Slashdot Mirror
Black Phosphorus Could Spur the Next Wave of Tiny Transistors
Zothecula writes: Researchers at McGill University and Université de Montréal have provided insight into another promising candidate that could help chip designers keep pace with Moore's Law: black phosphorus — a stable form of the element that can be separated into individual atomic layers, known as phosphorene (abstract). "Phosphorene has sparked growing interest because it overcomes many of the challenges of using graphene in electronics. Unlike graphene, which acts like a metal, black phosphorus is a natural semiconductor: it can be readily switched on and off." This new research found that "electrons are able to be pulled into a sheet of charge which is two-dimensional, even though they occupy a volume that is several atomic layers in thickness." It's an important step toward developing a manufacturing process for transistors made of this material.
It's almost 5. Too tired to think. I thought we were aiming at graphene. How does this compare?
"All the ease of use of graphene, plus the flammability of matches!"
Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
Hopefully this won't be like promising new battery tech that's always 5-10 years away. Assuming black phosphoros turns out to be a viable material, how long would it take until chips made with such transistors are actually mass-produced?
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
According to PTable.com elemental phosphorus has a melting point of 317 K, around 44 C. My laptop currently has multiple parts hotter than 40 C, so this will require a fair bit of work to get anything stable out of it.
Now that they can extract pure silicon 28 with a simple linear accelerator (which should have been obvious), it should be possible to use much larger dies without running into imperfection problems. That doesn't keep to Moore's Law, admittedly, but it does mean you can halve the space that double the transistors would take, since you're eliminating a lot of packaging. Over the space of the motherboard, it would more than work out, especially if they moved to wafer-scale integration. Want to know how many cores they put onto a wafer using regular dies? Instead of chopping the wafer up, you throw on interconnects Transputer-style.
Graphene is troublesome, yes, but there's lots of places you need regular conductors. If you replace copper interconnects and the gold links to the pins, you should be able to reduce the heat generated and therefore increase the speed you can run the chips. Graphene might also help with 3D chip technology, as you're going to be generating less heat between the layers. That would let you double the number of transistors per unit area occupied, even if not per unit area utilized.
Gallium Arsenide is still an option. If you can sort pure isotopes then it may be possible to overcome many of the limitations that have existed so far on the technology. It has been nasty to utilize, due to pollution, but we're well into the age where you can just convert the pollution into plasma and again separate out what's in it. It might be a little expensive, but the cost of cleanup will always be more and you can sell the results from the separation. It's much harder to sell polluted mud.
In the end, because people want compute power rather than a specific transistor count, Processor-in-Memory is always an option, simply move logic into RAM and avoid having to perform those functions by going through support chips, a bus and all the layers of a CPU in order to get carried out. DDR4 is nice and all that, but main memory is still a slow part of the system and the caches on the CPU are easily flooded due to code always expanding to the space available. There is also far too much work going on in managing memory. The current Linux memory manager is probably one of the best around. Take that and all the memory support chips, put it on an oversized ASIC and give it some cache. The POWER8 processor has 96 megabytes of L3 cache. I hate odd amounts and the memory logic won't be nearly as complex as the POWER8's, so let's increase it to 128 megabytes. Since the cache will be running at close to the speed of the CPU, exhaustion and stalling won't be nearly so common.
Actually, the best thing would be for the IMF (since it's not doing anything useful with its money) to buy millions of POWER8 and MIPS64 processors, offering them for free to geeks individually on on daughter boards that can be plugged in as expansion cards. At worst, it would make life very interesting.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
http://sparkbangbuzz.com/memri...
See subject: Are going to revolutionize computing for performance - mark my words.
* It only makes sense...
(IF it's there, & the "manufacturing 'powers that be'" hit a wall, like they're going to with silicon (gallium arsenide = better/faster switching state 0-1 but poisonous as hell byproduct of aluminum/bauxite manufacture) & need that "competitive edge"? It'll happen - they'll MAKE it happen, cost-effectively, somehow...)
Copper doesn't move enough fast enough (no matter HOW many traces & lanes you put into play since it only uses the SURFACE of that trace, not its entire volume like optics do) - fiber optics WILL take care of that & take its place too. Intel's on the RIGHT TRACK with their stuff there...
APK
P.S.=> It's going to be interesting seeing these 'exotic materials' put into play, just for seeing performance + efficiency purposes alone (& we THINK we have fast machines today? Ha!) imo - I wager by the time I'm 70 (20 yrs. away), it'll be commonplace to have all that going for the modern computing equipment of tomorrow.
Heh - we'll be talking about silicon as if it were glass tubes vs. integrated circuits, for example, I imagine!
I also think memristors are another "the future is now" just WAITING to happen as well... we'll see! apk
Black Phosphorus. Sounds like a good name for a rock band.
I'm very sorry, but Larry Niven lied to us in Ringworld.
Electrical superconductors are not heat superconductors; in fact, as far as I know, nobody has demonstrated true heat superconductivity (all points of the material remain at the same temperature, supporting infinite heat-transfer rates). I found a speculative paper about it from 2012, but it's only speculation.
We're working our way back to the 2D electron gas work done in the decades before graphene.
Phosphorene is not a true 2D material (this is a "few layer" material, it's not a perfect analog of graphene), yet electrons in phosphorene can be made to behave as if they're in perfect 2D confinement. This is not the only material you can do this with. There are many ways of creating a 2D electron gas, with a wide range of applications and properties. There are some old hands at making these structures in the nano community, don't be surprised if in the next couple of years much is made in the academic literature of GaAs and GaN (again).