Slashdot Mirror


Rosetta Probe's Comet Reaches Closest Approach To the Sun

An anonymous reader writes: The European Space Agency has released pictures taken by the Rosetta probe at comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko as it reached closest approach to the Sun. The comet has now travelled 750 million kilometers since Rosetta arrived, and the increased solar radiation has caused ices to sublimate and create jets of gas. "The activity reaches its peak intensity around perihelion and in the weeks that follow – and is clearly visible in the spectacular images returned by the spacecraft in the last months. One image taken by Rosetta's navigation camera was acquired at 01:04 GMT, just an hour before the moment of perihelion, from a distance of around 327 km." They've released both still images and animations of the comet's outgassing. "Rosetta's measurements suggest the comet is spewing up to 300 kg of water vapor – roughly the equivalent of two bathtubs – every second. This is a thousand times more than was observed this time last year when Rosetta first approached the comet. ... Along with gas, the nucleus is also estimated to be shedding up to 1000 kg of dust per second, creating dangerous working conditions for Rosetta." It's a fascinating, close-up look at a comet during its most volatile time.

16 comments

  1. Dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could get a lot closer to the sun if they made sure the probe got there at night instead of the daytime. Geez.

    1. Re:Dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now that was an outgassing straight from uranus.

  2. Interesting variation! by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting variation in the outgassing rate as the comet rotates! And it's quite clear that the outgassing comes from localized jets, and not from broad areas of the comet, although we'd already seen that from earlier images.

    By looking at a very low phase angle (almost into the sun), we're seeing the forward scattering, so the dust shows up brightly-- a good way to look at very fine particles.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  3. Are you all stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're fakes. The probe doesn't work because the pinko yoorpans were afraid of nucular radiation and fitted it with hippy-drippy solar panels instead.

    It was on hothardware a few months back.

  4. outbound loop... by magarity · · Score: 1

    This is all very cool but I think if they can keep the thing transmitting it will be much cooler to see what it observes on the far end of the comet's orbit.
    I wonder if a comet hitchhiking probe could be made to passively observe the Oort cloud and wake back up fully to report the next time its comet came back to the inner system.

    1. Re:outbound loop... by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      This is all very cool but I think if they can keep the thing transmitting it will be much cooler to see what it observes on the far end of the comet's orbit.
      I wonder if a comet hitchhiking probe could be made to passively observe the Oort cloud and wake back up fully to report the next time its comet came back to the inner system.

      67P doesn't make it all the way out to the Oort cloud, I'm afraid; it is a short-period comet. Barely gets past the orbit of Jupiter.
      http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx...
      --that's why Rosetta could rendezvous with it.

      --if it did go all the way out to the Oort cloud, though, the probe wouldn't be generating any power to speak of at that distance, and hence wouldn't make any observations. Even if it did wake up next time round, all it would report was "I didn't see anything because I was turned off."

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    2. Re:outbound loop... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      If we are going to make additional forays into the Oort cloud, then we are going to need more fuel for the RTGs to power them.

      Most use Pu 238, which is in relatively short supply. There is a current proposal to use Am (Americenium) on an interstellar probe, but I do not know if they even have a working model yet

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    3. Re:outbound loop... by magarity · · Score: 1

      the probe wouldn't be generating any power to speak of at that distance, and hence wouldn't make any observations

      The Voyager probes are way the heck out there and still have power. The nuclear source they use is what's needed for a long term comet hitchhiker.

    4. Re:outbound loop... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      The Voyager probes have turned off most of their instruments and are still going to die in a few years, and it takes longer to reach the oort cloud.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    5. Re:outbound loop... by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      Very highly unlikely. The Oort cloud is a mindboggling distance away. You would need to be able to engineer something that can survive a round trip of anywhere between ninety thousand and six million years. Then you need to figure out a way to let someone who may or may not even be recognisably human, let alone able to speak the same language, know when it comes back, so they can collect the data.

  5. Amazing to see this happening close up by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    Comets are going to be an important source of water for the colonists of New Shanghai.

  6. To quote Clark Griswald by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    "Roll 'em up."

  7. The ESA has the same masters as NASA by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    All space agencies are in on it. Their countries have also all signed the Antarctic Treaty. They know there's more land beyond Antarctica -- and there's nowhere up above to go, the firmament keeps us in.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  8. Due to global warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a thousand times more than was observed this time last year"

    Is this due to global warming? Why would it be so much greater this time?

  9. Perihelion [Re:Due to global warming?] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would it be so much greater this time?

    The title of this article answers your question: it's outgassing more because it's closer to the sun now than it was last year. That's what comets do. That's what the word "perihelion" means.

  10. Why is the importance of these observation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever since Richard Feynman said that he had never seen a paper that was written as a result of observations made by the space program and so had ignored it, I've tended to do likewise.

    While there is some little value to just mapping the universe, do these observations of the comet facilitate any basic understanding?
    I know astrophysics is about using the universe as a giant lab to understand the basic laws of nature but astronomy is largely not.

    No, I'm not a Luddite or anti-science. I have a PhD in physics from Caltech.