Slashdot Mirror


Inventors Revolutionize Beekeeping

wombatmobile writes For more than 5,000 years, apiarists donned protective suits and lit bundles of grass to subdue swarms of angry bees while they robbed their hives of precious, golden honey. Now two Australian inventors have made harvesting honey as easy as turning a tap — literally. Cedar Anderson and his father Stuart have just been rewarded for a decades worth of inventing and refining with a $2 million overnight success on Indiegogo. Their Flow Hive coopts bees to produce honey in plastic cells that can be drained and restored by turning a handle, leaving the bees in situ and freeing apiarists from hours of smoke filled danger time every day.

131 comments

  1. Sweet! by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nuff said.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      freeing apiarists from hours of smoke filled danger time every day

      I suspect they meant every harvest. We harvest honey from our beehives once per year, and it takes a few hours. That's appropriate enough in the far North, but in places like Florida or California, they might harvest their honey 3 or 4 times per year.

    2. Re:Sweet! by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      So, you're telling me I can't turn the handle every morning to get honey on my toast?

      Unfunded.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:Sweet! by tonywong · · Score: 1

      I think you could, since harvesting/robbing is not invasive now, and a harvest yields kilograms of honey, you could probably go outside in your fluffy robe and turn the handle and dribble some honey on your toast, close the tube and wander back inside.

    4. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of maple sugaring. Used to be, you go to every tree, collect the sap in that old-fashioned bucket. Now it's all piped to a central storage vat. BTW, if a guy asks you to go sugaring with him, be very careful. More careful than I was, back in the day.

    5. Re:Sweet! by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Their proposal includes future plans for a roof mounted hive, with a delivery pipe coming directly into the kitchen.

  2. Nevermind. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thought they were going to revolutionize beerkeeping.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Nevermind. by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, with some additional plumbing you could make mead...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  3. great googly moogly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh, forget it. i thought you were going to steal my bearkeeping thunder.

    1. Re:great googly moogly! by halivar · · Score: 1

      Does this mean my barekeeping idea is still free and clear?

    2. Re:great googly moogly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like my barekelping mill isn't in trouble after all.

  4. Sounds great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But can the frame size fit in a standard 1U data center rack space?

    1. Re: Sounds great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA

    2. Re:Sounds great, but... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Better question, can it fit in a standard window casing? Bees on the outside, honey & biology from the inside.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re: Sounds great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoooosh.

    4. Re: Sounds great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is that, some sort of bee noise? I need to know if it will fit into a 1U rack.

    5. Re:Sounds great, but... by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

      Awesome. All the way around.

      --
      Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
  5. Meanwhile Brooklyn bees starve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because every hipster with roof access bought a hive - but there's only so much bee food available in the city.

  6. Plastic, huh? by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Their Flow Hive coopts bees to produce honey in plastic cells that can be drained and restored by turning a handle

    Though a lot of cheaper honey ends up in plastic containers anyway, I try to buy it in glass jars (or wrapped in paper).

    Will keeping it in "plastic cells" from the very beginning — before it is even harvested — not affect the taste at all?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Plastic, huh? by zifferent · · Score: 2

      Food grade plastic. Not so much.

      --
      cat sig > /dev/null
    2. Re:Plastic, huh? by mi · · Score: 1

      Food grade plastic.

      That's a little vague... Is "food grade" plastic as good as glass or ceramics, or merely almost as good?

      Not so much.

      As in "Only a little", or as in "Not at all"? And, in either case, why weren't you more explicit?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Plastic, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your monster cables are showing.

    4. Re:Plastic, huh? by Whorhay · · Score: 2

      Scientifically speaking, I've no clue but I wouldn't think so. I've never noticed a difference in taste of things like Ketchup, which is much more acidic, when it's stored in plastic vs glass bottles. The big thing that affects the flavor of honey is where the nectar came from, and since the honey is still being produced by tens of thousands of bees swishing their little hearts out, the flavor should be the same.

    5. Re:Plastic, huh? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      The bees coat the plastic with their own wax, thus sealing the cells. When you harvest, the cells are split releasing the honey. Honey contact with plastic is minimal and only happens during harvest.

    6. Re:Plastic, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually "food grade" is incredibly specific since it's a regulated standard that you can look up to answer all your questions.

    7. Re:Plastic, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's not specific *at all*, because there are several different kinds of plastics that can be made to "food grade" standards. Are we talking polyethylene, polypropylene, polycarbonate, etc.? Some are better for food containers than others depending on the need.

    8. Re:Plastic, huh? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      Will keeping it in "plastic cells" from the very beginning — before it is even harvested — not affect the taste at all?

      Why do you think that it would?

    9. Re:Plastic, huh? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      Most plastics (including food grade) are remarkably resilient to acid.
      Now metal, that is a different story. Wise people don't put acidic foodstufs in metal. Not even stainless steel (not SS316(L), not Hasteloy, not Duplex nothing).

      I believe the biggest difference between glass bottles of honey and plastic bottles is that much of the stuff in plastic bottles is sugarwater with some flavor additives. Glass bottles are often considered premium so the manufacturers don't do that.
      The "fake" honey doesn't include all the flavor chemicals that real honey does, just like candy cherries do not have the same flavor as real cherries.
      Mind you: I don't think this would be a bad thing per se, but the manufacturers would need to put it on the bottle.
      "I can't believe it's not honey!"
      "Honey substitute".

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    10. Re:Plastic, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will keeping it in "plastic cells" from the very beginning — before it is even harvested — not affect the taste at all?

      Not sure, but it will definitely release BPAs sitting in the sun all summer so you might grow tits and have irrational mood swings.

  7. Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First of all, for a beekeeper, it is not just smoking the bees to kill time. It is an important part of the whole ritual of being a beekeeper. Infact, most keepers I know don't wear suits, or do so in rare instances. The smoking also is optional, if you know what you are doing.

    Second of all, this can't be good for the bees. I have read research articles that pointed out that square shaped boxes caused the bees not be as productive as how bee hives are in their natural habitats. So, putting them in plastic containers and just churning out the honey seems like the lazy ass way of beekeeping.

    --SK

    1. Re:Two things by zifferent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And lazy is inherently bad, why exactly? I'd bet it's great for the bees as they aren't wasting precious energy making wax. (It takes several times the weight of honey to produce an equivalent measure of wax.) And just because these cells have honey in them doesn't mean the bees aren't keeping honey elsewhere in the hive.

      --
      cat sig > /dev/null
    2. Re:Two things by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Well, driving a car is the lazy ass way of getting around, but it's still more productive for humans.

      As for the box shape, I agree. Most bee hives are customized by the bees, and they build for their environment as well as for honey/egg optimization. I wonder if they could make this thing in a hexagonal configuration? Since you're not needing to pull the comb, it seems to me that they could build this in any shape a bee might like.

      The plastic containers may actually be a benefit to the bees, as they would have to spend less time on infrastructure. Eventually though, the thing is going to need to be cleaned. The bees will have to move out for that part.

    3. Re:Two things by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, putting them in plastic containers and just churning out the honey seems like the lazy ass way of beekeeping.

      Sorry, but what? Pretty much every technological advance we've ever made has been about someone being lazy.

      So, tell you what, stop using the wheel, the lever, an engine, electricity, refrigeration, or pretty much anything which takes the work out for you.

      Stop being such a lazy bastard and ignore all modern progress which reduces your labor.

      Otherwise you're full of crap.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Two things by zifferent · · Score: 2

      Dude. If there is honey left over. Don't worry, about cleaning. The bees will take care of it.

      --
      cat sig > /dev/null
    5. Re:Two things by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Commenting on a forum is a lazy-ass way of communicating. You should hand write and deliver your message to each person that wants to read it.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:Two things by Beck_Neard · · Score: 2

      Aside from not being good for the bees, there are a bunch of other problems I can think of, even assuming the whole thing isn't another crowdfunding scam (a la hoverboards and solar roadways) and works as advertised.

      1. The system can't be cheap.

      2. There's no way it can drain all the honey from the hive. I'd be extremely surprised if it got even 50%. Most of the honey is going to remain in the comb and stick to the tubes. There's no way you could flush that out without ruining the honey.

      3. Commercial honey extraction involves multiple centrifuging and filtering steps to get a nice clear consistency. Crystal-clear honey on tap sounds dubious.

      4. What happens to the hive after extraction? Bees produce honey cells and cap them with wax. This system apparently drains the honey from behind, without uncapping. Great, but then you're left with a bunch of half-full combs that the bees won't touch again. Seems like you'd have to remove the combs from the hive and uncap 'the old-fashioned way' anyway if you want the bees to keep producing.

      I can't imagine this system being useful for anything other than small-scale, one-off, hobbyist honey production. And, again, that's assuming it works as advertised.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    7. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being such a lazy bastard and ignore all modern progress which reduces your labor.

      Not to nitpick or turn this overly political, but all modern progress does not reduce "your labor". All modern progress becomes the baseline of labor expectation of... labor, and for the great majority, their labor is reduced none at all--it's just causing increased productivity which is then summarily siphoned off by corporations and their shareholders. This works because you always have a competitor who can also "save labor" in the same way to replace you. Is the average middle-class person "working less hard" than 50 years ago? Not at all.

      Try applying for a job for which a computer or a car are now standard tools, and suggest you'd rather do it the "old school way". After the laughter dies down, realize you don't drive the car, the car drives you.

    8. Re:Two things by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      RTFA would answer several of your questions.

      1. $600 for box + 8 frames
      2. It's gravity fed, so it'll all flow down eventually.
      3. It's gravity fed, so it'll all flow down eventually.
      4. The bees notice & refill.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:Two things by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is the average middle-class person "working less hard" than 50 years ago? Not at all.

      Have you been on social media websites during the work day?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      AC because Mod

      Beekeeping is not a typical endeavour easily analysed by simple economic theories, The large scale farms that produce most of the world's honey are already using low cost, well-trained labour and will never take up a hobby item like this. Anyone who keeps a few hives does not do it for efficiency of production, they do it for the wonderful connection between human and bee, Bees are such good insects they are practically honorary mammals. There is a peace and a joy to be had by caring for and gently harvesting a modest proportion of the harvest of these amazing and beautiful little creatures.

    11. Re:Two things by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      Bullshit on everything but 1.

      1. As I said, way too expensive.
      2. Nope, that's literally impossible and is false advertising. Now I *know* they are full of shit. Even if honey weren't viscous, that would still be impossible, even with free-running water.
      3. Again, bullshit.
      4. Are you telling me the bees *uncap* a *capped* honey cell, take off the cap, and refill it?

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    12. Re:Two things by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      1. The system is very expensive in terms of normal equipment for bee keeping.

      2. An important part of modern beekeeping is actually not taking all of their honey, unless you are deliberately trying to destroy the hive. My father has kept hives for 40+ years now, and we never took all the honey from a hive, we'd always leave a good portion of the frames or cells untouched. That is the hives food reserves.

      3. Commercial productions use all that filtering because they are getting all sorts of extra stuff in the honey because of how it is harvested. When they pull a frame and cut off the caps bits of capping material and wax from the cells ends up in the honey. With this method I believe they are just letting the honey slowly drain out, which should disturb everything else considerably less and so end up with less contaminants. The commercial industry also does centrifuging to seperate different grades of honey, because people are willing to pay a premium dependant on the grade, which is mainly an issue again because of how the honey is harvested. The most humorous bit regarding honey pricing though is that people will pay dearly for honey still in the comb, often, many times the price of a similiar measure of the most premium graded honey.

      4. Bees will go back to capped cells to add more honey periodically. This method will likely only partially drain cells because the caps prevent the atmospheric pressure in the cells from rapidly equalizing as honey flows out. I could be wrong on that though and possibly the weight of the honey will be enough to cause a vacum that would break the cap, which would elicit a more rapid discovery by the bees of a cell in need of filling.

      I think that the cost of the system at this point will keep non-hobbyists from adopting it. With time though it could definitely improve to the point that they see commercial use.

    13. Re:Two things by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      1. $600 for endless local (good for allergies) honey is way too expensive?
      2. Fluids don't run downhill?
      4. I'm not, they are.

      I'm guessing you didn't actually go look at the design and see what they did that's different than your assumptions.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    14. Re:Two things by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I'd pay $600 + $50/yr for hive mgmt for free honey for the rest of my life.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    15. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If technology is bad, and square is bad, are you proposing that beekeepers stop using frames and go back to using straw skep hives that have to be destroyed to get the honey out? Modern Beekeeping is already an artificial system.

      It is an interesting possibility with this that you could make a more natural cell structure than a planar frame, perhaps curved frames since they don't have to be disassembled on a regular basis. It would be interesting to run some experiments on what might be a better frame shape.

      That said, I'm not sure that continuous small robbing might not have an effect on the long term health of the hive. Frequent taxes can damage morale. :)

    16. Re:Two things by non0score · · Score: 1

      Have you been to the water cooler during the work day?

    17. Re:Two things by Rei · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct that this is a hobby item. And I think it's a great hobby item. They even added emphasis to help maintain the connection with the bees, such as a large clear plastic viewing window on the tap side.

      And it's not like you never have to open up the box. Just not to rob the honey.

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    18. Re:Two things by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      1. You can already get local honey most places in the world where it's possible at all to make honey. And you can get several year's worth for $600 (probably longer than this device will last).

      2. Facepalm. No, fluids don't always run downhill. They especially don't run downhill when they have to overcome pressure. Which they do here.

      3. Yes, bees do occasionally uncap honey cells and add more honey... but I can't see that as a basis for a continuous working system, not the way that it's being advertised here.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    19. Re:Two things by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      3 is fair point. As for 2, you don't take all the honey but you do extract all the honey from a comb once you've extracted it. As for 4, I don't see that working as the basis for a continuously-operating system.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    20. Re:Two things by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      Pick up a book on beekeeping. If you want 'free honey for the rest of your life', prepare for a lot of going out and finding bee swarms (no, bees don't magically enter beehives and no, bee colonies don't have unlimited lifespan).

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    21. Re: Two things by MenThal · · Score: 1

      Have you worked in an office before 1999 and seen the coffee, smoking and newspaper breaks of the older generation?

    22. Re:Two things by adolf · · Score: 1

      1. I like to make my own things. I can buy quality organic sauerkraut imported from Poland and made with two ingredients (cabbage, salt) for close to the same price -- and far less labor -- than if making it myself. But I'm learning to make it myself, anyway, for my own selfish and simple pleasure.

      1.5. Not everything is about profit. Corporations are beholden to maximize shareholder value; I am beholden only to my own whims.

      2. You should get a Nobel prize for your amazing theories on fluid dynamics. (See also: Maple syrup. How do they do it?)

      3. It doesn't matter what you "see." It matters if it is functional or not. I don't know if it is, and you don't know if it is. Neither of us have had our hands on this device, much less used one for a season or three.

      I've been here a long time, so obviously I certainly haven't read TFA and only briefly skimmed TFS, but I sure can recognize FUD as I see it in #49134319 from user 3612467.

      Now get off my lawn.

    23. Re: Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been to Europe?

    24. Re:Two things by azav · · Score: 1

      Lazy or efficient?

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    25. Re:Two things by azav · · Score: 1

      Just like how weaving using a loom is a "lazy" way of weaving a rug.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    26. Re:Two things by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I was able to watch the video when I went home yesterday and the method is different than I had imagined. Each frame is made up of a bunch of strips, which when stacked and pressed together form the cells between each pair of strips. To harvest the honey every other strip is raised or lowered by half a cell, which transforms each row of vertical cells into one long zig zagging channel which drains down into a bottom channel that flows out the end of the frame. This motion should crack, break, or loosen the caps on each cell. The bees will notice the damaged cells and start repairing and refilling the frame pretty quickly.

  8. Fad Ahead? by regular_guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of beekeepers have expressed their opinions about this, though some are more simple speculations than suitable arguments.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    http://www.honeybeesuite.com/s...

    The patent for this device can be found here http://www.freepatentsonline.c...

    The biggest issue I have is the issues for pest mitigation. Small Hive Beetles could conceivably thrive in this device with some of the crevices created. However, it may be possible to incorporate an oil trap or some other measure.
    What people seem to identify as being the biggest issue is the marketing towards ease of honey retrieval, don't need to really deal with the bees at all. That's certainly the biggest misnomer when talking to people about starting a beehive: It's all about the honey! It certainly isn't, and takes a lot more effort than a newcomer might expect. As one person identified: I'll take a look at this when people start selling their used Flow hives 6 months from now (due to too much work, no quick turnaround of honey profit, etc.)

    1. Re:Fad Ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people wouldn't be able to keep pets like cats and dogs, if it weren't for the extensive support from pet food companies, and vets.

    2. Re:Fad Ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a beekeeper, I found this invention interesting. You do bring up the point that this is much too simplistic an approach to beekeeping. During the year, collecting honey is one of the less difficult tasks the a beekeeper undertakes. For the hobbyist with a few hives, the effort is a few days per year. The remaining time is spent with hive growth management and as you mentioned pest management.

      The next year or two will tell where this goes.

    3. Re:Fad Ahead? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      So what exactly is there to do? Educate us instead of whine.

      Why would there be more effort than turning the handle after initial setup?
      Why would you need to deal with the bees at all?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Fad Ahead? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      My dog & cat would be happy to just eat scraps from the dinner table every night.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Fad Ahead? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Did you reply to the correct message? The post was informative and not a whine.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    6. Re:Fad Ahead? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      He was whining about all the shortcomings of the new system.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re:Fad Ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that would impact their health very negatively. They have different nutritional requirements...look it up.

    8. Re:Fad Ahead? by kreuzotter · · Score: 1

      First there are diseases and parasites: deformed wing virus, European foul brood, American Foul brood. Varroa mites are carriers of deseases. Small hive beatles and wax moth can turn your hive into a soup. If you ignore those they will show up in your other hives and in your neigbor's hives. Then there is swarming: Half of your bees leave (and don't make honey) and set up shop in your neigbor's attic (he really likes that). You want to prevent that. You should replace the queen every other year: young queen = many bees = honey. Bees need 60 pounds of honey as food for the winter. You need to make sure you don't take too much, and you may have to feed them if the winter is long.
      For all who are interested: if you want to start beekeeping, NOW is the time to act. Find your local beekeeping club and order bees now.

    9. Re:Fad Ahead? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Very?

      My dog lived on the street for >1 year before we adopted her. She seemed to do ok.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Fad Ahead? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      As I said elsewhere, set up a business to manage the hives.

      $50/yr + 1 quart of honey, check on my hives 2x per year (or whatever makes sense) and we have a deal.

      I just want honey, not another hobby.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    11. Re:Fad Ahead? by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      No, he shared two links to places people involved in beekeeping were talking about the system, one to the patent for the system, and then stated his own view that there might be issues with pest management and people believing that there is nothing but honey collection involved in beekeeping. Nowhere was there any whining, though perhaps some bemused skepticism.

    12. Re:Fad Ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $50/yr + 1 quart of honey, check on my hives 2x per year (or whatever makes sense) and we have a deal. I just want honey, not another hobby.

      Then go to a farmer's market. We can get local honey here cheaper than $50 a quart, and it is more efficient than traveling to someone's house for maintenance several times (much more than two) a year. If all you want is the honey, you don't need the bees yourself. If you want the bees because you want to watch them or use them to pollinate your plants on your property, than you do not just want honey (and there can be easier alternatives for those desires too).

    13. Re:Fad Ahead? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Uh, it'd be gallons per year coming out of the hive. $50 is reasonable to maintain it a couple times a year.

      And bees are good to have around & to learn from.

      Sorry if you can't see there's a decent market here.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    14. Re:Fad Ahead? by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      My dog lived on the street for >1 year before we adopted her. She seemed to do ok.

      Yeah, exactly, dogs are scavengers. They may have hit the evolutionary jackpot by befriending Humans but they're not going to be disastrously affected by a diet more in common with how their ancestors got by.

      Cats I know less about but I suspect they'd be OK as well. They do seem to hunt small prey pretty effectively even when well-fed.

      BTW good on you for giving that stray a home.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    15. Re:Fad Ahead? by Rei · · Score: 1

      I live in a country where beekeeping is juuuust starting to take off. The prevalence of diseases - at present - is probably little to none. And we're highly geographically isolated. So if disease and pest control is normally the biggest challenge, then we've got that taken care of (our main challenges here are cold, windy weather and a long winter; supplimental winter feeding is a must)

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    16. Re:Fad Ahead? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      No you do not want to set up a honey making business, you want to sell a gadget. If you just want the delusion of having a bee hive and them printing money for you in your backyard with you never having to do anything, erm yeah, OK and if that were the case you would not even have bothered with attacking comments. Of course if your marketing, selling and promoting a gadget, then your comments seem far more in alignment with your intent. It seems the people who actually in reality do tend bees, don't hate harvesting the honey, but they actually enjoy it. So yeah, it seems to be a solution to a problem that only existed in the mind of the inventors. You would be the dude that handed out the eggs to the children at an Easter egg hunt because it was easier for everyone all round doing it that way.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re:Fad Ahead? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be gallons; it would be a few quarts. A lot of the interior of the hive is space for the bees to move around. Figure maybe a third or at most half the volume of the super (the part with honey-laden comb in it) is honey.

      http://www.beesource.com/forum...

      I used to work in for a beekeeper, mostly building hives and extracting honey.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    18. Re:Fad Ahead? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Are you saying they're lying about the 3kg (2 1/4 quarts) per comb? x 6 combs is >3 gallons.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    19. Re:Fad Ahead? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not lying, but your average tyro is not going to achieve that. Like the guys on that beekeeper forum said, a single super might produce anywhere from 3 to 20 pounds. But the location and climate need to be optimized. City flora are hardly ideal, and your bees need to be where the nectar is. Where I worked (this was a pro operation, these guys did bees for a living) the supers were on the heavy end, but those bees were taken out to the orchards and buckwheat, or even out of state as conditions might dictate. They didn't make do with whatever the hell was growing around 'em.

      (Buckwheat honey, gag. Most of that got exported.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  9. I think I saw this before.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it looked a lot sexier:
    http://inhabitat.com/philips-unveils-sexy-concept-bee-keeping-gadget/

    Still Good on 'em :)

  10. The Office - Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No Jim, I use a bad apiarist."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGKbwN8Ceew

  11. Harvesting is the least of the work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a bee keeper. Harvesting the honey is the lest of the work and the most enjoyable part. If they could find a way to automatically get invading pests/parasites and fungi out of the hives it would be a revolution. This will just make people who should not have bees get them and that will make the threat to the bees even bigger.

  12. What about the larvae ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the larvae, don't they live in the same cells, will they be squashed ?

    1. Re:What about the larvae ? by heson · · Score: 2

      No you keep the queen confined to a smaller part of the hive.

    2. Re:What about the larvae ? by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      How do you keep the queen confined though? Beekeeping is one of those subjects I've always wanted to know more about but was never really able to find any decent online sources for info.

    3. Re:What about the larvae ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_excluder

    4. Re:What about the larvae ? by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      She's substantially bigger than the drones, so something as 'simple' as a gate would work. large enough for drones, too small for the queen.

      In addition, I'd imagine that a cell with larva in it wouldn't drain.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:What about the larvae ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd recommend "a book of bees and how to keep them" by sue hubbel

    6. Re:What about the larvae ? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Having read up on queen excluder, it seems that the 'pros' don't like them, but take the relatively simple expedient of swapping boxes - IE if the queen starts migrating towards the harvest boxes(intended for honey), you swap the two brood boxes so she's at the bottom again.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  13. IMO, as a beekeeper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been beekeeping for 6 years. I fear this device will create more bee-havers instead of bee-keepers. Bee-havers are bad for apiculture because they do not inspect the bees enough (or in some cases, at all). They do not identify issues with the bees that can spread to other hives miles away. The hives tend to die within two years due to varroa mites and the wax moths and other pests take over, become numerous and spread to other locations. This leaves us who do tend to our bees to have to deal with a larger quantity of invaders than we normally would. My bees will find these hives and raid them, bringing additional mites back to our hives and throwing off the calculations I use to track mite progress and treatment dates. Two years ago i had to deal with an insane amount of wax moths attempting to infest everything we had with any wax in it due to a local beekeeper losing their bees and leaving the empty hives in a field for a a year. Any time frames or a honey super came off a hive it had to immediately be wrapped in the plastic wrap used in shipping pallets in order to keep them out. It added alot of work and expense to the process.

    1. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So start a business checking on the hives of others.
      I'd love something simple like this. But I'm not going to put the time into learning the details of the bee life cycle & issues to do much more than turn a tap.

      Change me $50/year + 1 quart of honey, come out 2x per year to check on the hive, you'll have a deal.

      Call it being a 'bee wrangler' or some PC name like that

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question from a non-beekeeper:
      How would one of these poorly managed amateur hives be any worse than a colony of wild bees (which I assume must be rife with pests, mites, and fungi) moving in near your property?

    3. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're based in Australia and there are no varroa mites in Australia so maybe they are more interested in the local market.

    4. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that $50/year is really going to pay for the travel time and expenses. Right. We will all get right on that...

    5. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Somebody will.

      Probably the same guy (kid) who went door to door selling the new hives.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I'd very much like to know the answer to this too.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    7. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by paiute · · Score: 1
      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    8. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they just need to add maintenance services.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      So I've got to bust my ass to drive to your location and inspect your hives a couple of times a year for $50? No thanks.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    10. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by adolf · · Score: 1

      In a strange future where I can have a small hive that keeps my garden pollinated and provides me with the most local of local honey, and so do lots of other people near me, then: Why not?

      You also get to sell the hardware, a starter population, any ongoing bee-keeping supplies, and get paid (hourly) to advise and possibly sort out any problems you encounter while on-site.

      Personally, where I am, the market allows me to charge individuals no more than about $50 per hour to work on their PCs, so that's what I charge. If they're nearby and schedules don't conflict, I'll make housecalls without a trip charge.

      And yes, I'll drive a few miles to your house and inspect/tend to your PC for $50. What's the difference?

      (And if $50 isn't enough, what is?)

    11. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Yeah, everyone shooting down my idea doesn't get it very well. Probably never been in business for themselves.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    12. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am OP of the IMO, as a beekeeper... comment.
      feral hives have mostly been destroyed by varroa. I periodically speak to the recently retired head of worcester county beekeepers (the oldest county beekeeping association in the country) and he has stated that nearly all wild colonies of honeybees are gone from our state. But if they were not there would still be a great difference. Wild colonies do not live 20-30 hives on a single acre of land, as some beekeepers have them. Also, the living environment is very different between feral and kept colonies. This is apparent when you compare langstorth, warre and topbar hives. some of these methods attempt to more closely mimic natural conditions, but they are still not equivalent to the living conditions of wild colonies. In beekeeping we take actions to prevent the hives from leaving or swarming because this could cause us to lose a queen we find highly productive and want to keep in our gene pool and swarming also hurts honey production. But wild colonies will move, swarm freely and will often completely abandon a location if the environmental stresses grow to be too much.

    13. Re:IMO, as a beekeeper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm OP of the comment you replied to.
      I keep bees as a hobby, and keep 3-10 hives at a time. During swarm season i check them every 7 days looking for swarm cells. When i discover a hive needs manipulation (remove honeybound frames for drawn empty frames, swarm prevention split, etc...) this can sometimes consume my weekend. Taking responsibility of the hives of others during these critical timeframes is not really an option. Also, the $50 wouldn't even cover the costs of the gas or mite treatments. You also need to have the correct equipment properly stored on site, and i dont expect someone who doesn't care for their bees to have this.

  14. "Danger time"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What danger is there supposed to be?

  15. Political Bees by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    How will the notion of capitalism fair if the workers are deprived of the fruits of their labor? Will the bees fail to gather honey? How about supply and demand. As the bees are forced to labor to support humans as well as other bees the demand side goes way up but the supply side remains fixed. And with this new system is it a true trickle down, honey economy?

    1. Re:Political Bees by werepants · · Score: 1

      They do call it "robbing the hive", so at least they are honest about it.

  16. I dont get the honey thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a lot of fuss over bee vomit.

    1. Re:I dont get the honey thing... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      And alcohol is yeast shit.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  17. SCAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a scam. I've personally seen the hive, and it's all simply magic tricks underneath. The tap is physically connected to a large container of store-bought honey that's conveniently hidden within the hive for purposes of making a video.

  18. Almost over 3 million now! by azav · · Score: 1

    This is great. We as a planet need more bee tenders.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  19. RTFA by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    Although it would break with Slashdot tradition, I wish the complainers would read the fucking article. This product is designed to address ONE of the problems/duties associated with bee keeping.
    The promoters clearly advise anyone without bee keeping experience to contact and join a bee keeping club if they don't know what they're doing. They clearly state that the hives will also have to be inspected for diseases, pests etc, but that's not the specific problem this product is designed to solve.

    1. Re:RTFA by spazzmo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the "it's not absolutely perfect so it's rubbish" crowd should just keep their moronic childish opinions to themselves.

      --
      The cheese stands alone...
  20. Ok but by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Is there any impact on the bees from exposure to the plastic cells, is there any alteration of flavor of the honey from plastic cells, similar to that of a drinking from a plastic cup alters the flavor of soda or water?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  21. I tepidly agree. by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    But not enough that I don't think this is cool.
    1) Full supers are *heavy*.
    2) They don't lie: between the capping knife, the extractor, cleanup, needing to keep everything bee-tight... it's a bit of a pain.
    While the joy of going through "the process," and getting honey in the end, is damn rewarding, I have to say that it's also a Hell of a lot of work. While I think there are legitimate concerns for this product, it strikes me that "I don't like it because it's not the way I'm used to" is probably not a good argument. I used to use bee escapes, which certainly made life easier, but it was still the single most impacting element of keeping a hive. That being said, a lot has changed since I kept bees (CCD, mites, etc.), so I'm unsure what the long-term impact of this would be.

  22. Like some baby bees with that? by duckintheface · · Score: 1

    Sorry but this is ridiculous. For one thing, taking care of bees involves moving frames around for many reasons other than collection of honey. So you are not going to create a hive that never has to be opened. Honey collection is not the main reason for opening a hive.

    And bees to NOT obligingly lay their eggs only in the brood frames. There will be eggs, and thus baby bees in the honey section as well, so when you turn the tap you will get baby bees.

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    1. Re:Like some baby bees with that? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      They say that you still need to open the hive for brood inspection, which they typically do twice a year. They are advertising htis as reducing effort but not as a system in which you never need to open the hive.

    2. Re:Like some baby bees with that? by Rei · · Score: 1

      I'm not an apiarist (maybe in the future). But can't you use a queen excluder to keep her from laying eggs in honey supers? I'd expect that to be standard practice here.

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
    3. Re:Like some baby bees with that? by duckintheface · · Score: 2

      Yes, some beekeepers use a queen excluder. But they can cause problems. For example, worker bees, which can pass through the excluder, move eggs around all the time. So if they move an egg across the excluder into an area where the queen cannot spread her supression pheromone, the workers may decide to raise a new queen on the "wrong" side of the excluder. Also, you have the issue of worker-laid eggs which make up about 10% of all the eggs laid in a hive. If the queen pheromone is not stong enough in the "excluded" part of the hive, those worker eggs will be raised as queens.

      Nobody who raises bees only opens their hive twice a year. Once is enough to harvest honey. And honey can be harvested when the hive is opened for other reasons. So the reduction in work is miniscule and comes at a great cost in terms of equipment cost. Also, the exposure of honey on the tap is very dangerous to the hive because it will attract all kinds of parasites and bee preditors. Yellow jackets and Japanese hornets will be drawn to the honey and will end up attacking the hive.

      --
      "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    4. Re:Like some baby bees with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys are in, you know, Australia. Is it remotely possible their bee keeping practices are different from yours? We don't have a huge amount of Japanese hornets around these parts, and what the hell is a yellow jacket? Do they help school kids cross the road?

    5. Re:Like some baby bees with that? by Rei · · Score: 2

      It's an American thing

      And anyway, given how the device works, the concept that baby bees if present are going to flow out doesn't sound realistic. The device robs honey by opening up a small rift in the plastic comb that honey can slowly trickle through. Unless we're talking microscopic baby bees here, I can't see them passing through with the honey.

      --
      You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
  23. Unfortunately... by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    Wild bees have largely been dying out (at least, stateside), probably in no small part due to the pests described. Varroa mites, which are a relatively new nuisance, can have a dramatic impact on unmaintained hives.

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently wild colonies are not as susceptible to the mites:

        "Honey bees of the Arnot Forest: a population of feral colonies persisting with Varroa destructor in the northeastern United States." - Thomas D. Seeley, Apidologie, Volume 38, Number 1, January-February 2007 http://www.apidologie.org/articles/apido/ref/2007/01/m6063/m6063.html

      "Honey bee colonies that have survived Varroa destructor" - Yves Le Conte, Gérard de Vaublanc, DidierCrauser, François Jeanne, Jean-Claude Rousselle, Jean-Marc Bécard, http://www.apidologie.org/index.php?option=article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/apido/pdf/2007/06/m6118.pdf

      "Survival of mite infested (Varroa destructor) honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies in a Nordic climate" - Ingemar Fries, Anton Imdorf and Peter Rosenkranz
      http://www.apidologie.org/articles/apido/pdf/2006/05/m6039.pdf

  24. 5000 years? More like 100 years by darthsilun · · Score: 0

    It happens that I was just watching an episode of How Things Are Made about honey production on the Sci channel, and that said that bee frames were invented circa 1900, and before that harvesting honey meant killing all the bees.

  25. Better revolution in beekeeping by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    Would be breeding a better bee. One that is more resistant to mites, insecticides, wax moths, etc., and that isn't so susceptible to CCD.

    And also perhaps more efficient at pollenization. For example, the mason bee is supposedly a more efficient pollenizer than honeybees and will work in bad weather.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...

    These guys generally won't sting either.

    --PM

    1. Re:Better revolution in beekeeping by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Better solution would be not to haul the colonies of bees all over the country throughout the year to pollinate the cash crops in the first place as it leaves them in a continuously weakened state.

    2. Re:Better revolution in beekeeping by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Would be breeding a better bee. One that is more resistant to mites, insecticides, wax moths, etc., and that isn't so susceptible to CCD.

      Lots of people are working on this. One example is the Minnesota Hygienic Bee.

      Ironically, one such effort might be responsible for the introduction of the Varroa destructor mite to the West. Brother Adam was a very famous beekeeper living in England who tried to breed an improved bee--the so-called Buckfast bee--by crossing many types of honeybees that were imported from around the world--Italians, Germans, Asian bees, and even some African species. His goals were to breed a better bee after the Isle of Wight disease pretty much destroyed all native English bees.

      The ironic part is that the Varroa destructor mite (of Asian origin) was first discovered in England not far from Buckfast abbey, and it's believed that it was probably brought to England as part of one of Brother Adam's shipments.

    3. Re:Better revolution in beekeeping by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'd rather have tougher, more resistant bees.

        Monocultures aren't that great an idea, but they're unfortunately common. A big almond orchard wouldn't provide year-round food for the amount of honey bees required to pollinate it. Better to have mobile hives that can be taken where the bees can forage, and pollinate the crops.

      Yes, that's tough on bees. But its less disruptive to breed better bees than to rework all the orchards to provide year-round food for stationary hives.

      --PM

    4. Re:Better revolution in beekeeping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I'd rather have tougher, more resistant bees.

      What Could Possibly Go Wrong.

    5. Re:Better revolution in beekeeping by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      And so instead of fixing the underlying problem we'll put another band-aid on top and hope that it stops the bleeding. The problem is that one day we are going to run out of band-aids or that the bleeding will be too much.

      It may be less disruptive to keep the almond orchards but it's the better solution. Unfortunately almonds are making so much money that it won't happen. Not only would a varied crop rotation be better for the bees but it would be better for the water management of the regions. Almonds require a lot of water and the orchards are draining the aquifers dry. But they just drill deeper instead of using techniques to reduce water (for example, not planting so many almonds).

  26. TWO problems + several advantages. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Besides easier harvesting, their method produces honey without the wax honeycomb.
    Their frames are stacks of nearly complete hexagonal tubes which bees only finish off with wax, instead of building the entire chamber out of it.

    As wax production uses up more energy than honey production, bees will produce more honey, more often.
    It remains to be seen, but I am guessing that this will increase the number of harvest per year, possibly doubling them if there is enough food for the bees.

    No wax, or nearly no wax, means that the honey does not need to be thermally treated or strained to get the honey out of the wax.
    And that's a huge deal for the quality AND MORE IMPORTANTLY for the PERCEIVED quality.

    Ever heard that nonsense about how you should not be eating honey with a metal spoon, because evil?
    Honey strainers and extractors are made of what now?
    You may not be able to get the woo out of the people's heads, but you can at least profit from it while remaining HONEST.

    And no... It is not the metallic taste.
    It's the old pewter cutlery which contained LEAD which in turn caused people to get sick from using metallic eating utensils.
    That "folk wisdom" still goes around, centuries later, despite becoming obsolete centuries ago.

    Another effect is that they report a stronger aroma - as less of it is lost in the wax and thermal treatment.
    It is a higher quality, premium honey, of which there is more being produced, more often.
    Maybe it will finally become cheap enough that we won't have to worry if it is 100% the real thing or is there some HFCS added in to "make more of it".

  27. Honey on tap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://youtu.be/AF-kkb9jG1A

  28. Summary writing by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    This must be the first summary I've read on /. in over a dozen years that wasn't just a copy-pasted paragraph from the article. Kudos for that.

    On the other hand, I didn't much like the slant (which must be popular in the post-modern, green, politically-correct, think-of-everything-little, brave new world) of the first sentence.

    Hell yeah, I'm gonna prune that sucker of a peach tree in my back yard (or as you may prefer to put it: rob it of of it's precious, verdant, aspiring fire wood) despite the fact that peach trees grow just fine without pruning. Why? So that it can bear more precious, fragrant, soft, juicy fruit, of which I will rob it too. That's the whole point of planting a tree in my back yard (instead of burning fossil fuels to travel to some place thousands of miles away that has wild trees, just to collect a few.)

    Oh, and please get off my precious green lawn while you're at it.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  29. Why know something, when you can just guess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always funny to watch ./ comments on a subject domain outside of computers. Could you even imagine that everything you've learned about node.js might not equip you to make credible inferences about beekeeping?

    The summary of this piece is full of breathless hyperbole and is mostly unrelated to the actual experience of beekeeping, whether by the hobbyist or the professional.

    If you check out their Indigogo campaign, you'll note that the projected delivery date for the equipment, which is certainly going to slip badly from here given how overfunded they are, comes too late in 2015 to be useful for harvesting honey this season, at least in North America. So we're not going to have a popular consensus of the pros and cons of this thing until mid-2016.

    Oh, and hey, did anyone mention that you typically don't harvest any honey in the first year you have your hive? So for any beginners starting out with this thing, you won't get to try it until 2017.

    I've still got the one Langstroth out there, it would be interesting to give it a go (the rest are all Top Bar now). Kudos to the comment on how you'll be able to pick up a secondhand unit cheap for the disillusioned!

    A good thing if it helps boot up some new mindful beekeepers, yes. But a revolution? Give me a way to bet my actual money against that one, please.

  30. $230? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some plastic? Fuck that.