Slashdot Mirror


The Underfunded, Disorganized Plan To Save Earth From the Next Giant Asteroid

New submitter citadrianne sends a story about the beginnings of our asteroid defense efforts, and how initial concern over an asteroid strike wasn't sustained long enough to establish consistent funding: Until a few decades ago, the powers that be didn't take the threat of asteroids very seriously. This changed on March 23, 1989, when an asteroid 300 meters in diameter called 1989FC passed within half a million miles of Earth. As the New York Times put it, "In cosmic terms, it was a close call." After this arguably close brush with total annihilation, Congress asked NASA to prepare a report on the threat posed by asteroids. The 1992 document, "The Spaceguard Survey: Report of the NASA International Near-Earth-Object Detection Workshop," was, suffice it to say, rather bleak.

If a large NEO were to hit Earth, the report said, its denizens could look forward to acid rain, firestorms, and an impact winter induced by dust being thrown miles into the stratosphere. ... After reports from the National Research Council made it clear that meeting the discovery requirement outlined in the Congressional mandate was impossible given the lack of program funding, NEOO got a tenfold budget increase from 2009 to 2014. Yet it still faces a number of difficulties. A program audit released last September described the NEOO program as a one-man operation that is poorly integrated and lacking in objectives and oversight.

88 comments

  1. Armageddon by Raannndy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that one man Bruce Willis? I think we're safe if it is.

    1. Re:Armageddon by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Plus, Ben Affleck is probably good with any plan that gets him as far away as possible from his wife.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Armageddon by operagost · · Score: 2

      Despite the moronic summary, there are actually 3 people assigned full-time to the NEOO office. So they can at least afford Ben Affleck and Billy Bob Thornton too.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. What plan? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A plan to save us from NEOs would require some ability to actually reach an NEO before it hit.

    Since we're not working to develop that capability, pretty much anything else we do is irrelevant....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:What plan? by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Funny

      No worries, SpaceX will get us there!

      [whispering from off camera]....okay.....wait, WHAT happened?......No I didn't even turn on the news this weekend.....

      Okay, a minor revision to that....

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:What plan? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A plan to save us from NEOs would require some ability to actually reach an NEO before it hit.

      Not necessarily. We could find a way to jump some of us aside, or heat up one side of it with lasers from afar, or burrow until the crisis is over, or have congress declare it a non-problem, or have religious people pray for a miracle.

      I think the simplest solution is the better one. Let them hit. Evolution will take care of the aftermath. It already has weeded out large landbound reptiles that can't take the heat (or the cold) due to meteor strikes. If the Yucatan big boy hadn't hit, there might have been scaly beings in charge now. Other than lawyers, I mean.

    3. Re:What plan? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      A plan to save us from NEOs would require some ability to actually reach an NEO before it hit.

      Except the "giant lasers" plan. That just requires us to make much bigger lasers, and probably also bigger sharks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:What plan? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      It already has weeded out large landbound reptiles that can't take the heat (or the cold) due to meteor strikes.

      I really, really hope you're not talking about dinosaurs here. Since dinosaurs were more closely related to birds than reptiles (why do you think they move Aves under Dinosauria recently?)....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:What plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we are : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philae_(spacecraft)

    6. Re:What plan? by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We send spacecraft on comparable missions all the time. And it doesn't really take a spectacularly large payload to destroy (yes, destroy) an asteroid a few hundred meters in diameter. 1/2-kilometer-wide Itokawa could be blown into tiny bits which would not recoalesce, via a 0,5-1,0 megatonne nuclear warhead, a typical size in modern nuclear arsenals (in addition, the little pieces would be pushed out of their current orbit).

      I know it's a common misconception that "nuking" an asteroid would simply create a few large fragments that would hit Earth with even more devastation, but that's not backed by simulation data. And anyway, even if it didn't blow the asteroid to tiny bits (which simulations say it would) and even if it didn't push the remaining pieces off trajectory (which they say it does), anything that spreads an Earth impact out over a larger period of time is a good thing - it means the higher percentage of the energy that's absorbed high in the atmosphere rather than reaching the surface (less ejecta, lower ocean waves, a broader (weaker) distribution of the heat pulse, etc), the weaker the shockwaves, the weaker the total heat at any given point in time, and the more time for Earth to radiate away any imparted energy or precipitate out any ejecta cloud. If the choice is between 15 Chelyabink-sized impactor (most of which will strike places where they won't even be witnessed) or one Meteor Crater-sized impactor (same total mass), pick the Chelyabinsk ones. 50 10-megatonne meteor crater impactors or one 500-megatonne Upheaval Dome impactor? Pick the former. The asteroid impacts calculator shows the former generating a negligible fireball and 270mph wind burst at 2km distance, while the latter creates the same winds 25km away (156 times the area) and a fireball that even 25km away is 50 times brighter than the sun, hot enough to instantly set most materials on fire.

      But that's all irrelevant because, quite simply, simulations show that nuclear weapons do work against asteroids.

      What we need is enough detection lead time to be able to launch a nuclear strike a few months before the impact date (to give time for the debris to disperse). There is no need to "land" or "drill" for the warhead. There is no pressure wave; instead, an immense burst of X-rays is absorbed through the outer skin of the asteroid on the side of the explosion, causing it to vaporize (unevenly) from within, especially near the ground zero point, and creating powerful shockwaves throughout its body. In addition to ripping it apart, the vaporized material and higher energy ejecta flies off, predominantly on the side where the explosion was detonated, acting a broad planar thruster.

      --
      Dear Lord: One of your creatures may be hurt tonight. Please let it be the other creature.
    7. Re:What plan? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know you were being snide.

      That said, the ability to reach an NEO means putting a multiton spacecraft farther out (in deltaV terms) than we've ever gone before.

      Something meant to put men on Mars MIGHT be suitable. Or not, depending on the orbit of the particular NEO that turns out to be a threat.

      Yes, we're likely to have years of warning to develop the needed hardware. But "likely" isn't certainty, and it would really suck to waste ten years mapping NEOs only to discover that the last one we found was going to impact in nineteen months....

      Which is why the development of suitable spacecraft should be done in parallel with the search for NEO's, NOT in series with the search....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:What plan? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I meant all the various giant members of what's commonly/historically known as reptilia, including (but not limited to) archosaurs like dinosaurs, pterosaurs and many of the larger/landbound members of crocodilia and aves (birds).

      If you're huge, at least somewhat ectothermic, and can't easily migrate, climate change won't be your friend, and evolution will eventually tally the score as "extinct".
      Hm... I wonder whether that applies to Americans too...

    9. Re:What plan? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Since we're not working to develop that capability, pretty much anything else we do is irrelevant....

      We don't need to 'work towards' a capability we already have. On a global scale, let alone locally (in the US), launchers are rolling off the assembly lines on a regular basis - and it's likely we'll have months (at worst) to years warning before an impact. (We're actually much better off in that respect than we were in 1989.)

      Development of a payload needn't take that long either, especially with a Manhattan/Apollo Project style development program.

    10. Re:What plan? by Punko · · Score: 1

      One of the simplest questions is How big an NEO do we need to stop? Once you realize our ability to stop NEOs is very limited (in terms of mass) and is 100% dependent on early detection, the initial focus should be on improving detection of NEOs. And even then, the future may be : "INBOUND NEO >90% CHANCE OF EARTH IMPACT --- MASS IS ESTIMATED TO BE . . . oh crap" and now we're back at the current stage of hoping it misses.

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    11. Re:What plan? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      requires us to make much bigger lasers, and probably also bigger sharks.

      We have 'em; they're called "bankers".

    12. Re:What plan? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Something meant to put men on Mars MIGHT be suitable. Or not, depending on the orbit of the particular NEO that turns out to be a threat.

      I'd think it likely wouldn't be enough, because a NEO won't have the mass of Mars which we'd use to brake the craft once there. Unless we were sending an impact missile, it might take a lot of time and planning to get there. Rosetta took 10 years and a flyby of Mars in order to match up with a comet.

    13. Re:What plan? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Rosetta (the craft carrying Philae) took ten years to get there, and required a flyby of Mars and Lutetia to get its vectors and speed right.

      And is so small that it's like a fly landing on a townhouse. What's the fly supposed to do? Ask the townhouse to move over?

    14. Re:What plan? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      I do recognise that your post is certainly impressive (by assuming that all this information is right, what seems to be the case), although it also shows the human's temerity of seriously thinking that they can control what they cannot.

      Even a routine rocket launch is a very big deal for us (yesterday's SpaceX "incident" was an excellent proof). That is: a completely static situation where we only have to make sure that all the parts are assembled correctly. Things get extremely more complex when uncontrollable, moving objects come into picture.

      I do think that doing some research on the "let's prepare for the worst" front might be useful, but these attempts shouldn't ever hide the reality. And the reality is that we are here by pure chance and will continue being for as long as pure chance will allow us to continue.

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    15. Re:What plan? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And anyway, even if it didn't blow the asteroid to tiny bits (which simulations say it would) and even if it didn't push the remaining pieces off trajectory (which they say it does)
      Can you show us those simulations?

      A nuclear warhead has lots of trouble to even "hit" an asteroid. "Hit" in quotes as the nuke needs to be close and detonate in the right moment. That you can only achieve with a correct adjustment of the course and not by simply hitting it from the front. A millisecond to early or to late and the nuke is at the wrong position and has neglectible effect.

      In addition to ripping it apart,

      How do you come to that assumption? Ever seen an asteroid? There are plenty of photos of asteroids.

      I would wager that a thing made of solid stone, solid iridium, solid coal, solid gold with a thin layer of dirt that has already proven that it survived over the course of 4 billion years hundreds of thousands of impacts of rocks that often had more or less the same size as the asteroid in question simply will shrug off a "mere punny nuke" ;D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    16. Re:What plan? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The worst case for a warning are mere days when a NEO comes more or less directly from the sun.

      We have no real warning system. What we need are a few space probes that orbit the sun in a polar orbit. That means perpendicular to the ecliptic.

      That we don't have so far.

      And as I corrected the nuke fanatic above: our launchers and nukes are not capable to do much against an asteroid that is hitting us in lets say 30 days.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:What plan? by Rei · · Score: 1

      How do you come to that assumption?

      By linking to a peer-reviewed paper on the subject?

      A nuclear warhead has lots of trouble to even "hit" an asteroid.

      Essentially every space mission we have launched for the past several decades has had to navigate with a far more precision than that needed to get close to an asteroid and activate a single trigger event when close by.

      --
      Dear Lord: One of your creatures may be hurt tonight. Please let it be the other creature.
    18. Re:What plan? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The worst case for a warning are mere days when a NEO comes more or less directly from the sun.

      If you're going to measure capability only against the rarest and worst case, you can safely be ignored as complete fool.

      And as I corrected the nuke fanatic above

      Looked thorough your postings, and I didn't find any 'correction', just ignorant handwaving bullshit that serves only to confirm the above impression that you are in fact a complete ignorant fool.

    19. Re:What plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really, really hope you're not talking about dinosaurs here. Since dinosaurs were more closely related to birds than reptiles (why do you think they move Aves under Dinosauria recently?)....

      What! How dare they do that. The science was settled.

    20. Re:What plan? by whodunit · · Score: 1

      After the last time this topic came up on Slashdot (complete with a long argument over whether retaining nukes for anti-asteroid work was wise) I was doing some Wikipedia browsing and came upon this tidbit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      "An April 2014 GAO report notes that the NNSA is retaining canned subassemblies (CSAs) " associated with a certain warhead indicated as excess in the 2012 Production and Planning Directive are being retained in an indeterminate state pending a senior-level government evaluation of their use in planetary defense against earthbound asteroids."[10] In its FY2015 budget request, the NNSA noted that the B53 component disassembly was "delayed", leading some observers to conclude they might be the warhead CSAs being retained for potential planetary defense purposes."

      In that prior thread there was a lot of pooh-poohing the need for nukes because even a small, non-nuclear impact can nudge an orbital trajectory out of an impact course.... IF it's applied months or even years ahead of time. That doesn't do us any good for a big rock we spot far too late - but a massive 9 megaton nuke like the B53 is a different story. Now, how about delivering it?

      The bomb - in its planetary weapon role - weighed four tons (about 3600 kilograms.) Lets assume that the mass of the completed bomb (no longer needed for parachutes, etc,) is allocated to RCS systems, gyroscopes, a small engine and fuel for terminal intercept course correction, so it stays at a hefty four imperial tons. What could lift this hefty package?

      As it turns out, a whole lot of things: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Note that the biggest of those rockets can lift well in excess of the 3600kg of the weapon, which allows them plenty of spare delta-V for a TLI injection (for a gravity-assist slingshot around the moon,) and the biggest Atlas V can put a staggering 12,000kg into sun-synchronous orbit, so it can almost certainly put 3600kg into solar orbit. There's plenty of delta-v in these vehicles for highly-elliptical, fuel-inefficient, time-efficient intercept orbits. If that's not enough, we actually REACHED a comet in a highly-elliptical solar orbit with a spacecraft of almost 3,000kg mass (well within the weight limits of dozens of smaller nuclear bombs that would be sufficient to nudge an impactor off-course given a long-range intercept,) and the stories about this spacecraft (Rosetta) have been all over /. in the past few months.

      How do comments this clueless get modded to +5!?

    21. Re:What plan? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Then link the peer reviewed paper, so we can also review it ;D

      Essentially every space mission we have launched for the past several decades has had to navigate
      Obviously. And obviously a nuclear missile wont be able to do that. That is my point. Just like our space probes you would need decades to get a nuke close enough to an asteroid to have any effect at all.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    22. Re:What plan? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      you can safely be ignored as complete fool
      No you can't.
      The worst case is just as likely as the optimal case.

      you are in fact a complete ignorant fool I have a few university papers that proof otherwise ;D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re:What plan? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wouldn't that be great if I had linked it in my first post, and then if you had actually read my post well enough to see it?

      --
      Dear Lord: One of your creatures may be hurt tonight. Please let it be the other creature.
    24. Re:What plan? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You linked to an abstract of paper. Not to a paper.
      It contains nothing of what you claim.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re:What plan? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      A plan to save us from NEOs would require some ability to actually reach an NEO before it hit.

      Any plan to reach a NEO before it hits requires some ability to detect them (preferably when they're far enough away that we only need to give them a gentle nudge).

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  3. Gov program performs audit to ask for more money.. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Troll

    TLDR: Government program commissions its own audit to ask for more money.

  4. Asteroid Impact? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    Buckle your seatbelt Dorothy, 'cause Kansas is going bye-bye!

  5. "In cosmic terms, it was a close call." by Nutria · · Score: 1

    But we don't live in cosmic terms; we live in human terms, and 425,000 miles is really far away!

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:"In cosmic terms, it was a close call." by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Erm, I suggest you look up at night and locate that big shiny thing.

      425,000 miles is roughly twice as far as that shiny thing is away ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:"In cosmic terms, it was a close call." by Nutria · · Score: 1

      So? That big shiny thing isn't going to hit us either.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:"In cosmic terms, it was a close call." by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And, what has that to do with the topic?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:"In cosmic terms, it was a close call." by Nutria · · Score: 1

      And, what has that to do with the topic?

      Huh? You're the one who first mentioned the Moon.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:"In cosmic terms, it was a close call." by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes, because you claimed that 450,000 miles would be far away. It is not. An asteroid approaching earth makes like 40miles per second.
      That means in 3 to 4 hours it has passed that distance.
      So relatively speaking it is as close as Paris is to my home town ... 3h travel time.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  6. Dude has a good deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NEOO got a tenfold budget increase from 2009 to 2014. Yet it still faces a number of difficulties. A program audit released last September described the NEOO program as a one-man operation that is poorly integrated and lacking in objectives and oversight.

    He got a 10x increase in salary, but doesn't have a boss.

    1. Re:Dude has a good deal by vovin · · Score: 1

      Not to worry. If the plan fails I'm sure he will be ask to resign.

    2. Re:Dude has a good deal by arth1 · · Score: 1

      This needs to be funded as one of the faith based initiatives that the last two presidents have pushed.

  7. More to the point by rnws · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given that these sorts of events have consequences on a planetary scale and that little things like nation-states mean absolutely nothing if we lose the species, why the hell isn't this an international effort? Why does the USA have to do all the grunt-work? (I'm not a yank BTW). This really is something I could get behind the UN for actually doing something useful lately. (The UN has done SFA of use since eradicating smallpox).

    1. Re:More to the point by chispito · · Score: 1

      Given that these sorts of events have consequences on a planetary scale and that little things like nation-states mean absolutely nothing if we lose the species, why the hell isn't this an international effort? Why does the USA have to do all the grunt-work? (I'm not a yank BTW). This really is something I could get behind the UN for actually doing something useful lately. (The UN has done SFA of use since eradicating smallpox).

      Because we already drafted the blueprint.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:More to the point by arobatino · · Score: 1

      The OP's article doesn't mention that the original target of discovering 90 percent of NEOs with a size of 1 km or greater (extinction-size) has already been achieved. The bar has been lowered to 140 m, but those aren't an extinction threat.

    3. Re:More to the point by chispito · · Score: 1
      Did you really mean to post this in response to my terrible Armageddon pun?

      The OP's article doesn't mention that the original target of discovering 90 percent of NEOs with a size of 1 km or greater (extinction-size) has already been achieved. The bar has been lowered to 140 m, but those aren't an extinction threat.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re: More to the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some other efforts on this, like http://sentinelmission.org

    5. Re:More to the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conversation goes like this:

      We should do something.
      Yep, we should.
      Definitely.
      Absolutely.
      You first.
      No, you.

      repeat.

  8. Like whizzing in the ocean by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    It's interesting that we can even start to think about doing something about this, but in reality, it's only slightly removed from the question "What do we do if the sun goes into red giant mode?"

    The answer by the way, is "not much".

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Like whizzing in the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the idea to develop a propulsion system that allows for interstellar travel before that happens?

    2. Re:Like whizzing in the ocean by hodet · · Score: 1

      Is that a risk? Digging back to grade 4 science here, but isn't that supposed to happen in a few billion years or so?

    3. Re:Like whizzing in the ocean by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Is that a risk? Digging back to grade 4 science here, but isn't that supposed to happen in a few billion years or so?

      That's the point. It is a little difficult trying to envision us doing anything about Sol going red giant.

      And imagine a Shoemaker-Levy type incident with a whole batch of space objects flying into the earth in short order. The only thing I can think of is nuts as diverters, but would there be enough? and would we want to build more as a just in case scenario?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Like whizzing in the ocean by hodet · · Score: 1

      Right! Duh....missed your context there. :-)

    5. Re:Like whizzing in the ocean by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Isn't the idea to develop a propulsion system that allows for interstellar travel before that happens?

      Unless someone works out a way of travelling faster than the speed of light, interstellar travel will never happen.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Like whizzing in the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wormholes are still feasible aren't they? we'll never know if we don't make the attempt.

      We don't know everything. sometimes you have to make the attempt to do something to discover how it might actually succeed.

  9. Roads by unixcorn · · Score: 1

    "...how initial concern over an asteroid strike wasn't sustained long enough to establish consistent funding..."

    I would be much happier if we could sustain concern over our infrastructure like roads and bridges and forget about something that will probably never happen in our lifetimes or our great grand children's lifetimes.

    1. Re:Roads by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I would be much happier if we could sustain concern over our infrastructure like roads and bridges and forget about something that will probably never happen in our lifetimes or our great grand children's lifetimes.

      Your great-grandchildren probably won't care about your roads and bridges either, other than the cost of repairing them. These days, they're not built like Roman roads and bridges, and don't last for generations.

    2. Re:Roads by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      These days, they're not built like Roman roads and bridges, and don't last for generations.

      The roman roads wouldn't last for generations without maintenance... and their maintenance costs helped bankrupt the empire. Hilariously, today road maintenance companies with Italian names are being drug through court for the offensively bad job they did around northern California. Less hilariously, the taxpayer is currently paying for some of those "repairs" to be repaired again. Last night I drove over the parts they're about to patch between Lakeport and Kelseyville on the CA 29, and it's a bunch of short disconnected sections so it'll be like speed bumps again in short order. Some of them are 80% of the width of the lane, to save a few bucks they're creating uneven lanes. Lake County CA has become a bedroom community for the Bay Area, and people are actually commuting now into there from parts beyond like Ukiah — if you're going into the East Bay, as bad as traffic is around the central BA and where the 101 passes through it, it may well make sense to go over St. Helena. Which, by the way, is also under maintenance right now, because California. A commuter coming from Ukiah might well face over an hour of delays alone (let alone secondary effects) if they don't know which back roads to take. I guess I forgot to mention the roundabout they're building at the intersection of CA 20 and CA 29.

      I did mention the 101, though, which is still horrible. It's easily one of the worst freeways in the USA. It's the road I bring up any time anyone suggests building roadways out of concrete, or anything similar.

      On the other hand, the Romans had very different standards. They didn't expect to carry multiple lanes of traffic at 80 miles per

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Aliens will help us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there's any major threat to humanity such as a global nuclear war or an asteroid, aliens will intervene and save us from ourselves or from the asteroid.

    1. Re:Aliens will help us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also God, but for some reason he is limiting himself to actions that won't prove his existence. Nowadays scientists are measuring everything to 10 digits of accuracy which makes it increasingly harder for him to intervene. We can save ourselves by reverting to a more primitive lifestyle. In particular, burn every asteroid tracking observatory to allow God to change asteroid orbits unnoticed.

    2. Re:Aliens will help us by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      This anonymous coward has a point. We might even apply these ideas to other problems.

      Let's detroy all our technology and trust that God (any of them) will get the message!

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    3. Re:Aliens will help us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "measuring everything to 10 digits of accuracy "

      That's actually precision.

    4. Re:Aliens will help us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the Disclosure Project. There are documented cases of unidentified craft disarming nuclear warheads in Britain and the US.

      It is small minded to think that humans are the only intelligent life form in the universe. Think of the billions of stars in our galaxy and the billions of galaxies in the universe. Think about civilizations that are thousands, millions or billions of years more evolved and technologically advanced than we are. Physicists are still employed today because there are still new physics to be discovered. Science here on Earth is in its very infancy. Just because we don't yet understand the physics of interstellar travel, it doesn't mean that it is not possible.

  11. Expanding the scope sometimes help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and an impact winter induced by dust being thrown miles into the stratosphere

    So I suppose that regular impacts by small asteroids would cool the planet and, if we do it right, exactly cancel global warming? If they added this to their program, they'd get tons of funding.

  12. Brush with total annihilation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is just over the top.

  13. NEO deniers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just hope it's big enough to kill us all without leaving those who will say it was a false-flag operation..

  14. Re:Gov program performs audit to ask for more mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *One-man* government program writes his own audit to ask for more money.

  15. 3.5 full time employees by virens · · Score: 1

    From TFA it seems that we have "3.5 full time employees" (wow, so much for protecting the Mother-Earth!) and gazillion management morons who issue useless "audition reports". If half of those morons would be fired and the money directed to actual people who try to do at least something...

  16. Re:Gov program performs audit to ask for more mone by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> *One-man* government program writes his own audit to ask for more money.

    You laugh, but in ten years, if this went through as a US Government program I'd fully expect to see:

    * Undersecretary of NEO Defense
    * 2 Directors of NEO Defense (Homeland and Foreign)
    * 5 staff assistants for Undersecretary and Directors
    * 5 NEO Program Managers and a $20M technology budget
    * 2 NEO Project Managers to handle the implementation (and expected missed deadlines)
    * Full salaries, benefits and pensions for everyone, plus the original guy who has now retired
    * ...and still only one man actually doing any work.

  17. Re:Gov program performs audit to ask for more mone by Pikoro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You laugh at that, but with private corporations, sometimes things aren't much better. At one point in time, for about 4 months, I was the only person managing all the systems for around 250 branch banking offices in Japan for Citigroup. 1 person. This included the servers, diskless clients, and printers for them all. Across 3 data centers for load balancing and redundancy, so, counting spares, nearly 1000 servers. Stress level was increased until I quit.

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  18. Why not use lasers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll just put lasers on the heads of space sharks.
    They'll blast any NEO's to pieces and eat the debris just as they always have done.

  19. Good piece on this by Guy+From+V · · Score: 1

    Yesterday on the John Batchelor Show, the proposal by was for the Spaceguard to be formed as the Coast Guard for space, and for space to be governed by the space-equivalent of Maritime Law, which would fly in the face of current space treaties. The Spaceguard would also become sentinels and eyes out into space, having the funds and decision-making authority and hierarchy, as well as arms, like the USGS defending against asteroids and you-name-it. Until the mission into space becomes primarily for colonization rather than exploration, like the government states in public at least, then it will be regarded as unimportant. Also the fact that our governments are so risk-adverse as to allow for reasonable casualties and the necessary risk to be allowed, by the many who would gladly do so and who did so in the past commonly, is holding expansion into space back.

    I think it was the author of this book: http://www.amazon.com/Safe-Not...

    1. Re:Good piece on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yesterday on the John Batchelor Show, the proposal by was for the Spaceguard to be formed as the Coast Guard for space, and for space to be governed by the space-equivalent of Maritime Law, which would fly in the face of current space treaties. The Spaceguard would also become sentinels and eyes out into space, having the funds and decision-making authority and hierarchy, as well as arms, like the USGS defending against asteroids and you-name-it. Until the mission into space becomes primarily for colonization rather than exploration, like the government states in public at least, then it will be regarded as unimportant. Also the fact that our governments are so risk-adverse as to allow for reasonable casualties and the necessary risk to be allowed, by the many who would gladly do so and who did so in the past commonly, is holding expansion into space back.

      I think it was the author of this book: http://www.amazon.com/Safe-Not...

      I didn't even know the US Geological Survey had weapons!

  20. climate change anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like an efford to distract people from the REAL, IMMINENT and PERMANENT damage that is ALREADY UNDERWAY against which "world leaders" are doing absolutely nothing at all. Oh yeah, they "agreed" on eliminating fossil fuel by 2100 -- which is basically: we don't care now, hey grand-kids this is now your problem.

    1. Re:climate change anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that must be some real tasty green koolaid

  21. Would Make a Great Michael Moore Mocumentary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real NEO threat is Michael Moore bungee jumping off of the New River Bridge. The impact would wipe out up to 82% of the West Virginia population and fracture the North American Plate. Dead center. If we survive, we could be looking at a 10 mile wide Mississippi river.

  22. Good! by X10 · · Score: 0

    Earth and most of its inhabitants would definitely benefit from the removal of humans.

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  23. Gaining more visibility (Asteroid Day and B612) by Noksagt · · Score: 1

    This particular "existential threat" is gaining a lot more visibility and, slowly, more funding.

    Tomorrow marks the first Asteroid Day and it seems to be bringing a great deal of public attention to NEOs...at least amongst members of the public interested in science and museums and who are in metropolitan areas to see some of the events.

    The article was OK, and mentioned B612 but didn't really touch on how much of the NEO hunt is going to end up being done by NGOs, small observatories, and other organizations that aren't direct reports to the NEOO.

  24. It's already been built; we just need to find it by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Look for a big stone obelisk.
    There's a guy named Kirok who knows some folks that can get it working.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  25. Kickstarter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's blast 2034FC once and for all! Our Kickstarter will raise money for, construct, and launch a series of nuclear missiles to knock 2034FC out of its collision course with Earth once and for all. By pledging with us, you don't just get to be a part of saving multi-cellular life on Earth, you'll be eligible for these cool rewards!
    * $100 - "I saved Earth. What did you do?" T-shirt
    * $200 - As above, plus a poster showing a telescope view of the first detonation.
    * $300 - T-shirt plus a series of posters showing each detonation that you can wrap around your room as a panorama. Wow!
    * $500 - Invite to a local "We saved Earth!" party on the launch date!
    * $1000 - You get to pick the super-motivational song your local party plays while watching live video of the launch.
    * $5000 - A flight to the launch site to watch in-person! Holey moley!
    * $10000 - As above, but including box seats at the launch site!
    * $25000 - VIP access with exclusive T-shirts, complimentary drinks, and a keychain!
    * $100,000 - VIP access, plus we laser-engrave your name on the surface of the asteroid as it passes, forever immortalizing you as a savior of Earth!

    1. Re:Kickstarter! by magarity · · Score: 1

      $500 - Invite to a local "We saved Earth!" party on the launch date!

      Saved, past tense, on *launch* date? Isn't that a bit optimistic?

    2. Re:Kickstarter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that turns out to be untrue, I'm sure we'll get away with it.

  26. sad clarification by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    I was being sarcastic (and well... implicitly critising religion), equivalently to what I understand that the aforementioned anonymous cowards was doing.

    Apologies to any sensible and properly-understanding person for having written the current clarification, but I am unfortunately surrounded (better: pursued) by people with serious understanding problems. I usually avoid writing too sarcastic remarks, in order to also avoid having to write these sad clarifications. But this time the original text of the anonymous coward was so good that I wasn't able to refrain myself from writing that a bit more elegant continuation (although has quickly been proved to be too confusing for my "fans"...).

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    1. Re:sad clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was being sarcastic (and well... implicitly critising religion), equivalently to what I understand that the aforementioned anonymous cowards was doing.

      Apologies to any sensible and properly-understanding person for having written the current clarification, but I am unfortunately surrounded (better: pursued) by people with serious understanding problems. I usually avoid writing too sarcastic remarks, in order to also avoid having to write these sad clarifications. But this time the original text of the anonymous coward was so good that I wasn't able to refrain myself from writing that a bit more elegant continuation (although has quickly been proved to be too confusing for my "fans"...).

      No problem. Just add a tag at the end for the others.

    2. Re:sad clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..... /snark tag.

    3. Re:sad clarification by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice. I will do that the next time.

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  27. total what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    300 meters -> city goes bye bye
    10 000 meters -> dinosaurs disappear

    So "total annihilation" was not even near back then. The problem is that with our current monitoring system, we have absolutely no idea if we are still alive the next week or not. Obviously as we don't know which city might be destroyed, even the 300 meter rocks are troublesome and worth investing some money.

  28. Re:Gov program performs audit to ask for more mone by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    What ever happened to an the an anecdote is not data commenters?

  29. Re:Gov program performs audit to ask for more mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What surprises me most about the article is how inaccurate it is about attributing NEO discoveries.
    It looks like the lion's share have been found by Pan-STARRS since 2012, not Catalina.
    Pan-STARRS' code is F51:
    Catalina's code is 703.
    Here is Minor Planet Society's statistics: http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/YearlyBreakdown.html
    Here is a link to all of the codes (at the bottom of the page): http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/NEO/TheNEOPage.html

  30. Yes, we can move our planet by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    What do we do if the sun goes into red giant mode?"

    The answer by the way, is "not much".

    First of all, we have billions of years before that happens. Second of all, we can just move the Earth a little farther from the sun (if we're still living here or it has sufficient sentimental value). This, incidentally, relates to asteroids in that we can use the slingshot effect to transfer energy and momentum from asteroids to planet.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways