Slashdot Mirror


In Brazil, Police Overstep Court Order To Sieze Former President's Email

New submitter MythicalMan writes: During the search and seizure in the Lula Institute last Friday, [Brazil's] Federal Police threatened a computer technician with being taken under arrest, forcing him to give the administrator password of all email accounts @institutolula.org (hosted at Google). Such generic access was not granted by the court's mandate, which referred only to a few specific email accounts. See the information here (in Portuguese). The fact is worrying not only because of its illegality but also for its possible international repercussions, since Lula Institute corresponds with institutions, public figures and heads of state all around the world. Investigations of corruption in Brazil have been characterized by frequent leaks to the press and to opposition politicians who use them to attack the government of President Dilma Rousseff. The methods used by Brazilian prosecutors have been questioned not only by government supporters, but also by jurists, scholars and journalists.

158 comments

  1. Zika! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yikes?

  2. Re: "Seize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    FORA DILMA! LULA NA CADEIA!

  3. Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to seize evidence of criminal wrongdoing?

    1. Re:Why is it an overstep by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      I know that failure to read TFA is a thing, but you could at least read the summary where it says "generic access was not granted by the court's mandate, which referred only to a few specific email accounts."

    2. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      In the U.S. it's called "due process of law".

      The constitutional guarantee of due process of law, found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels of government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property.

      http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Due+Process+of+Law

    3. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait wut? that still applies here? i had no idea.

    4. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Brazil, not the US.

    5. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the U.S. it's called "due process of law".

      Woooo, I'm impressed by your democracy. The US is heading straight to the abyss, and you people pick my country to speak ill of.

      Just so you know, I trust our imperfect democracy more than yours. We are a great people destined to a bright future.

      See what we can do on next Sunday. Millions of people will be on the on the streets, fighting for justice and responsible governance. What will you be doing the same day? On the couch eating popcorn and giant amounts of Coca-cola, watching Trump eat your country by the fringes?

      News flash: The world order is not what you think it is anymore. We'll hold the torch of freedom, as the US descend into fascism. But we will help you out, don't worry [and go wash your mouth].

    6. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      This is Brazil, not the US.

      That's why I prefaced my comment with "In the U.S." However, the principle of due process of law should be a universal concept.

    7. Re:Why is it an overstep by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Dear too coward to show your name,

      How exactly will Brazil hold the torch of freedom when its police can't follow a simple court order? When half the elected officers are pushing for an illegal impeachment so they can stop an investigation that threatens them? Where pretty most every media outlet wages a non-stop PR war against a single party so that their chosen ones (the ones always involved but never mentioned) stand a chance to win the next presidential elections?

      Give me a break. Speaking ill of your country?

    8. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seize would be fine, but they siezed it.

    9. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      On the couch eating popcorn and giant amounts of Coca-cola, watching Trump eat your country by the fringes?

      Donald Trump doesn't have the numbers to win the election, especially if he's getting less than 50% of the Republican votes. Something that Karl Rove pointed out in an Wall Street Journal op-ed this morning.

      http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-polls-trump-hasnt-won-1457566355

    10. Re:Why is it an overstep by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "We are a great people destined to a bright future."

      Yea, not when your own people can't be bothered to stand up to the blatant corruption.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you could warn them.... if only you spoke hovitos!

    12. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Wishing does not make it so.

    13. Re:Why is it an overstep by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Depends on how "due process" works.
      I.E What kind of information is seized and stored? What unspoken things do warrants grant?

    14. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy for you and your country and I hope more happens to bring things about but...

      Trump hasn't done a damn thing yet. He probably won't even get the chance to. Your arrogance and ignorance in this matter is just as bad as the Americans who snap at him for being a racist even tho not a single cite can be given of anything racist that he's ever said. If you want to focus on how the US is going down the tubes focus on what it is today and who's been leading it, not who may lead it in another 10 months.

      Too many of the same Americans you spoke down to in your post think the same thing as you. They're already blaming a guy who hasn't had a single second in office for the problems we face today and the trends that underlie them as a terrible harbinger of the future.

      It seems the media has played all of you chumps for the stooges that you are. You're probably being played by your own government but don't see it yet.

      disclaimer: I do not belong to the Republican or Democratic party of the USA. I will not be voting for anyone they put up as candidate in the next election.

    15. Re:Why is it an overstep by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What Brazil shows is that, despite having a size, population, and massive natural resources comparable to the US, politics and corruption vastly dominate the progress of a country, or lack thereof.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    16. Re:Why is it an overstep by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      ...to seize evidence of criminal wrongdoing?

      FYI: no wrongdoing investigated: he only got to be on testify on an investigated case (the "wrongdoing" was created by traditional media FUD...)

    17. Re:Why is it an overstep by morcego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is Brazil, not the US.

      You are correct. Instead of "Due Process of Law", it is called "Devido Processo Legal", specifically stated in the 1988 Constitution, article 5, LIV, among others.
      If you want, I can cite specific articles from the process law (Código de Processo Penal) that are also applicable.

      --
      morcego
    18. Re:Why is it an overstep by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      See what we can do on next Sunday.

      it's consequence of an irresponsible an Brazillian traditional media media FUD...

      * dear [brazilian, a think...] AC: you know that you are only spreading FUD, right?

    19. Re:Why is it an overstep by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      I second this post (and I'm a Brazilian)

    20. Re: Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hope and change

    21. Re: Why is it an overstep by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Nice attempt at a strawman (just kidding, it sucked); would it be safe to assume you're withthe Brazilian Federal Police? :)

    22. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the U.S. it's called "due process of law".

      The constitutional guarantee of due process of law, found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels of government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property.

      http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Due+Process+of+Law

      Shove your golden due process of law up your ass. Lula has been hiding evidence, lying through his teeth with plenty of evidence that he can't hide against his ridiculous claims, moving compromising documents to secret places, and otherwise doing everything he can to obstruct the law. What the fuck does he have to hide? Only fools can still harbor any hope that he is innocent of anything. There are videos on YouTube of him bragging and mocking about how he has pulled off dirty tricks on national and international entities by lying shamelessly. The guy is a filthy criminal and heads an alleged "labor party" that has been using "social" demagogic rhetoric to rob an entire country blind. Brazil has never been is worse shape. He and his sons have amassed a level of personal wealth that none of their legitimate activities could even remotely possibly justify. Judge Moro is some kind of Elliot Ness who is doing the unthinkable in this country, which is going against the powerful and cleaning up some of the perennial mess.

    23. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Lula has been hiding evidence, lying through his teeth with plenty of evidence that he can't hide against his ridiculous claims, moving compromising documents to secret places, and otherwise doing everything he can to obstruct the law.

      In the United States, he would be entitled to fair trial. No matter how corrupt someone appears to the public at large, you can't deny him a fair trail and turn him over to a blood-thirsty mob. As I pointed out to another commenter, people who fight corruption are often corrupted themselves once they get into power. Why? Because they're too busy shoving the process of law where it doesn't shine.

    24. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear too coward to show your name,

      How exactly will Brazil hold the torch of freedom when its police can't follow a simple court order? When half the elected officers are pushing for an illegal impeachment so they can stop an investigation that threatens them? Where pretty most every media outlet wages a non-stop PR war against a single party so that their chosen ones (the ones always involved but never mentioned) stand a chance to win the next presidential elections?

      Give me a break. Speaking ill of your country?

      Hogwash. The impeachment is not illegal, and here is an interesting fact about it: the three jurists actually responsible for writing it up and submitting it (among dozens of other submissions that have been rejected for not being good enough), including Mr. Bicudo who used to be a member of the Labor Party and left it out of utter disappointment, are NEVER, EVER mentioned in the public discussion fostered by supporters of the party. Instead, supporters ALWAYS divert attention to Cunha, the man who has the power to accept or reject the submission and has, of course, a lot of things to hide like any politician. Everybody including the Labor Party knows that the impeachment is legit, but will do everything they can to shoot it down. Besides, the Labor Party filed impeachment against EVERY SINGLE president that has ever been in office since the reinstallation of democracy in 1984 under far less justifiable claims until it finally put their beloved leader in office. That party stinks.

    25. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...to seize evidence of criminal wrongdoing?

      FYI: no wrongdoing investigated: he only got to be on testify on an investigated case (the "wrongdoing" was created by traditional media FUD...)

      Bullshit. Almost all of the media is in the government's pocket. The Labor Party has been buying everyone they can, with taxpayer's money, of course. Someone living in Brazil will see almost zero true opposition outside of the social networks (mostly Facebook), where the people, not the corrupt media, has the power to speak and share information.

      Rede Globo, the most popular TV channel in the country by any standards, very unusually (wait for this...) SHUT THE BLINDS of the window right behind their newscast anchormen which overlooked a bridge where protests against Lula, Dilma and the Labor Party were taking place with a bug balloon of Lula dressed as a prison inmate at the time of the newscast! They fucking shut their blinds to very relevant news that was going on right under their nose!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8S3JSkMlcA What kind of FUD-laden opposition media does that?!!

    26. Re:Why is it an overstep by hagnat · · Score: 1

      i for one would love to see due process being followed
      but when the people being investigated are the one who control the due process, and you are dealing with stuff that is so fragile as digital data, due process becomes a luxury which you shouldn't expect to last

      --
      "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
    27. Re:Why is it an overstep by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      The problem is that, while votes will go non-Trump as people drop out of the race, it's too little, too late. Hillary Clinton will be the next president. If either Cruz or Rubio would just accept a VP role and drop out, Trump would already be gone. Back on subject, with my wife being from Brazil, from what I hear, stuff like this is par for course, and their tax system is almost as convoluted and ridiculous as ours.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    28. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistics prove Trump can't win.. but yet he IS winning. His numbers are better than _ANY_ of the Republicans he is running against. I think you need to stop and consider what you spout before you spout, because you look like a fucking idiot parroting what the elite's pay establishment media to peddle to the masses. Oh, I know.. "Go Romney", right you twat?

    29. Re:Why is it an overstep by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Dear AC,

      I (and no one else, I think...) can't take your arguing seriously, since you are not brave enough to identify yourself - all I can do is warn others that you are trying to spread FUD...

      sincerely yours

    30. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * dear [brazilian, a think...] AC: you know that you are only spreading FUD, right?

      Yeah, a Liberal [the Chicago kind] Brazilian [not to confuse with Communist, please]. I speaking of the truth, Braga. I hope the streets of Rio Claro get as full of People as the Paulista avenue. Liberal cheers [and HAUS DILMA!]

    31. Re:Why is it an overstep by Coren22 · · Score: 0

      I would like to add to all that, Hillary would be far worse. The only reason she isn't already answering for her crimes committed on her personal email server is because she has a D next to her name, just like the current president. Anyone rooting for Hillary should really look at Brazil and consider what a criminal in the presidency could do to our country.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    32. Re:Why is it an overstep by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Dear [new?] AC,

      Again, a must say you are spreading FUD (if not, why the fear by posting as AC, in this case?)

      * if you, at least, lived here (and see the "facts" that the press/media build, everyday), your opinion can have some relevance [but, it's not the case, non-Brazilian AC...]

    33. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      His numbers are better than _ANY_ of the Republicans he is running against.

      He's getting 35% to 45% of the votes per primary election, which means approximately two-thirds to one-half of Republican voters didn't vote for him. The question becomes will they vote for him as the nominee, if he gets the nomination since he won't have enough delegates to declare an outright victory. Republican voters are notorious for staying him on election day if their favorite candidate doesn't get the nomination. If a large portion of Republican voters stay home, the White House and the Senate will go Democratic.

      I think you need to stop and consider what you spout before you spout, because you look like a fucking idiot [...]

      This is Slashdot. You must be new around here.

      "Go Romney", right you twat?

      With the 2016 electoral map identical to the 2012 electoral map, Trump will have to do better than Romney. Since Trump already pissed off the minority and independent voters he needs to win the general election, he has to win 70% of the white male vote (see link below). Reagan and Bush I got 67%, Bush II and Romney won 63%, and no Republican has ever won 70%. In short, he's screwed the Republican Party.

      http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-needs-7-of-10-white-guys-213699

    34. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical PT partisan: I present easily verifiable facts, but he is only interested in my identity.

    35. Re:Why is it an overstep by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      easily verifiable facts

      which one?

      * posting as AC makes you can't receive notifications on reply, making any kind of dialogue difficult :/ (besides that, how can I assume was the same AC that made the posts?)

    36. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Anyone rooting for Hillary should really look at Brazil and consider what a criminal in the presidency could do to our country.

      George W. and the Great Recession was a good example that. None of the Wall Street bankers went to prison for cratering the economy. The only person who got charged was a Russian programmer who took home modifications he made to open source software that Goldman Sach claimed were proprietary.

      http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2013/09/michael-lewis-goldman-sachs-programmer

    37. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... No matter how corrupt someone appears to the public at large, you can't deny him a fair trail and turn him over to a blood-thirsty mob.

      Well, you could always label him as an Enemy Combatant and ship him off to Guantanamo...

    38. Re:Why is it an overstep by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      George W. and the Great Recession was a good example that

      You mean the great recession caused by a deregulation that Bill Clinton signed into law?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Funny how Bill Clinton's mistake cratered our economy once, but his wife would make a GREAT president :)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    39. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He will get a fair trial. He hasn't even been charged yet, and you're talking about fair trials... he's doing everything he can to obstruct the investigations.

      Make no mistake, the opposition is corrupt as well. But what does that have to do with the cleptocrats that have held power for the past 12 years? The opposition is not doing the investigation. Actually, the Minister of Justice, the hierarchical supperior of the Federal Police, who are the ones doing the investigation, is appointed by the President herself.

      It should be seen as a good sign that the Federal Police has managed to get this far.

    40. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You mean the great recession caused by a deregulation that Bill Clinton signed into law?

      I do blame Bill Clinton for repealing the Glass-Steagall Act, and for the Dot Com Bust that came after he left office. But the Great Recession happened during George W.'s time in office.

    41. Re:Why is it an overstep by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      But, the Glass-Steagall act legalized the behavior which caused the Great Recession. But, the Great Recession occurred after Bush's time in office, so you could blame Obama with the same reasoning you are using to blame Bush, so I guess I should ask why you feel the Bush caused the Recession?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    42. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I guess I should ask why you feel the Bush caused the Recession?

      George W. should have replaced Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan. Low interest rates inflated the real estate and debt bubbles while Greenspan looked away, ignored the danger signals from the economy and resisted reforms to regulate the markets.

    43. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      But, the Great Recession occurred after Bush's time in office [...]

      The Great Recession ended five months into Obama's first term in June 2009, when his administration was still getting started and supporting George W.'s policies. The Great Recession got started in 2007, not on January 20, 2009 as some people believe.

      [...] so you could blame Obama with the same reasoning you are using to blame Bush [...]

      I give Obama credit for a seven-year-old Wall Street bull market.

      http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2016/03/09/the-bull-market-is-seven-years-old-why-arent-people-more-excited/

    44. Re:Why is it an overstep by Pow.R+Toc.H · · Score: 1

      Exactly. As a Brazilian, Paulista and Paulistano I also second this.

      I find strange that: 1) corruption in Brazil, for these people, has just begun on January 1st, 2003 (when PT started their government) and 2) the corrupt people only are on PT and not on PSDB/DEM/name your right-wing party. Meanwhile, here on Sao Paulo state (where the same political group holds the power since 1982), we got massive corruption schemas that were never investigated: the Alston train affair, the irresponsible water management of Sao Paulo's metro area (look for "draught" and "Cantareira") and, last but not least, the case of school meals ("merenda") affair, where the food for the classmates has been sent everywhere but state schools. Mind you, the food that should had been sent to schools has been found at a deposit on a barbecue restaurant of Jundiaí (a city ~50 km from Sao Paulo).

      Moreover, the opponent of the right-wing coalition which lost the presidential elections in 2014 has also been denounced on the very same operation that is targeting Lula nowadays not less than 5 times by 5 different people, and absolutely nothing has been done against him. He has also his share of scandals to be investigated - for example, an airport built besides his farm with state money - but the media just does not give a fsck about it. Dilma's government is mediocre at best, but Aecio and his party (PSDB) have been very keen on putting out the fire with gasoline.

      --

      --------
      Fighting the herd since 1985.
    45. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * if you, at least, lived here (and see the "facts" that the press/media build, everyday), your opinion can have some relevance [but, it's not the case, non-Brazilian AC...]

      Haha, such a fool... I live far nearer to you than you think. ;)

      God bless your heart [I love Rio Claro, in spite of commies like you]

    46. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, AC, for the adjectives "fool" and "commie" - if you understands Portuguese, I suggest the video: https://youtu.be/RhXSnkW630g

    47. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the only one lying here, dude.

    48. Re:Why is it an overstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, regarding Glass-Steagall. You are so wrong that you are Not Even Wrong.

      Glass-Steagall was passed in 1933 and was repealed in 1999. It addressed systematic abuses that caused the Great Depression, an event dramatically larger than the 2007 recession. The Great Depression is to the 2007 recession as an 18-wheel freight truck is to a Yugo.

      Point being, it is not reasonable to link Glass-Steagall to the 2007 recession except perhaps by it's absence. And if you do that you cannot claim it "legalized the behavior" that caused said recession.

    49. Re:Why is it an overstep by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

      I do blame Bill Clinton for (...) the Dot Com Bust that came after he left office.

      That was because Al Gore, inventor of the Information Superhighway, left with him. No wonder it blew up!

      *ducks*

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    50. Re:Why is it an overstep by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      (sorry by posting AC: the slashdot mobile site is not very user friendly :P)

    51. Re:Why is it an overstep by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      You know that there's two cities named "Rio Claro", in Brazil, right? One in São Paulo state and other in Rio de Janeiro state (confusing, huh?)

    52. Re:Why is it an overstep by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So, your assertion is that the recession is not still ongoing? You do realize that incomes have been flat for like 10 years, and there are still many people out of work. Wall street making money does not end the pain for the rest of the country.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    53. Re:Why is it an overstep by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So, your assertion is that the recession is not still ongoing?

      The recession has been over since June 2009. The consequences of the recession is still being worked today and will be felt for the next 20 years. And then reality will set in when people realizes that retired baby boomers outnumbers working people, Social Security and Medicare will consume two-thirds of the federal budget, and taxes will have to go up-up-up to pay for everything else. Politicians been kicking this can down the road since Ronald Reagan became president.

      You do realize that incomes have been flat for like 10 years [...]

      You do realize that inflation is below normal levels? Wage growth follows inflation.

      [...] and there are still many people out of work later this year.

      According to the employment numbers, the slack is disappearing as employers hire more people but the unemployment number stays consistent at 4.9%. If this trend continues, inflation should normalize at 2% and wage growth spike upward.

      Wall street making money does not end the pain for the rest of the country.

      I love Wall Street. The stockbrokers look at the global economy, worry about the US entering another recession and send the market into a dizzy. Meanwhile, I'm buying up shares in my favorite dividend-paying stocks with solid fundamentals at historically low prices.

  4. Something something omelettes eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dirty Harry would murder a hundred innocent bystanders to get that punk who thought he could get away. And people would applaud him.

    1. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Dirty Harry would murder a hundred innocent bystanders to get that punk who thought he could get away.

      Dirty Harry stretched what was permissible for a police detective to do under the law but he would have never murdered bystanders to get at one punk.

    2. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Dirty Harry stretched what was permissible for a police detective to do under the law but he would have never murdered bystanders to get at one punk.

      Well, yes and no. There are scenes in Dirty Harry and Magnum Force where Harry shoots into a crowd of people "to get at one punk". It almost makes the scenes somewhat humorous. Of course, as long as he has 100% confidence in his aim, and belief that his bullets won't penetrate and hit a bystander, I guess it's OK, but it's not exactly ideal police procedure. But then, we're discussing a fictional character.

      I'm especially thinking of one scene where some black guys (of course) are robbing a restaurant and Harry pulls his hand cannon and starts blowing away bad guys while civilians are running all around.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      There are scenes in Dirty Harry and Magnum Force where Harry shoots into a crowd of people "to get at one punk".

      How many bystanders were "murdered" as the OP wrote? Dirty Harry had a reputation for recklessness. Murdering bystanders would have run him out of the department.

      But then, we're discussing a fictional character.

      Real life is stranger than fiction.

      All nine people wounded during a dramatic confrontation between police and a gunman outside the Empire State Building were struck by bullets fired by the two officers, police said Saturday, citing ballistics evidence.

      http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/08/25/nypd-shooting-bystander-victims-hit-by-police-gunfire.html

    4. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You do realize its a movie, right? Not real life?

      Movie physics != Real Physics

      In movies, people with gun shot wounds to the abdomen die in seconds or minutes instead of hours or days too ... but you don't care about that, eh?

      You know aliens can't actually defy gravity like in independence day right?

      I mean I could go on for days point out how movies don't actually represent reality, but its pretty silly of me to do so when the argument here is that a dude in a movie MIGHT have missed or the bullet MIGHT have went through the target to strike someone else and that makes him a murder ... even though we clearly see int he movie that no such thing happened.

      So since we're just making up bullshit about fictional events, I'm the POTUS so step off bitch.

      ITS A FUCKING MOVIE.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      gun shot wounds to the abdomen die in seconds or minutes instead of hours or days

      Well not all movies .

      That said too many people seem to believe that getting shot is instant death and that you go flying backwards when shot. Having shot a number of deer (thankfully all clean good shots) and also helped track down a few of my cousin's (he unfortunately has gut shot a couple), I have see deer run for miles for the better part of a day, as well as get shot through the heart, then hear the shot, run, and then tip over dead after 10-20 meters. I haven't ever dropped one but both my uncle and cousin have, but in those cases we were hunting in southern Minnesota with 12 gauge slug guns.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    6. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You do realize its a movie, right?

      Well, of course. I even said as much ("But then, we're discussing a fictional character.")

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      All nine people wounded during a dramatic confrontation between police and a gunman outside the Empire State Building were struck by bullets fired by the two officers, police said Saturday, citing ballistics evidence.

      I'll bet both of those cops had seen Dirty Harry.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'll bet both of those cops had seen Dirty Harry.

      Nah, "The Guantlet," where the house gets shot to pieces.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ht4PfYkJjoc

    9. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I have respect for someone who knows his Clint Eastwood movies.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know aliens can't actually defy gravity like in independence day right?

      To be honest I cannot think of a part of independence day where the aliens are actually defying gravity. But, how do you know that aliens cannot defy gravity? Do you know any aliens?

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

      Arthur C Clarke

    11. Re:Something something omelettes eggs by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I can defy gravity. It doesn't do me any good, since gravity wins anyway, but I can defy it. "Do your worst, Gravity!" as the pen drops to the desk surface.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. banana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This country is, after all, a a banana republic, what else can anyone else expect ?

  6. Re:"Seize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word is spelt "seize", mmkay?

    And 'spelt' is a type of grain.

    But back on topic, this is Brazil we're talking about. Legality is the last thing the Police are concerned with.

  7. biased article by hagnat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article, written and hosted by instituto lula itself, should be taken with a grain of salt The institute is already under investigation because of massive cases corruption.
    Also, someone leaked that the police would be seizing the institute, and they emptied it from most of its documents. Its like watergate in here, and the judge presiding the investigation has a lot of popular support because he is finally going for people which seemed to be untouchable in the past.

    --
    "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
    1. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You should know that you should never, under any circumstances believe in the Brazilian media and the institute publish for yourself is the only possible way to pass the censorship of their native media (censorship is applied by publishers, not by the government). Only fools really believe in their "Rede Globo", is worse than Fox News.

    2. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Corruption around the ex-president figure is so rampant that "due process of law" itself is a barrier to the due process, unfortunately.

      As a citizen I can only approve what the police is doing.

    3. Re:biased article by morcego · · Score: 1

      Then said citizen, besides being a coward that won't name himself, is also a moron.
      Giving the state arbitrary powers is much more damaging than any politician can do in his lifetime.

      You should now stop watching "Cidade Alerta" and such "quality" program on TV and maybe read a little bit on WHY we have due process of law and constitutional guarantees, because you put your foot deeper inside your mouth.

      --
      morcego
    4. Re:biased article by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      The institute is already under investigation because of massive cases corruption.

      many tell that all cases were created by the press (but it must be investigated anyway thought...)

    5. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morcego, I see you clearly identified yourself; therefore you are not a coward. Good for you, so when your beloved party sank in in the sea of shit they are swimming now you can go to the streets showing your face and indignation.

      Like other bats flying around, you will be mostly ignored.

    6. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I approve the police obtaining all the proof and evidence they need to put Lula and corrupt friends behind bars.

      If you understood anything different, you are clearly and idiot. Or a PT party partisan... or most probably both.

    7. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's speculated that in an desperation move Lula may even be invited to the Dilma government in order to obtain immunity.

    8. Re:biased article by bigpat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The article, written and hosted by instituto lula itself, should be taken with a grain of salt The institute is already under investigation because of massive cases corruption.
      Also, someone leaked that the police would be seizing the institute, and they emptied it from most of its documents. Its like watergate in here, and the judge presiding the investigation has a lot of popular support because he is finally going for people which seemed to be untouchable in the past.

      Yes, this sounds like the police were worried that the sys admin was going to delete the server or something so they just demanded the admin passwords. Sure that would give them access to all the accounts, but it seems reasonable if there was a reasonable fear that the admin wasn't going to comply with the order. Yes the police should only look at the accounts that the courts ordered them to.

      Now it looks like Slashdot has been used to spin coverage towards some false privacy debate when this is about corruption.

    9. Re:biased article by hagnat · · Score: 1

      if it were only Rede Globo broadcasting it, i might give you some reason to doubt that. But there isn't a single news outlet that is covering this situation in the same way. So, yeah...

      --
      "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
    10. Re:biased article by nazsco · · Score: 1

      had you marked as a friend for some reason, but changed to foe :)

      pointing out that the article is form the offended party is one thing, but ignoring that they are right about the law is another.

      then, the funny thing is, @hagnat compares this to watergate, but the current president is the one how put the laws that enabled the corruption to be prosecuted in the first place. So it is kinda the opposite of watergate.

    11. Re:biased article by hagnat · · Score: 1

      the law exists for a long long time already, its not something Dilma created
      and she is also going to be investigated on accusations that she tried to disrupt the investigations

      and i am not arguing if due process was followed or not
      i am questioning whatever is written on instuto lula's article, cuz it might be full of lies created to discredit the investigation
      the institute also critized how Lula was brought to justice to be interrogated, but it failed to highlight the fact the he was asked to come to justice several times before and he kept presenting excuses not to

      --
      "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
    12. Re:biased article by hagnat · · Score: 1

      friend or foe ? i didn't even knew about that system before you mentioned it
      i wonder what i did in the past for you to mark me as friend, given that my participation on /. is rather low

      thanks anyway :)
      and hope that you move me back to the friend side of the table in the future ;)

      --
      "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
    13. Re:biased article by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Do you approve of them overstepping their bounds? What if your email account was one of the unrelated email accounts the police gained access to over and above what they were authorized to see?

      If you don't care about this, I challenge you to publish the entire contents of your email account as you don't see anything wrong with it.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    14. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is indeed a biased article.

    15. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC is not being investigated for laundering tens of millions of dollars.

    16. Re:biased article by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, so why should the police have access to his email account along with the email accounts in the court order?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And like a good 'free thnker' , I'm going to withold judgement until more information is available.

      Until then I'm going to look at the what ifs...
      - Is it reasonable that, that law enforcement in Brazil would threaten a Sysadmin with jail for not cooperating, exceeding legal authority? Seeing the issues Brazil has had recently, 'you betcha'!

      Point is, it's a clustefuck in Brazil right now. At least on these matters. Doesn't mean I'm leaning one side or the other...

    18. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, you are VERY naive... You know nothing about the Brazilian media my friend :-) They ALL are "tea-party style", Globo is only the worst.

    19. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get what you are implying, stop that already.

      What I don't get is why you pretend that you don't understand that, given court order leakages, "overstepping their bounds" was simply the only way to get intact evidence. We can only imagine the amount of evidence that was already destroyed due to internal leaking.

      Besides, I would happily give up my privacy if it meant doing my country the huge favor of getting hid of big time corrupt politicians.

    20. Re:biased article by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Writing as AC for having used modpoints. The guy you answered does not know that in Brazil all the media is right-wing and so the only way for an individual or entity to publish some information without being censored or distorted is publishing herself on the Internet.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    21. Re:biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy you answered does not know that in Brazil all the media is right-wing and so the only way for an individual or entity to publish some information without being censored or distorted is publishing herself on the Internet.

      Bullshit. The media in Brazil is populist. It's conservative when it thinks the audience is going to approve its conservative stance on whatever is being presented, and it's leftist when it thinks the audience would rather have a more "power-to-the-people" approach to it. Because the media knows that the general public doesn't give a hoot about political labels. People just want to feel good about themselves and look good before God (Brazil is a very Christian/Catholic country). The media in Brazil aims to be in good standing with the general public as often as possible.

    22. Re:biased article by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      You really, really know shit about the brazilian media.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  8. hosted at Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sensitive political e-mail was hosted at Google? Smart. It's like an open invitation to DoJ etc. to just read what they need, remove what they want, and insert what they need to try to dictate the outcome.

    1. Re:hosted at Google by rbanffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. It was not sensitive government e-mails. Instituto Lula is an NGO.

    2. Re:hosted at Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh... Wikileaks is an NGO too, I think?

  9. biased source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Such generic access was not granted by the court's mandate, which referred only to a few specific email accounts. See the information here (in Portuguese).

    It's important to note that the source is from Instituto Lula itself, which is the one being investigated.

    There are legal procedures which the institute itself make take if it believes it was illegal,
    but it seems that they limited themselves merely to blog that. Why?

    1. Re:biased source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn about the country before suggesting courses of action. In Brazil justice does not work, and especially not work if it is to protect the rights of a of worker's party. And they can not publish to other means than their website because the entire country's media would make Fox News blush, there is no means of communication that is at least neutral in the country. So, the only means of communication is the Internet... As long as is still uncensored by the judges.

  10. Look at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Look at the source cited by this post, it's their own website. Lula and his institute are known for trying to manipulate public opinion in every possible way, but I not even for a second thought they would end up spreading their s*** on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Look at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lula is being defended by left-wingers in his Workers Party. Slashdot has a lot of left-wingers here.

    2. Re:Look at the source by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      there's also links for http://www.bbc.com/news/world-... and http://news.yahoo.com/brazil-p... in the TFA: the way you speaks appears is an Instituto Lula PR only...

    3. Re:Look at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the source cited by this post, it's their own website. Lula and his institute are known for trying to manipulate public opinion in every possible way, but I not even for a second thought they would end up spreading their s*** on Slashdot.

      It it now well known that the ruling party has bought an army of internet soldiers to spread propaganda and fend off all criticism. Traditionally, parties only buy big shots, but this one innovated by spreading part of their budget really thin among a very large number of people who will be more than glad to spread propaganda for a modest pay. Corruption is so deeply ingrained in this country anyway, what do they (think they not) have to lose?

  11. TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    TFS puts a negative spin on the government's efforts investigate Brazil's broad corruption scandal, but the TFA's show overwhelming support by the Brazilian public and court systems:

    "Many Brazilians believe that our existing legal system is poorly equipped to handle such massive illegality that is larger than the justice system itself," he said.

    Crucially, Moro's [presiding Judge over the case] tactics have won the backing of higher courts in dealing with Brazil's biggest ever corruption scandal, in which a cartel of builders overcharged Petrobras for contracts, paying bribes to company directors and kickbacks to politicians.

    Prosecutors have struck more than a dozen plea bargain deals and none of them have been denied by the Supreme Court, which has to approve testimony before it can be accepted as evidence.

    This is such a huge corruption scandal that's gone on over a decade, Brazil is going to have to be very aggressive to clean the rot out of the system. Stories about "overreach" are coming from wealthy criminals who have hired reputation management/PR flacks feeding stories to gullible/corrupt journalists.

    1. Re:TFS spin by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Stories about "overreach" are coming from wealthy criminals who have hired reputation management/PR flacks feeding stories to gullible/corrupt journalists.

      You don't consider "overreach" by the police as a form of corruption? For example, police in some jurisdictions of the U.S. seize assets under the drug laws because it's easier to raise money that way than ask taxpayers for a property tax increase.

    2. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are no allegations of overreach except by the corrupt officials that are being investigated. The public overwhelmingly support the investigations, the courts are on board with it, lot of plea deals and sentencing have already occurred to build a case against Lula.

    3. Re:TFS spin by rbanffy · · Score: 0, Troll

      This corruption scandal has been going on for more than two decades, perhaps 3. Funny thing that only a single party (that ranks as the third one most mentioned in this investigation) is being dragged through the mud. It's notable the former presidential candidate that leads the largest opposition party (if you don't count the opposing half of the largest government coalition party) has been named no less than five times by different witnesses and yet has been spared from the media spotlights. And, mind you, Aécio's party is the #1 in terms of candidates that can no longer run for office due to the "Ficha Limpa" law and their corruption charges.

      This is not justice. This is a circus.

    4. Re:TFS spin by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The public overwhelmingly support the investigations, the courts are on board with it, lot of plea deals and sentencing have already occurred to build a case against Lula.

      That may be the case. But the public, police and courts have an obligation to ensure that there is no overreach is being committed. Just because the unpopular target of the investigation is crying foul doesn't mean that the accusations are entirely baseless.

    5. Re:TFS spin by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 1

      This is such a huge corruption scandal that's gone on over a decade, Brazil is going to have to be very aggressive to clean the rot out of the system. Stories about "overreach" are coming from wealthy criminals who have hired reputation management/PR flacks feeding stories to gullible/corrupt journalists.

      Be careful what you wish for. The same tools used in a "war" against corruption could in the future be used against less famous and less wealthy people whose main crime would be merely their failure to follow the rules of an overly complex legal system. I'm all for hounding mass murderers and dictators down to their retirement homes. But if it's a matter of finding out simply whether the money was properly recorded in some ledger, which is the only proof you're likely to get in a corruption case short of a smoking gun video, then I think it's better to focus on just a few big cases, the ones where the prosecution is most likely to win a conviction, and then fix the laws that allowed such corruption to flourish.

    6. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, getting mired in a debate over the potential legal boundary of ONE court order, and using that one issue to call into the doubt the legitimacy of the the entire corruption investigation is specious at best. Its the kind of "integrity of the process" argument that anti-democracy cretins use to subvert justice.

    7. Re:TFS spin by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Its the kind of "integrity of the process" argument that anti-democracy cretins use to subvert justice.

      "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss." — The Who

    8. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is justice because finally current government allies corrupt politicians are being arrested. Circus would be the exact opposite of that.

      Some clowns will get their rightly deserved jail time and Lula is definitely showing to be one of those clowns... time will tell.

    9. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you have just described it EXACTLY what the Brazilian authorities are doing. Except that this is not just about some "money (being) properly recorded in some ledger", this is about active corruption involving hundreds of millions of dollars. It's the biggest corruption scandal in the entirety of brazilian history.

      captcha: bloody

    10. Re:TFS spin by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      This is not justice. This is a circus.

      I second that!

    11. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A cynical paen to the corrupt, established order if there ever was one. BTW, argumentation by song lyric against the pursuit of justice against rich criminals is lame, especially if the writer of the lyric has a net worth of $105 million.

    12. Re:TFS spin by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      A cynical paen to the corrupt, established order if there ever was one.

      People who fight corruption are often corrupted themselves once they get into power. For example, Imelda Marcos and son are trying to reclaim the presidency in the Philippines after a generation of the "People Power" revolution petered out into corruption.

      http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2013/08/corruption-philippines

      [...] the writer of the lyric has a net worth of $105 million.

      In short, anyone who is rich because of their hard work must be corrupt.

    13. Re:TFS spin by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Totally different mentality between them and you or I. It makes me think it's a social construct. It's more widely seen in areas where they don't (at least nominally) quite have the same level of protections afforded by their constitution and/or are acclimated to living in an area where corruption is more wide-scale.

      The behavior/belief or expression is similar to what you see from the Americans who say things like, "If you've nothing to hide, you've nothing to worry about. I'm glad that they're doing this to keep us safe." It's not exactly the same but it is similar. I guess it's not really unexpected when you are in a country where you're regularly stopped on the street and asked to produce documentation, pay a bribe, or things like that nature - and from people who are the authorities.

      I've not spent any real time in Brazil but I've been in South America quite a bit and it's not uncommon to have authorities with road-blocks and asking for documentation. I don't know how corrupt Brazil is - I've only been once and that was strictly tourist stuff for a festival. I've never gotten out and about beyond tourist areas, the hotel, the beach, and things like that. I can speak more about Mexico, Peru, and Chile and maybe a bit about Argentina as I've spent more time in those countries. Corruption is wide-spread and pretty open - and accepted.

      So, I guess it's not really unexpected or surprising for them to say something like that and to think like that. They're used to the police being corrupt and overstepping their boundaries. This is rather trivial compared to them shaking down a local businessman or chasing the gay, homeless, or trans people out of the sewers with gasoline and a match - and then shooting them as they escape.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >People who fight corruption are often corrupted themselves once they get into power.

      No they aren't.

      >In short, anyone who is rich because of their hard work must be corrupt.

      Strawman.

      Would any non-rich person write a cynical song critical of revolution and social change if they weren't a member of one of the richest megabands in the '70's? (It's as vapid a song as the Beatle's "All you need is love"). Would any non-rich person be able to claim they were "just doing research" when caught paying for child porn and doing no jail time?

    15. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you have just described it EXACTLY what the Brazilian authorities are doing. Except that this is not just about some "money (being) properly recorded in some ledger", this is about active corruption involving hundreds of millions of dollars. It's the biggest corruption scandal in the entirety of brazilian history.

      captcha: bloody

      You are almost correct. Make that billions, not just hundreds of millions to be really accurate.

    16. Re:TFS spin by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      No they aren't.

      That's exactly how they become corrupted because they don't think it can happen to them.

      Strawman.

      I love how you divide the world between the non-rich and the rich.

    17. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is about active corruption involving hundreds of millions of dollars. It's the biggest corruption scandal in the entirety of brazilian history.

      It pales in comparison with the much larger Zelotes scandal, which is in the billions, not mere millions. But since all the media and big companies are in that one it's ignored. And that's a good thing. If all companies that are to blame were investigated it would do even more needless damage to the economy.

    18. Re:TFS spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is rather trivial compared to them shaking down a local businessman or chasing the gay, homeless, or trans people out of the sewers with gasoline and a match - and then shooting them as they escape.

      You really don't know [at least] Brazil. I find it amazing how intelligent people can display such ignorance in these pages.

      Brazil is the Gay Mecca. The Trans paradise. The women's kingdom. The minorities territory [universal health care, minimum income programs, etc]. The white man's hell. Understand?

  12. It's not like Brazilian Police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would do anything against the law, right?

  13. Re:"Seize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the siezure warning.

  14. Re:Who cares about Brazil? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure Slashdot is a US site. From where did you get that EU thing?

  15. account self-destruct password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enter password:

    HelpThereIsAGunToMyHead

    Your account has been encrypted and the password changed to a random password, and it cannot be unlocked pending confirmation of your safety or a legal court order. No password can unlock your account. The local police in your area have been alerted. Good luck.

  16. Massive bribery, embezzlement claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all misdirection from an institute that exists solely to make legal to the biggest companies in Brazil to donate millions upon millions of dollars to the corrupt leaders of Brazil to gain favors like big contracts in the case of construction companies and an crazy monetary policy in the case to give the banks here the best profit that any bank in the world can only dream.
    Until now the president Dilma Rousseff and former president Lula da Silva are not directly indicted by the federal police. But lots of their friends, including the owners, directors and heads of international construction companies like Odebrecht are already in jail.
    Marcelo Odebrecht, that donated millions to the Lula Institute are already in jail. He is a personal friend of Lula and his company wins lots of the biggest government contracts to make buildings for the Fifa World Cup and for the Olympics Games that are going to happen at 05 of August in Brazil. Marcelo is one of the richest man in Brazil with a fortune of more than 3.5 billion dollars. Marcelo Odebrecht company also made freeways in USA and in lots of other countries.
    Alexandrino Alencar, Odebrecht C-Level figure, used to travel together with Lula many times, Alexandrino is also in jail.
    Lula is the most populist person imaginable. Banks and huge construction companies gained an unprecedented level of profit in his two mandates and in the (already) second mandate of Dilma that is from his party. At the same time lots of people think he is the poor guy that is going to face the capitalist corporations in favor of the poor. They see him like a modern Robin Wood. Lots of people even want to die for this former president.
    Anyway, the great majority of the population, now, are seeing that this populist steal tons of money from the tax that the people of Brazil pay for his personal gains and to maintain himself and his party in the power. Talking about tax, Brazil is one of the countries with the most expensive cellphones, cars, gas, computers, televisions, etc.. in the world because of the extreme tax rates that we pay.
    The educational system here in Brazil is completely broken, you can search about that with google and you are going to see that schools here are creating an army of illiterates.
    I and lots of friends that voted for Lula in the past, believed that he is truly a guy that cares for the well being of Brazilians.. we are very.. very wrong. This guy and Dilma Rousseff are destroying this country together with a legion of corrupt politicians that infest the government of Brazil.

  17. I disagreee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I live in Brazil and I know that what the police wasn't 100% right. BUT, unfortunately our laws are very flawed and the system is full of bureaucracy that can delay by a long time or make the actions not come to be. In this fight against corruption in Brazil, I think the police in some circunstancies should bypass the law to obtain a greater good. I'm just tired of our politicians taking a lot of our monthly income with high taxes and giving little/nothing back.

  18. Theory being reality... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This topic has been discussed on the (former) TrueCrypt forums a lot.

    For hard disks and such, a "self destruct" password would be useless. Any forensic person would be running stuff against an image of the HDD, and a "self destruct" code will mean a re-ask of the password after liberal application of a rubber hose or some high voltage electrical device to various parts of the body.

    For people demanding access to remote accounts, a duress password (something that allows access, then shuts down access, locking the user out) is VERY useful... but there is no support for it, either by AD or any other directory system. I have heard stories that some countries will demand people authenticate to their company's sites as a matter of course by border/customs. In previous jobs, it was policy for a remote admin to have their AD admin rights pulled, or if the company was smart, the admin account was locked, so the user had full access to their user's stuff, but not much else, just in case.

    The best defense against this is VeraCrypt. Get asked to open a disk, they can have at it. Even better is PhonebookFS, but that project seems to have been abandoned. The nice thing about PhonebookFS is that one can have different layers, and with randomly generated chaff, there is no way to tell how many layers are present.

  19. It's news to me, coming from traditional media... by fbobraga · · Score: 2

    and I'm Brazilian - the traditional media here seems to hide facts from the public, treating manipulation of the "common opinion" as a business model...

    * Brazilian media is better described as an oligopoly : the National Constitution explicit forbids crossed property of TV, radio and newspaper (as common in other markets, ie, FCC make something like it in US...), but the media owners ignore that to the point it is a joke nowadays :/

  20. Give me a break! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on PT, even on Slashdot? Lula is clearly guilty of a dozen crimes (to be judged), he is the chief, the head, the capo. Please accept the facts and stop making him look like a victim of political prosecution - his party rules the country for 13 years now.

  21. hogwash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This summary is full of misinformation, and it's very biased. MythicalMan's previous submissions show how slanted he is about Brazilian politics.

    The allegations of illegality mentioned in the summary are backed up by a link to the Instituto Lula's website itself, hardly a neutral, trustworthy party.

    As to the Yahoo article, it has been grossly summarized, and also contains errors itself. There has been no detention without charges, only detentions before trial, as some of the accused have tried to leave the country and nearly all of them have the means to do so. Lula, for instance, wasn't put under arrest, he had refused the previous two requests to provide testimony, so they got a court order authorizing his forced deposition. He still had the constitutional right to remain silent, and was free to go after providing his testimony.

    Why on earth is this kind of partisan crap being published on Slashdot?

    1. Re:hogwash by MythicalMan · · Score: 1

      Dear Anonymous Coward,

      My only political comment in the past here at /. was a report about the reaction in Brazil against Rede Globo. Globo is kowingly a long-time supporter of authoritarianism and corruption. They even attempted to apologize for supporting the dictatorship that ousted President João Goulatr, in 1964. Brazil has a so terrible media landscape that Reporters Without Borders called it “the country of 30 Berlusconis”. The fact that Globo and Brazilian media are attempting to oust President Dilma Rouseff and prevent Lula from running for president in 2018 is blatantly clear. The irony in this story is that while Lula is being accused of hiding property the Marinho family, owners of Globo attempts to conceal the luxury house that they illegally built in a natural preserve in Paraty, state of Rio de Janeiro.

      --
      --- Signature? You must be kidding!
    2. Re:hogwash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More partisan gibberish. What else? Let me guess, the jews run the media and the economy, too?

  22. Darn! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Now the Brazilian police are going to see all the correspondence between me and that Brazilian swimsuit model that's been emailing me!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  23. Corruption is everywhere in Latin America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And make no mistake, ex president Lula is a crook.

  24. Re: Who cares about Brazil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you're nationalists

  25. Corrupt government freaking out ALERT by rod · · Score: 1

    Most of what is in the article has been invented without factual basis.
    There is a huge politic crisis in this (irrelevant) and weird country sitting in one of the most corrupt regions in this world, South America.
    Government is going down. Former corrupt president "Lula" and his congregates are going down. They are going to jail.
    Brazil suffered an incommensurable heist supported by local ignorant people. Now the country is moving toward a violent crash
    http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21684779-disaster-looms-latin-americas-biggest-economy-brazils-fall

    So the source is nothing more than a corrupt gang going down screaming... At least this damned country is doing something.

    1. Re:Corrupt government freaking out ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed a very important detail. There is not a "gang" that is falling screaming, is a another gang that is screaming to enter by force because they are not competent enough to win elections. Do not be a fool to believe in their media.

    2. Re:Corrupt government freaking out ALERT by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Not competent, or insufficiently corrupt? Brazil has a massive problem with official corruption, largely related to the state-owned oil industry.

  26. what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seu esquerdista de merda!!!

    1. Re:what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seu esquerdista de merda!!!

      Mandou bem! :)

  27. Brazil is in its "End Game" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are in what is called the "end game." This show has been put on for us that government is corrupt, so we cheer our police to go in and punish government and take over. We end up with the police state (which we have had for a many years).

    In the name of "corruption" the police will take everything over and rule by decree.

  28. Fact or Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no evidence that this really occurred. It's an accusation until it is proved. The cited article is from the Instituto Lula, which may be posing as victim for its own convenience.

  29. Re: "Seize" by gfxguy · · Score: 0

    +1, but no mod points.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  30. Re: Who cares about Brazil? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Kind of like the National Socialists.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  31. This post is biased by CarlosQuintella · · Score: 1

    This post is clearly biased. Brazil has no effective privacy laws. The law "Marco Civil da Internet" allows the police to request the access but doesn't impose the form. The police process is legit according to brazilian laws. The former President is being accused of several crimes, as well the current President is the process of, that means she may be involved in bribery, money laundry, etc. Impeachment is legit in Brazil, and it will appreciated in the lower chamber very soon.

  32. Re: "Seize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dammit, another troll. Go Back to facebook

  33. biased article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lula and the PT created a chaos in Brazilian politics for the purpose of obstructing the investigation of the Federal Police, federal prosecutors and federal courts in corruption cases in which Lula and the government are involved!
    Even the federal government is considering naming Lula as Minister of the Federal Government in order to ensure you privileged forum and remove investigations of ordinary authorities! A real mobsters scheme and bandits!
    Lula Institute and Lula are not innocent, but perpetrators! And one of the country's biggest corruption scandals!

  34. I wonder if it's necessary by sabbede · · Score: 1

    They're going after the most powerful people in the country. People who have corrupted and subverted all the systems of governance, including justice. Prosecutorial excess may be the only way to overcome the power and influence of the targets. And they have managed to take down people previously thought untouchable, like the international construction mogul that just got a lengthy prison sentence.

  35. That's nothing! by JazzLad · · Score: 1
    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    1. Re:That's nothing! by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      because of The Simpsons, may be a Springfield even here :-)

  36. Let men (cops) work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MAVs finally have reached slashdot. Mortadelas know no limits.

    Instituto Lula is also accused of destroying evidence, having its director and Lula itself under federal investigation for corruption crimes.

    With a bit of luck they will rot in jail!