Slashdot Mirror


How Outsourcing Companies Are Gaming the H-1B Visa System (nytimes.com)

New submitter shakah writes: The NY Times has a straightforward summary of how the H-1B Visa system is being gamed by companies inside and outside of the United States. Particularly interesting for me was their clarification on the argument that "VISA holders have to make prevailing wages, so they won't depress wages." Quoting: "Under federal rules, employers like TCS, Infosys and Wipro that have large numbers of H-1B workers in the United States are required to declare that they will not displace American workers. But the companies are exempt from that requirement if the H-1B workers are paid at least $60,000 a year. H-1B workers at outsourcing firms often receive wages at or slightly above $60,000, below what skilled American technology professionals tend to earn, so those firms can offer services to American companies at a lower cost, undercutting American workers."

284 comments

  1. A better idea by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about H1-B Visa holders get paid 110% of the prevailing wage so that only the companies who seriously need a specialist and legitimately can't find any local talent will hire them. Also, give H1-B holders a ten year window to work in the U.S. that isn't dependent on staying with a single employer. If someone else hires away your H1-B employee, that's your company's problem.

    1. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how it is done in some European countries.

    2. Re:A better idea by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I like that idea.

      The corporations would try to game it by using job titles that don't fit the job. Like "junior apprentice programmer" requiring 20 years of experience.

      So we need a way to correctly reflect either the job or the skills. We could base it upon the median salaries of the people with the same certifications living within 100 miles. But not everyone has certifications.

      Any better ideas?

    3. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This

    4. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the future of IT unfortunately...

    5. Re:A better idea by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pretty much plan isn't going to work if you allow for blatant rule-breaking. Make it so if you have a "junior apprentice programmer" that has 20 years of experience and is running the project, the company gets fined and the hiring manager risks jail time. Have random audits to confirm people are following the rules. Enforce those rules.

      Besides, if someone is applying for an H-1B visa for a "junior apprentice programmer" on the basis that they need a specialist that isn't available in the US population, that application should be rejected on it's face.

    6. Re:A better idea by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have random audits to confirm people are following the rules. Enforce those rules.

      Sure, but that requires *more* government -- to enforce those rules and punishments -- and, as we all know, that would be bad and a "job killer", unlike easy access to cheap, foreign H-1B workers ... oh, wait.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    7. Re:A better idea by taustin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pretty much plan isn't going to work if you allow for blatant rule-breaking. Make it so if you have a "junior apprentice programmer" that has 20 years of experience and is running the project, the company gets fined and the hiring manager risks jail time. Have random audits to confirm people are following the rules. Enforce those rules.

      And watch the auditors start buying expensive boats and cars, and taking long vacations in exotic resorts, because then the game is to get your competitor in trouble with accusations of wrongdoing, true or not.

      There is no rule that can't be gamed. The only benefit to changing the rules is that it forces the game players to learn the new rules. Sometimes, it might even change the winners. But it'll still be gamed, and still to the advantage of those at the top.

    8. Re:A better idea by tempmpi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The real prevailing wage is hard to check. Companies will just not mention some of the special skills of that person and then they can hire a very skilled person for more than 110% "prevailing wage", when they are really paying 80% prevailing wage. Or they are paying 110% prevailing wage but expecting 200% working hours.

      I think a much simpler solution would be to change the random lottery to a list that is ordered by wage and give the H1B only to people on the top of that list. That would make it hard to abuse H1Bs to drive down wages and give priority to the people that would likely really contribute the US economy. It could also potentially drive up wages for us workers: If companies are required to offer 200k per year to a foreigner with a certain skillset to guarantee him a H1B, then us workers with the same skillset will also notice what their skills are worth and will demand higher wages. And if the lowest wage that still qualified for a H1B is too low, then you just reduce the number of H1Bs.

      --
      Jan
    9. Re:A better idea by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The fix is to reverse auction all jobs open to H-1B visa holders. The pay for the job would be published and listed. The lowest bidding American (if any) would get the job, and no foreigners would get the job if there was an American willing to take it. The employers should like the system because it will depress wages, and the employees should enjoy the system because it will be open and fair.

      Or both would hate it. Unqualified people depressing wages for all. If nothing else, it would discourage the use of H-1B, which is the goal, right?

      My other suggestion is a "tax" on H-1B that's equal to the cost to train someone for the job. Then the government will take that tax and literally train someone for that job.

    10. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, well then. I guess we should just get rid of all rules and give up. You heard it here, folks! No point in rules since people will break them!

    11. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rich people want tech workers so they can get even richer. When they have to share too much of that profit with said workers, the effort is self-defeating.

      No set of laws will remove these incentives. There is no system that will "solve" this problem.

      All you can do is constantly push, and adapt.

    12. Re:A better idea by ranton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about H1-B Visa holders get paid 110% of the prevailing wage

      The corporations would try to game it by using job titles that don't fit the job. Like "junior apprentice programmer" requiring 20 years of experience.

      Just enforce the rules. The IRS can take the time to determine if a company is abusing tax law during an audit, so a government agency should be able to determine in a company is gaming the H1-B program. I think most people would be willing to accept some small abuses would happen, as long as blatant abuses are prosecuted.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    13. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How about H1-B Visa holders get paid 110% of the prevailing wage

      They will just come up with some way to game the definition of "prevailing wage." Set a hard dollar amount that is prohibitive like $150K and that automatically increases each year by 5% or rate of inflation, whichever is greater.

    14. Re:A better idea by Raseri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We all know that this won't change, and the only vote that matters is the one you cast with your wallet. The actual solution is to not do business with companies that use H1-B workers at all, whether those workers are employees of the company or "contractors" who are actually employed by InfoSys, Tata, and so on. For example, Harley-Davidson got rid of its IT department and contracted InfoSys to do the work. And, of course, InfoSys brought in nothing but Indians for the jobs. Not surprisingly, someone brought a discrimination suit against them, but I don't know how that turned out; more than likely InfoSys bought the judge. H-D can then claim that they just hired InfoSys, and InfoSys is the one hiring the workers. In this way, H-D's hands are clean, legally.

      What we actually need is a comprehensive list of companies that have done this (think Disney, etc), to facilitate boycotting those companies.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    15. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Have random audits to confirm people are following the rules. Enforce those rules.

      We already have that as part of H1B. But they worked the system such that enforcement has literally no budget and that's why there have been less than a handful of H1B violations over the last 2 decades - and those violations were just so egregious that they couldn't be ignored for fear of PR backlash against the department of labor, the kind of backlash that gets people fired.

    16. Re:A better idea by Copid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My proposal is simpler: Just auction off the visas and allow them to be traded on a secondary market. If it's typical to underpay an H1-B holder by $10K per year, that $10K gets built into the price of the visa automatically, removing the incentive. The market price would also be a useful indicator of actual labor shortages (i.e. if companies are paying the equivalent of a $50K per year premium, it's a sign that there really is a shortage of a particular skill set). Having visas with different expiration dates on the market would even provide a skills "yield curve" that you could plot to get in idea of future demand for different skills. It also guarantees that scarce visa slots go to the most valuable workers.

      It wouldn't exactly be a visa at that point so much as fungible work authorization token, but I don't think that would be the end of the world. Markets are very good at solving these sorts of problems.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    17. Re:A better idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The solution to that is to have the worker own the visa, not the employer.

      If they have 20 years' genuine experience and you try to pay them like a junior they'll soon sling their hook and fuck off somewhere else if the option's open. And all power to their elbow.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:A better idea by shakah · · Score: 1

      Maybe change it so the H-1B visas are awarded based on annual salary?

      In other words, issue the visas for the jobs that will pay the most. My guess is a transparent market like that would quickly get rid of wage disparities (though how to combat the lobbying effort+money that supports the status quo is the next obvious question).

    19. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but that requires *more* government --

      The auditing would probably get contracted out to some congresscritters cousin (at twice the price and a third the quality of government employees), who would then hire a bunch of H-1Bs to do the auditing.

      Audit results would be heavily influenced by A) is the company in said congresscritters (or an ally) district, and B) is the company using the same outsourcing company as the auditor.

    20. Re:A better idea by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that was Disney did? Hire Infosys, not H1-B directly?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    21. Re:A better idea by Raseri · · Score: 2

      Yes, in fact, this is what most of them do. It allows them to play innocent. It is also how many manufacturers in the United States employ illegal aliens.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    22. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about H1-B Visa holders get paid 110% of the prevailing wage.

      How about for every 1 H1-B Visa holder a company must have 3 American workers at an equivalent position/pay rate or higher?

    23. Re:A better idea by parkinglot777 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... to work in the U.S. that isn't dependent on staying with a single employer. If someone else hires away your H1-B employee, that's your company's problem.

      This part is a misinformation. Currently, this is already included in H1-B visa deal. A person who is holding H1-B visa CAN change employer; however, the new employer must file for another H1-B petition (or transfer) as if it is a new petition except the remaining visa time may stay the same or get extended -- http://www.immihelp.com/visas/...

    24. Re:A better idea by maligor · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that requires *more* government --

      The auditing would probably get contracted out to some congresscritters cousin (at twice the price and a third the quality of government employees), who would then hire a bunch of H-1Bs to do the auditing.

      Audit results would be heavily influenced by A) is the company in said congresscritters (or an ally) district, and B) is the company using the same outsourcing company as the auditor.

      I find that a very interesting in the sense that a more 'stable' (in the sense of ruling policitical parties) seems to promote corruption.

      The more I've contemplated the problem, the more I think proportional voting is better than the FPTP that the US uses. Too much stability seems to create the exact same problems that monarchies do.

    25. Re:A better idea by RelliK · · Score: 1

      I think just removing the requirement that a H1B visa is tied to a specific job would go a long way towards solving the issue and would, in effect, be self-regulating. If an employee is underpaid or mistreated he can vote with his feet -- unless of course the company can keep him on a leash via H1B visa. Remove the leash and situation self-corrects. Suddenly, it's no longer cheaper to hire H1B workers.

      I also like the idea of a H1B tariff, or making the cost of the visa substantial, say 10% of the prevailing salary. That would still allow companies to hire foreign workers if there is truly a shortage (you know, the problem that H1B program is supposed to address), but would make it unprofitable to abuse the system.

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    26. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rules exist to keep rich people rich. Rules that get in the way of that are rarely enforced. You can talk all day about how much better things would be if we would just enforce the rules...but....the people in a position to make that happen are also in a position to profit from it not happening.

    27. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, too hard to enforce. Here's an easy, easy approach. H1B visa has a $10K application cost and $100K/year tax in addition to employment taxes. Index those to inflation. If you really can't find the talent in the US, then an extra $100K (before taxes) isn't that bad to get the talent. It will also drive the creation of that talent in citizens and green card holders.

    28. Re:A better idea by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Make it this simple - any US citizen with the requirements can apply for the job at the stated 100% pay. All H1Bs must be posted. If that makes an H1B position unpleasant for the H1B folks, maybe they won't take those jobs either.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    29. Re:A better idea by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't solve the problem here.

      The problem is not that there isn't a law about prevailing wage - there is. The problem is that the prevailing wage of generic IT consultants is low, while the prevailing wage of highly skilled software engineering specialists is high. The outsourcing companies are hiring moderately skilled software engineering specialists, into generic IT consulting roles at generic IT consulting prevailing wages. They are then selling services to other companies and displacing the highly skilled software engineering specialists.

      The correct solution is to require that when an H1B's services are contracted out to another company, their wage must be at or above the prevailing wage for a generic IT consultant *and* at or above the wage of the job they are doing for the company they're being contracted to.

      Then it will cease to be profitable for these outsourcing companies to hire in the indians.

    30. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is "simpler"?!

    31. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that a very interesting in the sense that a more 'stable' (in the sense of ruling policitical parties) seems to promote corruption.

      What gives you that idea?

    32. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual solution is to not do business with companies that use H1-B workers at all

      So I should stop using electricity from Southern California Edison, then? Maybe I can build my own nuke plant and run 2,000 miles of wire and build my own little substation down the street.

    33. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have noticed that the number of IRS agents has been going down for years. Fewer bodies means fewer audits done, means easier to game the system.

    34. Re:A better idea by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      110%? No, still room to somehow game the "work study" that determines the salary. I say 150% or more, and the wage doesn't get paid from the employer to the H1-B, it goes through a government agency who collects that 150% and then passes the actual salary along, then takes the other chunk and puts it into a worker training program targeted at the shortage. We've seen in Canada ways that the Temporary Foreign Worker program can be abused in a similar fashion, and one of the better tricks was employers arranging housing for their workers and "helpfully" pre-deducting rent from their pay.

    35. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A much easier way and one that doesn't require trying to figure out prevailing wages, job misclassification, etc. (which would take a lot of manpower and still not yield good info).

      Just add a 12% federal tax to each H1B wage to be paid by the company directly to the IRS. Don't allow the amount to be decreased or credited by any method. Of course, politicians will grandstand and say that the money will be used to fund local high tech scholarships, but in reality will mostly be wasted by bureaucrats. But at least the sleazy companies will be demonstrating they really need these employees, and as a bonus we will know the exact amount of H1B's are being paid each year so we can base future decisions on hard facts and not guess work.

    36. Re: A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or tax the pay 50 to 100% and apply it towards scholarships for us citizens for that particular field. That way, you increase the worker pool, and people in that field aren't stuck with quite as high of student loans.

    37. Re:A better idea by nine-times · · Score: 2

      Yeah, rules don't work. That's why we should just make murder and theft legal.

    38. Re: A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about throwing the CEO in jail for ten years if the rules are violated?

    39. Re:A better idea by Copid · · Score: 1

      This is "simpler"?!

      Yes. Determining "market rate" for a worker a company desperately wants to underpay is always the tricky part. Just let companies buy and sell the visas and you'll get an actual market rate right there for you in black and white. No need to write a "market rate" regulation, and then a bunch of additional regulations for how to determine market rate, and then a bunch of additional regulations to put patches around the last set of regulations once companies figure out how to game your definition of "market rate." If you have an actual market, a "market rate" is a real thing that you can just look up.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    40. Re: A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about if the rules are violated the company is fined the total salaries of everyone who was laid off and replaced by the H1B workers. With a 10 year statue of limitations and fines are from layoff date to date they were caught. The fines to be paid to the workers.

      So lay off 20 IT workers to bring in H1B workers. Get caught 8 years after doing so means you pay those 20 workers 8 years of salary as the fine.

      I know I would wait 8 or 9 years before reporting them, to Maximize my ROI. lol

    41. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youll have issues ID'ing the companies that do it.

      Just off the top of my head I know of

      First Group (Who owns)
            Greyhound Lines
            First Capital Connect
            Greyhound Canada
            First Great Eastern
      Disney
      Chase Bank
      E-Trade

      There are lots of others, I bet by the time we ID all of them there would be nothing left to buy accept from small local companies.

    42. Re:A better idea by tchuladdiass · · Score: 2

      The simple answer -- have a specific list of job titles and matching skills requirements that are determined to be in short supply. This list gets reviewed annually. Any unemployed IT worker could register their skills, and would get first crack at new positions when an H1B worker is requested.

    43. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could appoint an independent body to watch over the auditors and enforce a 10 year minimum prison sentence in no less than a medium security prison for taking a bribe at which point you can watch them collectively shit their pants at the thought of looking soft.

      This is one of those areas where I would rather see the auditors harder and stricter than they have to be out of fear of looking like they are in their pocket than one who is going too soft on them because they are in their pocket.

    44. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think it would be simpler to let the companies buy and sell employees directly. Goodness knows we're moving in that direction.

    45. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait.. Wha? You mean they're NOT legal? Does George know?

    46. Re:A better idea by wildfish · · Score: 1

      this is a great idea. Perhaps modified slightly by job category so programmers don't push up some really special talent in another field that doesn't pay on the same scale.

    47. Re:A better idea by Copid · · Score: 1

      Along those lines: Something I didn't mention in my original post is that private employees should be allowed to buy the visas themselves as well. If you have your own visa, you can take it with you and never have to worry about whether the company has the extra cash to sponsor you, and you're protected from fluctuations in the market rate for the visa. If not, the company will have to acquire and hold one for you while you work there. That would do at least something to mitigate the "slave labor" situation that currently exists with the H1-B program.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    48. Re:A better idea by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Immigration grants work visas based on projected requirements. People with those skills apply for a visa and get pre approval which allows them to apply for jobs and enter for interviews. Once an offer is made then if conditions are met (market wage, not a fly-by-night company, guarantee of minimum term, more intensive background checks, etc) then the work visa is granted. Allow the person a certain amount of time to find another job if they lose theirs or to transfer easily as long as it's in the same field. They just become another person competing for jobs.

    49. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It'll be gamed to the advantage of those at the top"

      Or to look at it another way: "Those at the top will be those who learn to game the system most successfully."

      It's a true meritocracy.

    50. Re: A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. The fact that everything is mired and muddled was on purpose. The fact that evryone has a damn smartphone should imply restructuring to a t in this regard should be a snap. The very people who buy the laws, also get to make it as difficult as they can, at your expense, for you to get ahead. Hence the absurd bs confusion happening now. In America there really isn't anything NOT for sale. 3 letter acronyms don't protect anything other than the obfuscation of truth. Part of which includes theft and therefore honesty as well.

    51. Re: A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or go solar. Or you could just go live in a cave.

    52. Re:A better idea by The_Rook · · Score: 1

      how about auctioning the visas instead of giving them out in a lottery. those companies that really need the visas can bid the price up and those companies that are simply looking for cheap, imported labor will find that they are ending up paying the prevailing wage anyway.

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
    53. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The traditional way is to get to know your politicians, talk with them, and get the community to work together to get things done. But that's too broad so it ends up being a different topic and so we're left with a balancing act on regulations which, unless it is against the people, ends up outdated, gamed, and doing more harm than good.

    54. Re:A better idea by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      H1B corporate code for training is expensive and they don't want to pay for it. So the US government screws students with massive rip off loans for higher education training, then screw them over by stealing the training paid for by other countries who do not rip off the higher education students with loans and thus be a lot cheaper. Basically US corporations having their caking and eating but simply keeping their cake and stealing everyone else's to eat.

      Can not find trained citizens - THEN FUCKING TRAIN THEM.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    55. Re:A better idea by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I'm okay with this, but I would also say get rid of H1B altogether and give them green cards. College Educated technically inclined immigrants are EXACTLY the sort we should be encouraging to come, live, and stay in the US.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    56. Re:A better idea by nbritton · · Score: 1

      We all know that this won't change

      That's what happens when you don't have a union or professional association who can lobby on your behalf. Sometimes the smartest people are the biggest idiots.

    57. Re:A better idea by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Isn't that really the point? Add in so many rules and regulations so that eventually the government can change the management (and ownership) of a company at any time for any number of reasons. Communism, fascism, medieval feudal system, they are basically all the same under different names and the basically all mean that everybody works for the government and buys everything from the government.

    58. Re:A better idea by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Like anyone cares about breaking labor rules. The watchdogs (as many on here fondly point out) are an aging dinosaur.

      There are plenty of cases of industrial accidents with thousands of labor board complaints that no-one did anything about, and during a conservative regime its even worse.

    59. Re:A better idea by bsharma · · Score: 1

      An extremely simple "better idea" - just set the minimum offered salary to $100K; That should filter off a lot of unnecessary applications. And, nobody can argue that employers are importing low cost workers.

    60. Re:A better idea by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Or go with supply and demand: Worker must be paid at least as much as the highest paid employee of the whole company (if there is such a shortage, then the worker's skills are obviously more valuable than the CEO's).

    61. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, kill the h1B program all together. Far better to increase the green cards but with all of these having a focus on business need. OR simply to cut the number of green cards on family basis, and then create a class of green cards that are based on high tech needs.

    62. Re:A better idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think proportional voting is better

      You want to make the USA like Belgium and Italy?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    63. Re: A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is simple. All displaced workers must have law suits against employer that fired them for cheaper labor. There must be some publicity shame as well as monetary damages that takes away cost savings from behaving this way.
      At the same time the displaced worker must sue H1B company and H1B employee for visa fraud and ask for damages.
      I know its too easy to walk away and find another job but we must fight against the corruption.

    64. Re:A better idea by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      How about H1-B Visa holders get paid 110% of the prevailing wage so that only the companies who seriously need a specialist and legitimately can't find any local talent will hire them. Also, give H1-B holders a ten year window to work in the U.S. that isn't dependent on staying with a single employer. If someone else hires away your H1-B employee, that's your company's problem.

      Just kill the H1-B program. Companies will either pay market rate or if there's truly a shortage, which in most cases there isn't or train up their existing employees (which they don't like to do now) or even support training programs in schools to provide a future educated resource pool.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    65. Re:A better idea by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      I already answered to someone's post already. What you said is actually a misconception of H1-B visa that is very common for those who do not really know much about the visa. A H1-B holder CAN change his/her employer at any time while holding a visa without the need to let the current employer know. The only requirement is the new employer must file for a petition as if it is a new application but with certain exceptions -- http://www.immihelp.com/visas/...

      Also, auctioning the visa will create another issue later on. If you think that big companies/corporations will not find a way to work around the system, you have too much trust on them. Besides, how would small companies (which is the main idea in TFA) compete with bigger companies/corporations for the visa price anyway?

      Another issue with your idea is that it would result in most if not all of the H1-B holders would be in technology. Currently, the visa is for many different fields (if you want to check all of these fields, go to http://www.flcdatacenter.com/ ); however, the prevailing wages for technology field are at the top. In other words, there is no point having other job fields for other smaller companies to get a visa for their employees then.

      TFA is actually talking about how big companies/corporations abuse the visa, NOT about what's wrong with the visa. Your trend of solution is trying to change the current visa method, but it is just a matter of time for big companies/corporations to find another way to abuse it again.

      I am not suggesting any solution because I don't have time to think about it. The issue is not as simple as it seems to be, and any change will have more impact to smaller companies whose the visa is supposed to be for rather than for big companies/corporations.

    66. Re: A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realize that tech professionals are highly adaptuve. Thus it is very rare for one if us to not be able to easily and quickly pick up a skill. The requirement for h1b needs to be that they are unable to train someone for the position.

    67. Re:A better idea by Copid · · Score: 1

      What you said is actually a misconception of H1-B visa that is very common for those who do not really know much about the visa. A H1-B holder CAN change his/her employer at any time while holding a visa without the need to let the current employer know.

      I'm aware of this, but they still do need to find a new employer who is willing to sponsor an H1-B, which is a hurdle that a US worker doesn't have. It still puts H1-B employees at a competitive disadvantage, and in a tight job market, that advantage can be huge.

      Also, auctioning the visa will create another issue later on. If you think that big companies/corporations will not find a way to work around the system, you have too much trust on them.

      How would they abuse it, specifically? This is a really straightforward economic question: What would a giant company do to mess up this particular market for everybody else that they don't do with every other market?

      Besides, how would small companies (which is the main idea in TFA) compete with bigger companies/corporations for the visa price anyway?

      The same way they compete with bigger companies for everything else you buy. With money. Microsoft and Google are huge, but they don't hire all of the employees or buy up all of the computers. They acquire what makes economic sense for them to acquire. Smaller companies do the same.

      Another issue with your idea is that it would result in most if not all of the H1-B holders would be in technology.

      A couple of things: First, that's not necessarily the case. It's very easy to create "classes" of visas for different industries if that's an important problem to solve. That would provide even clearer information on where the shortages are. Second, if the purpose of the H1-B program is to bring in valuable employees in industries where there is a real shortage, there's not a very good economic argument for bringing them in for low-wage jobs.

      TFA is actually talking about how big companies/corporations abuse the visa, NOT about what's wrong with the visa.

      There are a bunch of problems with the visa, and they're largely tied to how easy it is to abuse. The key ones are:

      1) A lottery system assigns a valuable resource randomly instead of buy actual value. A lucky bonehead can get a visa when an incredibly valuable genius doesn't, which defeats the whole point.
      2) The whole job description / prevailing wage system is total nonsense and easily gamed.
      3) Whether there's a "shortage" of workers or not is entirely up to debate instead of actual pricing data.
      4) Employees on a visa are at a competitive disadvantage because it's harder for them to change jobs, depressing wages.

      All of those problems go away automatically (or are at least mitigated, as in [4]) without any additional regulation (and with the removal of a ton of existing red tape) if you just let companies and people buy and sell visa slots. We don't set a up lottery and bureaucracy up to allocate corn or rice. There's really no need to do it with work visas.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    68. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you from the NRA? ;)

    69. Re: A better idea by phocion · · Score: 1

      So they can switch jobs IF the new employer is willing to go through the hassle of getting them what is effectively a brand new H-1B, which could be denied and result in them losing the new job and getting deported. So, you're correct that technically they can switch, but the reality of the situation is that they won't.

      --
      Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to.
    70. Re: A better idea by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      No, you are getting it backward. Actually, it is easier and new employers would prefer it that way because they will go through with much LESS hassle compared to the original employer. Why? It has been approved once already, and that is an easier process.

    71. Re:A better idea by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Rules that run counter to the prevailing culture need more enforcement. The degree to which they oppose the culture dictates how much force is required to enforce them.

      Given this, some rules become counter productive due to this enforcement cost, e.g. this case. In extreme cases, it is simply not possible to apply the necessary amount of force constitutionally.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    72. Re:A better idea by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Have random audits to confirm people are following the rules. Enforce those rules.

      Sure, but that requires *more* government -- to enforce those rules and punishments -- and, as we all know, that would be bad and a "job killer", unlike easy access to cheap, foreign H-1B workers ... oh, wait.

      Continue to vote Republican and you got what you asked for.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    73. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You _ARE_ bringing in here yet another substandard hominid from some primitive backwards land who will want to interbreed if not come in with even more more substandard hominids with him, after proving for millennia they fell behind? Truly, raise wages for janitors, modernize and get this place clean, or pay me the medical treatments for the multiple diseases I ve suffered from eating from primitives, when I still dared to...

    74. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU KEEP EATING MY COMMENTS. MORE TO THE POINT THE MORE THEY MISS. WHAT HAPPENED TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION? You get the smell of VOMIT in your pizza? It is a FUGAL DISEASE in INDIANS that reaches tomato through the HUMOR atmosphere of Non-Humans who do not care washing or sterilizing. DID YOU KNOW THAT? GO EAT FROM INDIANS IN DUN KIN DO NUTS. I am one of the NUTS DONE by the NOT DUN Kin.

    75. Re:A better idea by maligor · · Score: 1

      I think proportional voting is better

      You want to make the USA like Belgium and Italy?

      No, the US wouldn't become more like Italy or Belgium it'd become more like the US.

      While Italy certainly does have issues and has had for a very long time, why Belgium? Do you actually mean the EU Council or Parliament?

      Realistically if the US become more like Belgium, I'd be all for it. Belgium makes good beer and haven't invaded anyone for a while.

    76. Re:A better idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      While Italy certainly does have issues and has had for a very long time, why Belgium? Do you actually mean the EU Council or Parliament?

      What a stupid question. Do I look like an American?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    77. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that's how it is now, kind of.

      There is a H1-B portability act that allows employees to do exactly that, sling their hook and fuck off somewhere else that pays true market rates or better. They just have to wait until the government *receives* the employer portability application (filed by the new employer without needing any assistance or knowledge from the old employer), which with FedEx\UPS can be the next day. Exactly what you are suggesting. Good.

      How the companies screw up the intent of that law is they say "sure you can take your visa to an employee that pays your properly, but if you leave before 2 years you have to pay us all your relocation and immigration costs", and you can be sure those are set at a punitive level to make leaving near impossible. Then they ship them back to India before that 2 years expires so they can pass their knowledge to local Indian workers who continue to work for the client remotely.

    78. Re:A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what stops them from being deported if the hosting company finds out they're looking around and revokes their H1-B status?

  2. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know nobody cares except Donald Trump.

    Bring those jobs back.

    Start by going after Disney, they're replacing all their tech workers with H1B visa workers and making the fired workers train their replacements.

    WTF.

    1. Re:First Post by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Start by going after Disney, they're replacing all their tech workers with H1B visa workers.

      Start by never going to Disney.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  3. Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, that's the ticket...

    1. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Yep, in reality with this and even the farming jobs. The truth is "wages that Americans won't accept".

      At competitive wages, you can always find people willing to do the job.

    2. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Coren22 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the farming, I have heard from people who live in those areas, the farm owners won't even hire an American, as they can demand minimum wage, but an illegal will work for dollars a day and can't complain.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you "heard" did you?

    4. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I don't live in a farmland area. I don't have personal experience to bring to the table. Do you have personal experience that contradicts what my friends have told me? Do you have personal experience that agrees with it? If you don't have any personal experience to draw from, why would you expect more from me?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, OP is on the whole correct in what he has "heard" but is a bit unclear on the specifics. Migrant farm workers typically work on a "piece rate" where they get paid a fee per unit of production (bushel, or what have you) rather than a fixed hourly amount. They end up doing fairly well for themselves (often significantly more than minimum wage) but work their asses off to achieve it. Most people raised with a modern urban lifestyle who are hunting for a minimum wage job aren't looking to work that hard, which is why farmers don't want to hire them.

      This work is also seasonal in nature--they can work for most of the year, but they're also travelling from region to region to stay employed (i.e. first they're picking cherries in michigan, then apples in pennsylvania, then oranges in florida, or whatever). This is NOT a stable life, and most people have no desire to live this way regardless of what the pay is.

      A few weeks ago, NPR's Morning Edition did a pretty good story on some of the challenges farm workers (and their kids) face. It's pretty good reading/listening for the "they took our jobs" crowd (to be honest, I'm normally on their side of the debate, but on farm work in particular, they have it wrong).

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    6. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That\s not the way it works. You made the claim, you back it up.

    7. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      I've heard it too, from the farmers.

    8. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 says he and his trolls and sockpuppets don't need proof http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and lo and behold against apk again too. Good luck getting that known troll Coren22 to provide proof of anything. He's a brain damaged by aspergers autistic freak.

    9. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 says "hosts=bad" (they add security, speed, & reliability) & bitches on admin priv to UPDATE vs. threats

      "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

      & admits using admin priv himself

      +

        How else can I programmatically update hosts minus it in Windows?

      ---

      "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

      You FINALLY later admit there's no other way!

      FACT:

      Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware (best one) DEMANDS you use admin privelege (you saying it's "bad" too?) it can't do its job fully otherwise, like many security tools do!

      APK

      P.S.=> Lastly - Coren22, there is a CURE for your "outism" due to your retarded by assburgers clearly defective brain (lol) - quit making childish sigs about me & sockpuppet accounts as well as telling lies about me - I'll stop OUTING you, immature retarded genetic mistake assburgers outism "signature boy" troll... apk

    10. Re:Must be more jobs 'murcans wont do I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical autistic retard talking out of his ass again. Why the hell are taxes wasted on you wastes? You claim to be mcse as I read and now I know why computer security is so bad. We have dolts at the console like Coren22 the genetic error cretin!

  4. 'gaming'? by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Troll

    The entire idea is ludicrous, government shouldn't be involved in any business, labour, wage, money, price regulations at all. There shouldn't be any government involvement in business and money is my position. As to 'gaming' the system, it is clear that the system is unsustainable and it will be routed around. It's like the Internet, business treats these laws as damage and routes around them.

    By the way, it is trivial to get around idiotic price controls, it just it costs some set up money. Example: pay the wage whatever the government requires, then return the money in some form of a service or product or fund purchase, whatever it takes.

    1. Re:'gaming'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      government shouldn't be involved in any business, labour, wage, money, price regulations at all. There shouldn't be any government involvement in business and money is my position.

      Government is involved in who can come in/out of the country, that's kind of one of the most fundamental, basic functions they fulfill. So yes, they should be involved when you're talking about people from other places coming into a country to work.

    2. Re:'gaming'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the H-1B program isn't really an immigration program, which is the power you're kind of referring to. It is some kind of private employee contract enforced by the government. The H-1B employee is tied to their host employer, if they quit for another job or are fired their visa is instantly void and they either have to return to their country or apply for another (which is highly unlikely to succeed due to limits).

    3. Re:'gaming'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not true H-1 visas are transferable from company to company. You are mixing up L-1 with H-1.

  5. Suck it NERDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cost too much and you have no social connections!! That means you can kiss my ass while I bring in some real help to get this computer wiring done. Got too full of yourselves with with that Y2K thing and it's taking years for this shit to sink in.

    Honestly I don't even want to talk to you people, but if we start calling you blue collar and throw you out of the main office then you'll probably try to unionize and we'll have to fire you. Actually, that might not be a bad idea. You can train your replacement online at home after you come off the picket line.

    1. Re:Suck it NERDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suck me!

    2. Re:Suck it NERDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Got too full of yourselves with with that Y2K thing"

      Most computer nerds knew Y2K was massively over-hyped. The press, people who were looking for 15 minutes of fame & politicians looking for pork were the ones screaming the loudest about it. Nerds were just saying make sure you have backups (always a good suggestion) and have your tech supports number handy.

    3. Re:Suck it NERDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolling trolls will troll.

    4. Re:Suck it NERDS! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. The massive amount of extra work for countless developers the world over says otherwise. The lack of apparent effects of Y2K were because there was a tonne of work done to make it that way. I guess if you weren't in the industry when this was happening you might not realise.

    5. Re:Suck it NERDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *** SMACK*** is the sound of dave420 going down eating his words getting bitchslapped by apk http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    6. Re:Suck it NERDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove to us you are in the industry as a developer. Go on Dave. Let's see some proof. What am I saying? Never will happen. Everyone knows you're a fucking lying loser.

    7. Re:Suck it NERDS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. Look at how stupid this guy showed us that cretin Dave420 is http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  6. the French Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the French dream... what's wrong with pursuing your dreams in France or any other country for that matter?

    1. Re:the French Dream by thedonger · · Score: 1

      What about the French dream... what's wrong with pursuing your dreams in France or any other country for that matter?

      We changed that to the "Freedom dream." Along with freedom fries, freedom kissing, the freedom braid, freedom toast, renamed the Gene Hackman movie "The Freedom Connection," and freedom onion soup.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:the French Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you survived Rumsfeld's amok run rofl...

    3. Re:the French Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't really complained because the foreigners coming to the US via the H1B program want to work in the first place, and the Government will still be able to collect taxes from that (at least there's some benefit).
      In France, they're just coming to get the RSAs and CMU without having to do anything at all.

    4. Re:the French Dream by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Should 20 companies be able to get 32,000 visas? Shouldn't there be a max of how many visas a single company can apply, like say, 500 max? That's the loophole that allows large outsourcing companies to DOS other H-1B applications.

      There's a quota of 85,000 visas/year while there are 233,000 visa applications filed in just 7 days at the start of the process. Even if the rules were made fair, there's only a slim chance the french guy could've gotten an H-1B visa.

    5. Re:the French Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your dream to make bitter comments on Slashdot?

  7. Ummmm ... DUH? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, show of hands ... who the hell is surprised to find out that this whole thing is being misused? Anyone?

    The whole bloody point is to drive down wages and replace American workers.

    Anybody who tells you otherwise is lying to you.

    How anybody could possibly be shocked at this 'revelation' is mind boggling.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole bloody point is to drive down wages and replace American workers.

      The sad thing is that there are plenty of unemployed American programmers and IT workers willing to work for less than the prevailing wage, many of them as equally incompetent as the immigrants.

      In the old days they would hire some kid out of high school and TRAIN HIM. What the hell happened to that?

    2. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      We have to feign ignorance, so we don't feel stupid for reelecting our crooked politicians that bring home the bacon for their cronies.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by siphonophore · · Score: 1

      Agreed that H1-B is a gift to employers, but I'd take it a step further:

      Even if the Zuckerberg/Obama H1-B rhetoric were true, you have a politicized fed program attempting to address a market need. Markets react nearly instantly, feds react (depending on who controls House/Sen/Prez) in 2-6 years. So you have things like the antiquated $60K exemption (probably made more sense way back when rule was enacted). A "good" H1-B policy may be impossible given the way it is currently managed.

      --
      Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
      -Scott Adams
    4. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      In the old days they would hire some kid out of high school and TRAIN HIM. What the hell happened to that?

      What are you, some kind of communist?

      Workers are to be cast aside as soon as they become inconvenient or expensive. If you're not evicting little old ladies and shooting puppies, you're not trying hard enough.

      How do you expect to maximize shareholder value (and therefore executive bonuses) if you have to act like humans?

      America has reached the point where "asshole capitalism" is the expected norm, and is almost a religion unto itself. Everything else is irrelevant.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the old days they would hire some kid out of high school and TRAIN HIM. What the hell happened to that?

      Are you under the impression that IT is like operating a drill press on an assembly line or something? If so, no wonder you're scared of being outsourced.

    6. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That whole system is a joke. It enables US companies to fuck over US tech workers and fuck over the US government by providing massive tax loopholes.

    7. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole bloody point is to drive down wages and replace American workers.

      That's not quite accurate. I doubt that the point is to replace American workers.
      The point is to drive down labor costs.

      If there are Americans who are willing to settle for 1 or 2 cars, no boats, 200m^2 house/apartment, $20K/year of insurance, 1 month vacation/holiday/sick pay, 5 figure salaries, etc. then there are jobs for those Americans.

      Americans who want $100K+/year plus $25K+ of insurance plus $10K payroll taxes/FICA/WC/etc. plus 130/365 days off per year... hmmm... Do you really expect businesses to pony up $200-300K per employee per year for employees who are only around 2/3 of the time? How can a company keep its doors open like that?

      If you post an accurate job description for a legal amount of compensation and no American applies for the job, then why not hire a non-American? For example, "Junior Analyst. Must have 15 years of experience managing multi-million dollar projects. Salary: $45000." If every qualified American snubs that job posting, so be it. If you can find somebody out of Australia or Hungary who is qualified and willing, hire them. As long as they are not forced into unsafe working conditions or kept in bondage. If they enjoy working conditions that meet or exceed requirements of U.S. law, let it be. Then allow them to job hop.

      Oh, and open this up beyond tech. Let's see the same thing in landscaping, hospitality, construction, accounting, medicine, manufacturing, etc.

      Americans live in mind-boggling luxury. Even poor Americans have it good. People in Venezuela are starving. If you think that Venezuela is a horrible socialist backwater that brings on its own misery, fine. Show us what real capitalism looks like and allow immigrants to compete in your market.

    8. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The whole bloody point is to drive down wages and replace American workers.

      The sad thing is that there are plenty of unemployed American programmers and IT workers willing to work for less than the prevailing wage, many of them as equally incompetent as the immigrants.

      In the old days they would hire some kid out of high school and TRAIN HIM. What the hell happened to that?

      THe Job creators are starving the monster, as they put it.

      And the reason they don't hire people to train is that accountants have sucked up 100 percent of the overhead. Company has to have someone keeping track of the 500 dollars worth of pencils a year, so they hire a 100K accountant to perform that vital task.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Ummmm ... DUH? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In the old days they would hire some kid out of high school and TRAIN HIM. What the hell happened to that?

      Are you under the impression that IT is like operating a drill press on an assembly line or something? If so, no wonder you're scared of being outsourced.

      Are you under the impression that IT springs out of the ocean fully formed like Venus, and is ready to tackle all problems with no experience whatsoever?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  8. Didn't know that prevailing wage loophole existed by shadesofgreen · · Score: 1

    IMO, solution is to create a separate class of visas for outsourcing companies. H1B visas serves different purpose.

  9. Outsourcing companies need to get out! by linebackn · · Score: 2

    If U.S. companies don't want to hire U.S. workers, then these companies need to stop pretending, and just get the fuck out of the U.S altogether.

    1. Re:Outsourcing companies need to get out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do not like being ruled by Harvard-issue MBAs who recognize no accountability to anyone or anything but stockholders (Also known as "Foreign Companies"):

      Own property. Have trustworthy friends. Know how to work that property.

    2. Re:Outsourcing companies need to get out! by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      If U.S. companies don't want to hire U.S. workers, then these companies need to stop pretending, and just get the fuck out of the U.S altogether.

      They are, but only to avoid paying taxes in the US. Of course they're happy to keep a subsidiary or two in the US that does the selling while the profits are shoveled out of the country.
      Tax Inversion:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  10. Re:Didn't know that prevailing wage loophole exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    IMO, they should stop all H1B's and fast track tech workers for full green cards.

    That way they can demand what they are worth and if the company abuses them, they can do what most IT people do. Go find another job and give the company the finger.

  11. Dey terk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dey terk er jerbs!

  12. market forces trump nation-specific laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK, go pass a law that says companies have to higher higher priced Americans instead of lower priced foreign programmers.

    Now your company is competing for that huge $1 billion contract in Dubai. I'm the guy in Dubai awarding the contract. Why the hell do I pick your overpriced American company instead of the cheaper alternatives? Is it because you'll do a better job? Don't make me laugh.

    Sorry, but in the end you WILL lose to lower priced labor. The funny thing is, Slashdot groupthink sees this clearly when it isn't your job on the line. When it's someone else's job? Well, if their business model isn't working out, they should just get a new one.

    The world owes you nothing. You either compete, or lose out to those who do. You can't stop those market forces with national laws, any more than the Soviet Union is now competitive in the world automobile market due to THEIR protectionism. Protectionism doesn't work, and never has.

    1. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      It's very hard to compete with a much lower standard of living. I know economists like yourself don't need food, clothing or shelter but the rest of us do.

    2. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the TFA outlined the reason why government-specific laws were trumping market forces in this case, right?

      Bottom line is that the law sets a low-floor threshold salary of $60,000/year for H1-B's. If the law stated that ALL H1-B applicants had to undergo evaluation/recommendation instead of those paid less than $60,000/year, there would be far more market forces at work and far less abuse of the H1-B system.

    3. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't. Careful though, we might feel the need to import some freedom.

    4. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by Major+Blud · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Why the hell do I pick your overpriced American company instead of the cheaper alternatives? Is it because you'll do a better job [slashdot.org]? Don't make me laugh."

      So instead of choosing overpriced Americans (or possibly Europeans) you would choose somebody from India? Because they never have failed IT projects:

      http://www.computerworlduk.com...
      http://www.computerworld.com/a...
      http://www.businessinsider.com...

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    5. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's very hard to compete with a much lower standard of living.

      Perhaps, but the key thing you have to understand is that they are going to compete with YOU, whether you like it or not.

      The simple fact is that it's a world of 7.3 billions, and there's nothing "special" about Americans that justifies a large multiple over what other people are willing to do the same job for. I will agree that there are unqualified and incompetent programmers in Eastern Europe and India and China just like anywhere, but there are also really good programmers there, as good as any you'll find in the USA. You don't have to like that you are competing with them, but you are.

    6. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Somebody doesn't understand fee markets....take a class on economics. Now fuck off.

    7. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. They should free to compete. Let them do it...from there. As for the standard of living multiple, like in the NFL, you are what you are.

    8. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody doesn't understand fee markets....

      Best. Freudian slip. Ever.

    9. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very hard to compete with a much lower standard of living.

      Perhaps, but the key thing you have to understand is that they are going to compete with YOU, whether you like it or not.

      The simple fact is that it's a world of 7.3 billions, and there's nothing "special" about Americans that justifies a large multiple over what other people are willing to do the same job for. I will agree that there are unqualified and incompetent programmers in Eastern Europe and India and China just like anywhere, but there are also really good programmers there, as good as any you'll find in the USA. You don't have to like that you are competing with them, but you are.

      There is something special about Americans and that's America. Whether you like it or not, Americans have set up an economic system that not only allows businesses to thrive, but also the American worker live a comfortable life (until recently). So-called American companies refuse to admit that we pass laws that enable small companies to become big companies, we invest infrastructure that allows companies to move good cheaply and efficiently, our savings allow companies to borrow money - safely - and expand. There are all kinds of things Americans have done to make America great no thanks to big business.

      In many cases, the very countries who want to access the American market but refuse to invest in their own countries. Take any Indian outsourcing firm and deny them access to the USA's market and they will probably dry up. They certainly won't make money providing those same services to Indian companies.

      Same with the Chinese. Their economy was running gangbusters as long as Americans were buying their crap. Now, that wages are stagnant in the USA, China's not doing so well.

      This is a classic case of of killing the goose that laid the golden egg. American workers, despite any counter claim, are the engine that makes many of these third-world (I don't know that the appropriate name is) approach decent standards of living. Why do think the Europe has the EU? They're trying to emulate the success of the USA - in some cases they're better at it and others, no so much.

      Unfortunately, it seems that American business has see what can be done to workers in India and wants that for themselves. So now there is little investment by these companies in the country that allowed them to grow so much, e.g., Microsoft will fight tooth and nail to not pay corporate taxes then benevolently donate that amount to educating programmers.

      I would be really interesting if these same companies had to compete the way we Americans are being asked to compete. I don't think there's product out there that can't be bought cheaper offshore than here in the USA (Ali Baba?).

      What it comes down to is killing the American worker like this only ensures the eventual collapse of these companies. See how it's happening to IBM, Levi Strauss, etc.

    10. Re:market forces trump nation-specific laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the late 1990's to early 2000's when it was passed, $60k was a standard wage for IT employees.

      Maybe it was not a good idea to put a wage number in the law.

  13. From an ex H1-B perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real way to prevent this is to make sure that only a certain percentage of a companies workers can be H1-B if the company is above 100 employees. Say around 25%, I've worked in the software industry for over 15 years in and out of the US and was a H1-B from 2003-2009. If a company can't find at least 75% of it's staff from citizens / green card holders something scammy is definitely happening. I did a stint with a shady contracting company into a fortune 100 company and if anyone should have been shut down it was those guys. I quit after 6 months...
     

    1. Re:From an ex H1-B perspective by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      This. The problem isn't so much with a big company (like Google or Apple) hiring specific talent using an H-1B visa. It's with body-shop type contracting firms that employ almost 100% H-1B holders (except for maybe certain management roles), and then contract out to cover jobs/duties/tasks that otherwise would be done by U.S. workers. Get rid of those (Infosys, etc) and you'll go a long way to fixing the worst of the abuses.

  14. Re:Didn't know that prevailing wage loophole exist by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go find another job and give the company the finger.

    Companies don't want that, which is why the H1Bs work the way they do ... because that's what industry wanted.

    If they're using an H1B to fill jobs they can't find people for, wages should be going up. Instead they're bringing in cheaper labor to drive down American salaries and displace Americans.

    If those people had any ability to fight back or demand more, they just might. This way they're exactly what they're supposed to be .. cheap labor with fewer rights.

    Seriously, this didn't happen by accident. It was bought and paid for by industry.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  15. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by mileshigh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about a flat $50K/year tax payable straight to the gov't? Think of that as a tariff or duty. This would have several advantages:
      - Simple & stupid, can't game a flat fee
      - That kind of revenue wold keep the gov't interested in enforcing the program
      - Makes the process of hiring offshore much more expensive. Remember, the idea is that hiring offshore is supposed to be a *last* resort, so $50K wouldn't deter someone who truly needed a particular skill.
      - Makes it impractical to hire offshore lower-level employees, the kind that we already have plenty of and who are blatantly being replaced with foreigners just to save money.

  16. They make how much!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That feeling when you're a born & raised a white American in IT and make the 60,000 the article claims the outsourced workers are getting paid...

    1. Re:They make how much!? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      It depends where you live. 60k is great money if you're in someplace where the cost of living is low, but if you're in someplace like Silicon Valley? Yeah, good luck with that.

    2. Re:They make how much!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would accept a tech job at $60k. Last year I was in a job where I made a messily $10k. It was so physically demanding that the day or two I got off each week I didn't feel up to doing much of anything. Too spent to really work on my programming projects either.

      At $60k I could buy a nice house in a nice area nearby within a year and a half. I could buy a car that isn't a complete PoS. I could afford to buy materials for all the little projects I want to do some day. $60k would be incredibly comfortable around here.

      I would start working a job that pays $60k right now given the chance.

  17. H1-B and outsourcing where I work. by tekrat · · Score: 1

    I work for a large bank that rhymes with face. I have watched the area I work in go from 90% american workers to 90% H1-B workers. And that wouldn't be so bad, except on top of that, they are offshoring like crazy as well, and those guys on the other side of the planet do not do anything.

    Tickets come in during the night, and they sit on them. Then, when (we) the day shift comes in, they forward us all the tickets, meaning we start every day with a flood of work. What is the point of paying the offshore dweebs if they aren't doing squat?

    Sooner or later this policy will bite my company in the ass, and there will be no one left who knows these systems to fix it, because all the people who could have done the work were laid off to save a few bucks.

    And while I'm no fan of Trump, he's right -- all the H1-B women are preggers. They are having anchor babies like it's going out of style.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:H1-B and outsourcing where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while I'm no fan of Trump, he's right -- all the H1-B women are preggers. They are having anchor babies like it's going out of style.

      Didn't you get the PC memo? You should NOT be calling them "anchor babies".

      We should be using a much more accurate term to address them.

      You know, something like anchor babies...

    2. Re:H1-B and outsourcing where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never understood why high profile companies are so eager to hire H1-B or offshore folks to run their company. Its like having a dog be your personal Uber driver. Most of these folks are beginners getting paid 100K+ in the valley and not amounting to squat. They fly just under the radar so they only get a paycheck. Most don't learn any new skills and only maintain status quo. Ever wonder why your software sucks? When will the COO's of these companies realize that when you hire 50 H1-B to do the job of what a few experts could do, that the amount of operational costs sky rockets (new buildings, laptops, IT support, training, recruiter costs, ...) which outweigh the savings of hiring cheap labor in the first place. If you think experts cost a lot, wait until you have 50 amateurs running your company into the ground, wait never mind that is the CEO's job.

      Ever notice while Apple software has become less reliable over the years.
      Replace Apple with (HP, IBM, BMC, CA, Cisco, ...)

      I am not saying all H1-B folks are bad, as I have met many that are really good, its just the most are unskilled and worthless.

    3. Re:H1-B and outsourcing where I work. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Or "citizen of the USA"

    4. Re:H1-B and outsourcing where I work. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Chase feed work is out sourced as well to per job field people and when I used to call in at times the overseas phone people sucked and the tickets got mixed up quite a bit with alot of WTF going on as well.

    5. Re:H1-B and outsourcing where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are citizens, which is why they're anchor babies.

      They can be both at the same time.

    6. Re:H1-B and outsourcing where I work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the Chinese are honest about it though. They go the route of "birth_tourism". I affords them several advantages. 1, they can have more children as the Chinese law allows for it. 2. Their child/ren are now US citizens; this provides a much better path to staying and obtaining top University access and prior higher education. And while it doesn't make it right, at last their the wealthy segment of the population that engage in dropping the anchor.

  18. Sounds like a salary cap to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So tech workers aren't allowed to make more than $60k/year.

  19. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by khallow · · Score: 1
    You also probably want the employee to have the ability to job hop. My view is pay money to get a green card for your employee.

    Remember, the idea is that hiring offshore is supposed to be a *last* resort

    Let's not waste our time with this. It's clearly not true or enforced.

  20. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    New tax, especially on business = dead in the House.

  21. raise the fee from 2000 to 100000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raise the fee from 2k to 100k and remove the 60k salary exemption. Every gets paid prevailing wage with no exceptions, every application is 100k fee to apply.

    This removes the "cheap labor" incentive and it clears the way for all of these supposed CEOs and such that are being kept out of the country by the awful quota system.

    Guarantee within a week, applications would drop to like 50 total and every one would be for high level geniuses, CEOs, etc. You know, the sort of vital people that the H1B people claim to actually be bringing over.

    1. Re:raise the fee from 2000 to 100000 by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Adding an 100k fee to *anything* will cause businesses to stop it for anything other than hiring CEOs (who I think get their own visa type).

      Which any business will point out to their congresscritters if they even thought of trying it. You're effectively outlawing H1-Bs, which they won't tolerate.

      I still like the idea of only handing out the H1-Bs to those who intend to pay their workers the *most* of all of the applicants over some minimum. Then you can't be accused of trying to torpedo the program, and the businesses have their own rhetoric backfire on them when they say that these people have "talent" they can't get in the USA. If they have "talent", they *should* be willing to pay the H1-Bs like they are "the talent".

  22. Make the fee exponential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming the goal is to spread the visa out to more companies, perhaps an [exponentially?] increasing application fee. For example: Base_Price x 1.002^(N-1).

  23. Scrap H1B use EB-1 by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The H1B program is broken in it's current form. It needs to be scrapped. Like other countries, e.g., Germany, the guest work visa program needs to be tightly monitored. No company should be allowed to flood the application process. No outsourcing or contractor companies should be allowed to apply, period. The reality is there is not shortage of STEM applicants. Plenty of qualified people. If you want to hire people from 3rd world countries, thereby undercutting labor rates, then locate your business there. You'll do more to help that country raise their standard of living by doing that. Not that you were truly interested in doing that.

    1. Re:Scrap H1B use EB-1 by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      If you want to hire people from 3rd world countries, thereby undercutting labor rates, then locate your business there. You'll do more to help that country raise their standard of living by doing that. Not that you were truly interested in doing that.

      In my experience, what seems to commonly happens in the UK when larger companies can't get the talent they desire on visas (I get the impression it's for cost reasons), is they just outsource all the work to a consultancy in another country. They end up paying more than intended and cut off more UK staff to meet expected earnings.

      Do you have any experience similar to this you could share?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  24. Simple solution by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As there is currently more visa applications than available visas, the solution can be very simple. Instead of lottery as it is done now, I would simply give visas to companies that plan to pay the highest salary. That would make companies to raise salaries if they really need applicants. That would also solve problems with definition of "prevailing wage" etc.

    --
    No sig today.
    1. Re:Simple solution by periodic · · Score: 1

      This is what I have been saying all along. A lottery is easily gamed by just flooding the system with a huge number of applications. For an off-shore company that is no problem.

    2. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does sound like the best solution.

      Self-fulfilling protocols are where things are at!

  25. Vote trump also there needs to be a min-wage by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    Vote trump also there needs to be a min-wage for h1B's say 80-90K base + COL so high cost places like the bay area the min can be say 150K also maybe even an X2 OT kicks in at 60+ hours a week from them.

    also any places with layoffs can't use hb1 / have a 3-6 mo opening time there they must look for US workers if they want to have an one.

    Also cap's on % of HB1's vs us works to stop the body shops from useing them at mass.

  26. Again ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

    Is it only me who always reads H-1B Virus?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re: Again ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it? It's killing the economy.

  27. How about just raising the minimum wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about just raising the minimum wage? I live in Europe, where things work a bit differently, but when I saw the $60k figure, I thought it must surely be a typo. I've never met somebody in IT, especially programmers, pulling less than €3,500 gross, plus benefits (car, laptop, phone, "13th month" annual bonus, supplementary health insurance...). Once you factor in those benefits, that would easily clear $70k or $80k, and this is for juniors.

    If somebody's services are only worth $60k, surely that is an indication that the market is providing those workers already? I really doubt that you are getting into workforce shortages until you hit six figures.

    1. Re:How about just raising the minimum wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $60k is not surprising to me. That is about what they are paying H1B's while local talent is in the $120k +benefits range.

    2. Re:How about just raising the minimum wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, not a typo. In some parts of the USA - commonly referred to as 'flyover country' - IT personnel with Linux sysadmin experience are lucky to make $30k to $40k/yr. IT personnel with just Windows experience make $25k to $35k/yr. Java, C# or even VB.NET Developers can make a whopping $35k to $45k/yr. InfoSys / TCS / et al. also outsource to the country, probably making a huge profit in the process.

  28. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Flat fee issue:

    Do you really want to incentivize the government to have offshore workers by making them profit centers for the government itself? How is that an incentive to avoid destroying domestic jobs?

    I'd think more like saying "H1B hires cost 3x the prevail wage for a job as determined by industry". Anyone not willing to pay up triple the cost can hire back the same folks they are firing now to save a buck. Anyone claiming this is not about companies saving a buck is being disingenuous. If there is truly not a single domestic worker able to fill the role, then paying extra for it should not be a problem. Looking at employment rates, and layoff/offshoring announcements I think these problems would fix itself pretty quickly given the right financial incentive.

    --
    Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
  29. H1-B program die die die by Gavrielkay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If there really were a shortage of tech workers, which I don't believe for a moment, the H1-B program is still about indentured servants. They should speed up/open up proper permanent residencies for these people so they come in with all the same rights and expectations of the Americans they are currently displacing. Holding them hostage to one company, training them to work well with Americans and then sending them home to lead off-shored teams is so bad for American workers that it's ridiculous.

    1. Re:H1-B program die die die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are corporations ready to pay $150k to $200k salaries after the H1-B program is gone?

    2. Re:H1-B program die die die by Gavrielkay · · Score: 1

      I imagine they would pay what it costs to get work done. They might even have to stop paying their CEOs $20M plus. Allowing companies to create indentured servants is just another way to funnel money from the bottom 99% to the top 1%. If pay scales get crazy, more people will study STEM and normal market processes of supply and demand will bring wages into an equilibrium. Short circuiting the market by bringing in cheap labor under false pretenses is what our gov't representatives are supposed to be protecting us from. Of course they've been bought out on both sides of the aisle and due to vote laziness (and craziness) have no reason to actually pay attention when rubber-stamping the laws they're given by their corporate overlords.

    3. Re:H1-B program die die die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $20M????

      I worked for a company that outsourced the whole IT department to an Indian firm. That year the CEO got a $125M bonus, on top of his $35M a year salary!

    4. Re:H1-B program die die die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paul Ryan will tell you to go fuck off right in your face. FUCK THE GOP, FUCK THE DNC!

    5. Re:H1-B program die die die by iamacat · · Score: 1

      If there really were a shortage of tech workers, which I don't believe for a moment

      I interview at least one person per week for a well known, desirable company. In the last year, not one has been able to write a half a page of code using two hashtables and rational thought - no gotcha insights required. I say there is in fact a huge shortage. Say, anyone wants to apply?

    6. Re:H1-B program die die die by eWarz · · Score: 1

      It's not that there is a shortage, it's that many folks with talent are already involved in other endeavors, and in addition, there is a huge influx of people who are new and simply want to earn more and are therefore are willing to apply to jobs beyond their skill level. Because of this, you need to be more aggressive about recruiting, and slightly less aggressive about the tests. You can't judge a good programmer by a half a page of code any more than you can judge a writer based on a half a paragraph of text.

    7. Re:H1-B program die die die by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      people will work for 50k. would keep rents reasonable too. really the six figure sums from jobs that are not done six figure even in northern europe is the problem of the american it hotspots and the reason for outsourcing being so lucrative.

      that the h1b has been modelled as debt servitude is just a byproduct.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:H1-B program die die die by Gavrielkay · · Score: 1

      Is the job located in a good area and your pay scale comparable to the cost of living? I've gotten a zillion job listings that are totally nuts... move to San Francisco for a 30% pay raise and a 400% cost of living increase - Yay! Err. No. Good people expect good things. I have no idea the position or pay your company is offering, but don't judge the whole market by your circumstances either.

  30. Re:Didn't know that prevailing wage loophole exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was called slavery remember? a few years ago?

  31. Re:Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever considered eating your own turds?

  32. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Americans are not willing to give green cards to Indians anymore... apply today and you might get one 30 years from now assuming you dont get laid off or retire in that time period

  33. Re:Didn't know that prevailing wage loophole exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If companies dont want to put employees on green cards, how do you explain the 20+ year backlog for employment based green cards for Indians? Americans dont want people on h1B to become permanent residents, not companies

  34. The biggest part of the prevailing wage scam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that the politicians wrote it to help businesses deceive the public - the public is supposed to say "oh, well if they are getting the same wages, obviously it will not hurt native-born workers" BUT the people being replaced are often long-time employees with seniority who have had increases in wages and benefits over their careers, and the new H1-B holders are brought-in at the "prevailing wage" for a new hire with no experience!!!! This is all a scam in which business bribes politicians to put a loophole into labor laws to let them push down wages and benefits. There is rampant unemployment in the US among well-trained and experienced STEM workers, over a million have become unemployed in just the past several years and every year thousands more graduate from colleges with most new US STEM graduates last year unable to find STEM jobs.

    I do not like Donald Trump, but until somebody else arises to even raise the immigration issues, he'll get my vote. The Democrats currently running have all announced their intentions of doubling-down on Obama's bad behavior, and Jeb! is on-board too. Rubio is Zuckerdude's man in the Senate. The US middle class has a lower net worth today than when Obama was sworn-in at the depths of the meltdown, and George W was every bit as bad - the middle class saw no net wage increase during his tenure.

  35. someone else gaming the system: by BradMajors · · Score: 1

    > "Mark Merkelbach and his small engineering firm in Seattle. For water projects in China, he needed engineers and landscapers who speak Mandarin"

    You can not make knowledge of a foreign language a requirement for an immigrant visa.

    1. Re:someone else gaming the system: by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      Why not?

    2. Re:someone else gaming the system: by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      Because 90% of the employers would add knowledge of Hindi as a essential requirement to their job description and thereby make it much easier for the contracting firm to prove no American citizen meets the job requirements.

    3. Re:someone else gaming the system: by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking... they should be able to make a language a reason to hire overseas, that is a valuable skill.

      However, they should be challenging the company about why they need that for every programmer or admin, and that is the problem. The government is the gatekeeper, but it doesn't even know who to let through the gate. It just listens to the lobbyists tell them all about how there is a "shortage" of workers.

      Let the market decide by only giving H1-Bs to the companies willing to pay the most to fill those slots. End the random lottery and make it salary dependent. Companies that really need that skillset will pay for it. The ones who don't, will find another way. Then you need to keep them from outsourcing, which would be next.

  36. Not enough... THINK about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every American worker who used to have a middle-class life with a STEM job used to (1) be saving money for his/her retirement, getting a pension established, etc AND (2) be paying into Social Security at a high rate to both pay for his/her future benefits and also help fund the benefits of many American workers with lesser jobs.

    Every American STEM worker replaced by an H1-B is going to be made doubly-dependent upon Social Security and Medicare, while paying less into both and also not helping pay in enough to support others with lower-wage jobs. In a sane world without corrupt, bribed politicians an employer bringing in an H1-B would have to prove that there is no American who is PHYSICALLY able to be trained to do the job - and then a fee of 3 or 4 times the average prevailing wage top management of the firm should be assessed.

    Ideally, H1-B visas should not exist and any employers attempting to replace their workforces with cheap foreigners should be prosecuted for treason, in a mass-trial, and put before a firing squad; they want all the benefits of the stable American system and markets and all the rights that the Constitutional Republic of "we the people" provided, but then want to sell-out the nation to line their pockets. There's little difference between these jokers and the business men who sold technology and equipment and raw materials to Germany and Japan between WWI and WWII.

    1. Re:Not enough... THINK about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      they want all the benefits of the stable American system and markets and all the rights that the Constitutional Republic of "we the people" provided, but then want to sell-out the nation to line their pockets.

      I just can't wrap my mind around who these companies think will be buying their products and services if they keep replacing the domestic workforce with temporary foreigners. Eventually there won't be a middle class American to buy those big screen tvs, SUVs, smartphones, etc.

    2. Re:Not enough... THINK about it... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      They don't have a big picture of the economy. They only know that they need to drop their prices, which means dropping expenses. Manpower is a big expense, so they try and economize on that. Nothing rewards them for caring about that big picture.

      You'd think the government would have a solution for big picture issues, but they're the ones allowing this to happen. Just like they're allowing the immigration crisis to occur. You want to get rid of illegal aliens? Investigate and prosecute the businesses that hire them. The problem is that no one wants prices to go up or be seen as responsible for it, and prices will definitely go up if these companies get prosecuted and must use American workers.

      Now, prices going up is not necessarily a bad thing *if* the population is making more money. It's all a balancing game.

      To be honest, though, I feel that protecting national jobs is an untenable situation in the long term. You create a wealth disparity between haves and have-nots throughout the world, which can eventually be taken advantage of by the unscrupulous. That's what was done by colonialism where inequitable trading arrangements have caused significant problems all around the world.

      I'd say if there is any of these solutions I support, it would probably be the one that allows H1-Bs for only the highest paid visa candidates on the list. That seems like it is the best fit for H1-B is supposed to be. If these guys are specialists, unattainable in the US by any other means, then they need to be paid like specialists.

    3. Re:Not enough... THINK about it... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Where do you work in an industry that manpower is a huge expense? I paid staff very well and they cost me less than it cost to keep the copy room going. The copy room was like 12k/month with supplies. Most engineers and programmers started at 120k depending on experience. Granted, we did a lot of printing, but still. Hell, power and AC for the server room was damned expensive. Software licensing was pretty rough. I think Sun made more from us than anyone else did, at least for a while. (Scaling out was costly and decent workstations were damned expensive.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Not enough... THINK about it... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think $120k is NOT a huge expense, at least relatively? The cost of running all of our servers in production, development and demo is less than the amount of money spent per year on my team, even forgetting about their benefits.

      Of course, if you're using Sun equipment, and possibly things like Oracle, I guess I'm starting to understand. I'm very sorry you have to deal with that. I used to work at places like that.

      I was quoted $150,000 for a license of Oracle once. I nearly laughed myself to death. I went to the CEO and said, "well you can buy this, which isn't even much more than Oracle Standard and some crap replication, or you could just use MySQL for free, not hire six DBAs and get about the same level of shittiness and lack of support."

      Note I never said MySQL was good, I just said that Oracle isn't better unless you pay them two million dollars. And then pay them two million more when they do an audit and find out your people have been using "unlicensed" features like AWR reporting which they just sort of let you do and then trick you into admitting that you use later.

      Sun hardware was pretty decent when I was using it, but overpriced and overengineered for the things it was actually used for. I did enjoy talking to the SSE's when they came in to change some memory or a CPU module, though.

    5. Re:Not enough... THINK about it... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      My company, sold now, did traffic modeling. We did allow Oracle a shot at our database but, well, after three months and absolutely zero success they insisted we owed them money and took us to court.

      As for labor? Pfft... I don't pay that. You paid that. I bill for that, it's in the contract. The municipality has a choice to sign or not. I need quality employees who will do quality work because failure has huge penalties. So, employees get paid (albeit indirectly) by the contract. Things like other assets are more fuzzy. Racks of blade servers can't really be shoveled off as a single expense on one client. Those get amortized. They're damned expensive.

      Consider also, if you will, that we were working with data sets that were nearing a full terabyte, by the late 1990s. Hardware was expensive... Like I mentioned, the copy room cost more than an employee. Contract with Xerox, or even a third party vendor, for consumables, maintenance, and replacements and then add in a couple of 8' plotters and that starts to build up - quickly. Rent on office buildings, then construction on two new ones, then renting three more and taxes?

      Software? Heh... Oracle was pricey but failed to deliver. Everything cost a small fortune and bandwidth was obscene back then. I sold in 2008 and retired but, at the time, getting a decent SLA was insanely expensive. Sun, bless them, was at least nice enough to actually hold up their end of the bargain where support was concerned. They even helped us write special drivers, at one point. Have you seen an enterprise contract price for same day support from Sun? It's a larger figure than Oracle quoted and that was a yearly price.

      No, no... The fleshy piles of meat that fed the computers were an expense but they were an asset that had a high return on investment and I could shunt those fees off much more easily. Their benefits were a bit pricey but that's okay. They were worth it. Sure, the rest has a return on investment and is a necessity but - all things considered - they people who worked with me were a good value for the dollar. Without them, I'd have had no business at all. They were priceless and what I paid was quite a bit less than their worth. On the budget, at the end of a quarter, they weren't even really in the top ten list as I recall. Just redundant network provisioning was expensive, never mind the bill for air conditioning.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  37. tax layoffs at $100K per job if H1Bs are on staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To prevent the abuse of H1B visas replacing Americans, tax the company at $100K per layoff, and give that money to the laid off worker.

    There is no talent shortage, only excuses to lay off US workers to replace them with cheap labor.

  38. Indentured Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, to lock in the employee the outsourcers provide "loans" to the visa holders to cover relocation costs, and the loans are "forgiven" upon completion of their contract, when they return to India.

    1. Re:Indentured Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And this is different from indentured servitude how?

  39. Re:tax layoffs at $100K per job if H1Bs are on sta by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    To prevent the abuse of H1B visas replacing Americans, tax the company at $100K per layoff, and give that money to the laid off worker.

    So then before they lay everyone off they transfer all of them to a subsidiary with no H1-Bs then shut down said subsidiary. Tax avoided.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  40. Re: A better idea - for some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies like IBM just ship everything to India.

    When dealing with engineering, sending work back and forth happens in milliseconds.

    And the trend is to just send STEM work overseas - to places like India.

    Millions of smart cheap people. GEs CEO on Charlie Rose back in June said they were recruiting in Silicn Vally and India - sorry smart kid who went to State and did well. Better get you ass to Silly Valley to be taken seriously! Or be happy working one of those companies who do Facebook pages for $49.

    So unless you are a great student at a top school, it's going to be real hard to get a job in those STEM fields - contrary to the hype and propaganda.

  41. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by vovin · · Score: 1

    Because you can lie about the prevailing wage.
    You can't fudge your way around a flat fee.

  42. India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't like how the article kept emphasizing India. There's plenty from Canada and Brazil. Racism/nationalism are not cool, okay?

  43. This is just union bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of the claims in this article are true, they just sound like the paranoid rantings of some lunatic leftist with a hate-on for successful companies. For the life of me I don't understand why slashdot allows these kinds of idiotic leftist posts.

  44. How about free movement of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is always talk of a free market in everything except labor. The western countries always talk about countries having to open their markets for goods and unhindered movement of currency/investment in and out of all countries, but never talk about a free/open market for labor. Why are western countries against free movement of labor?

    1. Re:How about free movement of people by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Because they're trying to maintain an artificially high standard of living against the rest of the world which is relatively impoverished.

      They're riding the tiger. They know that they can't maintain this standard of living forever, something will equalize it, but due to the need to get votes, they don't dare feed the population a dose of bitter medicine. So, they just shrug and try and hold on as long as they can and hope they are dead when reality comes to roost.

       

    2. Re: How about free movement of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this is called sovereignty: an American has more rights on his land than a foreigner on USA. And the opposite is true (or else it would be called colonialism).

      The solution to different standard of living is not opening the borders but development of all the countries, starting with education.

  45. Re:Coren22 likes failing security & coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF, dude. Do you have damned script that scrapes for Coren's posts and just spams this shit?

    Go away. Nobody cares about your hosts file or about whatever Coren did to piss you off.

  46. There is no talent gap especially in programming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At my work place the majority of the H1B Visa consultant are .Net programmers. Believe me that being a .Net programmer is not difficult and that there are tens of thousands of .Net programmers. So we shouldn't be importing any. And if we need more then send a CS grad to a boot camp for a month.

    BTW, the secret reason why India has so much talent is that they made it up. You ten thousand .net program then the type the word on their resume. Instant .Net programmer.

  47. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you really want to incentivize the government to have offshore workers by making them profit centers for the government itself? How is that an incentive to avoid destroying domestic jobs?

    You earmark the flat fee to go towards funding the enforcement of the H1B program rules. Any surplus goes to fund worker re-training programs.

    This way enforcing the rules of the program is self-funding, and congress can't defund enforcement "because business" and the larger and more popular it is, the more enforcement can be funded.

    Plus, you're basically forcing employers who "need" to hire cheap offshore help to also (provided there is a surplus, and at $50k per, there should be) fund worker retraining so the people needed to do the job can be found at home.

  48. Nothing Says US Iron like Outsourcing to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At Hardley-Davidsin (my favorite condom name/trade-mark infringement), Keith Wandell made $23 million the same year he fired 200 IT workers. Made the jobs all external and wonder of all wonders, who got the contract? Infosys. As an engineer at Harley said to me, as I slaved for 6 months to train the 15 Indians who eventually replaced me, "Nothing says Amierican Iron like outsourcing to India". 3 of those Indians moved to Milwaukee. The rest are in India, probably making $10 an hour. Wandell has since retired, somehow he was able to afford it, but he will always be the biggest scum bag in all of business to me. I hope his ink leaks through his pocket protector and at least one of his mistresses has the crabs.

    1. Re:Nothing Says US Iron like Outsourcing to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be more positive.

    2. Re: Nothing Says US Iron like Outsourcing to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because things are looking so good? I'm in the public sector and am luck to be making 35k/yr as a programmer/analyst (sysadmin/networking/Web developer/anything else required). I would absolutely love to make 60k/yr. Rent alone currently consumes 3/4 of my income (and it ain't the Taj MA Hal). Then there is student loans, car payments (required for the job), and oh yeah, food if I can afford it this month. Welcome to the new, semi-third-world America.

  49. Re:Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a disgusting stalker, apk.

  50. What is the end game to gutting the middle class? by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just what is the end game to gutting the middle class, anyway?

    Is the whole goal here just to have like 3 people who control 99.99999% of the wealth?

    Surely once the the middle class is denuded, they'll start going for the "HENRYs" (high earners, not rich yet) and find a way to strip them of their earning potential and wealth, too.

    At least in ancient Rome the emperors would stage feasts, festivals and games.

  51. Make the job be posted and vetted by the gov by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The job that they want an H1B for must be presented to the government and a $10k fee paid to the government to cover expenses. The government will interview qualified candidates and if the company does not take one of them, they do not get an H1B either. If no qualified candidates are found, the salary is raised until a qualified candidate is found, up to a maximum of 3 standard deviations from the average salary for the position. If there are still no qualified candidates, then you can have an H1b.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  52. Wages they can't even be offered. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    Yep, in reality with this and even the farming jobs. The truth is "wages that Americans won't accept".

    Not just that. They're at wages that can't even be offered. For instance: Some (not all) of the social programs where H1-B workers aren't eligible don't require the employer contribution. So hiring a US worker - even at the same pay - is substantially more expensive.

    One of the problems is that, in a very competitive environment where labor costs are large compared to differences in process costs, if ONE competitor takes advantage of a cheat and another does not, the non-cheater loses the competitive bids. Thus, if the regulations aren't enforced, all must cheat or go out of business.

    One place you see this is in the construction industry, with the "undocumented" workers. US workers need not apply (and the jobs aren't offered.) Contractors can't stay in business employing them at mandated minimum wages, benefit levels, and safety standards (which they CAN get the government to enforce) when their competitors can hire workers for less and cheat on all of the above - which those not here legally can't try to get enforced without risking deportation, but can afford to live on (especially if their family is on public assistance).

    So if the government is going to put these regulations in place, it must enforce them. The "Invisible Hand" will deliver a knockout punch to anybody who follows expensive, but unenforced, rules.

    At competitive wages, you can always find people willing to do the job.

    Yep. The trick is to keep the playing field level.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  53. Re:First Post - Star Wars by Bratch · · Score: 2

    And everyone will still go watch Star Wars The Force Awakens, making them more money, and nothing happens.

    --
    Beware of the Redittor who loans you a Sharpie.
  54. Sanders voted to eliminate H1b in 2007 by Ixpath · · Score: 1

    Just saying. Raising the min-wage won't fix the problem of being locked into a specific company.

  55. Re:There is no talent gap especially in programmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you can't find a CS grad?

  56. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by youngone · · Score: 1

    Of course this about companies saving money. They have bought the rules, as set by government, in such a way that there's some sort of fig leaf protection for American jobs, but really the system is designed to drive the cost of labour down.

  57. Re:What is the end game to gutting the middle clas by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    The problem is that you believe it is a conspiracy. It is nothing of the sort. It is a mechanism that is off the rails, and everyone is going along for the ride. Some people get insanely rich off of it, the rest get run over.

    However, don't think for a minute that this is a plan. There is no plan, only short term gain and stupid investors.

    There are vast inequalities of opportunity in the world, and those can be used to the advantage of those who are willing to break down those barriers. The hope is that eventually, a fully globalized market will stabilize salaries and the ability to hire cheap Indians or Vietnamese will no longer exist, but it's going to hurt all the way down.

    People believe that the free market is a choice. It's not. Market forces are a system that operates outside of any policy decision, and it will ensure that it gets what it wants, which is an equilibrium. As communication and the ability to trade all over the world increases, the barriers that were used to maintain protectionism become more and more artificial and rickety. This is the result. It may be that the only way that we protect ourselves is to ensure that those across the sea are successful and our partners, driving up their standard of living to a point where they have more in common with us.

  58. An even better idea by Ixpath · · Score: 1

    Eliminate the H1B program, increase the quota for skilled Greencard holders (EB1, EB3). Wage problem solved because workers can leave if they are paid poorly.

  59. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course this about companies saving money. They have bought the rules, as set by government, in such a way that there's some sort of fig leaf protection for American jobs, but really the system is designed to drive the cost of labour down.

    But what is interesting is that there's little empirical evidence this is bringing costs down. Obviously some things can be outsourced more successfully than others, but many companies that do this bite off more than they can chew. It's easy to compare hourly rates for labor, but much harder to measure the incremental extra labor that is needed to get something done right, the layers of management, contracting, and SLA reviews that get put into place in most outsourced models, the the cost of poor quality, opportunity costs in bringing innovation to the market slower than your competitors, etc.

    Skill = knowledge + experience, and the large outsourcers can't bring the experience. Offshore they subcontract themselves to meet flexible demand, and the people they bring or hire onshore are rarely better or cheaper (and generally are not better AND cheaper) than a full time employee would be in the long term.

  60. Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "APK doesn't think that DNS servers are worth running and seems to believe that somehow Microsoft Active Directory can run without DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:58PM (#50811615)

    Where'd I say AD will run minus DNS Coren22? I've said AD = internal network DNS dependent as far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    (Search this in BOLD there "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers!" referring to OpenDNS suggestions for those using AD stupid in the POSTS BEFORE IT in my security guides for users (geared to stand alone single machines no less), & right there on that page proves it stupid - so even if you posted as myself someplace here on /. "impersonating me", I have your ass NOW, shithead!)

    I've also stated MANY TIMES I use remote DNS in OpenDNS @ home (but not @ work on AD networks + exchange/outlook: Free OpenDNS model doesn't work with AD dependent Exchange + Outlook specifically you lying little imbecile).

    I also don't hardcode in "every site there is under the sun" is why, so I have to use DNS, but OpenDNS & rarely.

    I also RARELY MISS A LOOKUP since I put where I spend a good 95++% of my time online in my favorite sites into hosts @ the TOP of hosts for utmost LOCAL FASTER RESOLUTION SPEEDS and more reliability vs. Open DNS (not OpenDNS) resolvers being abused, Kaminsky redirect poisoned DNS servers (of which 99.999% of ISP DNS are not proofed against to this very day even though a patch exists which OpenDNS uses), rogue DNS servers, and yes ROUTERS with bushwhacked by malware DNS settings (happening a LOT lately).

    Hardcodes in hosts are faster than remote DNS, waste less resources than local dns in power, cpu cycles, RAM, & other I/O by FAR considering ALL THE PARTS of such a setup in programs, data, I/O, & power (especially if setup as a separate machine).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a disgusting liar... apk

  61. Coren22 likes failing security & coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 says "hosts=bad" (they add security, speed, & reliability) & bitches on admin priv to UPDATE vs. threats

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    & admits using admin priv himself

    +

      How else can I programmatically update hosts minus it in Windows?

    ---

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    You FINALLY later admit there's no other way!

    FACT:

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware (best one) DEMANDS you use admin privelege (you saying it's "bad" too?) it can't do its job fully otherwise, like many security tools do!

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly - Coren22, there is a CURE for your "outism" due to your retarded by assburgers clearly defective brain (lol) - quit making childish sigs about me & sockpuppet accounts as well as telling lies about me - I'll stop OUTING you "signature boy" troll... apk

  62. Re:Didn't know that prevailing wage loophole exist by Pontiac · · Score: 1

    H1B to fill jobs they can't find people for.

    HA

    I guess that is why my old Co-Workers at Catholic Health had to train their H1B replacements to do their own jobs before they were laid off. Clearly they couldn't find anyone to do the job other than the people already doing it.

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  63. Coren22 likes being bitchslapped 65++:1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    More "SALT IN YOUR WOUNDS" -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    APK

    P.S.=> /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ... apk

  64. Coren22 can't keep his word... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & links where I tried to make peace - says it all w/ proof of it from his trolling "signature boy" mouth http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & here too http://slashdot.org/comments.p... + here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (I've discovered that trying to make peace with a mental retard due to assbergers & OUTISM is a difficult thing & largely apparently unachievable...)

    APK

    P.S.=> You brought it on yourself Coren22, nobody else - you sow the wind? Here comes the whirlwind, & all your sockpuppets, signatures, & fellow trolls can't stop it (lol, you're 'outta bullets' in downmods) - so "the beatings will continue" until you stop your immature childish signature bs... apk

  65. Coren likes to be crushed (crushing himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Says it all & this link, dismantling him point-by-"so-called 'point'" of his publicly http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (Coren22, I tried to give you a chance, 3x no less - you're a fool: You mistake mercy for weakness, like cretin brutes in the streets do... you paid the price!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I notice you stopped responding there - "Gosh, golly gee - why's that?" (not) - but I expect you'll TRY some more b.s. as that's all "your kind" (trolls) understand - crap like downmodding my posts (which you & your sockpuppets OR fellow trolls have here already NOW TELLING OTHERS TO TROLL ME BY UNIDENTIFIABLE AC POSTS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I've torn you ALL up 1 by 1 every time as I have yourself above... you did this, to yourself "signature boy")... apk

    1. Re: Coren likes to be crushed (crushing himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's getting to the point that half the threads are being hijacked by these two assholes...

    2. Re: Coren likes to be crushed (crushing himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to blame someone? Blame the retard Coren22 who is a mentally defective genetic waste aspergers autistic freak who made even more freaks supposedly but I doubt any bitch would fuck a punk like him to make a kid. Motherfucker's a liar and the posts all show it. He puts up his signatures to cause trouble as he's a butthurt little FUCK that can't handle he fucked up against the other guy.

    3. Re: Coren likes to be crushed (crushing himself) by dave420 · · Score: 0

      APK, do you think everyone else here is as gullible as you are? We know it's you. You have an alternative style when you are pretending to be someone else, but the deranged focus still shines on through. You need help. Stalking people who disagree with your claims/software/sanity is not going to prove them wrong.

    4. Re: Coren likes to be crushed (crushing himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *** SMACK*** is the sound of dave420 going down eating his words getting bitchslapped by apk http://slashdot.org/comments.p... hahahaha

    5. Re: Coren likes to be crushed (crushing himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet his toupe flew off his dumb skull and his shoes felll off with that one. Notice he's quiet? He got knocked the fuck OUT for being a dumb shit with a big mouth hahahahahahaha

    6. Re: Coren likes to be crushed (crushing himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Inquiring minds want to know' how did it taste eating your words imbecile?

  66. Re:Coren22 likes failing security & coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 you care. I see how you operate telling others to troll apk by unidentifiable ac posts now doing it yourself http://slashdot.org/comments.p... and failing there too? Grow up. Quit trolling your betters and losing.

  67. Re:Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 speak for yourself hypocrite. Apk ruined you where you told others to stalk him by ac posts as you're doing http://slashdot.org/comments.p... you failed there on computer tech too. Grow up. Quit trolling your betters, doing signatures, being a fail in computing and losing.

  68. Re:Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22's eating his and apk's dust http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  69. Re:What is the end game to gutting the middle clas by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Just what is the end game to gutting the middle class, anyway?

    Frighting that you do not already know this, sincerely.

    The -entire point- is to crate a have / have-not society; which BTW is the norm throughout human history. The concept of a "middle class" is but an aberration. Be it communism or fascism, by any other name it's feudal. In a democracy, people vote not for whom they like, but rather out of fear their "benefits" will be taken away. Think of it as indentured servitude.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  70. Quotas by Country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you want to put a quick brake on this, just impose quotas by nationality
    of the candidate. This is done for other things, so why not H1-B? You can
    bias the quotas by size of the nation (population, GDP or whatever), but since
    such a large percentage are from South Asia, that will quickly rebalance it.
    And it would hardly be unfair or racist, since it is just introducing diversity
    into the process, where there is none now (since the Indian companies
    almost exclusively hire Indians where possible).

  71. Re:What is the end game to gutting the middle clas by Xyrus · · Score: 2

    At least in ancient Rome the emperors would stage feasts, festivals and games.

    McDonald's, New Year's Eve, NFL.

    The end game of capitalism? The French Revolution. You can only push people so far. There's a point where the laws of society and morality lose their meaning, usually soon after the masses start starving and suffering. At that point it doesn't matter how many guns or gates you have. You're not going to stop an angry mob who thinks they have nothing left to lose and view death as a reprieve from a tormented life.

    --
    ~X~
  72. Re:What is the end game to gutting the middle clas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No End Game.
    It is about the Here and Now, this Quarter, this years bonus.

    If I do not do it my competitors will.
    The Future is the futures problem, I got mine.

  73. Needs also scale with population by iamacat · · Score: 1

    These H1Bs are an infusion of folks who are paid $60K, which is higher than average US income, into US population. They are now travelling, eating out in restaurants, sending their kids to daycare and buying computer hardware and software. When otherwise, they would spend their disposable income in India or whatever country they come from.

    The only practical downside is restriction on transferring between jobs, which depress wages for both H1B holders and US citizens. Give folks a year to either find another US job or put their affairs in order and leave. Every other objection is plain irrational prejudice*.

    * Obviously, entire 7 billion of Earth population can not move to North America. Luckily not everyone wants so, and imposing a sensible requirement of supporting oneself and earning a lower middle class salary narrows to influx to manageable numbers.

    1. Re:Needs also scale with population by eWarz · · Score: 2

      Yes, but $60k/year is NOT the typical income for IT workers or software engineers. The median income for software engineers for example is around $92k.

  74. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    The naiveté is strong with this one! Earmarking Federal income means nothing. Never has, never will.

  75. And it's not just H1Bs, it's also Green Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the companies mentioned here also have a backdoor to the H1B system. If the company sends an employee overseas, the employee still remains a manager and gets a green card or permanent residency within 6 months (in "EB-1 Category" reserved for scientists and individuals with exceptional abilities) - all this while earning much lesser than what an American would! No need to skirt the H1-B rules thereafter yet exploiting the system.

  76. Re:What is the end game to gutting the middle clas by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

    There is no grand plan, conspiracy or end game. There are just a bunch of people who would rather be the king of a mound of shit than a prince on a mountain of gold, enabled by a second bunch of people who would see the world go to hell in a bucket so long as they get to touch the handle.

  77. So, basically, you were able to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that labor was not a big cost FOR YOU - because you shifted that to the taxpayer.

    Got it.

    See? That's a perfect example of the way government completely distorts things just by being involved in them. For any normal business, the workers are likely to be the largest expense; there are a few examples involving large-scale high-tech where the people are not the big expense, but that's not the norm in business.

    1. Re:So, basically, you were able to say... by KGIII · · Score: 2

      From the other business owners that I know, I'm involved in a few now, they cite similar things. One owns a small computer repair shop with a few employees. Another, has maybe 500 employees in a bunch of fast food franchises, and the another owns a web hosting company - leases a few good sized cages in a couple of data centers in the US. All of them cite the same things. We talk about this extensively. I chose those few to mention specifically because their disparate. I know law firm owners, a guy who has a medical practice, etc... It could, easily, be the industries that I'm most familiar with or you're being lied to by your bosses. Take a look at some corporate filings for publicly traded businesses.

      I'm a bit lazy so you can either search or believe me or wait until I am less lazy but I think the labor costs, as an itemized expense under overhead, is something like 17% averaged across the entire work force? Something like that, at any rate. Some higher, some lower, of course. The last time I found and cited the stats they were from BLS as I recall. It was not that long ago. So, while I did shunt the expense (included them as a cost) so doesn't every other business. You're not just buying parts when you buy a car, you're paying the labor also. It's a circular thing, I guess. The people I employed, for instance, paid higher taxes and paid a proportion greater than most to the municipalities that got improvements through their labor.

      All-in-all, it wasn't that huge of an expense in the debit column and under the overhead header. I believe it's another 2-3% for benefits. We probably spent more on perks and office supplies than we spent on a secretary and even those were paid well. Bonuses don't come under labor costs, they're itemized separately. Those were a bit much but it is important to remember that without them you'd have no business at all. Paying bonuses for quality work is a very good motivator and allows people to share in the success of the company.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  78. Re:Didn't know that prevailing wage loophole exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies don't want that, which is why the H1Bs work the way they do ... because that's what industry wanted./quote?

    Nobody wanted it. I can't think of anyone in the industry who thinks it's a good idea except executive-level management who are so far removed from it that they don't care about the consequences. I've started thinking it's as much an immigration scheme or perks for the people "back home" as much as anything else. When it's done through a consulting company it's not that much cheaper than hiring local permies anyway.

  79. There is no such law making them citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some unelected judges have asserted that a Chinese man long ago who was born to parents in the US LEGALLY was a citizen (by virtue of the post-Civil-War Constitutional amendment that forced southern Democrats to accept that the children of former slaves were American Citizens by birth) but that ruling did not specifically apply to the US-born child of illegal aliens. THAT scenario has NEVER been put to the Supreme Court for a ruling.

    The current supreme court is so far to the loony left that it would probably rule in favor of "anchor babies", since it WAS the same court that ruled that President Obama has the right to order every American to buy any particular commercial product he wants to order them to buy...... but the historical fact is that this specific scenario of anchor babies is untested in the courts and it's wrong therefore to pretend that it has been.

  80. Example of countries in Europe Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just let everybody in. Problem solved !
    Joke aside, the other side of the problem for H1B is the lack of stability since the H1B document is the property of the company not of the individual, and the spouse H4 document depends on the H1B validity. H4 does not allow to work or even search for work.
    Suppose an H1B is laid off, he must leave the USA the same day or find a job in 30 days. With kids, spouse, dogs, car and house, do you think it is doable ?
    The Green Card also needs a corporate sponsor.
    The consequence: H1B will attract people which have little to lose, without kids or spouse, poorer than average, not willing to buy house, from third-world countries. You bet they can accept lower wages !

    I once studied the opportunity of staying after a J-1 in 2001. But H1B slavery was not for me. It's only some years ago that I understood why H1B is so harsh even for european people: we are your vassal countries after all !

  81. Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "APK doesn't think that DNS servers are worth running and seems to believe that somehow Microsoft Active Directory can run without DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:58PM (#50811615)

    Where'd I say AD will run minus DNS Coren22? I've said AD = internal network DNS dependent as far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    (Search this in BOLD there "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers!" referring to OpenDNS suggestions for those using AD stupid in the POSTS BEFORE IT in my security guides for users (geared to stand alone single machines no less), & right there on that page proves it stupid - so even if you posted as myself someplace here on /. "impersonating me", I have your ass NOW, shithead!)

    I've also stated MANY TIMES I use remote DNS in OpenDNS @ home (but not @ work on AD networks + exchange/outlook: Free OpenDNS model doesn't work with AD dependent Exchange + Outlook specifically you lying little imbecile).

    I also don't hardcode in "every site there is under the sun" is why, so I have to use DNS, but OpenDNS & rarely.

    I also RARELY MISS A LOOKUP since I put where I spend a good 95++% of my time online in my favorite sites into hosts @ the TOP of hosts for utmost LOCAL FASTER RESOLUTION SPEEDS and more reliability vs. Open DNS (not OpenDNS) resolvers being abused, Kaminsky redirect poisoned DNS servers (of which 99.999% of ISP DNS are not proofed against to this very day even though a patch exists which OpenDNS uses), rogue DNS servers, and yes ROUTERS with bushwhacked by malware DNS settings (happening a LOT lately).

    Hardcodes in hosts are faster than remote DNS, waste less resources than local dns in power, cpu cycles, RAM, & other I/O by FAR considering ALL THE PARTS of such a setup in programs, data, I/O, & power (especially if setup as a separate machine).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a disgusting liar... apk

  82. Coren22 likes failing security & coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 says "hosts=bad" (they add security, speed, & reliability) & bitches on admin priv to UPDATE vs. threats

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    & admits using admin priv himself

    +

      How else can I programmatically update hosts minus it in Windows?

    ---

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    You FINALLY later admit there's no other way!

    FACT:

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware (best one) DEMANDS you use admin privelege (you saying it's "bad" too?) it can't do its job fully otherwise, like many security tools do!

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly - Coren22, there is a CURE for your "outism" due to your retarded by assburgers clearly defective brain (lol) - quit making childish sigs about me & sockpuppet accounts as well as telling lies about me - I'll stop OUTING you, immature retarded bastard assburgers outism "signature boy" troll PUNK motherfucker... apk

  83. Coren22 likes being bitchslapped 65++:1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    More "SALT IN YOUR WOUNDS" -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    APK

    P.S.=> /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ... apk

  84. Coren22 gets crushed (& he ran) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Says it all & this link, dismantling him point-by-"so-called 'point'" of his publicly http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (Coren22, I tried to give you a chance, 3x no less - you're a fool: You mistake mercy for weakness, like cretin brutes in the streets do... you paid the price!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I notice you stopped responding there - "Gosh, golly gee - why's that?" (not) - but I expect you'll TRY some more b.s. as that's all "your kind" (trolls) understand - crap like downmodding my posts or ac troll me!

    (Which you & your sockpuppets OR fellow trolls have here already NOW TELLING OTHERS TO TROLL ME BY UNIDENTIFIABLE AC POSTS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I've torn you ALL up 1 by 1 every time as I have yourself above... you did this, to yourself "signature boy")... apk

  85. Re:What is the end game to gutting the middle clas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > At least in ancient Rome the emperors would stage feasts, festivals and games.

    The U.S. stages game shows, elections and wars.

  86. Re:Coren22 likes failing security & coding by dave420 · · Score: 1

    APK, you admitted doing this yourself. How can you condemn someone for doing something you do yourself? Oh yeah - "APK" - that's how.

  87. Re:Didn't know that prevailing wage loophole exist by naris · · Score: 1

    Actually, H1B serves exactly this purpose, which is why so many tech firms are clamoring to expand it.

  88. So, do you work for an offshoring company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or an outsourcing company?

    I'm positive you are.

  89. Explain To Me... by kackle · · Score: 2

    Can someone tell me WHY we need such a system at all? I doubt that we are importing only once-in-100-years mega-geniuses, so is it worth all the cost and problems and cheating and vigilance and unemployment? I don't see how...

  90. Start a list! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to add MICROCHIP to the list of companies trying to game the H1B system. I know multiple well-qualified people that went in for a systems administration interview, were questioned about programming (C++, not scripting like powershell), programming theory, and many things that have absolutely nothing to do with sysadmin. Then the manager turns the interview over to 3 H1B's to ask questions and no one can understand them, not even the manager. Pretty obvious when you end up with a fake interview like this versus a real one where the company has actually read your resume and knows your skill sets before you interview. Total scammers.

  91. Re:What is the end game to gutting the middle clas by swb · · Score: 1

    It's funny, after I wrote that I did a Google search for inequality in ancient Rome.

    http://persquaremile.com/2011/...

    According to this article that summarizes the work of some academics, Rome actually had a more equal Gini coefficient than contemporary America.

    It's obviously an estiimate, although these guys did some deep work analyzing some of the ancient records left over to try to dial in numbers that were probably pretty close.

  92. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by mileshigh · · Score: 1

    OK, call it a "fee." For, ya know, enhanced security screening and whatnot.

    The other beauty of making the fee payable directly to the gov't is that the employer can't extort the money back from the employee.

  93. Re:A better idea, just needs better implemenation by mileshigh · · Score: 1

    You also probably want the employee to have the ability to job hop.

    Why free agents? I thought the idea was to fill specific job posts that Americans can't do -- not to expand the general labor pool.

    last resort... clearly not true or enforced

    Impose a $50K price tag and it will very quickly become last resort. And enforced.

  94. Re: A better idea, just needs better implemenation by backslashdot · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with saving a few dollars? None of the tech jobs I know of pay a non-living wage. Frankly why should a tech job pay any more than at McDonald's anyway? Who gets to decide which job what the value of a job is. Working at McDonald's is just as difficult as working for a tech company.

  95. Dave420's full of it & his words (eating 'em) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Everyone who does use HOSTS files (myself included) doesn't use your software" - by dave420 (699308) on Thursday November 05, 2015 @07:30AM (#50869743)

    A small sampling of /.'ers say my work is good who use my hosts file engine quoted:

    ---

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ... apk

    ---

    * So, what's that you said I have quoted above Dave420? LMAO... you FAIL as usual, again, vs. me!

    APK

    P.S.=> Do you have ANY idea how many of these I have bookmarked in your constant failures in trolling me, especially on hosts? 50 of them and the result is always like this one is - you say something I can put away with undeniable fact that proves you wrong... lol!

    Thanks for making me look good, & yourself? Well - lmao, "not so good"... apk

  96. Re:Coren22 likes failing security & coding by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is, I don't post AC, I only ever post under this name.

    I've told him this repeatedly, but he is just so ingrained in his methods, he just assumes any AC calling him out must be the same person, it couldn't possibly be a totally different person that sees his errors.

    Oh, and thanks for the laugh.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  97. And one more reason by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Expel Brahmin From Your Country; http://wh.gov/iyhMK

  98. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #1/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #1/2... apk

    "APK doesn't think that DNS servers are worth running & seems to believe that somehow Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:58PM (#50811615)

    Where'd I say AD will run minus DNS Coren22? I've said AD needs internal network DNS as far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    (Search this in BOLD there "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers!" as to OpenDNS for those using AD in the POSTS BEFORE IT in my security guide (for stand alone single machines))

    ---

    YOU ADMIT I WAS RIGHT on admin privelege + hosts UPDATING (WFP/SFP) & no other way for me to do it for AUTOMATIC UPDATES (key) & you use admin priv too hypocrite!

    ---

    Guess what?

    You don't NEED TO RUN MY PROGRAM AS ADMIN - I do it everyday that way here DRAGGING HOSTS TO A FOLDER WHEN IT'S DONE!

    ---

    "Needing admin privileges every time a program updates is a poor design" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    No, I told you it's ONLY needed for hosts updating not to run it - & you haven't designed anything telling me what is what? LOL - WRONG #1.

    ---

    "using 90's technology to try & fight a modern war" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    Ozymandias from the Watchmen:

    "Alexander the great - I resolved to use antiquities teachings" (hosts) "to our world today & so began my path to conquest: Conquest not of men, but of the evils that beset them: Fossil Fuels (antispyware), Oil (antivirus), Nuclear Power (browser addons) are like a drug & you gentlemen along w/ foreign interests are the pushers..."- WRONG #2.

    It works & our /. peers quoted show it in my next post...

    APK

    P.S.=> To be continued... apk

  99. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #2/2... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Virus scanners/Adblock software don't need admin priv to update" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    AV does to remove threats - WRONG #3. Adblock addons = VASTLY INFERIOR in abilities + efficiency vs. hosts as I've proven w/ noone proved me wrong to date - WRONG #4.

    ---

    "your software does" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    See above - WRONG #5.

    ---

    "won't reveal your source code" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I don't owe you it. I don't give away work to be stolen by others so it's misused like GOOGLE CHROME http://it.slashdot.org/story/1... - WRONG #6.

    ---

    "What's stopping you from pointing my bank's web site at your private server?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    I don't keep a server. You're a security guru (not - you create no ware for security & your forensics skills = non-existent): Put it in a VM, trace it using process monitor + wireshark to prove it (don't need code) & I only put in hardcodes of fav sites @ top of hosts for speed & reliabilty - you'd spot it easily & bulk of the file is sorted blocked known bad threat origins - WRONG #7.

    ---

    "the possibility of being caught, which would be pretty hard to catch w/ such a large hosts file, as no one can go through it manually." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    See just above - WRONG #8.

    ---

    "What are you going to do when Windows gets rid of the hosts file completely?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    Hasn't happened - WRONG #9.

    ---

    "They have already taken steps to make it useless in Windows 10." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    It still works there - WRONG #10.

    APK

    P.S.=> To be continued... apk

  100. Addendum part #3 Coren22's greatest fails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

    Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ... apk

    ---

    Coren22 - this is just the prototype I'm testing - you gave me MORE fails today & /. keeps ac posts small - more are coming.

    APK

    P.S.=> To be continued in part #4/4... apk

  101. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #4/4... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "nowhere in there did you actually say what you are using that isn't a proxy/VPN" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Thursday November 12, 2015 @02:25PM (#50916751)

    I don't use proxies/VPN (or anonymous relays).

    "APK uses anonymous relays to get around the limits of posting anonymous" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)

    I'm not stupid enough to do what YOU want or do (make me as stupid as an easily tracked for retrolling sheep like you).

    There's 3-4 ways to do what I do & they aren't your mistake accusations.

    What I do, like all I do = FAST + EFFICIENT, NO extra "moving parts" - less IS more = GOOD engineering, using what you have natively vs. "Bolting on 'MoAr'" stupidly & illogically.

    You're MCSE/networker/security guru allegedly with no proof - figure it out, I gave clues - I'm NOT going to tell you!

    All you know is I do it WHEN combatting little scumbags like you that hide behind fake names online trolling me.

    It works, like all I do does with testimonials to that effect no less.

    APK

    P.S.=> To be continued in part #5/5... apk

  102. Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #5/5... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22's "greatest hits" fails #5/5... apk

    "but rather than take my advise on various things, he feels that he is allowed to defame me by saying things he knows are not true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)

    Hypocrite, I show you're projecting in my posts. What "advice" can you, an INFERIOR to me, like yourself give?

    "I have offered him advise on ways to improve what he does to reduce the feeling of icky his software - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)

    I've shown /.'er saying differently - Show us you've done better) - & you're "advising"? Talking out your ass on things you haven't done is what you're doing.

    "posting them so often that maybe, just maybe, someone will think they are true - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)

    Quotes of you are true! You can't keep your word as you're replying to me yet again + projecting what I prove YOU do (AD/DNS lie).

    "I don't have time for the Troll APK, and refuse to respond anymore to a post signed APK" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015 @04:27PM (#50858983)

    No troll. I protect users for free w/ a program that speeds them up, helps reliability, & even anonymity online w/ more abilities & efficiency than ANY other 1 solution doing more w/ less - do you? No.

    "Maybe I should change my signature again just to rile him up some more." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 03, 2015 @10:07AM (#50855451) FROM http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    "Rile" me? Childish sig bs is all you've got!

    "I have repeatedly refuted his assertions - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 04, 2015 @10:06AM (#50863109)

    BS - See my last 4 posts here!

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "I never admitted you were right" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#50904323)

    You PROVE IT FOR ME part #1-#5 of your "Greatest Hits Fails"... apk

  103. Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" #1/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apk doesn't think DNS servers are worth running & believes Microsoft Active Directory can run w/out DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015

    Where'd I say it? Show us (not illogic logic but where I literally said it). I say AD needs internal DNS far back as 2007

    http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    See "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers" there in my security guide.

    Fact: You shoot your mouth off lying about it & me, hmmm?

    (It's your mentally damaged goods assburgers brain acting up trying to put words in my mouth I never said? Yes...)

    ---

    Where did I say I don't use DNS too?

    Clue: I do & detailed it for you AGAIN (via my std. post on DNS vs. hosts) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    ---

    "You must really suck at programming" - by Coren22 on Monday November 23, 2015

    What've you programmed? Other /.'ers disagree:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    "No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173) on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @09:31AM (#50947415)

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in 2/6... apk

  104. Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" #2/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "figured out why privilege escalation's a bad thing?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015

    How else can I programmatically update hosts itself?

    ---

    "it requires elevation to write hosts" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015

    Hypocrite later admits it!

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware DEMANDS it or it can't do a job fully like many security tools!

    ---

    "Needing admin privileges every time a program updates is poor design" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Mine doesn't to get new data to update hosts vs. threats. Only hosts itself updates need it vs. WFP/SFP. Users set it too. It's not programmatic impersonation.

    ---

    "90's tech to fight modern war" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Ozymandias/Watchmen per a namesake:

    "I resolved to apply antiquities teachings" (hosts) "to our world today & began my path to conquest - Conquest not of men but of the evils that beset them: Fossil Fuels (antispyware), Oil (antivir), Nuclear Power (addons) are like a drug & you gentlemen along w/ foreign interests are the pushers"

    It works Aryeh Goretsky NOD32/ESET hosts = good security-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...

    Oliver Day (Symantec) too-> http://www.securityfocus.com/c...

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts' Admin hosts + RECOMMENDS my APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit-> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #3/6... apk

  105. Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" #3/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    62 reputable sources + /. users say different:

    Safe by 57 antivirus programs in 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    Per VirScan (installer too)-> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    (& he certified my source http://slashdot.org/comments.p... - he wouldn't host it, much less recommend it, minus that...) /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    "No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173) on Tuesday November 17, 2015 @09:31AM (#50947415)

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't in part #4/6... apk

  106. Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" #4/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "His newest post is trying to refute that MiTM attack opportunity his software provides" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

    I DISPROVED it: Hardcoded favs users provide themselves are REVERSE DNS verified & my program filters 5,500++ false positives:

    1.) Search engines
    2.) Antivirus (e.g. updaters)
    3.) Security community sites
    4.) Captchas, brower home pages + download pages
    5.) Ebay/Amazon (shopper & banking)

    (Security community I get hosts data from do false positives filters in current data + removal lists).

    ---

    "won't demonstrate security of his product be exposing the source (someone might steal it!)" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

    I don't give away work to be stolen OR misused like GOOGLE CHROME http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...

    "the secretary at MalwareBytes took a look at his source code and said it looked all good to them" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday November 18, 2015

    My ware went thru code verification by Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes' hpHosts

    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    A competent coder & BEST security researcher I know of FROM THE BEST ANTIMALWARE THERE IS http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    NOT a secretary!

    ---

    YOU BLEW IT ON ADMIN PRIV TOO: My program doesn't require it hosts does (WFP/SFP): my program protects hosts beyond it!

    I.E.-> I run manually minus admin priv & drag result to hosts naming it "hosts" overwriting original.

    Only auto update needs it (WFP/SFP) & users set it themselves in program shortcut: Not programmatic impersonation.

    ---

    DNS introduces a SECURITY ISSUE RIDDLED SINGLE POINT OF FAILURE & doesn't secure down to endpoints on a LAN -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    How I use remote filtering DNS combined w/ hosts is there showing many DNS security issues hosts overcome.

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't in part #5/6... apk

  107. Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" #5/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Virus scanners/Adblock software don't need admin priv to update" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Neither does my program. AV does to remove threats - Adblock addons = Vastly INFERIOR in abilities + efficiency vs. hosts as I proved & no one proved me wrong to date!

    ---

    "your software does" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    No hosts do (WFP/SFP) - Intake update of new hosts data doesn't!

    ---

    "won't reveal your source code" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    I don't owe you it. I don't give away work to be stolen OR misused like GOOGLE CHROME http://it.slashdot.org/story/1...

    ---

    "What's stopping you from pointing my bank's web site at your private server?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    I don't keep a server. Security guru (not - you create no ware for security & your forensics skills = non-existent): Put it in a VM, trace it via process monitor + wireshark (don't need code)!

    ---

    "the possibility of being caught, which would be pretty hard to catch w/ such a large hosts file, as no one can go through it manually." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    I put hardcoded fav sites @ top of hosts for speed & reliabilty - spotted easily & bulk of hosts = sorted blocked known bad threats provided by the security community (filtered vs. 5,500++ false positive possibles in my program & by current security community data).

    ---

    "What are you going to do when Windows gets rid of the hosts file completely?" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    Hasn't happened!

    ---

    "They have already taken steps to make it useless in Windows 10." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 10, 2015

    It works there!

    Telemetry's killed 10 by itself: VISTA = Win10 = Win8 = flops - who're you fooling other than yourself?

    APK

    P.S.=> Con't. in #6/6... apk

  108. Coren22 = "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" #6/6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 'eats his words' vs. me 2x yet again:

    "introduces risk you are relying on a 3rd party to update a hosts file potentially opening you up to MITM attacks" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    How? My prog puts entries in as non-blocking to hostnames on ones users give it as favs to speed up @ TOP of hosts REVERSE DNS VERIFIED!

    (For more speed, & reliability + security - in RAM as 1st resolver queried = faster & more secure vs. remote DNS w/ all its security issues in Kaminsky flaw, DNSChanger malware IP stack settings, routers bushwhacked in DNS settings, rogue DNS, Open DNS servers abused by malware. It aids in reliability vs. redirects).

    YOU'D SPOT IT INSTANTLY @ TOP OF CUSTOM HOSTS & can easily edit anything you want out!

    (Rest = known bad sites from 10 reputable security community sites for blocking - the MAJORITY of what's in my hosts files!)

    + my sources do removal lists vs. false positives & helped me create a "FP" filter in my program (5,500++ of them)!

    ---

    "maybe one day you can get a score 5 comment" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    See subject & ~ 12 +5 upmods: "Eat your words" (1st one: You tried using what I post there against me to FAIL):

    +5 'modded up' posts by "yours truly" (11):

    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://science.slashdot.org/co...
    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...
    http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
    http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

    "You believe you are getting the better of me" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday November 17, 2015

    YOU GOT THE BEST OF YOURSELF in fails & lies about me. Your immature signatures about me SCREAM you're butthurt - Did it to yourself.

    APK

    P.S.=> You fail Coren22... apk