Slashdot Mirror


Domestic Terrorists Could Use OSINT To Pinpoint US Substations For a Blackout (darkreading.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A project called 'Gridstrike' found that free and publicly available information can be used to determine the most critical electric substations in the US, which if attacked, could result in a nationwide blackout. Researchers from iSIGHT Partners used a combination of publicly available transmission substation information, maps, Google Earth, and grid congestion documentation, and drew correlations among the substations that serve the top ten cities in the US. They ID'ed 15 substations that if attacked and knocked offline would result in a nationwide blackout, they say. Their research took the spin of whether a homegrown terror group with little funding could get this crucial information. The study was inspired by the 2013 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) study in 2013 that found that attacks on just nine electric substations in the U.S. could cause a blackout across the entire grid.

97 comments

  1. Redundancy cuts into profits by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's what you get when you let your critical infrastructure design by entities that care more about profit than providing that critical infrastructure.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I assume your house has a backup refrigerator and stove in case one of the primaries goes down :) Seriously, our grid is in far more danger from a CME taking it out. The chances of multiple, coordinated, successful terrist attacks blacking out the country are miniscule. Chalk this story and its ilk up to security theatre industry's version of sabre-rattling.

    2. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't need to backup your fridge with a fridge and a stove with a stove.

      Hospitals don't have an extra power grid laying around to backup the first one. They use diesel generators and batteries.

    3. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't protect yourself enough against attacks on central nodes in the net. It's almost impossible. And it's not that hard to find out key nodes in the electrical grid using just Google Earth and some patience. That's not unique to the US but essentially applicable to every modern country.

      It also highlights that everyone is responsible for doing their part when it comes to disaster preparedness. Keep some fuel, dry food and canned stuff around that can be used when things go sour. But modern society has evolved into a situation where we do our daily shopping run for food for the day and the day when we can't do it we are going hungry.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re: Redundancy cuts into profits by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      I only made my system quindecuply redundant. Why oh why didn't I make it sexdecuply redundant.

    5. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by gtall · · Score: 2

      And you base this opinion on your deep analysis of the grid and its power suppliers? Hell, you should run to be the next Trump.

    6. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I assume your house has a backup refrigerator and stove in case one of the primaries goes down

      Everyone that lives in an old house where it snows has a backup for both. The garage/outside is a wonderful secondary fridge and everyone with an old house has at least one fireplace.

      Don't think everyone lives as precariously as you do.

    7. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      Actually they do. Hospitals have separate circuits for critical life support and operating theatre equipment which has separate backup.

      While it's not great if you x-ray machine looses power it is a whole deal better than the ventilator loosing power or a heart bypass machine in theatre loosing power.

    8. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . But modern society has evolved into a situation where we do our daily shopping run for food for the day and the day when we can't do it we are going hungry.

      You realize that "modern society" has evolved exactly away from this? This is exactly the situation that existed before the advent of refrigeration, people would go to the market daily to get food for dinner and tomorrow's breakfast and most meats had to be smoked or salted to keep them from spoiling. I understand that Europeans (on average) still tend to live closer to this model than most Americans, which is why Americans moving over tend to be dismayed at the size of the kitchens and particularly the refrigerators.

      Time to do a little catching up on history.

    9. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows what a bunch pork licking women ISIS is. How? They avoid Wall Street; and say "please" when in the presence of Goldman Sacks board members.

    10. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Informative

      US hospitals have four "independent" power networks, although most rooms only have two (normal branch and critical branch). Moreover, critical equipment generally also has internal batteries.

      Back to the utility grid, the design is to be maintainable rather than fault-tolerant. Maintenance causes limited impact in theory. Faults are isolated and can be repaired. Personally, I think everyone should have a small backup power source-- when Mother Nature or nut jobs do something bad it could take significant time to repair to 100%.

    11. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Errr no, that's what you get when you don't stupendously over gold plate your electricity grid while serving a bunch of customers who are used to paying next to nothing for your product.

    12. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to spend time on Google Earth/Maps. The analysis has been done by the FERC and summarized by the WSJ:
      http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304020104579433670284061220

      The quote that matters:
      “destroy nine interconnection substations and a transformer and a transformer
      manufacturer and the entire United States grid would be down for at least 18 months,
      probably longer."

      I'm pretty good at digging up OSINT and I don't usually self-censor when I find it, but in this case:
      #1: a) headline confirmed & b) it wasn't very hard
      #2: Out of respect for the grave consequences and extreme expense of remedying this problem I'm going to do something unusual and be responsible with information.

    13. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If suddenly being without power is no problem to you, no problem there.

      New York might disagree that a blackout is no problem, though.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      New York will disagree even more if they had to pay the cost for a "perfect" electricity network.
      I've been there. I watched as our politicians shouted from the rooftops that they will force companies to improve infrastructure. Retail prices have risen 350% in the past 10 years, but man do we have an awesome grid now.

      Funny enough now our politicians are criticising the "gold plating" of our electrical network saying that people should not expect a 100% reliable network and our last election was fought on the premise of reducing the cost of electricity. And that's true. You shouldn't expect a 100% reliable everything, the cost of perfection needs to be balanced against the impact, and quite frankly a power outage while chaotic doesn't end the world and can be worked around (i.e. backup generation at critical points).

      I got a few interesting points from your link though:
      1. The problem is criminals and looters.
      2. The police made arrests (system is working).
      3. There were no deaths.
      4. The cost was $300million (about the cost of 15 HV substation upgrades before you consider any redundancy in cabling).
      5. Most of those costs were the result of crime.

      But I think that says more about NYC crime and residents than it does about NYC power.

    15. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two refrigerators and one stove in the house. But there is a camping stove stored in the garage, along with solar panels in the back yard and two generators in the shed.

    16. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume your house has a backup refrigerator and stove in case one of the primaries goes down :)

      Well I do have backup options for both of those things, although no not in case the primaries fail.
      It's just good sense.

      There is the main fridge in the kitchen and another in the basement. The basement one is more "long term" storage compared to the kitchen one, but enough stuff could be moved completely into either in case of a failure to prevent too much loss to spoilage.

      I have two BBQ grills, a large one out in the shed, and a small portable "camping" gas stove as well.

      What's funny, in recent years we have had TWO bass blackouts resulting in no grid power for many days in a row.

      A huge winter storm in '09 or '10 had us without power for 6 days in the dead of winter.
      Before that in '03 was another blackout for 3 days in the middle of summer.

      For the winter blackout that camping gas stove stayed right outside the back door on the porch (aka the not quite 3' x 3' steps to the back door) for cooking - as there was a good 4 feet of snow the morning after that storm and the shed was inaccessible, at least easily.
      A fireplace kept us from freezing to death. The outside itself acted as a freezer.

      After a couple days when the snow was more manageable and paths were dug through the back yard, us and one neighbor had a couple community grill outs to provide cooked food for other neighbors less prepared for having no electricity in -10c days.

      The summer outage wasn't nearly as bad, both being much shorter of a time without power, but it was mid August with no AC.

      Relocating all the frozen goods from the kitchen to the basement fridge, and keeping the basement fridge closed the remainder of the time, was enough to keep a couple hundred dollars worth of food from spoiling.

      Ever since that second outage I now have a small generator in the shed and a couple larger gas cans for it as well.
      Thankfully I've yet had an occasion to need it, but feel if such another week long outage of the grid happened not only would I easily survive but may be able to do so just a little comfortably too.

    17. Re: Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol yeah right. Americans are dismayed at the fridge size because they can't stack properly and because it's all about appearance for them. Also the fridge does you no good at all when the grid goes down and its summer. If you have a stash of dried foods and another stash of pickled and otherwise preserved foods (not canned i.e. bought but in glass in a pressure canner oder event just in the oven) under a vacuum or soured like sauerkraut then you can last without a fridge. If you don't have this then your big fat fridge will last you one or two days.

    18. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we have monitors for transformer ground current tied to NOAA reports and will cut back in the event of a flare. That's about all I can say really.
      The difference is that the transformer is disconnected and shunted when the ground current exceeds a threshhold. That means if no parallel source is available then yes, we drop load = a power outage. The "outage" is the duration of the extreme flare..read severe class here, not your every day x class. The alternative? If we had no such system the transformers would burn up and the power would be out for da

    19. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I know you've had some replies but I'd like to add that you'd probably die up where my house is and I live in the US. Well, you might not die but you'd probably end up leaving - assuming you could.

      I live in an unincorporated township, in NW Maine, many miles from a village, and a lot of miles for a real town, and hours from a city of any size. I can be in Canada quicker than I can be in a moderately sized town.

      Yes, I retired there on purpose but I am cheating and wintering in Florida this year.

      At any rate - I have backups for all of those things. In all actuality, the mains power is my backup. I've multiple ways to heat, cook, and store food. I have multiple food suppliers - though I prefer to grow, fish, or hunt for most of it. It's fun. But, yeah, you might die with that sort of thinking.

      Yes, we lose a few people here every year to weather/temperature related causes. Usually they were unprepared for one reason or another. So long as you're prepared then it's not too bad. Most of us live in small villages, towns, and whatnot. It's easier in those places. I have solar, wind, two generators, underground diesel tanks, and grid power - for example. I don't just have a plow truck, I have a backup. I own a couple of snowmobiles should I need them. The list goes on.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    20. Re:Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true companies love spending on transmission equipment, but only because they get a guaranteed return on investment. They have to get approval for that though, and people don't want higher electric bills.

      The counterargument is that utilities don't have large profit margins. So this is really on the people not want to pay for better infrastructure, whether it be via a utility or through a public solution. The same applies to most American infrastructure.

    21. Re: Redundancy cuts into profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually at some point you have to acknowledge that risk can never be made zero and every addition "9" of reliability typically costs another 10x-100x in cost so the Cost-Benefit ratio pretty quickly hits "unfeasible" and you should have simply stopped long before that. Anyone who says otherwise is either too ignorant of reality to be a meaningful advisor or stakeholder OR is too corrupt and likely benefiting from irrational fear by trying to build out more "9's" than should exist. In other case, it's wrong to seek "zero risk" because it necessarily has "infinite cost", mathematically.

  2. An open sources investigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One should ponder upon this http://www.cybersquirrel1.com/ might it really be the time to stop being afraid and not buy into the fear mongering going on all over the globe ?

  3. After 9/11 we erected concrete barriers aka a WALL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Trump jokes aside, it worked and the only way terrorists are getting in is social engineering or a drone delivered bomb.

    Here's an example of one I saw by a Meijer while visiting family this holiday: https://www.google.com/maps/@42.5377077,-83.1838428,3a,75y,103.25h,84.91t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sX2tgS8AwSpo7QlxFj2Q3jQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1

  4. What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wrote this summary???

  5. I sniff glue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then vandalize wikipedia.

    I need help.

    1. Re:I sniff glue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brah --

      I'm in Johannesberg, There isn't shit to do here except use drugs. If we can't get glue, we put those old skool 5" floppy disks under a lighter and sniff the fumes.

    2. Re:I sniff glue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you're kidding. Those old 5.25" disks potentially contain invaluable data. Many people are trying to figure out ways of preserving the data on those disks, not destroy the data.

    3. Re:I sniff glue by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Huffing poisonous fumes, on the other hand, is a perfectly good way of getting rid of hopeless, worthless dopers.

    4. Re:I sniff glue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brah --

      I'm in Johannesberg, There isn't shit to do here except use drugs. If we can't get glue, we put those old skool 5" floppy disks under a lighter and sniff the fumes.

      Why don't you just huff some gas, or paint?

  6. Video for You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:4b2f4139c20b4064f06570dbefd4eb102533556d&dn=Spartakus+and+the+Sun+Beneath+the+Sea+1985+ENG+RUS+FR+HUN+%2836+pa&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969

  7. Doesn't take a terrorist attack by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Planned attack? It doesn't need that, just a couple of accidents or screw-ups at the same inopportune times. One mistake by a rookie engineer in Arizona took out the grid for most of southern California. One or two more mistakes or equipment failures while they were still trying to recover from the first one could've seen the entire grid west of the Rockies go down. And the main cause is frankly the profit motive: for the sake of efficiency and cost-effectiveness the generation and transmission companies have eliminated the majority of the redundancy in the system and put off expensive maintenance and upgrades as long as the system wasn't failing during normal operation. It wouldn't take a group of terrorists, just a couple of maintenance engineers more interested in getting home for dinner than in following every rule to the letter or system operators who haven't had their morning coffee and are still a bit groggy.

    1. Re:Doesn't take a terrorist attack by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "One mistake by a rookie engineer in Arizona took out the grid for most of southern California"

      That's what can happen when the most highly populated state depends on the nukes and the dams of Arizona for its power.

  8. Ban OSINT by Dynamoo · · Score: 1
    This OSINT sounds dangerous and should be banned.

    ;)

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  9. OSINT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck wrote this shit??

  10. Re:After 9/11 we erected concrete barriers aka a W by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Well, if the terrorist crashing the planes into WTC instead had crashed them into the key nodes in the grid the effects would have been a lot worse. Then imagine that done timed to an extreme cold spell - that would cause a lot of water pipes to freeze and crack.

    But also realize that it can still happen. Many electrical grid nodes don't have much personnel on site - if any at all, most of them are controlled remotely and are only monitored by cameras.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  11. Dangerous: Travel Guide Maps, Geography lessons,.. by burni2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SARCASM_ON:
    Because it tells you where to find the leaning tower of pisa, therefore you do now know how to damage the itallian economy by demolishing that building.

    Threat cleared:
    I call for a ban on all travel maps therefore nobody will be able to find these places.

    More Threats
    I call for a ban on teaching geography!
    The maps show industrial buildings, transport infrastruture and natural resources!

    SARCASM_OFF:

    OSINT, INTINT, TINTINTIN
    So long for calling public accessable information and teaching material OSINT, I call bull shit on this try to infiltrate the common language with this intelligence "cool" style new speak!

  12. there is a solution by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the solution to this is to completely decentralize our power, virtually destroying "the grid" by putting solar+battery at every home. it wont work for absolutely everyone but it will work for the vast majority of people. it comes with nice side effects too: it will cause people to buy more efficient electronics, lower the price of solar panels, devastate the coal/gas industry which in turn will cause a massive reduction in CO2 emissions and result in fewer mountain tops being blown up.

    so you get security, energy independence, massive pollution reduction and preserving the environment. what's not to like? oh yeah, it doesn't pay congress critters to stay in office, so it wont happen. #BanCongress ;-P

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in Juno, Alaska. Explain how solar is a viable option for me.

    2. Re:there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... and the industry producing those nice solar panels and batteries will be powered by - what? Ah, I see. Engineering is not your strong side, right?

    3. Re: there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe Philips solved that one for ya ;) https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.osapublishing.org/viewmedia.cfm%3Furi%3Doe-18-S1-A112%26seq%3D0&ved=0ahUKEwj549bpz5zKAhVGvRQKHeirDGIQFggeMAA&usg=AFQjCNHsBrH7vodQnEr8MULMt8f3EUc49A&sig2=Mtf4i8EVvGZMVBgsuOZW8A

    4. Re:there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I live in Juno, Alaska. Explain how solar is a viable option for me.

      OK, hold up guys, as AC points out, this idea clearly doesn't work for 100% of the population, unlike all our other ideas which work for everyone, everywhere. We'll have to go back to the drawing board.

    5. Re:there is a solution by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      the solution to this is to completely decentralize our power, virtually destroying "the grid" by putting solar+battery at every home...

      Thank you! I jumped on here to say pretty much the same thing. I'd just like to add that we can have our cake and eat it too. We can disconnect small local grids from the larger grids and use them to pool the local outputs from wind, solar, and possibly even nuclear generation. That way we can have independence down to the residence level, while being able to take advantage of the benefits of sharing power when necessary.

      Another thing to consider is the dumpster-sized reactors that can provide power for 10K to 20K homes, or for factories. I don't love nuclear, but I also don't love AGW, and at least in the short term, nukes may be a necessary evil for rapidly cutting greenhouse gas emissions. (That, and foregoing cattle as a food source - but I digress).

      The point being that continental power grids are dinosaurs and we need to hasten their extinction. We have much better alternatives at hand, and will develop even better ones at a faster rate if we get off our complacent asses and start using to full advantage the techniques and technologies currently available. Right now we're staring at an awesome and wildly varied smorgasbord of potentially planet-saving options while we continue to chow down on Big Macs.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    6. Re: there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing there's no geothermal or wind energy up there.

      With no electricity, move, or survive.

    7. Re:there is a solution by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      " completely decentralize our power, virtually destroying "the grid" by putting solar+battery at every home."

      To what then are the wind and solar farms going to connect?

      Actually, the technical push right now is to revamp the grid to accommodate these medium-scale renewable sources. This means users getting 'smart meters' that not only continuously inform the grid of usage, but which can turn off the A/C and the electric range at times when the wind isn't blowing hard enough to serve the region.

    8. Re:there is a solution by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      ... and the industry producing those nice solar panels and batteries will be powered by - what? Ah, I see. Engineering is not your strong side, right?

      the sun.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    9. Re:there is a solution by Dereck1701 · · Score: 2

      "completely decentralize our power"

      That would definitely be a good thing, but you don't even need to go that far. Every decently sized city/region should have their own co-generation power plant in addition to a decent amount of residential solar/wind generation. There would still be a national grid to handle electrical demand in the case of plant maintenance, extremely high demand, an accident or some kind of disaster. But in the case of something happening to the national grid each city/region could trip the fuses leading out of the city and run on their own. There is an example of this in my own area, during the last major blackout (2003 North East blackout) a village with their own power plant cut themselves off from the grid and powered the city on their own until the grid was restored. Waste heat from each facility could be used to heat nearby homes/businesses in the winter or provide heat for industrial applications.

    10. Re:there is a solution by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, it doesn't pay congress critters to stay in office, so it wont happen.

      Contrary to popular belief, congress critters need our votes to stay in office. Now, if you all keep reelecting them, all I can ask is WFT is wrong with you? If you want to change the rules, you have to elect people that will change them. Simple enough?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re:there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you get security, energy independence, massive pollution reduction and preserving the environment. what's not to like?

      I'm not strongly against it, but let's not pretend that it has no downsides. Maybe just a single big one.
        - Cost (obvious one). Solar is still more expensive than e.g. nuclear per watt ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source ). Plus, purchasing the solar panels, batteries and wiring would require an unprecedented investment campaign. This could lead to economic instability. If the price of energy is higher, businesses and startups are discouraged from trying energy-hungry projects. Take the PC. One prereuisite for PCs becoming so ubiquitous was that cheap electricity was available. If there was a significant power cost to run a PC, people wouldn't have used it for games etc. After it has been established, we could make it more efficient.
        - There will probably be more infrastructure to maintain, requiring highly qualified engineers. Hard to predict though, as one could get rid of some of the transmission lines. Yay, more jobs, you say? see: "Broken window fallacy" .
      - Batteries wear out over a decade or so, so there is a high maintenance (recurring) cost.
      -

    12. Re:there is a solution by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      the solution to this is to completely decentralize our power, virtually destroying "the grid" by putting solar+battery at every home. it wont work for absolutely everyone but it will work for the vast majority of people.

      I live in Juno, Alaska. Explain how solar is a viable option for me.

      i'm sorry, power sources cannot teach you to read.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    13. Re:there is a solution by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular belief, congress critters need our votes to stay in office. Now, if you all keep reelecting them, all I can ask is WFT is wrong with you? If you want to change the rules, you have to elect people that will change them. Simple enough?

      that's just it though. there is a problem with people and the election system in general.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    14. Re:there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... it doesn't pay congress critters to stay in office ...

      Who's going to pay the $30,000 to make each home a power station? Who's going to clean the photo-voltaic panels and replace the batteries, for ongoing operation? It saves land, since one doesn't need to build a solar farm but otherwise, it just moves the costs around.

      This plan will work on single family homes, but not on multiple-storey buildings. At best the windows need to be replaced with photo-voltaic panels then extra wiring added. Even that won't work as the shadows from adjacent buildings will block the sun.

      A different method of power generation will be required for the inner suburbs of a city. I prefer micro-distribution: Every street has a power station using fuel cells to provide the electricity. Yes, it means acquiring land and building infrastructure for the 'fuel' supply. Living green is expensive, and worse, needs to be built-in, not bolted onto, city infrastructure.

    15. Re:there is a solution by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Your house power comes over underground wires from the neighborhood power generator, run from molten salt heated by underground DC trunk wires. If you lose the local genny you bring in a generator, lose the trunk lines the system will still run for a day while you fix it. The power can come from solar/wind/tidal/whatever as it doesn't need to be constant. Total system is also highly resistant to weather, including solar flares.

    16. Re:there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Juno, Alaska.

      If you did, you would know it was spelled Juneau. If you wanted to pick a random Alaskan town where solar might be a problem, you should have picked on Barrow or Fairbanks.

      Alaska is actually a pretty good place for nuclear power, but anything is better than fossil fuels.

  13. Terrorists want to terroize, not annoy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone involved in publishing this article is stupid. From TFA, to submitter, to the editor who submitted this.

    "Terrorists" want "terror". They want to kill people, they want smoking buildings and bombed, shot cars and a whole lot injured and dead people. That causes terror. YOU have to fear you will get shot/bombed when you leave the house, go shopping, go on a vacation. That is achieved by maximum terror.

    They do not want to "effectively damage the infrastructure". That is what a solider would do to achieve a military goal. Yes, it would be smart and effective. Some people might die (e.g. in hostiptals), the economic damage would be massive - but it surely would not be terror, for most of us it would be "annoying".

    They are called "Terroists" for a reason and not "Annoyoists".

    Furthermore: there might be smart planners behind terror attacks, but mostly it is the ideologists and strategists who are actually pretty smart. Most terrorists are actually not smart.
    The usual terrorist gets a gun or a bomb by his supervisor and is shoved out of the door to do his terror. The smartest ones so far we had were those who were able to fly planes. And even that scores relatively low on the "Hollywood List of Creative Terror-Plots".

    1. Terrorists want terror. Attacks on the infrastructure per se are not "terror".
    2. Most terror groups are too stupid to pull a coordinated attack on "infrastructure" off.

    IF infrastrcuture (traffic, airports, trains etc) is hit it is NOT about the infrastructure but about the "terror" on the population.

    Go away with your fearmongering!

    1. Re:Terrorists want to terroize, not annoy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everyone involved in publishing this article is stupid. From TFA, to submitter, to the editor who submitted this.

      "Terrorists" want "terror". They want to kill people, they want smoking buildings and bombed, shot cars and a whole lot injured and dead people. That causes terror. YOU have to fear you will get shot/bombed when you leave the house, go shopping, go on a vacation.

      Err, no. A terrorist is one who uses violence to achieve his political aims. Extremist muslims want to destroy the western influence on the world (it is a bit hard to prove to people that your beliefs are the way to a better life when there those who are not of your extremist views who are doing better then you and are not afraid to flaunt it) and the easiest way to do that would be to destroy the countries in question economically. Destroying the electrical grid in the US would cripple the economy to the point where law and order will begin to break down. You could question whether or not this would actually have the desired effect on the US in the long term as a disaster of this magnitude could either swing to a break up of the states or unite the country in a way that has not been seen ever.
      That said, an attack of this magnitude would require a lot of planning and coordination and it would be noticed long before the attacks were carried out (even if only by accident)...

    2. Re: Terrorists want to terroize, not annoy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extremist Muslims you say?
      http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/
      We have more to fear from high calorie diets than we do from Muslims.

  14. The US grid is designed to... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    work even if an event like Northeast blackout of 1965 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... could happen again. The still slightly separated and distinct grids are pushed to the limits and beyond thanks to poor design, lack of national planning, errors, over usage and the important sites per state, city stays up even when the grid power fails locally.
    When the US grid fails locally most of the federal and important sites have really well designed, bespoke deep back up power. Inner city ares might not have power, some folks might do stuff in the dark, banking services might not work but the US mil bases, larger teaching hospitals, well guarded gov and mil storage site, bases will be just fine.
    Why? They suffer black out and brownouts every decade due to a lack of local grid reliability.
    Most of the security cleared shift workers have trained for years about what to do when a really unexpected event occurs. Stay at work, traditionally expect a land line phone call or pager or other contact if away from work or just return to work by default if no contact is made due to total power loss.
    The shift at work can manage until their expert co worker drive in just as trained.
    Most advanced nations have kind of "trained" their vital infrastructure staff for all kinds of strange events over different decades.
    The USA has had several different larger events eg 1965 or 2003 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... that have given decades of standard operating procedures to a total power loss events over hours, days or much longer per state, region, city, federally.
    What happens next? The faults are traced back, contractors have staff, funds and equipment made available just like during a really big storm, flood or other state wide event.
    A new narrative of spending more on some expensive tech, enlarge or grant more hidden powers to the federal bureaucracy, enrich foreign contractors with a US front company to "rent" a fancy security new solution is always interesting.
    "Substations" are deigned to be isolated, fixed and are really well understood by gov, private sector owners and operators. Every part of the grid can turn off, on and be fixed over time. Just as its fixed during normal maintenance or after unexpected big storms or massive once in a generation floods, weather... or after another brownout https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... .

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:The US grid is designed to... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The real problems aren't 13-hour outages, they are outages that can last a month or more. A good earthquake in the right place destroys the insulators on transmission lines, and shuts down natural gas service. This takes a huge amount of time to repair. Likewise, damaging transmission transformers requires substantial time to repair/replace.

      Fortunately, distributed generation can limit the impact of these major events, but if requires power plants in your backyard to work. When you import power from other areas then it is hard to recover-- too many links in the chain.

  15. Yo dawg, I heard you like fear... by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yo dawg, I heard you like fear, so I got some fear to put on top of your fear next to your fear....

    I went to a DHS conference in Boston a few years after 9/11, and it was a wall-to-wall exhibition of all the crazy ways the bad guys were going to get us. Grid attacks, bus attacks, backflushing municipal hydrants with poisoned water, poisoning drinking water supplies, spraying anthrax on the lettuce in the supermarket. 99% of it were "weaknesses" conjured up by security researchers to get some money from the golden spigot labeled DHS.

    The DHS basically put the brakes on this and started demanding solutions, not a laundry list of insane attack vectors.

    The upshot is, any reasonably complex distribution system will have security vulnerabilities, dependent on the definition of "vulnerability". Some "vulnerabilities" are highly improbable, difficult to exploit, and only cause temporary or low-level disruption. Other vulnerabilities are obvious, easy to exploit, and will take down society. Without getting hysterical about it, the sensible thing to do is to make the vulnerabilities hard to exploit i.e. get infrastructure control systems airgapped and off the fucking Internet (duh). Make the system fault tolerant - if they do blow up something, have a means to contain it.

    Can we do this and get on with our lives, please? These vulnerabilities have been talked about for decades, we know what the solutions are, but no one wants to pay for it. Industry and government are staring at each other expecting the other to pick up the tab. If that is the situation nothing will get done, ever. Critical infrastructure needs to be nationalized so it is clear who is in charge of maintenance and security. Industry won't pay unless it hits their bottom line.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Yo dawg, I heard you like fear... by ve3oat · · Score: 1

      ... whether a homegrown terror group with little funding could get this crucial information

      So what? A homegrown terror group with little funding still won't be able to carry out a credible attack.
      More fear, more perpetual war ... etc.

    2. Re:Yo dawg, I heard you like fear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Other vulnerabilities are obvious, easy to exploit, and will take down society. Without getting hysterical about it, the sensible thing to do is to make the vulnerabilities hard to exploit i.e. get infrastructure control systems airgapped and off the fucking Internet (duh). Make the system fault tolerant - if they do blow up something, have a means to contain it. "

      And since the vulnerabilities are so obvious and easy to exploit, and no one has exploited that yet, we all agree to agree that this terrorism hysteria is bullshit.

      Of course we continue to improve the infrastructure, but we also continue to stop being hysterical.

    3. Re:Yo dawg, I heard you like fear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This grid attack would require nine people with rifles to shoot a transformer from afar at the same time in nine different locations.

      That is not that difficult. This is a legitimate concern. There is also the legitimate concern of a Carrington Event-level Coronal Mass Ejection hitting us. More spending on the transmission infrastructure would be prudent.

      AEP and some others are starting a coalition to stock up on the long lead-time transformers (which I don't think are even manufactured in the US, though I might be wrong on that part). That is a good start.

  16. What's to stop them pesky terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From
    - using Google Maps and Earth?
    - Actually getting their friends in the US to drive around and map these critical installtions?
    - buying large scale maps

    Storm in a teacup if you ask me.

  17. This is how we know terrorism is minuscule by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    At least within the borders of the US, terrorism is clearly minuscule. Our infrastructure is in general fragile and unprotected. Even major metropolitan areas have choke points of just one or two substations which could easily be destroyed by anyone with a little ingenuity. This doesn't happen, even though this has been the state of affairs all along.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Excellent Until You Swerved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your synopsis and assessment were perfect, and then suddenly you swerved off the road and into the weeds with that bit about the "need" to nationalize the grid.

    There is no doubt about who is in charge of maintenance and security. The owners of that section of the electrical generation and distribution system are responsible for its maintenance ans security. They know this well, and will be the first to point this out. They also answer, on a high level, to state level public service commissions.

    With reasonable care, which I feel many or most do exhibit, there is not large scale wide area risk, just the fear mongering that you illustrated. If Los Angeles or New York get blacked out, it will be a significant inconvenience, especially for those, possibly millions, sitting in the dark for a few days. It might even spill into a larger economic impact in so much as Wall Street being impacted. But, it certainly won;t be the end of the world. People everywhere else; Dallas, Seattle, Chicago, Miami, Denver, Minneapolis, San Francisco... They aren't going to notice and the country will continue on just fine.

    Nationalizing the grid, making a distributed system into a centrally controlled and government mismanaged system would be a spectacularly bad idea.

    1. Re:Excellent Until You Swerved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinking about preventing a widespread cyber attack seems wise for this widespread outage scenario.

      Nationalizing it would put this under the experts, like OPM. Maybe we should re-think that. Perhaps having national requirements, but even that might make a homogeneous system where one hack gives you the keys to the kingdom.

      Air gaping may be a similar story. Having a high wall around you makes you worry less about what happens once somebody gets behind the wall. The Maginot line didn't work out so well.

      First thing to do might be to make sure there are no default passwords or backdoors anywhere near major substations and especially the NOC's that control them. For example, have there been any Juniper vpn boxes around, have these been patched, and have all the machines behind them been reloaded?

      Second thing might be to re-think the control architecture to not put all our eggs in one basket. The problem is controlling a collection of remote sites in a coordinated way. This requires a central facility, which is a necessary risk point. Perhaps a way might be to build a control pair for each remote site. The pair would be the remote hardware access slave device and a separate-for-the-site master computer in the NOC. The pair could be built with layers of security using keys just for that pair. Pairs could be built differently providing a less homogeneous attack surface. At the NOC, the central control computer would talk to each site master to manage the network. If things go bad, the central computer could be disconnected and humans could operate the network by manually interacting with each site master. Given the right firewalls (maybe hardware based and working at the application level?) between each site master and the central controller, this seems like it might make an attack more trouble than it is worth.

      In the meantime, I'll keep propane for the camper fridge so I can keep the beer cool.

  19. "Concern" by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    "We were extremely concerned about the amount of publicly available information"

    Then you're "concerned" about the wrong thing. Any idiot driving down the road can see "Oh, there's a huge substation with lots of power lines coming out of it, its probably important". "Hiding" it by removing its existence from public documentation doesn't do a thing to improve safety/security. Fixing the issue entails actually FIXING it, not hiding the fact that a problem exists. Build more backup substations, install more circuit breakers and improve power plants to endure unexpected spikes/drops in electrical usage coinciding with disasters both man-made and natural.

    1. Re:"Concern" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're asking the wrong question.

      The right question is "Why isn't this happening all the time because it's so flipping easy?"

      The future question *might* be what the fear mongers want you to think, but the reality is; there is VERY LITTLE TERRORISM (ALMOST NONE).

    2. Re:"Concern" by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

      Of course we shouldn't go out of our way to prepare for incidents that don't even show as a rounding error in overall mortality statistics. On a global scale in the past 10 years only about 303 Americans have died due to any form of terrorism, in roughly that same time period 313 people in the US have been killed by lighting. You're literally more likely to die via lightning than terrorism. However there are nutjobs out there, there are also accidents, negligence & natural disasters, so the grid SHOULD be built to take punishment (both natural and man-made).

  20. Just one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just one problem with your plan...it won't work. There simply isn't enough energy hitting most places to do what you claim.

  21. Don't use OSINT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux, FreeBSD,and OS X are all much better.

  22. Not a terrorism issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is much less a weakness to terrorism and much more a weakness in the infrastructure system in its inability to fail gracefully.

  23. Security through obscurity... never works by gavron · · Score: 1

    If you actually read the article it goes on to say "...never publicly revealed the crucial substations ID'ed by FERC for obvious reasons, nor does iSIGHT plan to disclose publicly the ones it found...."

    So they never publicly revealed the "crucial" substations, have done nothing to make them less "crucial" (I think they mean critical) and have no plans to "disclose" (I think they mean reveal) the ones they found.

    This is either a spoof of a 1980s evil-soviet-Russia-movie or something because if it's real it has to be the STUPIDEST LAMEST excuse for secops people not doing their jobs rights.

    This shouldn't be hidden "because oh no bad guys will find it" but rather "good guys might say oh no wait wtf really???"

    Ehud

    1. Re:Security through obscurity... never works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually a serious problem and they are working on it(albeit at a glacial pace, and from a incrementalism approach).

  24. Ignorant trite from someone not ready to pay by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

    That's what you get when you let your critical infrastructure design by entities that care more about profit than providing that critical infrastructure.

    I'm eager to hear your discourse on capital expenditures in the electricity industry, and how increased redundancy would impact the electricity bill of the average homeowner and business. I assume you have an in-depth analysis, including a prepared power point slide, that includes extensive analysis in this area.

    Or maybe you just wanted to say "HAHA Look how much smarter I am than EVERY utility in the country, and how much smarter I am than EVERY public utilities commission in the country. I'm not in a position to decide how limited resources are best spent, but I can make snarky comments about the people who bear this responsibility!"

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Ignorant trite from someone not ready to pay by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Meanwhile, the utilities go "If I turn of this power station now for 'maintenance', the other power stations I own will be able to charge at least 25% more. Make it so."

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Ignorant trite from someone not ready to pay by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      This is what I was saying when I asked if he had spent money for redundant refrigeration and cooking for his own use; sadly, all the ACs chose to misunderstand me.

  25. What You Can Do About It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of stupidly terrorizing yourself with fear, anxiety, and stress, there's what you can do about it (I wish every story had a section like this):

    1) When you're done with that milk/juice bottle, wash it out, near fill it with water, then put it in your freezer and forget about it. When the power goes out, the ice will help keep the freezer cool. If you end up with water supply issues, you'll have a minor store of fresh water to drink too. If you have the room, make a couple ice bottles. Do the same in your fridge too.
    2) Make sure you have enough winter clothing + blanks to survive the coldest days and nights in your area.
    3) Keep some long-term food that doesn't require cooking to eat. Make sure you can manually open the packaging.
    4) Know basic first aid and basic self defense as nowadays you won't be able to call for help with the power dies. Not that you should ever rely on 911 for anything. At anytime they could be too busy to get to you and even then, you'll have to deal with whatever it is before calling 911 anyway.
    5) Don't worry about being unable to contact your loved ones. If you guys can't handle being out of contact for a few days or longer, you're really immature.
    6) Handling special life support systems are specific to those systems so I can't go into those and most people don't have them anyway.
    7) Keep a months supply of cash in your house for basic needs like buying food and water. You likely won't have access to banks and may have trouble paying bills (but hopefully the companies will have trouble too and won't charge everyone late fees. You could auto-pay, but I never trust companies to charge me properly and correcting bad charges is harder than not making them. Plus they'll claim it was your responsibility to make sure auto-pay worked so they'll probably charge you late fees anyway. Too bad class action lawsuits are against every terms agreement now.)
    8) Have a paper map of your surrounding area.

    There now. Do those things and sleep restfully at night without worrying about things out of your control.

    Any other advice?

  26. Yeehadists aren't that smart by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

    Those domestic terrorists can't even set up a siege without bringing enough food with them. What makes you think they're going to read?

    1. Re:Yeehadists aren't that smart by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

      without *failing* to bring enough food.

  27. I live ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... in the Pacific Northwest. In the service territory of an electric utility that, for all intents and purposes, failed financially over a decade ago. It's getting difficult to differentiate between a terrorist's blackout and normal daily operations. So I'm ready.

    A terrorist attack might take out a key substation while a windstorm will knock down a pole, taking out my neighborhood. Since the utility doesn't have a stockpile of spares or the line crews available to install them, for me its all the same. Fire up the generator and ride through it.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:I live ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And realistically: this is probably the most cost effective solution to the problem. Harass the population with intermittent power in to providing their own backup infrastructure, and then conservatively pop the breakers during outages to avoid rolling blackouts overloading infrastructure. It's a much less brittle solution than the failure in systems thinking currently being advocated by the FERC.

  28. I made a comment about this years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A guy with a .22 could do serious damage to the electric grid by taking out transformers.

    The fact that it is so ridiculously easy and the fact that it doesn't happen *regularly* is pretty damning proof that the threat of terrorism is exceedingly small and you should ignore any people who try to make you fear terrorism, because ALMOST ALL PEOPLE AREN'T INSANE TERRORISTS.

    1. Re:I made a comment about this years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same AC here... it is also incredible to me that an antagonistic nation hasn't organized something like this under the guise of terrorism.

      Are the risks of discovery too large?

      In sum-- shit is vulnerable, but most people aren't assholes.

  29. The enemy is US, not terrorists... by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Well said. The North American power grid was built out as needed, where needed... in every instance adding just enough spare capacity to accommodate Summer or Winter peaks without alarming long-term investors. Few redundant interconnects. There was no Central Planning Committee deciding how much redundancy may be required, and especially no paranoid engineering on what are essentially un-protectable fragile spans of infrastructure. As with most other modern systems its very existence relies on human restraint.

    Which is why only the dreariest of personalities are attracted to the "terrorist alarm industry" where people stay up nights brainstorming all the various things terrorists could do... so terrorists don't have to. They share their findings to an excitable tabloid press and hold conferences, tongues lolling and eyes rolling back as they receive a congratulatory 'pat' on the head for proclaiming the latest "thing" that terrorists could do. In the place of the Cold War excess we now have a behemoth DHS arm of the government who considers the US as its enemy. Every penny spent on it has been wasted.

    The real problem --- if in fact there is one --- is that so many are engaged in this paranoid (but fun for them!) pastime of pointing out vulnerability to potential social malfeasance and so few have been engaged in advancing technology in ways that may alleviate all kinds of threat. This means the harnessing and producing of more energy, not less.

    Sorry! To all of you in the US who are pushing for micro-grids of wind and solar as a 'plus', it is not. It is a drain, a bad idea, and dangerously stupid. You are being isolationist and foolish, advocating the most expensive and ultimately disastrous options a time when half of all Americans have no savings whatsoever. As if the greatest industrial power the world has ever known should scale back to some quasi-medieval level of energy consumption. As if grid would be made 'better' by introducing countless points of failure (foreign made) devices. Yeah, let's take power generation outside shall we. During the first continent wide hard Winter freeze a hundred million might die from this Darwinian experiment. Meanwhile your ridiculous dreams will bankrupt us all. Every penny spent on it has been wasted. What stark clinical madness! Your own children will not forgive you this frankly 'hippie' level of denial, which has persisted for decades.

    The only way out of this mess is to create wealth the old fashioned way by the creation of something that did not exist before. A relatively few massive energy sources that are completely self-contained, defensible, protected from the elements, stock enough fuel for weeks or months or years, and help to decrease the corporate and personal cost of living. Some have heard me say it all before: put a national priority on grid scale DC-AC tech, build overlapping HVDC loops across the country to feed the legacy grid, and above all, feed those HVDC loops with nuclear energy --- yes, fission --- in ways that are proven and new ways we already know can be done.

    FRANKLY, everything else, including the mass distribution of fragile natural gas pipeline networks, are shit solutions.

    (the following is a repost but relevant to this discussion)

    Take a moment to review NERC EOP-005-2: System Restoration from Blackstart Resources. If you live in North America, plans described in this document are your only real line of defense from the chaos and harm that may arise from grid-down disaster. Here is a peek at some software tools used by the industry and Black Start specific enhancements in prog

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re: The enemy is US, not terrorists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerc CIP compliance is mandatory for assets self identified as critical or for assets by definition critical: control centers, assets with black start capacity, generation falicities of greater than 1gwh are among those critical by definition. Failure to pass a compliance audit can result in penalties. Nerc has levied over 150 million in fines in the last few years.

      The Nerc CIP standard is awful, and the auditors, for the most part, don't know their heads from a hole in the ground.

  30. Re:After 9/11 we erected concrete barriers aka a W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you really think a wall with metal gate is going to stop a terrorist attack ? That is for preventing copper theft not an attack by a team with explosives who will breach the metal door in seconds.

  31. The land take of the staions / routeing of lines by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    The land take of the stations / routeing of lines get's in the way as well.

    Also the nimby people don't like them as well.

  32. Stop hireing homers by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Stop hireing homers by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
  33. Re:Dangerous: Travel Guide Maps, Geography lessons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OSINT is acknowledgement that Security Through Obscurity is no longer an option. The acronym is a blessing to the security world regardless how you feel about making everything(including knowledge) sound more OPERATOR/Call of Duty. If people weren't so accustomed to ignoring good advice that isn't dressed up in secret squirrel/ninja wrapping paper then it wouldn't be necessary to resort to it.

  34. Re:The land take of the staions / routeing of line by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Which is a perfect example of there being situations where governments should have the right to overrule its people if it is for the greater good. Yes, that power has to be used with a lot of oversight and with enough red tape that it is uncomfortable and tedious to do, but the ability has to exist. There are times when the needs of the many outweigh the sensitivities of the egoists.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. OSINT is just what used to be called "research" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Open Source Intelligence Collection and Exploitation" is part of what used to be called "researching the target." Of course, Domestic Psychos will use OSINT. And our infrastructure is so fragile it doesn't take as much effort to damage it as the paranoid article mentions.

  36. all faggot shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this terrorism bullshit is done.

    All lies. All fucking done.

  37. Linux? is OSINT like Mint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is OSINT? A new Linux distro?

  38. Re:Dangerous: Travel Guide Maps, Geography lessons by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Ain't that new, the various ...INT acronyms have been around for over 65 years. Although not so far back I remember when even some of the derivative ...INT terms were classified in themselves. (At least I think I remember, memory getting hazy.)

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT