Slashdot Mirror


Watch Videos in Synch with Fellow iOS Users (Video)

This video is about Dr. Saeed Darvish-Kazem and Dr. Michael Pazaratz, two MDs from Canada, who came up with a free iOS app called WeMesh that lets you share video content with iOS-owning friends in real time. You see the video and so does your friend. more or less simultaneously. Cat videos and 90s music are two categories the doctors say are especially popular on WeMesh, which only works with YouTube at the moment, a shortcoming they hope to change in the near future. NOTE: If you're on the Slashdot main page and click the 'Read' link below this paragraph, the video will autoplay.

71 comments

  1. Solution looking for a problem? by TWX · · Score: 1

    I can't think of all that many times when this would be useful socially. Such a thing could be useful in a classroom setting if for some reason the instructor doesn't have a projector and wants the students to be done with a video lesson at the same time, but for that to work best some form of central control (to force the video to load and to force the video to the foreground) would be necessary, and would still need students to use their headphones and to pay attention.

    So, what is this for?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually pretty great for watching videos with friends over IRC or Skype or whatever. But people have been doing this with websites that start your YouTube player at the same time (see sync-video.com), not to mention private streaming sites in the same vein as Twitch (not always legal, but hey).

    2. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the idea is that you can share a video without having to hand over your phone or having to crowd around it.

      Sort of like what Microsoft is doing for sharing photos with Xim (http://www.getxim.com/, cross-platform and the people you're sharing with can even watch in the browser via a texted link if they don't have the app).
      Though I personally think sharing multiple photos is more useful than sharing a video in this way because you don't get the problem of handing over your phone and having somebody swipe too far and seeing pictures you didn't want them to see.

    3. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Adriax · · Score: 2

      Google hangouts has a youtube option that syncs youtube across the hangout.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    4. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by TWX · · Score: 1

      Or, you could just e-mail or SMS-message or google-chat or any of a multitude of ways send them a link to the video, so they can open it when they want to, be it now or later...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by TWX · · Score: 1

      It's low-tech I know, but back in my IRC days if one wanted everyone to watch something in real-time together, the link was posted, then someone would count down and everyone would open the link (or more accurately, watch the video file that they pulled down from the link in the pre-streaming days) and watch it...

      This wasn't exactly difficult, and it was completely platform independent.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about iOS, but in Linux (with KDE), I think it would be possible to gather a bunch of friends and watch a game in a 3x3 smartphone grid. It's sync but each one gets 1/9th of the video.

    7. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      It would be useful if you are driving with two kids in the back seat watching the same movie.

    8. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not useful for much at all. I know my give-a-shit-o-meter is at an all-time low.

    9. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by technomom · · Score: 1

      YouTube has this. Samsung had this on their phones too.

      Nothing new here.

    10. Re:Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I was doing this in the 90's between IE browsers streaming WMV files, using xmlhttprequest to sync the playback through a central server. This is not rocket science.

    11. Re: Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean via a browser hangout..? Not within the mobile app, though. It launches within YouTube and pretty much removes you from the hangout. In fact, this has been one of my main criticisms of the app. I'm glad someone more ambitious than I saw the problem as well and created their own solution.

    12. Re: Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not really the need this app is aiming to meet though..it seems to focus on the "synchronized" element of media watching. Simply sharing a video is one thing, and that will never go out of style⦠But this seems to offer a synchronized/recreate being in the same room experience.

    13. Re: Solution looking for a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where is your app? There are a shit ton of apps just putting together things that you could mcgyver for yourself at home. But these guys saw a marketable idea and moved on it... Sounds to me that you've had 25 years to make an app out of it. I know that I, for one, would find it much easier to use this app than go the hell of herding cats that is attempting to synchronize a video *to the second* with two or more people...
      Seems like a pretty smart idea for an app to me considering most criticisms are "du'I could do that". So then...here is an app that does the thing you like to do but better and easier.

  2. bennett haselton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can I read bennett's frequent contributions in sync too?

  3. autoplay?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco, what the hell is this video autoplay shit? If I want to watch the video I am capable of clicking on the "play" button.

    1. Re:autoplay?!? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      NOTE: If you're on the Slashdot main page and click the 'Read' link below this paragraph, the video will autoplay.

      Why? Slashdot is already having multiple daily outages. When users are allready cheesed off, autoplayiing a video is not a smart move.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:autoplay?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOTE: If you're on the Slashdot main page and click the 'Read' link below this paragraph, the video will autoplay.

      Why? Slashdot is already having multiple daily outages. When users are allready cheesed off, autoplayiing a video is not a smart move.

      Yes and think of the danger of thousands upon thousands of slashdot users watching a video in perfect synchronisation being cheesed off at the exact same moment. All that power of fanatical cheesed-offness being focused on one single thing ming cause Dice Holdings to burst into flames and be atomised.

    3. Re:autoplay?!? by PPH · · Score: 1

      They misspelled 'ought to play'. Evidently, there is no support for HTML5 video yet.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:autoplay?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for me (latest firefox, linux), there is. what browser do you use?

    5. Re:autoplay?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know taco left slashdot in 2011, right? Might be time to get out from under that rock.

    6. Re:autoplay?!? by PPH · · Score: 1

      what browser do you use?

      Iceweasel 24.8.1 (Firefox on Debian). No Flash, but it works fine with YouTube and all the porn sites that support HTML5.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  4. Dr. Michael Pazaratz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kudos for getting medicine doctor this young.

  5. Low standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this just live streaming? But with a third party host? How are these people able to market this as something novel? This is the 21st century -- I was promised robots and flying cars, not this garbage!

  6. Why do you turn on autoplay? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Informative
    Please do not link to any site that autoplays a video. Chrome handles html5 natively. It is not easy to block it in chrome. That alone is going drive users away from Chrome to Firefox+NoScript. It is just a matter of time before advertisers and sleazy websites add autoplaying videos. It is back to X10 popup and blinking text of geocities.

    Thanks for the warning, you will see the drastic reduction in hits for such links from Chrome. You will create a policy of not linking to any site that has auto play video. Also why do you include it directly in read? Can't you just put up a link and say click to play?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Why do you turn on autoplay? by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      That alone is going drive users away from Chrome to Firefox+NoScript.

      FYI, this is a good thing...

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    2. Re:Why do you turn on autoplay? by Eythian · · Score: 1

      Flashblock in firefox has the option to block HTML5 video, too. And you've just reminded me to turn it on.

    3. Re:Why do you turn on autoplay? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      You mean Chrome, the web browser written by the world's biggest online advertising firm, makes it difficult to avoid annoying advertisements? That doesn't sound right at all.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    4. Re:Why do you turn on autoplay? by Garybaldy · · Score: 1

      I just manually added "ooyala.com" to the adblock plus filters in chrome. That was the first time i saw the auto play video a couple weeks ago. Have not scene any auto play videos sense.

    5. Re:Why do you turn on autoplay? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Please do not link to any site that autoplays a video. Chrome handles html5 natively. It is not easy to block it in chrome. That alone is going drive users away from Chrome to Firefox+NoScript. It is just a matter of time before advertisers and sleazy websites add autoplaying videos. It is back to X10 popup and blinking text of geocities.
      Thanks for the warning, you will see the drastic reduction in hits for such links from Chrome. You will create a policy of not linking to any site that has auto play video. Also why do you include it directly in read? Can't you just put up a link and say click to play?

      Just can't win, can you? I mean, back when it was some proprietary flash player everyone complained because Linux doesn't have Flash, other than Chromium.

      Now we got to a nice standardized format (HTML5) and people still complain?

      And in reality, the <video> tag has an "autoplay" attribute - if it's present the video autoplays. if not, it doesn't.

      (And if you're handy, in the DOM there's a piece of javascript that writes the video tag and sets the autoplay option based on a setting).

      If you want, write to Mozilla, Apple, Microsoft and Google to have them ignore the autoplay attribute if present so videos don't autoplay at all no matter what the webmaster's intent. It's the advantage of HTML video - the user is in charge and their browser is free to ignore or obey the webmaster's intention.

      Just like most web browsers ignore "text-decoration: blink " (blink tag has been deprecated in a CSS world. Though most browsers actually don't obey the CSS either).

    6. Re:Why do you turn on autoplay? by antdude · · Score: 1

      We need HTML5 video blockers like for Flash, Silverlight, etc. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    7. Re:Why do you turn on autoplay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do not link to any site that autoplays a video. Chrome handles html5 natively. It is not easy to block it in chrome. That alone is going drive users away from Chrome to Firefox+NoScript. It is just a matter of time before advertisers and sleazy websites add autoplaying videos. It is back to X10 popup and blinking text of geocities.

      Thanks for the warning, you will see the drastic reduction in hits for such links from Chrome. You will create a policy of not linking to any site that has auto play video. Also why do you include it directly in read? Can't you just put up a link and say click to play?

      http://www.hdfilmx.com/tag/fifty-shades-of-grey-izle/

  7. Flashblock by cruff · · Score: 1

    If you're on the Slashdot main page and click the 'Read' link below this paragraph, the video will autoplay.

    This is exactly why I use Flashblock.

    1. Re:Flashblock by Garybaldy · · Score: 1

      Adding "ooyala.com" to adblock plus filters prevent the video from even showing up.

    2. Re:Flashblock by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. Fucking autoplay jerks should be strung up from the nearest tree

  8. Gee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish my Window/Linux/Android stuff could stream video. That Apple technology is almost like alien tech. How to they do it??

  9. FUCK YOU SLASHDOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AUTOPLAY AGAIN?!?!!?!

    Do you seriously think I'm going to think positively of the article or video with this utter shit?

  10. Autoplay videos cause cancer for Slashdot editors. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, not really, but I'd sure like it if it were true.

  11. congrats you have invented TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think all of us readers at slashdot want to say congratulations to these innovators for this, we are sorry that live streaming and multicast failed, if only we had used the words "mesh" and "cloud based" we could of made them a success

  12. Are you kidding me? by EmeraldBot · · Score: 1

    AUTOPLAY? REALLY!?

    Come on now, that is a huge pain in the ass! I thought we all agreed to that! You couldn't have been bothered to remove it? For that matter, the article itself has a severe spelling and grammar flaw. That reeks of laziness! REEKS , I tell you. How completely and utterly disappointing.

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  13. Another unnecessary mobile app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are doctor we know whats best for you

  14. Dice by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    I was looking hard for a Dice link, but couldn't find it. What's up with that? There's got to be a Dice angle, right?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  15. This could be very useful by J-1000 · · Score: 1

    I won't be quick to dismiss this. One of the downsides of watching internet videos is that you lose out on some of the shared viewing experience. Meanwhile the shared communication experience (voice, Twitter, whatever) is nearing full strength. It would make sense to take advantage of that. There's value in seeing things at once, as a group.

    Another example is with online-only shows like House of Cards. It's an excellent show and binge watching is great. But I think Netflix may be missing out on a lot of word of mouth that might come with a shared viewing experience. It might have benefited them if, for example, they had a countdown for each individual episode to become available (with unlimited streaming after), perhaps on a more traditional broadcast schedule. It might improve water cooler discussions.

    1. Re:This could be very useful by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I won't be quick to dismiss this. One of the downsides of watching internet videos is that you lose out on some of the shared viewing experience. .

      This is the biggest benefit of the internet. The hive mind can all browse and search various content on their own and in their own time, only passing on worthy material to others in the group, thus increasing the quality of overall consumed content exponentially. This product is like trying to herd cats. It'll take you a week to find a free slot in everyone's calender only to find the video is shit and you have to start all over again. And don't even think about if one person gets interrupted, can you group pause and rewind? I can't think of anything more useless...

    2. Re:This could be very useful by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      Lots of great internet stuff requires "being there". Live chats. Live events. Game streaming. It's nothing new and in the right circumstance it works.

      The weakest part of YouTube has got to be the comments. They are silent, and they are usually stupid or old or both. Now imagine joining a voice chat (or even text) channel with others sharing a common interest, watching something simulcasted and talking about it in real time, with a person or a mechanism designated to queue up videos. That has possibilities. These don't have to be people you know.

      There are already ways to do this, of course. The trick is creating an interface that makes it easy enough for the idea to gain traction.

    3. Re:This could be very useful by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Youtube works because I can choose when I want to watch it, and if I choose to read comments from 1 year ago they are still there to be read. Having to co-ordinate my viewing time with others is just adding an additional, much more difficult step.
      Facebook has already solved this problem. You watch something interesting, share with your friends, make comments, they watch when it suits them, they comment, win win. (Note: I fucking hate facebook but the sharing videos among your friends is already done. Having to do it simultaneously adds no value, if anything it makes it much much worse.

  16. These guys never had a long-distance relationship? by swb · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing maybe not even a short distance relationship.

    I dated a woman in another city and can remember spending hours on the phone with her and occasionally even watching a TV program with her all while on the phone (and this was 25+ years ago when long distance actually cost money).

    For what it's worth, it might be kind of fun to have this kind of real-time social component with Netflix streamed movies, either with people you knew or with other people who liked the same shows or movies.

  17. What I want sync'd is by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    the lips to the audio. Unless I'm watching a DVD my lipsync is off maybe 50% of the time. Sometimes by a lot. I don't know if it's the source, the cable, my router (I have Uverse, my TV comes through my router), my DVR, my TV, or some combination.

    1. Re:What I want sync'd is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      posting AC, too lazy to log in these days. Anyhow, it's more than likely your TV (doubly so if it's a smart TV you're using with an external audio system), or the DVR. Everything else is buffered somehow someway. I'd bet on it being right at the point of playback.

      Captcha: STONED. too fitting.

    2. Re: What I want sync'd is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My money is the encoding was done while playing a game, streaming a video, and mining bitcoins.

  18. Re:These guys never had a long-distance relationsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is cool even in non-romantic relationships, considering how easy it is to make friends all over the globe thanks to the Internet.

    I've been looking for a good solution that runs on PC for years, but haven't found one that just works. I've used a buggy VLC and media player plugin. They were trying too hard to keep things in sync down to the milisecond level and would only work on a LAN. Useless for streaming video, but netflix and youtube block certain videos based on the country you're in, so that has never been much of an option.

    A delay of 2-3 seconds is really not a problem. Manually starting and stopping something or just using instant messenger to send each other timestamps worked fine, but was not as easy as it could've been.

  19. This explains the last dozen doctors I've seen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this is why medicine in Canada is such a freaking mess: they're are too busy thinking about and developing apps to help their patients!

  20. ORANGE MOUND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ORANGE MOUND MOTHAFUCKA

  21. What happens ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... if someone pauses the video to answer their phone or take a shit in the middle? Do we all have to wait?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re: What happens ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      Plus...who would ever turn *off* their phone to take a shit...?

  22. Sausage Party by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to bet a significant percentage of the videos shared with this new app will include penises.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  23. Cool by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    I watch movies and stuff with friends all the time. We usually get on skype in a group call and someone counts off and everyone does their best to hit play at the same time. This is way better. Wish it worked on PC or at least Android.

  24. IMHO, I doubt it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds more like a "I know what you need better than you do" patented Roblimo move. I dunno... maybe he's a nice guy, but over the past 15 years, he's continued to be the single most annoying presence on Slashdot.

    1. Re: IMHO, I doubt it. by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      I have explained more than once to more than one Slashdotmedia management person that autoplay videos were the work of the devil. The leader of the autoplay cabal (obviously) disagrees.

      Ever single person who works directly on Slashdot has an opinion about autoplay videos that is somewhere between dislike and raw hatred. One editor sent a 1665 word plea to kill autoplay videos up the chain of command, and yesterday I growled like an angry dog at the boss person who oversees Slashdot. The guy has always seemed pretty smart to me, but for some reason he is determined to inflict autoplay videos on us despite our ongoing, deepening displeasure.

  25. Synctube for ios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they made a synctube. Good for them. Now why is this on slashdot?

  26. Wow a multicast by asasdlfgnjl · · Score: 1

    Iâ(TM)m so amazed at a pair of MDs ability to multicast video. Wow.

  27. NOTE: [...] the video will autoplay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't for me. Once again glad I killed Javascript in my browser. Although those idiots at Firefox made disappear the convenient checkbox for doing that.

    At least (thanks, slashdot!) there's no patronizing box ("What's going on here? It seems you have an old creaky browser! Hey, you can just... yadda yadda").

    Folks -- just disable Javascript in your browsers. It's really liberating.

  28. Syncplay by phibermon · · Score: 1

    I've been using Syncplay for quite a while, lets you use your own media player, works on the big three. Handles pausing, seeking etc. It's a joy to watch things with people in other countries, especially when used along side voice communication - especially if it's your sweetheart (sigh) So the same functionality on mobile platforms? pretty awesome! I expect such functionality will be part of social media sites in the near future.

  29. Pretty cool idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm impressed with the level of sync these guys have been able to achieve with their app. Tried it with a few of my friends in the same room and it was spot on. I had seen something similar for Samsung a while back but that was just over local wifi. Connection doesn't seem to matter here. I hope they can add some more content sources especially for music but I could see my friends and I using this at a party.

  30. Comments these days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Autoplay *bitch bitch bitch*.

    Article topic *ignored*.

  31. Nice app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the design. Perfect for my girlfriend and I. Will there be an android version planned?

  32. Stolen idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow.
    Great job, you stole an idea. There is a site called instasync.com that does this kind of thing for years already. The original site was synchtube.com which went down though. instasync was the more or less official follow up.
    Stop stealing ideas.

    1. Re: Stolen idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an app. This is mobile/handheld specific. I know that, personally, I spend most of my time on mobile devices anyway. Not to mention while traveling or just not in a position where I can be in front of my computer in general⦠Like in bed or on the shitter. None of those sites have worked even a little bit when I've tried them on my phone/iPad. This app so far, however, has worked like a dream. Like, have you even given it a shot? Why don't you actually try the app before shitting all over it..?

  33. IDEA STOLEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow.
    Great job, you stole an idea. There is a site called instasync.com that does this kind of thing for years already. The original site was synchtube.com which went down though. instasync was the more or less official follow up.
    Stop stealing ideas!!

    1. Re:IDEA STOLEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.
      Great job, you stole an idea. There is a site called instasync.com that does this kind of thing for years already. The original site was synchtube.com which went down though. instasync was the more or less official follow up.
      Stop stealing ideas!!

      Synctube wasn't mobile. I've been waiting for something like this to come out for the iPhone. Hope these guys can put this on Android soon.

  34. This is stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone: This is a stolen idea!

    There is a site called instasync.com that does this kind of thing for years already. The original site was synchtube.com which went down though. instasync was the more or less official follow up.
    Stop stealing ideas.