Taxi Apps Accused of Facilitating Sexual Harassment In Brazil
New submitter André Costa writes The companies responsible for taxi apps Easy Taxi and 99Taxis are being accused of making it too easy for taxi drivers to harass female customers (some news reports — in Portuguese — can be found here, here and here). These apps currently disclose informations such as the client's name, cell phone and address to the driver. One customer that started being harassed through offensive text messages after a ride started an online petition demanding that the companies take effective measures to protect female customers. The petition already collected more than 27,000 signatures, and both Easy Taxi and 99Taxis already announced that they will implement features that will protect clients' privacy. At first, users will be allowed to choose if they want their phone numbers to be disclosed. Within a couple of months, both companies said they will provide VOIP calls, which will eliminate the need to exchange phone numbers.
Here we go...
Uber is the only safe choice, really. I've got dozens of friends with horror stories about old fashioned Taxi drivers that attacked them or stole their phones or spat in their faces and one who was raped at gunpoint. I can't even say how many times I struggled to understand what that Taxi driver was even saying. LEARN ENGLISH, DUDE!
For me, Uber is the best choice because only Uber guarantees my safety and the low prices and easy availability are just bonuses!
Client sexually abuse you!
The driver calls a company number, which connects him to the customer he needs to reach. The driver never needs to know the customer phone number. To prevent harassment, the call transfer no longer works a few hours after the trip.
They have an uber problem on their hands. She should have a right to be lyft alone.
I'm fucking tired of this shit. Dudes deal with seedy bullshit all the time but the ladies want to be in little isolated soap bubbles.
Just enough. Another idea might be requiring that women passengers use female taxi drivers. Will that mean paying significantly more for a taxi? I can't control the market value. Maybe it will be an empowering experience and the female drivers will get a good financial opportunity. Who knows.
But really, this whole ongoing whine has become tiresome. If you want to use a normal yellow cab, then use one of those. If you want to use the the rape mobiles which is apparently character assassination being tried against Uber etc... then you know what you were getting in for.
Seriously done with it. No woman HAS to use an Uber cab. They can use a yellow cab or whatever was there before Uber. Use that, climb into the back of some grimy cab that smells like stale cigarette smoke driven in all likelihood by some hairy guy that is OF COURSE never going to rape you or make inappropriate comments. He isn't working for Uber, so he's safe.
And then enjoy your rape free environment. But if you use the Uber cab... I don't want to hear about it. I'm tapped out of care.
I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
Just yesterday /. was telling me how awesome taxi drivers are vetted against uber drivers despite all signs pointing the other way:
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7127477&cid=49296375
Color me surprised.
Taxi apps are a method of communications. ALL methods of communication can be used for bad things as easy as they can be used for good things. Blaming a "taxi" application is idiotic, because the same claim could be made of Facebook, Twitter, email, cell phones, or even a goddamn piece of paper and pen if that is the only method of communication handy.
People collude and plot. This is not some brand new revelation, it goes back thousands of years in historical writing. Read Homer, Plato, Aristotle, all of the diaries from the dark ages. More recently, watch just about any reality TV show which is always full of people plotting and scheming. Someone is always a victim, and someone always benefits. Losing your life savings on paper may be deemed "not as bad" as an assault, but the long reaching impact is worse in my opinion.
We can't teach history, and we can't talk about reality. We half to talk about invented dramas which have no bearing on reality except to maintain the status quo.
It's really too bad that people refuse to look at why people get paid big bucks to argue and publish these positions. Remember, Gamergate was an issue about sexism, not about corrupt journalists colluding to influence public opinion. (hint: One of those things is reality, the other is an invented scenario)
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
Back in the old days before "wimyns studies 101" and the rise of the victim complex.
Maybe these chicks need to put on their big girl panties and suck it, like their mothers before them.
Yeah this type of things are prevailing in all types of areas...............
Comment from http://Techstext.com
This story about sexual harrasment using phone apps brings up another question relevant to linux and FLOSS: Should sexist opensource developers have their projects censored or removed?
Recently an opensource game release story was removed due to the game developer's open sexism(0) and harrasment(1) of women in tech.
A story posted by the editor of the popular Phoronix linux news site about a release of an Open Source videogame was later manually removed(2). The reason cited was the game developer's unacceptable views on social issues such as gender equality (3).
The release story was titled "Xonotic-Forked ChaosEsqueAnthology Sees New Release - Phoronix" and can be accessed via the google cache(4).
With the recent inclusion of a code of conduct(5) for those wishing to contribute to the Linux Kernel some questions now need to be asked and answered about the inclusion of code from people who are known to engage in or promote socially unacceptable attitudes or harrasments of those whom the free-software movement would prefer to attract in their place:
* Are the social or political views of an author of free software relevant to that software's inherent quality?
* Should the beliefs of an opensource developer weigh when when evaluating whether a piece of opensource software is worthy of any publicity or public notice?
* Should men with unpopular or "forbidden" views be excised from the opensource movement and "not allowed" to contribute, in a manner similar to that which is done in employment?
* Has the free/opensource software movement changed in these respects since its founding? If so is this a positive change?
* Should there be gatekeepers to opensource that decide who may and who may not contribute. Should abusive developers be "blackballed" to maintain proper social order and controls?
and
* What are the consequences of not doing this
Citations:
(0) Past related incident: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1310
(1) http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/...
(2) Removed story URL: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.p...
(3) http://www.phoronix.com/forums...
"Fortunately, the article has been removed now."
"Thanks everybody for speaking up."
(4) https://webcache.googleusercon...
(5) Linux "Code of Conflict"
Absolutely yes, they should; along with anti-semetic and racist devs.
Why should you have the right to do this?
In the past, before the women moved in, all that mattered was the code.
Honestly, I think people like you, who can't leave men alone to their hobbies, will have to be killed to stop you.
You never let up. Thus killing is the only response.
Uber is responsible to global warming and the heartbreak of psoriasis in 3...2...1.
Sending an image is communicating. Sending a specific type of image is using that method of communication. Without failed logic can you prove my statement wrong regarding communication? Call me a skeptic, but you already failed at basic logic so I believe the answer is "NO".
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.