Slashdot Mirror


Paris Data Center Not Too Noisy, After All (datacenterdynamics.com)

judgecorp writes: A Paris court has ruled that a suburban data center can continue to operate, reversing an earlier decision to close it down after protests from residents. The data center's owner, Interxion, cited noise impact studies form 2014 which showed the site was operating within authorized limits, and also within the levels it predicted in its planning application

77 comments

  1. That was quick by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Don't court cases normally take months if not years to appeal?

    1. Re: That was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the country, of course.

    2. Re:That was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Follow the money. EuroDollarPounds will always expedite a process when there's more money on one side than the other.

      The sad fact of this matter is this new DC makes more noise than what was present, a clear backward step. Regardless of the industry, the planners should be aiming for a higher standard from everyone. There's no reason why a DC needs to make any noise outside the building itself.

    3. Re:That was quick by davester666 · · Score: 0

      Yes, there is a REALLY good reason why the datacenter makes a bunch of noise. It costs a whole bunch of money to reduce the noise.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:That was quick by VVelox · · Score: 1

      Follow the money. EuroDollarPounds will always expedite a process when there's more money on one side than the other.

      The sad fact of this matter is this new DC makes more noise than what was present, a clear backward step. Regardless of the industry, the planners should be aiming for a higher standard from everyone. There's no reason why a DC needs to make any noise outside the building itself.

      Silent HVAC? So basically a miracle then?

      HVAC is a standard minor background noise for any modern urban setting. It is no noisier for a DC than it is any generic office building.

    5. Re:That was quick by wilhil6128 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not really... My brother lived for a year in a tower block next to the Level 3 data centre in London... The noise was so bad during the summer - a full huge roof with so many AC units. I can't tell you how loud it was, but, you don't want to live near them by choice... If you move to the area after, fair enough... but, if they are built later, it is certainly bad. My brother moved in during the winter and didn't notice at all - it was only during the summer it became a problem.

    6. Re:That was quick by _merlin · · Score: 2

      It's the sound of backup generator testing that the residents have complained about.

    7. Re:That was quick by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Erm, what is HVAC supposed to mean? No idea if it could be silent ;D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:That was quick by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Heating, ventilation, air conditioning

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    9. Re:That was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe inventing a material that absorbs noise until it can no longer be noticed and that is cheaper than bribing local officials will make one inventor a very rich asshole. He could drive his V8 bi turbo powered vehicle, covered with his own invention and complain about his neighbors noisy electric vehicle.

    10. Re:That was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Silent HVAC? So basically a miracle then?

      HVAC is a standard minor background noise for any modern urban setting. It is no noisier for a DC than it is any generic office building.

      The amount of noise produced HVAC system is to tied to the amount of heat it needs to remove. Since a DC produces probably 10 times the heat as a average office building. It without a doubt produces much more noise, unless special care is taken to suppress the extra noise.

    11. Re:That was quick by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Since a DC produces probably 10 times the heat as a average office building. It without a doubt produces much more noise, unless special care is taken to suppress the extra noise.

      10 times the heat probably translates to only a few decibels of extra sound power, and less difference than that in sound pressure at the lot line, if they do it right.
      Anyway, the complaints were about the noisy backup generators, not the HVAC.

    12. Re:That was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build a more houses and put more families in them. There will be more noise than there was prior. So noone should be able to ever move in.

  2. But stinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of BO.

    1. Re: But stinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your Americans ignorance is prefered.

    2. Re: But stinky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my head you said that in the Pepe Le Pew voice and I was entertained. Thanks!

  3. STRIKE! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they'll go on strike over this.

    Oh, hang on - it's in Montreuil - nobody has a job there anyway.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:STRIKE! by hughbar · · Score: 1

      More to the point, Montreuil is full of poor people, some of them communists (it used to have a communist mairie, as I recall?), so they can **** off.

      I would guess the people in work are probably on shifts as well, so they won't want the rattle of AC and possibly standby generators. However 'industry' usually wins these things now, as in the UK and aircraft noise. If it's 'growth' we now no longer care about quality of life. Sad that this attitude has come to France, but it's on the edge of Paris, not really 'la France profonde'.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    2. Re:STRIKE! by Milvuss · · Score: 2

      Montreuil has a lot a gentrification currently going on. So, even if there still quite a lot of poor people, and a huge Malian community, there is also more and more wealthy people there. And quite a lot of jobs too, with all the offices of BNP Paribas.

      But, in fact, it's not really relevant here, Montreuil is where the court is, not the datacenter. The later is in La Courneuve. I know less well this city, but there it seems there is also quite a lot of gentrification and (new) jobs there.

    3. Re:STRIKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The place is located on a border of a major industrial area and surrounded by highways.

      I wonder what was the measured noise level if it caused a protest - there obviously was quite a lot of noise even without that DC.

    4. Re:STRIKE! by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Yes, thanks, La Corneuve is a long way from the Mairie de Montreuil. This is my old department, le neuf-trois, an epicentre of fun and disorder. Not surprised that the populace are being subjected to something that wouldn't be acceptable in 75016 or 75008 for example.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    5. Re:STRIKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget that Ubisoft head office is on Montreuil too! (even if it's not relevant)

    6. Re:STRIKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why the French even pretend to work anymore. Between taking month-long vacations, taking every opportunity to strike or protest, and generally acting like they're doing their employer a favor by even showing up for a few hours a week, it's truly amazing that economy works at all.

    7. Re:STRIKE! by jbengt · · Score: 1

      The place is located on a border of a major industrial area and surrounded by highways.
      I wonder what was the measured noise level if it caused a protest - there obviously was quite a lot of noise even without that DC.

      A lot of times, it's the tonality of the noise that is irritating. The issue is not necessarily the full spectrum total noise level that most noise ordinances regulate, even if it is weighted like dBA.

    8. Re:STRIKE! by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Not always. Auto race tracks that have been operating for decades are told to enforce sound limits or shut down completely because some new development opened 5 years ago nearby.

      But on the flip side, no one wants airplane noise, but everyone wants to benefit from being within 30 minutes of an international airport and getting their package from the other end of the country in 2 days. That doesn't happen by truck or train. So, lots of hypicrisy and NIMBY thinking, and an industry standing up to some of these complaints is akin to a parent telling a child that something is good for them, even if it doesn't seem to be.

    9. Re:STRIKE! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Realistically, lots of people benefit from the airport, but considerably fewer have major noise problems. NIMBY is a reasonable response sometimes. Many people moved into the flight area before the local airport got lots more busy and opened another runway, and really didn't expect the noise they got.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Noise source by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Regardless of the industry, the planners should be aiming for a higher standard from everyone.

    In theory, they should. In practice: they aim for whatever minimal effort that still manage to passes at what they law requires.

    There's no reason why a DC needs to make any noise outside the building itself.

    Air conditionning.
    A data center generates heat. Which needs to be extracted, which means that there's some heat exchange process that is external to the building.
    And the datacenter constructor probably went for the cheapest possible that still pass the law instead of the best.

    Also, a data center generates quite some noise indoor (fans and spinning disks of all the machines) and it wouldn't be surprising if the constructor only went for the cheapest minimal building noise insulation that still passes the law's requirement.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Noise source by Aereus · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the cheap solution to this be to build "highway sound barriers" around those units to X height to dampen the noise levels until they're at such a height that they don't impact the surrounding area as much?

    2. Re:Noise source by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Better solution would be the reflect the sound up and away, which is how highway sound barriers work. They either reflect the sound back within the corridor, or they're installed on a slight angle that reflects the sound away. The same solution would probably help in this case. The other option of course would be to use geothermal taps to cool, of course people would likely also throw a NIMBY hissy fit. An example of that would be a waste to energy plant in a nearby city, it produced electricity, and water used to cool parts of the plant from the high heat during incineration were then pumped to a nearby large hospital complex(4 hospitals all within a stones throw, including a sick kids, and two standard hospitals and a long-term care hospital). NIMBYs threw a hissy fit because it was burning garbage in their backyard. However, ever since it was shut down the now ship garbage to a giant open air garbage dump that you can smell 3-5km away.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Noise source by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      They should have used the excess heat to provide district heating to their neighbours - a lot become tolerable when you're cashing in.

    4. Re:Noise source by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      You mean the data center? I doubt it produces so much excess heat that it is worth it.
      Anyway: consider the uproar that after or while building the dc all sourrounding streets are opened to lay pipes, the uproar when all potential customers houses and cellars get reworked for those pipes consider the uproar when rents are rising: see you have the new heating system ... with all that compfort you surely like to pay more?
      On top of that: it would take ages to integrate that into an already existing city. (On top of that again: we are talking about Paris ...)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re: Noise source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Anyway: consider the uproar that after or while building the dc all sourrounding streets are opened to lay pipes, the uproar when all potential customers houses and cellars get reworked for those pipes consider the uproar when rents are rising..."

      And then imagine it in a whiny French accent... Really you forgot the worst part...

    6. Re:Noise source by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      The government data center that I worked in was linked up to a bunch of others which dumped the heat into local river. Worked well except there was a couple of days we had to shut down because a boat dropped its anchor on the discharge pipe into the river damaging it.

      I always thought we should have at least used the heat from the data center to create hot water for the building before sending it away to the cooling plant. It would have cost almost nothing for the building to run. Just a little bit of electricity to transfer the heat from our pipes to their tank and they could have saved quite a bit on natural gas.

    7. Re:Noise source by jbengt · · Score: 1

      You mean the data center? I doubt it produces so much excess heat that it is worth it.

      It's not so much the amount of heat, it's that the temperature differential is too small to be very useful for much.

    8. Re:Noise source by jbengt · · Score: 1

      "Highway sound barriers" are not cheap, and good planning, probably using more sophisticated sound barriers, would be needed to be very effective.

    9. Re:Noise source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those barriers block airflow, you generally want as open an airflow as possible to heat exchangers. Sure its not going to stop them from working (as the heat will rise out of the area), but it will impact their efficiency considerably.

  5. Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the residents are protesting and the plant is within regulation, the regulations allow too much noise. If the datacenter was "not too noisy after all" then nobody would have complained/protested.

    1. Re:Misleading headline by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the datacenter was "not too noisy after all" then nobody would have complained/protested.

      For some people any perceptible change in noise it too much noise. That is a subjective standard. The area is probably zoned for a certain noise level and seems to be within that objective standard.

    2. Re:Misleading headline by khchung · · Score: 2

      If the datacenter was "not too noisy after all" then nobody would have complained/protested.

      For some people any perceptible change in noise it too much noise.

      Worse, for some people with hidden agenda, even imperceptible noise is too much noise.

      It wouldn't be hard for budding politician to make an issue out of nothing and come out "for the neighborhood" as a knight in shining armor driving away a "noisy datacenter", and then appearing for the next election nearby. These things happen all the time where ever there are local elections.

      --
      Oliver.
    3. Re:Misleading headline by X-chan · · Score: 2

      This is France, we're famous for protesting and going on strike for about everything under the sun.

      That said, while I can't judge this specific case, the noise overall in Paris is bad. Of course you eventually get used to it and you phase it out, but I don't know how I'd live without double glazing. Nothing to do with datacenters, just cars and other motorized vehicules. So anything that add extra noise on top of it is not going to be welcomed by residents.

    4. Re:Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the residents are protesting and the plant is within regulation, the regulations allow too much noise.

      We've had people complaining from headaches caused by a cell tower.. which was never switched on.
      So I would not take people protests as a consistent sign that regulations must be changed. These protests sometimes just mean that something HAS changed.

    5. Re: Misleading headline by Stewie241 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would be more concerned about the extra radiation from the DC rather than the sound.

      Whenever I see networking WiFi equipment I get headaches. I couldn't imagine having to see a DC all the time. I'd be able to feel myself getting cancer.

    6. Re:Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody chose that 'objective' standard. Just because it's a number it's not objective. Residents not understanding that they live in an area zoned for more noise than they bargained for is what's really going on.

    7. Re: Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you also get headaches when you don't see the WiFi equipment?

    8. Re:Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except of course its zoned for a subjective standard and the increase is objective

    9. Re: Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or when he/she sees a "box" that looks like Wifi equipment.

      There have been DOZENS of double blind studies with people claiming WiFi "sensitivity". So far, I haven't heard of a single case of a person actually being able to detect if WiFi is present.

    10. Re: Misleading headline by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee you that I can detect if WiFi is present or not. Using my iPhone, I go into Settings, Network...

      Fight for your bitcoins!

    11. Re:Misleading headline by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I also couldn't live without double glazing. Of course for me it's all about donuts, so...

      Fight for your bitcoins!

    12. Re: Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we had someone at work complain about this one day. I turned off the LED (not the WAP) and told them it was off, and they haven't had an issue since.

      Those damned LEDs!

    13. Re: Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, when your in Best Buy, the hundred of WiFi units setting on the shelf must render you catatonic.

    14. Re:Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like instead they have residential zoning too close to this commercial zone.

    15. Re: Misleading headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol thanks for the laugh... "I get headaches when around wifi..." You must have a headache full time them, wifi is everywhere.. unless you live in the us United States National Radio Quiet Zone.

      You and Saul's bro went full retard

    16. Re:Misleading headline by marciot · · Score: 1

      We've had people complaining from headaches caused by a cell tower.. which was never switched on.
      So I would not take people protests as a consistent sign that regulations must be changed. These protests sometimes just mean that something HAS changed.

      According to Wikipedia, even the Eiffel Tower was highly objected to when it was first proposed. Here is the petition, which is quite fun to read, in retrospect:

      "We, writers, painters, sculptors, architects and passionate devotees of the hitherto untouched beauty of Paris, protest with all our strength, with all our indignation in the name of slighted French taste, against the erection ... of this useless and monstrous Eiffel Tower ... To bring our arguments home, imagine for a moment a giddy, ridiculous tower dominating Paris like a gigantic black smokestack, crushing under its barbaric bulk Notre Dame, the Tour Saint-Jacques, the Louvre, the Dome of les Invalides, the Arc de Triomphe, all of our humiliated monuments will disappear in this ghastly dream. And for twenty years ... we shall see stretching like a blot of ink the hateful shadow of the hateful column of bolted sheet metal."

    17. Re:Misleading headline by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Was it Dumas that said he liked to do his writing in a restaurant in the Eiffel Tower, because it was the only place in town where he couldn't see the thing?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    18. Re:Misleading headline by marciot · · Score: 1

      Was it Dumas that said he liked to do his writing in a restaurant in the Eiffel Tower, because it was the only place in town where he couldn't see the thing?

      Guy de Maupassant, according to the same wikipedia article.

    19. Re:Misleading headline by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Or they are just a bunch of people that like to complain.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    20. Re: Misleading headline by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!
      Warning! You have no sense of whimsy.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    21. Re:Misleading headline by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      So what kind of zoning should be between the residential and commercial zoning? You will find that commercial zones abut residential zones pretty much everywhere.

    22. Re:Misleading headline by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Thanks - I couldn't remember the author.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  6. Note : 2014 by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Roughly after the start of it. That means at that time it could indeed have a low noise during the study. The question is not whether it did respect the law back then, but what is the noise assessment today, and whether the fuel tank are properly secured. But i am not surprise the appeal court overturned the decision. Stopping the center and withdrawing allowance was stupid. In such a case you do a study first and recommend measure to stop or lower the noise. You don#t stop the shit out of the company.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  7. arf by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    La Courneuve is a relatively poor area near (not in) Paris. If this were in, say, Neuilly-sur-Seine, which is also near (not in) Paris but happens to house, among others, former president Nicolas Sarkozy, it would never have been built to start with.

    La Courneuve Wiki
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Neuilly Wiki
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    1. Re:arf by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Ils devraient renommer ça "La Courvieille". Then again pretty much everything in France is old, so my point is moot.

      Fight for your bitcoins!

  8. I sympathize with the residents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The issue with noise is that is very subjective and i can see why the locals are upset.
    Their street was probably very quiet and now it probably a constant humm, day and night.
    it doesn't have to by loud, 50-60 db, witch is probably within legal limits, but never the less can be annoying.
    I can give you an example: I've recently moved from one end of an apartment building to the other, 100m or so away.
    The building is parallel to a noisy street but one end is closer to a stop so cars begin to stop there and the noise is a little lower, the difference becomes more a noticeable at night and means now I don't sleep as good a before.
    Another example: perpendicular to the building is the HVAC system from a Mall located 25 meters away, again it is within limits, and during the day the apartments facing it have now problem because the street noise is greater, but at night it's annoying and instead of a peaceful night they have to listen to the buzz if they don't what to close the windows.
    Seen from outside, just by looking at numbers, the people's demands might seem absurd, but for the ones affected could by like the Chinese dropping, because is non stop.

    1. Re:I sympathize with the residents by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Planning and zoning get some. Idiots keep on trying to build walkable cities but do not understand that means everybody is living right next to commercial space.

      I live in a nice suburban town nearly all the industry is on the other side of a hill we can not hear anything short of an explosion . It's realy not that hard residential next to light commercial and industrial/heavy commercial past that with the highway past them. High open space vs building zoning means we have buffers not lots that amount to parking and building with little else. So we end up with neighborhoods surrounded by school, churches, deli's barber shops etc on the main road larger business on the other side and industry behind them.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  9. Recycling waste heat: meanwhile in CH by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Meanwhile, Geneva (Switzerland) successfully managed to build a floating swimming pool in the lake that is heated by the waste heat of cooling loops of the nearby hotels.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Recycling waste heat: meanwhile in CH by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      How do they heat it in the copious winters when the hotels presumably don't generate waste heat?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  10. Simple. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    If the datacentre came along AFTER the residences were built and populated, and if the majority of local residents say it's too noisy, then it IS too noisy. Never mind 'authorized limits', planning applications, and the like.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their complaints appear to be centered around the emergency generators, which I highly doubt are ran more than a day or so a year (tests, power outages, etc). Next these people will be complaining about the smell from the repaving taking place one road over every few years, or (other peoples) garbage trucks driving down the road once a week.

    2. Re:Simple. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness things don't work that way. If the majority of people didn't want a cafe with a large gay clientele should they boot that out?
      So you want everyone to be subject to the voting of the local community?
      You are the flipside of the extreme libertarian view of "you can do anything you want on your property".
      Both plans are terrible.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  11. night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won't hear a data center scream during the day, during the hustle and bustle of the busy french suburb.

    But in the still of the, dark, lonely, french, suburb, night... It's maddening. Tick tick, tock. Tick tick, tock. Tick tick, tock. Goes your clock.

    But behind that... an evil hum, so pervasive, operating on so many frequencies, and harmonics, it penetrates thick walls, pillowed ears, and designer marble flooring. Yet it's not white noise. Indeed, it's very dark noise.

    The residents become slowly perturbed, sleepless, and profoundly psychologically bent.

    Then it happens.

    1. Re:night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and profoundly psychologically bent.

      A lot of French are of that persuasion

  12. Caveat Emptor Re:That was quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caveat Emptor.

    That is latin for "In capitalistic oligarchy, you are fucked."

  13. Coren22 proven a LYING "signature boy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "APK doesn't think that DNS servers are worth running and seems to believe that somehow Microsoft Active Directory can run without DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:58PM (#50811615)

    Where'd I say AD will run minus DNS Coren22? I've said AD = internal network DNS dependent as far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    (Searching this in BOLD "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers!" referring to OpenDNS suggestions for those using AD stupid in the POSTS BEFORE IT in my security guides for users (geared to stand alone single machines no less), & right there on that page proves it stupid - so even if you posted as myself someplace here on /. "impersonating me", I have your ass NOW, shithead!)

    I've also stated MANY TIMES I use remote DNS in OpenDNS @ home (but not @ work on AD networks + exchange/outlook: Free OpenDNS model doesn't work with AD dependent Exchange + Outlook specifically you lying little imbecile).

    I also don't hardcode in "every site there is under the sun" is why, so I have to use DNS, but OpenDNS & rarely.

    I also RARELY MISS A LOOKUP since I put where I spend a good 95++% of my time online in my favorite sites into hosts @ the TOP of hosts for utmost LOCAL FASTER RESOLUTION SPEEDS and more reliability vs. Open DNS (not OpenDNS) resolvers being abused, Kaminsky redirect poisoned DNS servers (of which 99.999% of ISP DNS are not proofed against to this very day even though a patch exists which OpenDNS uses), rogue DNS servers, and yes ROUTERS with bushwhacked by malware DNS settings (happening a LOT lately).

    Hardcodes in hosts are faster than remote DNS, waste less resources than local dns in power, cpu cycles, RAM, & other I/O by FAR considering ALL THE PARTS of such a setup in programs, data, I/O, & power (especially if setup as a separate machine).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a disgusting liar... apk

  14. Coren22 "security guru" wannabe fails security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU say "hosts=bad" (but they add security, speed, & reliability) & bitch on admin privelege to UPDATE vs. threats:

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    Hypocrite - You use admin priv admitting it

    &

    How else can I programmatically update hosts minus it in Windows?

    ---

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    You FINALLY later admit there's no other way!

    FACT:

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware (best one) DEMANDS you use admin privelege (you saying it's "bad" too?) it can't do its job fully otherwise, like many security tools do!

    ---

    Aryeh Goretsky NOD32/ESET says hosts = good security-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Oliver Day (Symantec) does-> http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts hosts & recommends my APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit-> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    ---

    * HOW MANY SECURITY PROS DO I NEED TO KNOCK THE CHOCOLATE OUTTA YOU?

    ---

    Those security pros INCLUDE me: I work w/ guys from malwarebytes' hpHosts on a regular basis!

    I've professionally worked for decades as a combined domain-wide network admin & software engineer since 1994 (Even showing you HOW to migrate a hosts across an enterprise-> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )

    I've also been securing computers + WRITING GUIDES using CIS Tool (who took fixes from me http://slashdot.org/comments.p... - bonus) http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

    You told me you learn from guides?

    I write good ones that MILLIONS USE & was PAID FOR IT http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn...

    + WARES TO PROTECT USERS that are endorsed & hosted by security pros -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    You did all that? No!

    (& that's ONLY a SMALL part of what I could put out)

    APK

    P.S.=> You're all TALK -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & a "ne'er-do-well" in security... apk

  15. Coren22's desperation, lies, & libel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    False positive: I've wrote 'em long ago, no response vs. 60++ REPUTABLE sources (not nobodies) below that fries you Coren22!

    Is that your fake site for more lies Coren22?

    Lying about me LIKE YOU DID HERE punk -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ??

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    More "SALT IN YOUR WOUNDS" -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    APK

    P.S.=> /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

  16. Openning days by DrYak · · Score: 1

    How do they heat it in the copious winters when the hotels presumably don't generate waste heat?

    In the case of this project, it's mainly open from june until october
    (when there's guarantee that there will be enough waste heat to warm it good)
    outside this time frame, the cooling loop and the bassins are still around (apparently the hotel still needs some form of cooling) but the entrance door is locked.

    (But for the record there are other lake baths that are open all year long, because there are batshit crazy people who are ready to jump into (non-heated) lake water all year long, including in cold winter (I'm among them).)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]