Slashdot Mirror


Review: The BlackBerry Classic Is One of the Best Phones of 2009

Molly McHugh writes When Apple launched the iPhone in 2007, and I owned a BlackBerry Curve. To me, my BlackBerry was close to being the absolute perfect smartphone. Today, BlackBerry revealed the Classic, a phone that is designed to make me—and everyone who owned a BlackBerry before the touchscreen revolution—remember how much we loved them.

132 comments

  1. Re:Snowden found dead in Moscow loft by bhcompy · · Score: 0

    Hanged or hung?

  2. Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Right? by Emmi59 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    See subject

  3. but of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the Curve and friends blow 7 shades of crap outta anything apple have ever offered or are ever likely to offer

    Not Anonymous Coward just waiting for the moderators to do 12 months cold turkey they may JUST about be sane then

  4. Re:Snowden found dead in Moscow loft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. Crackberry is Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about anyone else, but unless I can run my iOS stuff on a new smartphone, I'll pass.

    Blackberry utterly failed to stay relevant, and now it's trying to pull an Apple and make a comeback by offering something that is about as powerful as a low-end Android device, and doesn't run any Android software either. I'm not sure what exactly Blackberry is trying to accomplish here. Appeal to those that like the itty bitty buttons?

    1. Re: Crackberry is Back by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Blackberry phones nowadays can run essentially any Android app flawlessly...

    2. Re: Crackberry is Back by sithlord2 · · Score: 2

      Yes, and OS/2 could run almost all Windows 3.1 and DOS applications too.

      That strategy didn't work for them in the long run either...

      --
      ...You are over-qualified and under-paid. If we give you a raise, we will break the cosmic balance of the universe.
    3. Re:Crackberry is Back by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Why do you care? I have a z10 and it is the best choice for what I want to do with it. But why would you care about that?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re: Crackberry is Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True, but that was for fairly different reasons.

      Microsoft could (and very quickly did) evolve windows in a way OS/2 couldn't retain any sort of compatibility with, and the underlying OS/2 system was not easy to develop for (no matter what REXX nerds tell you).

      Android, by contrast, is open source, and they are not relying on Google's version (and the attendant Play issues) but Amazon's fork and app store. They have a deal with Amazon.

      They still have to get native development done, but QNX is a much nicer thing to develop for, and the rewards (performance, battery life, memory use) are more obvious.

      You're right that it's an uphill struggle for sure, but they aren't trying to retain compatibility with a hostile entity. This might be enough while they reboot their enterprise offerings.

    5. Re: Crackberry is Back by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      I am not saying anything about their strategy, just refuting the incorrectness of the GP.

    6. Re: Crackberry is Back by DrXym · · Score: 2
      It's largely a matter of indifference to a handset's performance what kernel is running under a phone handset. Providing the kernel offers functionality required by handsets it could be NT, Linux, BSD or something else. It's the user land and application sitting on top which dictates the user experience and what hardware / battery the device which dictates that. I assume that Blackberry pack a big battery, the smaller screen and some aggressive power saving defaults could extend the life of the device.

      It should also be self evident that if a Blackberry device has to load up a substantial chunk of an Android runtime and an emulation layer (in addition to its own services) to run an Android app that it will be neither as performant or memory efficient as a standard Android device. It has two stacks to wrangle and there might be limits on the Android emulation that cause performance issues of its own.

      In fact it's hard to see why they bother emulating Android at all when they could just *be* Android. Doesn't stopping them locking it down with Knox, encrypted storage etc. It would save them a hell of a lot of effort in the long run and would broaden the appeal of a device if it actually ran the apps people wanted to use. Emulation and Amazon's store is better than nothing but it's still an extremely poor substitute for the Play store.

    7. Re:Crackberry is Back by hey! · · Score: 1

      Trapped in a walled garden, are we?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Crackberry is Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand your "trying to pull an Apple...by offering something that is about as powerful as a low-end Android device" when basically every current Android device is slightly more performant than last year's iPhone.

      But you've also shown yourself to be clueless in the rest of your post too, so I guess you're just clueless.

    9. Re: Crackberry is Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      self evident that if a Blackberry device has to load up a substantial chunk of an Android runtime and an emulation layer (in addition to its own services) to run an Android app that it will be neither as performant or memory efficient as a standard Android device.

      It's not self-evident. There are serious jank problems while scrolling, 10-second latency problems navigating trivial apps like Settings, and nagging battery-drain problems with Android. These are the main problems the platform has.

      Memory use isn't one of the problems: the standard phone went from 0.5GByte to 2GByte RAM a couple years ago without any significant change in app functionality, and the K release used less memory than the J release so general platform bloat is actually going backwards: the stack's memory tax is therefore less than a quarter of the standard platform size and not a big deal for emulation.

      Performance probably isn't a problem wrt the emulation because the performance problems are not flat-out CPU bound work nor mean-latency problems: doubling the mean latency would not be a big deal because android has such huge tail-latency problems. And doubling mean latency in return for cutting max latency is exactly what hard-realtime kernels like Neutrino are made for. Whether they can do this through the android stack is doubtful because the latency is probably coming from java crappo, but who knows. Anyway it's not self-evident that emulation will cause a memory problem for Android, nor that it will cause a performance/battery problem.

      Emulation and battery-drain problems aren't related because they're caused by poor scheduling, bugs, held "wake locks", etc. Part of the area where bugs can exist will be replaced, so if QNX is higher-quality than Android in this replaced area it will win the battery game.

    10. Re: Crackberry is Back by DrXym · · Score: 1

      It's not self-evident. There are serious jank problems while scrolling, 10-second latency problems navigating trivial apps like Settings, and nagging battery-drain problems with Android. These are the main problems the platform has.

      Utter bollocks. And even if it were true (and it isn't) it does not mean the kernel is to blame so your point would still be bollocks.

      Memory use isn't one of the problems: the standard phone went from 0.5GByte to 2GByte RAM a couple years ago without any significant change in app functionality, and the K release used less memory than the J release so general platform bloat is actually going backwards: the stack's memory tax is therefore less than a quarter of the standard platform size and not a big deal for emulation.

      Utter bollocks again. Android has increased memory generally so more apps stay resident in memory. The less memory, the more likely it would be to purge apps. In other words it makes use of the memory for stuff.

      Performance probably isn't a problem wrt the emulation because the performance problems are not flat-out CPU bound work nor mean-latency problems: doubling the mean latency would not be a big deal because android has such huge tail-latency problems. And doubling mean latency in return for cutting max latency is exactly what hard-realtime kernels like Neutrino are made for. Whether they can do this through the android stack is doubtful because the latency is probably coming from java crappo, but who knows. Anyway it's not self-evident that emulation will cause a memory problem for Android, nor that it will cause a performance/battery problem.

      Utter bollocks because it presupposes your other bollocks and makes no sense in any event. The point I was making was that to emulate Android, a Black Berry device has the memory pressure of two runtimes in memory at once (the native one) and the emulated one (plus shims). It obviously impacts on memory and performance.

      Emulation and battery-drain problems aren't related because they're caused by poor scheduling, bugs, held "wake locks", etc. Part of the area where bugs can exist will be replaced, so if QNX is higher-quality than Android in this replaced area it will win the battery game.

      It's true that a misbehaved app can drain battery but normal drain is caused by the screen, radio and general activity. And in any event it's largely an irrelevance what kernel is underneath because an app can misbehave over any kernel. And modern kernels are wasting CPU / battery unless something above is telling them to.

    11. Re: Crackberry is Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true dumb ass crackberry piece of shit worm.

    12. Re: Crackberry is Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't ypu heard ? Samsung has given up on Knox and partnered with Blackberry.

      http://press.blackberry.com/press/2014/blackberry-and-samsung-partner-to-provide-end-to-end-security-fo.html

    13. Re: Crackberry is Back by DrXym · · Score: 1

      That press release demonstrates they've done anything but given up. It sounds instead like Blackberry want's to diversify away from its own hardware and ensure its middleware runs over more platforms such as KNOX.

  6. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Informative

    that's the point of TFA. This thing would've been great in 2009. Now it's just serving a niche market of shrinking ex-crackberry users. Still, if it prevents RIM from disappearing from the face of the earth, that might count as a success.

  7. What a gap... by Jimpqfly · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm looking forward getting the next Nokia 3310!

    1. Re:What a gap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... my handspring treo 600...

    2. Re:What a gap... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Joke all you want, but my N900 is still going strong and I have yet to see anything decent to replace it. Even the supposed pretenders claiming to supercede it refuse to build its "successors" with an equivelent fantastic hardware keyboard.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    3. Re:What a gap... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Myself and my wife switched to the N900 in 2010 - we both ended up hating it, I switched back to my iPhone 3G within 3 months, while my wife stuck it out until she could renew the contract, by which time the keyboards on both our phones were dead (she had to switch to my phone after 9 months due to the fact her keyboard had lost all coating on the keys and several keys had stopped working).

      The screen was terrible, the OS was bad, the keyboard was horrific.

      Why do people love the N900 so much?

    4. Re:What a gap... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Guess I was "lucky"? I bought mine 2009, paid full price for a no contract one and as I stated above, it is working just fine! Oh sure there are a few scratches on the screen a couple of the keys but it still just does what it was designed to do. It really makes it easy to hang on to the better part of a thousand waiting for something decent to come along replace it.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    5. Re:What a gap... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm just as mystified as to why you hate it and how you killed the keyboard. I suppose different people use them in different ways and I still haven't seen anything I would swap my N900 for yet, but since I do use the thing as an ssh terminal from time to time I don't think anyone thinks there's enough people that use it like me to make a new product.

    6. Re:What a gap... by short · · Score: 1

      Because N900 is the only phone out there running Linux OS - not just the Linux kernel like Android but the full userland (mostly GNU), incl. bash, glibc etc.

    7. Re:What a gap... by short · · Score: 2

      For N900 replacement look for Jolla+TOHKBD.

    8. Re:What a gap... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Checked both NewEgg and Amazon, no luck. I'll be keeping on eye out on both though because I'm really interested. I love my N900 I'm realistic enough to know that it won't live forever.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    9. Re:What a gap... by short · · Score: 1

      You can order Jolla from its website, there are usually some EUR100 discount coupons around. For TOHKBD you can contact its author. Unfortunately given the low-end hardware it has it is all a bit pricy compared to Android phones from Asia.

    10. Re:What a gap... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      I paid well over $500 for my N900 so not that worried about price. As for site of purchase, no. It would have to be from a well known reseller who has a strong reputation for backing the merchandise they sell.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    11. Re:What a gap... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Because they bought into the mystique of a niche product, and therefore nothing else can match up.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    12. Re:What a gap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neo900 is the logical successor to N900. Same case, same OS (If you want), just newer faster hardware.

  8. Crackberry is Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually BB10 is able to run most Android Apps perfectly fine, I am using a Z10 and have very little issues with Android applications.

  9. RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Chas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously. This kinds of shit is why they pissed away their market lead and utterly destroyed their entire market share.

    They keep going for a minute market segment that barely exists, and thinks that the rest of us will hop on board to be with "the cool kids".

    What they don't understand is that they've drawn themselves a venn diagram and aimed for the absolute smallest piece of the pie.

    Yes, it doesn't require the kind of investment that aiming for a larger market segment does.

    But, if you miss with that segment, you crash and burn.

    And worse, they aren't even doing the research to even verify the market segment they're aiming for:

    A) Can handle the entrance of the device.
    B) Exists in the first palce

    RIM has been dogfooding so long that they're institutionally blind.

    I had a buddy at RIM try to tell me their tablet device was going to rock the market. Couldn't understand why I laughed and laughed and fell on the floor and laughed some more when he told me I basically had to buy into RIM's entire hardware ecosystem to take advantage of the thing. That it wasn't available as a stand-alone device.

    Not sure that he still works there. Hopefully the high-decibel flushing sound that's been going on at RIM for the last decade or so will have infused him with a little perspective. Even if his bosses are still acid-tripping on ground up Blackberry 10 phones.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      RIM has been dogfooding so long that they're institutionally blind.

      That "word" needs to die a quick and painful death... If you want to use that saying as a verb, just write "have been eating their own dog food".

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Chas · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I have to work around sales-schmucks all day long.

      Contamination...

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    3. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They keep going for a minute market segment that barely exists

      I beg to differ. The moment I realize that

      1. Blackberry is coming out with a touchscreen phone with QWERTY keypad AND
      2. Fully compatible with Android apps.

      I called up my wife that happens to be in Singapore (one of the launch countries) to grab me one. I for one, do not enjoy touch screen typing. Not that I've not tried. But after 2 years, and I still can't type 5 words straight without mistake.. I think I've had it. Typing on touch screen keypad takes such intense concentration it is hazardous to do when you are moving about. I've seen 3 cases where people got robbed, while they were so focused on typing on their touch screen phones. Or nearly got ran over while crossing the road.

      With my last QWERTY phone, Sony P1, I can literally touch type while walking, with single hand. Only to check at the end of the mesg with almost NO mistakes. I can dial without looking, just by feel. Scroll wheel is one feature I miss the most from yesterday's phones. The Sony P1 (blackberry clone) is ancient by today's standard... but it does things just SO MUCH faster by having buttons that ***gets to the point**

      There is a group of users, that is heavy on e-mail usage, that don't need full touchscreen, appreciate a partial touch screen, loves the Android apps, but do miss the QWERTY keyboard like mad. I've been waiting for any company to launch an Android phone with QWERTY keypad., that don't suck . But I guess the Blackberry Classic is as close as I can get to that.

      Gary

    4. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      RIM has been dogfooding so long that they're institutionally blind.

      That "word" needs to die a quick and painful death... If you want to use that saying as a verb, just write "have been eating their own dog food".

      It's a stupid fucking phrase in the first place. How can anyone find the idea of eating dog food a good metaphor?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

      they are all uwaterloo people living in the kitchener/waterloo area. To say they are a minute insular community is an understatement. Its no surprise they are fasttracking their way to being the next Watcom.

    6. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's a perfect metaphor when you're working for a company which produces crappy products and forces you to use them in front of customers.

      Sales demos become the customer watching you eat dogfood.

      I never regret quitting that place.

    7. Re: RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because BBRY will sue the shit out of anyone that does.

      *they* own that dinosaur technology, and they won't let anyone forget it.

    8. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a stupid fucking phrase in the first place. How can anyone find the idea of eating dog food a good metaphor?

      Well, have you ever tried it? Shut up, then.

    9. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They keep going for a minute market segment that barely exists, and thinks that the rest of us will hop on board to be with "the cool kids".

      Us cool kids like Blackberry's killer features:

      1. Doesn't steal all your data and send it to Apple.
      2. Doesn't steal all your data and send it to Google.
      3. Doesn't allow every app to steal all your data.

      Unfortunately, there's only about 10 of us who feel that way.

      You might have thought that with Apple's large scale celebrity nude photo leaks (known as the The Fappening
      http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_celebrity_photo_leaks&redirect=no ) people would start caring about smartphone security, but sadly, no.

    10. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep reading everywhere that BB is cornering itself into a small segment with their decisions, what may very well be true by market share stats, but I have never seen a single god-damn comment on what it should do instead of what it shouldn't, what it needs to make their products interesting for the masses (or even just for the single commenter) and not what it doesn't.

      What features should it support? What should be the hardware? What is the OS missing? In which areas should they innovate and get ahead of the current and upcoming top of the line products?
      Give me a proper list of things BlackBerry needs to succeed with their products, until then I can not, and will not take such bashing comments seriously.

    11. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Judging by sales, that group is pretty damned small and it is very questionable that it is large enough to keep the company afloat.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Remember when RIM opened up its network so the Saudi and Indian governments could spy on BB users....

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a poor salesman that blames his tools.

    14. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would if I lived in Saudi Arabia. Since I don't live there, or in India, no, I don't.

    15. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackberry, Android, Apple.... is doesn't matter. You carry one of these tracking devices around with you everywhere, then you're an idiot.

    16. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks genius, I'm sure none of this occurred to BB.

      All they can hope for now is to keep their loyal base, which is not insignificant. This effectively means offering the best of the old with some new features. You're forgetting that they've already made an attempt to attract touchscreen users with the Z10 and nobody cared, along with running Android apps. Business phones don't market themselves as hip.

      The joke thrown around is that BB is stuck in the past but this seems disingenuous. There aren't strikingly high differences between the latest and its competitors, and you can't very well argue that the Android and iOS phones have evolved considerably more -- they've been pumping out the same thing for years with incrementally better hardware. Certainly a reliable keyboard is an asset to those who spend 90% of the time typing, and not legacy hardware thrown into obsolescence because oh look how much crap I can fit into a screen.

    17. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Continue to live in your magical world where there exists a large population demographic that is just waiting desperately to make some amazingly intelligent company rich beyond their wildest dreams when they release the perfect smartphone with a physical keyboard.

      This story has been told by by your kin for years now such that if it's tale were true I'd expect there to be a plethora of such devices on the market. Tablets seem to do amazingly well without a physical keyboard built in and the release of the surface which highlighted a keyboard didn't go anywhere.

      BlackBerry did well for many years because they were the first to break into the new ground of smartphones and they became business devices. Truth be told, if the "Classic" had been released in 2009 it may have helped BlackBerry but not for the reason you state. I suspect that less large companies would have fled to other devices and chose to continue to stick it out with BB, forcing their devices on employees. Having had a corporate issues BlackBerry for years, the situations where I stated "thank goodness I have this BB with the keyboard" were far overshadowed by the number of situations where I stated "I wish I just had an android/apple device" or "I'll just pop out my laptop".

    18. Re:RIM still off in their own little la-la land. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astroturfer!!

  10. April 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to check.

  11. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by gweihir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, it is still great if you want to use it as a tool and not a toy.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  12. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This thing wouldn't have been great in 1999, let alone 2009.

    By 2009, the iPhone was already here, hardware keyboards were a dead technology, and WhackBerry was still building garbage without touchscreens.

    They had one chance to survive - drop their OS, dump their useless hardware keyboards, and start building Android phones. They didn't do it. They're gone, just like M$. How many Windoze phones do you see out there? I've never seen one in person, ever. I see lots of iPhones, lots of Android phones, but no Windoze phones, and I haven't seen a WhackBerry in years, the last one I had the displeasure of touching was replaced with an iPhone three years ago.

    Stick a fork in them, they're done.

  13. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by igloo-x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Windows and BlackBerry aren't very good, so I say Windoze and WhackBerry instead" Do you see how much of a fuckwit this makes you look?

  14. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some people prefer hardware keyboards. I'm not one of them; I prefer to have a slimmer device with a larger screen instead, but I've tried one of the old BB models (one with a trackball) and found that its keyboard was rather good for typing longer messages. I can see the attraction if most of what you do is email and messaging.

    What a lot of people (myself included) didn't appreciate is how much people hate having to carry two devices. Where I work, many people had a BB provided by the company as well as a personal cell phone (smart or otherwise). As soon as the company offered corporate email and calendar on personal smartphones, pretty much everyone dropped BB and continued to use their personal device. And pretty much no one choose BB as their personal device either. TFA praises BB for not trying to appeal to the mass market with this device, and instead offer something that does a couple of things really well, but BB need to understand that in the world of bring-your-own-device, the reality is that your device needs to service personal needs as well as business needs. Having a physical keyboard and a great messaging app clearly doesn't cut it anymore.

    Adding the ability to run Android apps on modern BB phones is a great move though. That may be exactly what is needed to make them good enough for personal use.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  15. I like having two phones by climb_no_fear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I hate the Blackberry, some of us actually prefer to have 2 phones: I can shut off the company phone when on vacation or "forget" to charge it, etc.

    1. Re:I like having two phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coughcough Well done on knowing how to operate a cell phone (or two!) ;) ;)

    2. Re:I like having two phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switch it off except for the 9-17 on 5 days of the week. That's what I do. If you can't do that, you'd better be getting something extra for being "on call".

  16. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, it is still great if you want to use it as a tool and not a toy.

    Just keep those blinders on, son. Just keep telling yourself what other people use their iPhones and Android phones for isn't to get stuff done - it's not like they're doing WORK the way you are! Don't ask yourself how all those people who switched away from Blackberry could possibly not see how they're no longer getting anything done with those lesser phones...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  17. A matter of love by aglider · · Score: 1, Funny

    When Apple launched the iPhone in 2007, and I owned a BlackBerry Curve.

    You don't love the grammar very much. Do you?

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:A matter of love by VorpalRodent · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's just different grammar than you're used to.

      Apple and Blackberry at Tanagra. Darmok and Jalad, their cellphones wide.

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
  18. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by Zeromous · · Score: 5, Funny

    Typing on a touch screen is still shitty 5 years later. Case in point i just had to make 3 corrections to the previous sentenc.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  19. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by theVarangian · · Score: 1

    that's the point of TFA. This thing would've been great in 2009. Now it's just serving a niche market of shrinking ex-crackberry users. Still, if it prevents RIM from disappearing from the face of the earth, that might count as a success.

    The old style Blackberries weren't even very good back in their heyday. I got a Black Berry Curve 8320 in late 2007 and used it for about two years. The phones themselves, i.e. the hardware, was OK, I especially liked the Black Berry keyboard and the little trackball. However, I also concluded that the software and OS sucked ass big time if you wanted to use the Curve as a smart phone to surf the net or use apps to make your life simpler like we do with modern smartphones. And that is precisely what I have been buying large screen smartphones for since the early 2000s, to use apps. Even so I can see how the Curve was the perfect device for SMS and e-mail junkies since those were just about the only two things the Black Berry Curve series did really, really well. So I switched to iPhones the instant I could get my greasy paws on one back in 2009 and never looked back except to contemplate switching to Android a couple of times.

  20. Where is the review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or what am I missing? This seems more like a shallow opinion piece, not a review.

  21. Love the hardware, want a different OS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to see this thing running Android or even Maemo (or a Maemo derivative). The hardware looks really nice--and those of us who want physical keyboards have been neglected. I use a Galaxy S4 now, but I still don't love the typing as much as I did on my old N900. I'd be willing to cough up financial support, my time helping, and whatever else I could to see this run another OS.

  22. Re:Snowden found dead in Moscow loft by tehcyder · · Score: 2

    Humans are hanged, horses are hung.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  23. Re:Snowden found dead in Moscow loft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some of us humans are hung too, just sayin

  24. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by SmilingBoy · · Score: 0

    Try swiping on a keyboard like Swype (or the built-in Android keyboard since 4.3). Swiping one word at a time is faster than typing on a hardware keyboard.

  25. Nobody but suits wanted a Blackberry after 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's face it, the only reason Blackberry ever got anywhere in the first place was their proprietary Exchange integration and the fact they were able to sell the suits that installing a "Blackberry server" next to your Exchange was a good idea and a sign of two "great" products. There were enough attempts at making a smartphone before the iPhone came out and e.g. Nokia actually had all the crucial ingredients but then decided they should focus on old-school cellphone and invent 200 different shapes and form factors instead.
    Once the iPhone had come out absolutely nobody but suits who wanted to look important "absolutely wanted" a Blackberry and its end had officially begun. Not too long after it was just suits and curiously enough drug dealer who were using Blackberries, because shops were shelling BBs out for very cheap.

    So I have no idea what this guy is going on about that Blackberry was the bestest thing ever. They never were. Their only, absolutely only selling point was the serious-business Exchange integration. This hasn't changed to this very day and android and ios are getting better at doing that while win-phone is still desperately trying to get sold. Winphone has a better chance of "making it" than blackberry ever had or will ever have. This new phone the review is talking about is the perfect proof.

    r.i.p. blackberry and let's rejoice we won't have to maintain that crappy blackberry server junk anymore.

    1. Re:Nobody but suits wanted a Blackberry after 2007 by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      The minute Microsoft made Activesync sufficiently robust, BB's cause célèbre evaporated.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  26. BlackBerry was CRAP!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was forced to carry one...I hated the thing with a passion the interface and functionality was terrible. I was so glad when the iPhone because available to me after the 2 year BB contract expired. Best day of my life.

  27. Re:Snowden found dead in Moscow loft by Megol · · Score: 1

    Those humans are referred to as horses so parent is still right.

  28. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by gunner_von_diamond · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's much faster for longer words. But for all of the shorter words with 3 letters, it's almost impossible to get them right every time.

  29. Re: Snowden found dead in Moscow loft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a referring to a hung human as a horse, its proper form to call them a stalion.

  30. Hardware keyboards not the issue with Blackberry by maple_shaft · · Score: 2

    I used to be a Blackberry fan back in the day when it was ahead of the curve. It wasn't until a year and half ago that I tried an Android phone for the first time and I was shocked at how much better quality I have. There simply is no other way to describe how BlackBerry fails on every mark in the current day.

    The OS crashed frequently. The app store had a terrible selection and the apps that existed were poor quality and buggy. The browser was slow and difficult to use. The speaker was awful quality whether I was on the phone or playing music, and it got even worse when I connected my headphone jack or auxilliary cable into my car's stereo. The sound quality was easily 4x improved on my Android. Voice command? Laughably bad. I couldn't even get it to recognize the word "Call".

    The only thing I miss about it is the physical keyboard which I do type faster on, however that is just simply not enough to keep their dwindling customer base. They didn't keep up and now they are essentially dead. Just like with the Republican party, I will never go back again as long as I live.

  31. But, that's the point! by RandomActOfKindness · · Score: 1

    > The BlackBerry Classic Is One of the Best Phones of 2009

    What most of the internet seems to have missed is that BlackBerry intended the new Classic to be "one of the best phones of 2009".

    What is also missed is that, that's okay. There are people out there who don't want an iPhone or Samsung, they want a new&improved Bold 9900. Maybe that's not you: fine. But maybe it is, and that's fine too.

  32. Re:Hardware keyboards not the issue with Blackberr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...says the person still comparing to the phone from years ago. The new BlackBerry phones are a huge improvement all across the board. But don't let that stop your history-laden tirade.

  33. Re:Hardware keyboards not the issue with Blackberr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's hope the Republican Party does not go back to using BB's (or did they ever stop using them?)!

  34. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

    Its good enough that Im willing to look past it to avoid all of the other massive issues Blackberry has, like its inability to interact meaningfully with the world outside of its corporate network.

  35. Re:Hardware keyboards not the issue with Blackberr by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

    They made vast improvements in a year and a half? Forgive me if I am highly skeptical of your AC commentary.

  36. OK, we get it...its the keyboard by zerofoo · · Score: 2

    Anyone that wants a physical keyboard can have one. There are TONS of phone cases with bluetooth keyboards. I don't know of a single modern smartphone that doesn't support them.

    But hey, there are dozens of Blackberry fans that will love this product.....so it's got that going for it.

  37. Re:Hardware keyboards not the issue with Blackberr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even the same phones, or OS. But don't bother checking that out for yourself; just stick with your outdated view.

  38. Rimberry's only advantage was security.. by RealGene · · Score: 1

    Post-Snowden, they would have been perfectly placed to argue that theirs was the only secure communicator available to the public.
    But then they rolled over for India, of all places, trading backdoors for market share.
    The security niche might have given them the breathing space to hold on, but when that was gone, it removed the only cogent argument for corporations to not buy iPhones instead.

    --
    Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
    1. Re:Rimberry's only advantage was security.. by acoustix · · Score: 1

      But then they rolled over for India, of all places, trading backdoors for market share.

      Citation needed.

      Just because you heard it somewhere doesn't mean it's true. There are no backdoors for the BES system. The customer generates their own keys. BlackBerry doesn't have access to them.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  39. Meanwhile, In News from The Bygone Era Channel... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    The BlackBerry Classic Is One of the Best Phones of 2009

    Meanwhile, the wheel has been nominated as the best invention of the 5th millennium BC.

    Brought to you by... Captain Obvious!

  40. but what about the s/w? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope the classic goes back to the Bold s/w, where I could set up the notification so drunks didn't wake me, or telemarketers-vendors calling while I sleep off an overnight maintenance upgrade. I got the Q10 after my Bold quit charging batts correctly. The Q10 just sux. Notifications are binary, either on or off. No customization like I did with the Bold. Only thing I like about the Q10 is the pinch/squeeze zoom.

    I wouldn't post as anon coward, but I forgot my user/pswd for Slashdot when I changed jobs last year. Shouldn't let the pc remember those things without writing them done somewhere, you know, Somewhere I can't remember either.

  41. Re:Hardware keyboards not the issue with Blackberr by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Android phone makers experimented with physical keyboards for a while, and lately seem to have decided to just issue the same bland iPhone-but-with-Android form factors and forget about being innovative in that area.

    I hope BlackBerry stays relevent enough to undo that and get manufacturers looking at text input again. The current situation may suit many, but I see a 50/50 split between people who are happy with Swype-like text input, and people who really prefer the accuracy of physical push buttons. Me, I'm generally OK with the former, but want to have the latter to fall back on.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  42. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I haven't found this to be true. I've tried swiftkey and swype for weeks at a time, and I've found that they're generally slower than me tapping words out. The problem is that the worst case--that the system gets the word wrong and you need to replace the whole thing because none of the suggestions are correct--comes up surprisingly often for me. I also find the flow of tapping to be a lot more comfortable. I never stop tapping until I'm finished, while with the swiping methods, I have to pause in between words before I start swiping again.

    Mileage varies, but I'm considerably faster with the built-in Apple keyboard unless I'm walking and typing with one hand. In that case, the swiping method has an obvious payoff because I can be less accurate with my movements.

  43. Not a review! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This person just wrote about the release of the phone, and retold the history of the company. The author does not appear to have even touched the phone, so this person is not qualified to say this is a good phone or not, and this is certainly not a "review". You can find an actual hands-on article at Phone Scoop, and full reviews at Mobile Syrup and PCMag.

  44. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

    I usually swipe my whole email first and then correct all incorrect words afterwards so not to interrupt the flow.

  45. Re:Snowden found dead in Moscow loft by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    Yeah not necessarily relevant to the masses anymore but Blackberry and Win phone's piece of a very big market is still a nice profitable company. Last I saw Win Phone had something like 2.5% market share which would be the equivalent of Nissan or Hyundai in the car space: small companies but they don't just give up because there is still a lot of money to be made especially since Blackberry and Microsoft make the devices too so they make money on both ends.

  46. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the most part anytime I see someone talk about a technology being a "toy" I know they're easily ignored. There's nothing you can do on your platform that I can't do on mine.

  47. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by operagost · · Score: 1

    Not so great if you want it to actually ring when a call comes in. On the Bold, I found that I have to use the ringer that sounds like an office phone ringer. If I use any others, it plays the short sound once (and they are all only a second or two in length) and I tend to miss the call. Also, I want the Favorites group open every time. Isn't that reasonable? I mean, they're my favorites. But it always mysteriously moves to Frequent or All, so that I have to swipe to find what I want. Most of the tiny icons don't look like what they represent, or two or three look almost the same.

    It's crap, and I can't wait until my company replaces it with an iPhone.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  48. This phone design was driven by businesses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Per John Chen:

    Blackberry went to customers and asked what they wanted. They wanted the "belt" and a keyboard. Crazy huh. BBRY did market research and determined that their customers wanted the Blackberry Classic.

    Also, if you are a consumer then Blackberry is not targeting you. So if you don't like it, Blackberry really doesn't care. They are targeting business users.

    I personally don't want the Classic but I am a consumer. But the Blackberry Passport is damned tempting.

    1. Re: This phone design was driven by businesses. by snowsnoot · · Score: 1

      I'm a business user. I'm also a consumer. Oh look.. Android kills both birds with one phone! BBRY.. FAIL.

  49. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because BlackBerry phones are a good tool doesn't discount other phones from being good tools as well. If there's room in the power tool market for Makita, DeWalt and Milwaukee, there's room for BlackBerry in the cellphone as a tool market as well.

    However, BlackBerry specifically focuses on productivity, and for some, that's important. And for others, they're happy if their choice of cellphone has the designer focusing on play and productivity.

  50. passport anyone? Re: la-la land. by Fubari · · Score: 1

    ...but do miss the QWERTY keyboard like mad. I've been waiting for any company to launch an Android phone with QWERTY keypad., that don't suck . But I guess the Blackberry Classic is as close as I can get to that.

    Gary

    I'm comfortably easing into using my passport. Currently on day #3, so far so good.
    The passport's keyboard is very well done, they have put a lot of thought into the user interface and hardware: here is an interesting video of the keyboard in action. Limiting the physical keys to just 3 rows of letters actually works really well with the virtual rows that can pop up on screen.
    I'm sure I will find some things about the passport that I dislike, I just haven't found any thus far.

  51. Re:Hardware keyboards not the issue with Blackberr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >They made vast improvements in a year and a half?

    They replaced the entire operating system ( http://www.wikiwand.com/en/BlackBerry_10 ), rebuilt from the ground up, with a Unix-alike ( http://www.wikiwand.com/en/QNX ). The new phones don't run java ( http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/Java-Development/Can-I-use-Java-to-develope-application-on-BB10/td-p/1710085 ), which means not a single app the old phones ran runs on the new phones (of course, new versions written for the new operating system are there instead). They run android applications ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwNkz04KclM ). And they offer the Amazon Appstore built in on the latest phones ( http://blogs.blackberry.com/2014/09/check-it-out-blackberry-passport-rocks-leading-apps-via-the-amazon-appstore-on-bb-os-10-3/ ). The browser has been hailed by many testing suites as the fastest mobile browser on earth ( http://www.phonearena.com/news/BlackBerry-browser-is-the-fastest-beats-out-Opera-Mini-in-average-page-load-time_id52269 ). The speaker is also hailed as being 350% louder than popular android phones ( http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/blackberry-launches-passport-phone-blend-app-1.2775674 ). Blackberry assistant, while slow, beats out google now hands down and, if you're willing to wait, equals Siri ( http://n4bb.com/voice-command-battle-blackberry-assistant-vs-siri-vs-google-now-video/ ).

    As far as your aux cable goes, buy a new one. I bet it's not grounded, or you're using a craptastic charger. I've used BB phones for almost a decade and never experienced bad sound because it's plugged into my car.

  52. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been considering switching back. The Q10 can run android apps and has a high enough res screen for me. Plus it's touch and has a great web browser, the phone is plenty snappy. It does everything I need: e-mail, web browser, run a couple apps I'd use. And it has a keyboard I can actually type on.

    Some people are so blindly convinced that EVERYONE needs 6" multitouch octa core phones that there's no convincing them otherwise.

  53. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Go pump BB's stock somewhere else.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  54. I told you so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is another I told you so to all the people that laughed when I said the iPhone (And then later android) will displace blackberry. The day iOS got native activesync was the day Blackberry died.

    There is not another soul on this planet that experiences more schadenfreude than I at BB's continued downward death spiral.

  55. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Ri by snowsnoot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used a corporate issued BB with hard keys for years. While I agree the error rate is higher on the soft keys, I was most surprised how my thumbs no longer hurt. Also the advantage of being able to use the full screen outweighs the error rate problem. Also I don't buy into BB claims of security. This is complete nonsense as all lawful intercept occurs on the inside of the firewalls in BlackBerry's network. And these days with BB10 they use SSL routed over the public imternet instead of IPSec tunnels routed over dedicated circuits. MEH.

  56. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by phorm · · Score: 1

    The typing I miss, but I can live with a touchscreen. What I really want back from the old days is the battery life that earlier BB's etc used to have.

  57. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by tepples · · Score: 2

    Even if you make a second proofreading pass on an article typed on a touch screen, placing the insertion point near a particular word to correct it is a pain too. Or do I just have overly fat fingers?

  58. Hardware keyboards on gaming devices by tepples · · Score: 1

    If hardware keyboards are such "a dead technology", why do PlayStation Vita and Nintendo 3DS still have hardware directional pads, analog sticks, and buttons, as opposed to relying on multitouch with zero tactile feedback the way the iPhone and Android devices do? For game genres using directional as opposed to positional input, even the widely panned Turbo Touch 360 gamepad is better than a flat sheet of glass. So there's at least one niche of applications best served by a specialized input device that helps the user align his fingers without looking at them. BlackBerry fans believe that e-mail is another.

  59. The same argument applies to iphone, really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iphone was the best phone of 2007. It hasn't changed much since then. Meanwhile, the Note from Samsung, and the Passport from BlackBerry are the only new things since then. Apple copied the Note, but won't be able to copy the Passport because of well-tested keyboard patents. The fact that the Classic/Bold form factor is still in demand is evidence that these devices, beyond fashion, are about use cases. Some people want the touch candy bar. Some people want the bigger phablet. Some people want the smaller keyboard. Some people want the bigger keyboard.

    Most people got tired of the app market years ago, after they realized that they gave Apple a couple hundred bucks just to get functionality that other operating systems, like BB10, support better-integrated right out of the box. For example, the facebook integration handles all of the real notifications, and can show the basic news feed if needed, and no silly ads that get in the way, because blackberry developed the integration properly to get what is needed. I just bought a Passport, the only BlackBerry I have personally used. I did some development for work on other devices from BlackBerry and was always impressed with the software, and just needed the Passport form factor, finally buying when it became available. It is literally a pocketable laptop.

  60. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

    It's sad, but BB is doing a lot of things to make up for its lost years.

    BES 10 didn't support older BB 5,7 devices. That was one of hte biggest blunders. They are fixing that now in BES12.

    Back in 2009, there was nothing really wrong with BB phones per se. They just needed a new OS with better app/dev support. you can't go back in time and there were issues with adopting Android, but that is basically what they are doing now with Android app support...

    Yes, years late, but a lot of enterprises still have BB7 devices and the old BES. This is their upgrade path that should have been there in 2009.

    It is probably their best play as far as plays goes.
    Continued and enhanced android support will basically let them make a corporate/secure/managed version of android.

    Consumers could latch onto it as well if they like the keyboard and build/branding.

  61. OK, we get it...its the keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you actually tried it, though? It doesn't work because:
    1. The keyboards suck, because blackberry owns the patents that cover the good designs.
    2. The battery life sucks when using bluetooth, rarely lasting the whole day.

  62. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by celle · · Score: 1

    " Case in point i just had to make 3 corrections to the previous sentenc."

    four.

  63. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by JPyObjC+Dude · · Score: 1

    I would disagree. They are spot on when it comes to business tools vs toys.If you want to get the job done and be totally business, nothing can beat a BlackBerry. The Hub, general PIM functions, sound profiles, notifications cannot be matched by anybody to date.

    I made a huge mistake recently by switching from BB10 over to a Galaxy S5 and several weeks in, I am kicking myself for doing this. The Android is a gorgeous OS with lots of fun toys but when it comes to PIM and business productivity it just plain sucks. I had to root the damn thing just to get the volume button to not adjust my ringer volume ... WTF! Also, Android is so incredibly inconsistent and fragmented with its UI's. At least BlackBerry and Apple strive to get consistency with UI design.

    I know that Apple likely does a better job with PIM than Android but it still cannot compare to BlackBerry.

    The new BlackBerry Blend is an awesome implementation and model. Who needs syncing and the could when all your secure information is locked into to just one device that you have with you at all times. The concept is sound and implemented very well.

    But BlackBerry sucks for Linux support and you cannot run BB Link on many older OSX machines. This was a huge issue for me and a big reason for my switching as I don't buy new iWare and don't run Windows at my house any more. Also BB's method for connecting over USB through a virtual ethernet connection is beyond stupid. For instance, if you are running a Cisco VPN client and connected, it will block the BB connection and how stupid is that.

    I will switch back though once I find an old laptop that I can run Windohs 7 to connect and find someone that will trade a new Galaxy S5 for a Z30.

  64. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for all of the shorter words with 3 letters, it's almost impossible to get them right every time.

    And swype is far slower at this...

    Actually, it's slightly slower at everything, and I have thin fingers.

  65. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by Zeromous · · Score: 1

    Congramulations! U JUST got the koke. Srry capd. U'v won a freeeb bluetooth keyboard!

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  66. Re:Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Righ by gweihir · · Score: 1

    I really do not care how _you_ waste your time. While it may be true you are in a dead-end job that you do not enjoy and "working" on you phone is your escape from it, I do enjoy my work and I like being efficient at it. I do realize that professional quality-level tools are not the right fit for most people and please, by all means, stick with your toy. As long as BB survives and puts out an actually useful phone now and then, I am fine. You cannot dominate the market with something that is actually really good, people are just too stupid for that.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  67. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    It's almost like we need a system to take care of that. I think we should call it something fancy like "predictive auto-correct".

    Then you also need to consider the huge burden of simply clicking the correct word suggestion. *sigh* It's all too hard.

  68. First sentence fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one to point out that the very first sentence is epic fail?

    What a shitty submission.

    And to the article, the Z30 would be the iPhone equivalent, both being touch screen with bigger screens. Except the Z30 has more hardware features than iPhone 6. SD, USB, hdmi, etc.

  69. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use BES, then everything is encrypted with a unique key that BlackBerry doesn't have.

  70. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. R by snowsnoot · · Score: 1

    How is this any more/less secure than an ActiveSync over SSL with your own keys though? I don't see the benefit of it. I always thought that as soon as the Android / iOS devices caught up with corporate users needs the Blackberry heydays would be over. It was only a matter of time.

  71. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by doccus · · Score: 1

    t0ucch scvreemns sUclk./

  72. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by doccus · · Score: 1

    Its good enough that Im willing to look past it to avoid all of the other massive issues Blackberry has, like its inability to interact meaningfully with the world outside of its corporate network.

    Sounds like the BB has a mild case of autism

  73. I'm lovin' it by frog_strat · · Score: 2

    I've had it three days and love it. After the Palm Pre I don't think I could be excited about another slab phone. Pressing on a piece of glass is not well suited to human anatomy or kinetic pleasure. I love the Classic and also enjoy how much that angers everyone. From an Android dev.

  74. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

    I find tapping slightly faster than swyping, but swyping far more comfortable, and I prefer comfort over speed. I still have and use a BB along with my Note3. The Note3 shits all over the BB in every area.

  75. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

    This is why I got a Note3. Bigger screen and stylus makes this easier to deal with.

  76. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    (haha, my typing/keyboard just screwed this up, starting again) It's quicker to just use voice input. Then the person at the receiving end can set the phone to read the message so it can be heard without as much attention being demanded. some day, somebody will devise a system which will allow you to send an audible message to somebody else. Maybe even realtime synchronous audible communication will someday be possible.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  77. Re: Best of 2009? May be, but we live in 2014. Rig by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    my big fat fingers are pretty lousy, even for swyping, but a big fat stylus works very well for swyping for me.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.