Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Set To Launch Mobile Payment System With Galaxy S6 At MWC

dkatana writes: Samsung will introduce the Galaxy S6 on Sunday, March 1st, at the Barcelona Forum, one day before the Mobile World Congress officially starts. Serious rumors from different sources indicate that the Korean giant will also introduce its version of a global mobile payment system, which will likely have the moniker "Samsung Pay." Samsung can't afford to give away its position in the smartphone market, and a payments system tailored to customers is a key factor.

82 comments

  1. What a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder how they came up with it...

    1. Re:What a great idea by internerdj · · Score: 2

      I wonder why they came up with it. Google wallet was already compatible with the previous generation of Galaxy phones. I'm going to want a good reason to choose Samsung's app over the Google app, if I were even interested in using my phone for that sort of thing.

    2. Re:What a great idea by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder why they came up with it

      Because they want a cut. Because they want the analytics. Because they want the market share. Because they want to tie you to their platform.

      They don't give a crap if someone else's app runs on their phone .... they want the money, and the data, and customer lock-in if possible.

      Do you seriously need to ask? Why does a corporation do anything besides "branding" and "money"?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:What a great idea by internerdj · · Score: 2

      Sorry. I was really wondering why they think that I would choose their app over Google's?

    4. Re:What a great idea by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Branding ... you'll have a Samsung phone, and probably opt to go with a Samsung wallet because it's probably pushed in your face and easy to use, and you don't have to go looking for it.

      Hell, they'll probably have a wizard to sign you up quick like. Everything the handset makers do is more or less designed to drive you towards using their stuff.

      Why let Google get that business, and all that tasty analytics data, when you can get it yourself?

      Whether or not it has any decentsecurity will be seen -- me, I predict a huge amount of people will get their financial information compromised by more than one of these services over the next year.

      It seems practically a given that at least two of them will fuck up on security and privacy, and relatively soon.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:What a great idea by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I was clearing out the apps on my GS3 last night, somehow i had over 110 apps. After clearing out the apps i dont use, i probably have 10 apps that I chose to download. About 1/2 of the apps are build in google stuff that I actually use, the rest is new good/samsung stuff that i dont want, and without rooting cant remove.

      ive been holding out on a new phone waiting on the new note/ Galaxy line, as ive been happy with them since i gave up my droid line, but i think im gonna look around a little harder this time around. because im sick of the samsung crap taking up space on my phone

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    6. Re:What a great idea by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      Does their app work outside of the US? Then yes, they'll kick Google Wallet's ass.

    7. Re:What a great idea by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I was really wondering why they think that I would choose their app over Google's?

      I don't "like" google. I certainly don't trust google. Google already has a huge amount of data on me.

      So why would I choose Google over Samsung?

      "Not being google" alone is a compelling reason for me to look at samsung and other viable alternatives.

    8. Re:What a great idea by adolf · · Score: 1

      Google already has my credit card information (Play Store, AdWords, et al).

      Why would I want give it to yet another party like Samsung?

      And indeed, why would I want my in-person payment method to be tied to a specific manufacturer? Google Wallet works with anything that can speak NFC, as far as I can tell, while a Samsung solution will certainly only operate on Samsung devices.

    9. Re:What a great idea by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I kept with all the bloated Samsung crap on my S4 before I switched to a Google Edition-based rom and haven't looked back. I don't think there's a single feature that the Samsung software gave me that the Google Edition software doesn't do better, or that I just didn't care about the gimmicks of TouchWiz.

    10. Re:What a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does a corporation do anything besides "branding" and "money"?

      They also do things to save time, and make themselves look good.

      Three points of fast business decisions: Does it make me look good? Does it make/save me money? Does it save me time?

      If it's not negative, it tends to cover the initial question of whether you have an interest in doing something.

    11. Re:What a great idea by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they came up with it...

      I suppose they saw what Google was doing with Google Wallet in the US and wanted a global solution.

    12. Re:What a great idea by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Google already has my credit card information (Play Store, AdWords, et al).

      This isn't about your card information. This is your transaction information.

      Why would I want give it to yet another party like Samsung?

      As I said, this is about spreading my profile data around. The more entitites that have a piece of it, the better. No one entity has a complete picture.

      Company A knows: I spend X here, Y there, Z there.
      Company B knows: I travelled here, there, and the next place.
      Company C knows: my heart rate was all day, and how many steps I took
      Company D knows: what i looked up on the web

      Company A/B/C/D each know a bit about me, and try and sell some ad impressions based on it or whatever.

      I think that is FAR better than giving ALL that to google or any other single entity. And then one person can stalk you simply by getting access to your google profile and get more detail than he could if he literally followed you around.

      And indeed, why would I want my in-person payment method to be tied to a specific manufacturer? Google Wallet works with anything that can speak NFC, as far as I can tell,

      What? You mean I can use Google Wallet with something that takes Apple Pay?

      while a Samsung solution will certainly only operate on Samsung devices.

      And if I'm carrying a samsung device in my pocket... that seems to be ok. I mean, what if one day I switch to an HTC phone? Seems like that's a decision for 2 years from now? Why worry about it?

      I mean, I have a Visa from BankX in my pocket right now. 2 years from now I might use a Visa from Bank Y. Who cares? As long as what I have in my pocket today works where I want to use it today, I'm set.

    13. Re:What a great idea by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Samsung is a hardware company, Google is an advertising company.

      --
      Good-bye
    14. Re:What a great idea by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Because it came with the phone.

    15. Re:What a great idea by compro01 · · Score: 1

      I doubt it'll fly in Canada. For that matter, I wonder if they'll even try.

      Interac has almost universal availability and their NFC version ("Interac Flash") is already available to certain Android smartphone users.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    16. Re:What a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible they want to expand the territories (for above reasons) The two incumbents don't seem to have any problem staying in the US because they're US companies.

      I'm in Canada. If I can get a US credit card and install Google Wallet while down in the states, I can use my phone to pay at our wireless terminals. A *LOT* of stores have NFC capability, my Galaxy S5 and Galaxy Nexus both have NFC capability...

      but I can't use it because they're US-centric.

      I hope Samsung expands to Canada.

  2. Don't trust any of them ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but there isn't a single player in the "pay with your phone" market I trust. Nor will there ever be

    Neither to safeguard my financial data, nor to not be complete douchebags with the information they'd get from it.

    Sorry Samsung, and Apple, and Google, and Microsoft ... and the whole lot of you ... giving you access to my credit cards sounds like a Dumb Fucking Idea(tm).

    And the carriers who muck about with the phone to lock it to them and inject their own crap? I trust them even less.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by rgbscan · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know how the others work - but Apple doesn't get your card number. They get a device id which is used to seed and generate one-time use tokens in conjunction with the card issuing networks.

    2. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Pay by phone is not really any more convenient than pay by card. In fact, it may be less convenient. I've never understood the appeal from a consumer point of view. I do understand why many companies want it to take hold, its another place to insert yourself in the money stream.

    3. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Even if Apple has the card number - credit cards have built-in fraud protection.

      I trust Google with my credit card info, and in the event that they screw up (as of yet, they're one of the few people who HASN'T screwed up at this point with a major breach a la Target and TJ Maxx), the card still has fraud protection.

      Wanna bet Samsung's crap is ACH-backed like CurrentC? If it is - STAY THE HELL AWAY.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by mlts · · Score: 1

      Oh, with their Knox stuff and the permanent eFuse blowing, their stuff will be "secure".

      (/sarcasm)

      If Samsung offered a way to unlock bootloaders similar to what Sony and HTC do, I'd might consider them, but with having to put a bounty just for root access... I'll find a vendor that will allow me full access to my device first.

      Of course, there is the payment mechanism. Is it like CurrentC where there is zero protection as it directly grabs money from your account? If the payment mechanism isn't credit card based (so there is protection against fraud), I wouldn't want to get near it.

    5. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by alen · · Score: 1

      the retailer doesn't have my CC number with pay by phone for hackers to grab off their servers

    6. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but there isn't a single player in the "pay with your phone" market I trust. Nor will there ever be

      Neither to safeguard my financial data, nor to not be complete douchebags with the information they'd get from it.

      Sorry Samsung, and Apple, and Google, and Microsoft ... and the whole lot of you ... giving you access to my credit cards sounds like a Dumb Fucking Idea(tm).

      And the carriers who muck about with the phone to lock it to them and inject their own crap? I trust them even less.

      Apple Pay never sees your Credit Card info or who you are paying at all. This is because they never ask for or ever store your credit card info. It's all handled by your bank. Apple Pay appears to be incredibly secure.

      Google sees everything because they insist you register your credit card with them and they bill everything through themselves. It ruins your ability to get cash back / rewards on your credit cards / payments. Provided Google doesn't get hacked your info is probably secure although Google is selling your info to everyone. If your phone is rooted I would worry about the security of your Google logon.

      Samsung appears to be using LoopPay which is basically the standard swipe plus having Credit & Debit Card info stored on your phone. Probably insecure unless that info is in a secure element and you cannot root the phone. Plus Samsung will have access to your payment info and info on who you're paying for them to sell. This appears to be the worst of all worlds but I'll wait until I see if they've updated the system.

      No idea what Microsoft is going for but I assume it's the same as Apple Pay as all the banks will have done the work required for the backends already.

    7. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wait, what?

      How on Earth can Apple tie your account activity to a credit card without ever having that credit card number to generate that token?

      And, if at ANY point in this chain Apple has your credit card number ... why would I trust they (or any other corporation) aren't retaining that.

      I don't see how any of this one-time token stuff can be generated without first having your credit card information.

      There's either a missing step there in which they certainly do have it ... or there is voodoo magic by which they can attach your account information to you without knowing anything.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if Apple has the card number - credit cards have built-in fraud protection.

      I trust Google with my credit card info, and in the event that they screw up (as of yet, they're one of the few people who HASN'T screwed up at this point with a major breach a la Target and TJ Maxx), the card still has fraud protection.

      Wanna bet Samsung's crap is ACH-backed like CurrentC? If it is - STAY THE HELL AWAY.

      That's nice that the cards have fraud protection.

      Not sure what the fuck that really means to the consumer, since banking SOP with any breach of an account appears to be to re-issue the damn card anyway, forcing the consumer to do the usual song and dance with a change of your main credit or debit card number. So much for protection.

    9. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of crappy card makes you do a song and dance past telling them you want to refute a charge?

    10. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of crappy card company removes a fraudulent charge without issuing a new card with a new number?

    11. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wait, what?

      How on Earth can Apple tie your account activity to a credit card without ever having that credit card number to generate that token?

      And, if at ANY point in this chain Apple has your credit card number ... why would I trust they (or any other corporation) aren't retaining that.

      I don't see how any of this one-time token stuff can be generated without first having your credit card information.

      There's either a missing step there in which they certainly do have it ... or there is voodoo magic by which they can attach your account information to you without knowing anything.

      Apple gets your CC info during the SIGNUP process, which they then use to initiate a contract between you and your bank; then the ENTIRE transaction process on an ongoing basis is SOLELY between YOU and YOUR BANK. Apple gets ZERO "analytics" info that is tied to your identity.

    12. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever purchased anything from Play Store (android) or Apple Store? If you did, they already have your credit card number.

    13. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your *phone* has the card info. But it's all in hardware and local. Apple the company never gets it.

    14. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Pay by phone is not really any more convenient than pay by card. In fact, it may be less convenient. I've never understood the appeal from a consumer point of view. I do understand why many companies want it to take hold, its another place to insert yourself in the money stream.

      I agree that pay by phone is LESS convenient than pay by card. IMO, the industry is doing a disservice to its users by attempting to push that agenda.

      However, pay by phone *should* be MUCH MUCH more secure than the typical (US) pay by card (mag stripe).

      All you need to make transactions online or by phone as someone else is an impression of their card. Some businesses require the security code from the back of the card. Some require your home zip code. But not everyone does, so you can still make huge purchases without those. You can also clone the card by converting that info into the mag stripe info and writing it to a card (and the equipment needed for that is cheap and readily available).

      Let's ignore a lot of that for now and focus on the transaction level. Your card number, in the mag swipe method, ends up going through a lot of less-than-ideally secure areas. Look at the recent Target breech for an example. The fact is, it's both the identifier that is presented to the merchant (which could be a shady waiter carrying your card back to their register) and the identifier linking to your account - they're one in the same.

      With the virtual wallet implementations, they implemented cryptographically secure key generation and all kinds of stuff like that. Google doesn't ever see your card number, and neither does the merchant. There's some calculated tokens passed about that confirm your account and the result from the bank.
      With the virtual wallet implementations, your credit card number is not seen by google/apple nor the merchant during the transaction. In googles case, there's a virtual card used with randomly changing security codes to prevent reuse. In apples case, a DAN is used (device account number) issued by your bank, and dynamic security codes unique to each transaction are generated during transactions. There's a bunch of other stuff involved but, in short, it's much more secure than your mag stripe.

      IMO, the only real concern from the user end is that Google and Apple are essentially MITM to at least some parts of the transaction. They way the two work is quite different, so they both have different data flows. Either way, we're introducing another middle man to the process, and it'll probably only have a couple big players that are in that space skimming little bits of money off every transaction. I wish we were getting rid of some of the rest of the old kruft with this move, but we're not, and we're just adding more to it. It does help get rid of the mag stripe though, and that thing needs to go.

    15. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The improvement is that over time I will no longer have to carry my wallet. Credit cards, and drivers license are basically the only two things left in my wallet today. Credit cards will disappear with Apple/Samsung/GooglePay. Drivers license apps are already being trailed by various countries and states. Hopefully soon, the whole wallet will just be a thing of the past.

    16. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by unrtst · · Score: 1

      What kind of crappy card company removes a fraudulent charge without issuing a new card with a new number?

      This is one nice side effect of the digital wallets. Your actual card number is not used in the transaction*. So, if there's a fraudulent charge via the wallet, it can be contested/removed/etc without any need to re-issue the underlying card number.

      * Google uses a temporary mastercard number for each transaction
      * Apple uses a DAN (device account number) and dynamic security codes

    17. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

      How on Earth can Apple tie your account activity to a credit card without ever having that credit card number to generate that token?

      And, if at ANY point in this chain Apple has your credit card number ... why would I trust they (or any other corporation) aren't retaining that.

      I don't see how any of this one-time token stuff can be generated without first having your credit card information.

      There's either a missing step there in which they certainly do have it ... or there is voodoo magic by which they can attach your account information to you without knowing anything.

      Well, they have your credit card number, for a few seconds during setup.

      Here's what happens:

      You get your phone, and you snap a photo of your credit card. Your phone recognizes the card and number, and forwards that information to Apple Corporate HQ. Apple then uses that information to determine which bank to talk to (because all banks have different ways to implement this step, and why Apple Pay only works with certain banks). Apple forwards that information to the bank. Apple also forwards some hardware information hash to the bank.

      Your bank then calls you (or verifies you in some way) to ensure that you're actually registering your card (the bank looks up the information - Apple doesn't have that information after all). If it's approved, the bank sends Apple a token. The token is a virtual credit card where the last 4 digits are identical to the real credit card. That token is what is stored on your device, and the credit card information promptly forgotten as it's no longer necessary.

      When you use Apple Pay, you select the card, and then use the fingerprint reader. When the iPhone talks to the payment system, it passes on the token and a hash representing your hardware ID. The payment system sees the token, and passes it onto the bank who verifies the hardware ID against their own database. If it matches, then they lookup the token against their database to find which account to charge.

      The credit card is used during initial setup only - after that you're passing around tokens which are unique identifiers for your card, phone, account by the bank. The bank issues the token and generates the mapping of tokens to cardholder accounts.

      If your number is stolen, then attempts to use it will fail because the hardware ID is invalid, and the bank sends you a NEW token to replace your old one.

      If you lose your phone, you can wipe your phone's secure element which erases keys to access your card information.

      Apple Pay is a fancy term for the EMV payment standard - there's no magic in it, and it's just implementing what the payment industry says is how they want to do it. It's why it "just works" in a lot of stores because the standard was done a while ago and implemented.

      http://www.macrumors.com/round...

      A more detailed analysis is
      http://www.tuaw.com/2014/10/02...

      (Read it quick because AOL is killing TUAW)

    18. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key for this system to work is EMV. The Chip+PIN encryption in use all over the world (except in the US) doesn't transmit the card number.
      Contactless cards use the microprocessor on the card to generate unique numbers for every transaction. The NXP PN66T does the same job on a smartphone.

    19. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      But, while maybe a higher proportion of slashdot readers think about the level of security, the general populace is quite happy with what they have, so the push from the consumer side just isn't there. Consumer demand drives adoption. And, to some extent, there is even a distrust of new technologies among a good portion of the market, regardless of the security benefit that they may not fully understand.

      That is why my point was regarding ease of use and not security. Smart cards are more secure than the magnetic strip cards we use, and can provide authentication benefits & a big security increase, but the US population hasn't demanded it, and where they are adopted it was more due to regulatory drivers.

      I think it is a bit easier to pull out my credit card and swipe it than to pull out my phone, select the payment app, & perform whatever authentication task is needed. But even if there isn't much difference, or if someone wanted to argue using a phone was a tad easier, there isn't a marked difference and its not something consumers feel is a problem area.

    20. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      Not if you bought your Play credits in the form of a gift card at a physical store. They have them even at grocery stores where I live.

    21. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      if there is a 10+ track record of this working and NOT being a walking privacy violation, maybe I'll consider it then.

      right now, network and system security is quite bad, across the board on ALL computer platforms. mobile is a 'sell the users' info' clusterfuck and so no players are to be trusted. its too sleazy of a market and all the bad players were attracted to it.

      are informed people (yeah, there are so few of those around) really willing to give this a try? boggle!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      You realize any establishment has your credit card info potentially forever if you've ever bought anything from them using your card? Trust in who you give your card to isn't what the system is built on. It's trust in the issuer of the card to not hold you liable for fraudulent transactions.

    23. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      No, the phone doesn't store the card info either.

    24. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      How on Earth can Apple tie your account activity to a credit card without ever having that credit card number to generate that token?

      They get it just long enough to transmit it to your bank which verifies the info.

      And, if at ANY point in this chain Apple has your credit card number ... why would I trust they (or any other corporation) aren't retaining that.

      Because they'd have no reason to lie about it. Also, if you have an iPhone and an Apple ID and you've used either iTunes or the App store to make any purchases they already have your credit card. There's no reason they'd need to build some secret DB of credit card info.

    25. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      IMO, the only real concern from the user end is that Google and Apple are essentially MITM to at least some parts of the transaction.

      For Apple Pay, Apple is not a "man in the middle". They are not in a position to get any information about what is actually happening. Any data processing is done in a chip inside the phone that the iPhone itself and Apple have no access to. And that's necessary to make sure that malware on a jailbroken iPhone cannot access your credit card information.

    26. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Generating such a token requires the card number. And the token is not single use. If it was, then what would be the point? Just send the card number every time. The token is used so that the merchant doesn't have to store the card number. Most merchants don't want the PCI responsibilities of storing a card number.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    27. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The retailer should (I know, I know) never have your card number stored. They should use the card number to generate a token which is stored (hopefully encrypted). While this may not look any better than just storing the card, if the token is stolen, it will only be useful at that particular merchant, and if other security is in place, such as transactions from that merchant being limited by IP, etc, then it is all but impossible for a token to be used fraudulently other than by someone inside the system.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    28. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by orlanz · · Score: 1

      So how do automated recurring payments work? How do you get your money back for fraud and prevent the vendor(s) from further charging your compromised card?

    29. Re:Don't trust any of them ... by unrtst · · Score: 1

      So how do automated recurring payments work?

      I honestly haven't looked that up. That said, I'm not sure if Google Wallet or Apple Pay have ever said they support such a use case. They both still use normal cards under the hood, so I suspect you'd still use those for your automated payments.

      How do you get your money back for fraud and prevent the vendor(s) from further charging your compromised card?

      Money back from fraud? You claim it was fraud; chargeback is issued; merchant must prove what happened to get their money; this continue past that, just like with a normal card. No difference.
      Prevent vendors from further charging your compromised card? I guess you didn't read what I wrote at all, and don't understand any of the digital wallets at all...

      * Google wallet: the vendor has what is essentially a one time card number. They can't make any other purchases on it if they wanted to.
      * Apple Pay: the vendor has your DAN and a dynamic security code. They can't make another purchase without the correct (next random) security code. If you're really paranoid, you can reset the DAN without changing any of your card numbers. The vendor does not have your card number (and neither does apple after initial setup).

  3. Oh how wonderful... NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As craptastic as Samsung's touchwiz interface is I can only imagine how bad their ability to handle financial transactions can be. Sorry Samsung - stick to hardware and let Google handle the software.

  4. Goodbye Samsung by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Samsung can't afford to give away its position in the smartphone market, and a payments system tailored to customers is a key factor."

    Samsung has been losing marketshare because customers HATE being assaulted with Samsung's crappy substandard "me-too" crapware.

    This is just more of the same. They just don't get it.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Goodbye Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Koreans in general. Hyundais are cars for people who don't like cars. Designed by a marketing department with some other cars spec sheet in hand.

    2. Re:Goodbye Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem Samsung makes the best phone around, hardware wise. So if you don't like their software, just swap it for something else. I bought the S5 (or S4, don't remember) and it was like buying a new laptop. Tonnes of crapware on it, so I went about replacing it.

      I first tried CyanogenMod but it had bugs (possibly fixed now, I'm not trying to disparage this project). Then I tried Ubuntu Touch but wasn't a fan of it at all. I finally settled for a stock Google Android.

      As long as I can keep treating my phone like any other computer, I couldn't care less what software is installed on it out of the box.

    3. Re:Goodbye Samsung by GuB-42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This me-too crapware is here for a reason : Samsung doesn't want to be the slave of Google.
      Why do you think Samsung has an OS that no one uses (Tizen) ? Simply so that if for some reason, Google decides to stop playing nice, Samsung can make the switch relatively quickly.
      And Samsung software is not all bad. It often has a few nice features, some may even end up being copied by Google.

    4. Re:Goodbye Samsung by adolf · · Score: 1

      Every smartphone I've ever had (except, perhaps, the OG Droid) has been full of crapware, irrespective of who manufactured it...at least initially.

      The process of deshitification goes something like this:

      1. Only buy phones that are rootable (which can vary by carrier).
      2. Order pizza.
      3. Root the phone.
      4. Install (and pay for) Titanium Backup.
      5. Use Ti Backup to freeze the apps you don't like.
      6. Open a beer.
      7. Pay delivery driver.
      8. Eat pizza.

    5. Re:Goodbye Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when do you drink the beer?

    6. Re:Goodbye Samsung by adolf · · Score: 1

      But when do you drink the beer?

      Drinking beer is implicit.

      The question is not when to drink the beer, but when/if to stop drinking beer.

      Perhaps I should have been clear, and wrote "Open another beer."

    7. Re:Goodbye Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Samsung has been losing market share because the other Android manufacturers caught up with them on specs, features & fashions, and when your competitors have joined you at the top of the heap, there isn't really anywhere else to go. You just have to share the top of the heap with an ever-increasing number of other climbers, until there's enough of them to climb on.

      Most customers don't care about the crapware that comes with their phones, just like they don't care what comes pre-installed on a new PC. If they don't use it, they'll either ignore it or they'll delete the icon and forget it's there.

      Only tech-literate customers care about crapware, and that's a pretty small subset of the market. And among the tech-literate, there are still those who'll just ignore the crapware (until it actually annoys them), and there are those who'll root their phones regardless. The remainder (those who hate crapware but do nothing about it but whine on the internet (hi there!)) are too few & far between to actually affect their sales figures.

    8. Re:Goodbye Samsung by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Samsung has been losing marketshare because customers HATE being assaulted with Samsung's crappy substandard "me-too" crapware.

      Which is why their Galaxy Google Play editions sold so well right? I mean all the awesome parts of the Samsung phone with zero crapware and a true vanilla Android experience would be perfect then right?

      No. They offer devices free of "crapware" and then people choose not to buy those devices.

      If you actually look at the trends then Samsung's market share dropped by less than 10% over the past 2 years and the only people who gained market share are "other". None of the majors gained market share. This is largely due to the rise of cheap Android clone phones in China with companies like Xiamoi and Hauwei on a steady increase, and also to a number of new market entrants who people are trialing.

      But hey I'll happily sign up to "don't get it" if I can take part in the pools of money they swim in considering that as of November they still had the largest market share of any vendor.

    9. Re:Goodbye Samsung by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      yeah, that's not why they have Tizen

  5. Will the Note 3 support it? by alen · · Score: 1

    or is it an old and obsolete phone and i have to be a good consumer and buy a new phone with the newer NFC

  6. Please remember... by Radish03 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please remember to SPay your retailers...

    1. Re:Please remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPay and nuter them of course.

  7. The appeal is much greater prevention by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    As the other responder noted, using my phone to pay means the store does not get my CC number, thus a hacker cannot ever get it...

    But even better, unlike a card in my wallet, if I lose my phone someone cannot use the phone to pay for anything, because it's based around the fingerprint reader.

    There's also the aspect that using the phone is more anonymous for simple store payments (a teller never gets my full name unlike with a card), though frankly I doubt that matters to almost anyone.

    Physically it's no LESS convenient to pay by phone than it is with a card, which is the most important aspect (people would not use it if less convenient).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The appeal is much greater prevention by cusco · · Score: 1

      My version of your post would go:

      using my cash to pay means the store does not get my CC number, thus a hacker cannot ever get it...

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    2. Re:The appeal is much greater prevention by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Physically it's no LESS convenient to pay by phone than it is with a card, which is the most important aspect (people would not use it if less convenient).

      You state it is no less convenient, but fail to provide a good basis. But regardless, people don't feel compelled to make a big switch in their habits unless they see a benefit. The convenience of credit cards over cash is indisputable, and it took a long time for may just to make that move. I contend the road to phone payments, particularly in the US, will be a longer and rockier one than the hype indicates.

    3. Re:The appeal is much greater prevention by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      using my cash to pay means the store does not get my CC number, thus a hacker cannot ever get it...

      You missed the part where someone stealing my phone can't use my money. Hackers are just one kind of thief. It's not like pick-pockets have vanished; far from it they have become more prevalent these days.

      If someone physically gets my wallet, whatever cash I had is simply gone. Sure a CC will not make me pay for false charges either, but why should a thief gain the reward of a whole side of beef or brand new sets of tires/wheels (neither of those theoretical examples, they are examples of past multi-thousand dollar purchases made on CC's stolen from people I know).

      I also like paying with cash for some things (especially tips, so that a server can choose how much to report to the IRS). But for all sorts of reasons a credit card is very nice to buy most things with, particularly I like it as a means to automatically get a list of past purchases.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. Not just NFC by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    NFC is just a mechanism to conduct a payment by, it's not worth much unless you have the other security aspects in place to make sure people can't easily clone your phone payments or use a stolen phone to pay for things.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. The first payment request... by zoffdino · · Score: 1

    Apple comes to the S6 presentation with a Samsung Pay-compatible terminal: "Legal bill: $900M. Pay now?".

    1. Re:The first payment request... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then who will Apple... pay? Google Wallet? Oyster? Octopus? Mobil? Upass?

      Contactless payment has been around for a long time - since the 1990s, in fact - and (outside the US) it's been available on phones since the early 2000s. Apple weren't even the first to put contactless payment on an iPhone. There are third-party covers for iPhones that offer roughly the same functionality.

      So when Apple announced Apple Pay, to the US, it might've seemed like an amazing new thing, but the US still uses cheques and filthy rags for money, so it's not like the US is at the forefront of commerce technology. The rest of the developed world has been using electronic cash for years. Apple are in no position to claim ownership of the idea.

  10. I don't trust Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No that I trust, say, Google - but, Samsung? The one thing you can trust Samsung to is to screw its customers in order to push them into upgrading whatever Samsung product they have. I have not Samsung phone, and I know my next flat screen TV won't be a Samsung one.

  11. Samsung camera division by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Going by how they turned the NX1 into an almost brand new camera with their latest firmware I'd say it'll be a long time before Samsung is out off the phone market.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  12. Monkey see, monkey do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Typical samsung! They should just close their devices division and focus on semiconductors, which they actually do well.

  13. Contactless may be the future, unfortunately by djdanlib · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest problem with these contactless payments, bigger even than trust, is that it separates you mentally from your money. It makes it easy for people to fail to develop and maintain responsible financial habits. It softens the blow of spending money. If that blow doesn't hurt, then you can imagine what happens to the thought of security. The closer you are to the cash, the more you pay attention to its security! Someone takes $20 out of your wallet, you get upset. Someone skims your card, you don't even notice, and if you ever find out, you hope the card company will just reverse the charge. What incentive do you have to care anymore?

    When you pay cash, you see the actual money leave your hands. A check is still symbolic in that you're giving them something permanently. When you pay with a debit card, you start to really lose the connection to your money. You put it back in your wallet when you're done. We have had contactless payments for a while and when you use it, you don't think, just buy. I used to have a Paypass enabled debit card and all I had to do was wave my wallet towards the payment terminal to pay. Or if it was in my coat pocket, just wave my coat at the terminal.

    The overwhelming message from retailers is: Don't think about your money, just spend it! We'll make it easy! Consumers like easy.

    Of course any mobile device manufacturer is all too happy to get involved with that. If banks made cell phones, they would be playing in this space too.

    1. Re:Contactless may be the future, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem with these contactless payments, bigger even than trust, is that it separates you mentally from your money. It makes it easy for people to fail to develop and maintain responsible financial habits. It softens the blow of spending money..

      I am completely opposite. In my mind, paper cash in my wallet is already "spent" money that isn't in my bank account anymore. With my credit\debit card, however, I feel like there is a much more direct link to my bank account. I also get a text message whenever I use these cards, which further reinforces the feeling of spending money.

    2. Re:Contactless may be the future, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an imaginary problem. I'll give little ol' New Zealand as an example of how much of a non-problem it is.

      In NZ, the vast majority of purchases are made via EFTPOS. That's where you swipe a debit card through a slot in a terminal and enter a four-digit PIN to conclude the transaction. Cash still exists, but it's mainly used for small purchases, like bus tickets, or a single cup of coffee, or by children (who generally can't hold a card account) and other dependants. Australia is a similar story, but a few years behind. Aussies still carry cash because a lot of vendors will only allow EFTPOS for transactions over $15.

      What detrimental effects have there been from removing physical cash from New Zealand's consumer culture? Absolutely fucking none. Kiwis are fully aware of how much they're spending because the number shows on the screen of the terminal, with taxes included, and a little printed receipt is available for every single purchase.

      I can totally understand your fear, because you come from a culture where money is represented with physical tokens, and electronic transactions lack those tokens. But now imagine you're a kiwi visiting the US, and you're expected to deal with coins & paper money instead.

      "Seriously? You use physical tokens for commerce, instead of just numbers? Tokens that can be stolen, forged, lost or destroyed? Tokens that can be miscounted, short-changed, refused because 'I can't break that', and that have to be carried to & from an actual bank every other day? Tokens that weigh down your pockets or force you to carry a purse? Tokens that have to be counted & added at every exchange? So you have a bank account, and a wallet, and a jar of coins, and a hidden stash of notes, and you issue & receive those bizarro delayed-action cheques, and they all have different dollar values? How do you keep track? How do you live with such a fractured cognitive separation between you and your money? How do you put up with that kind of inconvenience, every single day?"

  14. OK, Phone payment actually easier. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You state it is no less convenient, but fail to provide a good basis.

    Pretty confused here, it's obviously just as easy to pull out a phone than a credit card.

    Indeed it's slightly easier to pull out a phone since usually a card means pulling out a wallet from which you have to pull a card from a slot.

    The actual physical act of pressing the fingerprint reader is about equal with running a card through a slot, and frankly a little more sure since mag stripe readers are often in a state of failing.

    It's definitely easier than chip + PIN based card because there's no PIN to enter.

    So I guess on further reflection phone payment is at least slightly easier, ranging to much easier.

    I contend the road to phone payments, particularly in the US, will be a longer and rockier one than the hype indicates.

    I don't think you understand how appealing it is once someone sees someone else doing this.

    Not to mention how nice it is to see charges come up in notifications, and be able to see past charges at a glance. Yes you can get that through banking websites or apps but it's actually WAY easier to get a CC into ApplePay than it is to use ANY banking website to get details about your account. How insane is that? The very company that distributes your credit card is incapable of getting your account details visible as easily as Apple can.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:OK, Phone payment actually easier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty confused here, it's obviously just as easy to pull out a phone than a credit card.

      Unless that phone is the behemoth iphone 6 plus.

  15. And now for a demo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We invite Apple on stage and present us with the legal bill for the last lawsuit. I'll place my finger here and with a swipe, I just sent 1 billion dollars to Apple. See how simple it is?

  16. Your rant is 30 years late by rsborg · · Score: 3, Informative

    The biggest problem with these contactless payments, bigger even than trust, is that it separates you mentally from your money. It makes it easy for people to fail to develop and maintain responsible financial habits. It softens the blow of spending money. If that blow doesn't hurt, then you can imagine what happens to the thought of security. The closer you are to the cash, the more you pay attention to its security! Someone takes $20 out of your wallet, you get upset. Someone skims your card, you don't even notice, and if you ever find out, you hope the card company will just reverse the charge. What incentive do you have to care anymore?

    You don't think the same issues happen with cards vs. cash? Yeah, I go through stores already today just putting stuff in the cart, swiping at the checkout, collecting the receipt and never even looking at the bill until well after the fact (and sometimes never even then).

    I manage my budget after the fact - hey that spongecake we bought was completely uneaten - never buy again. That TJs cold-brewed coffee habit is expensive but more cost-effective than buying beans and cleaning out the coffee machine... etc, etc.

    Fact is, cards have already altered our spending habits and contactless does very little to modify that - it's just a nice shinier petina over the same rubric.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  17. The only difference with Apple by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Apple Pay is a fancy term for the EMV payment standard - there's no magic in it, and it's just implementing what the payment industry says is how they want to do it. It's why it "just works" in a lot of stores because the standard was done a while ago and implemented.

    The only difference is that with Apple, it is simple and it works. If you doubt that, then look at how long a lead Google had with Wallet and how as soon as Apple Pay appeared, it's dominated the usage of contactless terminals.

    Sure, Apple pushed it - but if it was a total pain, people wouldn't do it. There's always the fallback of actually using your card.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:The only difference with Apple by adolf · · Score: 1

      Google Wallet is simple from my end-user perspective, and just works with a myriad of different manufacturer's devices, unlike Apple Pay or (presumably) Samsung Pay.

      I've been using it quite a lot lately (perhaps ironically, given TFS) on my Samsung S5. I've had zero issues, except for political clusterfucks like CVS dropping support for Google Wallet soon after Apple Pay was released, and badly-trained Subway clerks who insist on pushing exactly the wrong button on the register when they see me reach for my phone to pay for a meal.

      (And in case anyone was wondering, Google Wallet's NFC functionality is literally just an implementation of Mastercard Paypass, which also uses tokens instead of my actual credit card number.)

  18. Nice try, but the 6 plus still fits in a pocket by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Unless that phone is the behemoth iphone 6 plus.

    The 6 plus fits in my jeans pocket just like every other cell phone I've ever had.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley