Slashdot Mirror
Unprecedented Spike In TOR .Onion Nodes (profwoodward.org)
Martin S. writes: The Tor project is reporting an unprecedented rise in unique .Onion nodes, rising from around 40k to 60k in just a few days, says security researcher Professor Woodward. I wonder is this could possible be related to Shari Steel plan to push Tor mainstream, as reported on /. a few days ago.
More FBI nodes to more easily de-anonymize the network.
It's probably Lizard Squad again. This is their MO.
Control enough entry and exit points, you stand a good chance of capturing enough traffic to de-anonymize the TOR user.
Of course, I have no clue what I'm talking about so feel free to tell me why I'm wrong.
Cheers
I didn't realize my botnet of compromised tor nodes would be noticed this quickly.
Maybe people are wising up to the fact they are under attack from their government?
The number of hidden services (.onion sites) has increased, not the number of exit or relay nodes.
Personally, I don't see 20k more hidden services as a big number: I'm surprised there are so few total (60k). Tor hidden services are a great way to run a server with a dynamic IP address and solve NAT and fire wall issues all at once for free when trying to run a personal server. It also solves several other problems people generally care less about (hides your IP to prevent traffic DDOS attacks, and protects your identity), provides an easy mechanism to have multiple servers serving the same address for redundancy, provide end to end encryption (if the client is also using tor) and makes your service more accessible to clients using TOR (they don't have to go through an exit node).
Tor hidden services are great for low-bandwidth latency tolerant random services you might want to serve off your laptop or phone from time to time. I found it easier to setup most alternatives for solving any one of these issues: I set up a tor hidden service on the first try with no issues. It was easier than getting my dynamic DNS working, and also easier than forwarding a port through my router. (You can host a tor hidden service without port forwarding since all the connections the server makes are actually outward to the poxy nodes).
Really I think the only big issue with them is the latency, and lack of IPv6 support. On that note, I recently had an IPv4 outage for a while and it was interesting to see what worked on IPv6 only.
Tor: 'Mystery' spike in hidden addresses
There's a recent spike in encryption trojans, too. The recovery-keys are provided through TOR.
e.g.
http://1.f.ix.de/scale/geometry/695/q75/imgs/18/1/7/5/3/8/0/5/locky-desktop-9dc10fc8250d6db0.png
Looks like its generating specific servers to get the keys from for every victim.
Hell, is that encrypted or something? Please, please, a little more attention to the headlines
. . . that they sold and delivered a 20K server to the NSA . . .
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
According to TFA (yes, I know, I am not supposed to read it) this could be caused by the anonymous messaging application Ricochet which apparently creates a hidden service for each user.
Would have expected that that information was mentioned in the summary.
Space or illegals. Would space aliens be illegal? Undocumented? How would TRUMP 2016 handle that? I know, build a space wall, of course, but how to make somebody else pay for it, that is the only real question. Do you hear that aliens?
This reads more of an ad for Ricochet than anything substantial.
ricochet.im is responsible.
"I wonder is this could possible be related"
Good to see whipslash is maintaining Slashdot's proud and longstanding traditional of editorial illiteracy.
That's because somehow cyber criminals broke Windows 10 and started doing one one of the following: or This shit network now is running in a new version of .Net framework, or they managed to install the previous versions on many computers. The number of needed nodes to make something big has fallen.
Ah, please don't try to undo what I spent all night fixing. And when I say fixing I mean getting rid of this unscrupulous fucking ugly stalker.
https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Ab...
This is probably the safest way to use Tor.
Is there a risk to having too many hidden services? My understanding is that the address and key needed to unlock the data are related, so if there are more hidden services, then the chances of a collision or key harvesting is dramatically increased. Plus, there is no way of "owning" an .onion address, so could there be two of the same one at the same time?
Makes me wonder if they need to increase the address space or do something to fix those problems.
Government spying nodes.
Only if the community is also allowed to wiki-edit AC comments.
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
Lol.
Onions, I2Ps, onioncat, Phantom, and IPv6 are PRECISELY what people are using to share all their media overbittorrent with complete ANONYMITY and thus total IMPUNITY.
Trusting VPN's to not log or be ordered to rat you out is completely ass retarded foolish.
You NEED to use these anonymous overlay networks to protect yourself.
You get all your data encrypted in transit to your peers so no one else can see it, and you get total inability for any peer to know your real address.
You can rip and share CD's, DVD's, Games, BluRay all you want with nobody able to stop or say shit or sue you.
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year.
A true filesharing haven finally exists :)
Some people have been testing nodes and creating hundreds of them at a time. I don't recall why they were doing this, but it could be others are doing the same thing.
I wouldn't trust most .onion services anyway. If you're not up to date with The TBB and/or Tails, and/or you don't harden your Tor setup by disabling javascript and other methods, you just might get owned and may not notice it.
99% of the .onion sites I've visited appeared to be honeypots. Once you've learned the warning signs to look for, it all becomes clear.
"I wonder is this could possible be related to Shari Steel ..."
The grammar in this sentence made my eyes water.