Slashdot Mirror


Comets Form Like Deep Fried Ice Cream Scoops

astroengine writes Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, Calif., have added another oddity to the cometary 'weird list': comets are best described as scoops of deep fried ice cream. "The crust is made of crystalline ice, while the interior is colder and more porous," said Murthy Gudipati of JPL, co-author of a recent study appearing in The Journal of Physical Chemistry. "The organics are like a final layer of chocolate on top."

37 comments

  1. But how do they taste? by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    I'm just asking for a friend.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:But how do they taste? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't try tasting a comet - your tongue would stick to it

    2. Re:But how do they taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Meatier.

  2. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't put out statements right before lunch.

  3. Hmm. They finally caught up to the fictional JPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The JPL astronomers in the Niven / Pournelle book Lucifer's Hammer use hot fudge sundae as the model for the comet in the book, when they are trying to compute the damage it will do if it hits the earth. See page 85 or so, depending on your edition of the book. https://books.google.com/books?id=mWL5SdJobpcC&pg=PA85&lpg=PA85&dq=lucifer%27s+hammer+hot+fudge+sundae&source=bl&ots=DWaZRJZoGM&sig=_1d6AE4rnz8dzJ4R-aB3RJEnb5A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=FbHbVLGoAYT0oATL0oGgCQ&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=lucifer's%20hammer%20hot%20fudge%20sundae&f=false

    Nice to see that real life has confirmed 30 year old fiction :-)

  4. Not really odd by Iamthecheese · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's what happens when you melt and refreeze the surface of a foamed polyphasic material. How is this odd?

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Not really odd by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Because most of us have probably never heard of foamed polyphasic materials, and consequently don't know the effects of repeated melting and freezing of their surface?

      Just sayin' ... some of us need the ice cream analogy.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Not really odd by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Most of us do not know that technical jargon sentence, no, but must of us understand what happens when you melt and refreeze something like that.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Not really odd by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Hmm he was probably looking forward a +5 Funny.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Not really odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kinda like that fancy flaming ice cream I ate once. It's on god damn fire and yet it's still solid, delicious cold ice cream. Witchcraft and heresy make the best combination.

    5. Re:Not really odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this odd?

      We still have people around here insisting comets have almost no water on them and that water has never been seen, even by Rosetta... despite the direct measurements of water vapor in the coma and frozen subsurface water by Rosetta. Nearly anything is going to be odd or counter-intuitive to someone around here.

    6. Re:Not really odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in science, and I specialize in stellar and planetary formation. I am so absolutely embarassed every time my fellow scientists come up with moronic clickbait titles like this, so "the public can relate" (and we scientists can have our hot headline, and the illusion that we will be granted our funding).

      I am so very sorry that the "ignorant public" has to be patronized with nonsense like this, and I hope a day will come where titles are honest, descriptive and objective as we OWE them to the public to be.

      I look forward to a moment where "the public" --whose trust we betray for making up crap titles like these, instead of putting their money to good use-- actually benefits from the research they have paid for. Instead, publicly paid research goes behind paywalled journals owned by parasitic middlemen who add no value at all to the publication, appart from boosting one's own career.

      For those reasons and some more that I will not bore you with, I am dumping my field soon, moving to the private sector, a little bit bitter for that, but I really cannot be part of this ludicrous and hypocrytical fair. I do take physics seriously, but not fucking up my Karma has to be a priority here.

    7. Re:Not really odd by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

      People like you give me hope.

      -That is, people listening to their inner voice and rather than shutting it down, acting on it to try to bring themselves into closer alignment with objective reality and sanity.

      It's tough, and not everybody has the stones for it, which is why those who make the push deserve a ton of respect. The easy roads all lead to nutsville.

  5. Nice collaborative work by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    NASA in TFA relates in details that the work they did mainly comes from the European Space Agency results from the Rosetta mission.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  6. So, hot fudge sundae... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    which falls on a Tuesdae this month, as I recall....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:So, hot fudge sundae... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Dammit! You beat me to it!!!!

      Niven and Pournelle got it right!!!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:So, hot fudge sundae... by nytes · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

      For those who missed some of the better 1970's scifi.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    3. Re:So, hot fudge sundae... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, what happens on Shatterday?

    4. Re:So, hot fudge sundae... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Dammit! Beat me to it.

  7. Um What? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Comets Form Like Deep Fried Ice Cream Scoops

    They're rolled in cinamon and sugar and deep fried?

  8. Oh yeah? by Gription · · Score: 1

    I double dog dare you!!

  9. food in the skies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Next: the Moon is made of green cheese.

    1. Re:food in the skies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The universe was created from spaghetti and meatballs, you know.

  10. Re:Hmm. They finally caught up to the fictional JP by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Most "good" science fiction has things that are true, but just not known yet. Jules Verne has a list of predicted inventions too long for me to list here (I'm sure someone would be offended I left off their favorite). Like good science, if it isn't predictive, it isn't useful. Much of Heinlein and Hubbard is provably impossible now, but was used as plot devices. Star Trek is splitting the difference, a little predictive, a little impossible. Niven liked aliens a little too much to be testable, though Ringworld is proven impossible, without materials we can't even conceive of yet.

  11. Staning out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These planetary boffins have to make increasingly ridiculous comparisons just to stand out.

  12. Does this work on a rubber ducky? by Drethon · · Score: 1

    I thought Rosetta found that 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko is not out gassing evenly. So if things are primary happening in the neck of the rubber ducky, does this reform the shell after melting and rehardening again?

  13. Mmmmmmmm....... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    Deep fried ice cream scoops......

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Mmmmmmmm....... by Livius · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want to deep-fry the scoop?

    2. Re:Mmmmmmmm....... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      Touché

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    3. Re:Mmmmmmmm....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Horta get hungry for sweets sometime. Don't they deserve food that tastes good?

  14. I can't even by houghi · · Score: 1

    I mean, come on, this is like, sooooo boring that these comets form, like, you know venti deep fried ice cream latte scoops. I mean, I can't even ....

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  15. Re:Hmm. They finally caught up to the fictional JP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The JPL astronomers in the Niven / Pournelle book Lucifer's Hammer use hot fudge sundae as the model for the comet in the book, when they are trying to compute the damage it will do if it hits the earth...

    So, when we get up close to one someone is just going to have to say
    "Man, look at the nuts on that thing!"

  16. Um What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rest assured, this is the *best* description scientists are able to deliver of how comets are formed. I mean, now you know just as much as they do.

  17. From, Like, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how I read it. Then I said. "Scoops what?"

  18. Empty stomach press release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another example why it is a bad idea to compose press releases on an empty stomach

  19. FIRST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First after read-only mode!