Slashdot Mirror


San Francisco Bay Area In Superbowl Surveillance Mode (wired.com)

An anonymous reader links to Wired's description of a surveillance society in miniature assembling right now in San Francisco: Super Bowl 50 will be big in every way. A hundred million people will watch the game on TV. Over the next ten days, 1 million people are expected to descend on the San Francisco Bay Area for the festivities. And, according to the FBI, 60 federal, state, and local agencies are working together to coordinate surveillance and security at what is the biggest national security event of the year.
Previous year's Superbowl security measures have included WMD sensors, database-backed facial recognition, and gamma-ray vehicle scanners. Given the fears and cautions in the air about this year's contest, it's easy to guess that the scanning and sensing will be even more prevalent this time.

95 comments

  1. This is why we only use products from the nest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because from the nest we not only feel safe, we are safe. The nest protects us. The nest nourishes us. The nest loves us. We love the nest. Wouldn't you like to be in the nest, too!

    1. Re:This is why we only use products from the nest by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I've heard the nest is infected with worms!

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  2. They read one Tom Clancy novel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And then they lose all sense of proportion.

    1. Re:They read one Tom Clancy novel by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      And then they lose all sense of proportion.

      At least the game isn't in Denver....

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:They read one Tom Clancy novel by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      And then they lose all sense of proportion.

      At least the game isn't in Denver....

      Goodbye California from Alistair McLean is an interesting read if the game is in SFO...

    3. Re:They read one Tom Clancy novel by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      At least they're reading Tom Clancy novels now. As opposed to being surprised by some obviousish things:

      1. Debt of Honor - 747's could be turned into weapons, and flown into government buildings in DC
      2. Executive Orders - Removing the Iraqi government leaves a power vacuum that Iran and others want to move into, sparking a civil war.
      3. The Bear and the Dragon - China's economy is super-fragile, and when it starts cracking the government will do anything to prevent it.
      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:They read one Tom Clancy novel by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      That's something at least. The game's not in San Francisco. We don't even have a football team or stadium anymore, after all.

      That doesn't stop us form absorbing more than out share of the BS and headaches. And even worse, those nitwits in City Hall let the city get fleeced by the NFL. Santa Clara, at least, got it written into their contract that the NFL has to pay for all of their expenses. Ed Lee didn't bother to insist on a similar clause for San Francisco, so we're on the hook for all of the costs. At this point, I really hope it does pour down rain on the day of the game and that the black lives matter crowd really does manage to follow through on their promise to shut down "Superbowl City".

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  3. It's not TSA-level security theater by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Interesting
    But it's pretty close. Look. The venue for this and the next several Superbowls is announced years in advance... plenty of time for any number of threats to be prepared and installed outside the watchful eyes on the stadium (and the surrounding area) right before the big game.

    Given the popularity of the sport and this game, it has to have occurred to those with a bone to pick versus the Americans what a powerful blow this would be.

    The big question is, "Have the anti-UAV defenses been employed?"

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      installed where? this is why the government descends on the location weeks before the event to sanitize it and uncover anyone hiding anything close to it. unless you can hide a hydrogen bomb a few miles away and build it powerful enough to destroy the city and hide the radiation for all this time, then you deserve to be top terrorist

    2. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's pretty close. Look. The venue for this and the next several Superbowls is announced years in advance... plenty of time for any number of threats to be prepared and installed outside the watchful eyes on the stadium (and the surrounding area) right before the big game.

      Especially if any of them have ever watched "The Dark Knight Rises".

    3. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't want them to have to "employ" any defenses. To employ the UAV defenses means the deployed defenses are utilized to destroy or damage a threatening UAV sufficient to disrupt it's ability to successfully attack.

    4. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weeks before means that you have time to distribute thousands of 3.5 oz. bottles around the town!

    5. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Given the popularity of the sport and this game, it has to have occurred to those with a bone to pick versus the Americans what a powerful blow this would be."

      In this world there is religion, fundamentalist religion, and the Super Bowl. Perhaps the only reason why such an attack has not taken place is that everyone knows it would result in the immediate erasure of the Middle East. All of it.

    6. Re: It's not TSA-level security theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Something, something, something, terrorists, something....

      The only thing I see is massive amounts of public money being wasted on security for a for-profit event. Most of it isn't even security--it's just a chance for a bunch of agencies to attempt to remain relevant by engaging in scare tactics on a grand scale.

      What an utter waste of money and resources. I'd say the resources could be put to better use, but where DHS is involved I'd rather see no use at all.

    7. Re: It's not TSA-level security theater by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, you ACs are probably all just trying to convince us to let our guard down. Die you nazi swine!

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    8. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless some Sovereign Citizen wants to get some attention about taking his country back.

      Oh, yeah, ain't terrorism if a Christian does it.

      Don't make me post links, you should already know that more people have been killed in the US since 9/11 by right wing nut jobs than by Islamic terrorism.

    9. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by erp_consultant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, it occurs to me that if some radical group really wanted to cause havoc at the Super Bowl they could. But they won't and it's not because of the security theater. It's because if such a thing were to occur the outrage would be so great that our politicians would be forced to act upon it. Every plane, every ship, every gun would be pointed squarely at those responsible and in a matter of days we could wipe them from the face of the earth.

      Instead they engage in attacks that are much smaller in scale. Their objective is not to kill everyone. Their objective is to strike fear into everyone. And these smaller scale attacks are very successful at that. Not only that, it gives politicians cover by allowing them to claim that these are "isolated incidents" and not large scale attacks. Such is the nature of guerrilla warfare.

    10. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Don't worry--even if a christian does it, we'll make up a link.

    11. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Yes. Good comment. I want that to be true, too.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    12. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if they were Americans, we could just start blowing up cities they might live in!

    13. Re:It's not TSA-level security theater by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      In this world there is religion, fundamentalist religion, and the Super Bowl. Perhaps the only reason why such an attack has not taken place is that everyone knows it would result in the immediate erasure of the Middle East. All of it.

      Are you a Football fan? If religious nuts attacked sporting nuts, my reaction would be similar those soccer riots in the UK. Team A hates Team B and something bad happened, who cares, they're all idiots.
      Really, sport is fun to watch sometimes, but the people who treat it like fundamentalist religion deserve the same fate...

  4. They slipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Previous year's Superbowl security measures have included WMD sensors, database-backed facial recognition, and gamma-ray vehicle scanners."

    All that and still they couldn't stop Janet Jackson's nipple.

    1. Re:They slipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Previous year's Superbowl security measures have included WMD sensors, database-backed facial recognition, and gamma-ray vehicle scanners."

      All that and still they couldn't stop Janet Jackson's nipple.

      They planned that so everyone would look at the camera.

    2. Re:They slipped by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      That's because they didn't have database-backed nipple recognition.

  5. That's DEPLOYED idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that is why you terrorists always lose.

    1. Re: That's DEPLOYED idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the UAV defense is a lazy high school dropout with a broom handle, it can also be employed and not just deployed.

    2. Re: That's DEPLOYED idiot! by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      Perhaps the UAV threat is itself a ploy,

      and they'll hit you low while you're looking up?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re: That's DEPLOYED idiot! by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      actually here in CA there are UAV's that patrol routinely on the highways. The stadium is like 45 or 50 miles away from the city so they can fly over no problem if they want

  6. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be just a swell treat if Timothy turns out to be the only editor that they kept, having let all the others go in the wake of the acquisition?

    From the last-spoiled-banana-on-the-shelf dept.

  7. Mossad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Keep an eye out for those pesky Mossad agents posing as Arabs and staging false flag attacks.

  8. hired audience fixed race wmd on credit expo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how exciting

  9. Re:Sheesh by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Timothy has been busy this weekend. All the other editors on holiday?

    He's training his Chinese replacement.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be just a swell treat if Timothy turns out to be the only editor that they kept, having let all the others go in the wake of the acquisition?

    From the last-spoiled-banana-on-the-shelf dept.

    Maybe the new owners feel sorry for him?

  11. London Olympics had missiles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well at least its not as bad as the London Olympics, where a civil servant named Charles Farr decided that anti-aircraft missiles would be installed on the tops of houses. As if anyone would shoot down a plane over London in case a hijacked plane came crashing down over London! It was pure "be afraid" theater.

    When you get these security shows, they're usually trying to push some legislation at the same time.

    For the Summer Olympics of 2012 was happening, Theresa May was trying to push through Snoopers Charter again. (14th June 2012 she announced another attempt to make it law, the Olympics were a month later in July 2012):

    http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/jun/14/snoopers-charte-proposal-tory-row

    Guess who was behind the Snoopers Charter law? One civil servant named "Charles Farr"! The very same one behind the missiles on houses! Such coincidence!

    He was also behind it in 2009, when Parliament rejected Snoopers Charter, and he decided he would go ahead anyway and ordered GCHQ to start spying (their "Mastering the Internet" program) under a false interpretation of an old telecoms law from 1984.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/03/gchq_mti/

    Charles Farr, read it an weep for democracy in the UK:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Farr

    "He has been responsible for the Prevent anti-terrorism strategy, the Interception Modernisation Programme under Labour and the current Communications Capabilities Development Programme, both being projects to enable to the government to surveil the traffic data of ordinary Internet communications of UK citizens.[2] The programme has resulted in the draft Communications Data Bill 2012.[3] During the 2012 Summer Olympics in London, Farr was in charge of security, he was behind the siting of missiles on the roofs of residential buildings in East London.[3]"

    1. Re:London Olympics had missiles! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      As if anyone would shoot down a plane over London in case a hijacked plane came crashing down over London!

      Indeed. That's why it was forbidden on pain of court-martial for the RAF to shoot at Boche Heinkels in WW2.

      Oh, hang on. It wasn't and you're full of shit.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  12. Re:Sheesh by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Timothy has been busy this weekend. All the other editors on holiday?

    He's training his Chinese replacement.

    Heh!

    Thank goodness for that. If they'd been Indian, BIZx would likely be a Disney shell.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  13. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timmy's a bot.

  14. A hundred million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is that the best you guys in the US of A can do? Wake me up when you get the several hundred million that we get in a football world cup - football as in the real thing, not that silly rugby wannabee that you guys concocted.

    1. Re:A hundred million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah laugh all you want. this is only counting 1 country.

    2. Re:A hundred million? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wake me up when you get the several hundred million that we get in a football world cup - football as in the real thing

      You mean soccer?

      I've tried watching it...and BOOOORING.

      Just back and forth, hardly any scoring, no serious risk of someone getting a concussion or something broken....

      And for the life of me, how the fuck do they figure the time and when a game is over?

      I tried watching that last go around where the US did fairly well in it...game was about to be over and...

      OH wait...for no explainable reason, we're gonna add another 12 minutes to the game...

      I think they did this twice in one of the last games and the US ended up losing.

      I"m thinking Ok, if they can just make up the rules as they go....this isn't really much of a game.

      Besides...a "real" game of football has something like "Sudden Death".....not just holding up a pretty colored card at someone...

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:A hundred million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no fan of soccer, either, but this page explains the various reasons why the refs add time: http://www.socceramerica.com/article/40985/how-refs-add-time-during-games.html

    4. Re:A hundred million? by trawg · · Score: 1

      I've tried watching it...and BOOOORING.

      Just back and forth, hardly any scoring, no serious risk of someone getting a concussion or something broken....

      Yeh the back and forth of soccer is pretty boring - except when compared against the 11 minutes of actual gameplay in your typical three hour American football match.

    5. Re:A hundred million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is that insightful when your dreadful POS game literally has 15 minutes of play in 3 fucking hours?

      You want boredom? It's Gridiron. And dont get me started on you poofters with pads. REAL handegg doesn't use helmets. And STFU abut OH STRATEGY!!!! because I know thats bullshit. Rugby Union has more strategy and they manage to do that while keeping the game moving.

      Fuck Gridiron and fuck the drooling retards that think it's in any way watchable.

    6. Re:A hundred million? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I tried watching that last go around where the US did fairly well in it...game was about to be over and...OH wait...for no explainable reason, we're gonna add another 12 minutes to the game...

      Actually, as an American football fan, I have to admit I think it's pretty entertaining.

      In football, you have a visible clock. They stop it for out-of-bounds, incomplete passes, penalties, etc. When it gets down to zero? Game over.
      In soccer, the refs keep track of how much time is spent on things like corner kicks, throw-ins, penalty kicks, and the like. So when the clock hits zero, that's when they announce how much time was spent.

      It adds an entertaining element to the game--you have little idea how much extra time you're going to have (I'm sure the teams have someone who keeps track and guesses, but the typical fan won't). So it ain't over until it's over.

      Besides...a "real" game of football has something like "Sudden Death"....

      Actually, during the regular season, the NFL allows ties. They play one overtime period and if nobody scores (or they both score back-to-back field goals), it's a tie. There's been three of them in the last five years. In the playoffs, I believe they just keep doing overtime until both teams have touched the ball and somebody scores.

      Soccer has ties in the regular season, I believe, but championship games play a couple of overtime matches and then shootouts until somebody wins.

      I agree that I prefer watching American football, but soccer is pretty fun to watch as well.

    7. Re:A hundred million? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's in the US constitution: all foreigners count as 1/10th of a person.

  15. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by bws111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The population of the US is 318 million, which,last I looked, was far greater than the 100 million expected viewers of the Super Bowl. Also, the World Series, which happens in October, is baseball, and the Super Bowl, which happens in February, is American football. So, if you are not a troll, you are an idiot.

  16. And in 2 years by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    And just think in 2 years I will have to deal with this stupid shit. It was bad enough since where I went to college was also a training camp for a team and I would be taking summer classes when it was going on. I almost ran over stupid professional athletes several times because they don't know their head from their ass and would just walk or run out into the road without looking. A super bowl is going to be orders of magnitude worse.

    --
    Time to offend someone
    1. Re:And in 2 years by Major+Blud · · Score: 2

      would just walk or run out into the road without looking

      They are just trying to stay on top of their game. What better way to practice dodging and flynching? If you can avoid a car, you should be able to avoid a linebacker :-)

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    2. Re:And in 2 years by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      So you are saying I should have been using the hood ornament on my POS oldsmobile as an aiming device? Maybe if I had the team wouldn't have sucked.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  17. Gamma-ray vehicle scanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So they're searching people's cars in a way which could potentially knock DNA around and cause cancer?

    1. Re:Gamma-ray vehicle scanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we safe from the Terrorists.
      Also, breaking the law, unreasonable search (to most, obvious not those in power.)

    2. Re:Gamma-ray vehicle scanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse: "Hulk smash!"

  18. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not as bothered by the surveillance due to the fact that people can just opt out by not going / purchasing tickets, and it's a completely entertainment event. However, the gamma-ray scanners are troubling because cancer is a larger cost on society, and if these things cause an uptick, that's a delayed cost in potentially millions of dollars (hundreds of thousands minimum per affected individual).

  19. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody outside the US has ever heard of the Superbowl, so how can there be more viewers than US citizens (many of which don't care enough to watch anyway) ? And no, it's not a troll. If you want to world series to live up to their name, maybe, just maybe, you should invite other countries, no ?

    LOL...he's clearly from one of those puny EU countries, and doesn't realize there are some countries that need more than 8 digits for their population. It's really gonna blow his mind when he learns about china/india.

  20. Re: 100 million ? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, in reality, population of the US is slightly over 320 million.

  21. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by desdinova+216 · · Score: 2

    there's a third option, both

  22. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    I was expecting the usual humorless America-bashing in this thread. Congratulations! You managed to show everyone how much you hate, while contributing nothing to the discussion. Well done!

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  23. Gamma Rays!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By using gamma rays to prevent an attack, they will create the very monster they were looking to prevent! HULK SMASH!

  24. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be great. I'd love to watch Odell Beckham Jr. catch a ball over the middle over the *Honduran* defensive back.

  25. Translation... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    If you thought traffic was bad in Silicon Valley, it's going to get worse for the next ten days.

    1. Re:Translation... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It seems absurd to me. The game is just a few hours on Sunday. So who cares about all the stuff happening during the week?

    2. Re:Translation... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So who cares about all the stuff happening during the week?

      A lot of private and commercial aircraft will be flying in before and after the game. Not all those planes will be parking at San Jose International airport. The early birds will park locally. Everyone else will have to haul ass over the mountains from outlying regional airports.

      http://www.insidebayarea.com/business/ci_29446013/bay-area-airports-brace-an-onslaught-commercial-private

  26. This is all for show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And anyone with a brain knows none of it would stop a determined bad guy.

    However it is good practice for keeping law abiding citizens under control. And that's what is really going
    on here.

    It's a training ground for suppressing civil unrest.

    1. Re:This is all for show by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      I'm sure that the radioactive material sensors can detect some percentage of people who try to make a dirty bomb. Maybe most of them. I don't really understand all technical issues, but I have no problem with that.

      Bad guys are not binary: determined/uninformed. They have a skillset. 100% security is impossible. You'll never stop someone from stealing your life savings if they really want to and have skills and equipment. But you still would put it in a safe.

      Which doesn't mean all these measures are good ideas. But I categorically reject "none of these matter" as categorically as I reject "all of these matter".

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  27. planet 'Murika by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why they don't do like baseball and declare our national championship the World Championship.
    Err hell, just go right to Championship of the Universe. It's not like anybody else bothers to play the game.

    queue up Hollywood treatment where the best of the NFL have to stave of an alien invasion by beating them at American Football. Unfortunately, Bert Reynolds is probably unavailable.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:planet 'Murika by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, to be fair, it's called "World Series" because it used to be sponsored by a newspaper called "News of the World", or something like that.

    2. Re:planet 'Murika by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1
  28. No thanks by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    Welcome to the land of the free. /s

    1. Re:No thanks by HiThere · · Score: 2

      You inserted an extra "r" into that last word.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  29. While examining potential security threats... by Erbo · · Score: 2

    ...they'd better not forget the Goodyear blimp.

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  30. The nest has gamma radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience with nuclear power plants, gamma radiation is pretty much the worst as far as cancer-inducing electromagnetic radiation goes. Just terrible.

    1. Re:The nest has gamma radiation by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Gama rays are like everything else (lasers, microwaves, sunlight, water, etc), only really bad if you get too much of them. At the level these scanners work at they are completely safe.. - - A minute statistical danger, that is in reality totally irrelevant.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  31. Or a false flag by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "Goooo Team Police State!!"

  32. I'm personally affected by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2

    I ride my bicycle to work and pass the stadium daily. I ride past it on a bike path that goes along a creek. They have already shut down my bike path and several streets, and according to the newspaper things won't begin to reopen for nearly 2 weeks.

    It was impressive to see the enormous structures they're building around the stadium for one game. They brought in the same cranes they use to build skyscrapers to erect the most massive shade structure I've ever seen.

    I'm amazed at how much money is being spent for this game. It is offensive that they feel entitled to shut down roads and trails for weeks for a frickin game.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:I'm personally affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that SF gets the bill for a game held in Santa Clara.

    2. Re:I'm personally affected by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Humanity? its more important than that, its sport. (YAWN!) You have my sympathy..

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    3. Re:I'm personally affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is offensive that they feel entitled to shut down roads and trails for weeks for a frickin game.

      Your right to travel is protected primarily by the 9th Amendment.

      But the US legal profession is in a position of ethical conflict of interest with respect to recognizing the authority of the 9th Amendment. A lot of the practice of law, and a lot of the work opportunities for lawyers, both historically and today, depend on the public not understanding the implications of the 9th Amendment.

      Hence, the right to travel gets routinely violated. The ethical lawyers know perfectly well that this, like a lot of the things done by government, violate the Bill of Rights. There aren't enough ethical lawyers, so almost nobody speaks out when the government is doing something illegal.

      It's no different then when the government shuts down the roads during a storm, whether or not you have any legitimate business being out on them, whether or not you have an appropriate vehicle, and so forth. If you have an elderly relative and they die because you aren't allowed to check on them (and the police are too busy to do so), that's just too bad.

      In the land of the free and the home of the brave, Big Brother controls a surprising number of things that interfere with reasonable exercise of individual freedom.

      Welcome to the new fascist reality.

      If this bothers you, do something about it.

    4. Re:I'm personally affected by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      you should see the city - luckily we work 1 block outside the "superbowl city" that has like 3 city blocks blocked off with craptons of security everywhere. Just glad I don't catch the ferry in because the building has security in and out where you get sent back if you have a nailclipper.

    5. Re:I'm personally affected by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      no it doesn't, the 9th amendment just states that not all rights are enumerated in the constitution. Essentially it allows for the challenge to laws, it doesn't grant rights. If I were to say - slap around a minor - it isn't protected by the 9th amendment even though it isn't enumerated or outlined that minors are subject to all rights in the constitution as they are under guardianship (so damage would be taken up in a civil court). You can say the same with driving your car in a public park, or any number of laws that are violations of state or civil code but not enumerated in the constitution.

  33. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    If you want to world series to live up to their name, maybe, just maybe, you should invite other countries, no ?

    Like Canada?

  34. Health danger of the gamma-ray cargo scanners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any?
    From the bit I remember of physics the higher the frequency of the beaming the more energy it contains, gamma-ray have a higher chance to ionize tissues than x-rays so it's probbaly very dangerous to be scanned by one of these.
    Which makes me wonder about the legality of these measures.

  35. Re:Sheesh by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    He's probably the cheapest.

  36. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by HiThere · · Score: 1

    If the population of the US is 318 million, and most of the people I know won't be watching the SuperBowl, how much should I believe their 100 million estimate?

    For that matter, how could they know even afterwards? I can imagine some way to track the number of TVs that were tuned in, but most of those don't have built-in spy devices yet.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  37. Tension in SF by DigitalAce9 · · Score: 1

    My family and I went into the city to see some of the Super Bowl 50 festivities going on and couldn't miss the overabundance of security. Even when we walked away from Moscone Center toward Union Square, about a mile away from the main festivities on the Embarcadero, there was a very visible presence of police officers paired up on the street corners -- quite unusual for San Francisco. It wasn't their presence alone that was strange, but they all seemed abnormally intense... even nervous. My son walked up to a pair of officers holding vigil on one of the street corners and asked them why they were there, so far from the main Super Bowl City "fan village", and one tersely replied: "We don't want another Paris." Yikes. My kids, all three teenagers, didn't miss the bluntness of the remark. It kinda cooled the mood on our evening out. The kids became a little quiet and I caught myself keeping an eye on the people around us. Signs and Wonders...

  38. How much is surveillance costing the taxpayers? by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 1

    And why isn't the NFL picking up the tab? Same with any large sporting event. Owners need to start contributing instead of taking a free ride.

  39. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by adolf · · Score: 1

    Nielson is still a thing, you know.

    And I guess I kind of assumed that cable boxes and satellite receivers phoned home statistical data.

  40. Be prepaired by sjames · · Score: 2

    All of that hoopla and theater and nobody thought to bring a NIST certified air gauge?

  41. drones armed with nuclear weapons.. by lucien86 · · Score: 1

    They set up a 18 km (11 mile) radius no fly zone for drones (and aircraft). Maybe worried about attack by drones armed with nuclear weapons. (been waiting to make that joke since read about it a week ago.. :) )

    --
    Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  42. Re:100 million ? Yeah right. by HiThere · · Score: 1

    That's number of TVs, not number of viewers. And I've always been quite dubious about Nielson.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  43. I am pretty worried by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

    I am pretty worried about terrorist activity happening here in SF with the superbowl and all, I mean it is only 45 miles and a couple of counties away from san francisco.......