Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Brings Office To Android Smartphones For Free

Mark Wilson writes: After a few weeks in preview, Microsoft Office is now available for Android smartphones. Despite Microsoft's mobile-first, cloud-first philosophy, it has actually taken some time to bring the world's most popular office suite to Android phones — it joins the tablet version of the suite that was released last year. Just like the tablet editions, the phone versions of Word, Excel, and PowerPoint won't cost you a penny, allowing for the viewing and editing of a range of files when on the move. There is a cloud focus with support for not only OneDrive, but also Google Drive, Dropbox, and Box, and Microsoft says it has made changes based on the feedback received during the preview period.

85 comments

  1. Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, what does this really mean? Is the payment option viewing ads? Privacy rape? Viewing ads and privacy rape?

    1. Re:Free? by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Limited functionality unless you have an Office 365 account you can sign into to unlock all the features.

    2. Re:Free? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      Free means no charge and there are no ads. You only pay if you want to use advanced features that you need to have an Office 365 subscription to unlock.

    3. Re:Free? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      But the average person likely only cares about viewing and simple editing tasks which can be done without the Office 365 subscription.

    4. Re:Free? by ledow · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Advanced features" like being able to write in a blank document, or change a character in an existing one.

      Basically it's view-only unless you pay.

      That's not so bad for smartphone, but absolutely no different to the tablet versions at all (which are effectively useless beyond being a free document viewer, which you can get thousands of).

    5. Re:Free? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or Office for that matter.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Free? by muirhead · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've installed it to edit my CV. Most features are there, and I could open and edit a new blank doc. You need a Microsoft account to sign on, but an Office 365 subscription isn't needed. Who going to be worried about tracked changes whilst using a tablet?

    7. Re:Free? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not correct. From the only authoritative source -- Microsoft themselves:

      "Sign in with a free Microsoft account to create, edit and save documents for home use. A qualifying Office 365 subscription is required to create, edit and save documents for business use."

      And... "1. INSTALLATION AND USE RIGHTS.

      a. Consumer Use. You may install and use one copy of the software on Android Phone devices you own or control in order to view existing documents. As allowed by the software, you may also create, edit or save documents for non-commercial use purposes.

      b. Commercial Use. You may install and use one copy of the software on Android Phone devices you own or control in order to view existing documents. As allowed by the software, you may also create, edit or save documents for commercial use purposes IF you are a commercial Microsoft Office 365 subscriber with mobile device rights subject to the following terms:

      Refer to your existing license terms for Microsoft Office 365 with mobile device rights (the “service”) to identify the entity licensing the software to you and for support information. The terms and conditions for the service apply to your use of the software. However, the software’s privacy statement applies to your use of the software in addition to the privacy statement for the service. You may find the privacy statement within the software, and as applicable, on the app store from which you obtained the software. You may use and install copies of the software on Android Phone devices you own or control subject to the service terms and conditions so long as you have a valid subscription license to the service that includes mobile device rights. If there is a conflict between the service terms and conditions and the above, the terms in this Section 1.b apply."


      And finally... "Premium features on your Android tablet and phone with Office 365

      Core editing is available for free on Android devices with screen sizes of 10.1 inches or less. The extra features below are available on Android tablets and phones with a qualifying Office 365 subscription. For information about the extra security and control features that are available for customers with an Office 365 for business plan, visit the mobile apps for business page.

      Word

      Track and review changes
      Change page orientation
      Insert page and section breaks
      Highlight table cells with custom color shading
      Enable columns in page layout
      Customize headers and footers for different pages

      PowerPoint

      Save ink annotations from slide shows
      Highlight table cells with custom color shading

      A qualifying Office 365 subscription is required to use the premium features"


      That's not free, it's payware with a non-commercial use, feature-crippled, time-unlimited trial that has basic features removed which even home users would want such as page orientation, breaks, table colors and headers / footers.

    8. Re:Free? by bondsbw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not correct.

      You might need to learn the difference between "Not correct" and "Pretty much exactly what you said, but I don't like it so I'm going to make a big deal where such is not warranted".

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    9. Re:Free? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Grandparent represented it as fully-featured other than obscure features like version tracking: That's not true. Microsoft are representing it as free, but for business use (which is the primary use for something like this), that's not true either.

      Sorry you don't like my post, but that doesn't make it any less correct.

    10. Re:Free? by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      To quote muirhead:

      Most features are there, and I could open and edit a new blank doc.

      You are the one who has created the straw man, stretching "most features are there" into "fully-features other than obscure features like version tracking".

      You also seem to be assuming that muirhead was talking about the commercial version. He never stated that or indicated it in any way. The average user, by far, would be subject to the consumer edition and not the commercial one, so this is also quite a stretch you made.

      It's not about whether I like your post, or whether you provided useful information. It's about you mixing FUD into your response.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    11. Re:Free? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      a) He implied most features are there. They're not. Exceptionally basic, entry-level features like the ability to rotate the page (!!) are missing unless you pay.

      b) If you were talking about the PC, I'd agree the average user would be non-commercial. However, we're not talking about the PC, we're talking about a phone version. You know who uses Office on their phone? Business folk who are trying to travel light. You know who doesn't typically use Office on their phone, and who if by some rare chance does use it on their phone, most likely uses it solely as a reader? Consumers.

      Therefore you are fundamentally incorrect, and Microsoft is being extremely misleading by representing it as free.

    12. Re:Free? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      No, they (MS) are not. And no, the poster (GP) implied no such thing. They are very quotable, if you would care to show us what you think implied any of that then please do demonstrate it to the class (with the applicable quotes). Also, show the stats that demonstrate which type of users are using the mobile version as I suspect you are making that up as well. In other words, I can find no evidence to support anything you said - not one thing. That is pretty bad, you should couch your FUD with some reality so that the rest can be seemingly true. I suppose now is the time to accuse you of being a paid shill. However, I do not believe they are as prevalent as some folks seem to think. Thus, I believe you are just delusional and/or willfully ignorant.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    13. Re: Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see both arguments, and my reaction is this would less confusing if they referred to it as Office Lite, so as not to confuse the full blown version and the gimped version.

  2. 104Mb by ledow · · Score: 4, Informative

    104Mb download just for Word on its own.

    Wow. Seems like all those years of bloated coding are coming back to bite them.

    Install office with very limited use on a mobile, and you lose half a Gig of internal storage on your smartphone and still might have to pay for an Office 365 subscription.

    1. Re:104Mb by gstoddart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow. Seems like all those years of bloated coding are coming back to bite them.

      Yeah, no kidding. Both Android and iOS have brought us smaller, leaner apps which take up far less space.

      Microsoft still wants to give us fat x86 binaries.

      Oh well, it's not like I'd be running this anyway.

      Once again, Microsoft is so heavily stuck in the "I'm a PC and he's a Mac" mindset they're incapable of looking past Office and Exchange.

      Good innovating there, Microsoft. The killer mobile app isn't a fucking Power Point slide.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:104Mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Wow. Seems like all those years of bloated coding are coming back to bite them.

      Fixed version: Wow. Seems like all those years of C# are coming back to bite them.

    3. Re:104Mb by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      The problem is phone manufacturers are holding everyone back to rape them on memory. We should be lambasting the phone companies for such pathetic offerings. Base memory on the cheapest pocket computer should be 32 GB

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:104Mb by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Maybe Android should allow apps to be installed on the SD card then. I think they used to. Did they bring back that feature yet? Maybe MS Word functionality doesn't mean a lot to you, but for many people, that's a small amount of space to give up if it actually supports viewing and editing files in a way that's compatible with the desktop versions.

      Also, my copy of OpenOffice is 316 MB installed. Why would Microsoft be expected to use less space just because it runs on a phone? If it really is full featured, it doesn't really matter what platform it's running on, it's still going to take up the same amount of space.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:104Mb by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would like to point out Windows 8.1 can run on a 16 GB partition with 1 GB of ram. Further, MS has historically always pushed hardware.

      What intel giveth, Microsoft taketh away

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:104Mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that it's not coded in C#. Nice FUD.

    7. Re:104Mb by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank God! Can you imagine how big the binary would have to be with all those statically linked .NET libraries?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:104Mb by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would I want to use either on a phone or smaller tablet?

      That's really the point here. Full-pop word processors are not only going to take up huge amounts of limited flash storage and RAM, but they aren't even necessary.

      I use Google's document, spreadsheet and slideshow offerings on my Nexus 5 and Nexus 7. They don't render every aspect of an Office document, though they are getting a lot better (Excel charts display pretty well in Sheets), but I'm really just looking for "good enough", in this case mainly reading, and maybe a very small amount of notation or editing. I'll go to my PC or notebook if I actually want to full blown spreadsheet work or composition. Even with a fully functional version of Word available for my smart devices, I wouldn't pay for the functionality because I'm not a masochist.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:104Mb by nine-times · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would like to point out Windows 8.1 can run on a 16 GB partition with 1 GB of ram.

      It can. Theoretically. Just don't install applications or updates, and you might have space enough to run the system and store a few documents.

    10. Re:104Mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's Write on the iPad is even larger.

    11. Re:104Mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      What do you mean, "smaller"? Apple's Write for iOS is over 200Mb.

    12. Re: 104Mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You dumbo. C# apps are quite compact. Even the runtime isn't that large.

    13. Re:104Mb by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe Android should allow apps to be installed on the SD card then. I think they used to. Did they bring back that feature yet?

      Yes. Some apps refuse to be moved, however, even user apps. Some of them will work if you move them forcibly, with Ti Backup. Others need to be moved with more care, to an ext formatted partition on your sd card which — I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong — I believe is now supported only on third-party roms.

      With that said, I have access to all three methods on my titan running SOKP, and I can't imagine why anyone would run a stock ROM for long anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:104Mb by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      Once again, Microsoft is so heavily stuck in the "I'm a PC and he's a Mac" mindset they're incapable of looking past Office and Exchange.

      Well, do you know how much money they are making from Office and Exchange?

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    15. Re:104Mb by JamesTRexx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Windows 8.1 can run on a 16 GB partition with 1 GB of ram

      Debian testing, Libreoffice, Eclipse, GIMP, Iceweasel, a whole bunch of other programs and utilities; 10G used on disk (including 2.3G home directory), about 1G RAM actively used of 3, the rest is cache.

      No matter how you look at it, Microsoft has never been in the lean and mean camp. Neither with OS nor Office, database, virtualisation software.
      Maybe open source development fosters a more efficient use of hardware by its nature?

      --
      home
    16. Re:104Mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...GIMP, Iceweasel, a whole bunch of other programs and utilities

      Yeah, what kind of programs and *cough* utilities? What sort perverted things are you up to on that 'puter of yours?

    17. Re:104Mb by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Is FUD OO? Is there a compiler for Linux? Enquiring minds need to know!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    18. Re:104Mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUD is a GNU project.

    19. Re:104Mb by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I would like to point out Windows 8.1 can run on a 16 GB partition with 1 GB of ram. Further, MS has historically always pushed hardware.

      What intel giveth, Microsoft taketh away

      The requirements have been the same from Vista- Windows 8.1. Hardware with those specs will run reasonably the same from Vista (SP2) through to Windows 8.1.

      I found it isn't Microsoft that taketh, as much as: Symantec, McAfee, Adobe, Firefox, and Google (Chrome).

      Further on Firefox and Chrome is web developers and websites takething more. On a 9 year old Windows PC that used to function very well, replacing nothing but the web browser, and plugins (like Flash) it is almost unusable on many websites. This isn't Microsoft's problem.

    20. Re:104Mb by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      IIRC, a typical large Xamarin app contains about 20 Mb of framework code before the linker strips everything that isn't actually used. This usually get reduced to several times less after linking. So in this case, I doubt you'd notice the difference.

    21. Re:104Mb by mjwx · · Score: 1

      104Mb download just for Word on its own.

      Thats not unusual these days. Almost all Android applications are getting pretty bloated. On my Android 5.1.1 phone, Chrome is 101 Mb, Facebook is 200 Mb, Google Docs, Sheets and Slides are 70 Mb a piece and even a simple forum viewer for Whirlpool is 10 Mb.

      Long gone are the days of applications being under 1 Mb. Seems like more than just 3 years ago though.

      Install office with very limited use on a mobile, and you lose half a Gig of internal storage on your smartphone and still might have to pay for an Office 365 subscription.

      That being true, this move is a clear sign that Microsoft is fearing the other office compatible products on Android, especially since Google have been pushing their own office products (that can read Office files, but saves them under Googles format).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    22. Re:104Mb by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      What sort perverted things are you up to on that 'puter of yours?

      I could tell you, but then you'd get a visit from people with a very dark fashion sense.

      Then again, you might be lucky and get psychologically scarred for life.

      --
      home
    23. Re:104Mb by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Flash memory has, historically, been very expensive which is why you don't see larger amounts. There's also the long lead time and certifications for any new product. That's probably two years, minimum, between initial spec and reaching end users.

      Not to mention that you're talking about low-end phones, which are always designed to hit the minimum specs. If you want bigger/faster, then you need to pony up for phones like the iPhone6 or Galaxy S6 which come with 64GB and 128GB options.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    24. Re:104Mb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most games on the phone are larger than that. If that much space is a big deal to you, maybe you need a newer phone.

    25. Re:104Mb by KGIII · · Score: 1

      This is not meant to be derogatory. Maybe OSS got its start with older, second-hand, computers? Personally, except for work, I made use of the various Linux distributions on older hardware, stuff that I had replaced with a new system, before I made the move to convert my regular computer. I also continued to use those systems, the older ones, longer than I would have had I not done so - which means I wrote code on them as well as used them for regular tasks. This may be an additional factor, though I doubt it is as prevalent now, nor is it likely the "deciding" factor.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    26. Re:104Mb by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The drivers are terrible and the bug reporting system is ignored.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    27. Re:104Mb by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      My phone has an HDMI port on it and it also support bluetooth keyboards. Why should I not be able to hook it up to a fullsize screen and keyboard to do a little bit of work if my phone has the capabilities? Phones are coming out with 3GB or more of RAM on them now, and Octocore processors. Probably won't be too long before we just plug our phones into docking stations and use them as a full computer for basic tasks like web browsing or word processing. I plug my tablet into my TV to play games, and I'm quite amazed at the graphics you can get out of that thing.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  3. For FREEeee...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there is something suspicious about all these freebies. Are they pre-installed with NSA spyware and backup spyware in case you succeed of deleting primary malware?

  4. Freemium ain't free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While you can download the apps for free, you get a lite version of the apps. To get full functionality, you have to have a paying subscription to Office 365.

  5. Free as in used beer free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you know what I mean.

    Live Free or Die!

  6. Even more ways to destroy my files! by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Funny

    Considering how poorly files move between different versions of Office for the same platform (and some times even between the same version for the same platform!) I look forward to now being able to trash my files on the go. Thank you Microsoft, I have been wishing for some time that you would find a way to make my files even more fragile yet.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Even more ways to destroy my files! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Considering how poorly files move between different versions of Office for the same platform (and some times even between the same version for the same platform!)

      I've seen this troll many times but never once in practice. Can you give me a concrete example that is easily reproducible or would affect a majority of users?

    2. Re:Even more ways to destroy my files! by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Considering how poorly files move between different versions of Office for the same platform (and some times even between the same version for the same platform!)

      Can you give me a concrete example that is easily reproducible or would affect a majority of users?

      I have personally lost files many times in office when I took a file from one PC to another, even when they are running the same version. Powerpoint is the worst offender, but I have lost Word documents as well. Recently my boss sent me a Powerpoint presentation that he made in Powerpoint for Mac and I had to deliver it in the latest version of Powerpoint for windows at a departmental seminar; I ended up with the distinction of being the first person to crash Powerpoint that day.

      That distinction might not have been so awful had I not been the first presenter of the morning.

      Your allegation of this being a "troll" is just silly. People lose files this way all the time. I can't even tell you how many presentations I've had destroyed by this. I don't know how you want me to give a "concrete example" but if you ask anyone who has used powerpoint or word for more than a couple years - particularly anyone who has used it across multiple versions or platforms - you're bound to not need to ask long before you find someone else who has had their files eat shit.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  7. Anyone else finding Office2013 slow? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0

    Our company switched to Office 2013 and forced us all to upgrade. I tried creating a powerpoint. Simple bullet point list. The cursor moves fluidly with some kind of animation etc. But selection, cut/past etc seem to have a lag that can not be explained. I am running it on a souped up high performance finite element solver machine, 16 cores, 64GB RAM, high powered graphics card etc. It seems to be pushing this one drive and cloud storage a lot, makes you jump through the hoops to save anything to a new local directory. As though it keeps synching the document with remote autosave, there is this annoying lag.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  8. Google Docs... by DarthVain · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or you could just use Google Docs in your browser. Unsurprisingly also supports Google Drive.

    So MS makes a pointless app, and makes it free!

  9. Why do I need the vendor lock-in? by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    I do not develop big complicated documents on my phone.

    For my phone, a standard text editor is more than enough.

    If somebody emails a .docx file, I'll wait until I am on a computer with LibreOffice.

    1. Re:Why do I need the vendor lock-in? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I do not develop big complicated documents on my phone.

      Oh, they will be complicated after you make them in MS-Office.

    2. Re:Why do I need the vendor lock-in? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      It's not bad to have a viewer app that'll render Word/Excel/Powerpoint properly though...

  10. Lemonade, bell-bottoms, and newspapers by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Ah, the sweet nostalgia of BSOD on my smartphone.

  11. Google Drive access with iOS Office version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did we get an update for the iOS version to save to Google Drive? Last I used it about a week ago we didn't!

  12. Re:Low quality software must be free (as in beer) by neilo_1701D · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... as that would show the absolutely low quality of their code

    What is directly known about Microsoft code doesn't support your argument. For example, after the Windows 2000 code leak several people did their own analysis of the code. For example, kuro5hin concluded:

    In short, there is nothing really surprising in this leak. Microsoft does not steal open-source code. Their older code is flaky, their modern code excellent. Their programmers are skilled and enthusiastic. Problems are generally due to a trade-off of current quality against vast hardware, software and backward compatibility.

    Note that last sentence: Problems are generally due to a trade-off of current quality against vast hardware, software and backward compatibility.

    More recently, static code analysis was done on the legally released Word for Windows 1.1a by PVS-Studio. They concluded:

    I have found very few strange fragments. There are two reasons for that. Firstly, I found the code to be skillfully and clearly written. Secondly, the analysis had to be incomplete, while teaching the analyzer the specifics of the old C language wouldn't be of any use.

    In short, there may be many reasons not to pay for Microsoft's software. Your perception of the quality of their code is not one.

  13. Your Name is Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry,

    But we've figured out we don't need crappy MS versions of software anymore. The more I use Google Docs/Drive the more I realize how bad Microsoft products actually are. And the world has discovered that Microsoft is not the only game in town, in spite of nearly 30 years of dominance. All things come to an end. This has been coming for some time. Good Riddance.

  14. Google should move on by denisbergeron · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Now, Microsoft have a Cloud interface that works on all platform (Win, IOS, OSX, Linux), Google don't.
    Now, Microsoft have a Office suite that works on all platform (WIn, Ios, Osx, Linux) Google don't.

    It's amazing how a year change in the software market. Yesterday google was the leader, now they aren't there.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:Google should move on by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's odd. I can use Google Drive, create documents and spreadsheets on all the above platforms, download them in multiple formats and edit them on other platforms.

      Why would I pay Microsoft money for that which I can already do?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Google should move on by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 may very well kill Android on the tablet. I have a very nice Android tablet but I seldom turn it on at all since I got this Asus Transformer with x86 Windows 8,1 on it. Everything is crippled on a toy OS.

    3. Re:Google should move on by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm surprised Windows 8 hasn't already killed Android on tablets. Guess it takes people a while to realize how bad Android is. I have a Surface 2 RT, and the OS itself is so much better than Android. It's a shame developers didn't latch on to the Windows app store more. It's truly a joy to use this device. Android really is quite crippled. No native support for multiple apps. No native support for Google Drive (developer has to write their own code to support it). No native support for network shares. Doesn't come with a command line.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Google should move on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it runs on the device, and files can stay on the device, then you're not giving google all that delicious data to mine, and not exposing that data to potential hacks of 'the cloud'. duh. "cloud apps" are not appropriate for, or are outright illegal to use, in some industries.

    5. Re:Google should move on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but you only have to check out all the comments on here on why Windows on a tablet isn't more popular. Microsoft gives away free Office and all they get here is hate. These are the nerds non-technical people turn to when they're looking to buy tech. And almost all of them on here hate Microsoft because of something that happened from 20 years ago or because it's not Linux. Microsoft could open source everything tomorrow and these haters would still go on with their tired "it's a trap!" bullshit.

    6. Re:Google should move on by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      So other than your paranoia, there is no actual advantage.

      And before you start talking about "staying on the device", I had to go and actively disable all the Skydrive crap on my notebook, so they're all playing that game.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  15. Tried it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried it before, and I still prefer SoftMaker:

    https://play.google.com/store/search?q=softmaker&c=apps

  16. And? by Nexzus · · Score: 1

    I was creating Word and Excel documents, for free as they were included in the OS, more than a decade ago on my trusty iPaq 6315.

    Why is this news?

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    1. Re: And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different OS obviously? This is an announcement for a platform release. No one is saying mobile document editing is an innovation.

  17. Do Not Want! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject.

  18. Thanks but no thanks by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 1

    It's bad enough that MS is harassing every phone/tablet manufacturer to pay some sort of "Android tax", because of "reasons". I'd like to see a single manufacturer stand up to this kind of crap, but so far that's not happening. I don't want MS anywhere near my phone.

    --
    Buck Feta. You know what to do.
    1. Re:Thanks but no thanks by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      I'm not buying it.

      Our patent system is broken, and msft is exploiting it, simple as that.

      If somebody stole a real invention that would be one thing. But we both know that msft patents have almost nothing to do with real inventions.

      What did Microsoft really invent? What did Apple really invent? Yet they have patents by the thousands.

    2. Re:Thanks but no thanks by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Let me translate..."Wahh I don't like the laws as written because it hurts the OS I wave a flag for, so its "exploitation" to use the patents as the law intended"...is that REALLY your position?

      If you don't like the laws? Form a PAC, do a ton of E-Begging, then bribe congress critters until you get the law changed.....but don't be surprised when you go to big Linux corps like Google and Red Hat and they tell you to pound sand, because the current system benefits them too by raising the barrier of entry to potential competition....or is it your position that GOOG and RHEL are "exploiters" too?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  19. "won't cost you a penny" is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the case of iDevices, they got Apple's help in exchange for screwing over most Apple owners. Cook has a burning hatred of his customers that don't upgrade, and in the case of Microsoft, he demanded they not allow anyone without at least version 7.1 use Office. He got his way. Only a small percentage of devices can run Office without paying Apple hundreds of dollars. Calling spending hundreds of dollars free is disgusting. You're better than that /. Please stop spouting corporate nonsense. Apple hates us and has screwed us with Office.

  20. Re:/. is all corporate shills now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allstate has left children in the cold to die

    Are you talking about the incident in Boston when they left a mother and four children with no place to go after their house burned with their car in the garage? The father was in Iraq at the time. It took a child dying and the father getting killed in Iraq before they finally got enough bad press to where they caved and paid a fraction of the claim. In Allstate's defense, they didn't do anything any other insurance company would have done in the same situation. They saw someone weak that they could prey on. Every dollar you collect on premiums earns you pennies of profit, but every dollar not paid on a legitimate claim earns you an entire dollar.

  21. "For Free" vs "Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because they allow me the *privilege* of downloading the app without me paying doesn't make it 'Free'.

    90% of the app is locked behind an Office 365 Subscription.

  22. Free? by null+etc. · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With all the money that Microsoft charges for patents used by Android, I'd hardly call it free.

  23. It's a trap! by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft is just trying to get everybody locked in to their proprietary format.

  24. That's Free as in Lunch by jcbarlow · · Score: 1

    TNSTAAFL

    1. Re:That's Free as in Lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > TNSTAAFL
      IAPACTITIIITGSFN... only if you are a neckbeard.

  25. cloud first? ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ffs, let me save documents to the device. tyvm.

  26. Mb!=MB - Re:104Mb by short · · Score: 1

    So you mean 13MB? That's still pretty big.

  27. Do Not Get! by KGIII · · Score: 1

    See subject.

    (Pretty simple, really.)

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."