Slashdot Mirror


For Microsoft, Windows 10 Charity Begins At Home

theodp writes: "We're investing $10 million in organizations that are upgrading the world," Microsoft announced on in its new Upgrade Your World website, which was created in conjunction with the Windows 10 launch. "We've identified nine global nonprofits, and we'd like your help choosing the 10th." The missions of the selected nonprofits include fighting global poverty, preventing children living with HIV from needlessly dying, increasing access to quality education for children in the developing world, conserving the lands and waters on which all life depends, and ensuring that all kindergartners learn 'computer science.' To paraphrase Sesame Street, can you guess which cause is not like the others? If you guessed Code.org, which wants CS made a "core" K-12 subject in U.S. schools, you're right! Coincidentally, Code.org's biggest donors include Microsoft ($3M+), Ballmer Family Giving ($3M+), and Bill Gates ($1M+). And Code.org CEO Hadi Partovi, who once reported to Satya Nadella, is coincidentally a sometimes jogging partner of Steve Ballmer, as well as the next-door neighbor of Microsoft General Counsel and Code.org Board member Brad Smith, whose FWD.us bio notes is responsible for Microsoft's philanthropic work. Code.org emerged on the scene shortly after Smith suggested that action on Microsoft's 'two-pronged' National Talent Strategy to increase K-12 CS education and the number of H-1B visas could be galvanized by 'producing a crisis'.

74 comments

  1. kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " ...conserving the lands and waters on which all life depends, and ensuring that all kindergartners learn 'computer science.' "

    How about we start teaching our kindergartners "critical thinking" instead?

    1. Re:kindergartners? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 2

      What kindergartners need to know is that windows is a turd of an OS . They need to know that there are lots of good options out there.. They need to know that when they grow up the dying dinosaur called Microsoft will be at its worst most unethical behavior to survive by hook or by crook

    2. Re: kindergartners? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 3, Informative

      They can't even do basic addition without using their fingers. And yet you want to teach them critical thinking? Idiot.

      In the US, today, kindergarten is what 1st grade used to be. The emphasis is on reading and math. They aren't allowed to count on their fingers after pre-school. That said, the structures in the brain that allow for critical thinking aren't formed until around the age of 7, so it isn't really useful to attempt to teach critical thinking skills, except at a most rudimentary level, in kindergarten.

    3. Re:kindergartners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they care very deeply about operating systems and business ethics ;-)

    4. Re: kindergartners? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      You really don't know what you are talking about, so please stop. Yes it's worth while to start in Kindergarten. You want to stimulate the mind.

    5. Re:kindergartners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if they can't edit xorg.conf by hand before grade 1, our education system has failed irreversibly.

    6. Re:kindergartners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait till you see GNU/Linux. It's more than just a turd. It's an entire toilet filled with shit, piss, vomit, blood, and chunks of unidentifiable organic matter.

    7. Re: kindergartners? by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're referring to the age of seven, he is exactly right. It's dependent upon the brain's development. Stimulating the mind is a different matter than teaching critical thinking.

    8. Re:kindergartners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >How about we start teaching our kindergartners "critical thinking" instead?

      The Conservatives would never go for that. Well-meaning people who can think do not vote for Republicans, and the party needs the stupid vote in addition to the greedy vote to win.

    9. Re:kindergartners? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0

      " ...conserving the lands and waters on which all life depends, and ensuring that all kindergartners learn 'computer science.' "

      How about we start teaching our kindergartners "critical thinking" instead?

      Republicans and Conservatives would hate that.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    10. Re:kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 2

      Government would hate that.

      FTFY

      ps - why the cap on "conservatives"? RU1?

    11. Re:kindergartners? by mlts · · Score: 1

      Sendmail.cf is extra credit these days?

    12. Re:kindergartners? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Piaget, also, would hate that. Because it's slightly impossible. Morons, all of you!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    13. Re: kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 2

      That said, the structures in the brain that allow for critical thinking aren't formed until around the age of 7, so it isn't really useful to attempt to teach critical thinking skills, except at a most rudimentary level, in kindergarten.

      Yeah, and the structures in the brain that allow for learning computer science aren't formed either. If you're going to teach something that that young brains can't handle, I'll choose critical thinking over computer science *every* *fucking* *time*.

    14. Re:kindergartners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kindergartners need to know is that windows is a turd of an OS .

      No, what they really need to know is that systemd will ruin their adult lives.

    15. Re: kindergartners? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      That said, the structures in the brain that allow for critical thinking aren't formed until around the age of 7, so it isn't really useful to attempt to teach critical thinking skills, except at a most rudimentary level, in kindergarten.

      Yeah, and the structures in the brain that allow for learning computer science aren't formed either.

      I would concur with that, at least structured programming. OTOH, young people do quite well with Logos and derivatives there of.

    16. Re:kindergartners? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Government would hate that.

      FTFY

      ps - why the cap on "conservatives"? RU1?

      Nope not R or C, but I live in SE Virginia and seem them all around... Fucking over the country as a whole and specifically anyone who's not rich, white, and heterosexual (all of which which I actually am) - because "'muh Freedoms!" and "let's leave things to the scientists" (but only those that agree with us, otherwise science and scientists are bad/wrong). Fucking fucktards.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    17. Re: kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 1

      I would concur with that, at least structured programming. OTOH, young people do quite well with Logos and derivatives there of.

      Apparently they do much better with tablets than legos or building blocks. Swiping is more important than constructing these days.

    18. Re: kindergartners? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      I would concur with that, at least structured programming. OTOH, young people do quite well with Logos and derivatives there of.

      Apparently they do much better with tablets than legos or building blocks. Swiping is more important than constructing these days.

      I was referring to the various programming languages for young children that have been around since the late 60s.

      As for swiping versus building things, it's too soon to tell how that will developmentally manifest itself in the adult population. "Building things" is prevalent in many cultures and is probably an inherited trait in the human genome. Even other primates exhibit the trait to some degree. So, substituting tablets will be an interesting social experiment.

    19. Re:kindergartners? by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Critical thinking is a pseudo-science and pseudo-didactics invented by anti-scientistic intellectuals and shabby pedagogues who tend to vigorously oppose to any solid training in math and logic.

      At least that's my impression after having been exposed to a research group in argumentation, critical thinking and "informal logic" at our university for the past five years or so. (I'm a postdoc in philosophy.) Please don't teach it anywhere. Teach mathematics and classical statistics instead.

    20. Re: kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the various programming languages for young children that have been around since the late 60s.

      ORLY?

      What programming languages for young children were around in the late 60s? Name ONE. Name ONE kindergarten or primary school that was teaching ANY programming language to young children the late 60s. Name ONE high school that was teaching ANY programming language to students in the late 60s. Name ONE UNIVERSITY teaching undergrads a programming language in the late 60s.

      You either have a very different definition of "young children" than the rest of the world, or you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

    21. Re: kindergartners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One example is: Smalltalk

      Smalltalk is an object-oriented, dynamically typed, reflective programming language. Smalltalk was created as the language to underpin the "new world" of computing exemplified by "human–computer symbiosis."[1] It was designed and created in part for educational use, more so for constructionist learning, at the Learning Research Group (LRG) of Xerox PARC...

      Development began in 1969.

      Since you're an asshole with poor reading comprehension: being around since the late 60s does not mean it's been in use since the late 60s.

    22. Re:kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 1

      At least that's my impression after having been exposed to a research group in argumentation, critical thinking and "informal logic" at our university for the past five years or so.

      That's a long time to be exposed to a research group. Did they drip water on your forehead for the entire 5 years?

      I'm a postdoc in philosophy.

      Of course you are.

      Only an over educated ivory tower egghead would disparage the SKILL (not science) of critical thinking. Go back to sucking the pseudo-dicks of your pseudo-thesis pseudo-committee and leave the real world to the rest of us.

      If you don't get a job in academia, I look forward to giving you some change at a popular intersection where you're holding up a sign begging for food.

      Cheers!

    23. Re:kindergartners? by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      That's a long time to be exposed to a research group. Did they drip water on your forehead for the entire 5 years?

      No, but they said things that were almost as stupid as your post.

      Only an over educated ivory tower

      Go fuck yourself, little asshole.

    24. Re: kindergartners? by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Shut up you piece of shit!

    25. Re: kindergartners? by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Quite some smartass we have there, haven't we.

    26. Re:kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 1

      No, but they said things that were almost as stupid as your post.

      Wait...I thought you said the research group you were exposed to positively shaped your thinking. Did you benefit from the research group's didactics or were your professors stupid as well?

      Perhaps you should re-take Logic 101 (that is if you took it to begin with).

      Go fuck yourself, little asshole.

      For a Philosophy PhD candidate, you sure have some weak logic skills. Care to make an actual argument?

    27. Re: kindergartners? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the various programming languages for young children that have been around since the late 60s.

      ORLY?

      What programming languages for young children were around in the late 60s? Name ONE. Name ONE kindergarten or primary school that was teaching ANY programming language to young children the late 60s. Name ONE high school that was teaching ANY programming language to students in the late 60s. Name ONE UNIVERSITY teaching undergrads a programming language in the late 60s.

      You either have a very different definition of "young children" than the rest of the world, or you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

      I believe that Logo was invented by MIT in 1967. With it, a child could give it simple commands to move a cursor to draw various shapes. I think it was called turtle graphics or something like that. It was demoed with five year olds drawing simple geometric shapes and older children producing Spirograph type drawings (although still pretty simple and crude by today's standards). By the mid-to late 70s, it was available on the Apple II, C64 and other microcomputers.

      Being available for use and actually being used are obviously two different things. However, it definitely could be used if somebody chose to do so beyond MIT.

    28. Re:kindergartners? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Government would hate that.

      FTFY

      ps - why the cap on "conservatives"? RU1?

      Nope not R or C, but I live in SE Virginia and seem them all around... Fucking over the country as a whole and specifically anyone who's not rich, white, and heterosexual (all of which which I actually am) - because "'muh Freedoms!" and "let's leave things to the scientists" (but only those that agree with us, otherwise science and scientists are bad/wrong). Fucking fucktards.

      I know, right? If only SE VA would implement more liberal policies. Worked great in Detroit - err Baltimore, MD., err I mean Chicago.. NVM

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    29. Re: kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 1

      Being available for use and actually being used are obviously two different things. However, it definitely could be used if somebody chose to do so beyond MIT.

      You've completely missed the point. It's not about when a teaching tool was invented, it's about when it was utilized in front of what age group.

    30. Re: kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 1

      Development began in 1969.

      Great! When has it been taught in schools to young people?

      Since you're an asshole with poor reading comprehension: being around since the late 60s does not mean it's been in use since the late 60s.

      Yeah, that's kinda my point. Thanks for reiterating it.

    31. Re:kindergartners? by SMTB1963 · · Score: 1

      Critical thinking is a pseudo-science and pseudo-didactics invented by anti-scientistic intellectuals and shabby pedagogues who tend to vigorously oppose to any solid training in math and logic.

      What the fuck does that mean? If you don't want to be written off as a crank, you'd better explain yourself.

    32. Re: kindergartners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, because I got started programming on a VIC-20 when I was 5 years old. Maybe the kids today are really stupid, but it wasn't always like that.

    33. Re: kindergartners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misread the guy's original comment, and your solution is to double down on the aggression and idiocy? GG, fuckboy.

    34. Re:kindergartners? by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      No, but they said things that were almost as stupid as your post.

      Wait...I thought you said the research group you were exposed to positively shaped your thinking. Did you benefit from the research group's didactics or were your professors stupid as well?

      I've said the opposite. So much for your reading skills. And yes, unfortunately there are fairly stupid professors in philosophy, but they are nowhere near as stupid as the leading scholars in argumentation theory and critical thinking whom I've met.

      Perhaps you should re-take Logic 101 (that is if you took it to begin with).

      I am a logician.

      Go fuck yourself, little asshole.

      For a Philosophy PhD candidate, you sure have some weak logic skills. Care to make an actual argument?

      I did my Ph.D. ten years ago and work as a senior researcher at a research facility since then. Sure I can make actual arguments, but as Mark Twain said so eloquently:

      Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

    35. Re:kindergartners? by DiehardIndependent · · Score: 1

      I've said the opposite. So much for your reading skills.

      ...mmm, so you spent the past five years or so listening to stupid scholars in argumentation theory and critical thinking? Good for you. Excuse me for not wanting to believe anyone would waste that much of their time listening to people they detest.

      I am a logician.

      That explains your "Go fuck yourself, little asshole" comment quite nicely, doesn't it?

      Sure I can make actual arguments, but as Mark Twain said so eloquently:

      Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

      Yet here you are on slashdot telling little assholes to go fuck themselves. Your employer is really getting their money's worth.

      What is it you do again? Besides taking up useful space? Have you ever done anything more useful than writing bullshit like you've done here? Get a REAL job, Poindexter.

    36. Re: kindergartners? by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      Shut up you piece of shit!

      LOL! You're a postdoc in philosophy, right? Nice!

  2. other charitable causes by nimbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    Checking the site there are other causes listed that are far more important in my opinion:

    Nokia Anonymous provides psychological counseling and moral support to victims who have spent billions on a cellular phone, only to spend billions more in an endless cycle of abuse.

    the Explorer education program Teaches its members to become acid compliant, and learn to quit bad behaviors like ActiveX and browser preference stealing. Ultimately the explorer programs goal is to help its mentally challenged students to learn simple things like HTML5 and even simple forms.

    The Steve Ballmer Institute: No one knows what condition afflicts steve ballmer. Hes a man once known to hurl furniture in fits of paranoid delusion, only to emerge days later caked in sweat and howling a chant of 'developers' over and over, in a schitzophrenic episode. The Ballmer institute seeks to heal by studying and, in time, formulating a treatment for this rare and profoundly sad disease.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:other charitable causes by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      The Steve Ballmer Institute: No one knows what condition afflicts steve ballmer. Hes a man once known to hurl furniture in fits of paranoid delusion, only to emerge days later caked in sweat and howling a chant of 'developers' over and over, in a schitzophrenic episode. The Ballmer institute seeks to heal by studying and, in time, formulating a treatment for this rare and profoundly sad disease.

      It's a nice idea, but their suggested treatment is just repeating the word "doctors" ad nauseum.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:other charitable causes by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Steve Ballmer Institute: No one knows what condition afflicts steve ballmer. Hes a man once known to hurl furniture in fits of paranoid delusion, only to emerge days later caked in sweat and howling a chant of 'developers' over and over, in a schitzophrenic episode. The Ballmer institute seeks to heal by studying and, in time, formulating a treatment for this rare and profoundly sad disease.

      It's a nice idea, but their suggested treatment is just repeating the word "doctors" ad nauseum.

      Or stop using Windows. That seems to help calm my desire to hurl furniture a LOT.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  3. sco? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

    novell?

  4. Producing a crisis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Microsoft wants to promote Windows 10 by 'producing' an HIV epidemic among our nation's kindergartners. Typical Micro$haft.

  5. The bigger question is who is the OP? by BuypolarBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And how do his summaries keep getting through?

    This is the second incomprehensible summary accepted from this user this week about Microsoft and Code.org. The first was "Well-Played: Microsoft Parlayed NSF Video 'Remake' into National CS K-12 Crisis" ( http://developers.slashdot.org... ) and now this.

    Apparently he's been at this for a while, too. Here's a Gawker article about the mystery of TheoDP from 2006: http://gawker.com/178280/the-m...

    Does he have dirt on the Slashdot editors?

    1. Re:The bigger question is who is the OP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also found that gawker article hard to understand.

    2. Re:The bigger question is who is the OP? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i think it's obvious to anyone paying attention that programming should be introduced to children

      finland knows what's up

      https://www.reddit.com/r/progr...

      we're talking about things like scratch: https://scratch.mit.edu/

      if/ then, while loops. simple stuff, not even bubble sort, not complicated algorithms

      but then you see this in the summary:

      action on Microsoft's 'two-pronged' National Talent Strategy to increase K-12 CS education and the number of H-1B visas could be galvanized by 'producing a crisis'.

      so there's actually morons out there who believe teaching kids how to animate crude cartoons is some sort of plot to destroy the american programmer's salaries and work options

      or even if they don't like microsoft and hate the H-1B visa plan... therefore they should oppose microsoft supporting an effort to expose more children to the rudimentary basics of programming?

      because teaching kids trumpet puts professional jazz musicians out of work

      because teaching kids algebra threatens theoretical physicist's jobs

      because if you don't like microsoft, children should suffer

      why does slashdot continuously submit this douchebag crackpot theodp?

      slashdot: please squelch this wackjob

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:The bigger question is who is the OP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so there's actually morons out there who believe teaching kids how to animate crude cartoons is some sort of plot to destroy the american programmer's salaries and work options

      This is slashdot's target audience. Insecure over the hill programmers whose skills haven't kept up with the times...

    4. Re:The bigger question is who is the OP? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      seriously, slashdot is beginning to reek of depends undergarments

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:The bigger question is who is the OP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then perhaps you should move onto a different site. SoylentNews, perhaps.

    6. Re:The bigger question is who is the OP? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      perhaps

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  6. Fuck you Microsoft, your charity = brainwash & by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you Microsoft, your charity is not charity but brainwash and/or PR stunt. All you do is suck people and organisations into your sick and twisted world of shiny but shitty software.
    Fuck you Bill Gates and every asshole, who works in or for Microsoft!

  7. Re:Fuck you Microsoft, your charity = brainwash &a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, what a complete bastard! Spending billions of his own money to improve the health and welfare of kids everywhere.

  8. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's pointing out that rich people know other rich people and they sometimes work together for their own benefit? Oh no!

  9. Choose charities carefully by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    Considering that some "charities" are more fund raising non-profit businesses, with little going to the claimed recipients, I believe that MS giving money to charities that they are familiar with and have a track record of doing what they claim to do a wise move. If you doubt this, do a search for charity fraud. You'll be surprised at what turns up. It's best to donate locally. That's what MS is doing.

  10. Re:A very politically correct set of charities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the poor men are getting the shaft with all this equality nonsense. Women should just be thankful that we granted them human rights in the first place. They can show their thanks by making me a decent sandwich.

    FUCK THE MATRIARCHY!

  11. Leave it to Slashdot by Evil_MrM · · Score: 1

    Leave it to Slashdot to make Microsoft giving 10 million dollars to charity seem like a bad thing...

    1. Re:Leave it to Slashdot by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Leave it to Slashdot to make Microsoft giving 10 million dollars to charity seem like a bad thing...

      Look. Charities have a lot things to deal with already, having to use Windows shouldn't be one of them.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Leave it to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right! Stop donating Sharpoint to hapless nonprofits! It's simply evil!

    3. Re:Leave it to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course.

      They release code as open source and license associated patents under the community promise.
      They react to user feedback on the XBox by removing Kinect and Internet requirements as well as providing backwards compatibility.
      They base their decision to remove the start menu on user feedback and then users complain because they didn't provide feedback so this time Microsoft engages a more explicit program to solicit feedback during development.
      They provide free-of-charge upgrades to users of their operating systems released in the past 5 years.
      They reduce the system requirements of their desktop OS to less than what they produced nearly a decade ago with Vista.
      They abandon support of their proprietary closed source plugin system.
      They ditch proprietary extensions in favor of developing for open standards.
      They develop their products for platforms other than just Windows (even Android which is Linux!)

      And yet *still* the old fogies of this site act like it is the 90s as if Microsoft is the same company operating in the same world run by the same people. There is a desperation to come up with a conspiracy theory about how everything they do just seems to be a good thing but actually it is all part of some evil Microsoft plot.

    4. Re:Leave it to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. Microsoft's software is proprietary software. Microsoft is retaining full right to control their own software and forbidding these charities to modify and share Microsoft's software. Microsoft's "charitable" donation of their proprietary software is nothing more than digital colonialism where Microsoft remains to be the master and the charities choose a life of imposition by Microsoft.

  12. Re:Fuck you Microsoft, your charity = brainwash &a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pretty obvious that you've gone insane. Maybe lay off of Slashderp for a while.

  13. If charity starts at home, will M$ hire US Citizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    or will they continue hiring L1 visa holders bringing them to Redmond from their Vancouver office, replacing US Citizens with cheap labor?

  14. Re:A very politically correct set of charities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a serious misogyny problem at Slashdot. Some of these morons are even letting their hatred of women drive them into the arms of the evil Conservatives.

  15. Re:A very politically correct set of charities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're seriously caught up in the dudebro bubble. No, women aren't going to wait for your permission to take equal rights. No one who derps out "SJWs" in reference to civilized people can be taken seriously. You're all dead-enders.

  16. Game: How much crap fits in a summary! by s.petry · · Score: 2

    I didn't bother reading anything but the summary, because the summary takes every possible approach attempting paint criminals and scum as good for society. MS is lobbying for he wrong things for the sole reason of making more money. The 10mil is peanuts compared to companies which make a lot less profits without screwing over neighbors for "moh money"

    Surely Gates, Balmer and even Microsoft could pay back society.. but this is not a a payment at all.. it is business as usual.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Game: How much crap fits in a summary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't bother reading anything but the summary, because the summary takes every possible approach attempting paint criminals and scum as good for society.

      But they aren't "criminals", you are extrapolating to falsehoods to suit your agenda.

      MS is lobbying for he wrong things for the sole reason of making more money.

      A for-profit company is trying to make money?! Surely not! What would its shareholders think?!

      The 10mil is peanuts compared to companies which make a lot less profits without screwing over neighbors for "moh money"

      You can hate them because they make money or because they make proprietary software but ultimately they are doing something to benefit underprivileged communities. And yes I'm sure you will say they are better off with nothing and should just wait until a different solution presents itself and I'm also fairly sure you see no problem with that.

  17. Ho hum, another day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another anti- Code.org/FWD.us/CS K-12 attack piece from Theodp, who has succeeded in turning slashdot.org into his own political blog.

  18. Really? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I've given to MS 'Charity' (their shareholders) each time I bought a computer the last 25 years, if I wanted or not.

  19. Not another one! by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

    For goodness sake, how many of theodp's anti-CS education opinion pieces is slashdot going to post? This is getting absurd!

    --
    "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  20. Re:A very politically correct set of charities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We wouldn't have a misogyny problem if women just stayed the hell out of the traditional men's careers and activities and maybe just stayed home. Men's rights are being eroded at a ridiculous pace.

    And THEY WON'T FUCK ME

  21. Re:Fuck you Microsoft, your charity = brainwash &a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, what a complete bastard! Spending billions of his own money to improve the health and welfare of kids everywhere.

    No no, you need to understand that this is actually all a big Microsoft conspiracy to get more money in conjunction with first world governments and big pharma! We should rally against improving the health and welfare of people unless it is done by people that we cannot come up with any conspiracy theory about.

    I'm going to add that I am being sarcastic because this is exactly what a lot of the detractors actually believe.

  22. But it's Windows 10!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Windows 10. Are MS trying to stop these organisations from doing anything productive then?

  23. There is just a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows costs not only license fees. The costs caused by windows are still there, when MS donates the licenses and could be avoided with a stable software.