Slashdot Mirror


Energy-Generating Fabric Set To Power Battery-Free Wearables

An anonymous reader writes A team of researchers in Korea and Australia have developed a flexible fabric which generates power from human movement – a breakthrough which could replace batteries in future wearable devices. The effect of the fabric's nanogenerators mirrors static electricity with the two fabrics repeatedly brushing against each other and stealing electrons from the one another – this exchange creates energy from the wearer's activity without the need for an external power source. During testing, the researchers demonstrated the nanogenerator powering a number of devices such as LEDs, a liquid crystal display, as well as a keyless car entry system embedded in a nanogenerator 'power suit'.

40 comments

  1. The only problems being by Samuel+Dravis · · Score: 1

    1. You have to wear that specific garment; 2. You have to get the power from the garment to the device. It isn't going to happen. Just give us a better battery.

    1. Re:The only problems being by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) If it's a jacket, that isn't a problem. Eventually your entire wardrobe might be made with this technology.
      2) Wireless power.

    2. Re:The only problems being by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      And here I thought that static electricity was the friend of sensitive electronics.

    3. Re:The only problems being by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. military garment

      2. military device

    4. Re:The only problems being by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just give us a better battery.

      I'm surprised no one ever thought of this. What are they thinking?? I mean, it seems so obvious.

    5. Re:The only problems being by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What are they thinking??

      I think they're still building a better mousetrap. Batteries come next.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:The only problems being by Hussman32 · · Score: 1

      The jacket is a good idea (not as many times in the laundry). Wireless power? How? Induction, ultrasonic? They'll have too much attenuation loss.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
  2. Soon enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon enough once they finish the SkyNet AI it will take over the world and enslave us all into containers where our body heat will be used as 'human batteries' to power the Matrix...

  3. Unlimited power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Make power underwear

    2. Connect it to a compact Orgamorator.

    3. Switch it on!

    4. Profit!

  4. Swimwear by mbstone · · Score: 1

    1. Get swim suit made of magic fabric.
    2. Swim, thereby heating the pool.
    3. Say goodbye to expensive pool-heating bills!

    1. Re:Swimwear by jklovanc · · Score: 2

      Lets spend hundreds of dollars on expensive fabric that that may be ruined in the wash instead of using a 49 cent battery, Lol. I guess fabric softener is out of the question.

    2. Re:Swimwear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you pee in the pool, it'll get warmer too..

  5. better yet by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    build a track suit, generate power from running, use this for cooling, stick a little hamster logo on it...

  6. But I never move! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much power can be generated from me moving my hand to and from the Cheetos packet?

    1. Re: But I never move! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.21 nanowatts.

  7. automatic watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been made for years by Citizen, Seiko, etc for years

  8. Considering how fat Republicans are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this will mean they get more free power which will make them even wealthier. This needs to be banned.

    1. Re:Considering how fat Republicans are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      this will mean they get more free power which will make them even wealthier. This needs to be banned.

      Free power.
      Plus a $0.01 distribution fee.
      Plus a $0.02 energy tax.
      Plus a $0.01 fee to support the power companies losing business.
      Plus a $0.005 generation fee.
      Plus...

    2. Re:Considering how fat Republicans are... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Power wants to be free

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Considering how fat Republicans are... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I think you need to see some 350 lbs. crack whores buying orange drink and ding dongs with their SNAP card. They vote Democrat.

  9. Nylon suit on office carpet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been generating electricity for years, baby!

  10. So a coat it silly, but what about...? by gilgongo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I agree that putting the fabric inside a coat demonstrates a naive view of human factors (you can't wash the coat, you have to wear it all the time, etc.), I wonder if this might simply be the first idea they had after developing the invention?

    Fabric generating power from movement would seem to have applications in other places: sails on boats; flags flying on buildings; tarpaulins on trucks, maybe quite a few others if the fabric is sufficiently robust enough.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re: So a coat it silly, but what about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flags flying on buildings? American suburban homes will practically power themselves!

    2. Re:So a coat it silly, but what about...? by loufoque · · Score: 1

      People typically don't wash coats and typically wear them every day and all the time when they're outside (in winter that is).

    3. Re:So a coat it silly, but what about...? by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      if it was that efficient, they would have chosen a windmill demonstrator.

      it's not that efficient, so they chose this demonstrator. if it provided enough power to charge a phone, they would have had that on the demonstrator. all their uses could be done with a tiny solar cell.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re: So a coat it silly, but what about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On buildings we could put up a wind generator. Same with a boat or truck if they didn't have a better power source.

      And while you could have a wind up device to store power, this is for doing so without deliberately acting. So pow power usages only.

    5. Re:So a coat it silly, but what about...? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Except that wearables that light up tend to be worn in dark places, so a solar cell won't work. I don't see the nanogenerator fabric being practical for mainstream clothing in the near term but it will be great for costume wearables.

  11. Patent protection by jrumney · · Score: 1

    I call prior art

  12. How do you clean it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that I wash my clothes from time to time, how would this go through my mums washing machine? How would it react to me pouring fizzy drink on myself from time to time? I don't get out much, but it would be cool if this had some kind of solar aspect to it. I've always wanted to be more like a plant.

    1. Re:How do you clean it? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Presumably the answer is: you wash it, and it still works.

      No idea if this prototype has that property, but it very well might. (I didn't RTFA.) You can wash LilyPads, can't you?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  13. Re:fuckface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's only one part that should smell like fish and it's not your anus and it doesn't apply to dudes.

  14. Australian science - and what it has become by virens · · Score: 1
    I know that I'm ruining my karma by posting this, but I'll do it anyway.

    I am sick of those attention whores in Australian universities - those chinese and indians who do whatever they can to attract attention and push their funding agenda. I'm tired of articles like this, that claim a "breakthrough" when there is nothing even remotely near a good, reproducible and insightful science. It must be stopped, but unfortunately this means that a substantial bulk of those pseudoscience schmucks will be thrown away, and I know that it is not going to happen.

    The other week we had a chinese paper shill Xinhua Wu from Monash Uni whose intellectual capacity was enough for taking apart a decades-old jet engine and using 20-years-old 3D-printing technology to replicate a non-working (!) mockup. This time we have korean morons (you know, Jianjian Lin and Jung Ho Kim are typical Australian names) who claim a "revolution" again, and I'm quoting:

    A high output voltage and current of about 120 V and 65 microA, respectively, were observed from a nanopatterned PDMS-based WTNG, while an output voltage and current of 30 V and 20 microA were obtained by the non-nanopatterned flat PDMS-based WTNG under the same compressive force

    Slashdot crowd, can you hear me? MICROAMPERS! How many decades you need to wear this crap to charge even a small battery? How many shitty articles like this do we need to understand that those korean morons will never come up with anything but insignificant incremental improvements?! How many times do we have to get depressed to realize that University of Wollongong, Australia, is nowhere near top-20 ozzie universities and has never done anything remotely important?

  15. Better way to do this... by jddj · · Score: 1

    Corduroy Pants and thigh-mounted thermocouples. Could maybe power a Peltier Chiller all up in there...

  16. The 70s called by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    You want to produce power with clothing? Just bring back cheap polyester clothing. The static discharge alone would power an iWatch.

    Yes, lets call it an iWatch just to piss off apple marketing and branding idiots.

  17. Great Christmas present! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now not only can you can go around shocking people by dragging your feet on the carpet but you can REALLY zap them with a wave of your arms.

    I can't wait to see how many cell phones, computers, monitors, etc. are damaged by this.

  18. miniscule amount of power makes it pointless by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    I can power all the devices the summary lists with two coins stuck lemon juice or a potato, A mere 1.1 mW? A single "D" alkaline battery would last for a year and a couple months at that power level.

    1. Re: miniscule amount of power makes it pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they could make it demand dependent -- more energy used requires more energy input. So, to use walking to power your cell phone the material would feel really stiff and it'd be like walking through taffy.

    2. Re:miniscule amount of power makes it pointless by dan42 · · Score: 1

      "the technology still producing electricity after over 12,000 compression and release cycles" So, assuming an average walking speed that's about *2 hours* before you need new pants. Washing the clothes would most definitely wear them out! And think about what detergent would do to this...

  19. First thing I thought of... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    How about flags? It's windy as heck here, and putting up a flag is about as easy as anything ever gets. You get a lot of motion, at least in this neck of the woods.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.