Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Adds Tool To Report Tweets To the Police

itwbennett writes Twitter is ramping up its efforts to combat harassment with a tool to help users report abusive content to law enforcement. The reports would include the flagged tweet and its URL, the time at which it was sent, the user name and account URL of the person who posted it, as well as a link to Twitter's guidelines on how authorities can request non-public user account information from Twitter. It is left up to the user to forward the report to law enforcement and left up to law enforcement to request the user information from Twitter.

79 comments

  1. OMG that slut totally insulted me! by NotDrWho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Click report to police.

    Bitch!

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:OMG that slut totally insulted me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine that goes a little like this.

      They deserved that, lol.

    2. Re:OMG that slut totally insulted me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the good ol snitch switch.

    3. Re:OMG that slut totally insulted me! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      Click report to police.

      As described in TFA: The user can only opt to also receive an email containing information about the reported tweet.
      It's up to that user to forward the email to the police.

      From TFS: (for those with even shorter attention spans):

      It is left up to the user to forward the report to law enforcement ...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:OMG that slut totally insulted me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, a snitch switch. Just like what they used to have under Stazi -- free forms that YOU, THE CONCERNED CITIZEN had to fill out.

    5. Re:OMG that slut totally insulted me! by MrLint · · Score: 1

      Considering that in the instances of 'high profile' individuals, for whom their treats actually got police attention, and when then deemed 'non credible'; there is going to be a vanishingly small percentage of times in which any action is taken by law enforcement for which the reporter will be satisfied.

      What is actually a problem condition is that there is a low SNR and something actually happens to someone, and then police hyper react.

      We can only hope that well-trained (larger?) law enforcement agencies know how to sift thru all the chaff, but some small town PD? No way to know what you are going to get there.

    6. Re:OMG that slut totally insulted me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PSA: Do not click. Lemonparty or some such on the other end of that link.

  2. *eye roll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SJWs are ruining the Internet. Can we either kick them off or just start a new one?

    1. Re:*eye roll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MRA troll

    2. Re:*eye roll* by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They're ruining the world. Fuck them all. The world should be offensive and rude and nasty.

    3. Re:*eye roll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look, a redditeur

    4. Re:*eye roll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I support a bunch of pricks wih tiny dicks?

    5. Re:*eye roll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL no. MRAs are even dumber than the SJWs. A bunch of priviledged white guys whining about being oppressed is hilarious stupidity.

    6. Re: *eye roll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice display of racial prejudice!

    7. Re: *eye roll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I hate many of my fellow whites.

    8. Re:*eye roll* by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I didn't know what SJW meant so I found this urbandictionary definition to be helpful:

      SJW
      Social Justice Warrior. A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A social justice warrior, or SJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the groups they are fighting on behalf of. They typically repeat points from whoever is the most popular blogger or commenter of the moment, hoping that they will "get SJ points" and become popular in return. They are very sure to adopt stances that are "correct" in their social circle.

      The SJW's favorite activity of all is to dogpile. Their favorite websites to frequent are Livejournal and Tumblr. They do not have relevant favorite real-world places, because SJWs are primarily civil rights activists only online.
      #1:

      A social justice warrior reads an essay about a form of internal misogyny where women and girls insult stereotypical feminine activities and characteristics in order to boost themselves over other women.

      The SJW absorbs this and later complains in response to a Huffington Post article about a 10-year-old feminist's letter, because the 10-year-old called the color pink "prissy".

      #2:

      Commnter: "I don't like getting manicures. It's too prissy."

      SJW: "Oh my god, how fucking dare you use that word, you disgusting sexist piece of shit!"

    9. Re: *eye roll* by aevan · · Score: 1

      You act like it's impossible to hate your own ethnicity. Racist is racist, regardless of punching up, down, left, right, or yourself in the crotch.

      Anyway, contrary to the Republic of Mah Feelz, butthurt isn't legal grounds (for any value of 'Not Sweden'), so unless it's an actual death threat, this is pointless pandering.

      Well, no, Airstrip One has fun views of terrorism, so people tweeting about a party being a blast might get swept up too.

    10. Re: *eye roll* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't say I wasn't racist against white people. I admitted to it.

    11. Re:*eye roll* by allo · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing about feminists: They support every disadvantage. "Hey, you can't say 'i heard that ...', because deaf people cannot her. Ableism!". But as soon as they need to cope with critizism, they use disadvantages as insult "He's got a small dick". Not only it's an insult, assuming stuff they know its propably untrue, but its even something which would be some of their many *isms.

  3. lolz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh this wont be abused at all

  4. Will only be used by those who are being accused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people who should be using this function have never learned about glass houses and throwing stones. Soon reporting posts to the police will be a form of harassment.

  5. THE TOOL DOESNT REPORT TO POLICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are all idiots.

    1. Re:THE TOOL DOESNT REPORT TO POLICE by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's just a list of flagged tweets, hopefully this will satiate idiots that report personal insults because there's no way law enforcement has time for this bullshit.

    2. Re:THE TOOL DOESNT REPORT TO POLICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's just a list of flagged tweets, hopefully this will satiate idiots that report personal insults because there's no way law enforcement has time for this bullshit.

      Yes, but they obviously have plenty of time to arrest people for possession of a fucking plant.

      #Priorities

  6. Now to make stupidity a crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then the police will be overwhelmed with enforcement, and unable to foil my plot to rob all the world's banks.

  7. Alarmists quick with the trigger finger by HalAtWork · · Score: 0

    This is ridiculous, they'll get flooded with requests, unable to handle them all. Every idiot that's willing to call 911 because the PlayStation Network is down is going to have a field day with this. Is there any accountability for those who use the tool?

    1. Re:Alarmists quick with the trigger finger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Filing false police reports is illegal

    2. Re:Alarmists quick with the trigger finger by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      So are a lot of things the police are too busy to even show up for. Unless there is a dead body, or some politically correct class is involved, don't even bother calling, as nothing will ever happen.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Alarmists quick with the trigger finger by rnturn · · Score: 1

      ``Is there any accountability for those who use the tool?''

      Sure. About as much accountability as there is for the people who create applications that allow morons to send unmoderated messages that others wind up finding objectionable, insulting, harrassing, etc. (IANAL but, IMHO, it doesn't much matter that posts can be deleted. Once sent the damage to the target has been done.) At least Twitter posts are identified and can be traced to an individual. Unlike Yik Yak where one can be harrassed anonymously by its users and there's no recourse for those who've been targeted. Wait until its creators wind up on the receiving end of a class-action lawsuit for that and its investors pull out after wondering why they ever gave money to people who don't appear to have given any thought to how their nifty software might be (mis)used. Due diligence? They've heard of it. Maybe. But my money's on ``no''.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    4. Re:Alarmists quick with the trigger finger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Law enforcement already trawl through tweets so this just narrows the funnel for them.

    5. Re:Alarmists quick with the trigger finger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, first of all the feature doesn't notify the police for you, it only emails you the information in a form you can conveniently forward (or print and mail/file in person) to the police.

      So laziness will keep most of it in line.

      Failing that the police aren't actually required to act on every report they get, and filing false or excessive reports is a crime, so it is unlikely to be an actual problem.

  8. Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is just Twitter covering their ass by providing a way for a user to furnish a "report" to the police that isn't some shitty picture they took on their phone.

    But what can police do? Say you live in Bumfuck Nowhere, USA and you bring this report to your local Sheriff saying InternetUser1234 in SomewhereFarAway, USA is accosting me online. Then what? They get out the bloodhounds to "trace the IP"?

    Most PDs don't have units or personnel equipped or trained to utilize these reports.

    Why doesn't twitter just provide a button that a user can push when they feel relentlessly accosted by internet trolls. It would delete the user's account.

    1. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by rnturn · · Score: 1

      ``Why doesn't twitter just provide a button that a user can push when they feel relentlessly accosted by internet trolls. It would delete the user's account.''

      Instead of an account being deleted due to the tweet recipient pushing a button, I'd vote for having that button send a message to a dedicated team at Twitter who would decide whether a user account should be terminated. Allowing `end users' to cause accounts to be deleted could be -- and almost certainly would be -- badly abused.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Chalnoth · · Score: 2

      I think EMG intended this to mean that the person being harassed could delete their own account if they get tired of the trolls. Because apparently people who are on the receiving end of relentless campaigns of harassment including rape and death threats should be punished for being on the receiving end of such relentless campaigns.

    3. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the parent was suggesting that clicking the button would delete YOUR account. It is, after all, the only surefire way to stop incoming harrassment.

    4. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure it counts as abuse.

      the gaol of the feature is to prevent harassment in Twitter, and the ability for any one recipient to delete your account would make maintaining a twitter account pretty much impossible thereby making you unable to be targeted for harassment on Twitter.

      It is a bit like curing the disease by incinerating the patient, but strictly speaking if I build a flamethrower and claim it destroys cancer cells, I'm not technically wrong.

    5. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by sexconker · · Score: 2

      Woosh. The button would delete the account of the person clicking it.
      The only thing you need to do in response to trolls is ignore them.

      If you're getting a lot of shit from a lot of "trolls" you may want to stop and think about what you're doing that makes you such a big fat target - odds are you're the troll.

    6. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by rockout · · Score: 0

      Wow, you've taken "blame the victim" to a whole new level. Bravo.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    7. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can't be a bad thing. The first step in dealing with this sort of thing is credible, authentic documentation.

    8. Re: Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG wut about teh victims!!!1!11!!?1

    9. Re: Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ridiculous comment of the day award goes to you. Hands down. Winner.

    10. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Too easily abused by popularity.

      I tweet "Justin Bieber's unphotoshopped pics leaked. Does his crotch bulge look smaller? #Bieber #Photosock." Half an hour later the tweet gets picked up and retweeted in anger by some popular fan. Half an hour after that, fifteen thousand angry beliebers flood Twitter with complaints about inappropriate content and my account gets taken down.

      It's already an issue on youtube for political and religious videos: People making them quite often have to create new accounts after a rival faction pounces on some slim excuse to mass-flag a video.

    11. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously. I mean, like, just stop being raped and murdered and be a normal person. If you can't do that then get off Twitter.

    12. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The recent publishing of 4chan IRC chat logs show the trolls discussing the use of these disposable sock puppet accounts extensively.It's how they made GamerGate seem like a huge deal when it actually a very small group.

      The most recent story of 4chan IRC logs I found was almost half a year ago. Meanwhile, GamerGate is still around to this day, long after the mainstream media (who is more responsible for making GamerGate a big deal, giving the trolls the attention they wanted) had their fun with it.

      Some people argue that Sarkeesian is a troll

      Many more people argue that GamerGate is just a movement manufactured by a small number of trolls, such as what you just did. Alas, when one tries to defend against that, "listen and believe" quickly becomes "attack and destroy" and "hear and ignore" if a woman, a woman who has been writing about gaming long before Anita came along mind you, didn't agree with the narrative pushed by Anita and the anti-GGers

      If you listen to hear videos she has carefully constructed, detailed arguments.

      And if you listened to others, they have constructed detailed rebuttals and criticisms.

      You might not like them, but simply disagreeing does not make someone a troll.

      Indeed, people should listen to GamerGate instead of casting them all as harassers and trolls.

    13. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "blame the victim" was taken to a whole new level a long, long time ago, when people started flinging it around at the drop of a hat, instead of just when someone is perpetuating just world fallacy. Anyone remember that submission here, where a cloud service provider dropped the ball on security and leaked customers' private data? Anyone remember how many people were accused of 'blaming the victim' after they pointed out how the company fucked up?

    14. Re:Twitter Anti-Cyberbully CYA Technique #43 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You might not like them, but simply disagreeing does not make someone a troll.

      It's a shame the other side isn't afforded the same luxury.

      Sending death and rape threats from sock puppet accounts makes them a troll.

      No, apparently, just disagreeing makes you a troll, a harasser, a misogynist, etc. No matter how well-reasoned and civil your argument is.

  9. Re:Great for the SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you hyping this game made by a pedophile?

  10. What are the odds? by Iamthecheese · · Score: 0

    An internet bully's power is the attention he is given. Ignore her and he'll go away unsatisfied. I want to believe this can be a force for good; that only real, credible threats that deserve the attention of the police will be reported. But I know that won't be the case. Either this will generate so many reports that it will be utterly ignored or, much worse, there will be political pressure to respond inappropriately to tweets that should be ignored.

    Anyone seriously intent on harassing someone using Twitter will spend the tens of dollars for an account or, more likely, make a zero day egg account from a throw-away email address. It costs surprisingly little to buy a fake Twitter account. In fact I would wager this whole exercise is a cynical attempt to get Twitter into the news again. So bravo, Slashdot. As for reporting functionality there just isn't the manpower, on twitter or on government payrolls, to filter from the mass of hurt feelings the few actually actionable reports. The most this can accomplish is a slight chance to catch the very stupidest/youngest harassers and/or build a case against them after they're caught by other means.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:What are the odds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Need I remind anyone that "Swatters" exist and that "Swatting" is a thing?

      Assuming that this won't be abused...? Yeah, probably not a good starting assumption there.

    2. Re:What are the odds? by allo · · Score: 1

      OTOH, swating means, you tell the police something untrue. This function means, you tell the police where to look, IF it is a problem.

  11. But to WHICH police? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    This seems rather hopeless. Does it go to the police with jurisdiction closest to the IP address the offending tweet came from? Or to the police closest to where the alleged victim resides? What if the intended police department has no cyber-crimes unit?

    And what do you do to prevent people from trolling this system? It seems that someone could really waste a lot of time and resources at large police departments by flagging every tweet with their names or abbreviations in it.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:But to WHICH police? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      This seems rather hopeless. Does it go to the police with jurisdiction closest to the IP address the offending tweet came from? Or to the police closest to where the alleged victim resides?

      From TFS: " It is left up to the user to forward the report to law enforcement ..."

      The user can only opt to *also* receive an email containing information about the reported tweet.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  12. Yup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't see this going horribly wrong at all.

  13. Re:Great for the SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    mikeeusa is not anti-SJW, he is anti-women to the same extent that SJWs are anti-white and anti-men.

    That said, there is a question of whether his personal views should have been an issue in discussing the release of a game. Code is neutral.

  14. Wtf? Where?! by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Informative

    From article.

    > Women have been ruthlessly targeted on Twitter and on other sites like Reddit and 4chan, due to sexism in the video game industry, sometimes referred to as “Gamergate.”

    This makes no freaking sense, How the the hell is the video game industry, reddit and gamergate followers ruthless attacking women on twitter?

    Other than the 3 women who are anti-gamergate, where are the actual victims? Where are this masses of criminals doing this? I keep reading about it, all these evil people doing it, but nobody is ever arrested... Smells like propeganda for some special interests, like some group looking for funding for their businesses... Look war on women going on over here! But please dont investigate, just take our word.

    So, this Zack Miners who wrote the story for IDG, the same IDG that pushes the war on women narative on all its publications without backing up it up with any facts. IDG Tech news = gossip, rumors and attack on evil gamers attacking women. Sheesh.

    1. Re:Wtf? Where?! by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Well, you need an actual harassment to press the police button in first place.

    2. Re:Wtf? Where?! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      There is an on-going FBI investigation, but it takes time. There is a lot of evidence to go through. For example, after Quinn posted IRC logs showing the GamerGaters organizing their trolling and talking openly about it, GG published the full IRC logs: http://puu.sh/boAEC/f072f259b6... (warning: very large text file)

      It's going to take a long, long time to go through those logs, build up profiles of those users and gather together the relevant sections where they post incriminating material, then tie that up with Twitter accounts. Victims will need to be identified (many of the sock puppet accounts used stolen profile pictures from social media), both to include them in the charges and to make sure it wasn't them posting. Information will need to be requested from Twitter, and then ISPs, and then local cops will probably be involved in the actual arrests.

      The good news is that GamerGate seems to have mostly shut up and the amount of trolling has decreased since those logs were published. Maybe some of the trolls are already in custody, maybe they are just laying low and hoping they don't get caught.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Wtf? Where?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even have to read any further than the word "4chan". If someone cites 4chan as an abusive community, they have no clue what 4chan is, and the credibility of their argument is lost.

      It's like saying "Racial tensions are at an all time high, as we can see from this footage of a KKK chapter meeting in Middle of Nowhere, Alabama, racism is still raging in the USA...."

      That is to say...what they're trying to say *could* be true, but they're using the wrong evidence to prove their point. I expect the KKK to be racist. I expect 4chan to be an abusive cesspool, especially /b/ where most of the quotes come from.

  15. So would using this tool by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    change a tweet into an oink?

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  16. Re:Great for the SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does it matter who made a game? Can't you judge the game by its own merits? Of course you can't. Moron.

  17. Re:Great for the SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just keep supporting that pedophile.

  18. That won't be abused! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh boy, this totally won't be abused to high hell and back.

    This tool will get abused so hard it will become worthless.

    Great one Twitter.

    I bet it isn't even CAPTCHA'd.

  19. Re:Great for the SJWs. by sexconker · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with supporting a video game created by a pedophile / jew / pro-skub / nigger / fag / Stalin / congressman / horse ?
    I expect an answer.

  20. They Don't Have Evidence by Kunedog · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's an interesting vid:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... That is direct video evidence of an anti-GG Sarkeesian supporter threatening physical violence against a pro-GG guy. Everyone knows that if the other side had evidence one tenth as damning, we would never hear the end of it, ever, across dozens (probably hundreds) of sites.

    So it's the same old song for Slashdot's abysmal Gamergate coverage:

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    Try this: link to the /. article that covers the Gamergate scandal without screaming about misogyny and harassment. You can't. And that's because overall, the Slashdot readership doesn't buy the "misogyny and harassment" narrative for one second. The editors quickly discovered that the discussion thread for any article that straightforwardly mentions Gamergate--even if it's one-sided [slashdot.org]--couldn't be trusted to go the way the editors demand.

    For a while, they found limited success by posting articles with the template "misogyny, harassment, threats, misogyny, harassment, threats . . . oh btw Gamergate" (i.e. a br But even that's not working anymore, and the editors' credibility on this issue is shot. Permanently.

    Slashdot wants desperately to cover Gamergate, but doesn't want to be honest and up front that it's doing so, and especially that it's taking the pro-corruption side. In the early weeks, they even tried to participate in the blackout, which led to almost every article about gaming at all becoming a Gamergate thread. The editors/ownership knew damn well what they were doing, and it's silly to blame anyone else for the consequences of refusing to cover Gamergate, except with propaganda.

    This is one of those articles that follows that tired template. Make no mistake, it's about Gamergate and the editors damn well know it; they're just too scared to say so.

    1. Re:They Don't Have Evidence by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Bum 1: The journalists are running scared...
      Bum 2: The people know they are corrupt.

      Courtesy of Deus Ex.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:They Don't Have Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a shame.

  21. So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 chars

  22. Re:Great for the SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a fuck who made the game? Plenty of people still use reiserfs, that doesn't mean they're pro-murder.

  23. Learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Americans have learned to emulate Nazi Germany. Everyone wants to be a member of the Stasi.

    1. Re:Learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Stasi belonged to the GDR (East Germany) and came about after the end of WWII... i.e., not Nazi's. Idiot.

  24. Re:Great for the SJWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take offense to your classifying me on the same level as a Congressman!

  25. Re:Great for the SJWs. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    The person who owns the site has full editorial control. Start your own site to talk about Mikee if it's such a big deal.

  26. Re:Great for the SJWs. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    The educational establishment had a similar debate a few years back over a website called Sparklebox - a free resource site for primary school teachers. Posters, worksheets, that sort of thing. Very popular - teachers love resources as they save a lot of time. Until it emerged that the site's founder had been convicted for possession of child abuse imagery. There was a strong backlash - many teachers refused to use the site after that, posters were taken down from walls, and some local authorities even blocked the site on their webfilters. There was never any reason to believe the site posed or could possibly pose even the slightest danger to children - it wasn't for children to view, it was only for teachers - but this didn't do much to lessen the backlash: The site was owned by a dirty pedo, therefore all resources from the site were considered tainted and unfit for viewing by delicate children.

    Detail: https://www.tes.co.uk/article....

  27. Re:Great for the SJWs. by allo · · Score: 1

    what does it matter?
    1) pedophile is no crime, its a sexual preference and maybe an mental illness
    2) If somebody acts illegal, it's the job of the police to act on it. If it's illegal, they will do something, if he did nothing wrong, there is nothing to do. So you do not need to care about supporting or not, it's just not your thing to judge.

  28. Re:Great for the SJWs. by allo · · Score: 1

    pro murdering files. Ever ran fsck.reiserfs?