Slashdot Mirror


The French Scrabble Champ Does Not Speak French

HughPickens.com writes: On July 20, Nigel Richards won the French-language world Scrabble championship. Richards does not speak a word of French. "He doesn't speak French at all, he just learnt the words," says Liz Fagerlund. "He won't know what they mean, wouldn't be able to carry out a conversation in French I wouldn't think." Richards reportedly memorized an entire French dictionary in the two months leading up to the competition. For living-room players, Scrabble is a test of vocabularies but for world-class players, it's about cold memorization and mathematical probabilities which is why top player are often computer programmers or mathematicians, not poets or novelists. Think of the dictionary as a giant rulebook of valid text strings not as a compendium of the beauty and complexity of the English language. A good competitive player will have memorized a sizeable chunk of the 83,667 words that are two letters to eight letters long. Great players will know a lot of the 29,150 nine-letter words as well.

To the uninitiated, a scrabble game played by top players looks like they had played in Martian. Here's a taste: In a single game in last year's Nationals, Richards played the following words: zarf (a metal holder for a coffee cup), waddy (to strike with a thick club), hulloed (to hallo, to shout), sajous (a capuchin, a monkey), qi (the vital force in Chinese thought), flyboats (a small, fast boat), trigo (wheat) and threaper (one that threaps, disputes). Richards has a photographic memory and is known for his uncanny gift for constructing impossible words by stringing his letters through tiles already on the board. "He is probably the best Scrabble player in the world at this point," says John D. Williams, Jr.. "He's got the entire dictionary memorized. He's pretty much a Scrabble machine, if such a thing exists." So, really, how does he do it? As Richards said in an interview posted on YouTube, "I'm not sure there is a secret. It's just a matter of learning the words." All 178,691 of them.

113 comments

  1. Is this a surprise? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Scrabble is only a game about words at fairly low levels of play. If you have two otherwise unprepared people stuck in a room with nothing but scrabble for amusement, yes, the one with the better vocabulary likely has better options. Outside of the amateurs, though, memorization of the approved dictionary(starting with words chosen for good point values, the ability to dispose of letters that are usually tricky to get rid of, and other helpful features; but ideally progressing to all of them) supplants knowledge of the language and the remaining challenge is board control and optimizing the conversion of tiles into points over the course of the game.

    There would certainly be additional prep time, even for the unusual characters who are really good at this; but the skills that the game demands for high level play should be transferable to any language(or even a nonsense dictionary) that works reasonably well with representation by a relatively small alphabet.

    1. Re:Is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact you can win at Scrabble by knowing all the words isn't a surprise - that's what being "the one with the better vocabulary" means, so in fact it generalizes to all levels of play. Even beginners play words they don't know the literal meaning of.

      The fact that someone can learn the majority of French words in two months without being able to speak French might be deemed more surprising.

    2. Re:Is this a surprise? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not knowing the meaning and not knowing the vocabulary in a normal way, obviously give him an advantage. We can understand it this way, if you don't know the language, the word which will come to your mind will come to it only because the reminding process is initiated by the set of letters you have on your tray. On another hand, the native speaker of the language will be reminded words on another basis. Yes, the letters on the tray will have a role, however, he will naturally screen words and extract a subset of words he uses or is likely to use, which will probably will elimitate a lot of good candidates.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    3. Re:Is this a surprise? by ebh · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those of us who play tournament Scrabble are only mildly surprised that Nigel learned all the words in that short a period of time. But what makes Nigel the best is much more than knowing all the words. There are a few dozen players, and a number of computer players, who can credibly make that claim.

      Nobody has Nigel's combination of word knowledge, board vision, and ability to calculate probabilities.

    4. Re: Is this a surprise? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's not really 'word knowledge' in the normal sense. It's memorization of the select collection of letter patterns sanctioned by a rule making committee.

      That is in no sense a form of knowledge. It's why a lot of us consider 'competitive Scrabble' a form of drudgery.

    5. Re: Is this a surprise? by ebh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's the trap of thinking of Scrabble as a word game. It's not. It's a maths and probability game, with words as the playing pieces.

    6. Re:Is this a surprise? by Milharis · · Score: 1

      He also said it gave him an advantage because he doesn't think of "nice, probable sounding" words that do not actually exists. Related to this, he can challenge such words because he knows they are not on the list he has learnt when they might appear reasonable to a native player.
      I imagine someone from a language totally unrelated to French would have this advantage even more amplified.

    7. Re:Is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find interesting is a majority of people interpret someones grammar skills as an overall indicator of a persons knowledge in all fields or at least the filed they are representing themselves in. Almost as much as people consider a person with a clean hair cut and a nice pressed suit trustworthy. If this person has good grammar, he looks nice, he must know what he is talking about.

      Here you have a guy that can memorize and spell most words in any dictionary, using grammar Nazi logic, this is the smartest person in the world in all fields and he has no idea what 99% of those words actually mean.

  2. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does it hurt to have the definitions there? If not then stfu. And it helps by saving time used to look up them, so again, stfu.

  3. Words + Attitude = Wins by drjoe1e6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's not just his uncanny command of the dictionary (or dictionaries!) that makes Nigel a champion. He has an incredibly calm demeanor across the board. He is unflappable, regardless of tile draws or opponent's plays. The ability to focus on the next play and the strategic situation, without distraction, is critical to winning in a long tournament.

    --
    Lose = not win ...... Loose = not tight
    1. Re:Words + Attitude = Wins by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      He has an incredibly calm demeanor across the board. He is unflappable, regardless of tile draws or opponent's plays. The ability to focus on the next play and the strategic situation, without distraction, is critical to winning in a long tournament.

      ...until the technical trick is identified.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Words + Attitude = Wins by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      It's not just his uncanny command of the dictionary (or dictionaries!) that makes Nigel a champion. He has an incredibly calm demeanor across the board. He is unflappable, regardless of tile draws or opponent's plays. The ability to focus on the next play and the strategic situation, without distraction, is critical to winning in a long tournament.

      Actually, I think in a scrabble competition, they don't rely on luck of the draw - the video basically showed all the competitors with a set of tiles pre-arranged on a rack (presumably in a fixed order), a scrabble board, and a scoring pad. Each competitor takes tiles from the rack, in order, then places them on the board and scoring himself.

      There's no competitor, and no random drawing - this is to eliminate "luck" from the actual competition so it's down to skill. Not sure if they can peek at upcoming tiles for strategy.

      But it's a pure skill based competition - every presumably gets the same tiles in the same order, and they play the tiles as how they wish per the rules. There's no luck element, so you can't blame bad tiles for your loss. It's down to you, your current rack of tiles, and your ability to plan ahead to score the letter/word bonuses. And your ability to form words. There may be a time limit as well.

      Apparently, Words with Friends changes the scoring of some letters to make it more exciting, so WwF is not a pure Scrabble clone. And because the bonuses are different and scoring is different, a good scrabble player is not necessarily a good WwF player because the strategies involving bonuses and word positions and value are different.

  4. He "learnt" the words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...and the result was a pretty good edumacation.

    1. Re:He "learnt" the words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, US English isn't the only dialect in the world. Get out of your Mom's basement sometime.

    2. Re:He "learnt" the words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not dialect. It's a person making a grammatical mistake and other people mindlessly repeating it.

    3. Re:He "learnt" the words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is "mom's basement" a euphemism?

    4. Re:He "learnt" the words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not dialect. It's a person making a grammatical mistake and other people mindlessly repeating it.

      "learnt" isn't a grammatical mistake. It's valid and common British English and used regularly outside of the U.S.

    5. Re:He "learnt" the words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's not dialect. It's a person making a grammatical mistake and other people mindlessly repeating it.

      That word "grammar" doesn't mean what you think it does.

    6. Re:He "learnt" the words by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2

      Tournament Scrabble player here (much worse than Nigel, lol): LEARNT is a valid scrabble word string.

    7. Re:He "learnt" the words by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      + spelt, dealt, dreamt, leapt and some more I can't think of.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    8. Re:He "learnt" the words by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      LEARNT is a valid scrabble word string.

      Is CROMULENT a valid Scrabble word string? If not, they need to embiggen the dictionary.

    9. Re:He "learnt" the words by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      That's not dialect.

      Yes, it most certainly is. From the Oxford Dictionaries site:

      These are alternative forms of the past tense and past participle of the verb learn. Both are acceptable, but learned is often used in both British English and American English, while learnt is much more common in British English than in American English.

  5. weak summary. by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

    First, there has never been any evidence of photographic memory. Self reporting photographic memory is akin to him self reporting having a 24" penis.

    Second, Qi is a commonly played word even in novice games, as it is one of the few Q words that can be played without a U.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:weak summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Self reporting photographic memory is akin to him self reporting having a 24" penis.

      As the proud owner of a 29" penis, I'd say that 24" is a bit short.
      My porn access logs prove that my penis can stand at most 29 seconds erected.
      But, granted, I don't have a photographic memory.

    2. Re:weak summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First, there has never been any evidence of photographic memory. Self reporting photographic memory is akin to him self reporting having a 24" penis. .

      I, for one, demand that a study be conducted about the correlation/causation of photographic memory with absurdly large penis size.

    3. Re:weak summary. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If you really had one of those, you wouldn't be spending time on Slashdot.

    4. Re:weak summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But of course we who play tournament scrabble know that it is not just his knowledge of the words that make Nigel so great but also his 24" penis.

  6. Re: Seriously? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    An article for non-techies will usually explain briefly what an OS is and what Linux is.

  7. ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox oy by kaur · · Score: 1

    I am Estonian; I play English scrabble; many words I use have no meaning to me but I know they exist within the context of the game.

    Every (semi-decent) player knows all two-letter combinations that are essential for putting longer words in parallel.
    Give them a look: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki...
    How many of those would you consider as a "word"?

  8. New rule by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, we've got a programmer in our group that we played with one night. After his second questionable 2 letter word we added a rule (democratically voted on and adopted) that you must be able to define your word and use it properly in a sentence if anyone asks.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:New rule by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      Do you mean defined on the spot, or can the challenged player access any dictionary resources?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    2. Re:New rule by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Defined on the spot. If you don't know what the word means, or how to use it properly, it doesn't count. It means you have to play what you know, not just a memorized list.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:New rule by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, we've got a programmer in our group that we played with one night. After his second questionable 2 letter word we added a rule (democratically voted on and adopted) that you must be able to define your word and use it properly in a sentence if anyone asks.

      That's fine but that's not Scrabble. There is no requirement to know what word easy, just that it is a valid word. We occasionally had tournaments in college and I'd play for fun; wasn't any good but it was fun anyway. the best part was when someone looked at word and got ready to challenge it was to use it in a sentence but improperly so they'd think it wasn't a real word and lose a challenge. The mind games were as much fun as the tiles on the board.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    4. Re:New rule by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Democratically" implemented, i.e. a rule change after the game had begun. He should have balked.

      That's complete bull-cromulence! >:-(

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:New rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the best part was when someone looked at word and got ready to challenge it was to use it in a sentence but improperly so they'd think it wasn't a real word and lose a challenge

      Well, you know what they say: don't fear, threaper.

    6. Re:New rule by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      The vote was 4:1 in favor of the rule. He was not required to continue to play, and could have resigned in protest. Not that it actually mattered much - he was vying for last anyway - but we needed to set some ground rules for future games.

      Sometimes rule changes are necessary for balance. Previously, this group may or may not have also altered the CAH rules to state that blank cards may not be played as "Two midgets shitting in a bucket."* I say may have because I'm pretty certain it was discussed, but it was too late and I was too drunk to really recall whether the proposal was made official.

      *not because it was offensive, but because it was too like to get chosen as the winning combination. And it had been "played" four times that night already.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    7. Re:New rule by Malc · · Score: 2

      Some of my family members tried that on me once. The trouble was, having been uncomfortable previously not knowing the meaning of the words, I'd already memorised a bunch of them. They then tried to change the rules again that the words had to come from a tiny dictionary! The compromise was for me to write down the list and allow them to refer to it.

      Even the SOWPOD list of 2 letter words isn't too long and thus the meanings are easy enough to learn. I like it more than the restricted American vocabulary of the TWL list because it gives one much more freedom of play.

    8. Re:New rule by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2

      I play (intermediate level) competitive scrabble and this is how my wife and friends handicap me if we want to play at home. Frankly I don't mind it -- as a mere mortal without Nigel's photographic memory, it helps me a lot to keep the funky words memorized if I actually learn what they mean. Plus, learning that something is a noun vs a verb makes it a lot easier to infer if you can stick an S or ING or whatever on it.

      However, I've found that people still passive aggressively rage when you're beating them by 200 points and explain that AA is a type of lava or that ZA is just shitty slang for pizza that no one actually uses, so it is an imperfect solution....

    9. Re:New rule by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we've got a programmer in our group that we played with one night. After his second questionable 2 letter word

      The way you tell this it seems a programmer has to behave like a program

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    10. Re:New rule by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we've got a programmer in our group that we played with one night. After his second questionable 2 letter word we added a rule (democratically voted on and adopted) that you must be able to define your word and use it properly in a sentence if anyone asks.

      I've seen this all play out before with my group of friends and their programers. Now, the key to winning at Scrabble in the early stages of casual play will be learning all the 2 letter words and their definitions followed by learning all the 3 letter words and their definitions. Somebody will begin learning the 4 letter words. Typically, this is enough to gain the edge and win even against people with really good vocabularies as they can consistantly earn points. If he had the forethought to learn all the 2 letter words, he can no doubt learn their definitions too, and then move on. Now, you will either be faced with having him tell you what all these words mean also, or spending the time to learn them yourself. Eventually, my friends stopped playing because it was no longer a fun "beer and pretzels" game, but one involving lots of work to just have any chance of having fun.

    11. Re:New rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news 4 sheep vote that the fox shouldn't eat them.
      Playing with people like you who make up rules just so someone who is better at a game doesn't win isn't fun.

    12. Re:New rule by ebh · · Score: 1

      @!#?@!ing -INGS list.

      After 11 years of tournaments, it's the only list that still pisses me off in its arbitrariness (although FEEDINGS is finally good in TWL).

    13. Re:New rule by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      . If he had the forethought to learn all the 2 letter words, he can no doubt learn their definitions too, and then move on.

      He could, or he could accept that using all those 2 letter words is acceptable in competitive scrabble, but not beer and za games. It's a great rule for that purpose. (At least, as I've experienced it.) In casual games, I'm limited because I didn't memorize the definitions, in serious games I can use blocks of letters that make no sense, but are for some reason legal.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    14. Re:New rule by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      If the word is "questionable", then it should be resolved in a dictionary challenge, which is what the rules call for. Before play starts, you decide what your reference dictionary will be (Scabble publishes an official one, which is what is used in tournament play and anyone can get one if they want. It's handy, since all the things in a regular dictionary that are illegal Scrabble plays like proper nouns and so on are left out). If you think a guy's word isn't kosher, you can challenge it. If you can't find it in the dictionary, he picks up his tiles and loses his turn. Otherwise, the challenger loses his next turn.

    15. Re:New rule by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      I tend to think the rule should have taken effect after that round was over.

      I agree that rule changes mid-stream aren't fun, unless the fact that the rules can change was explicitly part of the initial rules. But you also don't expect a bunch of regular people to keep playing "arm-wrestling" with the world body-builder champion. And I think a case can be made that the original intent of Scrabble was to use words you know, not word-lists, even if that's how competitive play is done.

      Also I think that rule makes for a more interesting game, provided nobody is a complete dick when they compare the given definition to the dictionary definition. Of course, if that was instituted competitively, people would just memorize the two letter words.

    16. Re:New rule by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Today I learned that many slashdotters are categorically opposed to house-rules.

      They're trying to have fun, not prep for a tournament or slavishly follow a ruleset.

      It's similar to how I don't like playing chess against people who memorize chess openings, beyond maybe the first two moves anyway like the famous "pawn to king 4" -- I'd rather play either a different game, or a chess variant like Knightmare chess, because I want to have fun and memorizing data isn't fun. I'll memorize a ruleset but not data. No, a dictionary of tens of thousands of words doesn't count as a ruleset. Even some pro chess players share that opinion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    17. Re:New rule by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      This is why i hate playing certain games with Normals. They make up their own rules, assume that everybody plays that way and don't tell you about the made up rules till half way through the game. Typically these rules are supposed to make the game more "fun" (i.e. easy for people who don't really understand the game). I challenged somebodies word "lazer? I think you mean laser" and they didn't know what a challenge was, were surprised when their strange spelling wasn't in the dictionary, and didn't want to pick up their tiles or lose their next turn. Ok fine play how you, but don't call it scrabble. The other one that annoys no end is Monopoly when they put money on free parking. Not in the rules, and it makes the game last twice as long.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    18. Re:New rule by yarbo · · Score: 1

      Many slashdotters are opposed to being scrubs. Most house rules are an attempt to make a game more fun by cutting off higher level play. You don't think it's fair that someone learned more 2 letter words than you, so you made up a way to temporarily prevent him from using them after the game started.

      You could have found counters, but you didn't, because you're a scrub.

      http://www.sirlin.net/ptw-book...

    19. Re:New rule by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      "people would just memorize the two letter words."

      And we'd be okay with that - you memorize the definitions and use them in a sentence then they are part of your vocabulary. But there's a lot more to that than just remembering which 2 letter combinations scrabble considers to be "words".

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    20. Re:New rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a member of a gaming club, where higher level play is pretty much our raison d'être. Yet we employ more house rules than any family, because the official game rules often contain ridiculous loopholes or game-breaking bugs. We think that writers of game rules should think more like security specialists, trying to thwart a cracker getting into a computer.

      In the case of Scrabble, we do employ the house rule that you have to know what the words that you lay down mean, for the very simple reason that it prevents the spam-something-plausible-and-hope-it-sticks attack. With this rule, the skill part of the game is not diminished, but people no longer play nonsense words and we don't have to get the dictionary every time someone cannot figure out how to get rid of an X. In other words, it makes the game fun again.

    21. Re:New rule by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      After his second questionable 2 letter word we added a rule (democratically voted on and adopted) that you must be able to define your word and use it properly in a sentence if anyone asks.

      But that's just boring.
      A scrabble word is a scrabble word. Just agree on a dictionary and be done with it.

      If you really wanted to mess up your professional scrabble playing foe, you should have insisted on using a non-scrabble dictionary. Then qi and za (amoung others) wont be available and he'll be a lot easier to challenge.

      Besides which, any scrabble player worth his salt will be able to give the definition that is in the scrabble dictionary

      I think half the fun is out memorizing the competition.

      Cheers
      Ben

  9. Re:What's French for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's french for "I have never touched a woman"?

    This sentence would make no sense in french.

  10. Hobby vs Professional by Nephrite · · Score: 1

    This is a good case in hobby sports vs professional sports.
    As a hobby, playing games helps you to have fun and improve yourself.
    As a profession, it just loads you with useless things. Like those french words the champ is unable to use.

    1. Re:Hobby vs Professional by ebh · · Score: 5, Informative

      if you want to be a professional game/sport player, Scrabble is not the way to go. One year, the top prize at the US National Scrabble Championship, attended by about 700 players, was $25,000, the highest it ever was. Someone pointed out that year that $50,000 was the top prize of the national championship of Tiddlywinks.

  11. Re: ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox o by ebh · · Score: 1

    Some of the top English-language players in the world are Thai and speak very little English.

  12. Breaking News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    France passes emergency cultural laws?
    1. Require all scrabble players to speak Fluent French!
    2. Drug testing all scrabble players for ketchup and other banned un-french substances.
    3. Require all scrabble players to carry a baguette in their pocket at all times.

    1. Re:Breaking News! by ciaran2014 · · Score: 2

      And it's Scrablé, if you don't mind.

      --
      Help build the anti-software-patent wiki
    2. Re:Breaking News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      France passes emergency cultural laws?
      1. Require all scrabble players to speak Fluent French!
      2. Drug testing all scrabble players for ketchup and other banned un-french substances.
      3. Require all scrabble players to carry a baguette in their pocket at all times.

      If the tournament had taken place in Quebec, Canada, the provincial government would have demanded Richards' disqualification.

    3. Re:Breaking News! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      4. At the end of the game, the losing player waves a white flag and then goes on strike.
      5. The winning player is hauled before a commission which makes him/her apologize for exercising 'privilege'.

    4. Re:Breaking News! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Well, the Olympics demands local government keep their crazy-ass laws off the Olympics, or they don't get to have the Olympics.

      As this is in the same league...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:Breaking News! by godrik · · Score: 1

      Actually French people eat quite a bit of ketchup. But the only reason we don't keep baguette in our pocket is that it makes sitting difficult!

    6. Re:Breaking News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a baguette in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

    7. Re:Breaking News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Olympics can go fuck itself.

      It's a monumental cash grab, corrupt to the core, entirely over-blown with its self importance, and a complete waste of time, money, and energy.

      The world would be a better place without the Olympic games.

  13. Re: ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    when game is plaid by professionals (pro gamers), this activity becomes useless waste of time and a circle jerk.
    The whole idea of a game is fucked up by pro's.

  14. Double Word Score by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    And I spell F-R-E-N-C-H-T-O-A-S-T that's 45 points with a double word score for 90 points.

    1. Re:Double Word Score by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I guess we aren't doing freedom toast anymore.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Double Word Score by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Illegal play: "french toast" is two words. Crosswords may do multiple-word phrases all the time, but they aren't legal Scrabble plays.

  15. Strong AI by Forget4it · · Score: 1

    Does this make Nigel Richards a Strong AI? John Searle's Chinese Room and all.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is the study of how to make real computers act like the ones in the movies.
    1. Re:Strong AI by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      No, what he was doing is nothing at all like the intelligence demonstrated by John Searle's example. When Nigel carries on a conversation with someone who only speaks French without having any awareness of what he was actually saying then we can talk.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  16. Zarf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was an episode of the Flintstones where Fred was playing Scrabble. He used "zarf" as a fake word.

    1. Re:Zarf? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Maybe kwijybo will make it into the dictionary soon, too. There's always hope.

    2. Re:Zarf? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Zarf" is the proper name for those little paper jackets at Starbucks that you slip onto your coffee cup to prevent it from burning your fingers. Most of the baristas don't even know that.

    3. Re:Zarf? by disposable60 · · Score: 1

      Most of the baristas think Venti is Italian for extra-large.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    4. Re:Zarf? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why not? It's a perfectly cromulent word.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Zarf? by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

      I'd definitely give you points if I had any today. heh

      --
      "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  17. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Shut the fuck up.

  18. Re: Seriously? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Actually, qi is just the generic Chinese/Japanese word for energy. Electricity is den-ki, or "lightning energy."

  19. Re: Seriously? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    An article for slashdotters will usually explain what fucking is.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  20. Re: ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same could be said for every game ever invented.

  21. Re: ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    True. When somebody stops playing the game for fun, they have ceased playing. At that point they are worthy of our pity. We enter a moral gray area if we spectate and reinforce their abberant behavior.

  22. The beauty of language by jandersen · · Score: 1

    ...not as a compendium of the beauty and complexity of the English language.

    This rings particularly true, when we talk about French, of course.

  23. Re:What's French for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Je n'ai jamais touché une femme." (I have not ever touched a woman)
    It does work.

  24. Reminds me of a lot of religious jerks I know by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Know that Book by heart to the letter and don't have the foggiest idea what it's supposed to tell them...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. How would Scrabble work in Chinese? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Though it has broader meanings in Chinese and Japanese, the English loanword qi specifically means the energy sustaining one's life, the same thing that the Bible means when it says "spirit" (Greek pneuma; Hebrew ruach).

    Which raises another question: How would Scrabble work in Chinese? Do they make Pinyin Scrabble or something?

    1. Re:How would Scrabble work in Chinese? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I think that instead of a tile bag, the Chinese use a cement mixer.

    2. Re:How would Scrabble work in Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How would Scrabble work in Chinese?

      Pinyin?

    3. Re:How would Scrabble work in Chinese? by tepples · · Score: 1

      I've since discovered that a crossword game using Pinyin that is similar to Scrabble exists.

  26. Why would that be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why invent new rules just because someone happens to know more words than you? Not everyone may be able to explain what "solipsism" means, but some may have come across the word and use it.

  27. Re: ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox by Malc · · Score: 1

    Everybody has different levels of competitiveness and sense of enjoyment - where do you draw the line?

  28. How Odd by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "it's about cold memorization and mathematical probabilities"

    How odd. I never saw Scrabble as being anything but the above with one more element, quick recall. It's a database and probabilities game.

  29. The French Scrabble Champ Does Not Speak French by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    Neither do the French. French is a difficult and obsolete language made of gendered nouns and unusable grammar. It used to be spoken by some remaining native French people up to the end of the XXth century (date of the American TV series landings).

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:The French Scrabble Champ Does Not Speak French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. French is a beautiful language whose rigid structure and limited vocabulary force the thinker to compose their thoughts in a way the power of which is often inaccessible in English. French is the language of love, they say. English is a language with an unparalleled vocabulary and loose grammar.

      Or, to put it technically, French is LISP and English is PHP. Congratulations on being a PHP snob. Wide usage and kludgy power are not the only metrics for success, usefulness, or worthiness. Open your shitty mind. Nothing, languages included, should bow to a single standard. Practicality and the vagaries of life and experience demand more. There should be no one ring to rule them all.

  30. Martian Scrabble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The summary mentions Martian Scrabble, as if the Poster had a clue that it actually existed.

    Invented during the second week of January, 1966, at the Continental Lodge, in San Francisco, in Room 206, by a bored Irish Immigrant family.
    The Rules are very basic:
    Words must be plausible, pronounceable, and a definition must be provided. "Gxitb" is out, "Stalagotte", a fallen Stalagmite, is in.
    The Referee, sometimes called "Mom", wrote the words down with their definitions, in Pitman, on a yellow Legal Pad. Over the years, many Pads would be filled in.
    Normal Scrabble scoring occurs.
    The Game traveled East over the years, along with current copies of the Dictionary.

  31. Re:What's French for by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2

    whoosh

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  32. Quel outrage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bordel de merde! Attrapez ce salaud d'un sans-papiers et egorgez-le sur la Place de la Concorde! Zut alors!

    1. Re:Quel outrage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      La plume de ma Tante est sur le Pont d'Avignons, l'on y danse, l'on y danse.

  33. Re: ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody has different levels of competitiveness and sense of enjoyment - where do you draw the line?

    Nowhere. The only place I'm qualified to draw the line is for myself.

  34. wait a minute... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    I would think the hardest part about French scrabble would be finding an e with an accent mark over it. For real though, how do they handle accented versus not? They're two different words in most cases, although that wouldn't matter for scoring.

    1. Re:wait a minute... by tomhath · · Score: 1

      They ignore it in French. Germans have umlauted letters. I Have no idea what a Chinese Scrabble set would look like though.

    2. Re:wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marqueur Magique.
      Pour la Scrabble Martienne, le Marqueur Magique Martien.
      (I don't know the subtleties here, but a Magic Marker _must_ be Masculine, even in France.)

    3. Re:wait a minute... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      The Chinese Scrabble set takes a forklift to carry around...

  35. Scrabble? by CurryCamel · · Score: 1

    I've never played scrabble. The only place I've seen scrabble played (if it is the game that looks like a crossword puzzle?) is in Hollywood movies. Somehow it smacks of anglosaxon culture.
    I'm not frrench, so I am curious: how popular is this game in France?

    1. Re:Scrabble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the time that you took to post your Internet Inadequacy, you would have found out that the French indeed play Scrabble, and that they ignore the Accents in game play, just as they are commonly doing in informal written conversation, for the last few years.
      I'm sure that the Academie Francaise is horrified, but that is their purpose. They have been horrified for close to four centuries now.

  36. Even weaker comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't read the article. He didn't say it himself - the head of some other tournament he participated in said it. And didn't mean it in any formal or clinical sense of the word when it doesn't even have such a definition. It's just a popular culture term for a remarkably good ability to remember visual or written things so what else would he say as an off the cuff remark about the winner? And being an idiot wanting to prove yourself you don't just argue against your strawman, you also disclose which of those words is the only one you know (I know more and English is my third language so they're not that unusual). You succeeded. In proving that you're an idiot, that is.

  37. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you provide a car analogy?

  38. That's unpossible! by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    Next you'll be trying to tell us that some people play Sudoku without any knowledge of math.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  39. Re: ob od oe of oh oi om on oo op or os ou ow ox o by aberglas · · Score: 1

    That is because the Thai education system uses scrabble to help teach kids English, which is a very different language to Thai. So most Thais have played the game, and so unsurprisingly a few get very good at it.