Slashdot Mirror


Google Earth Pro Now Available Free

HughPickens.com writes Google has long offered a Pro version of Google Earth for $399 per year that includes some pretty cool extras not found in the free version. Now Rick Broida reports at Cnet that you can get Google Earth Pro absolutely free. All you have to do is download the installer, run it, then sign in using your e-mail address (as your username) and license code GEPFREE. Features include: Advanced measurements: Measure parking lots and land developments with polygon area measure, or determine affected radius with circle measure; High-resolution printing: Print images up to 4,800 x 3,200 pixel resolution; Exclusive pro data layers with Demographics and traffic count; Spreadsheet import: Ingest up to 2,500 addresses at a time, assigning place marks and style templates in bulk; and Movie-Maker: Export Windows Media and QuickTime HD movies, up to 1,920x1,080-pixel resolution. If you've ever been involved in a property dispute, you'll know how acrimonious they can get. Google Earth Pro includes parcel data that definitively defines property boundaries. "Do you really need this? Probably not, as Pro was created with business/enterprise users in mind," writes Broida. "Let's be honest, [Google Earth Pro has] entertainment value that's virtually impossible to measure."

117 comments

  1. Re:/. deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What part of "close and don't show me this again" don't you understand? 3rd week in a row now I've see that crap pop up. I hope this isn't going to be a nightmare like it was with /. beta plaguing everyone.

    If you keep clearing your cookies, it will keep popping up. Idiot.

  2. A week late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are we waiting for?

    1. Re:A week late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "GEPFREE" password wasn't announced, and there were issues with the licensing site

  3. Re:/. deals by zidium · · Score: 2

    I see that bloody Slashdot Deals stupid posting so many times I just autoclick it away now :-/

    --
    Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
  4. Free?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That can only mean they're going to kill it as a money loser.

    1. Re:Free?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So just because their ad-riddled strategy doesn't work in the geospatial market, they decide to destroy all the competition too by giving away their full product for free, so they can get a second go at it. Nice move, dickheads. Disclaimer: I work for the competition.

    2. Re:Free?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're opening the gates on Google Earth Pro, as it's stuck in the middle between Google Earth and Google Earth EC (Enterprise Client). Those who need enterprise features go with EC, and those who don't can now save high-res maps, which makes us happy.

    3. Re:Free?! by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If their product wasn't crushing you at $400, it won't crush you at free.

      $400 is not a lot of money for the enterprise market, I'm shocked it was so cheap.

    4. Re:Free?! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      High-priced products are a corporatist conspiracy.

      Free products are a corporatist conspiracy.

      This is starting to sound like when the Church of Warminetics predicts that carbon warming will cause flooding and droughts.

    5. Re:Free?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      and those in the us can go to the usgs national map viewer and download high res orthoimagery (aerial imagery modified to the correct coordinates unlike google earth) for most of the us for free already. and it includes other interesting data sets like elevation, ground cover etc.

    6. Re:Free?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      LOL, http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/... must be getting hammered right now. It done got /. to death.

    7. Re:Free?! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Not understanding the scientific method isn't something you should be proud of...

    8. Re:Free?! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Scientists are not the ones who predict flooding and drought at the same time. Political activists acting in their name do.

    9. Re:Free?! by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying it is impossible to have flooding near the coast and drought inland at the same time? The world is bigger than your back yard.

    10. Re:Free?! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Of course, but that's not what the Church of Warminetics predicts. It predicts that the world will be devastated by drought and by flood at the same time.

    11. Re:Free?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Just thought you should know that.

    12. Re:Free?! by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      It is. Just some months ago, flooding from Hurricane Sandy caused massive devastation at the same time as drought was (and still is) devastating parts of California. Apparently this Church of Warminetics knows what they're talking about; you should stop fighting and join them :)

    13. Re:Free?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are stupefyingly stupid.
       
        That is all.

  5. Utility by Iamthecheese · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just as Google Maps and friends has saved millions of man-hours and probably hundreds of millions of dollars from people not being lost sufficiently wide adoption and awareness of these advanced features may save an immense amount of temporal and fiscal expense.

    Common usage combined with other services can, for example, create self-aware communities, allow public input for city planning, resolve boundary arguments, help individuals planning to, for example, install a swimming pool, and provide data for planning crop layouts.And that's just off the top of my very non-expert head. I think the implications of this are far broader than may be immediately recognized.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Utility by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was able to prove out just now that the speed hump my friend in highschool's parents had the city put in front of their house isn't justified - the neighborhood street in front of our house had way more traffic and was only half a mile from them.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:Utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common usage combined with other services can, for example, create self-aware communities, allow public input for city planning, resolve boundary arguments, help individuals planning to, for example, install a swimming pool, and provide data for planning crop layouts.And that's just off the top of my very non-expert head. I think the implications of this are far broader than may be immediately recognized.

      If it gives us back the Wikipedia layer that I actually used in Google Maps (up until some UX fucktard removed it in the name of "minimalism"), I'll use GEPro over Maps any day.

    3. Re:Utility by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was able to prove out just now that the speed hump my friend in highschool's parents had the city put in front of their house isn't justified - the neighborhood street in front of our house had way more traffic and was only half a mile from them.

      Speed humps aren't justified at all, but the justification used is that they make people slow down, not that they make them choose another route. One ways make people choose another route. Speed humps just make people buy crossovers. Then they can comfortably drive over them at speed, and the only people who suffer are people who don't buy cars which are excessively tall.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Free?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Between this, and the deprecation of Google Maps Engine (http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2015/01/google-maps-engine-deprecated.html), its pretty obvious that Google has decided to exit the enterprise geospatial market. They've never really succeeded in this market; it makes sense to focus engineering efforts where they can succeed.

  7. Hyperbole by ohnocitizen · · Score: 4, Funny

    The prevalence of hyperbole in modern journalism is virtually impossible to measure.

    1. Re:Hyperbole by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Like there is a google of it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Hyperbole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like there is a google of it.

      Googol.

  8. Just FYI, it does work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I did a malware scan (3 common engines) on the file and it checks out, the thing works for free.

    1. Re:Just FYI, it does work. by retroworks · · Score: 1

      Agree, I just spent about 30 minutes cruising around some sites overseas I was not able to see as clearly with online Maps.google.com

      Put me in a good mood. It's really nice and I appreciate someone putting the link in the summary.

      --
      Gently reply
    2. Re:Just FYI, it does work. by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      I did a malware scan (3 common engines) on the file and it checks out, the thing works for free.

      Well, I'm not touching that one with a ten foot pole.

      If you've ever been involved in a property dispute, you'll know how acrimonious they can get.

      The way it's worded, it looks like it's bait for the Palestinians or the North Koreans to install.

  9. Re:/. deals by NemoinSpace · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot deals is at least as valuable to me as Amazon and e-bay. In fact it has a few added benefits of only display things of relative geekiness that might interest me, rather than Amazon who tend to display every related item i might have ever clicked on in the last 5 years. Also Slashdot deals will show you prices that guarantee you can buy the same item somewhere else for 20% less.
    Neither do i disable advertising. Flooding the internet with my inane preference tracking cookies to be stored and backed up on hundreds of servers is the surest way to overwhelm the probabilistic failure rate of raid 6 and force manufactures back to offering 5 year warranties standard. - C'mon people, help keep Slashdot free - Clickit!

  10. parcel data that definitively unreliable by UziBeatle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    parcel data that definitively defines property boundaries.

      BOGUS statement.

      As soon as I downloaded this I zoomed in on the area
    I live in (somewhere in N. Galveston CO. , Texas)
    and saw immediately the property lines were wrong.

    Not by a small margin either. All property lines along
    the road I live along were shifted by offset of around 20 to 30 feet.

      A further look at neighboring streets showed similar
    offsets.

      In the linked article to the story the blog clown stated
    this wondrous GM Pro could cheaply solve property disputes (or words to that effect).

        Yah, right. Nope. Might cause trouble but not a tool to cheaply determine property boundaries.

    Unreliable, therefor useless.

      Anyone else care to check theirs? I imagine it varies region to region how useful it is but bottom line if wrong in this area it is most likely wrong in other far flung areas.

    --
    Something between the lines jumps out and bites your arm off. Soltan Gris / London
    1. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The truth is that the definitions of the property boundaries are exactly accurate, i.e., 100' N/S and 50' E/W. The issue is that how the surface features interact with those property boundaries is only an approximation.

      I work daily with this using a GIS systems. We have a custom-crafted map where an expert spent a lot of time doing what's called "rubber-sheeting", meaning stretching and squeezing the photo layer to make it line up as closely as possible with the lot lines layer, and it's still plus or minus a few feet, more than enough to preclude using it to settle a property dispute.

      The ONLY way to settle a boundary dispute is to hire a surveyor. Be precise in what you want, you want a boundary line located, you do NOT want a "survey" which is more more complicated and much more expensive.

    2. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      spot on for me in BFE Wisconsin.

    3. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My experience in the engineering field is that GE parcel boundaries are crap and never used. Even the parcel boundaries obtained from ESRI databases are not trusted. Instead the ESRI boundaries are used as approximate to determine if a property owner may be affected by a project.

      If exact boundaries are needed, a the only way to identify a boundary is by having a surveyor go out and mark the boundaries in question. All other sources are "cartoons", as a local surveyor likes to put it.

      On another note about poor quality GE data, even the GE surface (elevation) data is not to be trusted in engineering. The resolution is poor and can be off by up to 15m. Often a USGS DEM is used as the first pass, then LiDAR data is collected where high resolution elevations are needed.

    4. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by Bobberly · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a data custodian for our county cadastral data I can attest that using the data for ANY purpose other than tax assessments is not recommended. Parcel data is meant to track ownership. It is not meant to be an accurate representation of survey data. It never has, and never will. Just because it "looks" ok when you overlay it with an aerial photo doesn't mean it should be used for any determination of property lines. This is why every time you buy a house a professional surveyor comes out and re-checks everything. We all know the house didn't move, but surveyors can't even agree on a the same location of a corner marker. Where do you think all this error goes when you try and do a countywide fabric of parcels? For a kick, ask your county assessor for the parcel line data.. including COGO attributes. Then look in amazement as your 120 foot property line is actually 118.5 feet on the map to make it fit inside of decades of mapping error. I've tried to reach out to Google many times to offer an update of our data to reflect new subdivisions. I never got a response. The product looks pretty and functional until you actually try and do something that matters with it.

    5. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      several feet off from a surveyed corner here in MS...

    6. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by Dereck1701 · · Score: 3, Informative

      " Then look in amazement as your 120 foot property line is actually 118.5 feet on the map"

      Even surveyors can be off by that much, I've seen surveys in the 80s that when resurveyed with modern equipment the surveyor has to note on his map something to the effect of "Measured: 121.51' Recorded as: 119.2'". That said you are very right using electronic parcel maps for "definitive property boundaries" is completely idiotic. They can be a good reference depending on how they were built but it will be a LONG time (think a century or so) before there is any chance of them being used for property boundary determination.

    7. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Mine in VA shows up shifted about 3-4 ft. away from the street, and overlapping the neighbor (opposite side) by a similar amount.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    8. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by bigtreeman · · Score: 2

      Every day I go to different locations for work on major and minor roads. I look up Google most nights and apart from recent development work everything is right where it should be. Including boundaries, power poles, storm drain access covers, pits, substations, railings, pram ramps, gutters, condition and width of shoulders. I can even look up power poles and get an idea of fittings and condition. Too bad for you Boo Boo, it's bloody great for me.

      --
      Go well
    9. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen surveys in the 80s that when resurveyed with modern equipment the surveyor has to note on his map something to the effect of "Measured: 121.51' Recorded as: 119.2'".

      Do you really use decimal places for measurements in feet?

    10. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, standard practice.

    11. Re: parcel data that definitively unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have been measuring properties in sub-foot increments for hundreds of years, why would they round to the nearest foot now? If you look at some old property descriptions you'll see what are called "Chains", "Rods" and "Links". A Chain is equivalent to 66 ft, a Rod is equivalent to 16.5 ft and a Link is 0.66 ft. Heck in some cases they would subdivide the units, for example saying "5 chains, 3 and 69/100 Links" which would be about 332.4354'. How they thought that trudging through the woods with a length of chain would be anywhere near that accurate I'll never understand but they did it all the same.

  11. Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sadly not Linux.

    1. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      WINE.

    2. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by green1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As usual though, this requires more than just wine, it also requires tricking google in to thinking you have windows in the first place just to be allowed to download it. If you go to the site with a linux machine it downloads the normal google earth for linux, and doesn't let you download the PC version. (I'm guessing a user agent change would fix this, but it's yet one more hoop you have to jump through that shouldn't be necessary.)

    3. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1, Troll

      All you Linux people do is complain.

      Sheesh.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by rabbin · · Score: 4, Informative

      This installed for me over WINE http://dl.google.com/earth/cli...

      However certain things like the search function are not working for me.

    5. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My download click auto-picked linux as the OS.

    6. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing I don't have any mods points or you'd be -.

    7. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by easyTree · · Score: 3, Funny

      All you Linux people do is WINE.

      Sheesh.

    8. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Linux is not really meant to be a desktop OS

      Unforutnately, you are right. My main machine is Linux (Ubuntu 12.04) since over 5 years, and it is indeed not comparable to WinXP/Win7 or Mac OS X. I still prefer it for various reasons, but would not recommend it to most people as a desktop OS.

      There might be a Google Earth for Android and iOS some day, but probably never for Linux. Sad...

    9. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by squash_me_quickly · · Score: 2

      "Linux is not really meant to be a desktop OS."....tell that to Valve. They only "relatively recently" releases Steam, 'Counter Strike' and 'Left 4 Dead 2'.

      Despite that "Linux is not really meant to be a desktop OS.",(in my highly unscientific test of 3 computers) the few games that are made for Linux all work MUCH better in Linux(on the computers I tested) than their Windows counterparts.

      And yes, to give Windows a fair chance... I did turn off updates, the anti-virus, anti-spyware, the firewall, and any other program that could by slowing Windows down. I did not remember to disable the webserver, ftp server, or any other software which I have running in Linux.

    10. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The few games I've tried in Linux have mixed results compared to their Windows versions:

      Doom 3 is a bitch to get working properly. Not only do you need to launch with specific paramaters to make it work properly on PulseAudio, it has a very annoying stutter if you're not running it with vsync (which you shouldn't if you value not having input lag).

      FTL has a known issue with its sound system middleware (libbass) when running on Linux - either it crashes the game at a random time or the sound cuts out. There are a few potential workarounds but it's never been definitely fixed.

      Pure open source games like Red Eclipse, Xonotic and a bunch other which treat Linux as a same-tier platform to Windows work perfectly, and in the case of Xonotic actually faster in Linux. It seems that games which treat Linux as a second-level system like the first two don't work as swimmingly as they do in Windows.

      As for Valve-specific games, I refuse to use Steam anymore because I don't want to have to rely on a single vendor for almost all my gaming (with the potential for account lockout and them changing their terms in such a way that they retain even more control than I'm comfortable with), so I haven't tried them.

    11. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      "Linux is not really meant to be a desktop OS."....tell that to Valve. They only "relatively recently" releases Steam, 'Counter Strike' and 'Left 4 Dead 2'.

      Valve has business reasons for tossing token support to Linux, to keep the fire under Microsoft's seat, since the new Windows Store competes directly with Steam.

      Despite that "Linux is not really meant to be a desktop OS.",(in my highly unscientific test of 3 computers) the few games that are made for Linux all work MUCH better in Linux(on the computers I tested) than their Windows counterparts.

      As you say, "unscientific", since I could report the reverse and our anecdotal evidence just counters each other.

      Windows has more than 90% of the desktop OS market, OS X has about 6%, Linux has between 1% and 3% depending on the source, and the rest is other.

      That speaks for itself, IMHO... Windows works fine, I keep hearing all these wonderful things about Linux, I've used Linux as a server OS for many years, but it is a pretty crappy desktop OS when it comes to desktop applications.

      The primary point put forward by most of the Linux on the desktop people is, "it isn't Windows". That is not a good enough reason, just hating on Windows is not going to get any traction, it has to do something better.

    12. Re: Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Probably not, on fixed location computational devices, no. On mobile computational devices, which outnumber fixed ones and appear to be replacing them? Let's see you fire that smart mouth off on that side of things.

    13. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 is not really meant to be a desktop OS. Yes, yes, you can use it as such, just as you can use Windows Server as a desktop OS.

      But... you shouldn't...

      Run OS X on a Mac, that is really the only desktop OS on the market... at least until windows 10 comes along.

    14. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porche is not really meant to be a commuter car. Yes, yes, you can use it as such, just as you can use a GM Hummer as a commuter car.

      But.... you shouldn't...

      Don't like Chevrolet? Fine, run Ford or Chrysler, those are really the only three commuter cars on the market...

      - if Google were not run on open source software and were not using open source software in their development I could see them playing that Windows-only or even Mac game but WTF Google? Was that you who made that dumb ass statement about Linux not being meant to be a desktop OS?

    15. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There might be a Google Earth for Android and iOS some day, but probably never for Linux. Sad...

      That's a really weird thing to say. I've been using the Linux version of Google Earth since 2007.

    16. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, quit complaining about their complaining.

    17. Re:Mac and Windows PC only. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Was there a reason why Google didn't make a Linux port? Their free version exists, but not for Pro? :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  12. Linux version??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Where the FUCK is it???
    Seriously, how much would it cost you to produce Linux versions of all your shit? .001% of your revenue??
    Here's a pro tip...design your shit to be portable from the start. I can do it and I'm a one man team for fuck sake!
    And put GWT debugging support back into the Linux version of Chrome you cheapskate assholes.

    1. Re:Linux version??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They use Linux on all their servers, they build Android on top of Linux, but they can't be bothered giving back Linux support on their products.
      How pathetic is that?

    2. Re:Linux version??? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why make a Linux version when Linux is simply not enough of a market to be worth serving?

      Yes, they use Linux to run their servers, it is a great server OS. It sucks as a desktop OS.

    3. Re:Linux version??? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Look! If I hold his head at just the right angle and look way in the back - a chipped molar!"

    4. Re:Linux version??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use Linux on all their servers, they build Android on top of Linux, but they can't be bothered giving back Linux support on their products.
      How pathetic is that?

      Um, AOSP? Chromium? What rock are you living under?

    5. Re:Linux version??? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      It's set to be released in the year of the Linux desktop.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    6. Re:Linux version??? by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      Yes, they should support all their products on every platform all the time, no matter how tiny the marketshare, and no matter how tiny the revenue stream, compared to the revenue from their core advertising products.

      After all, Google is a non-profit semi-governmental organization that is only designed to do things for the common good in the fairest-seeming possible way. Also, I don't think that the Google employees themselves will mind being pulled off their current Android embedded Linux project, or their Autonomous car project, or their server-side project, to start working on this major piece of critical revenue-generating Google Earth Linux-client infrastructure. Developers are just like sheep. Just push them towards a new different direction each week, and they'll gladly follow that new direction until you tell them otherwise. That's how obedient they are.

    7. Re:Linux version??? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You can't give a pro tip when you're an amateur.

      It's not up to Google to do your bidding, or even spend $.01, much less .001% of revenue on you or your ilk. They're a business, and it's businesses job to make money, not to cater to some whiny jackass.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    8. Re:Linux version??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is perfectly good as a desktop OS. (Well, good enough - you can argue about sound support, or systemd, or whatever, but there are plenty of non-optimum things in other OSes that you could equally argue about.) It's not perfectly good *on* the desktop but that's not because of the OS, it's because of availability of commonly required software (MS Office, various industry-specific tools (for the workplace desktop), various games (for the home desktop).

      I would, though, absolutely recommend it as a desktop for my elderly parents. LibreOffice is perfectly good for the office tasks they want to do and interoperability with MS is "close enough" for the people they need to interoperate with (mainly friends, simple business documents (presentations and text files mainly)). My dad can run an ancient version of WordStar in a FreeDOS window (historical research, legacy document format...) and it's relatively un-targeted by viruses, especially if Flash is turned off.

  13. if it's really free.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you wouldn't need to sign in to use the code or the program.. it's a locally installed application that pulls DATA off the internet.. there's no need to require a login unless someone wants to save their own data to 'the cloud' for access on different computer. just sayin... google finds value in compiling, analyzing, and storing forever, data relating to your use of the application, like everything else they offer for free or not... there is a price to pay regardless.

  14. DL Link by rea1l1 · · Score: 3, Informative
  15. Gigapixel map printing by labnet · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to be able to print super detailed gigapixel maps, but not found any up to date tools to do the stitching. It's a pity pro still limits the resolution so much.

    --
    46137
    1. Re:Gigapixel map printing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the limit now?

  16. Direct Download Link for Windows by rea1l1 · · Score: 0

    dl.google.com/earth/client/advanced/current/GoogleEarthProWin.exe

    1. Re:Direct Download Link for Windows by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      dl.google.com/earth/client/advanced/current/GoogleEarthProWin.exe

      Very nice, only requires a handle and the code, reading About Google Earth it is indeed PRO.

  17. Re:/. deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real idiot is someone who assumes that an avid reader of a tech site doesn't know what a cookie is. Idiot.

  18. Re:/. deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally respect they want to offer tech-centric deals just as much as I'd hope they respect I'm disinterested in them. (and ironically my captcha for this post is "profits")

  19. Re:Mac and "PC" only. by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2

    It says "Mac and PC" (not "Windows PC") - we've been complaining for years that "PC" doesn't mean "Windows PC", looks like Google for once got the message.

    When you click through you do get a "GoogleEarthLinux.bin", or at least, I did. (downloaded on x86_64/Arch Linux/Firefox)

    I haven't tried it yet, so I don't know yet if it actually WORKS (unlike the previous version of "regular" Google Earth for me) but it looks like they are handing out Linux versions.

  20. Re:Mac and "PC" only...oh, I see. by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 4, Insightful
    UPDATE: Oh, I see what you mean. Instead of honestly saying "Huh? Linux? What's that? We've forgotten!", Google is quietly sending Linux users a copy of the previous version (6.0.something) of the "free" Google Earth (that's what's in the "GoogleEarthLinux.bin" file), and appears not to have bothered with Google Earth Pro.

    I knew I shouldn't have put my pitchfork and torch away so quickly. Friggin' Google. As much as I love playing with maps, Google can take a long walk off a short pier - I'm not desperate enough for their "product" to mess around with WINE.

  21. Idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No cookies here and no Javascript. Still, I don't know what popup the OP is talking about *and* I don't get to see Beta. Bliss!

  22. Earth = USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Typical of americans, Google Earth pro, but the pro features are only for USA,

  23. The Mac OS X version is unsigned. by psergiu · · Score: 1

    The Mac OS X version is a unsigned binary. On the newer OS X versions you have to go to System Preferences -> Security & Privacy to allow-it to run.
    Looks like Google was too cheap to shell $99/year for a OS X Developer account and get a developer key to sign a product they asked $399 for.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    1. Re:The Mac OS X version is unsigned. by CraigParticle · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is surprising, I agree.

      An alternate suggestion if you want to keep the existing System Preferences: right-click ('ctrl-click') on the binary to bring up the context menu, then select 'Open". This will invoke the same warning, but will also allow you to authenticate -- allowing this binary to run (here and thereafter) without complaining.

    2. Re:The Mac OS X version is unsigned. by __aapopf3474 · · Score: 2
      Getting the OS X Developer account through legal would probably be a nightmare.

      Heck, even reviewing the agreement is difficult.

      1. 1. https://developer.apple.com/io... does not render under Firefox.
      2. 2. For the individual program, you can't look at the agreement without giving them a credit card.
      3. 3. For the corporate program, you have to attest that you can sign agreements for the company before seeing the agreement.
      4. 4. Profit! (Sorry, I always wanted to do that)

      Does the Mac OS License include the onerous section that is in the IOS developer agreement about making public statements? See the EFF All Your Apps Are Belong to Apple: The iPhone Developer Program License Agreement page.

      As I can't review the agreement without either giving them a credit card number or committing fraud, I can't seem to find out.

      Certificates do not have much value, especially for smaller firms. Say an app from a smaller vendor or an individual is signed, but turns out to be malicious. What's Apple going to do, other than revoke the cert and try not to give that vendor or individual a cert in the future?

      That said, I'm glad it is possible to download Google Earth without enabling automatic updates. I downloaded GE in January and there was no way to run it without automatic updates running. I removed Chrome because it automatically updates. I need a bit more control over my machine than that.

    3. Re:The Mac OS X version is unsigned. by psergiu · · Score: 1

      They already have Apple Developer accounts that they use to publish all those apps in the iOS App Store. So Google Legal is okay with those terms.
      And it's not some unknown developer, it's Google for fsck's sake. I bet if they just email Apple they'll instantly get a key.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  24. Just wasted 2 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just wasted 2 hours globe trotting with my mouse

  25. Re:/. deals by grcumb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What part of "close and don't show me this again" don't you understand? 3rd week in a row now I've see that crap pop up. I hope this isn't going to be a nightmare like it was with /. beta plaguing everyone.

    If you keep clearing your cookies, it will keep popping up. Idiot.

    No, it appears to be the kind of cookie they're using. Every time I restart my browsers, I see this advertisement again. Clearly, the cookie is only being set for the session. Also, why the fuck is this not stored in the database, instead of in the cookie? It's trivially easy to associate this with the logged-in userid. Now, this is Slashdot, so odds are good that we can attribute this to incompetence rather than malice. But....

    ... But they also keep showing this to users (like myself) who have taken them up on their own offer to turn advertising off, which is really fucking stupid. As I wrote elsewhere, 'I probably wouldn't have cared about Slashdot Deals anyway, but now I fucking hate it. It's that asshole creep at the bar that won't leave your friend alone.'

    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  26. Speaking of revenue by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Seriously, how much would it cost you to produce Linux versions of all your shit? .001% of your revenue??

    And the fact that it would produce in return .0000001% of their revenue does not matter?

    Or in fact some negative number - it's hard to imagine even a single engineer working for six months could be paid for by the sales from a Linux version.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  27. Re:/. deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I see it every week too - no clearing cookies or anything. Just bugs here.

  28. Re:/. deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Stylish because is very handy for stuff like this. If you use Firefox add this:

    @namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

    @-moz-document domain("slashdot.org") {
            div#sitenotice {
            display: none !important;
        }
    }

    for Chrome:

    div#sitenotice {
            display: none !important;
    }

  29. Your phone number by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    I posted a few days ago how everybody is after your phone number this to a Facebook article of picking one out of a crowd. While avoiding it all this time, Google Earth Pro requires it.

  30. And... by duck_rifted · · Score: 1

    Now, Sketchup Pro, please Google. See, the difference between Sketchup Pro for hundreds of dollars and Sketchup Pro for free is that if it's free, people will use it instead of just using Blender. The only value to Sketchup is that it has a simpler interface. Anything created in it that will find its way into any kind of simulation or electronic entertainment will still have to be touched up in another program. Nobody is going to pay hundreds of dollars just to prototype slightly faster, but the demand for simple assets is much greater than the tiny market of architects and designers who currently use it.

    I mean, I guess Google could just leave it as-is, and Sketchup can continue to be another not-search offering by Google that goes mostly ignored. But if they want to get away from search then they need to analyze markets more effectively on the demand side. A legion of modders and hobbyist developers are backed into using the whopping grand total of exactly one useful modelling program that doesn't cost your firstborn child and eternal soul to obtain a license for. The fact that Sketchup costs less for having fewer features does not make up for the fact that it is still drastically overpriced. Especially for its lack of features.

    Maya. 3DSMax. Blender. Where does Sketchup fit in, under its current pricing?

    1. Re:And... by caseih · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sketchup Pro is not a Google product, so begging Google to release it for free is not likely to go anywhere. Now why Trimble bought Sketchup from Google in the first place I'll never know. Setting up Google Earth Pro to be free *before* Google sells it off is probably a good move for users. Too bad they didn't do that with Sketchup before they sold it.

    2. Re:And... by duck_rifted · · Score: 1

      Wow, they sold it back in 2012! And the last time I read anything about it was only a few months ago. I still saw conversation about Google buying it. And I bet Trimble is letting it sit around for passive income.

      I'd be very surprised if they sell Google Earth, but you're right. The next owner would need to build on it to start charging again.

    3. Re:And... by duck_rifted · · Score: 2

      Correction to my previous post: Trimble is still updating Sketchup. They just released a new version. gogo Twilight Zone effect. That's good news though!

  31. Go cheap, lose your property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So, in other words, if I'm having a property dispute especially one involving the court system, I DO want a survey. When court is involved, the person who's being cheap is the one who tends to lose. Ask all those people who thought they were smart enough to defend themselves in court, or who thought the court-provided lawyer was actually going to do anything.

    1. Re:Go cheap, lose your property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, in other words, if I'm having a property dispute especially one involving the court system, I DO want a survey. When court is involved, the person who's being cheap is the one who tends to lose. Ask all those people who thought they were smart enough to defend themselves in court, or who thought the court-provided lawyer was actually going to do anything.

      You want a surveyor to be involved in ANY property issue, whether it goes to court or not. If you want to build a fence, remove a tree near a lot line, whatever, you should have a thorough survey done to know where your boundary lines are for your property, if one hasn't been done before you bought the property. Surveyors have centimeter or less accuracy GPS units and can tell you EXACTLY where your lot lines (and corners) are within that accuracy. We've never had that level of accuracy before GPS and it has had a major impact on real estate.

      I cannot tell you how many people I've known over the years that have put fences in (in particular) and found out a few years later when the property next to them goes up for sale and a modern survey is done that their fence is on the neighbors property. It costs thousands to get that fixed, legally. I won't even go into the idiots that built additions near lot lines and ended up on the wrong side or too close to the line and had to demolish or "emend" the addition. Nightmare.

  32. Buwahahhhhhhaaahahaha by Dereck1701 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Google Earth Pro includes parcel data that definitively defines property boundaries."

    No, Just no.... I work in GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and I can GUARANTEE that a vast majority of the property lines displayed in the program do not "definitively defines property boundaries". Some may not be far off, some may not be too bad, most will only be in the ball park and some will be horribly off, the only way to be sure one way or another would be a title search and a survey and even then once in a while things can go wrong. Property description is insanely complicated, in my area the property records go back into the 1840s and technically to be sure someone has to trace and map every sale from now back to then. Since that is extremely time consuming most title companies these days only trace it back 40-60 years and then rely on insurance to pick up the tab if the issue exists further back. Most GIS maps don't try to do ANY of that, they grab the tax records or maps if they exist and digitize (scan them, electronically rubber sheet them to a rough geographic base and then draw some digital lines on top of the scans hand drawn ones) them making your average digital property line map at best 5-50' accurate. Even with organizations that go the extra distance and rebuild the parcel layer off of certified orthophotos (3' accuracy for 90% of surveyed points) you're only improving to about 5-10' accuracy. In a very few rare circumstances you may get some parcels where employees actually went out to properties that happened to be surveyed and then you're probably getting sub-centimeter accuracy for about 0.00000000002% of the parcels.

    1. Re:Buwahahhhhhhaaahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then you're probably getting sub-centimeter accuracy for about 0.00000000002% of the parcels.

      Hi there. Just so you know, that represents approximately a single 10m square on the entire surface area of the earth.

      Yes, I get peeved by people attempting to use egregious abuse of orders of magnitude as a form of hyperbole. BTW, are you the kind of person who uses 5 exclamation points on a single sentence if you "omg *reeeeeeaaaalllllly* mean something"?

    2. Re:Buwahahhhhhhaaahahaha by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      LOL yes exactly this. I also work in GIS, and specifically in this particular field.

      I'll add to everything you just said, plus anyone who has ever used Google Maps, should know that some of their stuff is out of date, some of it very out of date. Parcel data changes all the time. I am willing to bet that whatever Google maps uses is significantly out of date. The data also tends to be pretty expensive also to acquire as its maintenance is also. So anyone that uses this as anything other than to get a general idea is fooling themselves. The world of land registry and titles is improving, but much of it is stuck in an archaic system, Some of which is due to the simple vastness of the legacy records out there, and also due to some specific legal requirements that exist. I have access to systems and data that the public doesn't, and even then, to get a definitive answer, you need go through a more manual process.

      As you say, EVEN going through the manual process can be a challenge (if doing it for legal purposes), and a bit of a historical lesson. Depending on when and where the land was surveyed different methods may have been used. I recall my Dad who was a lawyer looked into some land my grandfather owned, which ended up being some of the first land given out by the King. It pretty much pre-dated any kind of survey method, and was mostly based on features that may or may not exist anymore or that may have changed. All hand written, in an ancient book. I also recall an example when I took a course on land registry about a property dispute, where the description included a river, which of course changed its course to give more land to one land owner, and less to another, then trying to prove the old track of the river... etc... In some instances more art than science unfortunately.

      Anyway it is still pretty cool that the software is free, and it does include some of this information. Though I do see it causing headaches when people in the public using it, assume it is accurate, take it as gospel, then make decisions or engage lawyers/land registry/government into it... Hopefully there is a big disclaimer on the data (not that anyone will read or pay any attention to metadata in my experience).

    3. Re:Buwahahhhhhhaaahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "not that anyone will read or pay any attention to metadata in my experience"

      Its worse than that in too many cases. We print right on every map something to the effect of "this is just a reference, not a survey, get one if you want to know where your lines are with any certainty" in addition to verbal warnings and we'll still regularly get people in a few weeks after another person gets a map of a property claiming that the first person is waiving the map around in front of the neighbors saying "I got this map from the Government and it proves that the line is where I said it is".

  33. Re:/. deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you

  34. Re:Earth = USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you expect them to have demographics and traffic count data for the whole world? (I didn't try it so I don't know how they limited the features to USA only, assuming they did)

  35. Chrome? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    Shame on Google for including a pre-checked checkbox to download Chrome as part of the package. That's download.com level shady.

    Good or bad, your products need to stand alone when there's nothing whatsoever tying them together other than the downloader.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  36. Re:/. deals by youn · · Score: 1, Troll

    I loooove cookies... I love the oreo, I love the chocolate chips... I looove cookies

    What do you mean, not that kind of cookies? :p

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  37. Re:/. deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (and ironically my captcha for this post is "profits")

    I'm firmly convinced the captcha for these is generated from word analysis of the post one is replying to (or the content of one's post if it's available when the captcha is fetched).

  38. sh: ./googleearth-bin: not found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look what the script does. Fix the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. No workie. After a bit of fiddling, add it to ld.so.conf and run ldconfig. At least ldd reports all the libraries are found now*, but the error message doesn't change. I'm guessing it might be looking for a feature in X that isn't there, but I'd expect a more specific error message in that case. Tracing the calls isn't available on this box, and is really taking requirements a little far. Anyhow, google earth is still terra incognita for me. Thanks so much, google.

    * oh the joys of shared libraries dedicated to just one program.

  39. Re:Earth = USA by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Typical whiner. It was a for profit product. If it had been selling in your country, it probably would have been available with the data there as well. But go ahead and pile on because you got something for free that doesn't have everything you wanted.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  40. Re:Mac and "PC" only...oh, I see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bother with WINE - format your HD and install Windows 8! Much better than Linux!

  41. Not New.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    You have been able to get a free license for over a year now. Just sign up for one and select "personal" for the use and you get a free license emailed to you.

    So now they have a generic license that you dont have to request.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  42. I just tried it 2 weeks ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for my hobby project of editing videos. So I am happy to hear it now is free and I don't have to rely on my "trial". :)

    I took data from Endomondo and imported into google earth pro. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdtAub0tKlE

    For some reason when I made the movie in Google Earth Pro in 1080p / 50 fps, the track flickered a bit, and also were "double" a few places, I assume the flicker is because of the track getting underground when rendering the movie.

  43. Why do I have to sign in all the time with GE Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it. What's the point?

  44. Re:Mac and "PC" only...oh, I see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 8 is a big pile of fail.

  45. Re: /. deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idiot are those who don't understand business. Pop ups = sponsors = free for all of us to see or be here to begin with.