Slashdot Mirror


Meet the Makers of an Exotic (Partially) 3-D Printed Car (2 Videos)

Last month, in a story headlined 3D Printed Supercar Chassis Unveiled, we promised video interviews with builders Kevin and Brad "in the near future." Here they are. First, we have Kevin Czinger, Founder & CEO of Divergent Microfactories. He says the way we build cars is more important from an environmental standpoint than how we fuel them, and that the way we make cars now is a lot less efficient and a lot more expensive than it needs to be. Divergent's first demo vehicle, the Blade, is a tandem-seating 700 HP supercar its makers say does 0 - 60 in 2.5 seconds. Price? No word yet, but it's safe to assume "plenty" might be an accurate guess.

In the second video, Blade project lead Brad Balzer goes into detail about how, why, and where they use 3-D printing, and explains the modular nature of their car chassis design. He says they don't need to change many parts to go from ultra-sports car to pickup truck. He also says that while Divergent Microfactories is working on cars right now, their manufacturing system can be applied to many different industries. Indeed, their long-range goal is to help people build microfactories making many different kinds of products faster, more flexibly, and for less money than it takes to make similar manufactured items today.

Note: The transcript covers both videos and has a little 'bonus' material in it, too.

25 comments

  1. This is absurd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeh yeh a 700 HP "supercar", just what the world needs. A bunch of idiots is what they are!

    1. Re:This is absurd. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But it will provide valuable insights on how to 3D print 700 HP supercars for use on Mars!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to drive a super car that can also frame a truck. Hilarious.

  3. Back to MPAA P.S.A.s.... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    "You wouldn't steal a car, would you?"

  4. Stupid by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    He says the way we build cars is more important from an environmental standpoint than how we fuel them.

    Oh, okay. So let's fix the way we build cars but at the same time let's go backwards on how we fuel them.

    Why can't it be both? Because his company probably can't make electric cars.

    1. Re:Stupid by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      He was involved in an electric car venture a while back and it didn't go well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, turbine power or GTF out.

    3. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ, he didn't say you can't. Stop being a whiny bitch.

    4. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Stupid by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      He was involved in an electric car venture a while back and it didn't go well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Why aren't people like that convicted of fraud, theft and the rest, sent to jail and never allowed to run a business again?

      Rather than being held up as heroes on slashdot.

      I'm guessing they're being disruptive, which seems to excuse any sort of lawbreaking and skullduggery.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for _finally_ acknowledging this, however...
      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/06/24/2127217/3d-printed-supercar-chassis-unveiled

      Mysteriously, the comment pointing this out, has been stripped out of that article; all that's left are the "Funny" comments. (I checked with two different Browsers; nope, all that's left are the "Funny" comments. Hmmm... maybe _all_ the comments will be restored Real-Soon-Now. Or maybe this comment will disappear too.)

  5. finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wouldn't download a car

    Just you fucking wait

  6. So how much are they paying? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 2

    This is at least the third separate post on this in the last eight days, all solely because they used the buzzwords "3D printing". The fact it is 3D-printed adds absolutely nothing to the project, which is no lighter or better than a regular sports car of space frame construction.

    Which begs the question, what's the deal? How much is Slashdot being paid for these ads, because they're clearly not newsworthy...

    Since we're recycling stories now, I'm going to recycle my last comment on the same story:

    Frankly, this isn't terribly impressive. The Ariel Atom 500 will manage a 0-60 of 2.3 seconds or less from 200 *fewer* horsepower than the Blade, thanks to an even lighter weight of 1,213 pounds. And like the Blade, it has space frame construction, they just haven't wrapped some flimsy composite panels and a plexiglass windshield over it all. (But what did that add to the weight, really? I doubt it was 187 pounds, so the Atom is still lighter...)

    All the Atom really lacks is the "look-at-us" headline-grabbing use of 3D printing, which doesn't seem to be bringing terribly much of an advantage to the table here. And I guess, the styling that's right out of a kid's calendar. But really, what's revolutionary here? It's certainly not the construction or performance...

    Up next on Slashdot: A revolutionary new 3D-printed paperweight that holds down paper better than ever. It's going to revolutionize the paperweight industry!

    1. Re:So how much are they paying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you drive it at the track, you get peppered by gumballs and rocks thrown off from the guy in front. Basically, it's missing shin guards. Get a Spec Miata instead.

    2. Re:So how much are they paying? by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      Why do you insult us by insisting that we get paid for running stories about things that interest at least one Slashdot editor? If a story is a paid ad, it will say something like "AD" or "Sponsored Content."

      Also, what is not newsworthy to you may be newsworthy to someone else. You also seem to be missing the point of 3-D printing in this context: that the Blade is just a proof of concept. The idea is that other items can be made with similar manufacturing techniques; not purely 3-D printing but 3-D printing combined with other fab methods.

      Thank you for your input!

      - Rob

    3. Re:So how much are they paying? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because three stories on the exact same non-story in one week is excessive.

      99.999% of Slashdot readers will never even see one of these cars in real life, and that's on the unlikely assumption it ever even makes it into production. It's a safe bet that not a single Slashdot reader will ever actually drive one, let alone buy one.

      As for your other assertion, sorry, but no. This was represented in the first of three stories we saw this month as a vehicle which would be manufactured en masse using 3D printing, with a completely unrealistic production level of 10,000 cars per year. So no, the point is not that it's "just a proof of concept". And even if that was really the case, what, precisely does it bring that's new to 3D printing? As far as I can see, nothing.

      This is a totally unrealistic project that's just trying to build hype by using the latest buzzword. No more, no less. Once upon a time, it wouldn't have gotten a word on a geek site worth its salt. Now it gets three fawning articles in a week. It's a bit sad, really, and hence I vented about that. There are real stories out there which are far, far more worthy than this...

    4. Re:So how much are they paying? by Todd+Palin · · Score: 2

      Agreed. The car has some printed frame connectors which join the carbon fiber tubes that provide the strength of the frame. The carbon fiber tubes are NOT printed. When somebody figures out how to print a whole car I will be really impressed.

      There isn't anything about the drive train that is printed, so the figures about the car's performance have nothing to do with 3-D printing.

    5. Re:So how much are they paying? by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      You submitted those stories, right? Anyway, looking through your comment history, you love to be negative. You should thank us for giving you something else to complain about. Also, if I was in a bad mood I might point out that 1 article + 1 article = 2, and "fawning" is a bit over the top. But hey! You're the one who knows more than the rest of us, so I won't question anything you say.

      You are probablyright about the "10,000" cars thing being unrealistic, but let's look at it in context:

      "The initial plan is for DM to scale up to an annual production of 10,000 of these limited supercars, making them available to potential customers. This isn’t all though, as DM doesn’t merely plan on just being satisfied by manufacturing cars via this method. They plan on making the technology available to others as well."

      That 3DPrint.com article wasn't nearly as good as it would have been if you had written it, but you might want to be a little kinder to your inferiors. Czinger and Balzer have consistently talked about cars being just one type of manufacturing for which their process can be used. And it's not all about 3-D printing. Really.

      Okay - time to go upload some howto videos.

      Good night. Sleep tight. Don't let the 3-D printers bite!

      - R

         

    6. Re:So how much are they paying? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      something something protests too much something something

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. backwards? by daninaustin · · Score: 2

    Electric cars are still a niche market and will probably remain that way until batteries improve. http://www.science20.com/scien... I'd love to have an all electric car but they are too expensive and have limited range. Most of them are also too damn small (because the batteries still suck.)

  8. Pricing of the raw materials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd be curious what the base price for the materials used in the 3D printing process cost versus the cost of the materials used in a somewhat comparable super car are.

  9. old rules still apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Indeed, their long-range goal is to help people build microfactories making many different kinds of products faster, more flexibly, and for less money than it takes to make similar manufactured items today"

    Pick 2 and I am guessing less money isn't really one of them.

    Might work for some items I guess. Certainly not cars or anything significant. That microfactory will make engines and brakes and tires and seats ?!? If not you have to buy them in small quantities and get them delivered. Unless you can do this all by China Post that gets very expensive and not at all efficient. Not very fast either for that matter.

    I suppose i'll to read it and see why they think they have something.

    Still don't see much use for it. The only thing I have seen that would have been useful to 3-D print was a 1" cam lever on the legrests at work to make them work better. Would only cost $20 at Staples (or whoever I checked) to slightly improve the $18 piece :(

  10. Racist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word "exotic" is racist.

  11. Transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the transcript available on mobile? I don't want to watch a video on my phone.