Slashdot Mirror


Wuala Encrypted Cloud-Storage Service Shuts Down

New submitter craigtp writes: Wuala, one of the more trusted cloud-storage services that employed encryption for your files, is shutting down. Users of the service will have until 15th November 2015 to move all of their files off the service before all of their data is deleted. From the announcement: "Customers who have an active prepaid annual subscription will be eligible to receive a refund for any unused subscription fees. Your refund will be calculated based on a termination date effective from today’s date, even though the full service will remain active until 30 September 2015 and your data will be available until 15 November 2015. Refunds will be automatically processed and issued to eligible customers in coming weeks. Some exceptions apply. Please visit www.wuala.com for more information."

128 comments

  1. WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    NSA strikes again...

    1. Re:WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      more like wuala's competition, with more access to lawyers, with more ability to and benefit from submitting claims to the NSA, whined up all the right channels to profitability.

      box.com might just make it out of their mess

    2. Re:WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't box.com just an IPO stock scam?

    3. Re:WtF? by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can't be certain that's true. It could look the same way whether it was NSA action or not. That's what an NSL is intended to ensure.

      So it's quite reasonable to assume that this is NSA action, but don't be close minded about it. There could be other reasons.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:WtF? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, no canary?
      SpiderOak updates their canary every six months:
      https://spideroak.com/canary

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    5. Re:WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lol. Yes. I'm sure the NSA just _hates_ the idea of people uploading stuff to a central location they think is encrypted with 100% security.

      Bollocks. The NSA would prefer a service like this they can get to to people just encrypting stuff on flash drives.

    6. Re:WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be they're being doing the ethical thing and closing up shop rather than giving the NSA a new secret back door to your data.

      In that case this is the least evil option that retains some degree of safety.

    7. Re:WtF? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      Just as likely somebody identified an incorrectable zero-day flaw in their system and was 'nice' enough to give them time to fix it or shut down before revealing it

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    8. Re:WtF? by lucm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Did you know that Box's CEO pays himself a very modest salary, lives in a tiny apartment near the office, drives an old car, and got a very small stake in the IPO (something like 4%)?

      The guy has been working like a madman for over 10 years. I'm not a big fan of him, I find him obnoxious, but he is definitely not a scammer.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    9. Re:WtF? by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      afaik, they're swiss. not the parent company (lacie) or the parent's parent company (seagate) but wuala itself was incorporated in switzerland to give it some protection from NSA's claws. I think they simply priced themselves out of the market. I used to recommend them (their free tier was great) when ubuntuONE shut down but when they went for paid only accounts, the price was just too high compared to competition.

    10. Re: WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this? Canary -> canary in the coal mine? Some kind of dead man switch? 'We will update this with proof we are who we say we are while we can. Of this stops, it means we were compromised'

      ?

    11. Re:WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't box.com just an IPO stock scam?

      Go public and you have capital to buy lobbyists. More importantly, the investment bankers who brought you public have lobbyists, as do the fund managers to whom the IBs hawked the IPO shares.

      Get listed or get acquired, or get the fuck out. Lifestyle businesses are death to investors and founders and employees alike. Exit or die.

      /why, yes, I'm bitter that the formerly-profitable unrelated company at which I wasted my career at decided to remain a lifestyle company and never exit, why do you ask? :)

    12. Re:WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Six months is an eternity. There's no sense in having a canary if it's allowed to get that stale, especially updating at predictable intervals. And if the plan is to simply delete the document as the signal, there's no sense updating it at all. As it stands, anyone wishing to serve a national security letter against SpiderOak would have done so on August 3rd, and it could be next February before anyone suspects trouble.

    13. Re: WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    14. Re:WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wuala is based in Switzerland. If I could pick one country that doesn't care about what the NSA has to say, it would be Switzerland.

    15. Re:WtF? by mysidia · · Score: 2

      There are thousands of other possible reasons to shutdown that have nothing to do with security, for example: business not doing well enough to continue: poor market penetration, people not interested in their product, competition eating their lunch.

    16. Re: WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The premise is that while the NSLs can prohibit you from talking about it, there isn't much legal precedent for forcing you to lie.

    17. Re: WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubt it. Those swiss fuckheads are the same assholes trying to get assange so he can be nabbed by the us. Fuck the swiss and "cloud"storage in general.

    18. Re:WtF? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      IIRC there has been a court decision, though I can't remember which court, in what context, or whether it was a binding precedent, that to kill a canary is to violate the terms of the NSL.

      Possibly it was in the context of a secure communication company closing down because it could no longer protect it's customers.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    19. Re: WtF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switzerland, Sweden... guess they're all the same when you're an ignorant geographically challenged dumbass American.

    20. Re:WtF? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      You don't kill a canary, you do nothing and that fact is noted.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    21. Re:WtF? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      They (SpiderOak) started out doing it monthly, then realized that if anything happened to change the canary status, it would be after months of legal process and so they settled on six months. There is a fairy interesting FAQ on the topic of warrant canaries here:
      https://canarywatch.org/faq.html

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    22. Re:WtF? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That can be interpreted as killing the canary. I'll agree that it shouldn't be illegal, but then most of what NSL letters authorize *should* be illegal.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    23. Re:WtF? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      This is from the CanaryWatch site FAQ (https://canarywatch.org/faq.html
      "We're not aware of any case where a court has upheld compelled false speech"
      It's in the fifth question up from the bottom of the FAQ

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  2. Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sucks.

  3. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who said it was? In this case you paid for space, and you got it. They are closing down and you get your files back AND a refund. I see no issue here. no different than if you had your crap in a storage unit and they decided to close down mid contract.

    This is how a business runs, and when it closes, how it properly closes.

  4. So it goes... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2

    Sad to see it go, but I applaud them giving notice. A month is plenty of time to set up another provider. I hope none of their customers miss the announcements.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:So it goes... by mhkohne · · Score: 2

      The one month is till it goes read-only - your data is safe till 15 November, which is better than a lot of services have done in the past.

      --
      A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  5. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by SpankiMonki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your rational, sober, succinct and to the point comments have no place here. Or pretty much anywhere else on the internet. Or television. Or talk radio. Definitely not talk radio.

  6. Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of NSA-proof alternatives.

    1. Re:Oh well by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      There's a new one that just opened up at www.therealwualaandtotallynotthensa.com

    2. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a new one that just opened up at www.therealwualaandtotallynotthensa.com

      Link is broken.

    3. Re:Oh well by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can't even spend $9 to back your joke by buying the domain and putting up a quick website? Lame.

      That's the problem with kids nowadays. No follow-through.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:Oh well by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      If I were to make such a joke, you can be certain I would include a NSA-style logo, photos of helpdesk people dressed as MiB, incredibly tiny font for the copyright and NDA text, etc.

  7. My preferred alternative to Wuala by kheldan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's called 'the hard drive in the computer on my desk'.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Combined with a bit of owncloud that's a very good alternative.

    2. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hope you have an offsite backup as well. Because what could possibly happen to that "hard drive in the computer on my desk", right? We all know "the cloud" is ridiculously overhyped, but automatic offsite backup is really one of it's killer applications.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      In either scenario the files are all sitting on the hard drive under your desk. Basically all you said is: "My preferred alternative is no backups."

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by nnull · · Score: 1

      And then you get a notice like this and your offsite backup is gone. My hard drive outlast most of these cloud services, not because the hardware is reliable but because the damn company itself is unreliable.

    5. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 2

      Bingo. Also, trying to back up more than 1TB of data on 1Mbit upload bandwidth is an exercise in futility.

    6. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by mirix · · Score: 2

      So make an encrypted blob and throw it on S3 for 25 cents a month? Something like that that likely won't fall apart overnight, and the encryption is on your end so the NSA can get stuffed.

      What's the point of encrypted cloud where you need to trust the host..?

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    7. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      You're not thinking this through... your hard drive is not going to survive a fire or theft, or you being momentarily stupid and accidentally formatting your disk, or a virus doing it for you, etc.

      First... it's a backup, which implies you already *have* a local copy of all your data (preferably two copies). It doesn't matter if your backup provider shuts down. You can just get a new one, and you're backed up again as soon as your files finish uploading. As you saw, this provider is providing months for you to transition over.

      Second, if you don't want your backup provider to go away unexpectedly, go with a name you know. For instance, use Amazon S3 / Glacier with a local backup client. They're affordable and you know they're not going to disappear next week. Probably not next decade either. Or one of the other big names is fine too.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    8. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      That's actually what I do. I use a NAS device to backup my computers, and it backs itself up to an Amazon S3 folder.
       

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    9. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by lgw · · Score: 1

      The point of the offsite back is not to be there forever, but to be there if you lose your local hard drive in the near future. That's why it's a "backup". If it vanishes, make a new backup. Without the cloud, it's a royal pain to keep offsite backups current.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pfft...

      I use steganography and hide my personal files in the bit torrent cloud of porn.

      That stuff is forever.

    11. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by Troed · · Score: 1

      Yes. And then Seafile (http://seafile.com) open source encrypted cloud storage to access it.

    12. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      Does your hard drive give you a 3 months notice before it breaks and leaves you without a backup?
      This cloud provider just did.

    13. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by kheldan · · Score: 1

      There is nothing on my computer that I can't live without. That is by design not chance, by the way. My computer, my phone, and any other electronics I have are just tools and conveniences, not a lifestyle. The house burns to the ground? Life goes on.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    14. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hard drive in a fireproof lockbox or rented storage unit Vs takeovers, buyouts, bankruptcies, hackers, NSLs, corporate mismanagement and rogue employees... I'm 100% sure I have thought it through. Are you sure you have?

    15. Re:My preferred alternative to Wuala by Nel_IT · · Score: 1

      I use pCloud's desktop app - pCloud Drive - for backup. It's very easy to use because it creates something like a virtual drive that does not take space on your computer. I.e. your files are not duplicated on your computer and on the cloud. You just place the content you need to backup in your pCloud Drive. It's pretty fast compared to anything else I've tested. With most cloud services backup takes ages when you store large content.

  8. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well .... yes you did pay for space .... but not always with money.
    Wuala used to let yet trade local { space, uptime, bandwith } for cloud space.

    They got rid of that a while ago.

    That was quite annoying as I'd built up a 50Gb cloud space and was using about half of it for archive ... more fool me!

    They cancelled the trading arangements ... cancelled that cloud space ... and then wouldn't let you log back it to clean the over-space amounts once they'd reset your account back to the fremium levels.

    It's no wonder Wuala went under ... you can't trust anyone, encryption or not, once they start changing the deal arbitrarily.

    -- I'm probably posting this A/C .... I can't be fecked logging in.

  9. greenwow is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the way of his kind.

  10. At least they're giving notice by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sorry they're shutting down. At least they're giving their users some notice, which is good.

    I suspect there's a niche market in encrypted storage online that would be marketed as (supposedly) "NSA proof", if such a thing is even possible. I suspect that the current reach of the NSA is for all intents and purposes unlimited in the US. I doubt there's much they couldn't get into if they wanted to.

    I mean, we know that Wall Street has been thoroughly and utterly penetrated and is basically the plaything of corporations and financial houses.Add in the activity by blackhats ripping off whatever they can from the major brokerage houses and Wall Street is a joke in terms of any fairness.

    Given that, is it so far-fetched to surmise that the NSA has managed to get it's taps into virtually every communication medium we use? (Especially after the recent revelations about AT&T being in cahoots with the NSA.) At this point I'd be more surprised if they didn't have everything tapped.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:At least they're giving notice by timrod · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I doubt there's much they couldn't get into if they wanted to.

      In the United States, there is literally NOTHING they cannot get into. As long as the owner of whatever service or software they want to get into lives within or visits the physical jurisdiction of the United States, there is absolutely nothing stopping them from serving a National Security Letter that gives that person the opportunity to cooperate or be thrown in jail until they cooperate. The only way to have a service that's even semi- "NSA proof" is to have it reside entirely outside of the United States.. though all that will do is stop the NSA until they decide they want whatever you have badly enough to use the resources to get it.

    2. Re:At least they're giving notice by pz · · Score: 1

      Which is why if you want real security, you roll your own encryption, no?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re: At least they're giving notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a radical idea. If you've got files you don't want the NSA to have access to then store them on an encrypted drive that only you have physical access to. Problem solved.

    4. Re: At least they're giving notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does not solve the problem of having a off site backup. In case you get robbed or your house burns down.

    5. Re:At least they're giving notice by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1, Troll

      In the United States, there is literally NOTHING they cannot get into.

      Except ClintonEmail.com server. NSA couldn't get into that.

    6. Re:At least they're giving notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's definitely a plus for her.

    7. Re:At least they're giving notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that, is it so far-fetched to surmise that the NSA has managed to get it's taps into virtually every communication medium we use?

      There's another Snowden-style whistle-blower that will be releasing an enormous treasure-trove on the NSA's activities.

      Expect it to hit the wires late October (just in time for US elections).

    8. Re:At least they're giving notice by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The best option is to use a normal, un-encrypted storage provider and do your encryption client side. Don't rely on their security or resistance to NSLs etc.

      My current preferred combo is OneDrive and CloudBacko. OneDrive is cheap and if you go here you can get unlimited storage, otherwise it's 1TB. CloudBacko is cheap and based on established server backup software. It's configurable enough to do what I want and seems to implement encryption properly (including file names, files added to encrypted archives to prevent file size analysis etc.) Of course, simply using TrueCrypt containers is a good plan too.

      Don't rely on any one provider (I can switch any time easily) and don't rely on the provider to keep your data safe.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:At least they're giving notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? Nobody will give a damn. Face it, there has been no public outcry over Snowden's revelations. The US public, given a choice, would have him punished harshly. The European public, which should be most outraged, remained silent. The European governments did absolutely nothing, except grounding all the aircraft - including diplomatic flights - on which Snowden might have been when the US demanded it. It's over. They have won. There has not been and there will never be any battle.

    10. Re:At least they're giving notice by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      OneDrive? Does it work straight forward and reliable under Linux?
      Some of us live in both worlds. (Or even 3, throwing OS X in the mix.)

    11. Re:At least they're giving notice by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It does. CloudBacko has a Linux version that supports OneDrive, and you can access it via the web interface for non-encrypted stuff.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re: At least they're giving notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physical, encrypted, local backup swapped out weekly with rotating unit kept in a self-storage unit. NSA never knows it exists and you, at worst, would lose only a weeks worth of data.

  11. NSA is plausible. by blang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But also plausible might be that the encryption has been cracked or breached lets say by white or black hats, and the site decides to let the customers get their data out and shut down before the breach is known across the the full hat population.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  12. Re:You can certainly expect that the Republicans.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By "the truth" you mean the exact same post slightly modified to fit with the topic being discussed? I find American politics funny and pointless. Everyone's 100% committed to his own colour of right-wing party while still being blind that they're both the same.

  13. Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by jest3r · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using Sync.com for the past year. They've been sort of in beta but releasing features. 5GB free.

    SpiderOak is decent but they recently dropped their free plan, so not sure what's going on there.

    MEGA was great but Kim.com said last week in Wired that the company is run by criminals

    Tresorit is good but expensive. Maybe that's why they've been around so long.
    Bitcasa pulled a Wuala last year and closed down their consumer cloud storage after a lawsuit. That's pretty much it. There's OwnCloud which is do it yourself. And BitTorrent Sync which is kind of do it yourself but they've been adjusting pricing so it's bait and switch as well.

    1. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      These are more techie-oriented rather than for general desktop use (they don't have shiny GUI sync clients, and are aimed at Linux/BSD users), but two I'd recommend:

      rsync.net. Remote ZFS filesystem you can scp files to, or access over ssh via a restricted shell that supports a range of backup tools. For encrypted backups, if you're on a unix machine, you can point duplicity at it. They've been around a long time, and have a warrant canary, though if you encrypt the files client-side with something like duplicity, they won't even have your data in the first place.

      Tarsnap. Encrypted, deduplicating incremental backup. The encrypted blobs are stored on Amazon S3. Custom client that by design keeps them from ever seeing the unencrypted data.

    2. Re: Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a portable hard drive, encrypt it on your own with free tools, remember the key without writing it down, store it in a location that only you have physical access to. Problem solved.

    3. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by cutinf · · Score: 1

      I don't get these "encrypted" cloud storage providers. The only way to truly trust them, is to never hand them the keys in the first place, encrypt client side. Many customers security savy enough to want encryption also realize server side cloud encryption is broken by design. No surprise to me they shut down, I don't see who would be there customers.

      Encrypt locally using any of the good open source crypto libraries, or a free tool like TrueCrypt, and THEN store in the cloud with standard mechanisms like google drive or S3, cheaper too. Keep the keys in a separate place. This way it take a double compromise - both the key storage and the data storage, before your data is compromised.

    4. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Syncdocs [syncdocs.com] is also pretty good, just adding a layer of end-to-end encryption to Google Drive, so as long as you keep below 15GB it's free.

    5. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by strstr · · Score: 0

      Pretty much any online storage, ftp, ssh company can encrypt stuff. Just run it through an encryption tool before upload. I do that with ssh and ftp, simply pipe it through to the encryption software (which could be like 7zip, or zip if thats your thing, or any other software encryption tool) then pipe that to the ftp ssh scp, etc.

      If I am not mistaken Nero Back It Up will encrypt and then ftp or upload its back ups for you as well.

      Another service is idrive, for $14 for the first year you get 1TB with their best promotion.

      They let you use a private key for encryption - one that is kept hidden from their online service. Idrive is one of the largest online back up providers, seems funny they weren't mentioned as having a solution.

    6. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by strstr · · Score: 0

      In the case of most web based servers with ftp, and ssh you will have http/https and ftps to share your files and retrieve your files.

      Idrive includes both back up and sync service, and you can share files with others once uploaded.

    7. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Just use a backup app that supports multiple cloud services, instead of relying on their client software. Then you can use any random service, like Google Nearline ($0.01/GB/month, instant access) or OneDrive or Dropbox or a combination of them all.

      It's more secure that way too, since you are not relying on the security of the cloud service, you are doing all the encryption at your end and using client software that they can't be forced to backdoor with an NSL.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by Troed · · Score: 1

      You don't get Wuala - yet client side encryption was precisely their thing.

    9. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also Syncthing: https://syncthing.net/

      After Bittorrent Sync lost some of my changes between syncs last year without creating backup copies, I switched to Syncthing. Works great!

    10. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's OwnCloud which is do it yourself.

      Or there is hosted ownCloud provider like https://owndrive.com

    11. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      MEGA [mega.co.nz] was great but Kim.com said last week in Wired [wired.co.uk] that the company is run by criminals.

      Microsoft and Apple were both ran at one time by criminals. Yet billions of individuals continue to do business with those companies.

    12. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Care to back this up with some facts?

    13. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually just created a second SpiderOak account via the client. Still 2 GB free.

    14. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Both Jobs and Gates have have been arrested or at least had arrest warrants issued for driving infractions. Jobs also admitted to phone phreaking and drug use. I'd be extremely surprised if Gates also didn't have something in his past more serious than traffic violations. Regardless though, they are criminal although petty offenses.

      As far as I can tell, Bill Liu/William Yan/Donghua Liu/whatever other name he might go by has yet to be actually convicted of any crime. So currently he's just as much a criminal as Gates and Jobs were. Kim Dotcom on the other hand has had actual real criminal convictions in Germany for computer fraud and data espionage.

    15. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by chihowa · · Score: 1

      You mean "client side encryption" conducted by closed source binaries delivered from their servers (and updated automatically)?

      You don't seem to get the trust issues here. Having one company handle both the encryption and the data storage is folly. The whole "client side encryption" aspect may or may not be true, but since you can't verify it it amounts to nothing more than marketing.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    16. Re:Alternative Encrypted Cloud Storage Providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy nut but encryption and cloud storage noob here. (Yes, I will admit that here and deal with the flames) Would putting a TrueCrypt container into drop box work? I can encrypt and decrypt locally and have it mirror and update to the cloud. Or is that not going to work for some reason I don't see yet?

  14. Data rush by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the service is able to cope with all its users rushing to retrieve their data before the deadline.

  15. Maybe not the NSA -- it might just be business by mattb47 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wuala is owned by Lacie. Lacie was purchase by Seagate in 2014. Seagate has it's own online backup products. Maybe Seagate wants to eliminate a redudant or money-losing service? It happens...

    Yes, the NSA is the bogeyman, and is a threat to secure encryption everywhere. But the invisible hand of capitalism can slap someone as well.

    1. Re:Maybe not the NSA -- it might just be business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the invisible hand of capitalism can slap someone as well.

      Oh yes!! Hit me! HIT ME! Just don't leave me!

    2. Re:Maybe not the NSA -- it might just be business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wuala is owned by Lacie. Lacie was purchase by Seagate in 2014. Seagate has it's own online backup products. Maybe Seagate wants to eliminate a redudant or money-losing service?

      Bingo

  16. Why would they trust Wuala? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Customers who want privacy won't trust Wuala , they'll use local storage, or if they really have no choice but to use cloud, they'll only upload encrypted files they encrypted themselves.

    Customers that don't yet* care about privacy won't pay extra to get this.

    * I find they don't care about privacy right up until it bites them in the ass, then suddenly its massive to them. The "dump facebook" moment.

    1. Re:Why would they trust Wuala? by blang · · Score: 1

      Astutely put.
      Basically the company has carved out a non-existing and non growable niche.

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  17. Wind of change by lucm · · Score: 1

    President Trump will change that flawed perception that Republicans are dishonest morons.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  18. Sooooooo by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    How is Dropbox doing lately? This is what worries me about "the cloud"...how to pick the winner to adopt before the end of the contest.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  19. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 0

    >They are closing down and you get your files back AND a refund.

    Of course copies your files may go to various government agencies as well.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  20. bad marketing, most likely by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Wuala is also something I've *never* heard of despite being generally well informed in this arena.

    When you have virtually zero brand recognition, that's not a good sign.

    1. Re:bad marketing, most likely by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine needed me to use it to do some work for him overseas. I couldn't get the desktop (java) client to work. The web client sorta worked, but the way the groupings and folders worked was unique among permission models I'd encountered, and sometimes what you expected to work didn't do anything. And then I hadn't logged in in a while and they sent me a few notices to "use it or lose it" and since I wasn't using it they eventually deleted my account, so I had little incentive to try it again.

      I can't think of a successful web company that does it that way.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:bad marketing, most likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft did that with Hotmail addresses.

  21. Set up your own.. syncthing.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get a friend to agree to peer with you, or set up a second old netbook or something with a spare drive. Safer than the cloud, no third parties to trust.

    It's like btsync, but GPL and no folder limit.

    1. Re:Set up your own.. syncthing.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you work around all the browser bloat and put the URL in the post title? Modern browsers will automatically detect a link if you select some text but not if it's already a link to something else. Not only that, it's impossible to select only the link text because if you click and drag over text that happens to be part of a link, the browsers think you're trying to drag the link somewhere else and won't do the normal text selection. There's no way to grab that syncthing.org link without retyping it or selecting a large chunk of the post title and deleting all the extra text.

      Can we please have some basic usability by posting links in the actual post content?

      syncthing.org

      There. Was that really too hard?

    2. Re:Set up your own.. syncthing.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you can actually use some HTML here: <a href="http://syncthing.org">syncthing.org</a> -> syncthing.org

    3. Re:Set up your own.. syncthing.org by Dagger2 · · Score: 1

      Hold Alt (in Firefox, at least). Although that is certainly more of a pain than just clicking on a link.

      You get bonus points if you actually give the right link too.

  22. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a mile of difference between a physical storage unit and cloud storage.

    It is possible to monitor your physical storage unit to make sure nobody gets in. During the tenancy period, it is effectively yours. How many times have you been allowed to do something analogous for your cloud provider?

    In fact, "crap in a storage unit" is probably one of the most secure, low cost way of storing backups, noting that one should never underestimate the bandwidth of a truck full of tapes.

  23. Subject line. NOT part of the comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, a one word post. Too lazy to even copy the subject line into the comment area so it makes sense? Lame.

    .

  24. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by Calydor · · Score: 1

    NSA checks your credit card history.
    NSA finds a payment to a storage unit.
    NSA gets in a car.
    NSA drives to a hardware store.
    NSA buys a bolt cutter.
    NSA drives to the storage unit.
    NSA rummages through your stuff after using the 'key' they just bought.

    Yep, very secure. I'd look up that XKCD comic with the five dollar wrench if I felt like it.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  25. Re:You can certainly expect that the Republicans.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this is the typical stereotype thrown at americans by smug europeans who think they're not subject to the same kinds of kool-aid propaganda in their home countries.

  26. Re:You can certainly expect that the Republicans.. by epyT-R · · Score: 0

    Yeah whatever. neocon 'christians' or 'liberal' marxists, what's the difference? Both are dogmatic, big statist ideologues who always want a bit more of my money, a bit more control over my property, and a bit more of my liberty. Whether it's for jesus, the children, or for the latest socjus oppression quest, the excuse is the same and it's getting old and foul smelling.

  27. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

    I'll make my own cloud, with blackjack and hookers! ...
    wait, that's just owning a computer, an internet connection, a blackjack game, and hookers.

  28. This is the problem with the cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cloud is not a storage in any permanent sense.

  29. Sigh by ledow · · Score: 1

    Before we start on the conspiracy theories - ANYONE who relies on a third party to encrypt their stuff is not worried about security. Not really.

    And any cloud provider will accept and store encrypted files that ONLY YOU have the key to.

  30. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

    Considering that the data is encrypted on the client and only stored in encrypted form on the servers, that won't do much good.
    Unless, of course, Wuala secretly copied the encryption keys.

  31. Re: once again: the CLOUD is NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not a scalable attack. That only works on specific targets. A warrant to a cloud storage provider gets them access to thousands of users' data at once. Not to mention that the end users have no way to know it happened (i.e. no broken lock).

  32. Re: once again: the CLOUD is NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NSA finds every bit of your stuff packed in a pretty tough safe and the storage unit owner doesn't know the combination.

    That's local encryption for you. Your trust in the service is replaced by trust in the encryption algorithm.

  33. Re:Subject line. NOT part of the comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoooosh!!!!

    You're really not as smart as you think you are.

  34. Re:once again: the CLOUD is NOT by mysidia · · Score: 1

    In fact, "crap in a storage unit" is probably one of the most secure, low cost way of storing backups

    Except in a generic storage pod..... any random thief is one pair of bolt cutters away from raiding your unit for anything interesting, and insurance only covers the replacement cost of the media itself, not the data on it.

  35. ownCloud based OwnDrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use FOSS/ownCloud based OwnDrive.com and love it.

  36. Don't let the folder hit you in the bum on the.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. way out the door.

    And thank you very much for your business.

    Now get the heck out of my servers.

  37. Loved it when it was distributed by aarongadberry · · Score: 1

    Stopped using it after they killed that feature a few years ago.

    1. Re:Loved it when it was distributed by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Same

      The storage sharing and the social features (groups) were the two killer features it had.

      I have yet to find any other working service that's doing distributed storage in such a way. The only one I know of similar in the works is storj.io

      I have yet to find anything to replace the groups functionality of wuala. I think DCC would be the closest thing I am aware of.

      I really hope someone makes something that includes both of the features.

      Wuala sure was a lot of fun though when they allowed storage sharing. after they stopped the community just kinda died more or less overnight.

      I wish I knew where everyone went.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  38. ANOTHER lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let this be ANOTHER lesson boys and girls.

    1. Keep your data under YOUR control by keeping it on hardware that YOU own and have 100% control over.

    2. Only companies that actually encrypt data get shut down. The ones that pretend to encrypt it, get hacked and then they do it again and again.

  39. So... What cloud "Boom" exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah.. there's no boom in the cloud services industry. It will go away, hopefully sooner than later.

  40. Drive Failure and False Economy again by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    People really should ask about the mean time to failure for cloud storage companies before using them for storing data they dont have redundantly backed up elsewhere.

    --
    John_Chalisque
    1. Re:Drive Failure and False Economy again by mhkohne · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I doubt anyone you could talk to would be able to answer. Their engineering and operations staff might know (at the least, they'd be able to look at MTBF on their drives, and what their redundancy is), but the overall failure rate of the system depends on many more factors than that - if there's a software bug at a higher layer, the system as a whole might not replicate correctly, or might delete something it thought was replicated, only to find out later that it's not.

      I doubt they have any idea what the real, total MTBF for the entire mess is.

      --
      A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  41. what have they been hyped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sometimes hype is just that

  42. Wuala is a decent service, but not the only one by Nel_IT · · Score: 1

    I am really sorry to hear that. I have been using Wuala for about a year and I can say it was just fine for my needs. However, I have also been using other cloud services that are highly focused on security, such as pCloud and Tresorit, and I'd like to say, those are very good as well. On one hand, in Tresorit security is the one and only priority, which is very good because I store a lot of sensitive data. On the other hand, pCloud is just as secure as Tresorit, but is a lot more user friendly, and is suitable for regular users as well. Plus, pCloud is more affordable, which, in my view, is an important benefit. So, I personally don't worry about my files right now.

  43. Cloud apps come and go....so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cloud applications have come and gone. They have been bought out by other companies and changed their policies on retention practices (I'm staring at you Microsoft/Hotmail), services have been discontinued (looking at you Yahoo pipes) like in this article.

    So, what can you do to protect yourself - particularly for your archived backup data?

    1. If you don't have a lot of money - and you have a friend who is reasonably trustworthy:
        a) buy a lock box
        b) buy two external drives (Terabyte or better size).
        c) plug one into your computer, and put the other one in the lock box.
        d) deliver the lock box offsite to your trustworthy friend's house.
        e) set up your backups to go to the external drive - preferably encrypted.
        f) swap out the drives in the lockbox periodically.
        * if you are concerned about incremental backups between the time you swap the external drives, you could use a high capacity USB stick to capture incremental backups - and put that in your pocket ever time you leave the house.

    In the event of a house fire, you would have your last offsite backups at your friend's house, and any incrementals in your pocket.

    If you have slightly more money - you could simply set up your own server at a hosting service (e.g. Rackspace et al) - and make that your 'cloud'. As someone mentioned - this may only be feasible if you also upgrade your network to have enough bandwidth to handle the expected load. Of course, If all I have to worry about are incremental backups after and initial full backup (and maybe you only do a full backup infrequently after that) - then it might be doable (set up the backup to kick off when your system is largely idle - e.g. 2am - assuming you're not a nightowl...)

    On the other hand, if you have a large amount of disposable income, you might consider using offsite services such as Iron Mountain etc - to do all the legwork of taking your backup drives offsite and storing them and so on.

    Problem solved.

    In the interests of full disclosure - my personal risk assessment determined that the largest threat to my data was in the form of disk crashes - which distributing multiple copies of the data around my own network sufficed. In the event of a fire, the plan is to grab the external backup disk, the CD sleve, the mac mini (all of which I can carry under one arm), and bail. However, if you need more protection than that - the above should work for you.

  44. Re: once again: the CLOUD is NOT by allo · · Score: 1

    scalable: free surplus storage (unencrypted) if you click here*.

    * this button will unencrypt ALL your data