayo tastes as good as Hellmanns, which is probably why Unilever is so upset...

      On the other hand, manufactured outraged about trivial things like the proper definition of "mayo" is exactly what makes the news these days. Unilever risks a significant Streisand effect here.

      Myself, I love mayonnaise but don't buy it out of concern for the chickens. And I even eat less at restaurants that use mayonnaise. For example, I really like Subway subs but without mayonnaise, they taste very dry to me - i.e. not worth eating. Since I don't like the thought of inflicting suffering on chickens when I have other alternatives that are almost, but not quite, as enjoyable I still eat at Subway occasionally but not as often as if they had a vegan mayonnaise available.

      Anyway, I hadn't yet heard of this Just Mayo stuff but now thank to Unilever, I'm planning to try some. And, if it's as good as Slashdot is claiming, then I'll recommend it to my friends and family who are also concerned about the chickens.

  12. Omelettes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you make omelettes with it?

  13. false advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The slashdot summary starts with the following statement "Hampton Creek is a food technology company that makes food healthier by utilizing a specially made egg substitute in food products". This statement implies that real eggs are not healthy which is not true. Real eggs, especially those that come from happy flocks of free range hens, are a super health food. Fake egg products are not healthy.

    How can you operate a business which is based upon a a false premise?

    1. Re:false advertising by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Your comment ends with the following statement "Fake egg products are not healthy". How is your statement true? Have you seen the list of ingredients in fake mayo? Most of them are made with natural, plant-based ingredients. Have you seen the list of ingredients in real mayonnaise? Some of them have chemicals and preservatives in them because they're made with eggs.

    2. Re:false advertising by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Bark is a plant based natural ingredient, that doesn't necessarily make it healthy to consume.

    3. Re:false advertising by Kergan · · Score: 1

      Most of them are made with natural, plant-based ingredients.

      Cyanide is present in apricot, apple and peach seeds -- it's a natural, plant-based ingredient. That doesn't make it healthy.

      An egg, in contrast, contains everything you need to turn a single cell into a grown chick. It's probably healthy.

    4. Re:false advertising by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that it's not safe to eat apricots, apples and peaches, but it's safe to eat chicken bones.

      We could play with words like that all day long, the fact of the matter is that the original parent said "Fake egg products are not healthy" without stating any facts or even fake arguments against them.

    5. Re:false advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that it's not safe to eat apricots, apples and peaches, but it's safe to eat chicken bones.

      No he's not. You're either a troll, a shill, or illiterate.

  14. Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Maxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would you call something Mayo that isn't?

    Are your other product names as equally misleading?

    1. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Do a google search for "mayonnaise recipe" and tell us which one is defacto Mayonnaise, because inquiring minds would like it put to bed, thanks.

      --
      Bye!
    2. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by DutchUncle · · Score: 2

      Agreement. I have no objection to a vegetarian alternative to egg-based mayonnaise; OTOH I can see Hellman's point that calling it "just mayo" isn't right. When I first saw the name "Just Mayo" I assumed it was non-preservative, or no-added-whatever, or non-GMO, or some other health-food variant of "pure"; I did NOT infer that it was other-than-dictionary-definition-of mayonnaise.

      In contrast, I don't have the same issue with "soy milk" or "almond milk" not being some mammal's milk, like the dairy industry is complaining about, because the non-milk-base ingredient is right there in the name.

    3. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Maxwell · · Score: 2

      Why not let the Food and Drug Administration an the Code of federal Regulations Title 21 tell you, exactly, what the legal definition of Mayonnaise is?

      To quote:

      a) "Description. Mayonnaise is the emulsified semisolid food prepared from vegetable oil(s), one or both of the acidifying ingredients specified in paragraph (b) of this section, and one or more of the egg yolk-containing ingredients specified in paragraph (c) of this section."

      source:
      http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=169.140

      Now that that is put to bed, care to explain how something that doesn't include eggs, as specified by the FDA, can be called Mayo?

    4. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

      I agree as well. This product should be renamed from "Just Mayo" to "Pea Mayo". I doubt it'd sell well, though.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      If it includes eggs and some kind of oil I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt. If it doesn't it's not Mayonnaise or Mayo. There is nothing wrong with making substitutes but they need to be clearly labeled.

    6. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by blue9steel · · Score: 2

      Which is why Soy Milk should be labeled Soy Juice.

    7. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do agree with everything you said. I will point out that is the description of Mayonnaise. This is Mayo. We may associate that shorthand with Mayonnaise, but history is filled with ambiguous abbreviated forms.

    8. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this not intentionally deceptive?

    9. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by jtara · · Score: 1

      It's a legit question.

      And that's why Hellman's themselves then had to scramble to clean-up their marketing materials and website and stop using the term "mayo" for some of their own products of theirs that don't contain any "egg product" (what? Did you think it contained EGGS?! ROFLMAO!)

      Hellman's invalided their own complaint, by their prior use of "mayo" for non-egg-producting-containing spreads. Maybe not legally, but morally. They can't go back and retroactively change the fact that they've been using the term "mayo" improperly themselves for years.

    10. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple. fat, lemon juice, and egg whipped together. nothing else is mayonnaise.

    11. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you call something Mayo that isn't?

      Mayo isn't a legally protected & defined term in the USA for food. Mayonnaise is.

      Oddly enough, many Hellmann's products labelled mayonnaise didn't meet the US govt's requirements to be labelled as mayonnaise either: http://www.usatoday.com/story/...

      And frankly, mayonnaise is disgusting.

      In the words of Undercover Brother ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... ), it's the white man's hot sauce :)

    12. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have to prove intent. Hampton Creek's marketing and labeling of the product, especially the ingredients list, has never claimed Just Mayo is mayonnaise, as far as I know.

    13. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they're sore about is hilarious in my opinion because the words "real" (== just) and "mayo" are not regulated terms by the USDA. They're being as honest as any other mayonnaise manufacturer.

    14. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Hellman's invalided their own complaint, by their prior use of "mayo" for non-egg-producting-containing spreads.

      Or: Hellman's validated their own complaint by halting use of the term "mayo" for any of their own products that do not contain any "egg product"?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    15. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      That's non sequitur.

    16. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      It does logically follow because we're discussing the misleading labeling of products.

    17. Re:Why would you call something Mayo that isn't? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      I'd advise against putting mayonnaise in your bed, it'll ruin your mattress.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  15. Eggs = Good by unixcorn · · Score: 3

    Eggs are one of the best sources of protein, are natural and can be produced easily in a back yard chicken house. I have also read that most of the rhetoric about eggs being unhealthy has been debunked. Unless you are producing specifically for people with allergies, what's the point of an eggs substitute.

    1. Re:Eggs = Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you are producing specifically for people with allergies, what's the point of an eggs substitute.

      Vegetarians. (Duh.)

    2. Re:Eggs = Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegetarians have no problem with eating eggs. I think the term you are looking for is *vegans*.

    3. Re:Eggs = Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ultra-low cholesterol diets come to mind. Ethical issues. I'm sure there's some religious case for it somewhere.
       
      I'm sure your average person doesn't have a problem with eggs but there is a large enough segment of people who need to stay away from cholesterol. It certainly doesn't hurt.

    4. Re:Eggs = Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eggs are one of the best sources of protein, are natural and can be produced easily in a back yard chicken house. I have also read that most of the rhetoric about eggs being unhealthy has been debunked. Unless you are producing specifically for people with allergies, what's the point of an eggs substitute.

      So on of those egg council creeps got you too?

    5. Re:Eggs = Good by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Eggs are one of the best sources of protein, are natural and can be produced easily in a back yard chicken house. I have also read that most of the rhetoric about eggs being unhealthy has been debunked. Unless you are producing specifically for people with allergies, what's the point of an eggs substitute.

      To get the same amount of food (mayo in this case) you have to put 20x more energy into the process to get it from a chicken egg, vs getting it from a pea plant. So at scale, it would be a far cheaper way to arrive at mayo. Today this means less cost to make a nice sandwich, but continued development could lead to far lower cost, but still tasty alternatives to mainstream protein sources.

    6. Re:Eggs = Good by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      An egg is a food capsule for a baby animal. That means that everything that is required for the development of a small animal is in there. That sounds like something that is obviously going to be some kind of super food.

      The same goes for milk.

      Plant equivalents will likely be less impressive because they are designed with the end result of creating a plant rather than a mammal or a bird.

      The usual hatchet job studies against eggs typically find against lack of moderation. If you simply follow the nutritional guidelines that predate the guerilla vegan politics at the USDA, you should not have any troubles.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Eggs = Good by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except most of the pea plant is completely inedible to a human.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Eggs = Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you on the vegan warriors, but ... milk?

      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/18/upshot/got-milk-might-not-be-doing-you-much-good.html?_r=0

    9. Re:Eggs = Good by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      It does hurt, it's a false dogma that's now outdated science as much as bleeding the patient is.

    10. Re:Eggs = Good by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Cheese is more of a "super food" for me (esp. if it's better than Cheeseburger cheese and similar), full of fat and proteins and better adapted to adult consumption than milk. Milk is for children (but doesn't really hurt in coffee, mashed potatoes etc.). Yet cheese is expensive (5 to 20 euros per kg or more) which is a good proxy as how energy intensive it is.

      I have a somewhat "cheese first" eating policy regarding (animal) proteins, which I ought to turn into "eggs first" instead (and I ought to cut on the horrid processed pork in some of the stuff I buy, which is the "meat" I deign to buy.)

    11. Re:Eggs = Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know plenty of vegans who are doing fine. Medical testing proves the same thing. The dogma is on your end.

    12. Re:Eggs = Good by sribe · · Score: 1

      I'm sure your average person doesn't have a problem with eggs but there is a large enough segment of people who need to stay away from cholesterol.

      Not really. That voodoo has been pretty much debunked by now.

      Very low sodium diets are next, BTW ;-)

  16. Not sure this deserves any attention. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with eating eggs? Eggs are great and tasty and cruelty free! *for the most part*

  17. Does Shortening a name change it? by turning+in+circles · · Score: 2

    Hi, I assume you argue that "Mayo" is a different word than "Mayonnaise," so there is no problem marketing "Just Mayo" or "Chipotle Mayo" as a mayonnaise substitute (without the word "substitute" on the front of the label). How would you feel about going to the store and getting some "OJ" that had no juice from oranges? If I read a label that said "Just OJ", I would assume it had only orange juice.

    How would you feel about putting an image of eggs and a cross through them or some other way to quickly identify this is eggless mayonnaise substitute, and not mayonnaise?

    --
    Might as well face it I'm addicted to data.
    1. Re:Does Shortening a name change it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ever tried to buy cranberry juice? You can't at most grocery stores, and you can't even tell how much cranberry juice is actually in the mix. Yet, I asked for a glass of cranberry juice with breakfast this morning and they served it right up. Of course it wasn't actually even mostly cranberry juice, it was mostly apple. I suspect if you asked 1000 random shoppers if they were sure that mayonnaise always has eggs in it, you'd be hard pressed to find 10 that were sure. In fact, if you ask it that way, I'll bet you that the majority of people who were "sure" would be sure that mayonnaise doesn't always have eggs.

      Normally I'm all about truth in business. If you offer to sell me something, you'd damn well better provide what you said you would or I'm going to make you wish you had. With foods that require preparation, however, I know that I have to look at ingredients and I think everyone else does too. Sure, "Just Mayo" may be questionable as a choice of a name, but I wouldn't feel ripped off if I purchased it without reading the ingredients either.

    2. Re:Does Shortening a name change it? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      I assume you argue that "Mayo" is a different word than "Mayonnaise," so there is no problem marketing "Just Mayo" or "Chipotle Mayo" as a mayonnaise substitute (without the word "substitute" on the front of the label). How would you feel about going to the store and getting some "OJ" that had no juice from oranges? If I read a label that said "Just OJ", I would assume it had only orange juice.

        How would you feel about putting an image of eggs and a cross through them or some other way to quickly identify this is eggless mayonnaise substitute, and not mayonnaise?

      That's funny, half the people I mentioned mayo to (admittedly, mostly young) said "its made from eggs? *uncooked* eggs?? how weird" I think that once this whole naming thing is settled with the FDA, whatever they end up calling it, no one will bat an eye that it's egg free as long as it tastes good.

    3. Re:Does Shortening a name change it? by turning+in+circles · · Score: 1

      Just as ignorance of the law is no defense, ignorance of the meaning of common words, I would argue, is no defense either. OTOH, it sounds delicious so I hope to try some.

      --
      Might as well face it I'm addicted to data.
  18. Plant based evidence for environmental benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What evidence do you point to when making the case that a plan-based diet is less destructive to the environment compared to eating animals and animal products? The environmental impact of my food choices has been the major factor in switching to a plant-based diet, but I struggle to find concise, creditable data on the impact of my choices, specifically around the amount of energy, water, land, and green house emissions that are saved. Has Hampton Creek done anything to aggregate and present good research in this area? Can you make any specific claims or projections about the environmental impact of using your products?

    1. Re:Plant based evidence for environmental benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its self evident. you don't need a study to prove 8% is less than 100%. All things equal, plants are less destructive than animal based diets. Animals convert plants to meat at less than perfect efficiency.

  19. Beating nature isn't that ahrd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can substitute some of the component for less energetic component, like "just mayo" does : using a variety of pea instead of egg. If there are any energy cost then it will be reflected in price already. Furthermore it is really misleading, since the food we gave our animals (cow, pig, chicken, ducks) was actually either inedible left over, or pasturage which was not used for food. Who cares if it takes 10000* more energy to make a pound of beef to a pound of wheat (or whatever factor) if anyway that energy would be lost.

    But frankly, I (egoistically) do not care about energy cost. I do care only about the taste. If just mayo taste better than mayonnaise, i am for it. if not, well don't put it in my plate. I would rather buy LESS of a better tasting things, than tons of crap.

    1. Re:Beating nature isn't that ahrd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you leave the internet and go to a farm. We sure as hell don't feed our cattle "inedible left overs" or "pasturage which isn't useful." We let them graze, cut for silage in the summer, and augment with minerals to keep them healthy. No hormones or other lies you see in leftist websites.

  20. 3D printing, food allergies, and shelf life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's a question I've always wanted to ask one of these food-science guys:

    How far are we from being able to mass-produce foodstuffs, growing yeast or simple bacteria in a tank, converting it into a long-shelf-life shelf-stable package, and being able to print it out 3-D printer style to make lunch? Especially for those of us who cannot eat gluten, dairy, eggs, soy, peanuts, etc.. It seems like the holy grail of food technology. Food replicators, but running with milliliter (or larger) droplet sizes rather than nanoliter droplet sizes to rapidly print & cook food. Kind of like a microwave, with large (replaceable) ink-cartridge-like containers on the side where you just tell it what you want, wait, and boom dinner is created, cooked, & ready to serve.

    1. Re:3D printing, food allergies, and shelf life... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      You can get a 3D-printed Oreo cookie, that's a start.

  21. Bill Gates ... by J.+L.+Tympanum · · Score: 1

    ... should burn in Hell.

  22. Solyent Green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it made from people?

  23. Healthier sans eggs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call bullshit unless you're a tubby with a predisposition for heart disease who refuses to stay on either a high protein/low carb, or ketogenic, diet.

  24. high carb vrs low carb by layabout · · Score: 1

    http://annals.org/article.aspx... This article is one study in a long line of studies that show that a low (40g/day) carb diet is healthier than a high carb one. how does the future of food keep diets under 40 carbs per day and still supply enough calories? assume 1200 cals for a woman and 2000 for a man. 30 cals/carb and 50 cals/carb respectively

  25. Just Mayo is DELICIOUS, too! by jtara · · Score: 1

    I took notice when I saw the stories about Hellman's suing Hampton Creek. Oh, the irony, when Hellman's had to change their own marketing once they realized that they, themselves, have been using the term "mayo" to describe non-egg-containing spread!

    Just Mayo is available in the refrigerated section at Whole Foods, and they have trouble keeping it in stock. It is really that delicious! Last time I took it through the check-out there was a scramble as the employees went to claim a jar once they knew it was back in.

    Most shelf-stable "mayo-like" spreads you find on the shelf do not contain any egg. The thing is, it's difficult to make a shelf-stable product that contains eggs! You need to load it up with preservatives. "Real mayonnaise" on the aisle? It's kinda-mayonaise.

    Yes, the pendulum has swung-back on eggs. For those (like me) who do NOT have an egg allergy or some other reason to avoid eggs, we should take another look at eggs - I have. I stopped removing half the yolks from omelets, for example. We learn a bit about food, we over-react, we learn a bit more.

    Here's the ingredients for Just Mayo. Pretty short list:

    - Non-GMO expeller-pressed Canola Oil
    - Filtered Water
    - Lemon Juice (note that "lemon juice" means "lemon juice" not some reconstituted concentrate, extract, or citric acid...)
    - White vinegar
    - 2% or less of the following:
    - Organic sugar
    - Salt
    - Pea protein
    - Spices
    - Modified food starch
    - Beta-Carotene

    The only thing suspect here is the Pea protein, because I imagine it is a highly-processed ingredient. Hopefully not made in China.

    They don't say, but I'd guess the modified food starch is Tapioca Maltodextrin. I have a big bucket of the stuff in my pantry. It's magic stuff.

    When I want actual mayonnaise, I make my own actual mayonnaise. It's quick and easy to make up in a food processor, but of course then there's the cleanup. Egg yolk (you can pasteurize if you like easily in a sous-vide' cooker - I don't), salt, lemon juice, olive oil. You can keep it a few days, but best fresh. I wouldn't touch any of that stuff in a jar. Even in the refrigerated section, real mayonnaise is impractical to sell in a supermarket. I would not call anything that Hellman's sells "real mayonnaise", though they are allowed by law to call some of it such.

    Unfortunately, most people don't know what real mayonnaise tastes like any more, and if you serve it to others they will say "what is this"? So, screw em' I reserve this for myself.

    If I want to make a quick tunafish sandwich - I use Just Mayo. It tastes way better than that shelf-stable stuff from Hellman's

    1. Re:Just Mayo is DELICIOUS, too! by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      Here's the ingredients for Just Mayo. Pretty short list:

      ... - Pea protein...

      If I want to make a quick tunafish sandwich - I use Just Mayo. It tastes way better than that shelf-stable stuff from Hellman's

      So, you might say you love the pea-ness?

  26. Eggs are a very healthy food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eggs are a nutrition powerhouse:

    http://www.webmd.com/diet/features/good-eggs-for-nutrition-theyre-hard-to-beat
    http://www.jillianmichaels.com/fit/lose-weight/myth-eggs

    With science on our side, we can once again enjoy the wonderfully nutritious egg. Along with milk, eggs contain the highest biological value (or gold standard) for protein. One egg has only 75 calories but 7 grams of high-quality protein, 5 grams of fat, and 1.6 grams of saturated fat, along with iron, vitamins, minerals, and carotenoids.

    The egg is a powerhouse of disease-fighting nutrients like lutein and zeaxanthin. These carotenoids may reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration, the leading cause of blindness in older adults. And brain development and memory may be enhanced by the choline content of eggs.

    The real threat to high cholesterol is saturated and trans fats, not dietary cholesterol. Years ago, when scientists learned that high blood cholesterol was associated with heart disease, foods high in cholesterol were thought to be the leading cause of unhealthy blood cholesterol. Now, 25 years later, scientists have come to the conclusion that cholesterol in food is not the true villain — saturated and trans fats have a much greater effect on blood cholesterol. Your body actually needs the cholesterol in meat and eggs to make testosterone, which helps to increase energy and helps to build more calorie-building muscle. In fact, one study at the University of Connecticut found that the fat in egg yolks actually helps to reduce LDL (“bad” cholesterol). So banish the old notion that an egg, specifically the yolk, is hazardous to your health. According to the American Heart Association, the recommended limit of dietary cholesterol is 300 milligrams for people with normal LDL (bad) cholesterol levels — and one egg contains 185 milligrams of dietary cholesterol. (If you have a history of high cholesterol or heart disease in your family, though, you may want to consult your doctor about how to limit your cholesterol intake.)

    Whole eggs are full of beneficial vitamins and minerals. Whole eggs are a nearly perfect food, with almost every essential vitamin and mineral our bodies need to function. It is one of the few natural food sources of vitamin D and contains 7 grams of high-quality protein. Whole eggs are also full of omega-3 fatty acids and deliver many of the B vitamins and nutrients — B6, B12, riboflavin, folate, and choline — that, in fact, are believed to help prevent heart disease. L-arginine, an amino acid found in eggs, are critical to the body's production of protein and the release of growth hormones. Another amino acid found in eggs, leucine, also helps the body produce growth hormones as well as regulate blood sugar levels. The yolk itself contains most of these vitamins and minerals, plus half of its protein. When you eat only the egg whites, you’re missing out on all of these nutritional benefits and are getting only 3.5 grams, or half, of the protein.

    1. Re:Eggs are a very healthy food by jtara · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      But you can't put egg yolks in a jar and put it on a shelf for months without refrigeration.

      Not without preservatives and/or by using some processed "egg product" instead of whole, fresh, egg yolks. You'll never catch Hellman's saying they use whole, fresh, egg yolks, because it's impossible to make their products with them.

    2. Re:Eggs are a very healthy food by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But you can't put egg yolks in a jar and put it on a shelf for months without refrigeration.

      What? Who told you that?

      Not without preservatives and/or by using some processed "egg product" instead of whole, fresh, egg yolks.

      The citric acid in the lemon juice is sufficient once you've pasteurized the eggs. What it won't do is keep for years, which is why Hellman's mayo contains Disodium EDTA.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Soy and Almond milk ISN'T, though. by jtara · · Score: 1

    | In contrast, I don't have the same issue with "soy milk" or "almond milk" not being some mammal's milk

    I don't know why.

    Soy "milk" and Almond "milk" aren't milk. At all. They aren't even milk substitutes.

    They are marketing terms for some white gunk made from soy or almond that has nothing to do with milk. Not by source, not by nutritional content, not by any stretch of the imagination.

    Some people enjoy this white gunk, some people think it's beneficial in some way, and some people who can't drink milk because of allergies or other adverse reactions see it as a godsend.

    But it is not milk, which is a natural, minimally-processed product that comes from mammals. Soy or Almond "milk" is a product manufactured from natural ingrediants.

    Mayonnaise, on the other hand, is a manufactured product. One might argue about it's composition.

    1. Re:Soy and Almond milk ISN'T, though. by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Another older example: coconut milk. I've never heard any debate about that particular usage, so the "almond milk" vs "almond juice" argument seems a bit silly to me.

      Has anyone asked the cows what they thought about the whole thing?

    2. Re:Soy and Almond milk ISN'T, though. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      I explained why. They're called "something milk", not just "milk". Nobody mistakes "peanut butter" for "butter", either.

  28. Why would I buy your product? by futuresheep · · Score: 2

    Your product offers no benefit in calorie intake compared to regular mayo and none of the nutritional benefits of mayo made with eggs. Eggs are one of the most nutritionally sound food items I can buy. As a component in other foods, they're low calorie, high protein, and chock full of vitamins, minerals, and amino acids addition. Just Mayo is also more expensive than real mayo. So tell me, why should I buy your product?

    1. Re:Why would I buy your product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some People make ethical decisions about food beyond the immediate "Oh, goody! It's healthier." Additionally, I challenge You to document and demonstrate the claimed health benefits of mayonnaise made with Chicken eggs versus Just Mayo with independent testing and verification.

    2. Re:Why would I buy your product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't matter what was presented to you. You believe whatever you're told by the egg industry, so discussion with you is futile.

    3. Re:Why would I buy your product? by doug141 · · Score: 1

      So your mayo money isn't used to do this to chickens: https://www.google.com/search?...

  29. Since when are eggs unhealthy? by Kergan · · Score: 1

    "Hampton Creek is a food technology company that makes food healthier by utilizing a specially made egg substitute in food products."

    Why would an egg be unhealthy? Leaving anecdotical and not-so-anecdotical data aside, that little shell arguably contains every nutrient needed to turn a single cell into a full blown and healthy chick.

    "Hampton Creek's latest product is called, Just Cookies, which is an eggless chocolate chip cookie dough"

    Sounds like something sugary... That would be healthy?

  30. Here's a question by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Are your products available outside of the U.S.A.? Do you have any Canadian distributors/resellers?

  31. Bogus by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Eggs are one of the most perfect foods. Eggs are something anyone can produce in their own home with a chicken, or better yet, in their yard. Feed it scraps and you get free eggs. We keep about 300 chickens out on pasture. We don't have to buy any feed for them because they eat insects and other pests. The result is we get tens of thousands of nearly free eggs which are rich in protein, healthy fats and other nutrients. Corporations can't improve on eggs - they're just jealous because they can't make enough money on eggs. Accept no substitutes.

    1. Re:Bogus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you treat your chickens far better than most. But what do you do with the males? I've seen videos where the male chicks were separated out from the female chicks and piled to into large plastic bags to be crushed and suffocated to death. The though of what it would be like to be slowly crushed and suffocated to death as a helpless little chick with no understanding of why I was being subjected to a slow death has tended to put me off eggs.

    2. Re:Bogus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the kittens now

    3. Re:Bogus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We eat male chickens. They're good eating.

      What you describe would be a waste. I also suspect it is a myth as it would be considered inhumane and cracked down on by the government - there are laws against such things. Myths like you describe are perpetuated by vegans as part of their arsenal of lies.

  32. Astroturfers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of the negative comments and questions do you think are made by shills for the multibillion dollar agribusiness industry? Who really gives a shit what Just Mayo is called? Who really gives a shit if people want to buy egg substitutes over eggs?

  33. Let's Move Beyond Health.. by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    Besides human health, why might we want to consider eliminating superfluous eggs from mayo and other foods? How much land is consumed by livestock in the US and globally? To satisfy the 'back yard' and 'free range' crowd, how much MORE space would be needed in order to supply the world's demand for eggs in these flavours? What sort of demand on resources do eggs and animal products consume, especially in comparison to plant foods? What is their estimated contribution to climate change? Can you compare the resource consumption of a jar of Just Mayo and Hellmann's Mayonnaise? (How much energy consumed, space usage, emissions, etc..) Same with your egg replacement, and equivalent amount of eggs?

    Full disclosure - i'm already well aware of these things, and would implore readers interested in these matters to check out a blog post i wrote covering how much land livestock already consume...you will very likely be surprised: http://blog.thevictoriavegan.com/2014/10/humane-meat-its-not-humane-for-nature.html

  34. Cholesterol, GMO, and "artificial" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you elaborate on you decisions to completely avoid cholesterol, GMO, and "artificial" flavor?
    Are these decisions based on science, marketing, policy (e.g. patents or trade restrictions)?

    As far as I know cholesterol isn't bad in moderation, many "artificial" flavors are chemically indistinguishable from their "natural" counterparts, and there has been no conclusive evidence that GMOs are harmful.

  35. Disrupting the global egg industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is "[your] research is particularly focused on disrupting the global egg industry"?

    Thanks for doing the interview.

  36. Your favorite food hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since your business is food and you spend a lot of time thinking/experimenting on it - could you put together some interesting stories, inspirational ideas, non-obvious flavor combinations, or simply your favorite recipies that many people would be unlikely to encounter?

  37. Research and the daily grind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could everyone describe how your day-to-day work and goals are? Answers from the R&D people would be especially appreciated.

  38. Frustrated with lack of scientific understanding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As scientists, are you ever frustrated with lack of scientific understanding of the public?
    I'm a molecular biologist and am always frustrated with the negative perception of science as artificial/sterile/zombie-apocalypse-inducing/playing god in the public's eyes. Do you have any reservations about marketing towards this anti-GMO, "All natural flavor, nothing artificial" demographic in a way that caters to their anti-science perception?

  39. 'healthy' ingredients by swell · · Score: 1

    Do you still believe the 1945 science that says eating cholesterol will cause you to have high cholesterol? Have you reviewed any papers since that time? Science has improved, please consider doing the same. Eat a delicious egg while you think about it.

    Cookies with sugar in them? Yeah, that's healthy! Why not make an 'all natural' cola drink while you're at it and load it with 'all natural' sugar? Learn about xylitol for a healthier alternative. But, even better, stop promoting an already dangerous addiction to sweets.

    It appears from your ingredient list that there is no flour in your cookies; "chocolate chip | sugar | oatmeal raisin | peanut butter" - can that be true? Flour can be as deadly as sugar and there is no healthy way to consume either for most people.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...