Slashdot Mirror


Silk Road Case: Prosecution Reads Alleged Transcript of DPR Arranging 5 Murders

New submitter BenBoy points out an article at Wired about the most recent developments in the trial of Ross Ulbricht, alleged to be the man behind the Silk Road digital black market, going by the alias Dread Pirate Roberts. The prosecution has now rested its case, but one of their last presentations was a series of communications between DPR and a supposed member of the Hell's Angels motorcycle club in which he arranged for hitmen to kill five different people. Wired notes, Ulbricht, who the prosecutors have sought to prove is that Dread Pirate Roberts, hasn't been charged with murder-for-hire in his Southern District of New York case, though he faces charges that include conspiracies to sell narcotics, launder money and more. (He does, however, face murder-for-hire charges in a separate case in Baltimore.) In fact, the prosecution admitted in court that the purported victims of the Silk Road killings were never found, and that Canadian police couldn't even locate records for anyone with their names. ... Even so, the prosecution took pains to read the entire conversation to the jury because it’s intended to show them the darkest side of the Silk Road’s short history. If genuine, the transcript shows that members of the Hell's Angels organization are familiar with using encryption to shield their communications from law enforcement. Forbes has a detailed update on how the rest of the case has progressed, and Ars has a brief article on today's closing arguments.

73 comments

  1. Not really news by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From TFS: If genuine, the transcript shows that members of the Hell's Angels organization are familiar with using encryption to shield their communications from law enforcement.

    Not really news, I seem to recall coming across mention of this (with regards to the Angels) back in the late 90's/early 00's. Not that criminals using codes or ciphers or various other means of obscuring or obfuscating their communications is exactly new in any form.

    1. Re:Not really news by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Informative

      plenty of H.A. are ex-military

    2. Re:Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      plenty of H.A. are ex-military

      So? That doesn't necessarily mean that they are all stupid.

       

    3. Re:Not really news by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      I think that is rubycodez's point -- ex-military might have hands on experience with many kinds of fairly "advanced" stuff (at least from a pedestrian civilian's POV).

    4. Re:Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all intensive porpoises, this is prove positive that encryption is only used by criminals and terrorists. The government should have backdoors in all of the things. Think of the children!

    5. Re:Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was making a funny.

    6. Re:Not really news by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      So? Being in the military doesn't necessarily make you familiar with encryption, or communications, or related security issues.

    7. Re:Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though I take some offense, I'll concede I thought it was pretty well executed.

    8. Re:Not really news by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      From TFS: If genuine, the transcript shows that members of the Hell's Angels organization are familiar with using encryption to shield their communications from law enforcement.

      Yes, that caught my eye as well. I regularly use encryption to send funny cat pictures to my mom. Doesn't mean I'm trying to shield my communications from law enforcement. Hint: I'm trying to circumvent Verizons' shitty spam filters. They simply won't deliver my emails unless I encrypt them.

    9. Re:Not really news by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      never in the military, eh?

    10. Re:Not really news by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

      They are there already there, Hells Angels MC So Cal. Since they are in your neighborhood, would you so kindly express to them that opinion about their masculinity and get back to us on their reactions and analysis of your point of view.

    11. Re:Not really news by fafalone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course Hells Angels and every other large organization is using encryption tech to communicate. But that has nothing to do with anything mentioned in this article or post or even trial.

      It should be obvious to anyone who's even the slightest bit acquainted with scammers. The first thing I did when reading the transcript? Laughed and laughed and laughed since it was so blindingly obvious that lucydrops, FriendlyChemist, and redandwhite were all the same person working a scam. Blackmail (ludicrous to begin with, my ass you have tons of vendors details) not working? "Hi, I'm authorized to contract hits for a major gang! Need some help with your blackmail problem? And of course I don't mind killing the roommates too! It will get you a bulk rate on your hits! Then we'll sell dirt cheap Hells Angel brand drugs and let everyone else benefit from my lack of concern about who I am with!"
      Computer geek without the slightest clue how junkie hustlers work. Would bet anything asking DPR to front that alleged new vendor operation would have been the next step if not for the arrest. Funny stuff. Dudes own personal cash pinata, just keep whacking(!) for shiny bitcoin candy!

    12. Re:Not really news by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      And make sure to leave the camera on for the entire discussion, so investigators have an easier time figuring out exactly what happened.

      Unlike these rude people who made the investigators speculate: http://tech.slashdot.org/story...

    13. Re: Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a contractor for a retired high ranking intelligence officer. He knew they needed security and encryption but that was about as much as he knew. He had zero actual idea on how encryption works etc. We did our best but he's the kind of guy who uses mrbigdick as his password and would stick an usb drive he found in front of his office right into his encrypted laptop...

    14. Re: Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all intents and purposes ffs...

    15. Re: Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mrbigdick doesn't sound like such a bad password, really. Nine letters, no chance it will appear in a dictionary, doesn't appear in the corpus of 4 million+ hacked GMail passwords.

    16. Re: Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus H Christ.

    17. Re:Not really news by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Recording HA intending to give the footage to law enforcement may not be a particular wise life choice.

  2. Pro-tip by tehlinux · · Score: 2

    If someone tells you they are a hitman, that always means they are an undercover agent.

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    1. Re:Pro-tip by Megol · · Score: 2

      Not in this case - given that there's no indication that LE agents was involved at all.

    2. Re:Pro-tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then their cover is working!

    3. Re:Pro-tip by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      how so? given that how much of the case has progressed it wouldn't surprise me if the "hitmen" and the client were LEO. would explain the fake non-existent victims.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Pro-tip by fafalone · · Score: 1, Funny

      If someone tells you they are a hitman, that always means they are an undercover agent.

      Not the one I'm talking to. He's just the dad of the 15 year old that desperately wants my ugly 30 year old friend to come to her house for passionate sex celebrating their true love after they met on #teens4olddudes on irc.LEONet.gov:6667. He asked her if she knew anyone who would murder people too. We're going to meet up with them later at their house, then I'll show you how real it is.

    5. Re:Pro-tip by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows real hitmen call themselves 'cleaners'.

    6. Re:Pro-tip by Megol · · Score: 1

      The most likely explanation was the whole thing was a scheme to extract money from DPR - which succeeded very well.

      DPR will have to face another murder-for-hire case later on but there the hitman was LE and there really was a target. Don't you think it's strange if the one we are discussing was secretly an LE operation - an operation there was never any reason to deny involvement with?!? If anything it would strengthen the other case _and_ make the case of the current trial stronger.

    7. Re: Pro-tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's just smart branding.

    8. Re:Pro-tip by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Or "house painters"

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  3. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The prosecution has now rested its case

    No, it rested yesterday. The defense rested today and closing statements have already been made.

    1. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    2. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I know all about Slashdot being late the party for nearly every story for well over a decade.

  4. Nope by Megol · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If genuine, the transcript shows that members of the Hell's Angels organization are familiar with using encryption to shield their communications from law enforcement.

    No it doesn't. Even if the transcript is genuine (there are no reasons to think it's not) we only know that someone suggested being a hells angels member.

    There's a reason for presenting evidence even though there are no indications that anybody was killed as a result of the logged conversations (and money transfers) and this case not including a conspiracy to commit murder charge - it is to show that the DPR didn't hesitate to use violence to keep control of his criminal enterprise.

  5. Impressive emails by bugs2squash · · Score: 2

    Say what you like about Hell's Angels, but they're clearly not uneducated. The emails are (so far as I can see) well composed, grammatically correct, use proper spelling, indeed they read as if a lawyer wrote them. I don't think many on /. would get past the Angel's written entrance exam (I wouldn't want to try the practical exam).

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:Impressive emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have doubts the HA was for real. Canadian RCMP never made a connection to any actual bodies. I think DPR got burned good on this. The R&W yahoo was probably laughing his ass off when he collected the coins.

    2. Re:Impressive emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The R&W yahoo was probably laughing his ass off when he collected the coins."

      That he may have been, but for this bit of the transcript: "I’ve received the picture and deleted it. Thank you again for your swift action."

      Assuming DPR knew what the guy looked like, the only way to pull that off convincingly would be if the "target" was in on the scam.

    3. Re:Impressive emails by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The entrance exam for the Hells Angels involves the commission of a Felony in front of at least two members. This is how they keep LE out of their organization.

      HA used to control much of the meth production/distribution business in the western US until the Fed's gutted their leadership in the 90's though a well placed undercover that was able to get close to the leadership without joining. They even made a movie about him staring Charlie Sheen that's a pretty good movie though it went straight to tape/dvd.

    4. Re:Impressive emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They even made a movie about him staring Charlie Sheen that's a pretty good movie though it went straight to tape/dvd.

      Beyond the Law

    5. Re:Impressive emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entrance exam for the Hells Angels involves the commission of a Felony in front of at least two members. This is how they keep LE out of their organization.

      Wait? So they think that LE actually cares about following the law themselves?

      Have they lived in a closet the last few decades?

    6. Re:Impressive emails by jandersen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Say what you like about Hell's Angels, but they're clearly not uneducated

      Being intelligent and educated is not in itself proof of moral superiority; indeed, many of the most atrocious individuals throughout history have been highly educated and very intelligent. Just like having a 'faith' or believing in a cause does not make you a better person; in fact, recent reearch has shown that terrorism and similar crimes are most often morally motivated - ie. these are people who have thought about things and made a moral choice about what they are doing.

      I am not anti-intellectual, but I think it is important to understand this. On one hand, academic education is not enough - we must include moral education as well; but on the other hand, we must also break the religious monopoly on morality. Good morality makes excellent sense from a logical point of view, in that it pro-social; religion at best makes no difference, but is more likely to make people less moral because it can legitimise an 'us vs them' view on the world.

    7. Re:Impressive emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me thinks the target was undercover....that would explain how he did not "exist" according to authorities. Fake name, address, etc.

    8. Re:Impressive emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a comment - most people, with any brains, would ever admit to murder online (or anywhere else). That's why most of the conversation isn't believable.

    9. Re:Impressive emails by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of how LE feels about following the law if they commit a felony whilst undercover they can kiss any prosecution of anyone other than the agent goodbye, especially if there are witnesses (hence the 2 independent witness requirement).

      Law enforcement can commit misdemeanors and minor crimes while engaged in undercover work but they cannot commit felonies. The typical situation would be to deny the felony took place but with two witnesses they will have a hard time convincing anyone of that. Keep in mind that felonies are generally very serious crimes that usually have jail time associated with them and commission of one while an officer of the court (LE's are considered officers of the court which means their testimony is given higher weight than someone elses) generally blows all credibility.

      After nearly two decades of trying to get evidence against the hells angels they only succeeded because they were able to get someone close to the organization without actually joining by pretending to be from another club. Not only that but the undercover was able to get close to the leader of the HA so they were able to take down almost all of the leadership at the time.

  6. Even less surprising .... by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

    Even less surprising, considering that they're a registered corporation; with a big business in merchandising.

    And most corporations use VPNs, etc.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11...

  7. Existence of hitman? by CODiNE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm curious, has anyone ran the conversations from FriendlyChemist and Redandwhite through one of those grammar analyzing programs to see the likelihood that they're the same person? It looks fairly likely that DPR may have been scammed by someone wholly unconnected to the trial. $650k is quite a lot to make just sending a few emails around.

    Also it should be possible to trace both bitcoin wallets and see if there's any overlap between them.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Existence of hitman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The murders-for-hire looked like a big con job, and that was something to be glad about. “We don’t think those murders took place,” said Howard. “Thank God it did not work out.”

      Wait, so even the prosecution (Tim Howard) doesn't believe the murders took place?

    2. Re:Existence of hitman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      The murders-for-hire looked like a big con job, and that was something to be glad about. “We don’t think those murders took place,” said Howard. “Thank God it did not work out.”

      Wait, so even the prosecution (Tim Howard) doesn't believe the murders took place?

      Of course. This has been a scam from end to end. Parallel construction, mass surveillance, set ups, all justified to win the war on drugs. There isn't any accountability so why not.

    3. Re:Existence of hitman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, exactly, makes you think bitcoin is traceable?

    4. Re:Existence of hitman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The roughly 28 GB publicly-circulated ledger of every bitcoin transaction ever conducted?

    5. Re:Existence of hitman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moderation fail - the above is a legitimate and reasonable comment (I did not post it) - the moderation model here is badly broken and consistently abused.

    6. Re:Existence of hitman? by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

      nope. nobody believes that any murders happened.
      it's just to paint DPR as a bad guy to the jury. nothing else. why claim it in charges then? because the US justice system is full of bullshit and making up charges and then using those as threat to settle to lesser charges. what you're guilty of is then somewhere in the middle, perhaps.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Existence of hitman? by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

      They're not charging him with the "murders". The government used it in their closing arguments as evidence towards his character, just as how his defense will deny up and down that he's DPR in their closing.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    8. Re:Existence of hitman? by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

      ...never mind

      "Ulbricht's own lawyer admitted during opening statements that his client created the site. "There's no dispute it was used to sell drugs," said Turner. 'There's no dispute when the defendant was arrested, he was logged in as Dread Pirate Roberts.'"

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    9. Re:Existence of hitman? by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, it's like someone on trial for murder, who has a lawyer that says "now, I'm not saying my client didn't murder the victim but someone else could have done it too, amiright?"

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
  8. Re: seventh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows 10!

  9. Professionals and amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The transcript was a fascinating read. In my opinion it reveals two truths: Hell's Angels are just as professional and businesslike as the mob (or at least, how it used to be), and DPR seems to be living out a fantasy from the latest Scorsese film. "work him over" indeed. I wonder if Redandwhite was secretly ROTFL all the way to the bank. Still a shame that people lost their lives, no matter how sleezy they were.

    1. Re:Professionals and amateurs by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised "Redandwhite" offered to accept a 6-digit payment in bitcoins just like that, as his first ever payment. That should throw up big red FAKE flags to anyone.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  10. Perhaps .... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    But I've also read a fair bit of commentary (mostly from libertarian types who see some red flags about government taking Silk Road down), claiming the murder for hire claims are completely fabricated by the Feds, in order to get a stronger conviction.

    That would seem to be a possibility worth considering, at the very least. (It's not too difficult to see some parallels in the lengths they've gone to, trying to punish Kim DotCom as severely as possible.)

    Personally, I maintain that, really, the only big issue with Silk Road (both 1 and 2) was the effort made to create item categories that clearly proved the site operators knowingly/willingly facilitated transactions that would be illegal in the country they lived in. I rather like and support the idea of a big, anonymous marketplace -- but I think you have to approach such a thing so you're essentially a "common carrier". Nobody files charges against the phone company for providing a number to someone using it to make illegal drug deals, right? And nobody files charges against the mailman who actually delivers the illegal goods that someone purchases online. That's because we understand they're just doing a job of moving content around, and have no reasonable way to know what that content consists of.

    1. Re:Perhaps .... by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

      Wait, people use the USPS to receive illegal goods in the mail? Isn't that stupid. Not only is it a federal offense to mail illegal goods through the USPS, but they have the right to open your packages. Isn't that like the easiest way to get caught dealing drugs? I mean, the package has your name on it, or it least your address. What are you going to do, say you're holding it for a friend?

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
  11. Sheesh! I thought Reiser had a bad defense... by sirwired · · Score: 0

    When this weak sauce is all you can come up with for a defense, why, oh why, would you not plead out?

    "I made the site, but I left (but came back just in time for the FBI to catch me.)" Yeah, that's really going to sway a jury.

    1. Re:Sheesh! I thought Reiser had a bad defense... by Macman408 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They might not have offered him a deal, or he might've been too stupid to take it. The prosecution apparently accused him of thinking he's too smart to be convicted (speaking of Hans Reiser...), and Ars Technica had an Op-Ed speculating that he might not be taking the advice of his lawyer as much as he should be - or his lawyer isn't doing a good job.

      Reading Ars Technica's great day-by-day coverage of the trial, I think the prosecution has probably done a great job of tying up all the evidence in a beautiful package for the jury, while the defense laid out a haphazard tale meant to distract and confuse the jury. This is exactly what happened when I served on a jury a couple years ago - maybe 3 of the people on the jury were somewhat swayed by the defense's arguments, but after a little deliberation, the rest of us convinced those 3 that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

      I think the defense attorney probably did his job here in trying to confuse things - but seeing how the evidence was presented in Ars's articles, I think that he'd have to get really lucky with the jury to get an acquittal at this point.

    2. Re:Sheesh! I thought Reiser had a bad defense... by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      As a follow up, I saw something today after the verdict was announced that quoted his attorney; apparently the pre-trial negotiations didn't offer anything meaningful in terms of a reduced sentence if he were to plead guilty, so they didn't take it.

  12. Yes, a veteran. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    USN Submarine Service, 1981-1991.

  13. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you outlaw encryption, only outlaws will use encryption.

  14. Totally out of his league by hairykrishna · · Score: 1

    Everything from the trial just reinforces my first impressions that Ulbricht was attempting to operate a site for which he simply didn't have the skill set. The 'murder' plot was an incredibly obvious scam to separate him from his cash. I'm astonished that any reasonably intelligent person would be taken by it. His op security was appalling. If the might of the DEA, and whatever other three letter agencies they can rope in, is hunting you then you need to be a lot more careful than he was. Having a full local site backup on your bedside table? Using the same laptop you log in to your admin account for anything else? Stupid. Keeping a fucking diary? There are no words.

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  15. I'm talking 'bout balls deep! by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

    Has the government had anyone by the balls as the do Ulbricht, I don't think so. It just keeps getting worse for this guy. I'm pretty sure they'll probably throw some child-porn charges in there for good measure. This guy is fucked, fucked, fucked. And will get fucked (in prison)!

    --
    This Sig does not Exist.
  16. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can't outlaw it cause how would secure games, and transactions occur..aha
    and thus you would simply have "outlaws" in those companies doing stuff and less would be seen.