Slashdot Mirror


The Internet of Things Just Found Your Lost Wallet

Nerval's Lobster writes Ever forgotten your wallet in a coffee shop or restaurant? Now there's a way to ensure it'll never happen again: Woolet, which its creators bill as a "smart wallet." It features a rechargeable battery, Bluetooth support, and the ability to synchronize with a smartphone app; if you walk 20-85 feet away from your wallet, the app will make a sound and guide you back to it. The platform's being financed on Kickstarter, and attracted attention from TechCrunch and some other places, but it begs the question: is this yet another example of connected devices run amok—shiny and interesting as a concept but not nearly useful enough for the population at large? What would it take for a connected device, whether a wallet or a smoke detector, to gain mass appeal?

108 comments

  1. iPocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Helps me track the position of my wallet in real-time.

    1. Re:iPocket by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      just wait for the IOT ass wiper

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  2. anyone this cutting edge by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    probably doesn't even have a wallet

    keys, credit card, id, etc.: there's an app for that

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:anyone this cutting edge by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      An App for ID? Sure. When you get stopped by the police just hand them your cellphone so they can sync it in their squad car.

    2. Re:anyone this cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just as stupid and useless (to the average person) as all of the other Internet of Things crap...Its all uterly usless except to those who wish to spy on us all for their own purposes and/or profits. To anyone else the Internet of Things us not only useless, but detrimental! Very few (if any) home appliances need an Internet connection to function, and making them so they won't work without one is just wrong!

    3. Re:anyone this cutting edge by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      the Internet of Things us not only useless, but detrimental

      You've got it all wrong. It's the Internet of Other People's Things That You Use To Serve Their Interests which is detrimental. But as soon as we go from there to the Internet of Your Things Intended to Serve Your Interests Above All Others, this stuff is unambiguously good. All it takes to do this stuff right, is to not buy it. Build it. Just like your desktop PC, your server, and hopefully pretty soon, your phone. (I'm surprised by how feasible that last one is getting. I bet in 5-10 years a significant fraction of "typical nerds" will be using their own phones. It might still have a spy on board, but the spy will have very limited access.)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    4. Re:anyone this cutting edge by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      There are already Bluetooth tags small enough to put in your wallet which do the same thing, and they cost $10-$25, not the $80 being asked for one of these wallets pre-order.

      Not something I'd invest in. It's already being done just as well, cheaper. In fact it's probably not even patentable, because it's not transformative at all. It's just two existing products put together.

    5. Re:anyone this cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As compared with modern PC's which have NSA backdoors built directly into the CPU, you mean ;p

    6. Re:anyone this cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say the same.

      But I believe you will (if it isn't already available) have a small chip imbedded in your arm or your "smart watch" will be scanned to pay your bill/tab.. Really stupid "invention" "lets create an app in a time when you can just about buy everything without a wallet". Idiots!!!

  3. We'll see if it actually charges by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    ... this is where this idea always falls apart.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:We'll see if it actually charges by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      This might be more useful in reverse. Set it for 10 feet and really loud. If someone steals your phone, an alarm goes off when they get a certain distance away.

    2. Re:We'll see if it actually charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, that's the only way to bill it. Who cares if you lost your wallet? That's your mistake. Whoops, try not to let it happen again. Someone stole your wallet? Now people can get righteous about something! Time for some street justice on that fool that thought he could make off with your stuff. The next technological step would be to have the wallet project a target icon somewhere on the thief.

  4. So when you lose your phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you can use your wallet to find it? Anyway, this is more a solution in search for a problem.

    I've forgotten my phone occasionally but never my wallet. While YMMV, I just don't see this as something that needs to happen.

    I also don't see why Dice is advertising it (bloody Nerval). What does this product got to do with you? Do you really need to link to your own site?

  5. Power is finite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now if you leave the wallet and the battery dies it can't alert you but the fact you aren't being alerted leads you to believe you have your wallet on your person and you continue on your merry way.
    I'll stick with my dumb wallet.

    1. Re:Power is finite by taustin · · Score: 2

      I suspect it's more that the app on your phone is a deadman switch. It goes off when it stops detecting the wallet. Which means that when the batteries in the wallet go dead, your phone makes annoying noise.

      I can't help but wonder if they're smart enough to have a way to simply turn the app off and leave it off when you're away from the charger. (I cannot, of course, be bothered to read the article to find out.)

    2. Re:Power is finite by thephydes · · Score: 1

      yes. I lost my mobile phone (cellphone) and it was found by a car detailing firm when I was to sell my car - actually under the passenger seat but that's another story. IOT we really aren't there yet I believe - 'specially for oldies like me who don't own or want to own a smartphone.

    3. Re:Power is finite by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I own a neutered smartphone. I use it over wifi or my pocket sized cellular wifi router (which is pay-as-you-go). It's a challenge keeping a cheap neutered smartphone happy, because it's a cheap but nice (Gorilla Glass, Android 4.4, etc.) Boost Android phone that was only $40 and Boost seems sort of upset that I've not activated it. It demands to activate every time it's rebooted, with long timeouts when it is disabled from use unless I press the 'activate' button. All avoided by seldom ever powering it down. It's rooted but I haven't figured yet where to snip those particular wires in the filesystem.

      This isn't really the 'Internet of Things' doing much of anything, though. The wallet runs an offline-beacon transceiver that isn't using the IP protocol for anything. It's an IoT hype story.

  6. Awesome! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Internet of Things and a Kickstarter Slashvertisement combined. For the nitpicky, we can even debate the proper use of "begs the question". All it really needs is something about 3D printing and some angle about getting more women into technology, and it would be perfect. Something for everyone!

    Also... wait, did they just describe this as a "platform"? People are going to write apps for this or something?

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    1. Re:Awesome! by pspahn · · Score: 4, Funny

      A fool and his ... wait.. shit. I guess a fool and his smart wallet are soon pa ... wait ... this is pointless.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:Awesome! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Heh, I have no points and I must mod.

      They WILL write apps for it oh yes but...pwny apps.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    3. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about asking when systemd is going to include it.

    4. Re:Awesome! by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Can you 3D print it? Buy it with Bitcoins?

  7. Or you could just... by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Or you could just use one of those combined wallet/phone cases if you're losing it all the time. Either way, your wallet is going to be a little bigger.

    1. Re:Or you could just... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, my billfold-style phone case has pretty much become my day to day wallet. It holds the bank cards I need, my bus pass and drivers license, and also what little cash I ever carry around. When I leave for work in the morning, I grab my phone and I'm pretty much set.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  8. Less gadgets, more serious systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like this epipen smart case http://gizmodo.com/a-smart-epipen-case-lets-family-know-youre-having-an-al-1677633589 or this real-time parking assist http://techonomy.com/2014/12/streetlines-zia-yusuf-using-data-take-pain-parking/.

    1. Re:Less gadgets, more serious systems by LexxOne · · Score: 1

      My 10 year old is severely peanut allergic. This is awesome!

  9. Taking advantage of the falling euro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the dollar getting stronger and the euro weaker, people with money will flock to the old world for cheap vacations. It also so happens that's the prime location for pick pockets so having an aliens style movement detector to help locate your wallet and the little shit that sole it will come in handy.

  10. How about baked in, not strapped on security? by mlts · · Score: 2

    The big problem I see with IoT devices is focusing on the sizzle... and there is little, to any effort focused on security. With how inexpensive 3G boards are, it is easy to get a device online with its own Internet connection... but why should it be connected even in the first place?

    What is wrong with having devices in a house communicate to a central server that has a hardened Internet connection, and that communicates out/in? This way, it lowers the attack surface from being able to nail the device from anywhere on the Internet to having to be in radio range of the item.

    Even with that, there is really no point for most of the uses of Internet connected items in the first place, and because budgets usually place security dead last, they are just disasters waiting to happen, especially when the only way to fix the security exploits would likely be to replace the entire device.

    1. Re:How about baked in, not strapped on security? by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of IoT implementation have that idea of a central server. There is nothing wrong with it, but even then, IP still comes in handy because so many integration issues are already solved. For instance, there are existing IETF protocols for device discovery currently used for devices like printers that would work well for other devices as well.

  11. A chain by darkain · · Score: 2

    OR how about just get a chain for your wallet? Sometimes low tech is the best tech. Don't lose your shit in the first place.

    1. Re:A chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the business-inclined (read: the people most likely to have the disposable income to waste on frivolous things like this), chains are not a part of Business Casual or Formal wear of any type.

    2. Re:A chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but hand-cuffs are.

  12. rechargeable battery? by networkzombie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I already can't leave the house without charging my Bluetooth headset, my Fitbit, my iPhone, my iPad, my Kindle, my iPod, my MacBook, and my iWatch. Now I'll need to charge my wallet.

    1. Re:rechargeable battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      if you have all those expensive rechargeable devices, you probably have even more e and/or i-shit.. so what the hell you need a wallet for? you surely don't have any cash or usable credit cards, nor any pictures of a current girlfriend or wife, to store in it.

    2. Re:rechargeable battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you start to charge your brain and get rid of some of the crap you do not need when "usually" going out?

      I am very happy with my S5230. Yes, it is not a smartphone. But it phones, stores contacts - and stays charged for 7 to 14 days, depending on how much I use it. Beat that, Any Smartphone 6.0!

    3. Re:rechargeable battery? by Severus+Snape · · Score: 2

      I already can't leave the house without charging my Bluetooth headset, my Fitbit, my iPhone, my iPad, my Kindle, my iPod, my MacBook, and my iWatch. Now I'll need to charge my wallet.

      I'm guessing you're probably trying to be funny..but 2 year battery life - it will also charge through recycling heat or kinetic energy.

    4. Re:rechargeable battery? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      A lot of redundancy in all of that. And no, you don't have an iWatch.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    5. Re:rechargeable battery? by said_captain_said_wo · · Score: 1

      While some coin cells can last years in very low power applications, you'd probably do better using Gen-2 RFID tags for just finding something. The tags are powered over the air by the device reading them and do not require batteries.

    6. Re:rechargeable battery? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Max 3 meter range for passive rfid.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    7. Re:rechargeable battery? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Now I'll need to charge my wallet.

      Just use your charge card.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  13. IoT meme already past sell by date by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    What would it take for a connected device, whether a wallet or a smoke detector, to gain mass appeal?

    It will take a few billion more in marketing campaigns to get people to care.

    Once they do you have a short while until your customers begin notice how worthless and or dangerous their purchase turned out to be.

    1. Re:IoT meme already past sell by date by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      This isn't IoT in the first place. The wallet has a beacon. It isn't connected to the Internet nor does it really make use of Internet Protocols.

  14. IOT is suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you want to be the next victim of a Stuxnet-like attack, do not connect your Things to the internet. What you want is LAN of things, under your control, and airgapped from any computer owned or controlled by non-you persons.

    Yes, I know Stuxnet breached an airgap. That's because an airgap is necessary, not sufficient.

    1. Re:IOT is suicide by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      It is not event an example of IoT. The wallet doesn't connect to the internet, it sends a signal to a smartphone app and the smartphone app starts crying when it no longer recevies the signal. Kind of Tamagochi. At no point internet is involved. So, why the OP talked about IoT in first place? Did he lost his mind? That's why he connected his brain on the internet so that /. can alert him he lost his mind?

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    2. Re:IOT is suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should read the first three words of the headline.

    3. Re:IOT is suicide by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should stop believing the headlines and think for yourself about what is discussed in TFA. Did you read if, btw?

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    4. Re:IOT is suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the headline is not representative of TFA, maybe Slashdot should stop posting misleading headlines.

  15. There's a cheaper solution by msobkow · · Score: 2

    There's a cheaper solution. I believe it's called a "trucker's chain." Even if your wallet falls out of your pocket, it just dangles a foot or two below your belt loops.

    It never runs out of batteries, doesn't require installing an app, doesn't require a smartphone, and doesn't let the whole world know you forgot your wallet by blaring sound effects.

    What I really have to laugh at is the fact that now you have to carry both your wallet and your smartphone with you all the time for this concept to work. I don't mind carrying my wallet all the time, but being forced to carry the smartphone just to keep the wallet quiet seems kind of asinine to me.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:There's a cheaper solution by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yup. I have my wallet & phone on lanyards, the type you hang a conference pass or door card on.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:There's a cheaper solution by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      Another advantage being that your wallet won't sit there alerting everyone to the fact that its owner isn't anywhere nearby...

    3. Re:There's a cheaper solution by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      There's a cheaper solution. I believe it's called a "trucker's chain."

      But this thing has the advantage of alerting all thieves in your vicinity that you have money to burn on fancy electronics, the precise location of your wallet, and whether it's in your possesion or you've just lost it.

    4. Re:There's a cheaper solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's a cheaper solution. I believe it's called a "trucker's chain." Even if your wallet falls out of your pocket, it just dangles a foot or two below your belt loops.

      Yeah, this is how I learned to stop losing my wallet. I only had to have the chain pull it off the counter and dump all the contents on the floor at the bank three times...

      What I really have to laugh at is the fact that now you have to carry both your wallet and your smartphone with you all the time for this concept to work. I don't mind carrying my wallet all the time, but being forced to carry the smartphone just to keep the wallet quiet seems kind of asinine to me.

      The majority of us carry our smartphones all the time. Maybe not around our dwelling, or when we are naked, but pretty much at all other times.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:There's a cheaper solution by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      What I really have to laugh at is the fact that now you have to carry both your wallet and your smartphone with you all the time for this concept to work.

      Isn't that what most people do anyway? That, plus a keyring.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:There's a cheaper solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. I stopped carrying it all the time. In fact I switched back to a flip phone. Personal choice, but I'm a lot happier, less stressed and far more productive. Don't get me wrong, it;s a nice toy and I still use it when I sit on the couch (iPad is too clunky) and once in awhile in bed, but having that damn thing with me all the time was obnoxious.

    7. Re:There's a cheaper solution by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Beep Beep. If I don't have my phone with me, I don't feel at all safe or connected. Beep Beep.

      Beep Beep

    8. Re:There's a cheaper solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I really have to laugh at is the fact that now you have to carry both your wallet and your smartphone with you all the time for this concept to work.

      Exactly! I would give the summary one little tweak:

      "Ever forgotten your wallet and your smartphone in a coffee shop or restaurant?"

    9. Re:There's a cheaper solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Beep Beep. If I don't have my phone with me, I don't feel at all safe or connected. Beep Beep.

      Wow, you're quite pathetic, eh? I simply find that if I don't have my phone with me, I can't use it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:There's a cheaper solution by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Trucker wallets have zippers. I call "bullshit" on your story of dumping the contents of your wallet by pulling on the chain.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    11. Re:There's a cheaper solution by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Trucker wallets have zippers. I call "bullshit" on your story of dumping the contents of your wallet by pulling on the chain.

      This is a story about having a chain on a wallet, not about having precisely whatever you imagined I had.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Give me one for my glasses and I am sold by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Give me a way I can link my smartphone to my prescription sunnies (without compromising their use as sunnies) and I am very much interested (says the guy who has lost many pairs of sunnies over the years and only recently lost yet another pair)

  17. The Internet of Things??? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    oh you mean the IoT!

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:The Internet of Things??? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      I work in marketing & my current task is finding the Interested Demographic of the Internet Of Things.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  18. Metal detector dudes of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it'll spawn the retired metal detector dude of the future. He could use a device to comb beaches for lost wallets.

  19. Use cases? Use cases??? by Severus+Snape · · Score: 1

    I get why many people will probably see this as a gimick but as someone who loses fucking everything, I think this is _really_really_ cool and after reading in to it, seems like the guys behind it know their shit. It is certainly a well thought out design. Sure I can wear a truckers chain, as other people have mentioned but I'm in my 20's - I could never imagine wearing one of those. While practical, they are clunky and would only serve to annoy.

  20. Metrosexual alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just fess up. You carry a purse.

    1. Re:Metrosexual alert! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The fact that he carries his phone/wallet in a fanny pack doesn't make the phone/wallet a purse.

      There are other considerations, of course.

    2. Re:Metrosexual alert! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Well, sometimes this case does feel as large as some purses... but, all in all, I'm happy with it.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  21. Re:I've lost my wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on a public bus, library, restaurants, even was stolen, tossed along the road later. Some ppl found my license and called me back. It's survived with me over 15 years. And that's special. I don't want biker intercourse to ruin that, but it will just like it will ruin everything else.

    FTFY

    Captcha: tolerate

    No can do I'm intolerant when it comes to intolerant people.

  22. Reinventing the round thing. by RatOfTheLab · · Score: 2

    Apart from being wallet-specifc, seems similar to lapa-app.com (the latter offers tiny devices that you can attach to things you might lose so you can be alerted if you're in the process of losing said things.. bung one in a wallet, job done)

  23. I don't have a wallet by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    And I never in my life would leave a bunch of money lying on the counter anywhere.

    This must be for girls, they have more like a big leather 3 pound photo album/scrapbook thingie that they name 'wallet'.

    1. Re:I don't have a wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work for girls either, because the phone is in the purse, with the wallet.

  24. I'm more likely to lose my phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If my wallet would vibrate when it's away from my phone, that'd be just as good.

  25. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create an app that tracks the actual money once they leave your wallet instead.
      It would change people's world perspective once they see how their tax money gets used or all those paychecks to charity or those irritating hidden taxes on various services that grow crappier and more expensive at the same time ...

  26. 85 feet? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    if you walk 20-85 feet away from your wallet, the app will make a sound and guide you back to it.

    85 feet? So, far enough to be out of earshot thanks to walls and other obstructions, and even if you do hear it you might not make it back in time before someone else has been attracted to the sound and stolen your wallet.

    And if you're so forgetful that you need this, you're probably forgetful enough to leave your phone behind too.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:85 feet? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Read what you quoted a few more times until you realize it's YOUR PHONE that makes the noise, not the wallet.

      The wallet just has some shitty Bluetooth LE transponder and battery in it.

      This should probably be sold as an insert for any wallet rather than a full wallet, especially their shitty design.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:85 feet? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Read what you quoted a few more times until you realize it's YOUR PHONE that makes the noise, not the wallet.

      A few more times? I clearly didn't even read it once! Oops.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:85 feet? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      This should probably be sold as an insert for any wallet rather than a full wallet, especially their shitty design.

      This is another serious issue for me. It is really really hard to find a good wallet of the proper size and configuration. Everything I have seen sold at a Big Box store is completely unacceptable, and botique-type places also are severely lacking. I had to go to a traditional 'leather shop' in a classic 'tourist trap' historic town to find a suitable wallet at any price.

  27. Doesn't beg the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Begging the question' is a logical fallacy related to circular logic. "The bible is true because the bible says it's true," is begging the question.

  28. What good is this? by IllusionalForce · · Score: 1

    The Internet of Things just found my lost wallet. So did the NSA, which is why it's empty now.

    1. Re:What good is this? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The NSA doesn't want your cash. They have bigger fish to fry. Also, they are in league with other TLAs and can print up some twenties to slip in your wallet, with little effort.

  29. Eight slots or nine? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    I don't want to have to cancel my planetarium membership.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  30. No by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    The Internet of Things can kiss my ass. Every day, I come to appreciate the things that are not connected to the Internet more and more.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  31. Here's how I would implement it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    The product would be a RFID tag reader that attaches to your keychain, rather than being embedded in one personal item like Woolet, and stays connected to your smartphone with Bluetooth. The device would read passive RFID tags in its vicinity, the simple stick-on tags with a range of a few meters.

    In the accompanying app, you would build lists of items you need to have with you on a series of given named occasions. When you leave the house to do something important, you scroll to, say "See Mistress" and the app has the device tell you of some tagged item you placed on the list is not right near you. Of course, your keys, with the device itself, would be the first thing checked. The app would display messages for any item on the lt that you don't have with you. "Forgot condoms!" would be a reminder on the example list, for instance.

    1. Re:Here's how I would implement it by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

      Passive RFID doesnt have a range much bigger than a few inches.

      Also range is dependent on the size of the cooper ring (antenna) or the passive device and/or the active device (reader)

      Unless your keychain is 4 feet long... you aint going to be reading any passive devices around you. Also, orientation is important, so you might, with your 4 foot long key chain, find devices directly ahead, however, if they are a few inches to the left... they might as well not exist.

    2. Re: Here's how I would implement it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      You're probably thinking of NFC. Passive RFID tags have a range of 1-3m, which is perfect for determining whether items on one of my lists of must-have items is on the user's body:
      http://www.rfidjournal.com/faq...

    3. Re: Here's how I would implement it by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

      I'm not thinking of anything. I know exactly what I am talking about because I sell, design and install security systems all day long.

      NFC is a set of technologies for smartphones, that uses standard RFID frequencies.They can typicaly read 13.56Mhz RFID which is smartcard technology (Mifare, desFire, etc...) found in newer access cards and bank cards.

      RFID is a generic term. Specific technologies and frequencies are whats important.

      Regardless of any of this, read your link carefully, it doesn't say that you can read a tiny passive tag at 1-3m.

      - To read at more than a few inches you need something in a high frequency range. 433mhz to 2.4ghz.
      - Your tag needs to be relatively big (2-4 inches, like these stickers https://www.awid.com/index.php...)
      - It has to be positioned just right, wont be reading it sideways
      - The reader needs some good power and a good size (https://www.awid.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=537:lr-2000&catid=979:readers-lr-avi&Itemid=205)

      This can be increased if the RFID tag has a battery, then however it is no longer Passive, it is active. And thats a hole other ball game.

      Only reason RFID tags put on clothing in stores can read from several feet is because the readers (those large SENSORMATIC devices at the exits) have copper rings that are 2-5 feet high) which increases the read range of the tiny RFID chips with tiny cooper rings.

      Also, you wont be doing inventory with RFID chips that read up to 20-30 feet. That would be crazy expensive RFID chips on your cheap merchandise and also, you wouldnt be able to figure out where your inventory is, as you can read it from across the room. Doesn't make much sense.

      So... basically, my point was just, you cant have a tiny key chain as an RFID reader, read tiny chips, on tiny objects around you. Just wont work.... with currently technology.

      Unless you use tiny batteries :)

  32. Pain in the Butt by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    So when I'm home and leave the wallet in one place my phone is going to make an alarm when I move about the house as it gets out of range or am I going to have to carry my wallet around with me all of the time now too? Or is there an geographic area that it turns off? Because when I head up to bed and take my phone it's more than 20 feet away from my wallet which could trigger the alarm.

    1. Re:Pain in the Butt by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Not just at home. I never take my wallet when I go for a walk, and would quickly turn off an app that tried to alert me whenever I did.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  33. Great! Now all I need is ... by psalm33 · · Score: 1

    Now all I need is an app to find where I left my phone! ....has anyone seen it?

  34. What if.. by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    ...you lose your smartphone, eh?

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  35. Yay, I'm thrilled by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

    There's nothing I want more than an Internet-connected phone keeping a record of my location and sharing it with some random app publisher. Nothing could go wrong.

  36. Nervad's Lobster by spongman · · Score: 1

    > What would it take for a connected device, whether a wallet or a smoke detector, to gain mass appeal?

    A front-page ad on Slashdot, obviously.

  37. The same as the Nokia Treasure Tag by Hougaard · · Score: 1

    I have on my keys right now :)

  38. Great to track kids too? by boa · · Score: 1

    When my kids were younger, they tended to get lost at theme parks. I wish I had been able to get some kind of warning whenever they drifted too far away from me. So maybe this wallet solution can be adapted to other uses as well? Giving the wallet to the kids is not an option, :-)

  39. What, this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.microsoft.com/en/mobile/accessory/ws-2/

  40. And as free extra by hey! · · Score: 1

    empowers data mining companies to track and correlate your cash purchases with your credit card purchases.

    At least of I were CTO of a company developing something like this I'd be talking with one of those big consumer data aggregators that has everyone's data but almost nobody has ever heard of. Which is why I'd never work on something like this. I wouldn't want the conflict between public responsibility and duty to the shareholders.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  41. Re:rechargeable money, next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait: in our new everything-is-cloudy age, you will have to keep your money recharged or have it deflate to worthless within a day or two.

  42. I have the answer by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    What would it take for a connected device, whether a wallet or a smoke detector, to gain mass appeal?

    For it to only be connected to devices I own. I am sorry, but I just do not get the "Internet of things".

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  43. Tile by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    Does anybody remember Tile? I chipped in when they were doing their initial fundraising, but I never heard back from them. Anyway, it was pretty similar to this. But it would even work if your lost thing was far away, as long as enough people use the Tile app. The idea was to turn everybody's iPhone into a thing finder for lost stuff. Pretty ingenious, but it delves a little too far into the creepy realm for most people. "You want to use *my* phone to find *your* stuff?!"

  44. Rather than buy a whole wallet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why not just create a credit card-sized device that fits in *any* wallet? It would be be more useful and could be used with non-wallet objects.

  45. Already on the obsoletion list... by David_Hart · · Score: 1

    Mobile payments are here. It will take some time to become ubiquitous to the point where you no longer need a wallet, but it's coming. Digital IDs (i.e. digital drivers license) are the next step. Once we have these, wallets will no longer be as common. Why carry a wallet and a phone with you if you only need the phone?

    Sates working on Digital IDs:
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/...

    1. Re:Already on the obsoletion list... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Why carry a wallet and a phone with you if you only need the phone?

      On the other hand, why carry a phone when all you *need* is your wallet? And a wallet doesn't have potential battery or reception problems, etc... Seriously, a phone is not really a necessity.

      Also, mobile payments further intrude on one's privacy and can be more time consuming that cash or a CC - for example, yesterday it took one guy (and the clerk) 2 minutes to get the scanner to read the qrcode on his smartphone so he could pay for his lunch. I can see many potential problems with digital IDs as well.

      Yes, I realize that my usage and preferences are simply mine. And, sure, I have a cell phone (a Qualcomm QCP 1900 from 1998) but I only carry it when I travel and can't even remember the last time I turned on it.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  46. Uh huh. Now I *have* to carry my phone... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    if you walk 20-85 feet away from your wallet, the app will make a sound and guide you back to it.

    More specifically, if your wallet/keys and *phone* are separated by 20-85 feet. So now I have to carry my phone *everywhere* I take my wallet or keys? Like using my keys to get something from the car in the driveway or shed in the back yard - or running out to get some milk. There are numerous activities for which one wants to use keys or a wallet, but doesn't need their cell phone.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  47. Simpsons, er, I mean, tile did it first... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just a Tile?

    https://www.thetileapp.com/

    Before they go any further, they had better make sure that tile doesn't have any patents...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  48. one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now just have the wallet tell me where the hell I left my phone and we can talk.

    Seriously, shouldn't this be a credit card instead of a wallet. Normally I favor dedicated devices but this is a bit to far.

  49. "What would it take for a connected device..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a battery charge that lasts forever - or the device is useless once it's juice dies.