Samsung's Open Source Group Is Growing, Hiring Developers
jones_supa writes Almost two years ago, Samsung's open source team was just one person: Linux and FOSS advocate Ibrahim Haddad, head of the open source group at Samsung Research America. The new Open Source Innovation Group at Samsung is now 40 people strong, including 30 developers, devoted full-time to working on upstream projects and shepherding open source development into the company. The group is hiring aggressively and plans to double the size of the group in the coming years. Their first targets are project maintainers and key contributors to 23 open source projects that are integral to Samsung's products, including Linux, Gstreamer, FFmpeg, Blink, Webkit, EFL, and Wayland. They plan to eventually start hiring more junior open source developers as well. Just about every Samsung product, from phones and tablets to home appliances, uses open source software, said Guy Martin, senior open source strategist at Samsung. Martin also mentions the importance of funding: "You already see this in the Linux kernel, where most people who contribute are paid to contribute. And you'll see that more and more."
Yeah but then you have to work for Samsung. Isn't there any other place to work for? Like Roto Rooter?
You don't hire to make open source. You hire those to USE open source. A lot cheaper to hire maintenance than to hire those who create.
http://news.slashdot.org/story...
EVIL: A Growth Industry!
We're ALWAYS hiring.
and make it possible to use your smartphones with OS'es other than yours. That should also include your stylus input, for which you are currently market leader. I'd have almost bought one of your devices, but when I found out CM doesn't support it because of driver problems I gave it back.
Let em all commie pinko liberals talk you into gay sex it's better than it sounds and who cares about them men they're all ugly so you don't have to pick
I recently replaced my problem-ridden Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini with a Motorola Moto G, and the switch has been pure joy despite lower spec and a low quality camera. But gone are all the Samsung customizatons, the extra apps that came with the phone which you could not be sure whether you could uninstall, and the annoying Samsung account. I would be more enthusiastic about their open source efforts if they built less cumbersome products, rather than taking stock Android and adding layers of unneeded and unwanted stuff - just so they can "own the customer" by bringing them into their own ecosystem.
For a company like Samsung, the software stack used in their phones is very important to them. Kernel support for BLE, for example, affects their revenue. A couple of paid programmers can have significant influence on a software stack that is behind BILLIONS is revenue for Samsung. They'd be incredibly stupid to sit their and let other companies have 100% control of the software they rely on rather than spend a thousands of dollars to protect and expand their billions in revenue.
As an example, my predecessor was a system administrator. He spent his days maintaining the system, compiling data from the system into reports, working around issues with the system, and helping other users maintain their projects on the system, compile reports they need from data on the system, etc.
I'm a developer of the system, not a maintainer. I don't compile reports we need each month, I write a module once which AUTOMATICALLY generates the report when it's needed. I don't have a routine of constantly explaining to users how to work around a limitation in the system, I fix the limitation. Compared to the old way of doing things, having an admin for the system, I probably save my employer several times my salary each year. There is basically no cost to my employer because previously they were already paying someone to administer the system. For the same pay, I administer AND develop the system to better fit their needs. Part of that development work consists of eliminating the need to do much adminstration work.
I needed to replace my printer recently, I looked around for something that would work with CentOS 6 and the price of ink per page was reasonable. I was looking at a Samsung one - no mention of Linux; by the time that they replied to an email (10 days later) I had bought an HP multi function printer. So: they lost a sale because they could not be bothered to document what they had done.
The HP web site was excellent, each model of printer and what was supported by a wide variety of Linux distros. Unfortunately: I could not make it work, the support people said that it was a s/ware fault and then refused to do anything about it: https://answers.launchpad.net/hplip/+question/255970
I sent the HP printer back and then bought a Brother printer - no problem, worked once I downloaded the driver.
I can't wait until someone hacks my oven and burns my turkey.
I have long respected both Samsung's commitment to R&D and the general quality of their hardware. Unfortunately, they have never quite managed to couple this with well thought out firmware and software. I hope they are intending to package best in class open source components with an intelligent framework. If so, I am sure the quality of their offerings will improve markedly.
They used to have Richardson, TX offices, and I could've worked there.
Samsung wants to learn to do software now? Last time I checked, all their apps looked like they were done in Flash by someone making a living doing flashy myspace/geocities style pages. Also, judging by performance, it was the lowest bidder.
Samsung is first and foremost and hardware manufacturer: LED displays, memory, SoC chips etc.
Unfortunately, Samsung's open source group is headed by an idiot PHB with no community cred. If you can live with that, then by all means join and bask in some of that Android megabuck glow. But if you can't abide idiots and you do have talent, don't waste your time.
You know, Tizen is like Anrdoid, but more open than Android. Really. Samsung's open source group totally made that happen.
</sarcasm>
When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
You know, Tizen is like Anrdoid, but more open than Android. Really. Samsung's open source group totally made that happen.
</sarcasm>
Check your facts Tough Love - the OSG was formed *after* Tizen was created, and as a matter of fact, Guy Martin helped create the more open governance model for Tizen 3.0, which is almost like a completely separate project. It would be great if more products were based on Tizen 2.x, but yes, that branch is more like Android.
I also think you overestimate how much influence a team of 40 can have in a company the size and complexity of Samsung.
Unfortunately, Samsung's open source group is headed by an idiot PHB with no community cred. If you can live with that, then by all means join and bask in some of that Android megabuck glow. But if you can't abide idiots and you do have talent, don't waste your time.
Sounds like you might a little bitter and didn't fit in with the rest of the team working hard to change perceptions....