Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

New Images From Mangalyaan

Posted by timothy on from the way-up-there dept.

schwit1 writes Indian scientists have released a new set of color images taken by their Mars orbiter, Mangalyaan. Arsia Mons is one of the three giant volcanoes to the east of Mars' biggest volcano, Olympus Mons. Arsia Mons is important for future manned colonization, as there are known caves on its western flanks. In addition, those western flanks show solid evidence of past glaciers, which means that it is very likely that those caves will harbor significant quantities of water-ice, making settlement much easier.

37 comments

  1. Caves, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why don't we ever send the rovers to cool places like this???

    1. Re:Caves, etc. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      because bad things always happen in sci fi when you go into a cave. It's the natural equivalent of the red shirt. Hell, the whole damned planet is red!

      I would note that you couldn't use solar panels in caves; and communication with Earth would require relay station(s). There are solutions, but they do jack up the costs.

      --
      Table-ized A.I.
    2. Re:Caves, etc. by itzly · · Score: 1

      And have them get stuck in a cave where we don't have radio contact ?

    3. Re:Caves, etc. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Because exploring caves is difficult and dangerous work even for the dexterous and adaptable humans. Robo-tech might be just about up to it on earth - but not to making the exploration with a near-zero accident rate, in an unmapped environment, on a weight budget, operating for years without servicing, after spending months in storage.

      It's going to take decades of robotic-technology advancement before we can consider something like that. Or a manned mission, which would be ridiculously expensive.

    4. Re:Caves, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still wish NASA had landed the Huygens probe in one of the seas on Titan.

    5. Re:Caves, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because caves don't have sunlight. Or do you think rovers have batteries with unlimited power?

    6. Re:Caves, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If NASA would had being the one doing Huygens it would had being a full success. But the project was done by ESA (European Space Agency, in case you are didn't know) and they have a history of reaching the target location, just to end up with a spectacular failure.

      Huygens failure was caused by a moron at ESA setting up an unscheduled disruptive test that disabled 50% of the communication channels (just hours before the schedule drop of the prove) and NEVER reseting the system to restart them. The final result was a successful drop with incomplete telemetry and data.

    7. Re:Caves, etc. by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      Curiosity has it's own nuclear reactor.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  2. The way is shut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1


    The way is shut.
    It was made by those who are Dead.
    And the Dead keep it.
    The way is shut.

  3. lol, space nutters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Yes, science has produced wonderful things. But we already have enough tech to feed a stable world population, so scientists should really be tasked with effective education and resource distribution before continuing exploring anything a few million miles away. If they want more resources for shooting up to space then they can prove themselves on the ground first. If they manage to solve the problems here, give them whatever they want. If they can't, maybe they're not as bright as they thought they were.

    1. Re: lol, space nutters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is not the job of the people with the knowledge and drive for space to solve those problems. Others are tasked with it and are falling, comparing solving the problems of space exploration to world hunger is comparing apples to banana peels.

    2. Re: lol, space nutters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if people with brains were not given the resources to dick about when they could be solving more pressing problems, we wouldn't be tasking less capable people who - as you say - are failing.

    3. Re:lol, space nutters. by Alrescha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...we already have enough tech to feed a stable world population, so scientists should really be tasked with effective education and resource distribution before..."

      Do you seriously believe that this is a *technical* problem?

      Let me be blunt. The only reason the world is not fed, clothed, housed, etc. is because there is a significant percentage of the population that does not want that to happen.

      This is a social/political problem, not a technical one.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    4. Re:lol, space nutters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans are complex machines. Establishing how they work and fixing their faults is a technical problem.

    5. Re:lol, space nutters. by Alrescha · · Score: 2

      "Humans are complex machines. Establishing how they work and fixing their faults is a technical problem."

      That's one point of view. I prefer this one:

      "If there is such a phenomenon as absolute evil, it consists in treating another human being as a thing."
                                      -- John Brunner, The Shockwave Rider.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    6. Re:lol, space nutters. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Present problem in supporting people with food, clothes, housing, education etc. is not a production problem, but a distribution problem. Therefore, the problem must be solved by politics and economics, and these domains are not doing their job. Tech is not the limiting factor. In Africa, hunger could be dealt with even without food supplies from outside, if all the fertile soil could be used. However, large parts cannot be used because of wars or are destroyed by war. In addition Western subventions and over production cause additional stress on market prices pushing farmers out of their business, and finally using their soil to produce soja for our animals reduces their productive capabilities further. All these problems and several others can all be fixed with different politics. So go and ask them to do their work.

    7. Re: lol, space nutters. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      So we shall all go into politics? Most technicians would not stand a chance in that rat cage. If you are really interesting in solving these problems, then look into the way how these areas are shaped by politics.

    8. Re:lol, space nutters. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      If you see humans in this way then you have to address the right technicians to solve the problem. Metal machine people are not the right ones to fix issues in communication and faulty data in the central thinking machine.

      The truth is. Our present problems are not technical. They are organizational. To solve them people working in these areas must fix it.

    9. Re:lol, space nutters. by itzly · · Score: 1

      Africa, hunger could be dealt with even without food supplies from outside, if all the fertile soil could be used

      Africa's biggest problem is not a distribution problem. It's the Africans.

    10. Re:lol, space nutters. by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "...but a distribution problem"

      I believe you mean well, but using a phrase like this implies we don't know how to distribute our resources, i.e. that is is a technical issue we do not know how to solve. That's not the case - we've been engaging in land wars since the beginning of time - we know how to get stuff where it is needed.

      I believe the problem is multi-faceted, but it boils down to:

      1) Not my problem
      2) Not in my back yard
      3) Not with any contribution from me

        - all while sitting complacently on our piles of gold like Smaug.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    11. Re:lol, space nutters. by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "The truth is. Our present problems are not technical. They are organizational."

      I'm sorry, but no. Our present problem is that as a community, people *suck*. There is no technical, organizational, or practical problem keeping us from feeding, housing, or caring for the unfortunate. We just don't *want* to. People suck.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    12. Re:lol, space nutters. by itzly · · Score: 1

      I'll be happy to distribute some of my resources, but only in return for something of equal value.

    13. Re:lol, space nutters. by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      Thank you for illustrating the problem so succinctly.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    14. Re:lol, space nutters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      No, people don't suck - the truth is, that on a global scale, I don't give a shit what happens to somebody I've never met, will never meet, and don't even know exists, in southeast bumfuck, Vietnam, and likewise, I don't expect that person to give a juicy fart's worth of care to MY existence.

      I know this will shock all you "Global Citizens" here on Slashdot, but it's human nature (and in fact, there's some research to support this - google Dunbar's Number sometime) that there's a fairly limited scope of people you "really care about" - and for most of us, people outside those circles of caring are simply not all that important.

      Now that doesn't mean it's okay to actively wish others harm... and I dare say that most of us would be hard-pressed to refuse to help a single stranger (or small group of strangers) in obvious distress. However, trying to make "7 billion people are miserable" my personal, relatable problem, is a fool's errand. I honestly don't care about "7 billion people." The REAL trick is to get *everybody* to care about (and for) the small number of people they know, and actually care about - this distributes the problem handily and makes everybody responsible for pitching in to help out "the people they care about" - done on a wide scale... this would eliminate the problem.

      Problems like this are solved by HUMANIZING them. Not by shouting at people and trying to "shame" them into caring. It's why images of disaster areas, war zones, and other places where people are suffering are so effective at triggering aid responses: when we see *actual people* suffering, we want to help. When you sit there talking shit about how "5 billion faceless hypothetical people are miserable, and you need to do something about that," the brain just shuts off.

    15. Re:lol, space nutters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the point if we're all going to die when the sun starts going red giant? If we ever want to extend the life of humanity beyond the next one billion years, we need to start exploring space right now.

      You want money to fund all of that bullshit you spouted? Cut military funding. They waste far more money than anything else and are unnecessary. Also, outlaw all organised religion. A boatload of money could be saved there too with the more important goal being to get humanity away from belief in faerie tales and superstition. Elimination of military and religion would go a long way towards unifying humanity and allowing us to advance.

    16. Re:lol, space nutters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we could appeal to wooowoo if you want, and see how far denial of reality gets us, but the fact is that a human being is a physical thing.

      This doesn't mean that a human isn't a thing complex enough to experience suffering, nor does it precluding optimising the reduction of suffering. But humans are still things which can be studied and manipulated for good or evil.

    17. Re:lol, space nutters. by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "However, trying to make "7 billion people are miserable" my personal, relatable problem, is a fool's errand."

      Sorry, my cowardly friend, but I never said anything about 7 billion people. That's your straw man, you can keep it.

      A convenient small-town example of 'not in my backyard', this reads like a whole lot of suck to me:

      http://www.bostonmagazine.com/...

      The tl;dr summary quote (paraphrased) is "they [the homeless] really would be better served in the next town over.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    18. Re: lol, space nutters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if people with brains were not given the resources to dick about when they could be solving more pressing problems, we wouldn't be tasking less capable people who - as you say - are failing.

      Less capable like yourself?

      NASA FY 2014 budget: $17.647 billion (Fiscal Year 2014, about 0.5% of total budget at about $3 trillion)

      Please shut up.

  4. images shut down - anyone have mirrors? by lkcl · · Score: 1

    the newspaper has terminated display of the images - does anyone have a mirror site or know an alternative location where they can be viewed?

    1. Re:images shut down - anyone have mirrors? by lkcl · · Score: 2

      pictures here:
      https://www.facebook.com/isrom...
      http://www.vipnews.in/index.ph...

    2. Re:images shut down - anyone have mirrors? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 3, Informative

      Official Site:
      http://www.isro.gov.in/pslv-c2...

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    3. Re:images shut down - anyone have mirrors? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Try slashdot :D

      (Streisand was here)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Frozen fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Settle on or near the frozen sea and mine it for frozen fish...

  6. Under the red soil, Mars is blue by SternisheFan · · Score: 2
    Recent NASA photo that shows under the red soil, Mars is blue, courtesy of Curiosity's drill bit...

    http://www.nasa.gov/sites/defa...

    1. Re:Under the red soil, Mars is blue by itzly · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not blue, that's white and gold.

    2. Re:Under the red soil, Mars is blue by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      I found the photo from this Reddit site here: http://www.reddit.com/r/space/...

  7. Glacial ice does not fill lava tubes by amightywind · · Score: -1

    In addition, those western flanks show solid evidence of past glaciers

    I know of no instance on earth where glacial ice fills lava tubes. Lava tubes are fragile. Glaciers are very destructive. What plausible process exists where ice will non-destructively fill lava tubes? Earth has thousands of volcanoes and lots of glaciation. Mars has neither. This is a ridiculous statement even for slashdot. The Indian Mars images are impressive, for 1970.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good