Slashdot Mirror


Seattle's Behemoth Boring Machine, Idle Since 2013, Makes Some Progress

After being blocked by an obstruction ("the object") which left it idle just over two years ago, repair work has continued on Bertha, Seattle's enormous tunnel-boring machine. Now, reports KOMO News and The Seattle Times, Bertha is once again ready to work. From The Times' coverage: Tuesday morning's push of one and a half feet provided Seattle Tunnel Partners (STP) enough space behind Bertha’s drive motors to fasten the next concrete ring at the 1,085-foot mark of the planned 9,270-foot tube. Chris Dixon, STP project manager, is calling this a testing phase. The team is measuring how Bertha responds while rotating through heavy loads of compacted sand. Last week, a fixed steel arm in the front end broke and needed a one-day repair. ... This week’s two-day push would leave the nose of the drill just short of the north edge of the concrete vault, dug in 2014 so STP could reach and lift the 4million-pound front end for repairs. The winning bid from STP called for the tunnel to be completed this month.

111 comments

  1. Yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Boring.

    1. Re:Yawn.... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Boring.

      You're just digging yourself into a a hole with those puns,

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Yawn.... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      He'll probably get the shaft for it.

      Heh, I had *two* Rum and Cokes last night. I was pretty plowed, actually. They were mostly rum with a splash of Coke. LOL I'll email you in a bit. I never did finish it yesterday.

      Ah well. I suck.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Yawn.... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      No, this is in Seattle, WA - not Boring, OR.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Yawn.... by valles · · Score: 1

      You're having tunnel vision, if you burrow a bit beyond the surface of this subject, you might unearth the truth.

    5. Re:Yawn.... by KGIII · · Score: 0

      That was just dirty. By the way, 2/3rds of "pun" is "P-U." (best said aloud)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew this pun war would excavate quickly.

  2. Behemoth boring machine... by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I guess if it hasn't done anything since 2013 it is certainly a machine capable of boring even a behemoth!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      I, for one, am excited to see the event didn't stop them.

      Maybe the technology will eventually become useful: building underground cities when the ozone is gone, or even tunneling for off planet settlements.

      But shite, even if nothing much comes of it, it is still spending the money on science and technology in stead of war and repression.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by lucm · · Score: 1

      They could have moved faster using a bunch of guys with picks and shovels.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science has become War and Repression.

      Most modern technological advances come from "War".
      Wasting citizens' hard earned money (a.k.a., "Taxes") is "Repression".

      So Shite on you!

    4. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by sdinfoserv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a country who's infrastructure is crumbling; roads, bridges, fresh/waste water systems, electrical grid - failure to fix public works projects IS a threat to our security

    5. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blow it out your ass. The US isn't losing the war against ISIS because Seattle decided to make a tunnel.

    6. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean spending money on imaginary wars and military adventurism right.

    7. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      spending mountains of my money on worthless municipal make-work projects rather than defending our country

      Maybe we should be spending more on mental health.

    8. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They could have moved faster using a bunch of guys with picks and shovels.

      Uhh, you really think a bunch of guys with no machinery beyond picks and shovels could dig out 60' x 60' x 1.5' of solid rock, hardened earth, mud, and sand, all while laying behind them the steal support rings and wire mesh and concrete walls to support the tunnel, AND relocate all that dug up material away from the dig site?

      To be comparable however that bunch of guys with only picks and shovels would need to complete the entire 2000' tunnel on time in a six year window.
      (Delays due to politicians halting and restarting the project not withstanding)

      I'd love to have a glass of whatever was mixed in your eggnog this year :P

    9. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      >worthless municipal make-work projects

      If any city needed a tunnel, Seattle is it. It is far from worthless.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    10. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 0

      Don't fret. We can have it all. Doomsaying over global threats as well as over our crumbling infrastructure. And global warming ta boot! Not sure I should head to work with all the dangers lurking.

    11. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I figure they probably work at Boeing and are mad that the money isn't going to them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    12. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly, why isn't our crumbling infrastructure our number one priority?? In my state this year we've had 5 bridge collapses, ecoli in our water, and only 4 hours of electricity per day! It's like living in a third world country!!!!

    13. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a country who's infrastructure is crumbling; roads, bridges, fresh/waste water systems, electrical grid - failure to fix public works projects IS a threat to our security

      digging big holes in the ground for no particular reason (there is NO reason for Seattle to have this tunnel. NONE) is an even worse threat

    14. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should be spending more on mental health.

      Lets start with yours then.

    15. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >worthless municipal make-work projects

      If any city needed a tunnel, Seattle is it. It is far from worthless.

      That tunnel will make a nice salt-water reservoir after the Cascadia subduction zone mega-quake and subsequent tsunami hits.

    16. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL;DR. The media only sees this bit:
      "IS a threat to our security"

    17. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhh, you really think a bunch of guys with no machinery beyond picks and shovels could dig out 60' x 60' x 1.5' of solid rock, hardened earth, mud, and sand, all while laying behind them the steal support rings and wire mesh and concrete walls to support the tunnel, AND relocate all that dug up material away from the dig site?

      Please understand I'm not meaning to advocate for the "picks and shovels" side of the argument. But FYI - Seattle already has a 110-year-old train tunnel (the "Great Northern Tunnel"), dug with picks and shovels and dynamite, that runs through pretty much the exact same area and types of soils. This new tunnel is actually going to pass under the Great Northern tunnel!

      I find it funny because a lot of people who simply don't want to spend money are using the argument that the complex soils in the area make tunneling impractical. They obviously don't know about the existing tunnel either.

      In reality, the fundamental problem here is the people making decisions tried to save a little money by digging one giant pipe rather than going with the more typical two-bore twin tunnels. When you push boundaries there are always additional risks.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    18. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In a country who's infrastructure is crumbling; roads, bridges, fresh/waste water systems, electrical grid - failure to fix public works projects IS a threat to our security

      The scaremongering about our "crumbling infrastructure" comes mostly from ASCE, construction companies, and politicians trying to get pork for their district. These are all special interest groups with their snout in the trough. There is little evidence that our infrastructure is actually getting worse. On a per capita basis, infrastructure failures such as bridge collapses, are less common than they were a generation ago.

    19. Re: Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lol defending our country? Right. Because the jsf, drones, security theater, etc etc etc actually make the world safer. Freedom for all of humanity? Yep. We're so on that. Talk about conceit. We don't even know the names of countries that repress their people until they suicide bomb us because we accidentally blow up a school. I'm thinking I'll help you pack. Take your world police with you so the rest of us can perform the science that makes the world a better place instead of pretending forcing it to be better actually works.

    20. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      making sure the world is a free place for all of humanity sounds like a great idea.

      Who the hell asked us to make them "free"? Maybe they damn well don't want what we call "freedom". Perhaps the greatest "freedom" they want is to be free of our attempts to make them "free".

      Have you ever heard of the concept of minding your own damn business? Not only does the world not need us, it doesn't want us.

      I'm with you on actually defending the country. But let the rest of the world defend themselves. Not our problem.

    21. Re: Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data reference please.

    22. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      Sure seems like one of those emotional things, why fund wars when we need roads and education?! On the way to work I pass under half a dozen bridges being redone. We have our own 371 million dollar tunnel for water being made. Infrastructure is always going to lag

    23. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      digging big holes in the ground for no particular reason (there is NO reason for Seattle to have this tunnel. NONE) is an even worse threat

      No reason except that Seattle is a hilly, densely populated city perched between two large bodies of water. I mean, its 2015 so the terrain poses absolutely no challenge at all to your flying car, right?

    24. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by CaptQuark · · Score: 2

      Comparing the two tunnels is a bit unfair because the new construction is like digging 14 of the old tunnels.

      The new tunnel is circle 60' in diameter, compared to the 30' semicircular train tunnel (8 times bigger), and the new tunnel is 1.75 miles long compared to one mile(.75x8=+6). Plus, the floor of the old tunnel was flat and only required laying train tracks. The new tunnel is circular and will require a double roadway and utility spaces.

      If the new tunnel was dug with picks, shovels, and dynamite, it would take 14 times the 1.5 years of the old tunnel or 21 years total. Then start the construction of the interior infrastructure.

      No, this isn't a project that would be feasible with picks and shovels.

      --

    25. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you stupid fuck.
      the average age of a bridge in this country is 50 years old.
      most were designed for 30 year lifespans.

      you claiming they're doing it to line their pockets is no different than claiming scientists do AGW just for the money.
      its bullshit.

      when your subject matter experts tell you there's a fucking problem, IT MEANS THERE IS A FUCKING PROBLEM.

    26. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      densely populated city

      bullshit, compared to east coast cities seattle is the wild wilderness. Acres and acres of undeveloped, forested land.

    27. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >worthless municipal make-work projects

      If any city needed a tunnel, Seattle is it. It is far from worthless.

      That tunnel will make a nice salt-water reservoir after the Cascadia subduction zone mega-quake and subsequent tsunami hits.

      I'm rather hoping I'm on a business trip somewhere when that happens. At least that's the extent of my Earthquake preparation.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    28. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, collapsing bridges in Washington State and Minnesota, hackers gaining access to power grid, are testimonials to your accuracy.

    29. Re:Behemoth boring machine... by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      Don't get upset, he's drank the FauxNoise coolaid. The best we can hope for is education - calm, reasoned, critical thinking, fact based education. .... till they pull the religion card.... then beat them.

  3. disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the headline, I thought this was going to be an article about Microsoft.

  4. Another.... by saturndude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Another boring story on slashdot.

    1. Re:Another.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hot story from 2013!

  5. How did it overheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I understand that when it hit the metal casing, it overheated. Couple of questions I've got that after looking, didn't find the answer:

    I thought this was capable of boring through rock, how come it couldn't go through a metal pipe? Ok, it can't go through the pipe, how could this thing not have tons of sensors capable of detecting the overheating issue?

    1. Re:How did it overheat by lucm · · Score: 1

      They disagree on this. The tunnel people claim it's the pipe, the state people (who put the pipe there) say it's not the pipe. I don't think we'll ever know.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:How did it overheat by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rock crumbles, is brittle, and has a low tensile strength even though the compressive strength is high. The sort of steel used for a pipe is none of those things.
      See also stuff designed for "soft rock" suddenly hitting Basalt.

    3. Re:How did it overheat by plover · · Score: 4, Informative

      Rock is more brittle than steel. Hit rock with a hard enough cutter blade, pushing with enough force, and you will chip away at it. Hit a malleable and tough steel pipe with the same cutter blade and the same amount of force, and the blade may dig in to the steel and get caught in it.

      The operator doesn't exactly have visibility into the obstruction, so when progress stops, he may not recognize what's going wrong. He can add more force in an attempt to break through. Add enough force and something will eventually give, but there's no guarantee if it will be the obstruction that gives way, or the engine, or the power train, or the frame of his machine.

      And what kinds of sensors do you think you can deploy on the face of a giant cutting disk that will survive the thousands of horsepower of force mashing it into the earth? (Trick question, the answer is none.) About all they can effectively monitor is from the back side of the cutting face. That means indirect measurements only, like the amount of power, rotational speed, rate of travel, temperature of the cutting face, sound of the cutting face, and the composition of the tailings. It's not exactly like looking out the windshield and seeing you're about to drive into a big steel pipe. The amount of power is regulated by the operator, but what are his options when it stops going forward? It's not like he can back up and turn left to go around it. He can pretty much decide "add power" or "stay stuck".

      --
      John
    4. Re:How did it overheat by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And what kinds of sensors do you think you can deploy on the face of a giant cutting disk that will survive the thousands of horsepower of force mashing it into the earth? (Trick question, the answer is none.)

      Actually, I would have imagined that they'd come up with a way to measure conductivity and capacitance while in operation, and also that they would periodically stop and use some kind of ultrasound equipment to determine the composition of the material ahead. The latter is arguably the more plausible. Is that being done? If not, why not? If so, why didn't it find a big metal pipe?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:How did it overheat by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Having done a whole lot of work, across this country and in others, specifically with with government workers - I can answer your questions with one word:

      Municipality.

      But, some more of the story... No, I'm not saying all government is bad. I am saying that, for whatever reason, highway/transportation departments do some amazing things but sometimes they're amazingly inept.

      Here's a Wikipedia article about the project:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Here's a section on the WSDOT site about the history (and has more information):
      http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projec...

      They mention a muni engineer but I'm unable to find any information about the traffic engineers or the traffic modelers. I can almost guarantee that they exist, especially with the FHWA involved, and the timing on the project is interesting. I'd have had zero personal involvement but I may be familiar with the company who provided the above mentioned services. Very, very few municipalities (even at the State level) have the staff, education, or compute power to actually model their own traffic (in a timely fashion) and then make accurate predictions and suggestions. Thus, I'm almost willing to wager that it was contracted out and there were few companies doing so at the time (though there were more coming online starting a few years prior).

      If anyone's in the area and wants to find out who did the work then I just might be able to get some sort of preview about real expectations (those expectations not given in the city council meetings or in press releases) and find out any scuttlebutt - though it might be a bit dated, I suspect the modeling company and/or traffic engineers have someone either on-call or on-site and they'll be capable of recommending, designing, and remodeling - or at least collecting the data and pushing it back to be done on big iron. I can say that I'd be a combination of pissed off for tying up the personnel and happy for the money because they've been paying some guy to hang out in WA for two years while the project went nowhere - and he's got no input, expertise, or willingness to accept liability for making any decisions as to what to do with broken equipment.

      (They probably did work with others to look at alternative routes but I'm not seeing much about that.) Usually, it is me me picking people's brains on Slashdot. For once, I might actually know something or be able to find it out. It's really a bad idea to do a project this size completely in-house. They're just not really equipped for it and, more often than not, you end up with a combination of seemingly good ideas that really don't work that well but someone read an article and maybe a book. There's everything from seismic activity to psychology that goes into modeling traffic effectively and (in my not-so-humble opinion) very few providers of that service that are actually qualified.

      Ah well... I don't have any insight at all on this project but if someone can find out who did the modeling then I might be able to connect with a people or two. When you let a muni do the work, you end up with stuff like bicycle racks in an island at the end of a closed highway's on ramp. You end up with things like half the parking spots being taken away - to encourage walking, but no new spots added on the outskirts. You end up with short merge points and a need to go from city-street speeds to highway speeds in a few hundred feet. It's not really their fault, they simply don't have the capacity to look at the larger picture and the experience to optimize the throughput. It's also pretty expensive.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:How did it overheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asked the original question and thanks to the two people who mentioned the brittleness of rock. Yep, understand how the steel would be malleable and rock brittle would affect things. Thanks.

      I used to work for a company that made material testing equipment. They made stuff that went from working on pieces of rubber to jet engines to making rigs that destructively test the wings on airliners. You wouldn't believe how many sensors are attached to an airplane and other sophisticated machines (and they're built in from the get go). There are also a surprising number and types of sensors out there and they get put into some pretty nasty environments. That's why I wasn't sure why this didn't have sensors. Not that I thought the original engineers weren't smart enough to think of it, I didn't understand enough of the machine.

    7. Re:How did it overheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If anyone's in the area and wants to find out who did the work then I just might be able to get some sort of preview about real expectations (those expectations not given in the city council meetings or in press releases) and find out any scuttlebutt - though it might be a bit dated, I suspect the modeling company and/or traffic engineers have someone either on-call or on-site and they'll be capable of recommending, designing, and remodeling - or at least collecting the data and pushing it back to be done on big iron.

      http://www.tunneltalk.com/Alaskan-Way-May10-RFP-released.php

      With determination to maintain momentum, State officials met deadline this week and issued a request for proposals to build a bored tunnel replacement of the Alaskan Way Viaduct in Seattle. Three international pre-qualified teams now have until October to return proposals ahead of a planned award of contract in January.TBM tunnelling of the 54ft (15-16m) diameter bore could start in 2013 towards a targeted official opening on December 31st, 2015.
        p1 Route of the double-deck highway viaduct that is to come down
      Released on Wednesday (May 26th), the documents describe the scope of the estimated $1 billion and $1.2 billion project and set technical requirements to be met by the design-build contractors. Much of the strategic and detailed design elements however are left open to the contractors. These include the design, type and manufacture of the TBM; the method and destination of muck disposal; design and manufacture of the segmental lining; and the sequencing of tunnel excavation with construction of the interior road decks. The base design documents prepared by the client's designer Parsons Brinckerhoff and its PMAC (Program Management and Advisory Consultant) Hatch Mott MacDonald includes a geotechnical baseline report (GBR) and specifies pressurised EPB or slurry TBM excavation to cope with ground water pressures up to 5 bar, and control surface settlement above the 9,100ft (2.7km) long large diameter drive some 60ft to 200ft (18-60m) benearth the streets of the city. The RFP also sets out requirements for the highway tunnel's ventilation, fire/life safety, and electrical systems, and construction of its portals.

      The three joint ventures prequalified to bid the contract are:
      Seattle Tunneling Group (STG) comprising S A Healy; FCC Construccion, SA of Spain;
      Parsons Transportation Group; and Halcrow
      AWV Joint Venture (KBB) of Kiewit Pacific; Bilfinger Berger of Germany; and AECOM
      Seattle Tunnel Partners (STP) comprising Dragados-USA of Spanish parent company; HNTB Corporation

      Seattle Tunnel Partners is a joint venture of New York-based Dragados USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Dragados, S.A., the construction division of ACS Group of Spain; and Tutor Perini Corporation, based in Sylmar, Calif.

      They won the boring bid.

    8. Re:How did it overheat by gr8dude · · Score: 1

      Would a sonar do the trick? It can be placed on the surface and send pings that will help measure the density of materials on the machine's path.

    9. Re:How did it overheat by KGIII · · Score: 2

      Thanks - that pointed me in the right direction. They did it, for the most part, in-house. A recently deceased Ralph Iboshi was brought on with the design team. He passed away back in 2012(ish), as I recall. He was with KPFF (they had at least one good employ - namely Mr. Iboshi) but KPFF's name is not on any of the documents that I'm finding. I'm only finding Mr. Iboshi's name.

      It took me a minute to make the connection but you can find him listed on page 24 in this PDF:
      http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projec...

      But, when I look here:
      http://www.scatnow.com/FEIS%20...

      I see him listed as still being with KPFF. It makes me wonder if he simply ended up staying on with the muni and left KPFF or what. Given the date of the RFP, 2006, I'm a little concerned that I know nothing of the project. (The companies that you listed are the guys that are doing the construction - there's surely someone, perhaps from KPFF, still on-site though they have an office in Tacoma as I recall.)

      At any rate, I noticed a fairly typical thing... Someone (probably Iboshi) came up with a bunch of great ideas and the State of Washington cut it down and they're implementing only five or six. (I'm willing to bet the additional costs would have been a percentage point or two.) This is why you can't have nice things. I've ranted about it on Slashdot before.

      I'll keep reading and looking up more information. I'm just getting back in a little while ago. I'll make a phone call tomorrow or later tonight and see what pops out. If I saw the project, I don't believe we put a bid in on it. I don't even recognize it which is, well, a bit odd given the time frame. I'll dig back through and see if they did a regional RFP only and/or only sought an in-state business. Sometime around that point (around the time of the quake) was when KPFF opened an office up in Washington. They're usually out of Oregon - I think... Yeah, Oregon, I'll Google if need be.

      At any rate, Iboshi's got some quality work out there. Years ago, he did some work on the PCH. One of the primary things that PCH tries to maintain is aesthetics (there's an interesting history going back through - the design work on the bridges is amazing) and there was a need to optimize throughput with growing traffic demands in the mid 1990s. I'd trust his work - but I'd keep in mind that they only acted on some of the proposals and it looks like quite a bit of work was done in-house.

      The price doesn't look too bad. I suspect the insurance company is going to be pissed with the delay but that's what insurance is for. If you live out that way, you should call it some part of it, just a small part, Iboshi Way. Unless it turns out to suck, in that case - I mention again that municipalities are horrific about only implementing a part of the proposed solution - often at trivial cost savings and will only lead to much more expensive expansions or alterations in the future.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:How did it overheat by plover · · Score: 1

      A couple of people have mentioned sonar. It might be possible to peek into the upcoming rock, but the machine would have to be silenced to execute the tests. That might be more downtime than they want, given the normal course of boring. Maybe the operators could have pinged the rock when they first encountered the obstruction, but maybe it was already too late by that time.

      Oh, and one other method of control they have is depth of cut. I believe they can adjust each cutting head assembly as to how deep they want it to cut. I presume they can adjust it for different kinds of material, or change out the cutting bits as needed.

      I don't know how they'd be set up for boring earth, as I've only ever bored steel with a straight fixed cutter, and the depth of cut in steel is on the order of a few thousandths of an inch per revolution. The dimensions don't relate at all to a tunnel borer.

      --
      John
    11. Re:How did it overheat by plover · · Score: 1

      To take sonic readings, they'd have to shut the machine off first to eliminate the noise it would generate; even then, road noise from the surface might be too disruptive. Or maybe it was all muck, with no good way to ping it.

      They certainly should have been aware of the location of the pipe, as it was purportedly documented in the spec. Maybe there was an error in the doc, or maybe the engineers failed to notify the bore operator, or maybe the operators just weren't paying attention.

      They might be able to measure the slurry, but that wouldn't tell them anything about upcoming surprises. I'm not sure what kind of electrodes you could use for checking conductivity of the cut face (that would survive a constant rock grinding), or if anyone felt it would be worth the expense.

      --
      John
  6. Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Another boring story on slashdot.

    You know the drill..

    1. Re:Yep by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another boring story on slashdot.

      You know the drill..

      This does not augur well for the New Year.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another boring story on slashdot.

      You know the drill..

      This does not augur well for the New Year.

      There is a hole in your arguments.

  7. Didn't they hit a pipe specified in the contract? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember that they hit a pipe and keep drilling, even though the pipe had been identified and listed in the contract?

  8. Re:Seattle taxpayers by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Yeah but they have baristas dressed in bikinis in drive-thru coffee stands!

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  9. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bikinis at $15/hour

  10. Re:Seattle taxpayers by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Seattle's taxpayers have to be the most stupid motherfuckers on Earth.

    Seattle consistently ranks in the top three US cities on a whole host of criteria, and has the second-highest percentage of the population with graduate degrees (after San Francisco), so probably not exactly the stupidest motherfuckers on Earth.

    Have you ever been to San Antonio, Orlando, Louisville or Tampa?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was stupid when we approved it even if boring through Seattle's seafront wasn't a terrible idea. Now I wish everyone that voted yes had to pay for overruns personally.

  12. Boring article by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    Get it? LOL hahahahaha

  13. Re:Didn't they hit a pipe specified in the contrac by PPH · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes. But the path of the tunnel runs through what is essentially an old land fill. So the machine should have been designed to deal with old steam boilers, scrap iron, chunks of concrete/rebar, etc.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  14. Pretty smooth so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let's see if they can fail as badly as this project. There's still plenty of opportunity.

  15. Re:Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seattle's taxpayers have to be the most stupid motherfuckers on Earth.

    No, but they are the most stupid of taxpayers in the Pacific Northwest.

  16. Not again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    As a Seattleite, Bertha has been a huge, expensive disappointment so far, but we all hope in our hearts that eventually this *&$%@ thing will get the job done.

    And maybe, just maybe they'll come away with some lessons learned form this kabillion dollar, 0.5mph joyride.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Not again by Strider- · · Score: 1

      And maybe, just maybe they'll come away with some lessons learned form this kabillion dollar, 0.5mph joyride.

      Don't you mean 0.5mpy joyride?

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    2. Re:Not again by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And maybe, just maybe they'll come away with some lessons learned form this kabillion dollar, 0.5mph joyride.

      Maybe one of those lessons is "there are risks when you try to save money by pushing the boundaries with new, untested drilling technology".

      Meanwhile the tunnels Sound Transit has been recently digging in Seattle, following ho-hum old smaller bore twin-tunnel principles, are going well - they're under budget and ahead of schedule. I am really looking forward to taking light rail to UW in a month or two! No more sitting on a bus that's stuck in traffic gridlock...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Not again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile the tunnels Sound Transit has been recently digging in Seattle, following ho-hum old smaller bore twin-tunnel principles, are going well - they're under budget and ahead of schedule

      Those bastards. What can we do about this? Can we involve them in some awesome new-technology pilot project that costs billions, or are we doomed to have a successful outcome?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Not again by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      And maybe, just maybe they'll come away with some lessons learned form this kabillion dollar, 0.5mph joyride.

      Don't you mean 0.5mpy joyride?

      Uhh, yeah. That's probably more like it. Thank god that thing costs a fortune or I'd really feel cheated.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  17. Re:Seattle taxpayers by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Seattle's taxpayers have to be the most stupid motherfuckers on Earth.

    Yeah, like we have a fucking choice? The Seattle city council and the jackoffs in Olympia spend our money however they feel like it with ZERO responsibility to the citizens and taxpayers here. Pretty much like most cities, frankly. They do what they want, when they want, and ignore anything we tell them.

    Witness the fucking toll lanes on 405- NO ONE wanted these fucking things, they government went back on their promise to add a 3rd lane to make up for the two lanes they took away, and now traffic is a nightmare every day. They take away two entire lanes from a major freeway, and whaddya know, now traffic in the remaining lanes is a nightmare all day long. Gee, who could have seen that coming? This is artificial scarcity at it's best.

    Sometimes the tolls to use those lanes (only about 8 miles long) are almost $10 one way. Trust me, no one in the voting public voted for this shit. Now there's an initiative to scrap the tolling, but do you think that DOT or the government will listen? Of course not, they don't give a shit because either they never have to use those lanes or they can afford to pay the money to drive in the Princess Lanes.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  18. Re:Seattle taxpayers by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Yeah but they have baristas dressed in bikinis in drive-thru coffee stands!

    Yes, yes we do. :)

    Although we call them "Horizontal Hospitality Workers".

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  19. Did they find the "Object"? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    What was blocking the tunnel machine? It was the shallowest part of the tunnel. It could be an iron ship sunk 100 or 150 years ago.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Did they find the "Object"? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What was blocking the tunnel machine? It was the shallowest part of the tunnel. It could be an iron ship sunk 100 or 150 years ago.

      RTFL[ink], it is right there in the summary. The digger was stopped by a metal pipe.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Did they find the "Object"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was blocking the tunnel machine? It was the shallowest part of the tunnel. It could be an iron ship sunk 100 or 150 years ago.

      RTFL[ink], it is right there in the summary. The digger was stopped by a metal pipe.

      Whoa, dude! I was wondering where I left my pipe!! We were totally trashed that night, man, could barely find the car. My bad, seriously.
      So can I get the pipe back?

    3. Re:Did they find the "Object"? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I hope it is not one of those Martian colony ships. Or since this is Seattle, maybe I hope it is.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

  20. Re:Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just Google for "Seattle Director's Rules" that were created to prevent us from getting cable TV or good phone service. They're now preventing faster than 1.5 Mbps DSL from being provided in Seattle. That's why so many people here still use dial-up or ISDN.

  21. Re:Seattle taxpayers by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seattle's taxpayers have to be the most stupid motherfuckers on Earth.

    Seattle consistently ranks in the top three US cities on a whole host of criteria, and has the second-highest percentage of the population with graduate degrees (after San Francisco), so probably not exactly the stupidest motherfuckers on Earth.

    Have you ever been to San Antonio, Orlando, Louisville or Tampa?

    But the traffic sucks. They should build a tunnel or something.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  22. Just another example. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

    of private industry doing it better than government. Sitting around for two years doing nothing and still getting paid. What a job.

    Sounds a lot like insurance companies. Force people to pay up but never do the thing you've been paid to do. The greatest scam on Earth, next to religion.

    Don't worry Seattle taxpayers, this private company will use as much of your tax dollars as it takes to get the job done.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  23. Meh by lucm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    On paper you may be correct. But in real life, the "machine" did 1 mile in nearly 3 years. The theory doesn't survive reality. You can't build a real tunnel with "it should work"s.

    Compare this to the Panama Canal: 48 miles in 10 years, with the most advanced tech being steam-powered excavating machines. Not underground, but there was a mountain to go through, water to deal with, and all the jungle stuff (diseases, insects, animals).

    This Seattle thing is the worst case ever of machine worshipping and engineering mental masturbation.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re: Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, when building the Panama canal they had an endless supply of expendable bodies. When worker safety is actually a thing, large projects actually require care and planning.

  24. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know. I live in Seattle and there are quite a lot of stupid people.

  25. Re:Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seattle's taxpayers have to be the most stupid motherfuckers on Earth.

    Yeah, like we have a fucking choice?

    Actually you did. Every single one of them was voted in by you dumb fucks.

  26. Re:Seattle taxpayers by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Heh... Everett. They've got a Naval base there. I have been there but I don't recall any Bikini workers. This was the late 1970s. They only had whores.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  27. Re:Seattle taxpayers by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Pfft... Pope, I hold a Ph.D... I'll let that sink in for a minute.

    Good? Alright. No, having a Ph.D is not indicative of intelligence by default. I know some highly educated idiots and, sometimes, put myself into that category.

    However, I concede your point about San Antonio, Orlando, Louisville, and Tampa. I will, on the other hand, offer this:
    http://www.online-phd-programs...

    And, because someone has to, I'll add that Seattle is probably home of the most hipsters and SJWs! (Someone had to throw that out there.)

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  28. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And even that 1.5 Mbps DSL is hard to get in a lot of the city due to the age of the phone wiring.

  29. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This city us so anti-corporation that we cut off our own noses to spite our faces.

  30. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've lived in Seattle all of my life, but haven't yet lived somewhere I could get cable. I hate the director's rules.

  31. Gee by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to using good old dynamite to clear the obstruction?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  32. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the Director's Rules make it nearly impossible to replace the wiring.

  33. Re:Seattle taxpayers by mschuyler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seattle taxpayers are not paying for this project, except insofar as they are taxpayers to the State and the Feds, which are. "Local" funding is a small percentage of the $3 billion project. Further:

    1. I-5 is a parking lot. Traffic congestion in Seattle is 5th worse in the nation.
    2. The current Alaskan Way Viaduct is an ugly concrete behemoth.
    3. The current Alaskan Way Viaduct is going to fall down.
    4. The current Alaskan Way Viaduct carries 110,000 vehicles a day.
    5. We can all ride bicycles because the city has closed one entire lane of most downtown streets to accommodate it.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  34. Re: Seattle taxpayers by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    I don't know. I live in Seattle and there are quite a lot of stupid people.

    There were fewer before you got there.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  35. Re:Seattle taxpayers by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

    Artificial scarcity is what it is all about these days.
    Even in Canada, where I am.

    This is all done to encourage transit or high density development. Not that those aren't worthy goals, but I'd prefer they actually tried doing things in a positive manner but you know... proper planning, building good transit... instead of making life so miserable, people are forced to change their ways.

    They're also doing tolling here, and mandating density... all the while... not much new transit. Oh they keep saying it's coming.

    Ah well... misery loves company!

  36. Re:Seattle taxpayers by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Artificial scarcity is what it is all about these days.

    Yep, dry up or kill off a resource, then charge to provide it back to the victims you took it from. That'll be the new hot business model for the next couple of decades, until the people that think this shit up are stuffed into 55-gallon drums and dropped overboard on a dark moonless night.

    Oh wait, did I say that last part out loud?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  37. Re:Didn't they hit a pipe specified in the contrac by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Yes. But the path of the tunnel runs through what is essentially an old land fill. So the machine should have been designed to deal with old steam boilers, scrap iron, chunks of concrete/rebar, etc.

    It should have been designed so it could have been repaired in place if it broke. Currently waiting for it to break down again under some skyscraper in downtown.

  38. Re:Seattle taxpayers by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Heh... Everett. They've got a Naval base there. I have been there but I don't recall any Bikini workers. This was the late 1970s. They only had whores.

    Oh, there are lots of Bikini Baristas around, you hardly have to even look for them. Probably 50% of the little independent places feature cute gals wearing nothing but undies or bikinis or whatever.

    I mean, that's what I hear, I certainly wouldn't know from *cough* personal experience.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  39. Re:Seattle taxpayers by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    If there is any doubt about this, consider the fact that they voted to tax themselves to pay $300 million for a new football stadium for a team owned by one of the richest men in the world with a net worth of $20 billion and owner of a $200 million yacht.

  40. Re:Seattle taxpayers by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I don't think there are any around here until Spring Break comes around and then there are just hoards of chicks with little clothing on and they tend to spill over onto my private section. I don't mind or anything but I have a little lady with me this time. I think it might be prudent to go back north before the middle of February hits. My kids have spent more time here than I have but I've come down to enjoy the view during Spring Break. I'm watching the sunset, of course. Yeah, that's the view that I speak of.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  41. Re:Seattle taxpayers by PPH · · Score: 1

    Have you ever been to San Antonio, Orlando, Louisville or Tampa?

    Stand by. We're not quite sure where Bertha will surface.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  42. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your premise is pretty wacky. PhDs are hardly a good indicator of intelligence, as you yourself mentioned.

  43. Re: Seattle taxpayers by KGIII · · Score: 1

    That is my point.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  44. Re: Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bikinis at $15/hour

    $15 + tips, there isn't a separate minimum wage for tipped employees versus non-tipped employees.

  45. Re:Seattle taxpayers by budgenator · · Score: 1

    I was there visiting around 2008, the TV made it sound like the Bikini Baristas were just starting, I did notice that the others Baristas weren't above showing more cleavage when the tip jar was put.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  46. Lesser Seattle by alanterra · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing the poster is a native-born Seattlite, since s/he uses "The Times" to refer to the The Seattle Times, seemingly unaware the this means The New York Times or The London Times to most of the world. I lived in Seattle a couple of times, and it was clear that most people there thought that Seattle was the center of world. It wasn't and it isn't, but I wish them luck with their tunnel.

  47. Re:Seattle taxpayers by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I was out that way in the 1970s and then, for a short spell, again in the early 1990s. Other than that, I've been that way for a few Microsoft events but those are kind of in the opposite direction so I spent no additional time in Everett. I did have a younger friend who was in the Navy and stationed there. His ship was the USS Stennis and that was her home harbor. I've forgotten which carrier group she was assigned to but it might have been the Ford.

    I have no knowledge beyond that and I don't rightly recall the Bikini girls from my latter visits. I've had the fortune of encountering them at other locations but paying people to remove their clothing is really not that exciting for me. If I am going to pay someone to remove their clothing then, frankly, it seems a bit self-defeating unless I'm paying for services that go beyond that point.

    Not that I'm going to admit to such behavior, or anything, but that if I *were* going to do so then I'd want to purchase more services than people removing their clothing. With society as it is now, and with the prevalence of the internet, I can generally find find people who are willing to provide the clothing removal services (and more) for little or no financial investment.

    Yeah, I should probably post this as an AC. ;-) I won't. I stand by what I said or, more accurately, what I did not say.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  48. Re:Didn't they hit a pipe specified in the contrac by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    No, the tunnel goes BELOW the landfill. The pipe was left from a prior geological survey.

  49. Last week a fixed steel arm in the front end broke by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    This week a broken steel arm in the front end was fixed.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  50. Re:Seattle taxpayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah but they have baristas dressed in bikinis in drive-thru coffee stands!

    Yes, but Portland has the record density of stip clubs. Like every coffee shop has a little stage at the back with somebody bumping and grinding.

  51. Re:Seattle taxpayers by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Seattle's taxpayers have to be the most stupid motherfuckers on Earth.

    Seattle consistently ranks in the top three US cities on a whole host of criteria, and has the second-highest percentage of the population with graduate degrees (after San Francisco), so probably not exactly the stupidest motherfuckers on Earth.

    Have you ever been to San Antonio, Orlando, Louisville or Tampa?

    I've been to all those places.
    San Antonio was a ring of decay surrounding a river themed tourist trap.
    Orlando is Disney. Enough said.
    Louisville. When I asked the concierge for a vegetarian restaurant (I was traveling with an Indian colleague) he suggested the steak house across the road.
    Tampa? Would you like some murder with your excess humidity?

    Seattle isn't Portland. But it's a place I wouldn't mind living.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.