Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Drops Bing Search Results

New submitter mrflash818 writes Facebook has dumped search results from Microsoft's Bing after the social networking giant earlier this week launched its own tool for finding comments and other information. According to Reuters, Facebook confirmed the move Friday. TechCrunch, drawing on the same Reuters story as VentureBeat, says "The report says that Facebook’s new search tool will give users the ability to filter through old comments and other information from friends. Facebook has been building out its search products for a long time, using Bing as an extra layer to provide results beyond the Interest Graph in an effort to avoid letting rival Google into the system."

33 comments

  1. Oh Goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't wait to hear the next juicy soap opera installment of As The Facebook Turns!

    Knowing Facebook dropped Bing is about as relevant to daily life as knowing that a celebrity got a divorce. Not my business. Do. Not. Care.

    1. Re:Oh Goodie by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      No, this seems like very relevant and horrible news, at least to this Slashdotter. I do NOT(!) use Facebook, but my family loves it, posting photos and all that shit. Now I need to be worried about about how I am perceived via the Facebook Walled Garden(tm) to perspective employers doing requisite background checks, since I work in I.T. Like I didn't have enough genuine concerns given my field, market, and knowledge.

      Facebook sucks.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    2. Re:Oh Goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, you don't want to work for a company that checks up on your Facebook profile.

      Just lock it down, set everything to Private/friends only, and if they ask for you to log in during an interview, thank them for their time and walk out.

  2. Good think my browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has "search google" built right in to the context menu for general Internet searching.

    1. Re:Good think my browser by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Screw all that baggage you bring up. Who cares?

      I like products that use local versions of Google where I can start my search and suggestions come up and stuff.

      Facebook search is as useless as tits on a boar hog. There's a lot of information in my personal world of Facebook and I'd like to be able to find it.

      When I go to look for stuff, I sure as hell don't spend any time doing a goddam background check on the designers of the fucking engine.

      That's another time-sucking hobby for those who are interested and having that knowledge doesn't enhance my search experience at all.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    2. Re:Good think my browser by davester666 · · Score: 1

      That's because you experienced it using bing. Now try it with native Facebook technology! It's great!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  3. Facebook search is horrible by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even trying to do a very simple thing, like search through all past facebook messages or group posts for a given word, is essentially impossible.

    I dont know where Facebook thinks they are going with their "graph search", but as of today it is absolutely horrible.

    Google is no better, with complete inability to search through Hangouts history without going into GMail of all places. You would think a search company would do better.

    1. Re:Facebook search is horrible by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I have several friends who will post/share things on their wall to "find later." Yeah, there's pretty much no way you're going to find that later unless you manually scroll through pages and pages of old posts. Finding stuff on FB is darned near impossible, with their "search" being woefully inadequate. I copy off to Evernote when I can, though FB has taken the genius step of disabling copy (and paste, for some odd reason) in Android, which means running FB in a mobile browser if I really want to archive something.

      Of course, searching your own (or friends) history isn't the point of FB, but it seems like a pretty big miss if you want people to stay encapsulated in the system for marketing purposes.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Facebook search is horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worth pointing out that the new version of Facebook search is built to address precisely the issue you're mentioning.

      http://search.fb.com has an excellent overview.

    3. Re:Facebook search is horrible by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that the reason for Facebook's poor search is incompetence (although I won't dismiss it out of hand). Doing a decent search through a set of local records isn't rocket science. I would think it might take a programmer a couple of months, and they have thousands of developers and billions of dollars to play with. Instead, my guess is that they make the search perform poorly on purpose, to force you to scroll through pages and pages and thus view more ads.

      Disclaimer: I no longer have an FB account, so I don't really keep on top of these things.

    4. Re:Facebook search is horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even trying to do a very simple thing, like search through all past facebook messages or group posts for a given word, is essentially impossible.

      I dont know where Facebook thinks they are going with their "graph search", but as of today it is absolutely horrible.

      Google is no better, with complete inability to search through Hangouts history without going into GMail of all places. You would think a search company would do better.

      Well, 'graph search' is mostly just a stalking tool after all.

  4. What took them so long? by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 0
    Seriously, is...

    SELECT * FROM posts WHERE uid=123 AND post LIKE %abc%;

    ... that hard to do?

    --
    Buck Feta. You know what to do.
    1. Re:What took them so long? by fbobraga · · Score: 2

      it's not so simple: "Big data"

    2. Re: What took them so long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. Ur hired.

    3. Re:What took them so long? by lucm · · Score: 1

      the LIKE %abc% part makes it a bit difficult on the index, but overall, yeah, I totally agree with the general idea.

      FB is not Google. They don't have to index the entire internet. All they have to do is let people search in the data they've entered in 3-4 different fields. How the fuck can they fail at this.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:What took them so long? by lucm · · Score: 1

      That's not what Big Data means. Big Data is about finding patterns or trends in a large amount of possibly unstructured data. A simple search is a totally different scenario.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  5. Beginning to like Bing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually just switched over to Bing for most of my searching. I don't use Facebook anymore, but suspect their switch to their own in house search engine. Is just another way to data mine what your searching for. Google search is still by far the most popular, although not necessarily the best choice anymore. I think given a news lately in the World going against Google of late. I think some are rethinking Google as a whole. DuckDuckGo is certainly a option for the paranoid of the world.
    But for me, its results are not that spot on many times. Will give Bing a chance to prove itself worthy.

    1. Re:Beginning to like Bing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is microsoft paying you to shill like this?

  6. Bing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They were using Bing? How quaint.

  7. ENOUGH articles about Facebook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO ONE with real intelligence even uses Facebook.

    "Articles" about Facebook _DO NOT BELONG_ on Slashdot.

    You're goddamned right I am yelling, I am sick of these thinly disguised
    advertisements.

    Fuck Dice, Fuck the Jewboy Zuckerberg, and fuck all of you who use Facebook.

    1. Re:ENOUGH articles about Facebook. by lucm · · Score: 1

      Sorry dude but Myspace is not coming back. Let it go.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  8. Bing marketshare by mrflash818 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is my guess that this dropping of Bing by Facebook will erode Bing's search marketshare, which was only ~18%, according to a 2013 article.

    Bing’s market share stayed at 17.9%, the same as it was in June. However, it is worth noting that Bing is up more than 2% from this time last year when they had 15.7% market share.

    http://www.searchenginejournal...

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  9. So totally awesome by JasonGoatcher · · Score: 2

    I love that it's impossible to get Facebook results when searching Google, I don't want to deal with Facebook anyway.

    BEST. ACCIDENTAL GIFT. EVER.

    1. Re:So totally awesome by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Now, if only Google & Bing would drop wikipedia and not make it the #1 result of much of their searches

    2. Re:So totally awesome by lucm · · Score: 1

      I have a -wikipedia suffix in my search macro in FF. Works pretty well.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  10. Facebook searches do NOT show everything by vlueboy · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I have several friends who will post/share things on their wall to "find later." Yeah, there's pretty much no way you're going to find that later unless you manually scroll through pages and pages of old posts. Finding stuff on FB is darned near impossible, with their "search" being woefully inadequate.

    It's worse than you thought. Weeks ago, my mother was looking for a conversation with someone who had passed away. I found that there's some sort of threshold problem snatching older posts (or certain categories of user conversations) out of userland.

    First: I may be in the dark as a non-member, but neither Facebook's GUI and search tools nor my mother as a user have clear ideas of post categories. To find a keyword and look for the proper search option, it was a pain having to grill her just to find if she had posted the conversation on someone else's "wall", vs. her own, vs. under a picture, vs. a private message chain, vs. a Live chat. I even asked if this happened over Yahoo mail. Armed with a rare keyword I found that the search results had irrelevant posts plus one brief part of the conversation... most (or all) of the search results lacked links back to the posts.

    My mother's conversation was from replies to a Status update she made. I think FB makes that data join her wall. River pagination is becoming a thing of the past, to the detriment of users who only have pointers to "now" and "the beginning of time" instead of a clean "x days ago" or "january, february" list option. Since everything happened months ago, scrolling down her wall / river without a filter tool is impractical.

    Second: I tried to beat Facebook's search by rolling my own. I mentioned post categories earlier because FB itself uses them to split up member data in your downloadable account activity data. We downloaded hers. Browser searches through the five or six relevant raw html files did NOT show the keyword there. Various greps over the *entire* folder archive also failed. This happened even though older posts were available than the one Facebooks search tool had confirmed to exist.

    The whole point is that giving you GUI search results of something you can't see in your full activity archive is proof that they selectively snatch data from your halds. We still know Facebook keeps all the data for whatever purposes the advertisers and research^W experiment teams need it. I recall that EU had laws forcing FB to make a physical CD available with the same archive zip data we can get. The discrepancies should be looked into, but FB is a free service anyway. I know shadow profiles get around some of our options, but the data we were looking for was user-initiated.

  11. the graph emperor has no clothes by lucm · · Score: 1

    One of the problems nowadays is that people put too much stock into fancy graph databases. They build apps on top of those because it's easier to persist data from a developer's point of view (no data model, no need for an ORM, no need to learn sql), but then things like search become almost impossible to do without complex and unreliable algorithms.

    There's no magic. Searching requires a decent data model and a reliable indexing/partioning scheme. Young developers should stop jerking off with Big O notations and just apply common sense.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  12. Speaking of searching old posts... by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    Does Slashdot offer the ability to search out and read a user's posts going back to this site's inception?

  13. Now to take it out of Thunderbird by Animats · · Score: 1

    In a particularly lame move, somebody put Bing search into Thunderbird. When searching your emails, you can also get irrelevant web search results via Bing. What the use case is for that I have no idea.

  14. Facebook has search? by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Facebook has search? Wait... is that for searching your posts for info, or is it like a Google search engine?