Slashdot Mirror


BlackBerry's Survival Plan: the Internet of Things

jfruh writes BlackBerry's smartphone business is famously floundering, but the company isn't betting everything on its new retro physical-keyboard phones. It's also making moves into distributed, embedded, and asset-tracking computing for homes, cars, and businesses, which can all be lumped under the currently trendy "Internet of Things" buzzword umbrella. The company got a head start when it acquired the QNX OS in 2010, which was intended as the basis of a new smartphone OS but which already had credibility in the embedded market.

74 comments

  1. Can they do it? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    How hard is it to reposition a company?

    1. Re:Can they do it? by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      Somewhere between "impossible" and "as easy as throwing a chair across the room."

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Can they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it depends on the size of the company and more importantly the culture.

      I worked at a much smaller company that did a very effective shift for honestly many of the same reasons. We saw the writing on the wall. Other (much larger) companies were stepping into our niche and basically wiping us out. We couldn't fight them and we knew it.

      Much like Blackberry is doing, we looked at what we were actually good at, and shifted our business around them. Culturally pretty much everyone knew it was that or we were all out of work.

      As the article says, blackberry wasn't always just about phones. They've got some other solid areas (not to mention infrastructure that probably makes even google drool). If their culture supports it, they can probably rebuild themselves around that stuff.

    3. Re:Can they do it? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      So I guess the old Microsoft was at the bottom of your chart?

    4. Re:Can they do it? by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      Blackberry has incredible resistance to change. That's why they were left in the dust by Apple and Google. They might get around to repositioning the company in ten years but unfortunately they won't be around then.

    5. Re:Can they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can to their infrastructure and it isn't really great at all, consider we keep scaling back. Once upon a time this was true, not now.

    6. Re:Can they do it? by alen · · Score: 3, Informative

      ask apple

      they went from a computer company to a mobile device company. MS is going all cloud. Amazon went from books to a huge cloud business. IBM doesn't make typewriters any more.

      it's done all the time

    7. Re:Can they do it? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      The easiest way to visualize Microsoft's business strategy is to envision an ant trapped in a maze. The ant hits a wall, waves her antennae around a bit, picks a totally random direction and tries again. Rinse and repeat until the ant finds her way out of the maze or starves to death.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Can they do it? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      they went from a computer company to a mobile device company.

      That doesn't make any sense. Apple is still a computer company. That and mobile devices are computers.

    9. Re: Can they do it? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Under Balmer it was "Let's make a half assed copy of whatever Apple was doing a year ago".

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    10. Re:Can they do it? by riis138 · · Score: 2

      This literally made my day. Thank you for the image of an ant with a Steve Ballmer head crawling around a maze yelling "Developers, Developers, Developers!!!"

      --
      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
    11. Re: Can they do it? by riis138 · · Score: 1

      and then publicly mock whatever Apple was doing any chance he got.

      --
      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
    12. Re:Can they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CEO John Chen turned around Sybase so he has experience in repositioning a technology company. Here is a good article about his background.

      http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-magazine/john-chens-simple-plan-to-save-blackberry/article17065516/?page=all

    13. Re:Can they do it? by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      It's better they try and fail than not try at all.

      Just ask Nortel.

      If they're serious about it, and properly examine the assets and tech they already have, I'm sure they can find something they're good at.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    14. Re: Can they do it? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      I hear that was a rejected idea for the Ant-Man movie.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    15. Re:Can they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a very important point. Apple wants people to forget that they are buying computers or they will start to wonder why they cannot do the normal things you can on computers. Things like, install software you bought from whatever store you want, develop code for it (without having to go through a lot of hoops), connect it to common devices using standard computer interfaces, replace the battery or upgrade it. They think they will make more money by intentionally limiting it so they don't call it a PC -- they don't even call their laptops and desktops PCs -- so you will think it is different. Remember when Microsoft had PocketPC for their mobile devices? I haven't forgotten.

    16. Re:Can they do it? by Jumunquo · · Score: 1

      That would be an improvement! Their strategy is to follow the white ant because it knows where the food is, and after the white ant takes the food, they look for scraps it left behind. Even when the white ant hits a dead end and spins in circles, they are undeterred in heading over there.

    17. Re:Can they do it? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I can to their infrastructure and it isn't really great at all

      I can tell, apparently it drops words from packets. You should at least checksum that baby.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    18. Re:Can they do it? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well apparently it was real easy for them to reposition qnx from "king of embedded" to an also-ran for IoT.

      frankly speaking, qnx is unnecessary for IoT and if it comes with a licensing cost.. .. would you choose it? it's not like you have to have it.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    19. Re:Can they do it? by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Yeah. those pocketpc devices were great.

      fabulous battery life->course, you had to carry around multiple batteries to swap if you actually used it like people use iPhones now
      anybody could develop for them->after buying the developer license from Microsoft
      buy software from multiple vendors to load onto it->besides the fact that compared to the iPhone now [or even 6 months after the iPhone app store went live], there was basically a rounding error amount of software for it, that you hunt around to find, and then figure out if the software would work on your phone [sorry, no refunds], and if you were a developer, you either had to sell the software yourself [which back then was a huge hassle to handle transactions and then walk the end user through actually getting the software onto the device] or you sold through a carrier or one of a fairly small number of online software sales companies, where you got the short end of the stick of the split [70/30 - 90/10 or worse]. and users had X, which, like iTunes, easily lets you add and remove apps from your pocketpc device. oh wait, no, there was nothing like that. some places had you use text messages to try to download via your data plan [not cheap]
      pocketpc ui->who can forget having to poke around small windows-like menus/buttons/etc with a stylus, or moving the mouse with the arrow keys. and you had to have the slide-out keyboard.
      WinCE->the only software MS ever put out with the right name: wince The version that shipped on your device was usually the one still on it when you threw it away. Part of the "buy a new phone to get the latest OS" strategy preferred by carriers and hardware makers.

      Those were the good old days.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    20. Re:Can they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or it could be the majority of their audience doesn't care about those things even if they were (easily) possible.

  2. Stop The Internet Of Things by barbariccow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The Internet of Things" is so dumb. It was never called "The Internet of Computers" when computers were hooked up, and technically all these "things" have computers in them. And a network exists in the ether between devices; communication. I'm just so tired of this buzz phrase, I cringe every time I hear it. It's like "Information Superhighway", except less relate-able .

    1. Re:Stop The Internet Of Things by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I hate the phrase as much as you do, but I'd never seen it like that before.

      You're right, it's like saying "the rail network of stations" or "the interstate highway network of like cities and towns and diners with huge thermometers and all that shit".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. They're screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, they're throwing everything they've got left in a buzzword which makes out-of-touch techies excited but which no one actually wants. This isn't even a gamble - It's suicide.

    1. Re:They're screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This stuff does have a way of working out though. Not saying it will, but it might.

      At the corporate level, all major companies speak in buzzwords. Below that, the people developing the product, and the customers of that product, have technical people who see through the bullshit. Sometimes they even get to talk directly!

      Example: I love opensplice DDS. You go to their website and it's buzzword soup, but it's a solid product and the people behind it are good people. They just need to plaster IoT and Cloud all over the place to appease the upper corporate rungs. The important thing is identifying and avoiding people who actually buy into it. Avoid like the plague any developer who talks passionately about IoT outside of a conference room.

    2. Re:They're screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "IoT" in terms of consumer products, yes, it's a buzzword and no one wants. But other M2M applications like asset tracking and wireless smart metering would be a good business move.

    3. Re:They're screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avoid like the plague any developer who talks passionately about IoT outside of a conference room.

      Well, that's about half the tech events in Silicon Valley these days!

  4. and don't hook the little thingies up, either by swschrad · · Score: 1

    I can see a hundred little bots fouling up your house with this IofT nonsense. one release, no upgrade path, no thought of security built-in, sell 'em and run. I have several candidates, and there is NOT going to be any RJ45 or wifi permissions for them. period.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:and don't hook the little thingies up, either by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      That's what VLANs are for. It's easy enough to segment your home network into trusted and untrusted devices if the 'untrusted' ones derive usefulness from being internet connected. One can provide them with access to the internet without having access to all of your personal data.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:and don't hook the little thingies up, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you need a VLAN for that? Your hosts either have a firewall or don't expose services. For example your notebook computer has a firewall. Don't turn it off. Your tablet (assuming iPad or Android) doesn't expose services. Why can't some leaky, insecure, IoT device share that same network? Just because slashdot can't seem to use https?

    3. Re:and don't hook the little thingies up, either by firewrought · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can see a hundred little bots fouling up your house with this IofT nonsense. one release, no upgrade path, no thought of security built-in, sell 'em and run. I have several candidates, and there is NOT going to be any RJ45 or wifi permissions for them. period.

      Oh hi! I'm your new LG refrigerator. Before I unlock the doors, please agree to this EULA and wait half-an-hour while I download the latest firmware!

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    4. Re:and don't hook the little thingies up, either by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You don't NEED it but I think it's GOOD PRACTICE to have it. Do you trust Windows enough to be sure that no one can access your file shares if they're on the same LAN segment? Do you trust your closed-source TiVo enough to know that the folks at TiVo (or a black hat) can't remote into it and explore your network if they're so inclined? I don't. Why does my TiVo need to be in the same broadcast domain as the file server that contains my complete financial history and e-mail archives going back to 1991?

      I have three VLANs. One for completely trusted devices, one for untrusted devices (the Android phone sits on this one, incidentally) that need internet access, and a third one for friends/guests that wish to use my Wi-Fi. They do not talk to each other. There's no reason for them to.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:and don't hook the little thingies up, either by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      except for the personal data that they directly collect, like a video feed, whether anyone is home, whether the alarm is on or not.

  5. The Internet of Dead Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    BlackBerry CEO: It's not dead - it's pining for the fjords....

  6. Cool name, is it taken? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    "Buzzword Umbrella Corporation"

    Google: No results found for "Buzzword Umbrella Corporation".

    Quick, someone grab it!

    1. Re:Cool name, is it taken? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      1 result (0.15 seconds)

      Now that I've written it, it exists.

      Hurray! /Zoidberg

    2. Re:Cool name, is it taken? by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      You usually don't want to be associated with the Umbrella Corporation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umbrella_Corporation).

      (\/) (,,,) (\/)

      (Why not Zoidberg?)

  7. foundering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the word you really want here is foundering., yeah sure, floundering like a fish on a deck, gasping for air, but it's the deck of a ship that is foundering.

  8. BlackBerry is fine by acoustix · · Score: 2

    They still have the best mobile management software out there. Citrix, Good, MobileIron, etc can't touch BB's offerings.

    Plus they have QNX which is used in billions of devices around the world. So what if their handhelds aren't popular? Who cares? They will continue to have a niche market in handhelds.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:BlackBerry is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I keep hearing BlackBerry Enterprise Server is an abomination to deal with from anyone who works in IT?

    2. Re:BlackBerry is fine by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Plus they have QNX which is used in billions of devices around the world. So what if their handhelds aren't popular? Who cares? They will continue to have a niche market in handhelds.

      Which doesn't mean much if it doesn't generate that much revenue. They bought QNX for $200 million. There's no way that's what one pays for a business generating lots of profits.

    3. Re:BlackBerry is fine by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      And to further support this point. From a Forbes article:

      However, despite the strong proliferation and installed base, the QNX business is not believed to be very meaningful to BlackBerry’s financial performance (the company does not break out QNX financials). The business generates revenues through the licensing of QNX software products and through the professional services that BlackBerry provides to customers for developing QNX powered devices. Estimates from Bloomberg peg QNX revenues at just about 2% of BlackBerry’s total sales and IHS analysts estimate software licensing fees at a relatively paltry $3 per vehicle.

      So something that is estimated to account for less than even 5% of its revenue is not going to save the company from imploding.

    4. Re:BlackBerry is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no point in managing what nobody wants to use. Blackberry fucked up and now they're a niche player. They better hope that nice doesn't get scooped up or become obsolete.

      They utterly failed to recognize the shift in the mobile marketplace. What were once functions exclusive to expensive high-end buisness devices and networks were suddenly available to everybody.

      How badly can you fuck up when your audience suddenly grows from a subset of the mobile market, to the entire market? How do dumb do you have to be to have a head start on all of your competitors and fail to sell products to your most rabid devotees?

      I'll tell you how it happened. Your average business man noticed that his wife and kid's phone started coming with an awesome trouch screen, web browser, and a cool app store with all of the great trendy useful apps. Why didn't his blackberry have these things? A few weeks later he talks to his tech guys, who are also toying around with this new devices and says. "Hey, can I get my work email on this new smartphone thing?" The tech guys go "Yeah. They can get it right from the exchange server and we don't even need this shitty, fucked up, pain in the ass BES farm. It cheaper too since it's a non-BB plan from the carrier." Said buisnessman thinks 'Well fuck this noise. Who needs two phones? I'm getting an iphone!'

      And the rest is history.

    5. Re:BlackBerry is fine by acoustix · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the BES12 service, not the legacy server. But even the legacy server was ridiculously easy to manage by anyone with half a brain.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    6. Re:BlackBerry is fine by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Seeing how Ford will have QNX in almost all of their cars going forward, I'd say that QNX is a nice little profit for BB.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    7. Re:BlackBerry is fine by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      because it's not covered by MCSE for Dummies

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:BlackBerry is fine by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      It remains to be seen if they will eventually "win" the car computers system market or if they will do just like they did in the smartphone market, be an early player unable to innovate and becoming irrelevant in less than 10 years.

    9. Re:BlackBerry is fine by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Ah...but the killer feature BlackBerry brought to QNX is BES (BlackBerry Enterprise Server) connectivity. BlackBerry was never a mobile handset company. They were always a mobile communications company that sold two way pagers / phones. You see, BlackBerry has an international network in place. It's no longer needed to support their phones so it is being re-purposed to allow encrypted communication between all those QNX devices out there and a companies BES. Each QNX device connected means a license and each BES means a service agreement. If you bother to look at everything QNX is already running (Cisco network equipment, industrial automation [SCADA] equipment, medical electronics, and over 50% of the automobiles made today) you might begin to understand just how well positioned BlackBerry is to take advantage of the IoT. Earlier this year BlackBerry invested heavily in NantHealth and today they announced the HBox gen 2. A health monitoring device that will send its data in real-time back to the doctor via a BES. That's a potentially huge market.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    10. Re:BlackBerry is fine by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It remains to be seen if they will eventually "win" the car computers system market or if they will do just like they did in the smartphone market, be an early player unable to innovate and becoming irrelevant in less than 10 years.

      As long as reliability and stability remain the key requirements for car computer systems, then Android, iPhone, and Microsoft will never compete. Also, QNX UI is improving as well, so if they have to compete directly on UI, they have a decent chance there as well.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:BlackBerry is fine by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      I'd say that reliability and stability in car navigation and audio system is just as important as smartphones reliability and stability. We are not talking about ABS, airbags, or other safety-critical car subsystems here.

    12. Re:BlackBerry is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that reliability and stability in car navigation and audio system is just as important as smartphones reliability and stability. We are not talking about ABS, airbags, or other safety-critical car subsystems here.

      Those subsystems run QNX as well in most manufacturers.

  9. Perfect by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

    If Blackberry jumps on the Internet Of Things bandwagon then we can finally get our wish of having the term killed, beaten to a pulp, and buried.

    1. Re:Perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good idea. Make the term extremely uncool by being linked to BlackBerry.

  10. The funny thing is... by Loopy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have two family members that use new Blackberries. One has a model from about 14 months ago and my brother just got one about a month ago. They are both somewhat limited in terms of apps but conversely, they both have stupid amounts of battery life and they Just Work(tm). They're business phones so obviously they aren't getting stressed with Youtube/Netflix/etc. Still, it appears to be a solid product, if probably unsexy to the people always on my lawn.

    1. Re:The funny thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Q10 and I love it. Fast, reliable and that battery can last forever, compared to Android phone my wife has.
      If you need to write emails on the go, nothing beats BlackBerry QWERTY keyboard.

    2. Re:The funny thing is... by ControlsGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Still, it appears to be a solid product, if probably unsexy to the people always on my lawn."
      I still use my Blackberry Tour daily, bought about 5 years ago. Sooner or later it will die and I will replace it with a Blackberry Classic. I really don't associate sex with anything to do with smartphones because I figured out how to get sex before Tinder. My lawn is immaculate.

    3. Re:The funny thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1. This is why the Google CEO still uses a BB. Android is just not there yet. I've had a BB since '04 and it's just no fun trying to move off the platform. It's too much work. And I can run Android apps in the sandbox, so who cares about apps? /shrug

      http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcrackberry.com%2Fgoogles-eric-schmidt-still-loves-his-blackberry-bold-9900&ei=RyyvVJb2IY2HNveEhIAK&usg=AFQjCNG8ZZb_5Rud6YLtt0BAZ1yWpCyNtw&bvm=bv.83339334,d.eXY

      We are the 1% (BB market share lol) The car I drive to work is equally rare, though. And people always make fun of the engine location, like they always ask about my BB. Throttle steer and physical keyboard. Any questions?

    4. Re: The funny thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should go fuck yourself and die

  11. survival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the worst survival plans I've ever heard of.
    This is up there with the Carthaginian survival plan.

  12. Nintendo Started As a Card Company by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

    Nintendo started as a card company. Nokia started as a paper company.

    Blackberry could get into the hogs trading market.

    Not as fancy as selling phones, but I've heard as an industry it really brings home the bacon.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    1. Re:Nintendo Started As a Card Company by pspahn · · Score: 2

      I'd fuckin' buy Blackberry Bacon!

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:Nintendo Started As a Card Company by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      And Coleco started as a leather goods company. It's even in the name... COlorado LEather COmpany.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    3. Re:Nintendo Started As a Card Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Connecticut Leather Company.

  13. This will be interesting by Baron_Yam · · Score: 0

    They have been unable to make their smartphones work in the consumer market, and they've burned a lot of bridges with their corporate customers.

    So... given the track record of being unable to judge the market and put out a solid, single product the company was focused on, they expect to succeed at putting out a variety of products with which they have no experience and know nothing about the market?

    Good luck. I expect Waterloo will have some good commercial real estate freed up soon.

  14. torch form factor running android - I'm buying by vpness · · Score: 1

    my gut tells me that there's lots of us out there who miss our bberry keyboard ... whilst still loving the apps that android gives us. I'd pay more than what I do for my samsung for a well made, slide up, vertical keyboard and bberry battery life.

  15. IoT or MpD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those dorks! Don't they know that 2015 is the break out year for Magic pixie Dust? The IoT is just a fairy tale.

  16. OMG Karl Denninger's head... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just exploded.

  17. Not a new thing by DUdsen · · Score: 1

    Doing their hayday blackberry bought one of the companies who essentially invented the whole idea of internet of things, and a big player in the embedded market(QNX) so they have had a department doing that for a while, just not under the blackberry brand, but since knowing industry details is beyond most of the tech press we get snark and fluffy editorials on weather or not a mobile company can transform itself.

    In essence what your seeing is that blackberry downplay it's old porfolio and tries to live off the one competent profitable company they bought doing their uptick, other companies have done so successfully before. but the thing to notice here is that the part of blackberry doing this were making internet of thing devices before anyone in the IT press even heard of the term.

  18. I Have a Question. by abhishek765 · · Score: 1

    Android phones allow using BBM free {Blackberry Messenger Free(only internet needed)}, but when it comes to Blackberry smartphones, you have to activate a BBM plan to chat with your friends, and the BBM plan rates are above Rs.199. In this plan you are not allowed to use internet, you can only chat with your friends using the BBM. If you want to use internet you have to activate another internet plan. Where Android phones allow using BBM in your General Internet Plan. So Why Blackberry charges extra to use BBM?

  19. QNX Infotainment centers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Microsoft infotainment center in my Ford F-150. Such a nice truck and I have one complaint. The Microsoft software. I read up on it and it turns out that I am not alone. A lot of people complain about it.

    I vowed to never buy another vehicle with Microsoft in it. And I've seen what the QNX automotive solution can do for the past few years (Go see youttube videos on CES QNX 20xx demo car). They have an insane solution for infotainment and the turn around times for the software price are supposedly very short.

    Ford is switching to QNX and I can not wait to get my next Ford (or whomever has QNX in it). I literally will not buy a car without he QNX solution.

  20. Blackberry + security by phorm · · Score: 1

    From the early days, Blackberry has had better mobile security than competitors. Even today, though their app selection is more limited, their permissions model is better.

    I like my Android, but if I'm going to have something integrated into my home or vehicle, I'd go for "more security+reliable" over "pretty with apps"