Slashdot Mirror
Australia May Introduce Site Blocking To Prevent Copyright Infringement
Bismillah writes: The conservative Coalition government in Australia is on the verge of introducing legislation requiring ISPs to block sites alleged of copyright infringement. Details of the bill have not yet been published, but it is expected to be sent to Parliament this week.
Stay tuned
Isn't that the entire point? They just help people find other people who are infringing copyright.
The first lawyer with a pair of balls is going to have a field day with this.
Film at eleven...
I was having breakfast at my local cafe w/ my partner last weekend, next to us a group of 4 normal aussies sit down at the table and after ordering start talking about this situation.
They clearly weren't in IT, not overly tech literate, and in fact like most typical aussies were pretty "anti-big-brother" by the sounds of it... However while discussing this topic of 3 strikes laws and nation-wide blocking of sites, etc - one of them brought up the concept of VPNs and how they could be used to work around all of this for $5-$10 a month, seemingly a tech literate friend must have told them about it - and now it's spreading to his friends via word of mouth.
A lot of people here are probably already using VPNs for work or to avoid surveillance, and some of you might think that this is the solution to the problem but "most people" won't know about VPNs or know how to set it up.
But the fact of the matter, where there's a will there's a way, and word of mouth is very effective at spreading information to all types of people from all walks of life - no matter how hard the government try, every day ordinary australians - be they house wives, kids, grandparents, or the tradie down the road - they're simply going to end up using a VPN to work around this.
Try as you might Abbott, you can't do shit. I suggest you put our money somewhere worth while, say, into science and education, this thing you don't believe in but manages to thwart everything you've been trying to shove down our throats all this time.
Say no more.
The Pirate Bay has an onion address, does kickass.to?
When will bit torrent clients support .onion addresses for trackers?
They've also tried this in Finland.
How effective is it? Two words: Mirror and Proxy. It literally has no effect on piracy. It's a waste of resources legislated in by people with no handle on the situation.
Purchased
How is that even possible? Don't the ones and zeros come out all sideways when the tubes flush the wrong way round?
G'day,
This is the kind of bollocks that the government has been talking about since day one. Mostly driven by the deplorable ACT Attourney General, George Brandis.
The first thing I should point out is that it's just talk. They're talking about introducing legislation to parliment. They haven't done anything but talk.
The second thing is, the Libs face a hostile senate. The Liberal party are our conservatives BTW. Whilst they can pass it in the lower house, it will fail in the upper house.
The third thing is, they will face a revolt from their back bench, many of whom are facing re-election in the next 18 months in an environment where the Liberal party is losing almost every election they're coming up against. So a lot of them are thinking of their own good over the parties.
Finally, ISP's are a powerful lobby over here and you can bet they dont want to turn customers to smaller ISP's who will skirt the laws.
So I'm not worried. the LNP (Liberal/National Party) haven't been able to do much of anything and what they have done has earned them a severe backlash.
Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
Unless they are incompetent enough to use DNS-based "blocking". That is a complete non-starter.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Netflix starts up in a few weeks in Australia.
Did they lobby the govt to create this law to "save" the 2 new jobs it will create in Australia, just so they can funnel their profits overseas like Google, Amazon, Microsoft etc?
Remember when Youtube removed one of NASA's landing videos because a News corporation claimed ownership? Our government wouldn't.
Our biggest issue is that these clowns were only voted in because they successfully argued (wrongly) that the Carbon Tax was costing everyone a lot of money. Turns out it isn't.. But while the rest of us see fibre with high-speed uploads as beneficial, these guys seem to think Netflix is all the internet will be used for.
Even worse, most of them clearly can barely use a computer. That's why they won't be affected by any takedown notices anyway (that, and it seems every law they make exempts government anyway)
Just goes to prove that the majority of voters in Australia are conservative. Do they complain as much as the Americans about their government? Because if they do, it only proves they're just as stupid... And remember, Murdoch is an Aussie. I'm very disappointed. I expected better from these people, and here they are, no different from the rest of us schlubs. And what's worse is that their beer isn't all that good either. Maybe that's the problem.
Again, this imbecile government bungles another one of their policies. They have no subtlety. If you want to implement an unpopular law, blame it on the terrorists.
Tell the people the laws are necessary to prevent The Children radicalizing. Then once you've created the regulating mechanism, increase it's scope outside Parliament. (preferably through carefully vague mandates). Salami slicing.
They've stuffed it in their collective haste to please Rupert Murdoch. It's a good thing our government is incompetent.
firstly, we are finally getting Netflix etc in Oz, although it won't be the same as in the USA. As for blocking sites, I guess that no-one is going to give up their VPN anytime soon.
There was an unknown error in the submission.
So if someone makes a complaint about corporate GPL violation - will the violating company's web site be blocked as well ? If so it could be useful. However I suspect that this law is aimed at protecting corporate profits and not controlling corporate robbers.
Subtle twisting of facts there, dear Submitter.
The Government at the same time said it would also amend the Copyright Act to enable rights holders to apply for a court order requiring ISPs to block access to non-Australian websites that had been PROVEN to provide access to infringing content.
The fact is, youtube is the biggest host for copyright infringed material and google search is the best way to find other sources for pirating. So unless they plan on blocking all Google services they can stick their legislation in their down under.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not advocating piracy or anything. I just find it funny how people who seamingly know nothing about how the internet works can be tasked with writing legislation for how to police it. What we need to do is make a public collection, so we as people can start throwing money at politicians, just like the big companies do. That way maybe we'll get something done that actually means a damn to humanity instead of big business.
Censorship doesn't even work in China, it doesn't work in the UK, and it will certainly not work in Australia who are used to being screwed over on internet related matters and are generally chatty.
VPN use in Australia is going up due to terrible region restriction bullshit. Now it will go up even more.
Soon they will probably end up trying to block VPN. And that is hopefully when business even stops by and tells them to get fucked.
...will have something to say about this.
How can you block the world's; nay, the universe's largest search engine!
CAPTCHA = 'unjust'
No, they aren't a tyranny. They will never have to worry about that because all the guns are in the hands of government.
It's amazing there are people that think that blocking websites makes any sustainable difference.
So, I guess Bont Skates won't be having a web site anymore then.
A bloke down the pub told me this site (liberal.org.au) was hosting infringing content
That's an allegation, lets get it blocked now shall we?