Microsoft's 'Replacement' Surface Pro Charger Cable Is an Off-Brand, and Short (theinquirer.net)
Carly Page writes with a story from The Inquirer, where: As part of its Surface Pro charger recall, Microsoft has chosen to replace the sleek, shapely matt[e] plastic original with a cable approximately half the length and ordered from an off-brand manufacturer, in our case China's I-Sheng Electric Wire and Cable Company. Writer Peter Gothard points out a plausible reason for the length, though: "The extraordinarily short length of the cord is presumably to discourage behaviour that resulted in the "tightly wrapped" or "repeatedly bent" cables catching fire in at least 56 separate incidents."
It's cheaper than providing a high-quality cable which isn't as affected by wrapping, or providing a built in wrapping mechanism, or some other inventive technical fix.
It's not like this is for some super-premium flagship device that they're...oh, whoops.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
All lies. And this is a lie too.
For the few of you that actually bothered to click on the article link, the picture shows some kind of really short cord with a plug at the end...
I don't know what the hell that is but it cannot be the cord the article is about, because the cord MS is sending is just the cord that goes between the power brick and Surface Pro, so it doesn't have a plug.
Also worth noting that the article summary might lad you to believe this was about the current Surface Pro, but it's not - Surface Pro 3 and older. Even then it does not apply to a Surface Pro 3 you'd buy new from Microsoft now, they ship with fixed cables already. It doesn't affect the Surface Pro 4 at all.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
It'd be nice if customers would figure this out. They're supposed to be kept flat and straight, or left in the packaging they shipped in. jeez.
The AC cable for the Surface Pro series is two pieces like most laptop cables. There's a simple AC cable without ground that goes from the wall to the transformer block, and then the transformer has a fixed DC wire that goes to the tablet itself.
This recall *only* affected the AC cable, and that cable was already pretty short (like two feet tops). The bulk of the cable length comes from the DC cable itself, and that did not shorten (because it wasn't replaced). Don't get me wrong, the DC cable has issues and needs a reinforced boot, but we're talking of a total cable length loss of maybe six inches.
"Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
Not sure if it is because I'm in the US, but my replacement cable for my Surface Pro 3 is pretty much identical to my original cable, same looks and the same length.
http://i.imgur.com/SWYoudk.jpg
For the few of you that actually bothered to click on the article link, the picture shows some kind of really short cord with a plug at the end...
I don't know what the hell that is but it cannot be the cord the article is about, because the cord MS is sending is just the cord that goes between the power brick and Surface Pro, so it doesn't have a plug.
Also worth noting that the article summary might lad you to believe this was about the current Surface Pro, but it's not - Surface Pro 3 and older. Even then it does not apply to a Surface Pro 3 you'd buy new from Microsoft now, they ship with fixed cables already. It doesn't affect the Surface Pro 4 at all.
?? the cord that goes from the Sp3 to the brick is permanently attached. That can only be replaced by swapping out the brick itself. The *other* cord is the one being replaced, as shown in the pic.
Intersting, that goes against what the article was saying and what other link I read said.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
This is the actual image of the cord being replaced by Microsoft.
... but it didn't have that awful UK plug on the end, either.
and UK has weird 50 cps power at double the sensible voltage. You have to go cheap when you have cheap power to handle.
Your article also goes against what has been common use for a decade-plus.
Every portable computer I've had comes with wall-cord-brick-cord-portable device charging scheme. Desktops still follow this convention once you decouple the idea of internal vs external.
Only my phones have wallwart-cord-device charging.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
Hmmm ... You're holding it wrong?
Sorry, but people wind cables, it's a use case. This sounds like a bit of bullshit to me.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Seriously, this is what is considered news around here? A company sends out a free replacement power cord that prevents fires, and people bitch about the fact that it isn't four miles long and encrusted with diamonds? I got mine, swapped it, thought "one less thing to burn my house down" and moved on with life. I urge you all to do the same.
At least they didn't link to Forbes again, so they've got that going for them, which is nice.
Only my phones have wallwart-cord-device charging.
Sorry, wrong!
Although this 65W Apple Wall-wart charger (yes, that's an ad for a generic rip-off, but it has the best pictures) for my 2013 MacBook Pro comes with a cable that snaps in, in place of the built-in plug (which also has retractable "blades"), it does indeed function in "Wall-wart" configuration, too.
And yes, it's nice to have the flexibility. At home, I can just plug it into the power strip on my desk, but sometimes it is nice to have the extra 6 ft. of cord that the AC cable provides. Yes, I could just pack an extension cord; but it is nice that Apple's engineers were thinking of the user, and also providing an easy way to "localize" the same adapter (which operates from 100 - 240V AC also) both in Wall-wart and "brick" modes.
Oh, as you can see from the above pics, the Adapter also has little flip-up "horns" that form a cord-winder for the captive output cable (which also has a built-in cable-clip).
Complain all you want about Apple being a "fashion accessory" company; but these little features are all about usability, not "fashion".
Interesting, SuperKendall spouted off about some shit he knew nothing about and got caught, yet again.
> I don't know what the hell that is but it cannot be the cord the article is about, because the cord MS is sending is just the cord that goes between the power brick and Surface Pro, so it doesn't have a plug.
Probably a stock photo. I bet if we use Google Images to search for it, we'd find it in some stock collection.
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
"Sorry, wrong!"
Apparently your dumb ass forgot to read the *MY* part.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
"Sorry, wrong!"
Apparently your dumb ass forgot to read the *MY* part.
No I didn't. But apparently YOUR dumb ass forgot to parse the sentence correctly. The subject of your sentence was "phones", not "my". Meaning that only "phones" had Wall-wart chargers.
I was saying that my LAPTOP had a Wall-wart charger.
My replacement cable is the same length as the original. I ordered a European replacement for an Australian original.
My partner's replacement cable is also the same length as the original. She ordered an Australian replacement for an Australian original. That was we have both basis covered.
I don't give a crap what brand the cable is. It looks fine, well built, has stress relief in the proper places, and if it doesn't burn my house down then that's a bonus. It also comes with proper markings, certifications and material traceability and quite frankly is better built than some other cables I have lying around the house.
But don't let that get in the way of a Microsoft bashing session.
What exactly is an on-brand power to converter cable manufacturer?
Microsoft is poop.
Profit has overwhelmed common sense.
For xmas I got a bluetooth speaker. Like it quite a bit, except the damned USB cable it came with is 18" long. Which makes it a serious pain to charge, I can either put it on the floor to charge, or charge it in the kitchen or bathroom. Why don't I just buy another USB cable, you ask? Because the damned thing is a different sized micro USB connector. Neither my PS3 cable nor my phone cable will fit. So I don't know that I can buy a longer cable.
Which brings up the question, Why are all crockpot power cords so damned short?
SP2 owner here.
When I got my recall notice (via Amazon, where I bought it), my first thought was "good thing I don't keep mine plugged in all the time" (it sees very light usage, and the battery holds up nicely for weeks on end while powered down)
Then I clicked on the actual notice and was puzzled for a bit. The charger pictured in the notice didn't look anything like the one that came with my Surface. Mine was a compact wall wart with folding prongs. More searching led me to a listing for a Surface 24-watt charger that looked just like the one packed with my SP2, and taking another look at the logo on mine, it says "Surface RT". I'd been using the thing on-and-off for almost a year and never noticed. Turns out the RT and Pro could use each other's chargers.
Anyone else get an RT charger bundled with their Surface Pro 2 or 3?
---PCJ
The site that posted the picture is based in London. Maybe this is true in UK and not the US.
We've received several replacements here at work and they look almost exactly the same as the original just a reinforced double jacket on the end that goes into the power brick.