Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Project Working on Immersive Displays (Video)

Yes, it's 3-D, and works with the Firefox browser. But that's not all. The MozVR virtual reality system is not just for Firefox, and it can incorporate infrared and other sensors to give a more complete picture than can be derived from visible light alone. In theory, the user's (client) computer needs no special hardware beyond a decent GPU and an Oculus Rift headset. Everything else lives on a server.

Is this the future of consumer displays? Even if not, the development is fun to watch, which you can start doing at mozvr.com -- and if you're serious about learning about this project you may want to read our interview transcript in addition to watching the video, because the transcript contains additional information.

47 comments

  1. Priorities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla seems to spend a lot of effort on things that have nothing to do with fixing their increasingly bad browser....

    1. Re:Priorities? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Is this the future of consumer displays?

      Betteridges Law: No. Even more so because it's another time-and-money-wasting Mozilla distraction from doing something useful with no future.

    2. Re:Priorities? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Who would want to use a display underwater, anyway?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. VRML is dead! Long live VRML!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VRML is dead! Long live VRML!!

    OK, ok, I know that's not what it's about, but a man can dream...

  3. New UI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hot damn! Does this mean that Firefox is finally getting a new UI? The current one is so last week.

    1. Re:New UI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.a.com

    2. Re:New UI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a a

  4. It's alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VRML LIVES

  5. Nice and all by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    But can you making a fucking browser that isn't bloated and runs faster than Chrome?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Nice and all by narcc · · Score: 1

      They've already done that.

    2. Re:Nice and all by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Yes they did, at the beginning. And then the bloat crawled back in and this research about immersive displays just proves it.

    3. Re:Nice and all by narcc · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

    4. Re:Nice and all by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      How is multi thread and multi process support going? Do I still have to enable this beta feature through about:config?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    5. Re:Nice and all by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nonsense to your nonsense. nahnahnahnah.

      Great technical debate we've had here. But your argument fails on ... .well content. In the mean time I'm going to keep using Chrome. I try every new Firefox release when it comes out to see if it's bearable but ultimately it fails on UI responsiveness to the point of frustration.

    6. Re:Nice and all by narcc · · Score: 1

      Odd, I've had the same experience, but with Chrome.

      Ignoring subjective experience for the moment, the question was to how bloated and performant each was in relation to the other. In that case, the victor is clear. I'll put hard data ahead of wishes and good feelings any day.

      But your argument fails on ... .well content.

      I thought it was fair. His comment was nonsense. Quibble if you want, that's fine, but keep in mind that WebVR is not only included in FF Nightly, but Chrome experimental builds as well. Not only is his point irrelevant, it's meaningless to distinguish between the two browsers on that basis as both of them are building implementations of the same fledgling specification.

      His comment was both irrelevant and misleading. I think my one-word reply sums that up nicely.

    7. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll put hard data ahead of wishes and good feelings any day.

      Then if you go beyond that extremely limited link you quoted you will find:

      SunSpider: Edge wins!

      Octane: Chrome wins!

      Kraken: Chrome wins!

      JetStream: Chrome wins!

      Oort Online: Chrome wins!

      Peacekeeper: Firefox wins!

      WebXPRT: Chrome wins!

      HTML5Test: Chrome wins!

        http://venturebeat.com/2015/07/13/benchmarking-beta-browsers-chrome-vs-firefox-vs-edge/

    8. Re:Nice and all by narcc · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long it took you to find contradictory figures. Naturally, they benchmark beta versions and not the final releases. I guess it takes a lot of effort to make chrome look good, eh?

    9. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how long it took you to find contradictory figures.

      Its just a simple google search.

      Naturally, they benchmark beta versions and not the final releases.

      Here's one with final releases:


      Kraken: Chrome wins!

      Octane: Chrome wins!

      Peacekeeper: Firefox wins!

      WebXPRT: Firefox wins!

      HTML5Test: Chrome wins!

      http://www.tekrevue.com/spartan-benchmarks-ie-chrome-firefox-opera/

      But it doesnt matter that much because you will come up with excuses for its failures anyway. Stop lying to yourself, usage is at an all-time low, user satisfaction is at an all-time low and at best it trades places with Chrome on benchmarks. Wake up for fuck sake. People are pointing this out because they dont want Firefox to fail but you ignore it because you *do* want Firefox to fail or you just want to pretend you are perfect and everybody else is wrong.

    10. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Keep yelling "Nonsense" on slashdot. That'll avert bankruptcy for you guys, sure.

    11. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is obviously employed by Mozilla.

      The not so ironic thing is that his hubris - and his idea of addressing problems with his browser is to yell "Nonsense" at people - will ensure that his paychecks will stop in the near future.

  6. Intrusive ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ad shows 100% of time. But there is an audio track of a guy (apparently Indian).

    Sorry, not against ads, but I'd like to see the images, too... and, yes, I'm using Firefox. :-\

  7. People like you are destroying Firefox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sorry, son, you're the one who's full of shit in this matter.

    Firefox's share of the market is plummeting because people are unhappy with it. It's likely under 10% at this point, across all platforms. IE 11 and Safari for iOS each almost have more users than Firefox does in total. Chrome for Android has far more. Even Opera Mini almost has as many users as Firefox does!

    Fuck, even Mozilla's own Firefox satisfaction numbers show that its users don't like it. Over 80% of Firefox users are unhappy with it! That's an unbelievably bad rating, regardless of product and industry. Even the most despised politicians rarely see such poor satisfaction levels.

    It's your kind of attitude that's directly responsible for what's happening to Firefox. Firefox's few remaining users are very clearly saying that there are some severe problems. Yet instead of doing the sensible thing and listening to these users and considering what they're saying, we have people like you who just deny that there are any problems.

    While you and other Firefox advocates are spewing out denial, these long-standing bugs, performance issues, and idiotic changes remain unfixed. Each day some more of Firefox's remaining users will finally give up, and move to some other browser. Since no new users are bothering to use Firefox due to these problems, Firefox's market share dwindles.

    Eventually it will get to the point that there are so few Firefox users that nobody will care what Mozilla thinks. After all, Mozilla's revenue and influence are only possible due to the size of its user base. But when Firefox has next to no users, nobody will do lucrative Firefox search deals with Mozilla, depriving them of their funding. Nobody involved with the standardization of web technologies will listen to them. Mozilla will go from being a respected, innovative organization to a totally irrelevant organization.

    Personally, I don't want to see that happen. But thanks to people like you, and a complete lack of sensible action from Mozilla, I fear we're seeing the decline of Firefox and Mozilla getting closer every single day.

    1. Re:People like you are destroying Firefox. by exomondo · · Score: 2

      You don't really think they are going to acknowledge their problems do you? It's easier to just keep the blinders on and say "the only things that matter are the things we say matter". Yes their marketshare is in the toilet, yes their own satisfaction numbers confirm people don't like it but they will just point to the strong points that nobody cares about and call all criticism "nonsense" instead. User-hostile companies like that deserve to die the slow death that Mozilla is dying unless they get in touch with reality and realize that they have no idea what their users really want.

    2. Re:People like you are destroying Firefox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a browser built by an independent not for profit organization that cares about my security, not the security of the earnings of the shareholders
      a browser that works reasonably well and that I can customise or/and increase it usefulness by the keeping it open so developers can built interesting stuff I may want to use

      I use Firefox
      I am fine with you not using it, but don't ask me to trust the comments of somebody that fist fuck himself so he can produce comments of his own arse as if they where absolute truths

    3. Re:People like you are destroying Firefox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >I want a browser built by an independent not for profit organization

      Mozilla is not independent, they were wholly dependent on Google and are now wholly dependent on Yahoo. Is that something you didn't know or are you just being ignorant?

      >that cares about my security, not the security of the earnings of the shareholders

      You actually think they care more about your security than their own earnings or that of their sponsors? Firefox is certainly not a standout in terms of security.

      >a browser that works reasonably well and that I can customise or/and increase it usefulness by the keeping it open so developers can built interesting stuff I may want to use

      All open source browsers (many derived from Firefox or Chromuim) do that and aren't tied directly to Mozilla which is in turn tied to Yahoo and dependent on Yahoo's revenues to keep it afloat.

      >I use Firefox

      So in addition to Mozilla not knowing what users want, the few users it does have don't know that Firefox isn't what they want.

    4. Re:People like you are destroying Firefox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Independent? Not for profit? Mozilla made 300+ million in revenue last year, 90% of Google. They aren't independent, the are dependent on Google (or Yahoo) for revenue. They are making massive profit too. Their non-profit status should be taken away.

    5. Re:People like you are destroying Firefox. by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Fuck, even Mozilla's own Firefox satisfaction numbers [mozilla.org] show that its users don't like it. Over 80% of Firefox users are unhappy with it! That's an unbelievably bad rating, regardless of product and industry. Even the most despised politicians rarely see such poor satisfaction levels.

      Holy fsck, I don't know how mutable the figures on that link are but when I looked just now it was 89% dissatisfaction (7-day average). That's... astounding, I knew people are pissed off at it (put me firmly in the 89% bracket) but if you're in charge of a project where nearly 90% of your users think you're doing a crap job, then you need to be fired and replaced by someone who can move the project forward. Or, better yet, killed and eaten to prevent you from passing on the genes.

    6. Re:People like you are destroying Firefox. by narcc · · Score: 1

      When you look at how that figure was derived, it's far less astonishing.

    7. Re:People like you are destroying Firefox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you spent as much time making software as you do making excuses then maybe you would have a decent product instead of one which barely anybody uses and most of those who do use it don't particularly like it.

  8. Television watches you by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    Call me an old onion-belt but I just don't get it. How is waving my hands around like an idiot in front of my computer... how is that immersive? VR, I understand. A wearable display, that's immersive because I'm not looking at everything else in the room. Hand tracking, that's immersive because it replaces typing with more natural movement. But none of that works without a full VR system. Put hand tracking on a normal laptop or desktop and you have yet another input device doomed to failure because it does the same thing with more effort.

    This is just a huge stinking pile of feeping creaturitus,

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Television watches you by hodet · · Score: 1

      Nods in agreement. Adjusts own onion belt.

  9. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just downloaded Nightly and the VR addon.

    Hooked up my DK2 and the Leap Motion sensor.

    It crashed mozilla instantly. Every single time. I tried everything and all it does is crashing.

    All on W8.1 x64.

    Please don't announce things like they work if they fucking don't.

  10. They could be death convulsions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We may be getting to the point where Mozilla, as an organization, is suffering from death throes.

    As an organization, maybe they know that Firefox, their only successful product, is on its way out. It's being rejected by the market. The changes Mozilla has made to it over the past several years have been near-universally despised, and their competitors have been getting better and better. Nobody wants to use Firefox when they can get a much better experience by using Chrome, Safari, and even modern versions of IE.

    Maybe they also know that none of their other efforts have seen much success. Firefox OS is a total failure. Thunderbird has pretty much been abandoned. Firefox for Android and Persona have been ignored. Rust took forever to get a 1.0 release out, and we're already seeing the hype surrounding it pretty much die off completely, now that people realize it isn't all that useful and that C++ is still a better choice. Servo is a toy, at best. Bugzilla is a relic. Let's Encrypt keeps getting delayed, from "Summer 2015" to "Mid-2015" to "September 2015" to "Q4 2015" as of today.

    Then there are the political shenanigans, like how they ganged up on Brendan Eich. Nobody should have to lose his job, voluntarily or involuntarily, and regardless of his sexual orientation, merely because of his beliefs regarding marriage. I don't know what came of it, but I also remember hearing about some executive there getting worked up about some comments that were posted at reddit from an alleged Mozilla employee.

    So amid this uncertainty, we see organizational flailing. We see them grasping here and there, trying to remain relevant. Yet this clearly isn't working, because of the lack of focus, and because all of this flailing totally ignores what current and potential users actually want and need.

    I think it would be a shame if Mozilla became irrelevant like, say, Netscape did. But then again, maybe that wouldn't be such a bad thing. Maybe it would allow them the rebirth they need. A return to their earlier days, when they produced actually-usable versions of Firefox, instead of spinning their wheels endlessly like they seem to be doing these days.

    1. Re:They could be death convulsions. by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I think it would be a shame if Mozilla became irrelevant like, say, Netscape did. But then again, maybe that wouldn't be such a bad thing. Maybe it would allow them the rebirth they need. A return to their earlier days, when they produced actually-usable versions of Firefox, instead of spinning their wheels endlessly like they seem to be doing these days.

      If we're lucky, some disenchanted ex-Mozilla folks could fork the browser, strip out the layer upon layer of crud that's been larded onto it, and take it back to what it should have been, a cool, lightweight, user-extensible browser. It'd be like a rebirth. They could call the project... oh, I dunno, how about Phoenix?

    2. Re:They could be death convulsions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palemoon is functional and already has layers of crap stripped.

    3. Re:They could be death convulsions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When an organization becomes successful it has money. When there's money, people show up who want to make more money. When an organization doesn't have money, they people there are working a labor of love. The two forces produce completely different products. Mozilla as a for-profit corporation needs to go bankrupt to get the blood sucking leeches to detach and go look for money elsewhere. This will leave the people who just want to make a good browser that stays true to the promise of an Internet where the user is in control.

  11. Fix the bugs and bloat in Firefox by kbg · · Score: 2

    Fix the damn fucking browser first, before doing any pet projects.

    1. Re:Fix the bugs and bloat in Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if more people who were good at working on browser cores were available, I'm sure they would do just that. Until then, the people who aren't as good at that can safely work on other projects, and will try to get interns up to speed in the hopes that they don't run away screaming from all of that code.

  12. Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...the user's (client) computer needs no special hardware beyond a decent GPU and an Oculus Rift headset."

    So in other words the client computer requires no special hardware, except the special hardware.

    This statement might sound a bit less ridiculous if it worked with Google Cardboard...

    https://www.google.com/get/cardboard/

  13. Tell me it's an optional plugin... by Chas · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    If Mozilla wants to do other projects, GREAT.

    But stop trying to fold in every half-assed pseudo-plugin into the browser! Allow people the ability to install AT WILL, rather than forcing people to fuck around with your buggy, unstable alpha code!

    This is why Mozilla was born in the first place! Bloat in Netscape!

    And, while you're at it, get someone developing Mozilla who actually BELIEVES in developing Mozilla. Not re-jiggering Mozilla to look and act like Chrome because you've got a hard-on for Chrome and want to fondle the Google cock.

    Because the current leadership at Mozilla has exactly ZERO interest in continued development and bugfixing of their flagship product.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Tell me it's an optional plugin... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Damn I wish I had mod points to mod stuff like this up. Everone involved in (mis-)managing Mozilla should be required to read the contents of this discussion (although I doubt it'll help, sigh).

  14. Ironic, or telling? by Chatsubo · · Score: 1

    I can't watch this video in Firefox.

    --
    > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
    1. Re:Ironic, or telling? by narcc · · Score: 1

      It works find in FireFox. Considering it's a flash video, I'd say the problem is on your end.

    2. Re:Ironic, or telling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash? Jesus.

  15. Display by Mozilla? Do. Not. Want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there ever was a time for the return of the "whatcouldpossiblygowrong" tag, this is it.

  16. No: Re: They could be death convulsions. by sdw · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird is still the best email reader by far. I have many gigabytes of email in 10+ accounts all easily and quickly available on all machines. The editing experience, especially inline threaded replies, is the best. Outlook is a joke here.

    And, at least for a power user, Firefox is still the best browser. I commonly have hundreds of tabs open, up to 700+. Only Firefox handles that gracefully, remembers all of them with all of their history, and, at least after a restart, uses a reasonable amount of memory. And with Nightly, now it's multithreaded which is starting to get interesting.

    On desktop, Firefox has about equal share to IE and just under half of Chrome. Not terrible. Hopefully they will take IE's share. ;-)

    --
    Stephen D. Williams