Slashdot Mirror


Debian GNU/Hurd 2015 Released

An anonymous reader sends this announcement from the debian-hurd mailing list: It is with huge pleasure that the Debian GNU/Hurd team announces the release of Debian GNU/Hurd 2015. This is a snapshot of Debian "sid" at the time of the stable Debian "jessie" release (April 2015), so it is mostly based on the same sources. It is not an official Debian release, but it is an official Debian GNU/Hurd port release. The installation ISO images can be downloaded from Debian Ports in the usual three Debian flavors: NETINST, CD, or DVD. Besides the friendly Debian installer, a pre-installed disk image is also available there, making it even easier to try Debian GNU/Hurd. The easiest way to run it is inside a VM such as qemu.

52 comments

  1. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it 3 1.7 GB ISOs on 3 DVDs instead of 2 DVDs?

    in fact, why is it 5.2 GB?

    1. Re:Huh by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      That's good question. Looks like they were too lazy to optimize it for the ~4.5 GB DVD / layer ...

      [ ] debian-hurd-2015-i386-DVD-1.iso 24-Apr-2015 07:24 1.7G
      [ ] debian-hurd-2015-i386-DVD-2.iso 24-Apr-2015 07:28 1.7G
      [ ] debian-hurd-2015-i386-DVD-3.iso 24-Apr-2015 07:32 1.8G

      The "typical" excuse would be to help with downloads but seriously who is using a downloader that can't resume in this day and age?

      Since the total is 5.2GB I wonder if they could re-compress the files down to 4.5 GB to fit on one DVD with say something like LZMA

    2. Re: Huh by debexpert1 · · Score: 1

      Ufff 5 gigs really? Wtf xD

    3. Re:Huh by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      When putting an iso's contents on a small USB drive (while keeping the fat32 filesystem and the rest of the files!) the less place it's taking, the better ; with debian you also typically only need DVD-1.
      If you do need off-line packages in DVD-2 and DVD-3, you can have the iso files stored anywhere and mount them anyway?

      DVD-R are somewhat unreliable so you're less likely to fail with a smaller iso, that would be another excuse.

    4. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are people releasing distros on DVDs in the first place? Have they not heard of USB flash drives??

    5. Re:Huh by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      That's a good point about USB. The FAT32 4GB file size limit is probably the technical reason why the files are spilt into 3 archives.

    6. Re: Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just minimal. Later install only what you want.

  2. And Yes, Kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It does run Duke Nukem Forever!

    1. Re:And Yes, Kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oculus Rift is also fully supported.

  3. My distro is better by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    All other distros suck balls.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  4. init changed by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 3, Informative

    The announcement:

    "the init system has been switched to sysvinit for a more Debian-like experience"

    The current Debian init experience (according to Slashdot comments):

    "Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light."

    1. Re:init changed by byuu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thankfully, Poettering is staunchly anti-portability, so systemd can't run on *BSD or Hurd. I consider that the only positive feature of systemd.

    2. Re:init changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Agreed totally, systemd is the death of free software :) Yes free software, not open source software. And it is dirven by a company, you all know which, to create a vendor lock-in situation, like M$ and Apple. Lendows (tm) is really going to kill development of free software, and nobody reacts, not even FSF :(

    3. Re:init changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's because Stallman and the FSF don't see systemd as the death of free software. To Stallman, systemd is GPLv3 and therefore, it is free software. If you want software that doesn't require systemd, then it's your responsibility to write software that doesn't use systemd. This is what GNU does.

  5. This is May, not April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I missing something? Did /. delay April fools?

  6. Oh, yeah? by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    MY distro is emacs on systemd.

    1. Re:Oh, yeah? by vux984 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've got it upside dowm. I run systemd on emacs.

    2. Re:Oh, yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      How you thay that! Heaventh, what will the neighborth think!

      For history's sake, I studied LISP with Jay Sussman. Hated it then, hate it now, and I'm appalled at how much of its horrific approach to unnecessary recursion and deliberately ignoring the other layers of the stack made it into Java.

    3. Re:Oh, yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My distro IS systemd.

      Everything else is redundant.

    4. Re:Oh, yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you use for an editor?

    5. Re:Oh, yeah? by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

      M-x editctl

    6. Re:Oh, yeah? by Polo · · Score: 1

      why not both?

  7. I love Debian by rogerbly · · Score: 1

    After being away working on CentOS and Archlinx for Asterisk radio station links, I'm back on Debian... home sweet home.

    1. Re:I love Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What problems did you run into with the other OSes? I'm curious as I haven't experienced many problems with any of the OSes you mentioned...but Fedora...that bane of my existence.

    2. Re:I love Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running fedora. haven't had issues with it. Anything specific that annoys you?

  8. systemd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I'd imagine no since it's not a Linux kernel. Would that mean this is the last release we'll see of Debian GNU/Herd since the next release of Debian will be full of systemd-dependencies?

    1. Re:systemd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      systemd will be ported to the Hurd around 3015

    2. Re:systemd? by armanox · · Score: 1

      If that were the case then Debian GNU/kFreeBSD would be done too.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    3. Re:systemd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well damn: http://www.itwire.com/business-it-news/open-source/66034-systemd-again?-debian-drops-kfreebsd-as-official-architecture

      In a post to the release team, Debian developer Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: "We discussed kfreebsd at length, but are not satisfied that a release with Jessie will be of sufficient quality. We are dropping it as an official release architecture, though we do hope that the porters will be able to make a simultaneous unofficial release."

      One of the reasons for this decision - though unstated by Wiltshire - could be systemd, the new init system that will be the default for the Jessie release. It cannot be used with any kernel other than Linux.

    4. Re:systemd? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      That last part is a bunch of bull shit.

      You can run Debian without systemd with the Linux kernel just fine.

      So kFreeBSD and Hurd can run without systemd just fine too.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    5. Re:systemd? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Well in fairness some modern operating system components that ship with Debian, such as recent GNOMEs, are transitioning (or have transitioned) to having systemd as a dependency. Yeah, you can "just not use GNOME", but over time more and more of the operating system will transition that way.

      And it kinda ignores why systemd exists. Over time, I'd expect Debian to make itself more systemd dependent, as doing so allows Debian to introduce long awaited security and stability improvements by allowing it to transparently use cgroups and run unprivileged daemons that can listen to privileged ports, things that are not practical under sysvinit (though might be under Upstart.)

      What I'd like to see is Hurd to introduce the functionality that systemd is reliant upon so it too can be ported.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:systemd? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Yes, seems desktop environments on Debian have some dependencies on systemd.

      Anyway, kFreeBSD on the server should be fine.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  9. Could this be.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .. the year of the HURD desktop?

    1. Re:Could this be.. by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      I think they announced that back in 1977 as part of the celebrations for the 20th anniversary of the start of the HURD project.

    2. Re:Could this be.. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      .. the year of the HURD desktop?

      Nah. More like 2060.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  10. i had to check... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the weather in michigan...

  11. April Fools was a month ago! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soooo late.

  12. still only 32-bit by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    GNU HURD still only runs in 32-bit mode. while you can run it on a 64-bit processor, you lose all the cool tricks you can do on 64-bit processors, especially when it comes to virtual machines.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:still only 32-bit by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've always felt that using 64 whole bits has been a waste of good address space. I'm glad HURD agrees. I'm actually contributing a patch to get them back down to 16-bit mode with the holy grail of finally returning to 8-bit. I have always felt that if you're running on a microkernel you should run with a micro address space too.

    2. Re:still only 32-bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Vmish capabilities, Hurd apparently uses 'Sub Hurds'.

      And it runs:
      "Notable new or upgraded packages which required considerable porting
      effort and/or are known to work well on Debian GNU/Hurd include
      Iceweasel 31 ESR, XFCE4 4.10, X.org 7.7 and Emacs 24.4."

      Dunno how more OSes are a bad thing. Dunnet on Hurd anyone?

  13. Got to ask by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    does it run systemd

    1. Re:Got to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid question. of couse not, why should it? Neither does kFreeBSD!

    2. Re:Got to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better question is: does systemd run it?

    3. Re:Got to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not, so perhaps I should replace my Debian GNU/systemd with it.

  14. Debian rejects game due to authors opinion on wome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Debian rejects game due to authors opinion on women.

    A properly licensed opensource casino video game was
    recently posted to the debian bug tracker as a request
    for packaging, as is the standard method for pursuing
    such things in debian.

    The bug was quickly closed, tagged as "won't fix"
    The reason given by one of the debian developers
    alluded to the authors past anti-feminist remarks:

    https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi...

    The piece of software in question is licensed
    under the GPL and is one of the only of it's
    kind for linux (ascii-art console slot machine software)

    Is professing progressive politics now a hard requirement
    for being allowed to contribute to free software projects?

    Debian developers also threatened author with lengthy imprisonment, denied existence of author's contributions

    Previously a debian developer, Erich Schubert, claimed that the author of gpcslots had never
    contributed anything to opensource, was corrected, replyed to the corrections,
    and then deleted the corrections and left up his false claims.
    Author has contributed gigabytes of media to opensource, years of programming
    work, and has been involved in numerous projects.
    http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/2...

    Another debian developer, Josselin Mouette, (while bragging that he, JM, had successfuly
    campaigned to ban prostitution in france, have Johns arrested, and had run
    mafias out of the country) told the author that he was going to have him
    arrested by the FBI (van'd) because the author suggested there was no sin
    in marrying young girls (and cited a bible verse in support of that).
    http://np237.livejournal.com/3...

  15. DontForgtDebian's opinion on "anti-systemd people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Debian's opinion on "anti-systemd people":

    http://etbe.coker.com.au/2015/...

    For some reason the men in the Linux community who hate women the most seem to have taken a dislike to systemd. I understand that being \u201cconservative\u201d might mean not wanting changes to software as well as not wanting changes to inequality in society but even so this surprised me. My last blog post about systemd has probably set a personal record for the amount of misogynistic and homophobic abuse I received in the comments. More gender and sexuality related abuse than I usually receive when posting about the issues of gender and sexuality in the context of the FOSS community! For the record this doesn\u2019t bother me, when I get such abuse I\u2019m just going to write more about the topic in question.

    While the issue of which init system to use by default in Debian was being discussed we had a lot of hostility from unimportant people who for some reason thought that they might get their way by being abusive and threatening people. As expected that didn\u2019t give the result they desired, but it did result in a small trend towards people who are less concerned about the reactions of users taking on development work related to init systems.

    The next thing that they did was to announce a \u201cfork\u201d of Debian. Forking software means maintaining a separate version due to a serious disagreement about how it should be maintained. Doing that requires a significant amount of work in compiling all the source code and testing the results. The sensible option would be to just maintain a separate repository of modified packages as has been done many times before. One of the most well known repositories was the Debian Multimedia repository, it was controversial due to flouting legal issues (the developer produced code that was legal where they lived) and due to confusion among users. But it demonstrated that you can make a repository containing many modified packages. In my work on SE Linux I\u2019ve always had a repository of packages containing changes that haven\u2019t been accepted into Debian, which included changes to SysVInit in about 2001.

    The latest news on the fork-Debian front seems to be the call for donations [4]. Apparently most of the money that was spent went to accounting fees and buying a laptop for a developer. The amount of money involved is fairly small, Forbes has an article about how awful people can use \u201ccontroversy\u201d to get crowd-funding windfalls [5].

    MikeeUSA is an evil person who hates systemd [6]. This isn\u2019t any sort of evidence that systemd is great (I\u2019m sure that evil people make reasonable choices about software on occasion). But it is a significant factor in support for non-systemd variants of Debian (and other Linux distributions). Decent people don\u2019t want to be associated with people like MikeeUSA, the fact that the anti-systemd people seem happy to associate with him isn\u2019t going to help their cause.

  16. Congratulations by MythicalMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was about to make an ironical comment but decided to send a positive message. I will do the same when they release the next version (supposing that I will still be alive at that time).

    --
    --- Signature? You must be kidding!
  17. In related news by terjeber · · Score: 0

    A ten year old boy in Santa Monica has purchased a strawberry ice-cream with the intention to consume it instantly.

  18. Congratulations to the team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great news. Congratulations to the team for their accomplishment and for their dedication. I think we will all benefit from the long-awaited emergence of HURD as a choice of kernel. People now have the choice of a microkernel, which may be a superior choice in some applications. We now have a GPLv3-or-later license for an essential component of the operating system. And, as others have pointed out, we now have a release of Debian that is likely to remain systemd-free, providing everyone with a way to continue using the GNU system without being exposed to any future mission creep by systemd.

    And finally, the Great Naming Wars might see a reprieve. Instead of choosing between GNU/Linux and 'Linux' to refer to the operating system, maybe people using the HURD kernel can just say they just use the GNU operating system. A man can dream!

  19. Great, all we need now is the right major crisis by xiando · · Score: 1

    All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the GNU World Order.

  20. Does it run ... by hritcu · · Score: 1

    Does it run emacs?

    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    1. Re:Does it run ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course :)