Slashdot Mirror
Airport Using Google Glass For Security and Passenger Information
An anonymous reader notes this story about how an Amsterdam airport is putting Google Glass to use. "One of Europe's busiest airports, Amsterdam's Schiphol hub in the Netherlands, is trialling Google Glass for use by airport authority officers as a hands-free way to look up gate and airplane information. It's also testing Google's face computer on travelers passing through the terminal in a bid to better understand the 'customer journey', thanks to Glass' first person perspective....Google has pulled back on 'Glass for the masses' — at least for now. It shuttered its Glass Explorer program last month. Although far from killing off Glass, it has handed the project to Nest's Tony Fadell to oversee. Glass lives, as a standalone division within Google that's yet to prove its worth — but which Google evidently isn't willing to give up on, even though it's been forced to have a rethink about its go-to-market strategy. And, in all likelihood, the entire product proposition/design of the hardware."
Now, this is something I'd assert is a proper use for Google Glass -- a way to help improve workflow. I can see this being useful not just at the airport, but for bank tellers and other retail staff. It not just is a way of presenting info, but if something bad does happen, it is a way of helping prove who did it, especially if it takes place out of the arc of the overhead CCTV cameras.
This is a lot better use of the technology than trying to cam at the local Alamo Drafthouse.
It is being expanded and turned into its own division.
No, it's being pinched off like a dingleberry. If it ever bears fruit because someone else takes an interest and does something with it, they'll parade it about and sing its praises as if they've always believed in it.
All of the suckers who bought one (at ridiculous prices) have nothing to show for it and have been cut off from any and all further development / revisions.
The only ones with access to it going forward will be Google and whatever company decides they want to pay Google $BIG_MONEY$ to get their hands on it.
even though it's been forced to have a rethink about its go-to-market strategy
And here is the example that every other frelling company out there needs to learn; if people don't want to use your product the way you expect them to you need to change your expectations. The classic demonstration of this is the Ford Edsel, but there is no lack of newer examples, such as why did MS go forward with Win 8 even after the test users uniformly hated the new interface? Ballmer had decided that users were going to conform to his product, with end the result that huge enterprise customers (and many of MS's internal users) refused to upgrade. Google is doing the smart thing, they've got a product that is useful in many scenarios, just not popular in the scenario they originally envisioned. They're going to work on the markets where it makes sense now, such as security, medical systems, and architectural design.
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
The police, or at least the people police report too, are going to love these things. The devices will replace at least three other devices, the personal radio+mic, the body camera and the in-vehicle computer console.
I expect to see every cop in the US wearing these inside of five years. For better or worse.
Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
Not that hard either, just use the NSA backdoors in the protocol and hijack the streams
Then their GGs would show a nice little old lady going thru security instead of the actual person.
Or maybe show they have credentials for pass thru.
For every solution, their is a workaround.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
All the complaints about how hololens isn't holographic and just has a holographic prism or whatever aside, it seems like it's actually more like the thing I want. And I only want to use it when I'm driving, really. No real privacy implications there, nobody seems to be railing against dashcams.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
The only ones with access to it going forward will be Google and whatever company decides they want to pay Google $BIG_MONEY$ to get their hands on it.
And just like Dean Kamen's "it", anyone who knocks one off in their garage for peanuts. And also just like that particular "it", it's not changing the world because it's not new, just a refinement of things which already existed and which anyone could have told you wouldn't change the world if refined a bit.
Wearable computers with cameras and HUDs (however primitive) were around before Glass, Hololens and others are coming, and there will be more in the future. They're inevitable now that they're cost-effective to implement. No big deal if people can't get their hands on this particular example. Anyone who spent money they couldn't afford to throw away on a program that was clearly in deep, deep alpha is an idiotic tool. People who spent throwaway money on Glass and played with it are also mostly tools, but at least some of them knew what they were doing.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Personally I am hoping Google Glass comes into fruition as a publicly available and useful tool, as one of it's greatest potentials may be the ability to help those with Alzheimer's and other forms of progressive dementia live a somewhat normal and independent life. I imagine a future where all the Alzheimer's patient needs to remember is to put on their Google Glass in the morning. Google Glass will remind them of the names of everyone they know, perhaps even remind them of their past conversations among other things, when to take their medication, what is on their calendar for that day, and how to get home after they've gone for a walk.
Google Glass and self driving cars could be the saviors of the elderly and the young alike, keeping the elderly independent far longer than is feasible today thus keeping them from being a burden on the younger generations at the same time.
Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
If the goatse guy goes through customs, does he get a huge picture of that on his google glass?
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
I can set up a less conspicuous custom-made augmented reality device of my own. Piece of cake. Cant understand all the fuzz.
If all of the airport personnel are wearing Glass (or something like it) you could have a real life Metal Gear Solid kind of "zone of vision" for all the airport security. Makes getting that bottle of water through security a lot easier.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
From Black Mirror, a great series on Netflix and also in-full on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
See subject: IF Google's the one that pitched this to the 'airport security crowd' (& the airport security contractors etc. didn't think of it themselves that is) then, YES, they're smart/good marketers!
I feel it was very intelligent of them to open up a new market & way of applying Google Glasses!
"NOT too shabby!"
* NOW - if they're smart, & generally they are I suppose, then law enforcement as a WHOLE represents a new sector of buyers too!
APK
P.S.=> "Glassholes are *EVERYWHERE*...", law enforcement included... apk