Slashdot Mirror


Sensors Designed For Prosthetic Hands Could Lead To New Textile Standards (smithsonianmag.com)

schwit1 writes: "When you touch something, you are doing more than sensing the surface of that object. You're also changing it, however subtly. Your finger emits heat, and no matter how gentle you are, you exert an almost imperceptible amount of pressure. In other words, you aren't just feeling the material, you're feeling its reaction to your touch."

With this in mind, SynTouch has built its BioTac sensor to emulate this reaction by producing heat and pressure on its own, just like a real finger would. But in order to teach the sensor how to process this information, its engineers have developed the "SynTouch Standard" — a comprehensive collection of 500 different materials classified based on 15 different factors, which includes friction and smoothness, Sarah Fecht writes for Popular Science.

By categorizing these materials to teach the robots differences in texture, SynTouch has almost accidentally created a texture standard for manufacturers. Companies could use these standards to more easily judge fabrics that are used for everything from the newest runway styles to car seat covers.

21 comments

  1. Changing Standards by SMPMike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think saying that this could change industry standards is putting the cart before the horse. What the author is suggesting is that an entire industry should change its standards so that another companies robot can "feel" its fabric correctly? That would be like Apple or Microsoft or Samsung designing phones so that they will fit a specific manufacturers cases. Probably not going to happen.

    1. Re:Changing Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you think the rectangular shape with rounded corners came from?

    2. Re:Changing Standards by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole point of the article is not that they're changing industry standards. The whole point is that they're making a new standard on properties that either have no standard or poor, little used standards at present.

      As it stands, while most industries feel comfortable for example simply specifying a color of a product based on a pantone, they insist on samples or travel to ensure that textures come out right. if you wanted to specify how an object should feel, there was no reliable standard way to do that. You could use descriptive words or analogies, make up your own set of measurement standards that you want it to meet, etc... but there was no easy standard way to describe in absolute, measurable terms how things feel. This team's research basically makes a pantone system for texture. The sensors sense each property to higher resolution than a human can, and thus one can be confident that one surface created to specific syntouch specification will feel exactly the same another, one can interpolate properties between different syntouch specifications ("I want a sheet with a texture halfway between these two"), and so forth, just like one can with pantones.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    3. Re:Changing Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be like Apple or Microsoft or Samsung designing phones so that they will fit a specific manufacturers cases.

      They are already designing their phones around a bunch of other third party components.

      What is suggested here is that this new way of categorizing surfaces is superior and that manufacturers might want to adopt it rather than using a subpar system.

      That we are using the periodic table rather than the four elements to describe materials should be an indication that it is possible to go this way.
      That some refuses to step away from the imperial system is an indication that some might not want to.

    4. Re:Changing Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you think the rectangular shape with rounded corners came from?

      Moses?

    5. Re: Changing Standards by Bartles · · Score: 1

      O R they? That's ridiculous.

  2. But why would they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it in their interest?

    1. Re:But why would they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can licence the technology and they get to sell the hardware to do the measurements.

  3. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funky. Cold. Medina.

  4. texture subtleties by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    By categorizing these materials to teach the robots differences in texture, SynTouch has almost accidentally created a texture standard for manufacturers. Companies could use these standards to more easily judge fabrics that are used for everything from the newest runway styles to car seat covers.

    It seems likely this technology will fall short of a human's refined ability to feel, much the same as present attempts to discern subtle color variations.

    It is, however, a neat step forward for robotics.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:texture subtleties by Rei · · Score: 1

      According to TFI, their sensors outperform human touch. Also, as per your link, a cheap uncooled PCB "RGB sensor" is not exactly state of the art in spectral analysis, to put it mildly. In the extreme case we can count individual photons at each of highly specified, narrow frequencies with virtually no error. The eye is quite good, but it's not that good.

      --
      Shiny New Australia.
    2. Re:texture subtleties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ** TFA

  5. Testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard they had to switch to female testers, because with the male testers the hand somehow got itself stuck to their genitalia.

  6. Similar Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds similar to the research project I was involved in 9 years ago:
    http://haptex.miralab.unige.ch/

  7. Probably sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably going to be copyrighted, patented, and/or locked down so tight nobody will be able to wear cotton anymore. Kinda like pantone.

    1. Re:Probably sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure... since these are the people who designed and make the sensors to read all this data, I think it's in their best interests to do whatever they can to get as many companies as they can to adopt it so that they can sell as many sensor packages as possible.

  8. clever ideas, at what cost? by time961 · · Score: 1

    There are some very cool ideas here, particularly the use of hydraulic coupling to measure pressure and vibration, as well as the measurement of thermal properties. It's a very nice sensor for robot fingers.

    However, it seems to targeted solely toward bulk perception, since the fingertip looks smooth and uniform. This is quite different from human fingertips, where the fingerprint ridges provide a significant component of tactile perception, particularly in motion. It's also not obvious why the thermal measurements should correspond to human perception, which depend at least as much on the thermal (and mechanical) properties of what's underneath the material as the material itself. For example, the sensation of touching a clothed live person's arm is very different from touching a clothed mannequin, even if the clothing materials are identical. But even so, it's a big improvement on florid adjectives.

    Unfortunately, the website seems completely devoid of information about ordering their products or services, or on examples of their measurement results, which looks like a bad sign. It would be a pity if they were aiming to introduce an expensive proprietary standard. Many measurement standards in the physical world (e.g., ASTM) are hugely and disproportionately expensive (not to mention comparatively ancient in technical sophistication--Shore Durometer, anyone?). These costs form a significant barrier for small businesses attempting to introduce a novel product or material. A cynic might say that's precisely why large established enterprises provide financial support for those standards-setting organizations.

  9. stuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nope, just Wolowitz.

  10. 501 different materials now by BitterKraut · · Score: 1

    At special request, texture class "American Pie" has recently been added to the standard.

  11. More information here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.syntouchllc.com/Services/Tactile-Characterization/

    Includes a video. I found it interesting

    1. Re:More information here by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      The video doesn't have working sound (for me), but the information below is worth it.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com